Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083760

Who's Online

We have 576 guests online



Why Can Brazil Play with Nukes While Iran Can't? PDF Print E-mail
2005 - March 2005
Written by Sarah Schaffer   
Thursday, 17 March 2005 19:46

Iran's Nuclear ProgramWashington, intent on wooing Brasília, is prepared to look the other way on the nuclear front. Brazil, with a history of covert nuclear experimentation and construction, has refused IAEA total inspection of its Resende Plant nuclear centrifuge.

Washington adamantly denies that Brasília has plans to join the nuclear club - perhaps due to Brazil's peacemaking efforts in Haiti.

The Bush administration has offered Iran economic incentives to abandon nuclear technology and development, (a right that Iran legally has under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty), threatening that a failure to accept this arrangement will result in sanctions by the UN Security Council.

In recent weeks, Washington has stepped up its aggressive stance toward Iran, threatening it with harsh UN Security Council-mandated sanctions if it does not abandon its alleged nuclear activities.

But last Friday, President Bush offered to drop U.S. objections to Iranian membership in the World Trade Organization (WTO) in exchange for a freeze on Tehran's nuclear energy program. Iran continues to defend its right to pursue nuclear technology under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

U.S. officials have been claiming that Iran's civilian program is merely a cover to develop nuclear weapons, but Tehran has denied the accusation, saying that its efforts are solely aimed at generating atomic energy.

Ironically, despite the Bush administration's bellicose demands that Iran give up its uranium enrichment program, Washington has dismissed any cause for alarm over a somewhat similar nuclear program in Brazil.

Washington's willingness to suspend disbelief over the more arcane aspects of Brazil's uranium enrichment perhaps can be attributed to Brasília's present peacemaking efforts in Haiti - which has been a godsend for the U.S. - and the Bush administration's eagerness to achieve closer relations with the Latin-American powerhouse.

A Questionable History

Throughout the 1980s, Brazil remained on the UN's watch list for its covert dealings with West Germany to acquire nuclear technology; meanwhile, it increased its conventional weapons trade with "rogue" nations and evaded international nuclear processing inspections.

Brasília's allegedly questionable activities have continued since President Luiz Inácio "Lula" da Silva refused to allow a comprehensive inspection of his nation's nuclear facilities last fall.

He recently finalized the $170 million sale of 24 Super Tucano training and light combat aircraft to Washington's Latin American nemesis, Venezuelan President Hugo Chávez.

Ordinarily Washington would not hesitate to express its strong rancor over such a move, but this proved not to be the case in this instance.

In October 2004, after several months of evasive negotiations, Brazilian officials finally allowed the IAEA to inspect all of its nuclear facilities, except the Resende Plant's centrifuge.

According to Brazil's Ministry of Science and Technology, the Resende facility enriches uranium that fuels the nation's two nuclear power plants, which together provide only 4.3 percent of the nation's total electricity.

Due to the fact that Brazil is not heavily endowed with oil and natural reserves, its quest for nuclear energy is understandable. But Brazil's experience with its persistently troubled first nuclear plant, Angra I, has witnessed frequent failures resulting in a number of power outages.

Despite the questionable function of Brazil's Resende centrifuge, the IAEA agreed to President Lula's terms to allow inspectors to examine the pipes leading into and out of the centrifuge, but not the facility itself, ostensibly for proprietary reasons.

The IAEA's refusal to release its findings also has intensified some observers' suspicions. While the IAEA was expected to announce its conclusions by the end of November 2004, such a report has yet to be made public.

Mark Gwozdecky, director of public information for the IAEA, told COHA, "there has been no announcement about Brazil...[but the IAEA and Brazilian officials] have agreed on an arrangement for verifying that the Resende plant is devoted exclusively to peaceful purposes."

A Faulty NPT

Although reluctantly cooperative with IAEA inspectors, Brazil remains in full compliance with the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT), which it ratified in 1998.

While the treaty prohibits any country outside the five acknowledged nuclear states (the U.S., the Russian Federation, the United Kingdom, France and China) from acquiring or producing nuclear weapons, according to IAEA Director-General Muhammad ElBaradei in a February 2 op-ed published in the Financial Times, "Any country can have full control over enrichment [and] reprocessing activities."

Yet he deems that production of highly enriched uranium and reprocessed plutonium, which are used to make nuclear weapons as well as for nonmilitary purposes and are possessed by Brazil, as "just too close for comfort."

Under the latitude provided by the NPT, Brazil's denial of a thorough inspection of all nuclear sites may be reason enough to suspect that it was interested in developing nuclear weapons technology, but the Bush Administration does not seem particularly worried as of now.

After a fall 2004 visit, former Secretary of State Colin Powell stated that, "the United States has absolutely no concerns about Brazil doing anything with its nuclear program except developing power in a most controlled, responsible manner."

He confidently stifled critics' concerns of nuclear weapons development, maintaining, "We know for sure that Brazil is not thinking about nuclear weapons in any sense."

Although Powell's determination that Lula is not manufacturing nuclear weapons components as of now is most likely correct, Henry Sokolski, director of the Non-Proliferation Policy Education Center, a Washington-based non-profit organization, told COHA that we can "expect Brazil to share its enrichment technology with nations that do harbor nuclear weapons aspirations."

The Brazilian military, in turn, will have to "reassess the need for nuclear weapons if other nations do go nuclear." Given the availability of uranium, skilled personnel and enrichment technology, the country is a prime candidate to process and ultimately possess nuclear devices, if it is so intentioned.

How, then, has such a potential danger avoided the intense scrutiny it deserves and most likely would have normally gotten from the international non-proliferation community and certainly by the U.S.?

Coddling Hemispheric Relations

In reality, there seems to be little cause to worry that Brazil has covert plans to join the nuclear club. Lula's priority is more likely for Brazil to aspire to become the Latin American hegemon as well as attain a permanent seat on the UN Security Council.

While the recent arms sale to Venezuela has probably hurt Lula's otherwise beatific status with Washington, he did not mean to compromise his entente with the U.S., which he most recently earned by agreeing to have the Brazilian military lead the UN peacekeeping mission to Haiti.

Lula's commitment rescued the U.S. from having its embarrassingly contradictory policy of ignoring the legitimacy of then-President Jean-Bertrand Aristide and ousting him by a de facto coup on February 29, 2004.

The U.S. decision to overlook Brazil's nuclear potential while strictly scrutinizing Iran's nuclear efforts further exemplifies Washington's inconsistent foreign policy - particularly its capacity for selective indignation.

In his campaign to make Brazil a more formidable regional player - with its nuclear efforts serving as a viable tool - Lula will try to demonstrate, among other things, that his country is capable of economic growth independent of Washington's predilections for the region.

For its part, Brazil will continue to forge trade agreements, such as the recent arms sale to Venezuela, regardless of Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's portrayal of President Hugo Chávez as a negative factor in the hemisphere.

For now however, it seems the Bush Administration is willing to forgive and forget as it plays along with Lula's agenda in the name of trying to service an important Latin American relationship.

This analysis was prepared by Sarah Schaffer, COHA Research Associate. Additional research provided by Claudia Patterson, COHA Research Associate.

The Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA) - www.coha.org - is a think tank established in 1975 to discuss and promote inter-American relationship. Email: coha@coha.org.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (41)Add Comment
...
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
You are on crack.

If Brazil wanted nuclear weapons we could have them in a few months. Brazil pursued nuclear weapons during the (American backed) dictatorship. Nuclear Weapons would hurt Brazil's diplomacy, not help it. AND if we wanted nuclear weapons (which we dont) what business is it of anybodys? Brazil has been a pacifistic country for decades that enjoys great relations with just about everyone.
What a Crock
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
I'm an American and I agree with the above comment. Everyone needs to remember that this "COHA" is based in Europe and seems intent on making relations between North and South America worse. Brazil is a totally different situation than Iran or North Korea. It is a historically peaceful country, with peaceful intentions, while Iran has a formal stated policy of desiring to destroy Israel. North Korea is ruled by a nut.COHA should mention all the facts if they are not just writing mindless propaganda. Leave Brazil alone.
Ditto to the above
written by Guest, March 18, 2005

I am also an American, and I think that if any country could handle the responsibility that comes with the addition of nuclear arms to its national aresnal it would be Brazil.

Brazil is the undisputed "big dog" on the block in South America and is a country uniquely and culturally situated to keep the peace, advance prosperity, and incent democracy over the long term south of the equator.

God speed to Brazil

Typical American Hypocracy!
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
They have it (including Israel)...but nobody else is allowed to develop it....double standard. Beyond that, is there an american theme as to world domination?

Brasil not ready
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
I do not believe Brasil is ready to handle the responsibilities of owning nuclear devices and I do believe nuclear devices are the business of everyone. For this, it is best to continue to limit Brasil's desire towards nuclear power as well as every other country's (USA included!). If Angra I has proved to be a failure, imagine a robust nuclear program with inadequate security and sub ject to Latin America politics! No thanks, the world is bad enough already...
You (above) are not ready...
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
Thank God, your inconsequential opinion does not count!

The title of the article should be...
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
Why can Israel, the United States, France and a few other rich and hegemonic countries not only keep their nuclear weapons, but keep developing them to the point of nowadays being able to actually change the shape of the planet know as Earth and not even have to do that in disguise, while any other country who tries to develop nuclear technology, even if it is just for producing electricity is bullied to death?
...
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
Give everybody nuclear technology and the ability to produce weapons grade plutonium! That way no one will be the scapegoat and everyone will live in harmony. There will be no excuses and everyone will be asked to be responsible. That should work.
Angra 1
written by Guest, March 18, 2005

As an American, I am proud of the space/rocket program, but the American rocket/space program was not an absolute success from the get go ? Just watch the movie "The right stuff."

And, the world was really safe when the US was "ready" for its nuclear responsibility in the 50s and early 60s with the rabid McCarthyism, Goldwater and John Birch proclamations of "better dead than red", with little kids practicing duck under the desk nuclear attack drills. Get Real !!

The point is that Brazil is the most vibrant democracy in South America, with an overall population that is patient, forebearing, and optomistic - and those are the traits that lend themselves to being indicative of handling responsibility.
why?
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
To the author
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
In order to produce nuclear weapons out of Uranium, it must reach a high level of enrichment, which can be done in any Uranium enrichment facility, such as the one in Resende, Brasil. However, if the intention is merely to produce electricity, a low level of enrichment (less than 10% - which is the limit allowed by the IAEA ) is plenty.
What happened in Brazil is that the brazilian government allowed the IAEA to inspect every single gram of enriched Uranium that cames in and out of Resende, so that the level of enrichment below 10% can be verified, without, however, allowing inspector to enter the facility. Allegedly, this is to protect brazilian technology.
Now, if one knows just a little bit about Chemistry - and the IAEA do - it becomes clear that it is IMPOSSIBLE to develop nuclear weapons without highly enriched Uranium. And this is precisely why both IAEA and Washington have dropped the subject and only uninformed and irresponsible article writers such as yourself are the ones still make noise about it. ;-)
because
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
because we are big and the iran is smaller,because we are large with 27 states like countrys in territori because we have 180.000.000 people we are 50 percents of south america and we are a peacefull people .we ever try to find a peaceful solution to our neighbors questions like venezuela and colombia is the example and the bolivian question at this time.In the south america are two tipes of colonization spanish empire and portuguese empire this is like brazilian empire,because portugal is in the europe,at the centurys brazil have the oportuniti to separate in too many countries but not do this we not have extremists int hte brazil, not about futbol teams,cause im fanatic for my team gremio footbal porto alegrense.the iran is one country to the ocidental people is distant,diferent,is with a lot of fanatics,terrorists,bombmans,taths is the cnn and american propaganda,in the brazil we think live and let to live, one example my boss is a ma,con, their wife is a catholic,theis son is of the universal church i-m a catholic and we work togheter and we dont fight,but at the world championship we see the games togheter on the world cup wen the selections is on gmae the countrie stops,it is the diference,we can organise our societi in the real fhings , on the rationment of energy in the past in the national questions we are united. an not have extremists on brazil.on the rio de janeiro and sao paulo the crime situation never wil be on fact in discontroler cause in the backside ever have the state of brazil we never will loose control of our federation like certain parts of countris at the mid west.
and int the reality if we have need to do nuke bombs we can do too fast .but only in need to defense ,try to remember do you know one country enemy of brazil?do you read something about this?we are the best countrie to speak about peace,if the iranians like to live under the control of the aiatolah we dont have trouble with this because the freedom is a one sate of mind we think we are catholic occindetall other kind of civilization we dont want to destroy the others we live an let to live .if they massively get arms and figth for their freedom we will recognise their victori and they will conquer teir real freedom by the blood and the sword like others ocindental societys around the world and because this we get te real value of our freedom,cause was made by us and not as gifth by a stranger.i think the writer not read about history geopolitical and other lectures if she do she wil know the diference in aiatolahs speachs ,and footbal beer and womens on bikini at the beach.
To the author 2
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
Standing Ovation....
From an American
written by Guest, March 18, 2005
To the author of "because"- Very Well Said!
gringo imperialism is evil
written by Guest, March 19, 2005
gringo imperialism is evil
Dt
written by Guest, March 19, 2005
I probably have the minority opinion on this topic but I tend to think that Brazil should probably develop nuclear weapons to end this stupid international speculation if the country is going to produce it or not. Not that I think it will ever need to use the bomb but because I am a realist and I think liberals are wrong about politics, esepcially the neoliberals. Nuclear bombs provide the necessary deterance to defend a countries soverignity. But just look around the globe, France got nuclear weapons in 1995. UK has had them. Most of the great powers have them. China has them now. India and Pakistan do to! India, Russia, China all have them and they are talked about in the media as potential superpowers in the future. Brazil, because of its size and sheer economic power belongs to that league of elite developing countries. So to fully join the club and start playing the true realist game of politics! Now if Angra I did not go so well, maybe they can develop nuclear technology if they invest more money in these damn programs.
My father actually worked for Brazil's nuclear program during the military regime, and I am positive they could have the bomb in a few months. The difference between Iran and Brazil are many. Brazil does not support Hizboallah, or any other groups that want the destruction of the state of Israel or the USA. At least it is not our official government policy. Plus, no one else in this hemisphere has them, except the USA, we need to create multipolarity in the world in order to maintain the balance of power!
My opinion
written by Guest, March 19, 2005
We don't need to have nuclear weapons.. Brazil did a huge move, let me explain it: The next few years Brazil will enrich uranion rods to 5% to fuel nuclear plants and to sell abroad to fuel others..fine..But after the first year Brazil will have some good stock of those rods. Let's imagine some country decide to mess with Brazil, a country with a bigger and better army or with/not bomb..anyway, so Brazil decide to build his bomb..now is the check mate, Brazil has missels, and remember those stocks..now is easy to bring those rods to a fulll 100% to make a bomb. Touche! What a country, see we do not need to have nuclear arms..but who said we can't not develop a nuclear program? now there's other facts on it, Brazil and Argentina sign not to develop nuclear arms, so we need to respect the harmony in South America. Even if there was any crazy country to threat us, before that all the Americans countries would step up for us, same we would do, remember 9/11? Brazil was the first country to call for the security of the continent, thinking the USA was under a foreign atack! So we do not need it...and now why some countries are so danger to have nuclears weapons, even those who already have it! if you are a American you will remember 1964, when Russia decide to put some missels on Cuba, Ok, so Russia was trying to piss off USA, and did very well...But what a crazy move, I mean...Even the missels in Cuba were under Russian soldiers and officials control..come on, they were in surronded by a huge Cuban army. Fidel wanted to go to war, to die for it! he told the Russians that! scary guy. But my point is, so many countries persuing nuclear arms, and those countries always have some allie friend in need..if History always repety itself sometimes..and is because we are crazy, the Iran may put some nuclear weapons in other country and these country lider fidel copy may really pull the trigger...So Brazil is in this too, has all the responsability in keep it program in check....and that is all Brazilian responsibilities, if we want to grow a great country we need to make the rigths moves...
...
written by Guest, March 20, 2005
Well, let's talk about this topic again when the Comando Vermelho or one of the other powerful criminal organizations got their hands on nuclear material and either use it themselves for gang wars or sell (rather unlikely) it to some foreign terrorists (pretty likely). The problem is not what the Brazilian government would do with nuclear weapons, but that it can not guarantee the necessary security standards.
Interesting!
written by Guest, March 20, 2005
I find the entire situation to be interesting. Lula (the current prez) is a NUT!! He's assisting in the destruction of relations with all civilized nations and countries. His friends are Fidel Castro and Hugo Chavez, just to name a few of the (Communists). I'm afraid that the Brazilian people are duped (fooled) by the rhetoric they hear and see in their own news media outlets. They have been (Trained) to hate George W Bush, for unfounded reasons. They don't understand the US, but cry for her HELP!! whenever the need arises. They denounce all US efforts to keep the Western World free of out of control, flying bombs (in the form of commercial aircraft). Hello!! Brazil arrested an American Airlines Pilot and crew for giving their security the "Finger" last year. SO WHAT! Actually, the didn't care about the finger... they just wanted the $13,000 US Dollars they extorted (36,000 Real) for the incident! You see, in my opinion- Brazil is a wonderful country, with a horrible government. Wonderful people, fooled by the propaganda of the LULA machine! I'm not worried about the Brazilian people having Nukes- since they're mainly peaceful- God fearing people. I'm worried about the fanatical, Socialist/Communist government having devices that could harm humanity, especially in the Americas if they want to make a few quick bucks! Lula is notorious for selling out his own people, why would he hesitate to grab some money from IRAN, or our old buddies Bin Laden or Zarkowi if they could scrape up $20 million dollars for a nuke device to TEST in a large Western City??? Hey, wake up Brazilians!!! You're not immuned from Terrorism! It doesn't take too many airplanes flying into skyscrapers before your entire economy is reduced to a "Favela"!

