The good news for Brazil is that it appears as if the PT or Workers Party of Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva has failed in its attempt to establish a totalitarian government through democratic means.
My Premium Content
Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Tried to get an idea of what was going on, but since I live only in Brazil since 5 months, I had difficulties with reading the newspapers. This article has brought me up to speed. Thanks.
+0
Corruption is treason! written by Guest,
July 15, 2005
I just want to add, Mr. Richard Hayes, that this sea of corruption is much older than any political party existent today. It is not like that suddenly Brazil has far more corruption today than in the past. The fact is that the media today is working harder to expose those criminals.
Again, the difference now for what seems to be a greater wave of corruption in the political arean is the greater exposure from the press.
I am not a "petista" although I did vote for Lula because he really appeared to be a honest man. However, still, I am not sure if he is part of the corruption or just a fool. He is most probably an incompetent leader, politically however. The actions of the Brazilian Federal Policy is really a good point of his government. I just think that somehow we should be able to quickly punish all the political criminals involved in the scandals. No parlamentar imunity of any kind for those who become real suspects. Their judgment in a federal court should be implacable. That would scare future candidates to a criminal life of that kind. That is something I am really dreaming of.
Sergio
+0
skewed facts, tilted analysis written by Guest,
July 15, 2005
Dear Sir,
For someone who actually lives in Brazil, and hence should be closer to the source of events, your analysis demonstrates a more tilted analysis than the one a certain sector of the political elite is trying to force down the throats of the population.
For instance, you make no mention of the fact that Roberto Jefferson, prior to donning the garbs of a prime accuser, is in the box, accused of organizing an embezzlement scheme from the positions his PTB colleagues held at major state-owned enterprises.
When members of the PT cried out treachery and foul play, accusing a certain sector of the political elite of fomenting a coup, they were not referring to a military take-over of the country. Fortunately, the PT has deprived the military of the means to reassert itself.
As an American, it is astonishing to read your contempt of due process. You make no mention of the fact that the accusations you cite have come from the media – and have yet to make their way through the judiciary. As an American, you should also demonstrate how complicated, time consuming and expensive it is to decode white collar crime and money laundering.
As for the ill-fated press “censorship” policy the government tried to implement, it was swiftly abandoned upon realizing what it actually was amounting to. On the other hand, you make no mention of the fact that all of Brazil’s media are in the hands of very few private conglomerates, and that when Brazilians are actually able to get quality news, which is rare, it merely serves the interest of this very powerful sector.
Finally, you cite economic indicators as the positive note to Lula’s actions, whereas all criticism of the Executive ought to begin with how delicately they have catered to the financial elite.
Your facts are too selective to be of use in drawing a full-scale picture of the layers of corruption affecting the political process in Brazil. In turn, your analysis tilts to support the interest of those who, indeed, have contributed to the pauperization of the population.
There’s a lot money to be made in politics in Brazil. And those you have been making it have become fed up with the PT’s control of the state bureaucracy, which has sometimes, though hardly always, wound up with individuals becoming affluent.
This is where the moral issue ought to begin. There are questions of power at stake here, as well as corruption. Each have to be minutely seperated to even begin to understand what is morally reprehensible here, prior to determining who is criminally involved, that is, who is "innocent until proven guilty."
Yours, A critical reader.
For instance, you make no mention of the fact that Roberto Jefferson, prior to donning the garbs of the prime accuser, is in the box, accused of organizing an embezzlement scheme whose sole
+0
... written by Guest,
July 15, 2005
If you don't think there is a lot of political corruption in Brasil, just go to Miami and check the ownership deeds of those million+ dollar condos in Coconut Grove and Miami. See how many belong to brasilian political families. you'd be amazed
+0
... written by Guest,
July 15, 2005
See how the liberals in Canada were buying politicians from Quebec. Quebec was making a lot money only for fun.
+0
Happens Everywhere...He Does Get POSITIV written by Guest,
July 15, 2005
What's new? Politics & corruption? No way, it can't be. Being from the US I can see this happening all the time...just take farm subsidies. Farm subsidies go to "poor" farmers who can't compete on the global market, but alas, it those same "poor" farmers who contribute to the various farm lobbyists who have become some of the largest campaign contributors - to both parties!!
Lula is a simple person, who sets out to please everyone, in any way that he can. In this case, I doubt he knew directly about what was occuring, he only trusted his counterparts to get results. This happens in business all the time, you trust those that bring results, and Dirceu brought results - with it trust from Lula.
Instead of looking at what this President has not been proven of doing or not doing, look instead at his list of accomplishments that even his predecessor could not achieve:
- Passage of a much needed, and much delayed, bill on social security...decreasing the liability of hiring workers, thereby increasing job possibilities - Passage of a bankruptcy bill that will allow expansion of business and create more jobs - Increase in minimum wage by 33% to $121 / month...still low, but 33% is better than 0% - Exempting 7 million poor Brazilians from paying taxes - Decrease the legal system's inefficiencies and increasing processing times by decreasing the # of cases judges work (rule of prior presedence) - Increased a trade deficit into the largest trade surplus ever (same for the current account), which supplies much needed jobs and $$$ to Brazil - Creation of more than 2.5 million jobs...more than anyone else in a decade - Loans have increased 35%...making items much easier to purchase - Pushing the currency 48% higher...making imports cheaper and travel to other countries less expensive - Calmed inflation to a modest 7%...ensuring the lower and middle-class, not just the upper-class, maintains their buying-power (a $ today is not $0.70 tomorrow) - Guided steady growth even with interest rates near the highest in the modern world - Average monthly payments to poor families has tripled to $25 / month - Plans to provide 11 million families with 3 meals per day by 2006 - Attempts to change the IMF's debt repayment to not include infrastructure...which would have made it easier to hire millions of workers to improve the roads, ports, railroads, buildings, etc
Sure, there's always room for improvement. I too wish there were greater strides in education (need to start charging modest amounts to the people who can afford to pay, and in making it easier to open businesses (time to open a business, reduction in hiring / firing costs of employees, etc). However, who do you want to help make those improvements down the road...someone who has proven himself to accomplish much of what he sets out to do, or a rich, aristocrat, who has come up through the ranks thinking not what they believe, but what someone will pay them to believe (think Cardoso, even though he made good strides himself, but didn't accomplish 1/2 the things of Lula in 4x as much time). Maybe Lula's team succumbed to this pressure because they knew the only way to get the critical things they got done was to ensure a coalition. However, it all goes back to accomplishments and goals...both of which are firmly alligned with the majority of Brazil focused on progress. Brazil is lucky to have a person who can empathise with so many - both rich and poor - and this should go further than anything else. Instead of lynching a person who is actually try to make things better for so many in Brazil, try instead to remove those who stand in his way - like Severino Cavalcanti, who pushed to double his own pay even though he already makes 200 times more than the average Brazilian! It is time for Brazilians to decide...either lead, follow, or get out of the way! Which one are you?
+0
Pure essence of Bulls**t! written by Guest,
July 15, 2005
Lula is the best President Brasil ever had!
+0
... written by Guest,
July 16, 2005
I also agree Lula is one of Brazil's best presidents but I dont think he is the best ever......Whoever is politically capable of reforming the political system, by adopting a parliamentary model and a true tax reform in my opinion will be rewarded with the title as the best president ever!!!
+0
... written by Guest,
July 16, 2005
This guy is a crank and a crackpot. I agree. The article is pure bulls**t. Congratulations on being able to get someone to publish your yellow "journalism" (i.e., propaganda of Chase Manhattan Bank, et al.). Lula has done and is doing very well in light of the difficult political system that exists in Brazil.
+0
Critical Reader written by Guest,
July 16, 2005
Congratulations to YOU! An excellent job filleting Mr. Hayes. His "analysis" is as phony and biased as it comes.
+0
... written by Guest,
July 17, 2005
This refrain of "he either knew or he's incompetent" is total nonsense. Where do you people get this stupid damned if you do damned if you don't thinking? We're talking about Brazil here, with decades of corruption in politics, from the local dog catcher up to the office of the president. Do you really think that an honest president like Lula could possibly know everything about what people in his party are doing? If you do, you are certifiably insane.
And again, remember that for the most part we're dealing with allegations made by a known criminal at this point. How can you make out an indictment against Lula before you even know what the facts are? You can't. So stop it.
I agree with what has been said above. The author of this story is clearly a hack with an axe to grind. He's a lickspittle of corporate power and greed. He has a cause to make him look as though he cares about justice in Brazil, but in reality, he hasn't a scintilla of compassion for the plight of the common person in Brazil. He's yet another elitist, Lula hater who will say anything as long as it's anti-Lula and he has no ethics other than self-aggrandizement. He is probably the kind of person who would gladly be the bag man for a corporation seeking to buy a corrupt politician and thus probably a hypocrite. He'll do whatever it takes to put money into his own pocket at the expense of ethics or justice. He is a fraud with no soul, no conscience, no honesty, no integrity.
+0
AND written by Guest,
July 18, 2005
Let's not forget that till now no one has formally accused Lula of any dishonest action …
+0
... written by Guest,
July 18, 2005
From Reuters today: "Lula's public approval rating, however, has been largely unaffected by the crisis and even edged up slightly, according to last week's poll by the Sensus Institute."
+0
Sorry written by Guest,
July 19, 2005
Lula is an Union man. He was not educated to be head of a Country. The PT is responsible to give all suport that he needs. Unfortunately, in all parties have good and bad people.
+0
... written by Guest,
July 19, 2005
This guy Hayes is Christaldo lite. An even bigger waste of time than the real thing.
+0
HAYES written by Guest,
July 19, 2005
I do not know him. Do you know him? I was never been introduced to him. Then the guys are folks. Interesting!
+0
... written by Guest,
July 21, 2005
nor do I want to know him.
+0
Sea of mud written by Guest,
July 21, 2005
Thanks for a truly informative article. These latest events in Brazil come to me as no surprise however. Based on my own experience with these lazy, incompetent and corrupt petistas, I knew that it would be only a question of time until the country would find itself immersed in a sea of mud.
+0
... written by Guest,
July 21, 2005
Sear of mud. I did not expect so much from a politic organization where in general all unversity professores were members. Look how desorganize are all the programs.
+0
Re: Sea of mud written by Guest,
July 22, 2005
I'm sure your "experience" is vast and qualifies you as an expert on Brazil and Brazilian politics. Another expert here giving out his "grand" opinions for free. Listen up everyone. Your brain is a sea of mud.
+0
Corruption Scandals are positives written by Guest,
July 23, 2005
I used to receive a box sent from my family to Toronto in 20 days. In general, when I sent something to my folks never arrived. Now, the same box arrived in one week and they deliver in my door, before I need to have a long walk to Post Office. In the Brazilian post office corruption scandal there were a lot things going on.
+0
Army in the Government written by Guest,
July 28, 2005
Sometimes, I miss the army in the government. There was corruption but there was more safety and the post office was more reliable. If you complain, somebody will loss the job by the way. Today so much freedom and so much rights.
Nesta polÃtica do Governo do PT, não temos órgãos governamental defensor dos Direitos Humanos enquanto tiver neste partido, uma soma elevada de parlamentares corruptos, que só se preocupam com seus interesses particulares e super salários, ou seja, salários de marajás. TerÃamos que pedir uma intervenção da Anistia Internacional para rever a situação dos brasileiros, que foram barbaramente prejudicados pela Ditadura Militar. Este Governo que se proclamou democrático, estar dando continuidade os mesmos castigos que parte da população brasileira sofreu no perÃodo da Ditadura Militar, repassando os direitos de anistiados polÃticos para parentes, amigos filiados a seu Partido, e com esta medida, tira os direitos das verdadeiras vÃtimas da Ditadura Militar, e presenteia para aqueles que muitas das vezes naquele perÃodo ainda não eram nascidos.