Brazzil

Since 1989 trying to understand Brazil

Home 2005 January 2006 Desperately in Need of Friends, Bush Warms Up to Brazil

Search

Custom Search
Members : 6884
Content : 3577
Content View Hits : 24923711

Who's Online

We have 381 guests and 1 member online

Login Form






Desperately in Need of Friends, Bush Warms Up to Brazil PDF Print E-mail
2006 - January 2006
Written by Clara Angelica Porto   
Tuesday, 31 January 2006 07:39

US President George W. BushIn 2002 the Bush administration made public that it would not get into regional specific politics nor it would relate to other countries through mediation of regional leaders. When Condoleezza Rice visited Brazil last year, it was clear there were changes about to happen. From not paying much attention to Latin American countries, too busy with the war, to sending Rice to Brazil, President Bush most certainly had ideas in his mind.

His image suffered a lot because of the war in Iraq and even the leaders he had hopes for in Latin America, did not catch.

How so? Bush liked Menem in Argentina and Nestor Kirchner was the winner. Bush thought Vicente Fox from Mexico meant success and look at what happened. Álvaro Uribe, from Colombia, was another of Bush's certainties of success, but the Colombia plan went down the drain.

Venezuelan Hugo Chavez does not like Bush, does not hide it from anyone, and gets more powerful every day. As much as he is criticized for his tyrannic ways, he practically vanished illiteracy from the map since he took office and, in Venezuela, his numbers are very high.

Who to speak with? Bush administration does not particularly like Brazil's present politics, i.e., favoring a closer relation with the Middle East, recognition of the Palestine state, being against unilateral politics, pro-UN and fighting for a place with UN's Security Council, not to mention that Brazil seemed to be getting along better than ever with the Pentagon's x-rated countries, Cuba and Venezuela.

But Brazil is South America's giant and despite all the political scandals involving President Lula's party and some of his key staff people, his leadership has spread abroad.

But the Brazilian President, once a radical left-wing has shown to be more pragmatic than anything and Washington liked that very much. The fear that a leftist former union worker president could form a Brasília/Caracas/Havana trio is long gone.

As a matter of fact, Lula became a kind of Wall Street sweetheart, and his finance man, Antônio Palocci, gained respect from all first world countries. On top of this, the uneasiness of dealing with José Dirceu, who once was persona non grata in the US, and who had to be digested as a spokesperson for Brazil, is over. Dirceu is simply out of the picture at this point. At least officially.

However, other fears have taken place. Bush has not been successful with ALCA, for lack of an area of cooperation, and China does great business with countries in Latin America, including growing partnerships with Mexico, Brazil and Venezuela.


China has recently signed a military agreement with Cuba, has sold arms to Venezuela and is discussing direct investment in the off-shore oil industry of that country. A mission from Bolivia is undergoing gas negotiations with China.

These are all signs that Latin America is walking on its own feet, at least as far as business is concerned and geopolitics is something left far behind. Brazil and Russia, Brazil and China, Brazil and Venezuela, China and Venezuela, and Mexico and endless combinations.

Think fast, act faster. Who is the best partner now? Who is more like everybody's friend and business partner? Eureka! And here comes Brazil and its not sophisticated but very smart and pragmatic president. And so it went. The not so smart but very hard headed US President found his Latin American mate.

President Lula hosted President Bush in Brasília, the two seemed very much at ease with each other and even had things in common. Some even say that the two seemed to think as one. Not too long ago who would think such a thing would happen? The right wing ultra-conservative fundamentalist Bush and the former radical metal union leader, left wing Luis Inácio Lula da Silva. Never say never.

One of the things that Bush proposed was partnership to counteract the growth of China and India. Energy is also another issue because the US buys 15% of its oil from Venezuela. Some radical views even relate the invasion of Iraq to the security of oil supply to the US from Venezuela.

So developing a closer relationship to the Brazilian President who seems to have close ties with Venezuela's Chavez is a very pragmatic idea after all. Not too long ago, the US became very close with Japan and the EU against developing countries, which called for the creation of the G-20, as a response against the arrogance of the richer nations. But circumstances change things.

In a global world, with growing countries, Latin American countries are diversifying and spreading their reach, buying different things from different countries, including China, India and Russia.

Now a 'cocalero' wins the elections in Bolivia. Evo Morales won with 51% of the votes, and is the first president of indigenous origin in the country. Morales is also the leader of the coca plantations and a candidate of the MAS, Movement to Socialism.

Ecuador is going in the same direction, towards left. China is running towards the pod to win as a global potency. And it is running fast. All of this with a somewhat, to say the least, anti-American after taste.

So we can conclude that in the world of international politics relationships are not too different from other kinds of relationships. People get closer for different reasons and interests. But there always must be a reason, a target, a goal.

The United States has understood that it no longer can manipulate world politics alone. It will need regional leaders as partners, or at least as good friends, to start with. In Latin America, President Bush chose President Lula, of Brazil.

Clara Angelica Porto is a Brazilian bilingual journalist living in New York. She went to school in Brazil and at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Clara is presently working as the English writer for The Brasilians, a monthly newspaper in Manhattan. Comments welcome at clara.angelica@gmail.com.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (24)Add Comment
6 and half a dozen...
written by Guest, January 31, 2006
Bush, the tyranic fundamentalist or Lula, the corrupt worker (has he really ever worked, or maybe he just did union politics? Ha!) Get it? I did. Hello Clara, all you're saying is correct, but aren't you being too nice? Why didn't you just say what you really had in mind? Or so I think... Anyway, a good article that put people to think. And you know what? Politicians, they all stink!
Yeah, don\'t they? Like s**t, man
written by Guest, January 31, 2006

Pragmatic and millions enriched Lula. Fundamentalist and millions enriched Bush. How convenient... of course they can be partners, they are so much alike. Poor US... Poor Brazil... Poor us, little people...
Dead wrong !
written by Guest, January 31, 2006


There is nothing wrong between the USA and Mexico. the USA are buying 80 % of ALL
Mexican exports.
Mexico is pro FTAA like the vast majority of Latin and South American countries. Just read again Fox comments when Bush was in Argentina not so long ago.
Even Uruguay and Paraguay, Mercosur members, are dreaming of becoming FTAA members.
Even Morales after having said that if elected he will be the "nightmare" of the USA is now asking discussions...with the FTAA because he has goods to sell !.

The truth is that there remain only 3 Presidents against the FTAA :
Lula, Kirchner and Chavez ! That's all !

There is nothing that wrong either with China. the USA have a trade deficit with China of US$ 200 billions...and not in oil,
not in agricultural or services sectors.
JUST in industrial goods produced in China.
The U.S. trade deficit with China alone is in fact far greater than the total of ALL Brazilian exports combined.

To the fisrt poster
written by Guest, January 31, 2006
Prove that Lula is corrupt, please. Otherwise, STFU.
To the last poster
written by Guest, February 01, 2006

But corruption in Brazil has now reached unprecedented levels. The Lula administration is currently responsible for the biggest series of corruption scandals in the country’s history. No other government has ever had more top-party leaders, congressmen, ministers, and functionaries under investigation for fraud in such a brief period of time. According to James Petras, a sociology professor and expert on Brazilian politics:
Corruption has devastated the Lula regime in Brazil. Every sector of Lula’s Workers’ Party (PT) has been implicated in bribery, fraud, vote buying, theft of public funds, failure to report illicit campaign financing, and a host of other felonious behavior, revealed almost daily between May-July 2005.

All of Lula’s closest and most important advisers, congressional leaders and party bosses have been forced to resign and are under congressional investigation for illegal large-scale transfers of funds into electoral campaigns, private enrichment, and financing full time functionaries.


to :Prove that Lula is corrupt !
written by Guest, February 01, 2006

Before his election he was a leader of the PT. Even a more important than those who were his lieutenants...such as Dirceu and others. They were also close personal friends.

So just think twice : how could he have not neither known, nor agreed, nor even not participated on the vote buying scandal ?

Why members from other political parties received money from the PT ? Hidden money, originally denied having been received, until evidences were given ?????

Come on.

As one Brazilian poltician said : if he did not klnow.....how did Lula became President !

And finally, has Lula not said at least twice, that afterall this is a common practice and it is known that political corruption exists in Brazil since a long time ?

But obviously, if you are blind, earless and with a small brain, you will continue to trust that there was no vote buying and that Lula is innocent.

In fact this is exactly what Lula and his gang expect from you !
...
written by Guest, February 01, 2006
"But corruption in Brazil has now reached unprecedented levels. The Lula administration is currently responsible for the biggest series of corruption scandals in the country’s history."

Wrong and wrong. Twas ever thus, and no Lula isn't.
No proof, you lose
written by Guest, February 01, 2006
I knew you couldn't prove it. The press and the opposition has tried to prove that Lula is corrupt and with all their resources, with all the others of all the parties, Lula was not implicated in corruption.

Thanks for playing, but you lose.

