Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083744

Who's Online

We have 559 guests online



How the IMF Is Tying Down Brazil's Hands PDF Print E-mail
2005 - March 2005
Written by Daniel Torres   
Saturday, 26 March 2005 18:56

Brazilian former president Fernando Henrique CardosoLooking back in the economic history of any country is extremely difficult. But the economic era of the Cardoso administration must be analyzed in order to better understand the current economic conditions that plague Brazil today. 

In 1994, Cardoso, still as Finance Minister of President Itamar Franco, initiated a massive economic campaign designed to improve the state-controlled economy.

It began with a new currency called the Real, whose value would be tied to the dollar. Import taxes were reduced. The economic reforms also called for privatization of state owned companies, even the most profitable ones.

Needless to say the initial results of economic growth seemed to make Cardoso popular with many. Hyperinflation ended and the economy improved. But the euphoria would not last.

As Cardoso worked with the Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to run for re-election, the international economy that Brazil slowly became integrated to went through several crisis.

The Cardoso administration gave up some control over the economy in return for stability from the International Monetary Fund for relief in 1998.

By the summer of 1998, 30 billion dollars were drained from Brazil's currency reserves. As crisis loomed, Cardoso had to run for re-election in 1998. The IMF came to the rescue of the Cardoso's reelection bid. They offered Brazil a 41.7 billion dollar bailout.

This gave the economy a fake sense of stability to allow for Cardoso's reelection. Cardoso won and as part of the agreement with the IMF required budget cuts and higher taxes in the order of 22.5 billion dollars. The Brazilian people paid a hefty price for this fictitious sense of economic stability.

This package failed because two months after the details of the agreement were released 20 billion dollars left the country. These bailouts did not even provide Brazil with the investor confidence they claimed to provide! The IMF used the tumultuous second term of the Cardoso administration to make further inroads in having control over the economy.

It is unfortunate to say that the Brazilian domestic economy never recovered. Brazil's economy up until today stagnates, its internal and external debt is at massive proportions and the current taxation levels are at astronomical proportions.

But beyond just losing the opportunity to expand its domestic economy, Brazil lost something even more important than its economy: its economic sovereignty.

In 1999, during the devaluation of the Brazilian currency. a crisis erupted. The international community predicated economic chaos. Cardoso fired an economics professor Francisco Lopes whose short tenure as central bank president scared investors further.

In order to rebuild investor confidence in the Brazilian economy, Cardoso appointed Arminio Fraga who worked for international speculator, George Soros.

Fraga's ability to maneuver Brazil away from its crisis made him popular with some and that is why he stayed in office until the end of Cardoso's administration in 2002.

But he maintained the high interest rates policy that has indebted the domestic economy in the name of fighting inflation, which scares international investors.

Then came the 2002 elections. Throughout most of 2002, the international capital inside of Brazil began to panic. They pulled investment out of Brazil at a rapid pace fearing that the current president Lula would harm their investments.

This capital outflow, was not derailed by unconventional capital controls (used in Malaysia and China) but by raising interests, choking the economy and curtailing inflation. But this traditional economic method once again failed to stop the hemorrhaging of capital.

The economy was near the brink of default when the International Monetary Fund (IMF) stepped in again all over Brazil's political sovereignty. They demanded that then president Cardoso get the left-wing candidates, who had scared the market to sign an agreement they had formulated would maintain their hold on the Brazilian economy.

They asked that a primary surplus of at least 3.75 percent be maintained. If any candidate did not sign it, they would have likely caused further distress on the fragile economy and likely been attacked for putting his own interests above the ailing economy.

Needless to say, the top four candidates did sign the agreement in behest of the international community. This agreement with future candidates severely curtailed the ability of future administrations to correct the current economic doldrums.

The international capital invested in Brazil was still wary of any administration not deemed as supporting neo-liberalism. Most of the bailout made ready for Brazil, roughly 24 billion dollars was on condition of future economic measures. They waited for Lula's economic policy to develop.

With the economy suffering from lack of credit, high interests and mounting debt repayments any small misstep by Lula could have led to an extremely large default. So, Lula appointed the ex-president of the Fleet Bank, Henrique Meirelles.

There were plenty of smart competent economists in Brazil, with the required knowledge to run a central bank effectively. But Lula appointed Mr. Meirelles because it was a friendly gesture to the international community.

He needed to regain their confidence, otherwise the dependent economy would end up like the defunct Argentinean economy. Just like Cardoso in 1999, when he fired Francisco Lopes and hired Arminio Fraga, a Wall Street guru.

By having influence over the chosen central bank president, the neo-liberal forces put pressure on Brazil to maintain extremely low inflation. Economic growth did not matter, and neither did the rising tide of debt.

All that mattered was that the battle for low inflation continue. In order to curtail inflation fears, the government's only move was to raise interest rates to weaken the economy. As it did this, companies failed and workers were laid-off. This weakening of the economy was used to cool off any sudden inflationary pressures.

But as witnessed in 1999, cutting interest rates does not always push up inflation in Brazil. From late 1999 until the end of 2000 interest rates fell throughout this period. Inflation stayed at stable rate while the economy actually made a sustainable recovery.

This was a start but it was not enough to gain the true confidence of the international community. More needed to be done in order to bring back inflows to Brazil. Lula supported Finance Minister Antonio Palocci advice to hike the primary surplus to 4.25 percent of the GDP above the minimum 3.75 percent set by the IMF agreement.

They even moved it up further in 2004, to 4.50 percent in a failed  attempt to cool inflation and thus avoiding further interest rate adjustments by the Central Bank.

This is a lot more than was agreed to by the International Monetary Fund. The more Brazil pays in its primary surplus, the more money is leaving for the international credit agencies, US and mostly European banks and other credit agencies.

Today Brazil's private and public sector pays nearly 300 billion reais (US$ 111 billion) a year to service its entire debt. The economic situation has not changed as Lula promised during his campaign. The politics behind the economics is still today held in the hands of international community.

The government continues to be hamstrung by the IMF. Since 1998 they have made agreements on the results of their economy. Lula has signed agreements from 2003 until the present with the agency.

Many are hoping that when this agreement expires, in 2005, Brazilians will regain control of their battered economy if Lula refuses to sign a new agreement. Because the current obsession with inflation is just holding back the economy after one successful year of growth.

In 2000, when interest rates fell throughout most of the year the economy grew by 4.4 percent. Then in early 2001, the Central Bank was scared of an overheating economy leading to inflation that it began to raise rates.

At that time, an electricity crisis occurred and growth went back to a stagnant level. A similar situation developed in 2004. Rates fell throughout the end of 2003 and throughout 2004 and this led to economic growth at 5.3 percent.

But once again in late 2004, rates went up because the Central bank policy makers feared the return of inflation causing them to miss their targeted inflation rate.

The economy will grow much slower in 2005 than in 2004. Even the neo-liberal supporting voice, The Economist, supports a minor adjustment to the inflation targeting system to allow for lower interest rates and a little more inflation.

It seems that the IMF and IFIs have some unduly political influence in Brazilian politics. And by using this influence they are able to maintain a favor economic policy tailored to their needs.

One can only hope that with the end of the IMF agreement, Brazilians will be given back their sovereignty over their economic future and control their own destiny.

Daniel Torres is a student of Political Science and Economics at the University of Massachusetts. Comments welcome at dftorres@gmail.com.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (9)Add Comment
Honor thy debts or die
written by Guest, March 27, 2005
I’m quite happy Lula agreed to honor the IMF loan and hope that he continues to do so - the country is far more stable today than it has ever been (using the political and economic scaffolding that Cardoso constructed). Only recently, article after article is being written about Brasil´s prosperity, new records in exports, new jobs, a growing middle class and a much more vibrant economy (hard power) etc. Brasil is also being praised for her international leadership: G22, Haiti, Battling hunger (soft power). The debt will eventually be paid down (especially if we can further crack down on corruption, cronyism, unnecessary and costly officialdom that does far more harm to our economy and development than any outside force ever could) THEN Brasil will not only have more sovereignty over it’s own economy, but it will have earned even more of world’s trust and respect.

>>>>Many are hoping that when this agreement expires, in 2005, Brazilians will regain control of their battered economy if Lula refuses to sign a new agreement.

This type of attitude scares the hell out of me. If there is any suggestion that this will take place in the future, I’ll sell everything and flee. Beware of what you ask for (but then again it’s all nice and easy to scream “ REVOLUTION” for a country you don’t live in). Look to Argentina to see the affects of reneging on a debt. Why were they in such dire straights to begin with? CORRUPTION. Argentina went from being the Paris of Latin America; to being just one more violent, impoverished 3rd world country lumped in with the rest – literally over night.

After years of building up our soft power in the international arena (as well as a stable economy – not perfect, but better than we’ve seen in decades), would you really like us to toss all that away, and race back to the days of being just ONE more shaky Banana republic on the verge of collapse?

By the way, nice math skills:
>>>>>>>>>>.300 billion reais (US$ 111 million)
ROFL
DT, returns
written by Guest, March 28, 2005
Well let me first respond to the post made above by ROFL.

First of all, let me state that I did not put 111 million dollars, that was done by the editor. I am sure everybody knows that it was suppose to be billions not millions.
Besides that, your statement that I am screaming, "revolution" is just not true. Yes, many on the Left scream for a social revolution, but I am not one of those. I am person who actually believes in capitalism, I just dont agree that the state of the Brazilian economy is anywhere near the level. And personally, I look at the figures of the Cardoso administration to see that. Look at where the tax level was when Cardoso took office? It was at 24 %, then it went up to 36% some claim even higher near 40 percent. Where is the money going to? Higher taxes kill jobs! The policy of excessive low inflation rates is something else that Brazil must complete. And I agree that indexation of wages to inflation was wrong and a major mistake. You cant run your economy because doing indexation in that way is crazy and will lead to hyperinflation. Also very low interest rates is crazy, because it creates too much influx of money in the economy creating inflation. So, I believe that during the 60's and 70 boom of the Brazilian economy the authorities never tightened their interest rates enough to keep a lid inflation. Eventually external things happened and well you know the story.
Lower taxes are good, I am actually attacking IMF from a true believer in capitalism. They promote bad economic policy. Trust me, Republicans hate them as much as liberal democrats. Capitalism, is just not as vibrant as it should be and Cardoso did nothing to change that. Look at the bureaucracy! Nothing changed. Growth, average below 3 percent just like the 1980's Lost Decade. I am sorry, if you think that it is better to grow below 3 percent and call it stable fine but Brazilians deserve better and it can happen. Once you stop listening to stupid people like Palocci, Malan and Delfim Netto who talk about reducing taxes and suddosedly care about the economy. They dont do none of this, but maintain the control. Tax cuts stimulate growth and actually creates more revenue for the government but see the IMF and the international speculators only care about Brazil's budget deficit and what not! They panic to hear that Brazilians are cutting taxes in a major way to stimulate the economy or that Brazil will lower rates against trying to hit very low targets. But is it fair that India's economy grows rapidly but it has a budget deficit of almost 9 percent. No one fears them defaulting. They have lower taxes and more growth than Brazil.

Second main point I want to make is about the terms you used refering to the economy. I will give you credit that the economy is stable. But what is stability all about? About keeping things the same and not messing up (like Argentina right?) But stability is also hurting Brazil's ability to take risks (like cutting taxes) to stimulate more growth and make the economy more vibrant. The Chinese dont have a stable economy, they have a vibrant economy that is creating jobs. It is an agreessive economy, that is expanding leaps and bounds. It some senses it is less stable than the Brazilian economy, but it is growing so much faster. .
Brazil needs a stronger, more vibrant economy, not stability.
Plus, the figures of the Brazilian economy are not sutabile for stability. 40 million Brazilians live in some sort of poverty. Ownership of land is one of the most inequal in the world. Their needs to be a more rapid land reform, stability is not going to change things. I think change is needed, I am progressive. Brazil's economy needs lower taxes and to control spending on its bureaucracy (never done by Cardoso or Lula). But in order to reduce the budget deficit, interest rates need to come down. If they dont the cycle of more debt will continue. Corruption exists in every country around the world, especially in countries with huge bureaucracies.

Here's a key point, the IMF talks about the US economy, but no one cares about their opinion. Bush, listens to his advisors not the IMF. They lower interest rates and cut taxes when the economy weakens, explain to me why this does not happen in Brazil or in most Latin American economies when their is an economic downturn? Dont say corruption because thats too simple. Corruption exists in Chile, but they are a more vibrant economy.

Next thing, did you admit to me that if Brazilians took control of their economy that you would sell everything and leave! So does that mean that today, Brazilians have lost some control of their economy? Is that right or did I read in too much into it?

In my conclusion let me state a few things. I am realist, not a marxist and I think liberal (and neoliberals) are wrong on almost everything. Thats my viewpoint and I will express it
But I have one favor to ask. Your attacks of my opinion of my articles are welcoming.
But please do me one huge favor, dont attack because I dont live in Brazil. I left at the age of 5, with my family. I did not have a say in where I lived for the past 15 years of my life. I love my country and I will express my opinion whenever I see problems. I am not one of those Brazilians who leave their country and avoid their heritage and cultural. I visit Brazil every chance I get and I plan to make my life their in the near future. Thanks.

IMF leaves
written by Guest, March 29, 2005
Finally, Lula has done the right thing by making sure the Brazilian economy can survive without the supposed stability of the IMF!
IMF leaves
written by Guest, March 29, 2005
I think you don´t understand what is happening. Brasil isn´t renewing the latest 40 billion dollar accord. They don´t need to draw any more money from it. It has nothing to do with Brazil severing ties altogether with the IMF. There is still the question of about 300,000,000 dollars outstanding.
IMF leaves ad
written by Guest, March 29, 2005
But I forgot to add. It´s still a great sign.
IMF
written by Guest, March 30, 2005
Of course Brazil is not renewing its latest accord, but people cant just stop talking to the IMF when you owe the most amoung of debt in the developing world! Brazil owes some 300 billion dollars, almost 1 trillion reais. But you must admit that an economy without the assitance of the IMF is an economy that is less dependent which makes it a stronger economy, one which is finally able to walk "on his own two feet".
WORLD ECONOMY
written by Guest, March 30, 2005
There is no such thing as economic sovereignty in this day and age. If it were not for foreign investment and the IMF the Brazilian economy would have collapsed. Plus Lula's desire to strengthen the REAL to the dollar has done little to help the value of Brazilian exports.
...
written by Guest, March 30, 2005
There is no such thing as economic sovereignty in this day and age.

This is something that Brazil can´t seem to grasp. They want it both ways. First they want to take advantage of all that Globalization has to offer (look at all the deals with China - Café Pelé anyone? Christ, the Chinese are now making Brazilian Jets! Let´s move more of our infrastructure over into RED CHINA and keep O povo Brasiliero unemployed), yet, they LOVE to scream "economic sovereignty" whenever the nationalists or mind numbed povo are in earshot. Sure they´ll borrow billions, but heaven forbid anyone should suggest a more responsible way of spending it, or the terms of how it´s to be paid back.
...
written by Guest, June 20, 2005
You've already lost your country. First, the US bankers bought out all you debt paper and resold it to the Communist Red Chinese. Now the ChiComs are taking possession. At the same time, Russia, who would have ever imagined it, are making nice with Lula (as is Castro).

Nationalism might actually be a good thing.


Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack