Brazzil

Since 1989 trying to understand Brazil

Search

Custom Search

Cheap Mobile Phones
---------------
Members : 2563
Content : 3357
Content View Hits : 20839288

Who's Online

We have 196 guests online

Login Form




Pingo
Breaking News from Brazil
From Brazzil Mag news team
Brazzil Magazine


Behind Free Koran Distribution in Brazil Is Islam's Push to Win the Infidels PDF Print E-mail
Written by Paolo Bassi   
Thursday, 15 June 2006 20:31

The Koran translated into PortugueseAccording to an article published here in Brazzil, on June 1, 2006, free copies of the Koran were distributed by Muslim academics, to the São Paulo Trade Association, São Paulo State University and the São Paulo City Council. Thousands more copies will be distributed to other Brazilian institutions, courtesy of the Saudi Embassy.

The Koran is the central guiding text of Islam. It is regarded by Muslims as the unalterable word of God (Allah), given piecemeal in Arabic, to Islam's founder, Mohammad, over about a 20 year period in the early 7th Century. The actual text was finalized, and all competing versions banned, by Mohammad's immediate successor.

On its face the Koran donation in Brazil seems to be an ordinary cultural exchange to expand knowledge of Islam. However, pure cultural exchanges are based upon mutual respect and reciprocity. There is no evidence that Brasil, or any other non-Muslim country, is allowed corresponding rights by Muslim governments.

Furthermore, the Koran is being freely donated without any thing or idea actually being exchanged. Gifts, whether religious or from corporations, are intended to promote an idea or sell a product. Furthermore, gifts given by governments usually have a political motive, thus making it necessary to question the donor's motives and beliefs.

Equally disquieting is why a secular Brazilian state university and the São Paulo City Council are receiving copies of the Koran at all. It is difficult to see the connection or relevance between these bodies and Islam, or for that matter any religion.

The Koran distribution in Brasil is in fact not an isolated event but part of an ongoing effort by Muslim activists to spread Islam in non-Muslim countries. Orthodox Islamic teaching divides the world into two mutually exclusive camps; the house of peace or "Dar al-Islam" and the abode of war, "Dar al-Harb", as represented by the "infidels", especially the West.

It is a fundamental tenet of Islam to bring "infidel" nations under its religious and political control. This relentless belief has driven Islamic expansion since Islam began in 7th Century Arabia. In the past Islamic domination was brought about by the sword, however, in the modern era, Islam's "soft power" and demographics are just as effective.

Islam's soft power is largely based on petro-dollars. After the 1973 oil price hike raised Arab, and in particular Saudi, wealth to staggering levels, part of that money was targeted for the expansion of Sunni Islam in the West and Asia.

In the United States, for example, the majority of mosques have been constructed with Saudi money. In fact, many of the preachers or imams at these mosques are also appointed by the Saudi religious establishment.

Mosques aside, Saudi and other Muslim money has also been busy financing Islamic studies Departments at American universities. Georgetown University even has a center for Muslim-Christian Understanding, which was funded by and named after one of the world's wealthiest men, Alwaleed bin Talal - a member of the Saudi ruling elite and also a close friend and business partner of ex-President George H. W. Bush.

In the face of Islamic expansionism, "infidel" countries, such as Brazil, before allowing their institutions to accept free Korans, should be asking basic questions about the underlying Islamic agenda.

Of course Brazil is no stranger to religious infiltration; American evangelicals have been busy reducing Catholic influence there for decades. However, as opposed to Islam, there is reciprocity and relative openness with evangelism; Catholics are free to practice and preach in the U.S. and other western countries.

This is not the case with Islam. While the Saudis feel entitled to finance the spread of Islam in the West, they allow no reciprocal rights to other faiths. Saudi Arabia acting under the dictate of the Koran and Islamic law bans the practice of any faith other than Islam.

In virtually every Islamic nation, non-Muslim minorities occupy second-class status and live in fear and insecurity. Under Islamic Shariah law, a non-Muslim may not even testify against a Muslim. Therefore, while Muslims ceremoniously donate the Koran in Brazil, Muslim countries offer no rights, or second-class citizenship at best, to non-Muslim minorities.

Before well-meaning Brazilian intellectuals and politicians accept free copies of the Koran, they need to ponder over these moral and human rights contradictions and ask some difficult questions. Countries like Saudi Arabia, which exploit western liberalism and have the gall to donate Korans in Brazil, should be stopped and challenged over their treatment of non-Muslims.

Would Saudi Arabia allow, for example, Brazilian bishops to donate the Christian bible in Mecca? No and since it never will, why then does Brazil extend this right to Islam?

The courage to ask these questions requires setting aside the culture of political correctness and moral relativity that pervades the western liberal intelligensia. Western passivity in the face of Islam's soft power makes a mockery of all concepts of universal human rights and equality.

It is an urgent matter of self respect and self preservation that the people of Brazil, and the West in general, ask these critical questions instead of allowing intellectually dishonest academics and self-serving politicians to jeopardize their country's political and cultural well-being.

Paolo Bassi is an attorney in Colorado.  He was raised in Europe and has visited Brazil and fell in love with the country and its people.  He is very interested in the social aspects of football and how it helps to define certain groups of people.  Bassi has also written on politics and culture. He can be reached at This e-mail address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it .

Comments (464)Add Comment
...
written by Guest, June 15, 2006

so the distribution of one book will jeoparadize brazil's cultural and political well being
how so? are brazilian really that stupid or you are just overly paranoid...are you a jew?
I think you should go back to US and put your efforts banning books over there, brazil is an open minded socity and we accept everyone's views....
PS : what do you think about the treatment of non jews in israel? any thoughts?
Reply
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
You know, everyone talks about Christian 'openness' and Christian values etc. As a Muslim, it sounds very appealing, until one looks at Christian History and all the mind-boggling massacres conducted by Christians eg Crusades, Holocaust, annihilation of indigineous Indians (apparently 120 million+).

instead of telling us how civilised you are, why don't you expand on the dark side of your Christian History
Ironic
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Last I knew you couldn't even take a Bible into Saudi Arabia. And, imagine a western Embassy distributing Bibles there. How long would that last?

And, when will the Muslim countries allow Evangelists to create Christian schools for all those lost souls!?!

As to this fellows comment about the Crusades, it was unfortunate but that happened 700 years ago...

And, last I knew, Hitler didn't kill Jews in the name of Christianity. There's a huge difference between a "christian" committing a crime and using religion to commit crimes.

BTW - this is not meant as an attack on your faith - just your comments!
...
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
--You know, everyone talks about Christian 'openness' and Christian values etc. As a Muslim, it sounds very appealing, until one looks at Christian History and all the mind-boggling massacres conducted by Christians ---

Yawn.

And here we go. Another uneducated blind-follower comparing current 21st century Islam, with Christianity from 300 years ago, or a madman during world war 2.

Well there my child, you seem to be completely ignoring the entire secular part of the world that is equally PISSED OFF with the antics of a rouge religion and their legions of ignorant followers. You see, most of us atheists were actually quite open minded to understanding the fears and trepidations of a culture striving for acceptance. We listened, and foolishly agreed, to liberal academics that said we had only ourselves to blame for the fanatics that permeate your faith. This is all changing. Liberal-bafflegab and doubletalk in this matter is being eclipsed by the reality we witness on a daily basis. We no longer need to listen to those who steer us wrong on our understanding of Islam (which includes those from your faith that constantly harp on about Islam being “the religion of peace”), we’ve be given several healthy doses of RECENT reality to come to our own conclusions. And sorry to say this, but please just piss OFF and leave us alone.

If you want to stick your head in the sand and waffle on about the Christians of the past, be my guest. Regardless of their history, I do not fear a follower of their God strapping explosives to themselves in this day and age. Yet as recently as last week, 17 followers of the “religion of peace” (Trade mark: loony planet) were arrested after planning a terrorist attack in one of the most liberal, secular and accepting nations on Earth: CANADA. I can’t seem to remember ANY other religious fanatics, whether Christian, Catholic, Jewish or Buddhist trying this in recent times.

Least we not forget the Danish cartoon riots. That alone was proof enough for most that we’re dealing with an incredibly delinquent and dangerously rouge religion, the followers of which – or at least a terrifyingly large percentage – being equally dangerous and insidious. They do not want to be left alone, they want to CHANGE western ideals. Again, please piss off.

Sure, there are followers of Islam that are not terrorists nor fanatics, but WHERE ARE THEY? They remain quite silent after terrorist attacks, and only rear their swords and open their mouths when, say, a cartoonist decides to make a valid political statement about the new LACK of freedom of expression in a multicultural society because of fools like you, and now HE, in HIS OWN COUNTRY needs to live in fear of being lynched by loonies. The Dutch filmmaker Van Gough wasn’t even given the chance to hide; he was murdered outright for making a political message about Islam. Even sadder, his death was celebrated by many in the “religion of Peace”.

You’ve all gone too far. If Brazil let’s this continue, the country will suffer as a consequence – this has been proven in every nation on earth that has opened it’s doors. Brazil should nip this in the bud, along with other nations that had their good faith and openness shoved back into their faces and take the stance that Australia is now taking.

Read on.

THREE CHEERS FOR AUSTRALIA

Muslims who want to live under Islamic Sharia law were told on Wednesday to get out of Australia, as the government targeted radicals in a bid to head off potential terror attacks.

A day after a group of mainstream Muslim leaders pledged loyalty to Australia at a special meeting with Prime Minister John Howard, he and his ministers made it clear that extremists would face a crackdown.

Treasurer Peter Costello, seen as heir apparent to Howard, hinted that some radical clerics could be asked to leave the country if they did not accept that Australia was a secular state and its laws were made by parliament.


"If those are not your values, if you want a country which has Sharia law or a theocratic state, then Australia is not for you," he said on national television.

"I'd be saying to clerics who are teaching that there are two laws governing people in Australia, one the Australian law and another the Islamic law, that is false. If you can't agree with parliamentary law, independent courts, democracy, and would prefer Sharia law and have the opportunity to go to another country, which practices it, perhaps, then, that's a better option," Costello said.

Asked whether he meant radical clerics would be forced to leave, he said those with dual citizenship could possibly be asked to move to the other country.


Education Minister Brendan Nelson later told reporters that Muslims who did not want to accept local values should "clear off".

"Basically, people who don't want to be Australians, and they don't want to live by Australian values and understand them, well then they can basically clear off," he said. Separately, Howard angered some Australian Muslims on Wednesday by saying he supported spy agencies monitoring the nation's mosques.
Wonderful!
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Islam is just what Brasil needs! Since WWII, countries dominated by Islam, a quarter of the world's population? have generated about 500 itellectual and scientific patents. In the same length of time, South Korea, as tiny as it is, has listed over 5,000! Wow, on the outside, Brazil's ineptness and inability to progress will have prepared it well for Islam.
Desertifivation?
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Oh, now it all makes sense! That's why the earlier articles about Brzil turning into a desert! The Arabs and Islam is coming.
A is for Arab!
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Is this why the previous article about goats? I can't stop laughing. This is too good to be true!
...
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
"are brazilian really that stupid or you are just overly paranoid?"

Was that a rhetorical question?

"Are you a jew?"

Are you a muslim?

Idiot!
What\'s the difference?
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
What's the difference if a person is a Jew or muslim. They are both idiots. Leave Brasil alone.
FREE KORANS
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
For the information of some people christians have massacred hundreds of millions and this was not 300 years ago, 150 million were massacred in ww1 and ww2.
tens of millions have been nassacrd since ww2 by anerican christians and recently tens of thousands are being massacred in iraq by the saviour of christianity President george bush who says god told him to invade.
another f**k american
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
trying to put the finger in brazil. let islam come, i want my 4 wives.
the truth
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
my countri have the most great biodiversiti in human races on world tath is wath we will do.we will prove to world tath is possible read a book and not be mesmerized .we are great and if ioy think one other religion is danger wath i will do with milions of persons on sate of bahia,the african reliogions we are in peace even with the evangelical exported byu united states to divide our countrie ,im afraid the evangelicals be on power,and like other evangelical president my president lead my people to war or a preventive wars.we have a lot of arabas living on the country its a secular population do you think they not read the alcorão :i am a catholic,my boss is maçon,hes wife is of candonble and hes sons is evangelicals and we not fight because all of us knows is stupid discuss about religion is diferents points of wiew and no changes.]
Oh, Please!
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Iraq vs. Iran, Irag vs. Kuwait, Jordan vs. Palestinians, Lybia vs. Sudan, Egypt vs. Yemen, Syria vs. Jordan, Samalia vs. itself! Oh, please, this is a big world, and religions and despots need hobbies. Nobody's perfect, it's just that the stupid Chritians enjoy war on a larger scale than everyone else. Hrll, if you can afford a B-52 rather than a camel, can you blame them? 4 wives, sounds nice! Count me in!
Behind Free Koran Distribution in Brazil
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
DONT ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS? LET'S HAVE ANOTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WERE PEOPLE DON'T GIVE A s**t ABOUT HUMAN LIFE, STRAP BOMBS TO THEMSELVES TO BLOW UP WOMEN AND CHILDREN.GO FIGURE.
guest
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
The critical difference between islamic and Christian wrong-doings is that Christians have killed in the name of their faith but no-where does Chrsitainity teach hatred and killing.

Muslims hate and kill others because islam teaches them to do this.

Muslims must take agood hard look at the morality of their teachings and have the courage to change.
\"Religion of Peace\"
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Yeah, quite a peaceful religion, that Islam: a passage in the Koran instructs readers to pour molten metal down the throats of non-believers.

Can't these people just evolve already? What a bunch of derelects!
\"Religion of Peace\"
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Yeah, quite a peaceful religion, that Islam: a passage in the Koran instructs readers to pour molten metal down the throats of non-believers.

Can't these people just evolve already? What a bunch of derelects!
Re: Christians and Massacres
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
True Christians have never been involved in the wars or killing santioned by the Catholic Church. True Christians if you remember died in the Coloseum of roam for their non-violent beliefs. The founder of true Christianity, Jesus Christ was Crusified for his non-violent beliefs.

Just who are these "so called Christians that you are all railing about?

THEY ARE CHRISTIANS IN NAME ONLY!
...
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
By the way, has anyone heard of someone named Saladin?

I think he was the Arab Crusader who started this land taking mess in the first place!

Ancient Babylon was involved in conquest long before the Roman Empire came to power.

Therefore a case can be made that Arabs have been killing, slaving, and taking much longer than Whites Christians!
author
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
I wrote this article. I am appalled that whenever Islam is criticized, Muslims and their defenders start talking about Israel and the crusades, in order to silence debate on Islam.

I in no way support Israeli policies over the Palestinians. However, this is a political and human righst issue. Israeli policies do not mean we cannot have a fair and frank discussion over Islam.

Secondly the crusades were violent acts done in the name of christ. However, the crusades did NOT happen until 450 years after Muslim arabs had started an unprovoked jihad and conquererd the middle east, iran, north africa etc. The first crusade was done by Islam...europe did not respond for 450 years until about 1100. Lets get the facts straight. It was Islam that attacked the world, not the other way around.
Re: pour molten metal down
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Proof positive of human authorship! God just sends a burst of fire at you and you're gone--these guys have to do it themselves!
Re: tath is wath
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Somebody please tell me what this guy is saying here!
Re: THREE CHEERS FOR AUSTRALIA
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Those Aussies got some guts!
Australians!
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
First country to defeat Hitler and Germany in a battle during WWII. They did it while assigned to the British in North Africa.
First country to defeat the Japanese in a battle at Miline Bay.
They were country with the most casualties per capita during WW!, and they weren't even involved in it. They wiped out one third of the Japanese invasion force attacking Singapore with only 13 airplanes, when the British didn't even know there was a war going on. Yeah, they call themselves pacifists, but they know losers when they see them. That's more than Brazil can admit. Three more cheers for the Aussies!
...
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
christianity doesn't teach that all non-christians are "infidels" and must be converted to chritianity, islam does.

Here is a news article from yesterday about the Bali bombings in which 202 innocent people were murdered.

"Bali bombings God's will: Bashir
By Rob Taylor in Ngruki, Central Java
June 15, 2006
THOSE killed in the 2002 Bali bombings had been destined to die by God, radical Muslim cleric Abu Bakar Bashir said today.
The families they have left behind should now convert to Islam, he said.

Conversion would give the bereaved relatives "salvation and peace".

"For the Bali bomb families, those who are non-Muslims, my suggestion is just convert to Islam so they can be saved and find some peace from Allah," he said at his home inside his Ngruki Islamic boarding school near the city of Solo in Central Java.

Bashir was released from a Jakarta jail yesterday after serving 25 months for his association with the 2002 Bali bomb blasts, that killed 202 people among them 88 Australians.

But he denies any involvement in terrorism or allegations that he is the spiritual head of militant group Jemaah Islamiah.

He said the families of the dead should understand that they were killed by bombs, not bombers, and that it was "God's will".

Earlier Bashir called on Australian Prime Minister John Howard to convert to Islam or face eternity in hell."


I especially liked this quote:

" He said the families of the dead should understand that they were killed by bombs, not bombers, and that it was "God's will"."

So I guess that the U.S. can use this same excuse?

That the people in Iraq were killed by bombs, not the bombers?? That it was "gods will".

Islam a religion of peace? (Believe it or else!!)



I think this idea was great
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
"pure cultural exchanges are based upon mutual respect and reciprocity."

Good one doutor.


...
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Wife Beating: Good Enough for Muhammad, Good Enough for You

Verse 4:34 of the Qur'an is a challenge for
contemporary Muslim apologists in the West.




The three major translations of the Qur'an from Arabic into English by Muslims were completed early in the 20th century. Though working independently, each translator came to the same conclusion concerning verse 4:34 - namely that it commands husbands to beat their wives in a manner that causes pain - if the circumstances agree. This agrees with the traditional interpretation that Islamic clerics have held since the time of Muhammad. After all, the Qur'an plainly states that men are in charge of women.

Enter the modern age, when wife-beating isn't as trendy as it used to be, and suddenly contemporary Muslim apologists living in Judeo-Christian societies are having epiphanies as to the original meaning of verse 4:34. Apparently the true intention of the verse was hidden from Islamic scholars and ordinary Muslims for fourteen centuries and it is only now coming to light that hitting a woman for any reason is "completely against Islam," which coincides, curiously enough, with the popular revulsion for such a practice (at least in the West).

Muhammad used the Arabic word 'idribuhunna' in the verse, which is derived from 'daraba' and usually does mean "to beat." Another derivation, however, means "to go abroad," which leaves our desperate apologist with an exit strategy, it seems. This is what Muhammad must have truly meant, they tell us. If a man can't get his little woman to come to her senses, then he should move out of his own house and back in with his parents until she does.

Sure, sure. This sounds like Islam, doesn't it? The religion that sprang out of the harsh Arabian Peninsula to lay waste to an ever-widening swath of homes, fields and hapless populations with shocking brutality, the religion that cannibalized entire cultures and turned vibrant people into terrorized, subordinate slaves and dhimmis... is really just intended to bring out the Alan Alda in your man after a hard day of pillaging.

But how realistic is it that Muhammad, who taught that women should be made to share their marital bed with three other wives at their husband's discretion (but stoned for adultery), who established the "triple talaq" rule that a woman can be thrown out of the house at any time, who did not disapprove of his men raping women captured in battle... how likely is it that Muhammad would be telling a man to move out of the house rather than use physical force to keep his woman in line?

Not likely. Not likely at all.

Fortunately, we don't have to guess at what Muhammad's position on wife-beating actually was and which meaning of 'daraba' he intended, since the Hadith records at least one instance in which he struck his own (underage) wife in the chest while she was lying in bed. This would be Aisha, his favorite wife, and he did so because she left the house without his permission. Now, if he treated his favorite wife this way, one can only imagine how he might have acted toward his other wives, concubines and slaves.

Naturally, the apologists leave this little tidbit out of their arguments. Neither do they educate their audience of another case that is recorded in one of Islam's most sacred books in which a woman came to Muhammad for help after being beaten so badly by her husband that "her skin was greener than her clothes." The prophet simply rebuked the woman and sent her back to her man with explicit instructions to have more sex.

Look, we're all in favor of Muslims bringing their religion out of the 7th century, but if this can only be done through strategic omission and fringe sophistry, then we have to ask what is the point of salvaging Islam? Why not just pick another religion that's closer to what you want Islam to be?

Oh, that's right the Religion of Peace threatens murder for anyone who leaves.

Never has this means of intimidation been more necessary than in the information age, when many Muslims are learning for the first time about the history and true teachings of their religion, and how poorly it contrasts with others.

[Additional Note (5-19-06) - Not all Western Muslims are as intent on disguising their religion with slight-of-hand. The multilingual site, IslamQA.com is quite blunt about the four conditions under which a husband may beat his wife:

Discipline. The husband has the right to discipline his wife if she disobeys him in something good, not if she disobeys him in something sinful, because Allaah has enjoined disciplining women by forsaking them in bed and by hitting them, when they do not obey.

The Hanafis mentioned four situations in which a husband is permitted to discipline his wife by hitting her. These are: not adorning herself when he wants her to; not responding when he calls her to bed and she is taahirah (pure, i.e., not menstruating); not praying; and going out of the house without his permission.


http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/Articles/WifeBeating.htm
Excellent article !
written by Guest, June 16, 2006


Simpyl the truth is told....for once !

By the way, who believes that the Muslims will accept the Bible translated from Portuguese into
Arabic ?

Knowing that the Muslims far outnumbers the Brazilians, this is millions of copies you should offer them !

Do you think that the Muslims will accept and appreciate such a gift ??????
So why do you ????
You are quite cheap, and without self esteem......contrary to the Muslims !
...
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
So you think the Ku Klux Klan and the Spanish Inquisition are bad?

So do we, but...
Put the Numbers in Perspective


More people are killed by Islamists each year than in all 350 years of the Spanish Inquisition combined. (source)

Islamic terrorists murder more people every day than the Ku Klux Klan has in the last 50 years. (source)

More civilians were killed by Muslim extremists in two hours on September 11th than in the 36 years of sectarian conflict in Northern Ireland. (source)

19 Muslim hijackers killed more innocents in two hours on September 11th than the number of American criminals put to death in the last 65 years. (source)

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/

I can now beat my wife?
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Become a muslim and beat my wife? Wow! Islam offers hope to backwards peoples everywhere!
...
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
It's all about Iraq, isn't it?

Yep, it's all about Iraq and...

India and the Sudan and Algeria and Afghanistan and New York and Pakistan and Israel and Russia and Chechnya and the Philippines and Indonesia and Nigeria and England and Thailand and Spain and Egypt and Bangladesh and Saudi Arabia and Ingushetia and Dagestan and Turkey and Kabardino-Balkaria and Morocco and Yemen and Lebanon and France and Uzbekistan and Gaza and Tunisia and Kosovo and Bosnia and Mauritania and Kenya and Eritrea and Syria and Somalia and California and Kuwait and Virginia and Ethiopia and Iran and Jordan and United Arab Emirates and Louisiana and Texas and Tanzania and Germany and Pennsylvania and Belgium and Denmark and East Timor and Qatar and Maryland and Tajikistan and the Netherlands and Scotland and Chad and Canada and...

...and pretty much wherever Muslims believe their religion tells them to:

"Fight and slay the Unbelievers wherever ye find them. Seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem of war."
Qur'an, Sura 9:5
Christianity
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
Remember, Christianity created the Western world, not the other way around. And Western civilization has a nasty habit of biting back at encrouchments, in a bad way. History has proven this. The further the Western world is antagonized by the muslims, the more wraith will build. Western anger may be safely behind the dam now, pray it doesn't break by the constant poking and jabbing by the muslim instigations of violence and intolerance.
Let\'s distribute Qurans EVERYWHERE!
written by Guest, June 16, 2006
It's the best way to educate people what a sick religion Islam is. All you have to do is take a bright yellow highlighter and mark all the passages that would offend any human with a sense of justice or compassion. There are many.

Highlight the ones that tell Muslims to kill non-believers, that make women equal to 1/4 the value of a man under the law, to make peace when they are in the minority and to fight to subjigate non-Muslims when they are in the majority. Just look at any Muslim majority country now. A non-Muslim cannot live in peace or speak their mind in any of them.

Don't fall for the whitewash propaganda from Muslims about how Islam is a "Religion of Peace". These web sites are great at exposing Islam for what it truly is:

http://www.faithfreedom.org

http://www.littlegreenfootballs.com

It's not a "religion" of privately held beliefs as most people understand the term "religion". It's more like an "ideology", like Communism that links beliefs with political control, social structure and legal system.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
"are brazilian really that stupid or you are just overly paranoid?"

Was that a rhetorical question?

"Are you a jew?"

Are you a muslim?

Idiot!
Ok,,I am not muslim as the matter of fact I detest all religions, I believe
This world would be better off without religion. Now for me there is no difference
Between a suicide bomber and jew who move to west bank from such peaceful and prosperous countries such as Holland and Sweden risking his and his families life because he believes this land was given to them by god and the christen organization who funds millions of dollars to these jews, why? Because they are waiting for Jesus to come back and he would only come back if Israel under jews control. They are all religious fundamentalists and fanatics. They all should be eliminated

Alex desilva
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
This is a threat all Brazilians- All people in SP- should be careful- islamist are terrorist- When can give the Bible and rosey in Islamic countries- this should be allowed
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
"DONT ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS? LET'S HAVE ANOTHER COUNTRY IN THE WORLD WERE PEOPLE DON'T GIVE A s**t ABOUT HUMAN LIFE, STRAP BOMBS TO THEMSELVES TO BLOW UP WOMEN AND CHILDREN.GO FIGURE."
my question for all you f**k heads like this one...
What is the f**kin difference between smoking innocent women and children from a plane throwing bomb(which American and Israelis are doing for years) and by people blowing themselves up?….all of you are killing innocent people therefore all of you are f**kin murderers muslims, jews and christians , this world is better off without you religious fanatics
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
It's not a question of HOW you kill it's WHO and WHY.

The Muslim terrorists and the millions of Muslims who tacitly support them kill innocent civilians because they are of a different religion. Whenever Americans and Israelis purposefully kill innocent civilians because of their religion, it is equally wrong! But unless you're a conspiracy theorist, they are not doing this. (Unless you count those Marines who if found guilty will be COURT MARSHALLED).

Hamas, on the other hand, has it is written into their governing charter their goal of killing every last Jew and taking over Israel. Israel has the military power to destroy every Palestinian in less than a week, yet they don't do it! Give a Palestinian a nuke and see how long it takes her to blow up Israel.
Muslims where are you now?
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Notice that the Muslim apologists seem to have stopped posting after we quoted from their nasty book...

I guess they counted on us being as ignorant and gullible as we were 5 years ago, before they declared open war, and we started studying up.
Shezacat
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Do the persons recieving the Koran understand that if they drop it, or dispose of it in any way that they will jeopardize their very lives? Now THAT'S a 'peaceful religion! Give it back, or refuse it before something awful happens.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
"True Christians have never been involved in the wars or killing santioned by the Catholic Church. True Christians if you remember died in the Coloseum of roam for their non-violent beliefs. The founder of true Christianity, Jesus Christ was Crusified for his non-violent beliefs.

Just who are these "so called Christians that you are all railing about?

THEY ARE CHRISTIANS IN NAME ONLY!"

YES I agree with you poster. People who think first of their profits are not actual christians, and that is exactly what happened with the crusades and other "christian wars" like WWI/II and what is happening in middle east for example. Although they all claim Christian beliefs they are being manipulators. Christian faith has nothing to do with selfish benefits. I thought the Christian faith said that Christ would come when every soul on earth has heard about Christ’s justice (e.g. God), am I wrong?
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
continuing above
I think that the current “Christian” policies that furnish money to Israel are not focusing on religious matters. They are occupied with the geopolitical control of Middle rich-of-petroleum East. Just as back in the 80’s when governments not related exclusively to the “Christianity” provided money to them and in the late 40’s they enabled the foundation of the Israeli state. But, yes religions are something to be very carefully thought, religions for their own sake are not important as like some one here said it’s not the color of the skin that matters but personal qualities, it’s not the religion that matters but personal qualities.
WOMEN IN ISLAM
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
It seems a lot of people seem to care a lot for muslim women, i think you should take care of your own women first, in america around 800,000 women are raped every year, yet the conviction rate is less than 10 per cent.millions of women are beaten and assaulted every year,some of the biggest whore houses are in america and you call this christianity.
A muslim husband has the right to reprimand his wife if she is debasing her self or her husband by first verbally informing her of what she has done,if she still persists then he has the option of not sleeping in the same bed, if she still persists in her ways then he can admonish her by using a twig or miswaq which is the size of a normal pen to tap her on the arm ,shoulder or hands he cannot
touch the face, if she still persists then divorce is decreed in a muslim family the welfare of the children are parmount so that they can be bought up with a mother and father and lead a stable life not become psycologically scarred.
one of the signs of christianity today is the breakdown of marriage which is leading to psycologically scared children who turn to drugs and alcohol, a lot of children are turning away from marriage to homosexuality and lesbianism.
today more eductaed women are becoming muslims in europe then men it does not matter how much islam is vilified the truth shall prevail,western civilisation is based on islams 1000 years of islamic discovery and inventions when the according to western historians europe was in the dark ages, it was dark for europe but no the world.
ever since the emrgence of modern western civilisation it has been massacring humanity in the hundreds of millions and still persists in massacring humanity and robbing other nations.
Not all muslims are terrorists.
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
It's just that most all terrorists are Muslims.
Bible and Koran
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
I am a guy with some education and I had the opportunity to travel around the world. I visited Indonesia. I went in a book store in Surabaya and in Jakarta. The books are Bible and Koran, one side Koran and another side Bible.
So, what is the point about Koran in Brazil. Let Brazilian get some education. Perhaps, if women in Brazil become Muslin will be less bitches.
Ed
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
"Bring Koran on" and "smoke korans out"
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Quote:

"You know, everyone talks about Christian 'openness' and Christian values etc. As a Muslim, it sounds very appealing, until one looks at Christian History and all the mind-boggling massacres conducted by Christians eg Crusades, Holocaust, annihilation of indigineous Indians (apparently 120 million+).

instead of telling us how civilised you are, why don't you expand on the dark side of your Christian History"


Reply:

I haven't read other replies below this on, I just wanted to reply to this real quick, and I would like to point out I do not wish to turn this into a Christian vs Muslim debate.

But being that Islam immediately began military, political, and social expansion very early on in her birth, to the point of conquering most the quoted "known world" it is quite ironic that one does not refer to their far better and all encompassing terrestial expansion as a "crusade." The quoted Christian Crusaders only held *towns* unlike Islam that created a virtual terrestial empire (centuries before Christianity went to war for the cross).

The Holocaust is ironic you mention too, not just because it was secular ideological driven thing, but also because you skip over the Armenian genocide that opened the 20th century. Which was Muslims attempting to drive out Christian ethnic Armenians.

The Amerindian thing surely Christians have accountability for, but likewise does *secular* government. For example, it was not the Pilgrims that slaughtered Indians, it was U.S. Army regulars. It was the stuanch "seperation of church and state" secular government that drove Indians from the travals of the Trail of Tears to "Indian Reservations."

In Latin America the Church was the primary protector of Amerindians from the crown and European adeventures.


History is multilayered, as well filled with much fiction, that 12 people on court jury can'e be sure of recent events in recent crimes with extensive testimony, it is doubtful people today can be 100% certain about historical events that occured a century or more. Unfortunately most people recieve their historical information from gossip per pop tv and slick covered magazines not bias free.

My own personal belief is that one can never be 100% accurate about history, one can only be less accurate or more accurate about history.


Having said that... I fully support not only understanding about Islam into Brazil, but full throttle expansion of Islam into Brazil as well as into the UK and the United States.
The expansion of Islam
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
equals the loss of freedom. Noth USA's corny version of freedom that it uses as a punch line, but the actual meaning that every man AND woman has the right to lead his or her life the way he or she pleases. This type of idea makes a muslim cringe. Did you read the post above about the nut job that went through the steps of correcting his disobedient wife, as if there are no untrustworthy, deranged husbands?! A world of Islam would be a bland and awful place, just like the countries dominated by muslim governments. Ever been to one of those? Did you notice how many of those countries' citiznes are migrating to Western countries, where they are happy to leach off of the Western country's social system but refuse to particpiate in society? WHat a bunch of parasites! Islam is a religion of insecurity. If it isn't, then why do muslims insist that everyone else MUST belive what they belive? WHy can't they live and let live?
Islam is a FRAUD!
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Islam is, was and always will be a complete fraud.

It was used by Mohammed as a political instrument to gain power over people and expand his desire for wealth and power.

And he did it in the most ruthless way one can imagine, he was no saint by any means.
re: Bible and Koran
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
I am a guy with some education and I had the opportunity to travel around the world. I visited Indonesia. I went in a book store in Surabaya and in Jakarta. The books are Bible and Koran, one side Koran and another side Bible.
So, what is the point about Koran in Brazil. Let Brazilian get some education. Perhaps, if women in Brazil become Muslin will be less bitches

What you mean, you think it is easier brazilian women become muslim than american women, Is that what you mean?! Grrr...
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
"Whenever Americans and Israelis purposefully kill innocent civilians because of their religion, it is equally wrong! But unless you're a conspiracy theorist, they are not doing this"

Have you been living on the moon? Are you really that blind or you think other
People are brain dead, if you really think that jews are killing in isreal not for religion
you need brain replacement (if there is such a thing)….

"Islam is, was and always will be a complete fraud.
It was used by Mohammed as a political instrument to gain power over people and expand his desire for wealth and power. "

I agree with you 100 percent, but it’s not only mohammad jesus, mosses and others who claims to be prophetess , they all wanted power over people…
Every religion is a fraud


comment
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
WOMEN IN ISLAM
It seems a lot of people seem to care a lot for muslim women, i think you should take care of your own women first, in america around 800,000 women are raped every year, yet the conviction rate is less than 10 per cent.millions of women are beaten and assaulted every year,some of the biggest whore houses are in america and you call this christianity.
A muslim husband has the right to reprimand his wife if she is debasing her self or her husband by first verbally informing her of what she has done,if she still persists then he has the option of not sleeping in the same bed, if she still persists in her ways then he can admonish her by using a twig or miswaq which is the size of a normal pen to tap her on the arm ,shoulder or hands he cannot
touch the face, if she still persists then divorce is decreed in a muslim family the welfare of the children are parmount so that they can be bought up with a mother and father and lead a stable life not become psycologically scarred.
one of the signs of christianity today is the breakdown of marriage which is leading to psycologically scared children who turn to drugs and alcohol, a lot of children are turning away from marriage to homosexuality and lesbianism.
today more eductaed women are becoming muslims in europe then men it does not matter how much islam is vilified the truth shall prevail,western civilisation is based on islams 1000 years of islamic discovery and inventions when the according to western historians europe was in the dark ages, it was dark for europe but no the world.
ever since the emrgence of modern western civilisation it has been massacring humanity in the hundreds of millions and still persists in massacring humanity and robbing other nations.

This comment was very informing and shows how islam can be misunderstood.
OIL ! OIL OIL !
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Quite strange that almost all the largest oil producing coun tries are from Muslims countries.

Quite strange that with so much wealth....there is so much poverty...in their own countries.

Quite strange that these same countries dont provide high education but rather go the other countries Universities.

Simply stated, what do they do with all that money ????
I suppose they do the same as in Brazil : eveything for the minority and the rest for the majority !

Even look at Venezuela and Chavez, it is the fifth or so oil producing country, but the poverty rate is very high, all due because most of the oil money goes into a few pockets through corruption.

Same for Brazil. A country quite rich in land, weather, water, basic commodities but.......so poor for the vast majority of the population.

In a certain way, the philosophy of South America and Muslim countries are quite similar.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
"Having said that... I fully support not only understanding about Islam into Brazil, but full throttle expansion of Islam into Brazil as well as into the UK and the United States."

Well if you are a Muslim of course you support the expansion of Islam unto the entire world! And if you are not a Muslim, why aren't you? Since you think it should expand everywhere.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
"islams 1000 years of islamic discovery and inventions when the according to western historians europe was in the dark ages, it was dark for europe but no the world. "

Ahaha.... if the Islamic world is so sich with discovery and invention why is every Muslim country the backwater of the world? The most intolerant of the world? Why do they emigrate in DROVES to the wicked Western countries you so despise? If you think Islamic countries are so wonderful then STAY THERE OR GO THERE. We don't want you here and we don't want our countries to become like yours. If you assimilated when you came to our countries it would be a different story, but you don't! You come and you demand for us to change, like a rude and disrespectful visitor.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Quote:

"equals the loss of freedom. Noth USA's corny version of freedom that it uses as a punch line, but the actual meaning that every man AND woman has the right to lead his or her life the way he or she pleases. This type of idea makes a muslim cringe. Did you read the post above about the nut job that went through the steps of correcting his disobedient wife, as if there are no untrustworthy, deranged husbands?! A world of Islam would be a bland and awful place, just like the countries dominated by muslim governments. Ever been to one of those? Did you notice how many of those countries' citiznes are migrating to Western countries, where they are happy to leach off of the Western country's social system but refuse to particpiate in society? WHat a bunch of parasites! Islam is a religion of insecurity. If it isn't, then why do muslims insist that everyone else MUST belive what they belive? WHy can't they live and let live?"


Reply:

I've been to Dubai and Abu Dabi. Nice places, not exactly as culturally lose as say Chicago, New York, or what you would find in London or Rio de Janeiro, but they were nice and clean cities anyways. Dubai actually is a playground for rich Arabs, Thais, and even Brits.

Islam is not as bad as you make it out to be. True it is more Puritan than the other 4 religions of the 5 Great Religions, but Islam is by no measure "bland."
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Quote:

"western civilisation is based on islams 1000 years of islamic discovery and inventions when the according to western historians europe was in the dark ages, it was dark for europe."


Reply:

The term "dark ages" is just a result of hyper bias by some historians. Northern Europe was never uppity cultured, literate, or brimming with science before Rome was sacked.

Much of what Islamic cultures learned they learned from Eastern Christians in the Middle East and Africa and from Hindu India. The "Arab numerals" we use in the West actually come from Hindu India, the West just recievied it by ways of Islam.

The West slowly progressed in technology and learning as time went on. Northern Europe was in many ways more advanced in in 900 CE than it was in 200 CE. And not all of the Islamic world was advanced in the East, namely in much of Black Africa. By the time the Europeans arrived in Africa encountering the Black Islamic kingdoms, many of those Islamic kingdoms were populated by peoples that walked around bare foot, ball head, and far technologically behind the Western Europeans.

Originally most the Arab trobal peoples were very unlearned peoples, kind of like the Northern Europeans in the early centuries CE. So it is to Islamic and Christian credit that under their respective nurture both regional groups began to appreciate greater culture and learning. Due to Islams location, closer to the learned and cultured civilizations in the Middle East and Eastern Africa, arguably they became much more rapidly affected by civilized culture ans learning than Northern European Christians did.
Autehntic Muslins
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
I am a Christian.

Let the real Muslins come to Brazil. They have more respect for Christ than many Christians I know.

Besides, there are things we can learn from them, good things. I have a copy of the Koran home and I, once in while, do read their scriptures and compare with the Bible.

I have a friend who is Muslin and he is one the finest person I have met.

A real Muslin is a good person, kind and friendly not those fanatics that act as if they stand for God.



Hitler\'s Muslims.
written by Guest, June 17, 2006
Real Christians and Jews could not serve in Hitler and Himmler's SS. But real Muslims could! That has always been an intresting bid of history that few note.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
quote:

"Perhaps, if women in Brazil become Muslin will be less bitches."

LOL...what an idiot! Obviously you aren't familiar with brazilian culture, and obviously not familiar with brazilian women.

Try telling a brazilian women she needs her husbands permission to leave the house! And if she does so without permission that her husband has the right to beat the s**t out of her....lol.

Not only that, but if she commits adultery she can be stoned to death!

Brazil would run out of rocks!
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
How stupid. !!
How old are you , son?
Go back to your middle school homework.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
Some of Hitler´s generals were jews.
Ignorant people are a shame.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
Some others were homosexuals. You never heard about it, right?
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
I am going to get my copy. I am a Brazilian and I am far from being an American robot.
There is no 1984 atmosphere in Brazil. Brazil is a democratic country and you can read jew books and muslim books.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
The Iraq war is the cause of an increase in neurotic population in the USA.
When they come back home, they have no more a job, they are terribly neurotic. Many of them have killed their wives (their wives and their children ). That´s why you can read stupid things on this nazi site.
Amerrica uber alles.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
If I were to choose between a muslim and a fake American christian I would throw the American into a garbage dumping area.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
Beware. Would you trust a people that blows up civilians, old people, women, whatever, when they are just celebrating a wedding party?
Do you know what they say their religion is???
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
Blue for greed - White for desguise - Red for blood, much blood.
Stars for invaded countries.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
An invincible ditto: Amerrrica uber alles.
To the slew of bulls**t quotes above
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
Judging all of America based on the actions of a president that barely half of the population voted for and that less than half of the people currently aprove of, along with a bunch of backwoods rednecks, shows your disturbing ignorance. Get educated. Go to New York City some time and then start spouting off that stupid s**t.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
Brilliant Quote -

“I am going to get my copy. I am a Brazilian and I am far from being an American robot.
There is no 1984 atmosphere in Brazil. Brazil is a democratic country and you can read jew books and muslim books.”

Humble reply –

Ah, once again we’re blessed to bear witness to that ever so prominent Brasilian intellect and sharp lucidity. This is a paramount example of why Brasil is leading the world in academic research, technological advancement, global astuteness and sheer intellectual prowess. We should be honored that there is a site such as this, so that us mere simple gringos can bask off the radiant glow that is the brilliant Brasilian mind at work: a mind so fertile in organized ideas, so rich in historical and factual knowledge and so unquestionably surpassing to all of us in every synapse related facet. Ah, yes – the Brasilian genius: be proud that s/he has taken a moment from their busy work-filled and academically challenging day to bring us a small smattering of their sagacity and perspicacity. I cherish living in Brasil, for you see, not a day goes by when I am not awe-struck by the vast superiority of this culture’s mental capacity to sift through crap and practically place and organize complicated ideas in a digestible form for us dumb gringos.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
Quote:

"I am a Christian.

Let the real Muslins come to Brazil. They have more respect for Christ than many Christians I know."


Reply:

Haha! smilies/cheesy.gif

This is probably pretty true. Muslims have extreme respect for all the prophets. And for some reason their women are perhaps the most loyal women on earth to their men and religious culture. Which boggles my mind, given the fact Muslim men can marry like 4 wives and non Muslim women, but Muslim women *can only marry* Muslim men and only have one husband. The roles between men and women are much more marked in Islam culture and society, plus the women are much more compelled to be modest in dress and behavior. Yet for some reason they are by-in-large phenominally more loyal to that from which they came and to that which they call their own.

I have much admiration for Islamic women. Not because of their modesty in dress and more submissive social role, because I'm quite the fan of the Brazilian bikini and tight jeans smilies/cheesy.gif, as well I like women sharing a social and sexual equality with me. However - at least with Catholic women and secular women - they are some of the most untrust worthy women on the face of the planet. Their own children in their womb can't trust them to bring them to birth. They cheat, lie, thieve, conspire to murder, manipulate, always want more more more, and will never take an inch of responsibility for any thing.

Personally I welcome Islam coming. Something has to be true and good about Islam just by essence of the fidelity of their women.

And yes a religion can be judged by its women (not just its men).

...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
So was the white plantation master married to the black woman that he had children with or was she a slave? Some people here discuss irrelevent issues. Are Brazilians still slaves or free people. I still believe that there is a white upper class in Brazil. You can mention many bad things about muslims but let me mention this incident.In the days when slavery was open (not hidden like these days) Bilal a black slave at the time of the muslims prophet was owned by a rich man who hated that his slave had coverted to islam. He offered to sell him so that he could be a free man to the muslims who were small in number and relatively poor for a price much higher than his value. The muslims agreed. The rich man laughed and said if you offered me much less i would have accepted. The muslim who paid the money said if you asked for 100 times that amount i would have paid it. Tell me what respect does the white man have for the non white man. Nothing, he wiped out more tribes that were ever recorded in the history books. Took over vast lands, still to this day enjoy the assets of those conquests. While whole continents like africa suffer.
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006
quote:

"Many of them have killed their wives (their wives and their children )."

WTF?? Please,.give us some numbers to back this idiotic statement up or is this just another "rip it out of the ass" factoid?

You f**king people are ignorant. And obviously, dying of jealousy of the united states.

Why else would the U.S. be the target of illegal aliens all over the planet and muslims target the U.S. because we believe that all men, and women, are created equal.

to the idiot that wrote.

"And for some reason their women are perhaps the most loyal women on earth to their men..."

what a f**king retard! Would you be loyal if every now and again when you saw one of the women in your village that committed adultery get stoned to death!!??

Or buried alive??

Want to see pictures??

http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/


Look a quarter of the way down the page....you'll see why muslims have low rates of adultery!

And, if you're muslim, and you want to leave the religion....it's like the f**king mafia, you leave in one way only....in a f**king box!
...
written by Guest, June 18, 2006

Other Religions
Home > Christianity Today Magazine > Churches & Ministries > Other Religions

Christianity Today, January 7, 2002

Is Islam a religion of peace?
The controversy reveals a struggle for the soul of Islam.
By James A. Beverley | posted 12/28/2001

Osama bin Laden, the world's most notorious terrorist, has handed Muslims everywhere their worst public-relations nightmare: September 11 as a picture, an embodiment, of Islam. Muslims now have to define themselves in relation to the day of infamy.

Abdulaziz Sachedina, a Muslim scholar at the University of Virginia, says he does not remember ever praying so earnestly that God would spare Muslims the blame for "such madness that was unleashed upon New York and Washington . …I felt the pain and, perhaps for the first time in my entire life, I felt embarrassed at the thought that it could very well be my fellow Muslims who had committed this horrendous act of terrorism. How could these terrorists invoke God's mercifulness and compassion when they had, through their evil act, put to shame the entire history of this great religion and its culture of toleration?"

Every judgment about Islam, all reaction to Muslim doctrine, and each Muslim-Christian encounter are now cast in light of the events of that dreadful day.

Islam as a Path of Peace
There are three distinct interpretations of the events of September 11. The first view is that the terrorist acts do not represent Islam. President George W. Bush best expressed this notion when he said that "Islam is a religion of peace." One of the leading Muslims to echo this is Yusuf Islam (the former rock musician Cat Stevens, who now helps promote Muslim education in England). "Today, I am aghast at the horror of recent events and feel it a duty to speak out," he said in a London newspaper. "Not only did terrorists hijack planes and destroy life; they also hijacked the beautiful religion of Islam."

During an interfaith ceremony at Yankee Stadium on September 23, Imam Izak-El M. Pasha pleaded, "Do not allow the ignorance of people to have you attack your good neighbors. We are Muslims, but we are Americans. We Muslims, Americans, stand today with a heavy weight on our shoulders that those who would dare do such dastardly acts claim our faith. They are no believers in God at all."

Major Muslim organizations throughout North America, including the Council on American-Islamic Relations, the Islamic Society of North America, and the Muslim Students Association, denounced the work of the terrorists. The powerful American Muslim Council issued a press release on September 11, saying it "strongly condemns this morning's plane attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon and expresses deep sorrow for Americans that were injured and killed. amc sends out its condolences to all the families of the victims of this cowardly terrorist attack."

With the exception of Iraq, Muslim nations distanced themselves from the attack on America. "Iran has vehemently condemned the suicidal terrorist attacks in the United States," Iran Today reported in a front-page story on September 24, "and has expressed its deep sorrow and sympathy with the American nation." The governments of Bahrain, Egypt, Lebanon, Oman, Pakistan, Palestine, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen expressed similar sentiments.

Leading intellectuals, who have argued that terrorist acts represent only fringe Muslims, have also promoted the view that Islam is a religion of peace. Edward Said, the controversial Columbia University professor, argued in The Nation that September 11 is an act of cultic religion. Comparing Islamists to the Branch Davidians and the Rev. Jim Jones, he said September 11 is a model of "the carefully planned and horrendous, pathologically motivated suicide attack and mass slaughter by a small group of deranged militants . …the capture of big ideas by a tiny band of crazed fanatics for criminal purposes."

Mark Juergensmeyer, professor at the University of California at Santa Barbara and a specialist on religious violence, put it similarly: "Osama bin Laden is to Islam [what] Timothy McVeigh is to Christianity."

The Darker Side
After initial emphasis on Islam as a religion of peace, a second interpretation came to the fore. Editorials started to emerge that were less optimistic about Islam per se and far more alarmed about the scope and depth of militant Islam. Novelist Salman Rushdie, on whom the late Ayatollah Khomeini once issued a death order, wrote in The New York Times:

If this isn't about Islam, why the worldwide Muslim demonstrations in support of Osama bin Laden and Al Qaeda? Why did those 10,000 men armed with swords and axes mass on the Pakistan-Afghanistan frontier, answering some mullah's call to jihad? Why are the war's first British casualties three Muslim men who died fighting on the Taliban side? . …[Islamists have] a loathing of modern society in general, riddled as it is with music, godlessness, and sex; and a more particularized loathing (and fear) of the prospect that their own immediate surroundings could be taken over—"Westoxicated"—by the liberal Western-style way of life.
Poverty is their great helper, and the fruit of their efforts is paranoia. This paranoid Islam, which blames outsiders, "infidels," for all the ills of Muslim societies, and whose proposed remedy is the closing of those societies to the rival project of modernity, is presently the fastest growing version of Islam in the world.
Others have been naming Islam's dark side as well, without suggesting that all Muslims are terrorists. Thomas Friedman, author of From Beirut to Jerusalem, has taunted Osama bin Laden in his New York Times columns, while also warning of the terrorist's popularity in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and other Muslim nations.

British journalist Julie Burchill wrote a scathing article in The Guardian against the "sustained effort on the part of the British media to present Islam—even after the Rushdie affair and now during the Taliban's reign of terror—as something essentially 'joyous' and 'vibrant,' sort of like Afro-Caribbean culture, only with fasting and fatwas."

Melanie Phillips, writing in The Times of London, raises the possibility of treason among British Muslims. "As if the progress of the Afghan war wasn't enough to worry about, a nightmare specter is emerging at home. The attitude of many British Muslims should cause the greatest possible alarm that we have a fifth column in our midst . …Thousands of alienated young Muslims, most of them born and bred here but who regard themselves as an army within, are waiting for an opportunity to help to destroy the society that sustains them. We now stare into the abyss, aghast."

In the weeks after the World Trade Center crumbled, there was no proof of an Islamic world totally united against terrorism. Rick Bragg reported in The New York Times about Muslim boys running through their school compounds in Pakistan on September 11. They were "celebrating, stabbing the fingers on one hand into the palm of the other, to simulate a plane stabbing into a building." Palestinian authorities went into overdrive to suppress images of youths celebrating the deaths in America.

September 11 as Islam
There is, finally, the view that September 11 represents authentic Islam, a notion adopted by Osama bin Laden and his many followers. His revolutionary zeal lacks no clarity. "The ruling to kill the Americans and their allies—civilians and military—is an individual duty for every Muslim who can do it in any country in which it is possible to do it," he said in February 1998. Muslim extremists from Bangladesh, Egypt, and Pakistan also signed this fatwa, titled "Urging Jihad Against Americans." Bin Laden told ABC News producer Rahimullah Yousafsai last winter that he would kill his own children, if it were necessary, to hit American targets.

Ironically, some Christian writers have also advanced the view that September 11 represents true Islam. Of these, the most influential is Robert A. Morey, the popular evangelical cult-watcher, who in recent years has targeted Islam as a deadly religion. Author of The Islamic Invasion, Morey has often debated leading Muslim apologists, in fiery exchanges that have led to mob attacks on him and repeated calls for his death. Morey has accused Muhammad of being a racist, a murderer, an irrational zealot, and a pedophile. After September 11, Morey announced a spiritual crusade against Islam, and invited Christians to sign this pledge:

In response to the Muslim Holy War now being waged against us, We, the undersigned, following the example of the Christian Church since the 7th century, do commit ourselves, our wealth, and our families to join in a Holy Crusade to fight against Islam and its false god, false prophet, and false book. We, the undersigned, believe that Islam is the root of all Muslim terrorism, which is the fruit of Islam.
Christian scholars have criticized Morey for his invective, but he remains unmoved. He has argued that Muslims will start World War III. On his Web site, Morey invites Christians to fill in a "certificate of valor" that reads, "I wish to join in the Crusade of Christ against Islam. To that end, and to demonstrate in the crusade against Islam, I hereby donate toward emergency wartime funds."

The Rise of the Militants
Sorting through these three interpretations demands analysis of some deeper issues. First, we must come to grips with the vast unrest in the Islamic world, both now and over the last two centuries. There has been a growing radicalization in Islam since the early 1800s, both in response to the spread of Western colonialism and the demise of Muslim political supremacy.

Osama bin Laden traces his radicalism to the Wahhabism of his native Saudi Arabia, a movement that began with the reformer Muhammad ibn 'Abd al-Wahhab (1703–87), an advocate of a puritanical reading of Islamic law and belief. The Wahhabis threatened the interests of the Ottoman Turks and, in concert with the Saud dynasty, eventually gained control of Mecca and Medina, Islam's holiest cities.

A fundamentalist thrust in Islam emerged in Egypt as well, with the formation of the Muslim Brotherhood (also known as Al-Ikhwan al-Muslimun) in 1927. Tormented first by the presence of British rule and then by a tepid Muslim government, brotherhood founder Hassan al-Banna and Sayyid Qutb, his chief intellectual heir, sought by any means, including violence, to restore true Islamic rule to Egypt.

The brotherhood started branches in Jordan and Syria, and militant groups in India, Iran, and Iraq imitated its radicalism. Muhammad Nawab-Safavi started his Fedayeen-e-Islami movement in Iran in the 1930s and told his followers: "Throw away your beads and get a gun: for beads keep you silent whilst guns silence the enemies of Islam." Abul A'la Maududi organized his militant Jamaat-e-Islami in the Punjab in 1941. After the creation of Pakistan in 1947, Maududi tried repeatedly to convince the government to adopt his stricter version of Islamic rule.

Western awareness of militant Islam came with the radical overthrow of the Shah of Iran in 1979 and the establishment of harsh Shari'ah law under the Ayatollah Khomeini. American exposure to Islamic fundamentalism came with the arrest of Americans in Tehran, the bombing of the World Trade Center in 1993, the explosions at U.S. embassies in Africa, the attack on the USS Cole in Yemen, and then the horrors of September 11.

Interpreting Jihad
Every discussion of Islamic militancy turns eventually to two fundamental concerns. First, how much is Islamism (that practiced by fundamentalist Muslims open to violence) rooted in the teaching and practice of the prophet Muhammad? Would he celebrate the work of Osama bin Laden? Second, are the violent jihads of our day sanctioned by the Qur'an and by the actions of early Muslim leaders?

The prophet himself engaged in many military battles and could be merciless to his enemies, even those who simply attacked him verbally. His original sympathies with Jews and Christians as "Peoples of the Book" gave way to a harsher treatment when they did not follow Islam. In one infamous episode, Muhammad cut the heads off hundreds of Jewish males of the Beni Quraiza tribe who did not side with him in battle. The prophet is quoted as saying, "The sword is the key of heaven and hell; a drop of blood shed in the cause of Allah, a night spent in arms, is of more avail than two months of fasting or prayer: whosoever falls in battle, his sins are forgiven, and at the day of judgment his limbs shall be supplied by the wings of angels and cherubim."

In reference to the Qur'an, many have drawn attention to the famous passage in Surah 2:256: "Let there be no compulsion in religion." This verse fits well with other Qur'an verses in which jihad means personal and communal spiritual struggle or striving. But the Qur'an also uses jihad to mean "holy war," and the language can be extreme. Surah 5:33 reads, "The punishment of those who wage war against God and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter."

Both the example of the prophet and some emphases in the Qur'an provided warrant for Islam's earliest leaders to spread Islam by military conquest. Bloody expansionism was also justified through original Islamic law that divided the world into two realms: Dar al-Harb (the land of war) and Dar al-Islam (land under Islamic rule). Both Paul Fregosi's Jihad in the West and Jewish scholar Bat Ye'or's Decline of Eastern Christianity Under Islam document the reality of Muslim crusades long before the notorious Christian crusades of the Middle Ages.

Out of the vortex of these realities emerge two different perspectives among modern Muslims. Islamists consider their actions a true jihad or "holy war" against infidels and the enemies of Islam. They believe it is right to target America, "the great Satan." Osama bin Laden believes that the Qur'an supports his campaign, that the prophet would bless his cause, and that Allah is on his side. But the vast majority of Muslims believe that nothing in Muhammad's life or in the Qur'an or Islamic law justifies terrorism.

Bernard Lewis, the great historian of Islam, noted in Th