So please, STFU.
Another view
written by Guest, February 02, 2006
To "No proof, you lose":

You have just proved the old adage "There are none so blind as those who will not see". Have you ever actually experienced Brazil?
...
written by Guest, February 02, 2006
I tend to agree with the writer. Lula deceived his people, there was never so much hope as when he was elected. And everybodys knows Ze Dirceu has been the brain of the Worker's Part project. And the plan was to reelect Lula, then make Dirceu, the brain, president. But there was a hole... an the ones who exposed the hole have a hole too. But they deceived all those who believed they had a dream, the people's dream and would work to make it come through. Myself included.
Political Promises
written by Guest, February 04, 2006
I was in Maceió to witness the rejoicing at Lula´s win and tried to warn the elated locals that nothing much was ever going to change in Brasil after Lula took office. They said I was cynical and that Lula had to be given a chance. But 500 years of corruption in Brasil is not a good omen for radical change for the better. Sure, he had great ideas and lots of promises. But he soon discovered what the word ´compromise´ meant. His great plans to bring equality and opportunity to the teaming millions of poor, landless, starving and unemployed blacks in Brasil met with strong opposition - simply because they did not benefit the rich and powerful who like their interests protected and who see no value in these ideals, and who certainly have no compassion for these unfortunates.

When travelling in Brasil on a bus with well-off local Brasilians, I often ask a well-heeled fellow-passenger, as we pass a favela..."Have you no shame with this image of your country?" They usually reply with a shrug of the shoulders, (indicating helplessness), give me a look of distain, then carry-on reading their Fola de São Paulo.
Beware, Brasil!
written by Guest, February 05, 2006
Politicians always play nice face-to face, but they are at heart, a backstabbing, deceitful bunch. To trust Bush or the USA is putting too many of our economic eggs in a frail basket.

To me, Lula's biggest recommendation is that he hasn't really done anything. Forma politician that's about as much as you can hope for. When you elect someone that actually wants to DO something, that's when you have real problems, Look at what's happened in the USA. Bush has destroyed three countries and he's just getting warmed up.

Tio Lula, please smile, make nice, and ignore the SOB.
What a joke!!!
written by Guest, February 06, 2006
Bush doesn't need friends or Brazil or anyone else. Where do you guys get this kind of Crap? Sounds like S. America is trying to tell people that Bush is this lonely guy needing support. Hog wash! Wake up to Reality! The U.S. needs NO ONE.Dream on if you think Bush need anyone. He's just trying to be diplomatic and nice.
Lula And Brains?
written by Guest, February 06, 2006
These two words don't go together.
...
written by Guest, February 06, 2006
Yes the US needs allies, don't be naive about that. Does he really need Brazil as an ally is another question. It certainly doesn't hurt what you are trying to pass the Free Trade of the Americas. Or you are trying to tempure the influence of Chavez on others in the region. He certainly doesn't need brazil to be an ally like he needs england, but no country can go it alone. Any political pundit no matter how right wing or isolationist will tell you that except maybe patrick buchanan.
...
written by Guest, February 08, 2006
The article talks about pragmatic international politics. Except for the desperation in the title, which should be different, it just analyzes what is really going on. Yes, Bush does need Brazil as an ally, not for the same reasons he needs England or other first world countries, but let's not underestimate the strength of Latin America and the need for the US to keep in good terms with the region. I agree with the author.
...
written by Guest, February 08, 2006
some one wrote

"The truth is that there remain only 3 Presidents against the FTAA :
Lula, Kirchner and Chavez ! That's all !"

Lula, Kirchner and Chavez are nothing more nothing less than the presidents of the three major economies in South America.
The other countries are way too weak to resist any kind of political pressure.
Dah!
written by Guest, February 09, 2006
Some people are so naive it's almost hysterical. They just don't see what's happening in the world and how the US international politics will have to go through pretty major changes. Or else...
K.K.
written by Guest, February 13, 2006
i hate it when people r such a warm up like Bush is.
Dah!
written by Guest, February 13, 2006
:zzz
tanna
written by Guest, February 13, 2006
:cry
Tay-Tay (aka:Taylor Tompson in the 6th g
written by Guest, February 13, 2006
im so so so borded tos death
:zzz
...
written by Guest, February 16, 2006

Bush needs South America, of course he does. Not in the same proportion he needs England, but right now, the US needs a lot more than what it is getting. There is economic disaster around the corner, fund cuts in many needed areas and there is more than the country can afford going to a war with no victory. Meaning... this man needs friends, yes. Even if the likes of Lula, who has been a disappointment. They are all dirty. But they need each other.
...
written by Guest, February 21, 2006
It's refreshing to read an article that it isn't biased, that looks at things objectively.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack