{mosimage}A row has broken out between Brazil's most senior law official and its health minister about the legality of using human embryos for stem cell research.
My Premium Content
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Leave the unborn alone! Is there not anything that these madd scientists wont disect and defile!
Scientists want fame and fortune now at the expense of innocent lives! Shameful!
Why dont you scientists experiment on yourselves so that we can all be rid of you!
+0
... written by Guest,
June 16, 2005
f**k you, Christian nut! What's shameful is your goddamn ignorance, you cunt.
+0
Stem cells written by Guest,
June 16, 2005
Not all theologies and ethics agree on the beginning of life. Some ancient Jewish sages, for example, say that a fetus does not become a human being until after it is born. There is no reason why, according to this belief, that stem cells should not be used for research. It is possible to be fervently religious and still advocate stem cell research. No one religion has a monopoly on truth. Those who want stem cell research have a righ to their own beliefs. Let the Christian extremists reject cures based on stem cell research and die happy.
+0
Definition written by Guest,
June 16, 2005
Christian: One who believes life begins at conception and ends at birth.
+0
... written by Guest,
June 17, 2005
Moron: One who turns 21 and acts like he's still 12.
+0
... written by Guest,
June 17, 2005
Simpleton: One who hates Christians.
+0
Re: F-You written by Guest,
June 17, 2005
I know about the advantages of stem cell research, and its potential for curing deseases.
However, not at the expense of a potential human being that if allowed to live, COULD BE THE ONE WHO DEVELOPS THE CURE THAT YOU ARE KILLING HIM TO FIND!
+0
f**k YOU ALL OVER AGAIN written by Guest,
June 18, 2005
I don't hate Christians, I just have no respect for anyone who believes in such fairy tales. Talk about a simpleton who acts like he's 12. You people are completely depraved and you're trying to f**k up the rest of the world with your goddamn supersitions. And then you give us this holier than thou, pious bulls**t act. Again, f**k YOU! That's spelled F-U-C-K! A perfectly good word that expressed my sentiments perfectly about a perferctly ignorant, deluded, demented Christian dim wit.
+0
... written by Guest,
June 18, 2005
If you Christians just would practice you ignorant superstitions quietly and leave the rest of us alone to make progress in the world we'd all appreciate it. But, no. We've got you and guys like Bush, DeLay, Santorum, Frist, etc. pushing their f**ked up beliefs on the world and starting a new crusade against Islam (another bunch of deluded f**k-ups). You religious fanatics are going to be the death of us all. Why can't you just f**k-off?
Of snowflakes and flakes written by Guest,
June 18, 2005
The new word in the US that we're hearing is "snowflake." Although that word is used by Christians who find all potential life sacred and all actual life sinful and dirty (especially if you're a follower of Islam or other non-Christian religion or, gasp, and atheist) in order to give personality to a bunch of cells, it's an apt term in that it describes just how insubstantial the "life" of the "snowflake" acutally is.
+0
... written by Guest,
June 19, 2005
Kinda funny that these same Christians, those that cherish life so much, are the first to cheer, raw and praise the death penalty. Actually, don't they shoot doctors who perform abortions for a hobby?
+0
... written by Guest,
June 20, 2005
These Christian nuts are "adopting" embryos! They've gone completely bonkers. Next thing you know they'll be adopting tampons, panty liners, and discarded sperm.
+0
Help written by Guest,
July 20, 2005
I rather think you gentlemen need immediate help. Expletives and rants are both futile and pointless. Denigrating Christians (many of whom have conflicting views about life) simply because they are Christians shows a lack of understanding of society or any sort of integration with same.
+0
Surplus eggs written by Guest,
July 23, 2005
Human eggs preserved for possible artificial insemination but later slated for discard as surplus are not potential human beings. They are not to be used in any attempt to create human beings; they will be washed down the drain. Why is it not possible to make these surplus eggs serve the health of existing humans? Stem cell research does not destroy potential human beings. There are three billion living humans who can benefit from stem cell research. A microscopic egg is not possessed of a soul. Billions of such eggs are produced each month in human females and most are "discarded," if y ou will, by failing to receive sperm. Should be try to capture each woman's eggs each month and fertilize them so we won't lose the potential human beings? This line of thought is crazy. The issue here is not Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or any religion. This is a matter for science, not for prists, mullashs, and rabbis to decide. Theologians are not competent to guide science. They tried it wilth Galileo and made utter fools of themselves. The infallible popes have had to admit they were wrong; the earth orbits the sun. They are wrong again about stem cell research and equally foolish.
Subscribe to this comment's feed
wont disect and defile!
Scientists want fame and fortune now at the expense of innocent lives! Shameful!
Why dont you scientists experiment on yourselves so that we can all be rid of you!