Signed- Your loving Gringo Friend in SC, USA!
To the loving Gringo
written by Guest, March 20, 2005
What's that written on the back of your mind "duck under the desk, the commies are comming". I'm really sorry you had to go through such routines in your childhood. Why are Americans so scared of communism, other than sheer propaganda? Do they relate communism to Rome "all roads leads to communism"? Or is it they're so sick and tired of the world's current state, but can see no light in the end of the tunnel. There is only one problem with communism, humans, and the only pro to capitalism is the use of the human factor. "Lula is a communism" hell, then he must be Jesus 2.0, I can't believe after so many years he stilll believes in the human spirit, that is just not possible. "He's a communist" is starting to sounds like "who is John Galt?", wtf do you mean by it? He's a dreamer, he's a nut who believes in humans, he's a dictator, a rebel without a cause, self destructive person, better yet, what are you? Do you not try to make the world in your own image? Aren't utopias like Star Trek's Federation communist? Do you even understand the problem involved here?
unbelievable
written by Guest, March 21, 2005

It's unbelievable that some people actually believe that Lula is a commy!

Do these people even understand what communism is???
I would LOVE to read their definition of communism... it must be V-E-R-Y INNOVATIVE!!!

Evaluate some facts:

->The man has been running the country for almost 4 years now and all he has been doing is favour the rich eleet and the wealthy bankers (just like president Bush in the U.S.).

->The state is not interveining in the economy,

->The poor have been left aside.

-> FMI, World Bank and other institutions are very satisfyed with the full implementation of the neo-liberal ideology started by former president FHC and carried ob by Lula and his ministers.

Helloooooooooooooo????
Do you have eyes???
Is there a head above your neck???

WHO HAS BEEN "TRAINED" TO HATE WHAT?'
Cold War \"widows\"
written by Guest, March 21, 2005
Amazes me the huge amount of americans who are still living in the Could War (Capitalism X Communism).
Wake up, guys! It ended twenty-five years ago!
Catching up with History would be nice...
COLD WAR IS A REALITY IN BRAZIL
written by Guest, March 21, 2005
The ideology of Marxism is more alive than ever in Brazil. Who says the opposite is either an ignorant or a deceiver.

Lula’s government does not solve the problem of misery in Brazil because socialism has never been capable to do so. The only thing socialism does is to distribute misery and efficiently kill people who disagrees from the government..

Lula’s best friends are Hugo Chavez and Fidel Castro. His leading political advisor is Marco A. Garcia, who recently wrote an academic article about the necessity of re-constituting communism in the world: “If the horizon that we search for is still called communism, it is time to re-constitute it”.

Under his inspiration, Lula declared at the 2003 Socialist International that his main objective was to “re-establish the socialist dream”. In partnership with Fidel Castro, Lula and other PT members have organized the Forum of São Paulo (FSP). Since 1990, this Forum has convened many terrorist organizations from Latin America, Europe, and Middle East. In 2004, organizers of the Forum of São Paulo described the conference as an attempt at “offsetting our losses in Eastern Europe with (sic) our victories in Latin America”.

Joining Lula at the 2003 conference were Fidel Castro, Nicaragua’s former dictator Daniel Ortega, Colombia’s chief of the FARC drug guerrillas, members of Chile’s MIR and Peru’s Tupac Amaru, members of Spain’s ETA and Ireland’s IRA, members of Saddam Hussein’s Baathist Socialist Party, as well as delegates from Libya and Middle Eastern terrorist organizations.

Before the war in Iraq, in 2004, federal deputies of the Workers’ Party went to Iraq to manifest their solidarity towards Saddam Hussein’s tyrannical regime. Also in 2003, the Lula government supported the execution of political dissidents by the Cuban communist regime. The official note states that Cuban dissidents deserve to be assassinated because they ‘destabilize’ the communist regime. The ambassador to Cuba defended the killings of dissidents in these terms: “Likewise, if they try to destabilize Lula, we will also have to take measures here”.

President Lula believes in a ‘planetary class struggle’ between rich and poor countires. In his 2003 visit to Egypt, he told the Egyptians that poor countries should adopt a ‘more aggressive’ instance against the United States. He also announced in Egypt that the Brazilian government wishes to develop stronger ties of relationship with the Islamic world, because nobody “nobody wants the American Empire to survive”.

In his visit to Lybia, in December 2003, Lula declared to much appreciate the ‘good advises’ given by his friends Gadhafi and Arafat. Gathered around the same table, President Lula was with dictator Gadhafi, Sandinista leader Daniel Ortega, and Algerian leader Ben Balla. Prompted to clarify the reason for his participation, Lula answered that he does not abandon his ‘friends’.

In 2003, an opinion poll conduced by highly respect IBOPE showed that the U.S. President had lower levels of approval rating than Saddam Hussein. Also, a city council and member of the Communist Party of Brazil (PC do B), a party which governs the country in coalition with the Lula’s Workers’ Party, has passed a municipal law which declares President Bush persona non grata in Rio de Janeiro.

In conclusion, since President Lula took office, in 2003, Brazil has: a) not complied with the U.N. Nuclear Proliferation Treaty; b) offered political exile to Saddam Husseim; c) refused Colombia’s request to regard the FARC as terrorist group; d) given oil to Venezuela’s Hugo Chavez during a strike for democracy and human rights; e) declared ‘strategic partnership’ with communist China; f) abstained from condemning the execution of Cuban dissidents at the UN Human Rights Committee; g) supported a cocaine growers’ leader, Evo Morales, to oust an elected President in Bolivia. (In interview to La Nación – Argentina's major newspaper – Morales called for the transformation of Latin America into a new Vietnam for the United States) ; h) proposed external control over the Brazilian judiciary; i) proposed external body of control over the press; j) proposed the state control over Brazil’s artistic, cinematographic and audiovisual production.
to the cold war
written by Guest, March 21, 2005
im very impressioned with all of your words about my president and off course your alphabetical list.i hope you tell me your countrybecause im a brazilian and like the massive opinion of my people this movments of president lula is very good to change te power in the world and i hope he could do everithing they want tyo do,because the peoples around the world is like cubans they prefer a isolament dificults even the die of people at given their freedomm to united states,o yes we oferr asilum to saddam but united sattes put saddam in power,the farc is not a terrorist is a popular movment we dont have terrorist in the south america we aterrorized with the powerfull of us army airforce and navy in a world scale, for us it is a very big trouble, and dont think i am antiamerican why you dont think why too many peoples hate united sates?because your too much strong at no have nobody to opose your force.the oil to VENEZUELA was a strategic decisionthe Brazil and venezuela are neighbors and our FRIEND HUGO CHAVES FRIAS is stryked by the empire or do you think we dont have need the venezuelas petroleum? DONT BE A CHILD.about ivo morales in brazil i cant speak,i wana kill lula,and nothing hapens to me it is a press freedom ,but if the united states go to south america with his army all of we wama transformer latin america into a new big big big vietnam, if brazil turn comunist wana by the people and the others not have nothing with this.
the declaration ,BECAUSE NOBODY WANTS THE AMERICAN EMPIRE TO SURVIVE, its true ,only the americans dont see this.wath you expect he says in one meet with arab coutnies?hes a sidicalist with experience in unit peoples against exploration and because this he a dangerous man to american empire.brazil wil turns latin america to the left ,brazil,venezuela,uruguay,ecuador,and folowing the others in the next elections ,about the forum of sao paulo i think the freedom is give of all the chance to speak a expose the motives of theyr fight or you divide world in with me,or,not with me?and the other side?the cold war was iniciated by powerfull countries by the years we see ear and decide wath we need for us,and i sorry but the united sattes and their freedom is not for us it is a begining of a new century and wee see guantanamo,afganistan,iraq,iran,vietnam,corea,el salvador,haiti, and i don want this from my sons,because i see on journals books tv and all of peoples around the world see too ,after the fall of urss, the empire need other enemy terrorists, fanatics assasins .wath country they atack? why? answer me and i will continue this letter.
Turning Latin America to the Left
written by Guest, March 21, 2005
Splendid idea. Leftism has been so great for Latin America. Cuba is growing by leaps and bounds. Nicaragua is the Holland of Central America. Venezuela, in spite of its oil wealth, is going down the s**tter. Brazil is still Brazil; is there still talk down there about the sleeping giant waking up. We've heard it all before. Leftism = eternal backwardness. Good luck y'all.
...
written by Guest, March 22, 2005
Let's just let the giant sleep, let the animals wipe each other out while the giant sleeps. What Brazil really needs is to educate its youth, I don't see progress in capitalistic mayhem, despite what you may argue. You live your American dream, and we will live our eternal sleep, let's hope we learn anything while we dream(more like nightmares). This is sounding like Marx, well, are we willing to pilage the planet for wall street or bovespa glory? How long will this glory last without education, surely Americans noticed prosperity doesn't improve education...
Brasil v Iran
written by Guest, March 22, 2005
What a load of crock. Comparing Brasil to Iran. Iran has as its No.1 intention to bring down the west what better way than with nuclear weapons. Brasil even if they had such weapons, I doubt very much if they would intend to bring down the west, for what reason align themselves with Iran. A fundamentalist Islamic regime and we all know if you are anything but Muslim you are marked for death. This is why Russia providing the material for Irans nuclear program is laughable, they would probably be the first to be hit by these extremists in their battles with Chechnya and other former republics who are battling Islamic fundamentalist forces. Also Chinas backing of Pakistan, Iran, Afghanistan etc. is a joke . These coutries would'nt think twice about killing every single buddhist, atheist non muslim in any of these countries. Of course these countries just do it out of profitability and to oppose any US concerns. The last laugh might just be on them though.
Long live Brasil

PS I am A Brit, living in Canada and hoping to live in Brasil soon.
Cyinical
written by Guest, March 22, 2005
Saying that Cuba's lack of economical growth is proof of Leftism failuire is the most cynical argument in the history of cynical arguments.
HELLOOO? They have been undergoing the American Empire's continental block for the past few DECADES!!!?
Ricardo C. Amaral
written by Guest, March 23, 2005

I wrote various articles regarding Brazil and nuclear weapons and you can read them at the following websites:

Brazzil - June 2003
Brazil, North Korea and Food for Nukes
http://www.brazzil.com/p104jun03.htm


Brazzil - February 2003
We Need the Bomb – Part ll
http://www.brazzil.com/p125feb03.htm


Brazzil - May 2002
Why Brazil Must Have the A-Bomb
http://www.brazzil.com/p24may02.htm

Ricardo C. Amaral
written by Guest, March 23, 2005


I wrote various articles regarding Brazil, North Korea and nuclear weapons, but they have been moved to another location inside Brazzil magazine. These article also were published at that time by a Brazilian newspaper in New York City - “The Brasilians.”


Today, you can find the original articles all in one location at:

http://northkorea-nuclearweapons.blogspot.com


Articles:

3) Brazzil - June 2003 - “Brazil, North Korea and Food for Nukes”


2) Brazzil - February 2003 - “We Need the Bomb – Part ll”


1) Brazzil - May 2002 – “Why Brazil Must Have the A-Bomb”


PS: If you find the original articles inside Brazzil magazine, my email address is incomplete. You can send email regarding these articles to: brazilamaral@yahoo.com
.
Jornal nacional
written by Guest, March 23, 2005
Breaking news:
Brazil discover the world most powerfull bomb! From now on any country that mtry or mess with us will suffer! The main source from this bomb comes from Brazzil.com, the bomb is made of some annoying brazilian, they are put inside a airplane and drop on the enemy country..the population will be drive crazy or will jump into the see and swin away far as possible by these brazilians so much BS...
...
written by Guest, March 24, 2005
Ha Ha Ha

:-|
...
written by Guest, March 24, 2005
If Marxism, be it in the internal level, be it in the international level (the G-20 and the mobilization of poor countries in one united block) is so flawed, why is it that it brings such fear and despair to the speeches of the rich and powerful?
NO SENCE
written by Guest, March 26, 2005
AS A VERY PROUD BRAZILIAN CITIZEN I WOULD LIKE TO SHARE MY IDEAS ABOUT ALL THIS s**t GOING ON ABOUT WAR NUCLEAR WEAPONS AND EVERYTHING FIRST OF ALL I THINK THAT THIS THING OF WAR IS A PROOF THAT OUR SOCIET (humans ) ARE NOT EVOLUETED ENOUGH TO BE CALLED A INTELIGENT SOCIET WE MAY BE A CREATIVE AN VISIONERY BUT NOT INTELIGENTS I TELL YOU WHY WE LIVE IN A GIANT BALL THAT IF WE SCAPE FROM WE WILL NEED TO TRAVEL FOR BILLIONS OF YEARS TO MAYBE FIND SOME KIND OF ( INTELLIGENT CIVILIZATION) AND EVEN HAVING THIS KNOWLEGE WE RE KEEP GOING ON THIS s**t OF WAR FIRST OF ALL I KNOW THAT WAR IS ALLREADY PROGRAMED IN OUR MINDS (HUMAN MINDS ) BUT WITH THE INTENT TO DEFEND NOT TO DESTROY AND ATACK I DO NOT HAVE NOTHING AGAINST UNITED STATES BUT I THINK THEY ARE GOING A LITLLE TO FAR WITH THE IDEA OF TRANSFORME OUR WORLD IN A CAOS THEY ( GOVERNMENT ) SAY THAT THEY WANT TO FIGHT AGAINT TERRORIST (I AM SORRY AMERICAM PEOPLE I LOVE YOU ALL) BUT IF GEORGE BUSH WANT TO END WITH THE TERROR HE SHOLD START FOR HIMSELF I DO NOT HEAR ABOUT PEAPLE ATACKING U.S ( BESIDES THE HORRIBLE 9/11 ) BUT U.S ATACKING OR PLANNING TO IS FIRST PAGE IN ALL NEWS PAPER I THINK WAR GOD GAVE US THE IDEA OF WAR TO USE IT OFF COURSE, OTHERWISE WE WOULD NOT HAVE THIS PROGRAM IN OUR MINDS BUT TO USE TO THE GOOD OF THE WORLD NOT TO DESTROY IT OR TRY TO BE SOME KIND OF GLOBAL LEADER I ALSO THINK THAT A WAR WOULD BE UNDERSTANDABLE IF ONE DAY (MONKEYS ) OR ANOTHER SPECYES FOR SOME REASON BECOME INTELIGENTS ENOUGH TO TRY TO TAKE OVER THE EARTH THEM WE WOULD HAVE A REASON TO FIGHT ,BUT FIGHT AGAINST OUR OWN BROTHERS THATS A SHAME FOR OUR RACE IS THE SAME THAN TRY TO DESTROY THE GOD S CREATIONS THANKS
FERNANDOSILVA_221@HOTMAIL.COM
OIL BABY
written by Guest, April 01, 2005
I'm an Iranian living in Toronto and I just wanted to say OIL. Has anyone wondered that OIL may have something to do with this double standard? Iran has the second largest deposits of oil and natural gas in the world. Now this may sound like a good thing ($$$), but it has brought much suffering to its people. Western powers have meddled in this country, overthrowing a nationalist and democratically elected Prime Misinster in 1953. He was accused of being a communist. But in reality he was a liberal who nationalized Iran's oil company (Anglo-Iranian Oil or what is now known as British Petrolium) for the benefit of his people. Western powers installed and supported their dictator instead. Secondly, Iran is strategically located on the Persian Gulf and the Caspian Sea. Both areas are rich in oil and natural gas deposits. 30% of the world's daily oil supply passes through the strait of Hormuz in the Persian Gulf. The Caspian will supply much of Europe's oil in the near future via pipelines. Brazil is far away from this cursed region of the globe. These are are the only reasons behind Western propaganda and hostility towards Iran. It's because they don't control the regime in power. It's not about GOOD or BAD regime, but that they don't CONTROL it. America is getting scared because China also likes OIL. The Islamic Regime in reality is despised by the Iranian people and will not survive. By beating the war drums, America is only strengthening the regimes grip on the country and making it more difficult for the democratic forces and NGO's in Iran. And for those of you who think Iran will nuke Israel or the West, I think that is plain nonsense. It's just rhetoric and simply irrational. The mullas are not suicidal, they are like your typical capitalist businessmen stuffing their pockets while claiming to be pious muslims. Bush is equivalent to Mulla. Long live Brazil!
You\'re Damn Right
written by Guest, April 04, 2005
...
written by Guest, April 04, 2005
The rich countries stay rich by putting down the poor ones. The US pumps out more propaganda than the nazis ever did. The US put Saddam into power and than try to say now that they're freeing Iraq when they turned it into s**t. When I watch the news here in the US all i see is bulls**t from every news station because they are all controlled by the government. Everyone is a puppet and we don't know it. The US isn't rulled by the people or the senate and government wing. It's rulled by the richest people in the world who are so rich that money isn't an object. They're so rich their money is unlimited. Man, why can't people read between the lines. Wow I go off topic. Brazil doesn't need nuclear weaponds. No one needs them. They will cause a lot more harm than good. we should just get rid of all weaponds and make all things equal so we don't need to fight wars.
To the author
written by Guest, April 04, 2005
Go to hell you bastard!
...
written by Guest, April 13, 2005
kiss my ass
...
written by Guest, May 03, 2006
Who needs nukes when you have Rio?

Welcome Aboard
...
written by hesam, August 31, 2007
hi
can i know about carpet fair in brazil

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack