Brazzil

Since 1989 trying to understand Brazil

Search

Custom Search

Cheap Mobile Phones
---------------
Members : 2565
Content : 3357
Content View Hits : 20840935

Who's Online

We have 169 guests online

Login Form




Pingo
Breaking News from Brazil
From Brazzil Mag news team
Brazzil Magazine


Brazil Is Back on Track PDF Print E-mail
Written by Alexandre Rocha   
Thursday, 13 April 2006 13:14

Cargo train in Itu, interior of São Paulo, BrazilRailway transport is considered the ideal means for great distances and for cargo in bulk, like grain and ore. Brazil, a country of continental dimensions, a great agricultural producer, and a country of great mineral riches, however, seems to have ignored this fact for decades, having let its railway lines, which once totaled 38,000 kilometers in length, to fall to decadence.

In the second half of last century, the country made a clear option for the transport of most cargo on trucks.

The importance of railways in the Brazilian transport matrix fell and reached 19% in the 1990's. In turn, other nations with large territories, like the United States, Canada and Australia, transport over 40% of their cargo on trains. In India, the percentage rises as high as 50% and in Russia it is over 80%.

Apart from that, for great distances, according to specialists, the cost of highway freight is three times as much as railway freight.

"As logistics costs with railways and waterways are lower, a study by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) shows that Brazil would economize over US$ 2 billion if it opted for these models," stated the director of the Transport Planning and Policy Evaluation Department at the Ministry of Transportation, Francisco Luiz Baptista Costa.

More than seeing assets built over decades falling to bits, Brazil also lost a great part of its railway industry, a sector that in the 1970's produced on average 3,000 wagons a year and that in the 1990's produced less than 200.

This panorama started changing in 1996, when railways, which had been taken over by the government in the 1950's, were privatized. Of the original 38,000 original kilometers, 28,500 remained.

"What happened in the mean time I do not know," stated the executive director of the National Association of Railway Transport (ANTF), Rodrigo Vilaça.

Leap in 10 Years

From then on Brazil started getting onto the right track again. According to the ANTF, in the last 10 years the privatized companies have invested 11 billion reais (US$ 5.1 billion) in the purchase of wagons and locomotives and in technology.

This caused the total volume of cargo transported on railways to rise from 256 million tons in 1997 to 392 million last year. The participation of the sector in the national transport grid rose to 26% in 2005.

The revitalization of railways also rekindled the industry. Ancient companies gained new blood, even foreign, as is the case with the National Wagon Factory (FNV) and Cobrasma, which currently belong to a joint venture between North American Amstead Industries and the Brazilian Iochpe Maxion.

New companies also started operating in the field, like Randon, a traditional maker of highway trailers, and Santa Fé, a partnership between América Latina Logística (ALL) and Indian group Besco.

With this, the Brazilian industry reached in 2005 a record figure of 7,500 wagons produced, and currently generates around 30,000 direct and indirect jobs. The industry has even consolidated itself as an export platform for multinational companies.

Behind the rebirth of railways is an enormous demand for logistics services that highways could no longer supply, caused by an increase in production of grain and of more and more dynamic foreign trade.

"Two factors were very important for this revitalization: the need for transport of material in bulk, especially soy, and the increase of ironworks production in the country, with the need for transport of calcite, coal and ores," stated the president of the Brazilian Association of Railway Industries (Abifer), Luís Cesário Amaro da Silveira.

Towards the Future

All of this was done without significantly increasing the railway grid, but just operating the system better. And operators intend to continue investing in modernization, in the material in operation and in technology.

MRS Logística alone, which operates the grid in the southeast of the country, formerly operated by the Federal Railway Network (RFFSA), intends to invest 2.9 billion reais (US$ 1.4 billion) up to 2009.

The target of the operators is to reach 2008 moving 28% of Brazilian cargo.  "We may reach 30% if the government helps," stated Rodrigo Vilaça. The bet on the continuation of growth is greatly due to the fact that users have returned to trusting in the system and the demand only tends to grow.

A proof of this is the 23 year contract that ALL, which operates the railway grid in the south of the country, closed with Bunge Alimentos to transport their agricultural produce.

Opinions vary regarding the ideal participation of railways in the transport system in the country. To the ANTF it should be around 40%, but it must not be forgotten that the country also has a very great potential for the use of waterways and of coastwise navigation that is still very little exploited.

After recuperation, the second phase of the revitalization process, which is the responsibility of the government, is the removal of bottlenecks, like railway crossings and invasion of railway areas by families, obliging trains to travel slowly over various stretches, increasing the possibility of accidents.

The third phase, also supposedly in the hands of the government, is expansion of the railway grid. This includes projects like the expansion of the North-South Railway; the South Coastal, a 165 kilometer stretch in the southeastern Brazilian state of Espírito Santo, to cost 700 million reais (US$ 327 million); and the largest of all, the Transnordestina, a railway to cover a distance of almost 2,000 kilometers in northeastern Brazil (955 already existing and 905 to be built), estimated at 4.5 billion reais (US$ 2.1 billion).

According to Vilaça, if all takes place without hindrance, the sector imagines that the railway grid may rise to 34,500 kilometers by 2012. For this, however, investment of 9 billion reais (US$ 4.2 billion) will be necessary.

"But ideally, in a country like ours, for growth to be taken to the interior, the railway grid would have to total at least 50,000 kilometers," he said.

Mauá Started It All

The history of railways in Brazil began in the southeastern state of Rio de Janeiro in 1854, with Mauá Railway. The railway, which connected Estrela Port, in Guanabara Bay, to Fragoso, close to the city of Petrópolis, had a length of 14.5 kilometers.

The person responsible for the construction was businessman and banker Irineu Evangelista de Souza, who after the construction of the first railway in the country received the title of Baron of Mauá. Mauá was a later name for the ancient Estrela Port, which was beside the railway terminal.

The Baron's company, Imperial Companhia de Navegação a Vapor e Estrada de Ferro Petrópolis (Imperial Steamboat Navigation and Railway Company of Petrópolis), was responsible for the shipment of products arriving at the port to Raiz da Serra, close to the city of Petrópolis. The locomotive used on the stretch was a steam engine built in Manchester, England, and it operated for 30 years.

After the Mauá Railway, other railways were built, among them one connecting Recife to São Francisco (in northeastern Brazil), in 1858; Dom Pedro II Railway, also in 1858, with an initial stretch of 47.2 kilometers in the state of Rio de Janeiro; and the Bahia-São Francisco railway (also in northeastern Brazil), in 1860. And this way the railway grid started growing.

Among the works that deserve special attention are the Rio-São Paulo Railway, which connected the two most important cities in the country, both in the southeast, in 1877; the Paranaguá-Curitiba, considered a beacon in Brazilian railway engineering, and the Dona Teresa Cristina Railway, which was 112 kilometers long.

In 1884 Brazil already had over 6,000 kilometers of highways and in 1888 there were already 9,200 kilometers in operation and another 9,000 under construction, according to information supplied by the National Department of Transport Infrastructure (DNIT).

An important factor in the history of railways was the construction of the Madeira-Mamoré Railway, between 1907 and 1912, in the middle of the Amazon. Brazil was obliged to build the railway as payment for the incorporation of the state of Acre, which then belonged to Bolivia.

The railway was built to transport latex produced in the northern region of Bolivia. Over 20,000 employees worked on the construction of the railway, which became known as Mad Maria, due to the number of people who died from contagious diseases in the middle of the forest.

The importance of railways was so great that in 1922, 100 years after the country's independence, Brazil already had 29,000 kilometers of railway lines, about the same as the country has today, around 2,000 steam engines and 30,000 wagons.

It was at the end of the 1930's, when Getúlio Vargas was the president of the country, that the state started taking over the railway system.

At the beginning of the 1950's, the Federal Government decided to unite the administration of the 18 railways in the country, which had a total of 37,000 kilometers.

In 1957, company Rede Ferroviária Federal S.A. (RFFSA - Federal Railway Network) was established to administer, exploit and expand the country's railways. However, investment in the sector was drastically reduced, eventually bringing the country to reprivatize the system.

Anba - www.anba.com.br

Comments (5)Add Comment
Standard gauge?
written by Guest, April 14, 2006
What about the different gauges used in Latin America? Throughout North America (US,Canada and Mexico) the standart gauge is used, making economic integration far easier. Will those new lines being built in Brazil use that standard gauge?
Mr. McKnight
written by Guest, April 29, 2006
Having just returned from Espirito Santo last December, I am very happy for Brazil's future in both the oil and train transport sectors and wish Brazil every sucess and congratulations in producing more oil than they use.
Robert McKnight
Ease of movement
written by greywolf, May 20, 2006
When I first arrived in Brazil last year for a project, I was surprised by the lack of railways, after being used to an encompassing railway grid in Europe and in my home country, Israel.
Not only goods, but people can travel by rail more efficiently, cheaper and more safely than by road.
I'm glad to see that the Railways are returning to the picture of Brazilian commerce and travel.
Ease of movement
written by greywolf, May 20, 2006
When I first arrived in Brazil last year for a project, I was surprised by the lack of railways, after being used to an encompassing railway grid in Europe and in my home country, Israel.
Not only goods, but people can travel by rail more efficiently, cheaper and more safely than by road.
I'm glad to see that the Railways are returning to the picture of Brazilian commerce and travel.
Mr. Thomas's Web Pages
written by D.E. Thomas, January 06, 2007
"Not only goods, but people can travel by rail more efficiently, cheaper and more safely than by road."

Not necessarily. Most goods that are transported by rail have to be transshipped to trucks or other means of road transport at some point during transit. The cost of time and money to do this may offset any savings that are alleged to come from rail transport. Similarly, even the fastest rail transport system has difficulty competing with private cars, buses, and planes for door-to-door transit times.

Even in places like Japan and France, high-speed rail survives only because of massive government subsidies. In developing countries like Brazil, the taxes required to develop a suitable infrastructure would most likely destroy the economy and benefit very few. (Most likely, the system would never be satisfactorily developed to be of practical use to many people.)

Brazil would better serve itself investing in better roads which can be used by nearly every major means of transport--truck, bus and car. There may be a useful role for railroads, but there are no large highly developed countries where railroads are the most important means of transport of either passengers or freight.

Write comment
quote
bold
italicize
underline
strike
url
image
quote
quote
smile
wink
laugh
grin
angry
sad
shocked
cool
tongue
kiss
cry
smaller | bigger

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack
Credit Cards UK | Debt Consolidation | Bankruptcy | Cell Phone | Cell Phones