Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083649

Who's Online

We have 560 guests online



US Ultimatum to Brazil: Get Rid of Piracy or Else PDF Print E-mail
2005 - May 2005
Written by Clara Angelica Porto   
Monday, 23 May 2005 09:30

Piracy of CDs and movies, a big problem in BrazilThe United States gave Brazil a deadline: the country has 6 months to combat illegal production of CDs, videos and the like. After this the US will start applying commercial fines.

Despite the fact that many have read the news as an arrogant and unfriendly ultimatum, Brazil is busy at work. A commission is being created to deal with the problem, which is much bigger than the selling in the streets.

Action is needed in several instances, including the reduction of price of certain goods, which would make it less of a target for illegal copies. The deadline went to Brazil, but it should apply everywhere, including on the streets of New York City.

Condoleezza, VIP Indeed

As a result of the meeting she had with Minister José Dirceu, Condoleezza Rice went to Brazil on April 26. The preparations to receive the most powerful woman in the world was dramatic, to say the least.

Up to 20 employees of the United States Embassy were seen camping at the Blue Tree Park Hotel in Brasília, where Ms. Rice stayed, preparing for her arrival.

Rice asked Lula for two things and was denied both. The US wanted Lula to have a talk with Venezuela Chávez to convince him to stop aggravating the White House. Sorry, but can't do it - Lula organized a group called friends of Venezuela and Petrobras is doing excellent business in the oil fields.

The other no for Condoleezza was when she asked Lula to allow American observers during the meeting of leaders of South American and Arab countries. Sorry again.

34 countries, 24 of which Arab national, met in Brasília to discuss their commercial possibilities and political afinities. It is strong.

In Colombia, the next day, Condy made strong statements on the Venezuela affair. If the US decide to go strong on Venezuela, will Brazil have to make a decision? Or as they say in Brazil, business is business, friendship aside?...

The Brazilian government will have a lot of diplomatic work ahead to keep its own interests and to keep in good terms with the US and the rest of the world. All at the same time.

No Visa

During Mercosur's top leaders meeting in historical Ouro Preto, Brazil, earlier this year, Peru's president Alejandro Toledo said all Latin countries should be partners.

He went on to say that Peru is not only referring to commercial relations, but it feels contaminated by an optimism of integration among all Latin countries in America.

Toledo said Peru attended the meeting for reasons other than commercial, because this would not even be good business for Peru at the moment.

The President made clear for all that Peru's presence was a statement for the future, referring to the physical integration and infrastructure investments towards uniting the countries.

Toledo affirmed that it was important that people from the countries united in the block and associates, could go back and forth without visas or even passports, taking away unnecessary paper work.

Misery Doesn't Sell

Brazil year in France is already showing results. The Brazilian chain of super-markets Pão de Açúcar launches a partnership agreement with French chain Casino, starting this coming June.

President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva was present at the moment of the announcement. He made a speech and seemed very happy with the repercussion of Brazil in France and all over Europe, with the growing interest in all things Brazilian.

Lula was applauded with enthusiasm when he said that "Brazil may continue calling itself a poor country, or a third world country, or even a country of illiteracy, because one may choose any words one wishes but one must keep in kind that selling misery does not absolutely help anyone to get rid of misery."

Globo More Global

Globo Network.TV, Brazilian's number 1 and the world's 4, is going to be bigger. Ricardo Scalamandré, the net's director of international business, met with producers from all over the globe in Cannes.

Globo is discussing serious business with TVs in Russia, France, Germany, Romania and Spain. The idea is to start a co-production that involves making shows that might not even be shown in Brazil. Just using the network know-how.

Reinvesting Every Penny

Antônio Ermírio de Moraes of Votorantim group, one of the biggest entrepreneurs in Brazil, recently told the press that Brazilian entrepreneurs are going to throw every cent back into production.

According to him, not a cent will be saved, every single penny will be used to increase production, because they now believe more and more in Brazil and the growth and stability of the economy. Antônio Ermírio constitutes strong leadership in Brazil.

Drops

* The New York Times is producing a story on Brazilian food, concentrating on appetizers.They are going all over the country. Extra pounds expected among the crew.

* Tokyo Marine announced it has bought Banco Real's Insurance company for R$ 500 milllion. This is only the beginning of heavy Japanese investing in Brazil.

* Brazilian filmmaker Luiz Carlos Barreto is having 16 of his movies exhibited in 18 cities, starting in Paris. In the catalogue, Costa-Gavras writes that Barreto produced over 75 films, all expressions of "passions for his country, Brazil."

* Cachaça 51 is being exported to Russia.The caipirinha now is to compete with the vodka. It is the 39th country conquered by the sugar cane liquor.

* When Brazil's Minister of Culture, Gilberto Gil, invited Sharon Stone earlier this year in Davos to go to Brazil for the International Forum of the Creative Industry (films, shows and the like), many thought she was just being pleasant when she smiled and said yes. Wrong. Sharon Stone did go to the forum in Salvador, Bahia, on April 19. And crossed her legs hundreds of times.

* The Brazilian "Tainá 2" was the best film of BamKids Film Festival in Brooklyn.

* Leaders of the National Brazilian Association of Hospitality Industry met with Congress' President, Severino Cavalcanti, to ask to speed up the process of Law 2430/03, written by Senator Carlos Eduardo Cadoca, from Recife, proposing the end of visa for American tourists.

* Meanwhile, at the American Consulate in Recife, a 22-year-old student of Psychology was denied a tourist visa and told by the officer to "get older before you visit N.Y." Now you get scolded?
 
Clara Angelica Porto is a Brazilian bilingual journalist living in New York. She went to school in Brazil and at the University of Wisconsin in Madison. Clara is presently working as the English writer for The Brasilians, a monthly newspaper in Manhattan. She is also the Marketing Coordinator for Brazilian Day in New York. Of herself, she says "Words have been the most important part of my professional life. Either written or spoken. And I don't have an accent when I write..." Comments welcome at clara.angelica@gmail.com.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (57)Add Comment
Governments and Life !
written by Guest, May 24, 2005
I am from the United States and I have traveled to Brasil for several years.I love Brasil,its culture,food,music and beautiful people.I have noticed that more and more Brasilians are disliking American tourists.I feel this is very sad, it's not the people of a country but the governments for the most part.America needs to unite with Canada,Mexico,Central America and South America.Mr. Bush needs to concentrate on working with theses countries and helping each other.I speak for most American's,we want to get along with other countries and respect each other.People in all coutries have to stand up to their governments and say no more corruption. Most Americans don't want to rule the world,they want a save place,a place for their children and for all of earth's creatures .God bless us all!
Then Why?
written by Guest, May 24, 2005
"I speak for most American's,we want to get along with other countries and respect each other . . . Most Americans don't want to rule the world,they want a save place,a place for their children and for all of earth's creatures "

Americans voted for Bush (the second time anyway). That fact sadly seems to belie your claim.
how many actually voted
written by Guest, May 24, 2005
most americans didnt vote for anybody
Not Many
written by Guest, May 24, 2005
Most Americans dislike the Republican/Democratic rule of the Unidos Estados and refuse to vote for either. There are approximately 120 million people out of a population of 280 million who felt the need to vote! The remainder would just as soon be left alone by the two dominant parties! Did you get this, parties, parties, parties!!!!! If you are not invited to the party dont expect to get anything! Most Americans are not invited, and are left out in the cold. However when George Hitler Bush tries to push his version of democracy onto the rest of the world we now have 150 million Americans trying to impose its will on 6 billion people of other nations who would just as soon not be bothered with the political philosphies of George Hitler Bush and his minions. It's no wonder that people hate Americans when Americans allow morons like George Hitler Bush to push other nations as represented by their leaders around with his tough talk and veiled threats of military action by what is the most powerful military in the history of mankind! Why do you need a powful military? Because if you have a weak one, some Saddam or Hitler will come in a steamroll your military into oblivion! What the Unidos Estados have right now is a Saddam/Hitler/Stalin in Bush, not to mention his father the older Bush. What does a dictator do? It does what moronic dictators do best! Destroy the will of people with different philosophies, cultures, and ways of doing things. The United States is a country in serious decline. It is drowning in the quicksand of its evil laws, morals, and treatment of people in general. The United States was built as a crooked house with the imposition of slavery. It has not been able to shake off its voracious appetite for low or better yet free labor. It has not made reparations to those it enslaved! The only thing that can be done to a crooked house to fix it, is to tear it down and rebuild it. But for now the world is stuck with looking at the United States as it would lokk at the leaning tower of Pisa in France, with a curious wonder!
Hehehe
written by Guest, May 24, 2005
The Leaning Tower of Pisa is in Italy, LOL
They voted
written by Guest, May 24, 2005
"most americans didnt vote for anybody"

Not voting is a kind of vote. It says I don't give a s**t. Any person in the US who didn't vote last time was saying that Bush's policies were just fine with them. So, don't try to "speak for most Americans" when most Americans are apparently too lazy or stupid to care. They are just as responsible for Bush's policies as those who voted for him. And if they in fact do not agree with his policies, they are particularly at fault.
Oh my!!
written by Guest, May 24, 2005
Dude... if you seriously think Bush is the only problem here... you're seriously mistaken. It seems to be "fashionable" these days to bash on Americans and blame all the world problems on the US. Most people should begin by looking in the mirror and begin there.
...
written by Guest, May 25, 2005
If we rebuild our " crooked house" It will be built better than before. Be careful what you wish for.
Dude
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
Who said "Bush is the only problem here"? Can you read? Maybe you're too busy looking in the mirror, dude.
My word!!
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
Oh, yes, "fashionable." That's rich. It's "fashionable" to resent US bullying. I guess it's "fashionable" for the US to stick it's nose into everyone else's business too, then, be it Latin America or the Middle East. Fashion follows fashion. Thanks again, Dr. Phil. I'll now go "look in the mirror and begin there." And tomorrow, I'll "wake up and smell the coffee." Then maybe I'll start to "own my own problems." I'll forget the crimes that have been and are being committed, the meddling, the covert operations, misinformation, wars, torture … that's just too "fashionable."
...
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
America leads the world in sh-t stirring activities. America is a greedy profit driven country that kicks her own workers in the butts so of course she cares little for foreign workers. The streets of America's major cities are filled with hordes of homeless, hungry people who fell through the very wide cracks of American poverty.

America wants no competition. That is why she is preventing all but a few white supremacist countries like herself from amassing nuclear weapons. America wants to remain the only world superpower able to bomb any country out of existence who refuses to bend over and take that kick in the ass. She is over in Iraq now trying to kick them in the butt, bullsh-tting the world that she is there to "liberate" the Iraqi people. Those people were 100 times better under the rule of Sadaam Hussein.

America has never gone anywhere for humanitarian purposes. Wherever the US military goes it brings death and destruction to the people as America continues on her quest to become the Great White Father of the Universe stealing all of the lands and goods of everyone else toppling governments who are "for the people". America wants every country led by brutal deranged dictators who will institute wholesale sweatshop labor for American multinationals. America also kicks the butts of her own citizens selling their jobs overseas to someone who will work for nothing.

America is a white supremacist bully. A nation controlled by thugs and mobsters on a worldwide rampage to snatch the goods of other people.
American
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
First off, the US was formed on the principle of freedom and many of the US citizens hold true to those values, unfortunately the government leaders of our country have become corrupted and are following their own beliefs, despite the protests of many US citizens. Many US citizens don't believe in what Bush is doing around the world and the people of our country should not be judged by one moron's actions. Second of all, it was innapropriate to call Bush, Hitler. He may be a bad president but he has not killed 6 million people.
Re: hehehe
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
Thanks for correcting my error. However France is where it belongs!
Re: American
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
Freedom for whom! Slavery was written into the American Constitution! America was built on the backs of enslaved white and black (mostly) Americans. Then it (America) blows its horn and says "give me all your tired and fed up citizens, send them over here and like the giant Black Widow spider that I am, I can suck the life out of them too! America is a fraud! It says one thing and does another! It's like a man talking out of both sides of his mouth! If more Americans would get passports and go to other parts of the world, they probably would not come back!
Re: American
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
More like Count Dracula, or should I say Count AMERICA!
Re: Dude
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
I know exactly what you are talking about when you say "be careful what you wish for." However one fact escapes your notice, it is already happening!
Re: Dude
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
Get your passports, boats, private planes ready, America is morphing into a dictatorship! Tomorrows headlines will read, "Americans are the new w*****ks." Rush to southern, and northern borders un-presedented in human history. "Americans found packed in 50' semi trucks." "Gringos form refugee camps in Baja California." "Sharks take bites out of Americans swimming around the Imperial Beach border fence."
Re: Dude
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
Coast Guard cutters stopping all outbound boating traffic to check for Americans with outstanding debts, warrants, pissed off ex-wives, deadbeat dads, drunks, crackheads, pimps, prostitutes, crooked politicians, and businessmen, Marhta Stewart, Bernie Ebbers, Oprah Winfrey, Kenneth Lay, George & Laura Bush, the girls did'nt come since they were getting drunk at TGI Friday's.
American
written by Guest, May 26, 2005
America did have slavery, but since then thousands of Americans fought for their freedom in the Civil War and lost their lives. The point is even though the US has made mistakes, they have done a lot of good too and it's citizens are happy that they can live freely and happily. It's not fair to judge the people of the United States by what President Bush has done. You say we are stupid because we voted for Bush but about half of us didn't and we hate him just as much as you guys do. So don't hate Americans because of Bush, we don't all like him.
Amerian
written by Guest, May 27, 2005
Why do you think Bush and other political leaders make headline new?...Because they are outragous enough to make it, around the world. My mother is from Centeral America. Believe me if it was not for some major factors i would not be living here. if you find the quiter, non-headline news making orginazations and people you see for the most part they dont support Bush. They are good people trying to out live the bad, but what makes headline news? the good or the bad? The world leaders who are doing outragous things.
American 2
written by Guest, May 27, 2005
OMG! Julia I totally agree with you!
...
written by Guest, May 27, 2005
"it was innapropriate to call Bush, Hitler"
Agreed. It cheapens the criticism he deserves.
Definetly
written by Guest, May 27, 2005
Bush is pretty awful but he should not be compared with Hitler.
...
written by Guest, May 27, 2005
Bush is not the problem, and besides, intellectual property rights are important. I work hard to write and produce my songs and distribute my CDs and it costs a LOT of money. It is very hard to get the money back and then make a profit. This is theft of money from people like me. People are missing the point when they ignore that and I am glad that something is being done. Too many governments, like Brazil, have ignored the issue for too long. It does not matter whether they like the American government or its policies. What matters is the moral issue of theft. Brazil would be the first country to make a huge fuss on the international stage and demand protection if its own property and people were being robbed this way. The fact that Brazil fails to protect its own creative artists is very sad. No wonder it is so hard for musicians to make a living there. I love and respect Brazilian culture and music, but we have to draw the line somewhere.
Intellectual Property
written by Guest, May 27, 2005
"Brazil would be the first country to make a huge fuss on the international stage and demand protection if its own property and people were being robbed this way. The fact that Brazil fails to protect its own creative artists is very sad." That is oddly both an unsubstantiated claim and self-contradictory. Congratulations.

Hey, guess what? No one is stealing your music. Anyway, musicians are starting to realize that sharing music on the internet is a path to success and that the old mode of control is becoming obsolete. Grow into technology. Use it to your advantage.
RE:Dude
written by Guest, May 28, 2005
Brazil and other countries need to focus on their own problems and stop focusing on the US. Bush or whomever happens to be the US President will always be in the world news... for as long as the US is a superpower.

Do you realize that Brazil has the highest murder rate than any other country in the world. More Brazilians are murdered each day than Iraqies and Americans have died since the beginning of the war... what is Lula doing about that?? Nothing... If you are comparing Bush to Hilter... then words can't describe what Lula is!
RE:Dude
written by Guest, May 28, 2005
Brazil and other countries need to focus on their own problems and stop focusing on the US. Bush or whomever happens to be the US President will always be in the world news... for as long as the US is a superpower.

Do you realize that Brazil has the highest murder rate than any other country in the world. More Brazilians are murdered each day than Iraqies and Americans have died since the beginning of the war... what is Lula doing about that?? Nothing... If you are comparing Bush to Hilter... then words can't describe what Lula is!
RE: Dude
written by Guest, May 28, 2005
"Brazil and other countries need to focus on their own problems and stop focusing on the US. Bush or whomever happens to be the US President will always be in the world news... for as long as the US is a superpower."

You don't think Brasil is focusing on its own problems? You don't knowwhat you're talking about. Just who are you to presume to tell Brasilians or other nations how to think? You also have no idea how influential the US is in international politics and economics, which is really astounding. Very ignorant.

"Do you realize that Brazil has the highest murder rate than any other country in the world. More Brazilians are murdered each day than Iraqies and Americans have died since the beginning of the war... what is Lula doing about that?? Nothing... If you are comparing Bush to Hilter... then words can't describe what Lula is!"

Again, ignorant. You have no idea what the Lula administration is trying to accomplish every day, do you? One thing you should know is that Lula is not waging illegal wars on other countries. Lula is not performing "extraordinary renditions" of people to countries in order to torture them by proxy.

Tell you what, when the US minds its own business and stops committing crimes internationally, no other countries will worry about the crimes being committed inside the US. Deal?
Focus, Dude
written by Guest, May 28, 2005
When Lieutenant General Ricardo Sanchez testified before the Senate Armed Services Committee last year, he was asked whether he "ordered or approved the use of sleep deprivation, intimidation by guard dogs, excessive noise, and inducing fear as an interrogation method for a prisoner in Abu Ghraib prison." Sanchez, who was head of the Pentagon’s Combined Joint Task Force-7 in Iraq, swore the answer was no. Under oath, he told the Senators he "never approved any of those measures to be used."

But a document the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) obtained from the Pentagon flat out contradicts Sanchez’s testimony. It’s a memorandum entitled "CJTF-7 Interrogation and Counter-Resistance Policy," dated September 14, 2003. In it, Sanchez approved several methods designed for "significantly increasing the fear level in a detainee." These included "sleep management"; "yelling, loud music, and light control: used to create fear, disorient detainee, and prolong capture shock"; and "presence of military working dogs: exploits Arab fear of dogs."

On March 30, the ACLU wrote a letter to Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, urging him "to open an investigation into whether General Ricardo A. Sanchez committed perjury in his sworn testimony."

The problem is, Gonzales may himself have committed perjury in his Congressional testimony this January. According to a March 6 article in The New York Times, Gonzales submitted written testimony that said: "The policy of the United States is not to transfer individuals to countries where we believe they likely will be tortured, whether those individuals are being transferred from inside or outside the United States." He added that he was "not aware of anyone in the executive branch authorizing any transfer of a detainee in violation of that policy."

"That’s a clear, absolute lie," says Michael Ratner, executive director of the Center for Constitutional Rights, who is suing Administration officials for their involvement in the torture scandal. "The Administration has a policy of sending people to countries where there is a likelihood that they will be tortured."

Both Human Rights Watch and Amnesty International USA say there is "prima facie" evidence against Rumsfeld for war crimes and torture. And Amnesty International USA says there is also "prima facie" evidence against Bush for war crimes and torture. (According to Random House Webster’s Unabridged Dictionary, "prima facie evidence" is "evidence sufficient to establish a fact or to raise a presumption of fact unless rebutted.")

The case against Rumsfeld may be the most substantial of all. While "expressing no opinion about the ultimate guilt or innocence" of Rumsfeld, Human Rights Watch is urging his prosecution under the War Crimes Act of 1996 and the Anti-Torture Act of 1996. Under these statutes, a "war crime" is any "grave breach" of common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions, which prohibits "outrages upon personal dignity, in particular, humiliating and degrading treatment," as well as torture and murder. A "grave breach," according to U.S. law, includes "willful killing, torture, or inhuman treatment of prisoners of war and of other ‘protected persons,’ " Human Rights Watch explains in "Getting Away with Torture?"

Rumsfeld faces jeopardy for being head of the Defense Department when those directly under him committed grave offenses. And he may be liable for actions he himself undertook.

"Secretary Rumsfeld may bear legal liability for war crimes and torture by U.S. troops in Afghanistan, Iraq, and Guantánamo under the doctrine of ‘command responsibility’—the legal principle that holds a superior responsible for crimes committed by his subordinates when he knew or should have known that they were being committed but fails to take reasonable measures to stop them," Human Rights Watch says in its report.

But Rumsfeld’s potential liability may be more direct than simply being the guy in charge who didn’t stop the torture and mistreatment once he learned about it.

First of all, when the initial reports of prisoner mistreatment came in, he mocked the concerns of human rights groups as "isolated pockets of international hyperventilation." He also asserted that "unlawful combatants do not have any rights under the Geneva Convention," even though, as Human Rights Watch argues, "the Geneva Conventions provide explicit protections to all persons captured in an international armed conflict, even if they are not entitled to POW status."

Secondly, he himself issued a list of permissible interrogation techniques in a December 2, 2002, directive that likely violated the Geneva Conventions, according to Human Rights Watch. Among those techniques: "The use of stress positions (like standing) for a maximum of four hours." On the directive, Rumsfeld, incidentally, added in his own handwriting next to this technique: "However, I stand for 8-10 hours a day. Why is standing limited to 4 hours?" He also included the following techniques: "removal of all comfort items (including religious items)," "deprivation of light and auditory stimuli," "isolation up to 30 days," and "using detainees’ individual phobias (such as fear of dogs) to induce stress."
RE: Dude - Ignorant??
written by Guest, May 29, 2005
"You don't think Brasil is focusing on its own problems? You don't knowwhat you're talking about. Just who are you to presume to tell Brasilians or other nations how to think? "

So please... back up what you're saying . Provide some facts. I'm not telling what others should think... just sending back some criticism your way. Of course, it's OK for you to criticize Americans.. but God forbid if an American criticizes your government.

Yeah Lula has done a lot. Free speach would be a crime if Lula has he way. He's done almost none of what he promised during his election. He's bought himself a new Rolls Royce and Jet. He's aligned himself with the likes of Chavez and Castro. Yeah he's done a lot of good (I'm being sarcastic here). The gap between the wealthy and the poor is growing...etc...

I love Brazil, it's culture, people, food, etc... I just can't stand their government. Lula is weak and a fraud. Henrique was a much better President.

I'm open to criticism... but the hate and anger you write without backing it up.. doesn't do anyone good!
Re: Focus, Dude
written by Guest, May 29, 2005
... to bad you had to cut and paste an article... it would have been nice if you could form your own opinion and past it here..
Re: Focus, Dude
written by Guest, May 29, 2005
That's your idea of criticism? That's the best you can come up with? To criticize the use of information? I didn't puport to claim the veracity of the information. It was pasted for what it is worth: Information. It would be nice if you had the brains to respond to the information stated in the quoted article. But, clearly you don't and you can't. That is the tactic of an ignorant coward who knows that he hasn't a leg to stand on, so he tries to dismiss the information by attacking the person who presented it.
Yes, dude, ignorant
written by Guest, May 29, 2005
Yes, it's okay for me to criticize the US. I'm a US citizen. But that doesn't really matter, because the US meddles in the business of sovereign nations throughout the world. That is sufficiently well documented. That gives anyone license to criticize the US on its foreign policy, including Brazilians.

Yes, you are telling other people what to think. In fact, you wrote, "Brazil and other countries need to focus on their own problems and stop focusing on the US. Bush . . ."

Your post demonstrates that you are extremely misinformed about Brazil and the Lula administration. Indeed, as is typical of Lula critics, you criticize him for not accomplishing “most” of his policy objectives. Perhaps you don’t understand that Brazil is not a dictatorship and that Lula cannot accomplish his goals by fiat. Of course, you don’t really want him to accomplish those objectives. Every time he accomplishes something, you scream about it. You rejoice in failure, not accomplishment. I’m surprised you didn’t also criticize Lula’s accomplishments by claiming they supposedly result exclusively from continuation of the policies of Cardozo, which is an equally ridiculous criticism often parroted by Lula’s critics.

It is also clear that you either do not understand the magnitude of problems facing Brazil or you are so ideological in your thinking that you are deliberately being obtuse in order to criticize Lula.

I’m not here to prop-up Lula. I don’t vote in Brazil, so it’s none of my business. But, you are misinformed. The accomplishments are many for Lula, who in addition to reeling Brazil back from the economic abyss in 2004, oversaw the country's successful challenge of U.S. cotton subsidies in the World Trade Organization, the first time in its history a developing nation won in the WTO forum against a super power. Britain also invited Brazil to attend this year’s G7 meeting, which was seen as a sign that Brazil is on the cusp of being considering a legitimate global economic power. In Haiti, Brazil has led the U.N. military contingent that has at least kept the impoverished nation from exploding in violence. And even as he resists the Bush administration's overtures on a larger American free-trade agreement, Lula has worked to broaden the scope of Mercosur, a trade alliance among Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay, by negotiating an agreement between Mercosur and the European Union. The government has made progress toward rooting out and prosecuting corruption, a monumental task which predates Lula by decades. Personal computer use in homes has increased. It is a leader in HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment. It is a leader in alternative energy source development and use, like biodiesel. The program Zero Fome, while mired in troubles, continues to proceed in spite of the right wing’s jubilant dancing on its grave, proving they don’t care about alleviating poverty and hunger. And actually, while the gap between the rich and poor in Latin America in general has become worse, progress has been noted in Brazil due to the improved economy. If you had a genuine, unbiased interest in Brazil, you could find these and other accomplishments of the government, which faces virtually insurmountable difficulty.

Your claim that Lula wants to make free speech a crime is a silly misrepresentation, which demonstrates your bias. I somehow doubt you are as critical of the Bush administration's assault on Free Speech in your own country. But by all means, offer your criticisms of other people's leaders. That’s in keeping with your arrogant attitude.

Criticizing the government’s purchase of a new jet is petty and comical. I am unaware of the purchase of a new Rolls Royce, a claim that appears apocryphal.

“I love Brazil, it's culture, people, food, etc... I just can't stand their government. Lula is weak and a fraud. Henrique was a much better President.” Well, that’s really a fact-laden set of assertions (I’M being sarcastic). Your words belie your first claim. You clearly have contempt for Brazil and Brazilians. You have no respect for them or their president. You can’t stand their government. Well, it’s really none of your business. Brazilians don’t care what you have to say about it. Your claim that Lula is weak and a fraud is an expression of nothing but your personal feelings about Lula, which is uninformed. You offer no support for your last claim that “Henrique was a much better President.” I can only conclude that it is equally uninformed.

“I'm open to criticism... but the hate and anger you write without backing it up.. doesn't do anyone good!” Your response to the prior post demonstrates that you are not open to criticism. Moreover your characterization of what I wrote as “hate and anger” is clearly erroneous. Was it the fact that I challenged your beliefs or was it my criticism of the US that you considered “hate and anger”? In any event, you are wrong. My views were expressed calmly and without any hatred or anger, whatsoever. I just don’t respect your ignorance, your arrogance, and your disrespect for “Brazil and other countries.” I don’t respect your ignorance about your own country’s bellicose, arrogant, and disrespectful policies. “It doesn’t do anyone any good.”

Now, I don’t purport to tell Brazilians what to do or how to think. And you can think however you wish, though I find your views misinformed and in some instances odious. But again, you purported to tell Brazilians how to think. So, I ask you again to answer the question, What standing do you have to tell Brazilians what to do and what to think?
Ignorant Dude
written by Guest, May 29, 2005
Don't you get it? Ignorant Dude doesn't want to hear anything bad about the US. Noooo, don't paste an article about the US! He wants to stay ignorant. He doesn't want to hear anything good about Brazil. He just wants to talk trash about Brazil. He just wants YOU to focus on YOUR problems. HE just wants to focus on YOUR problems.
oi gente!
written by Guest, May 29, 2005
I find it quite hilarious that the only english speaking country present at the Latin American forum in Brasilia was Guyana and then the U.S. got it's panties in a wad when it wasn't invited so that it run the show and piss off Latin American and Arab countries.
Ignorant... enough said.
written by Guest, May 30, 2005
"Do you realize that Brazil has the highest murder rate than any other country in the world. More Brazilians are murdered each day than Iraqies and Americans have died since the beginning of the war... what is Lula doing about that?? Nothing... If you are comparing Bush to Hilter... then words can't describe what Lula is!"

I'm from Brazil, born and raised there I know more about the country than you to say that to be precise.. Brazil is ranked 159 in highest death rate in the world with Botswana being the highest. Gather more information before you decide to misinform readers about Brazil.
I\'m American So I know
written by Guest, May 30, 2005
America is a hypocritical country that spouts democracy and freedom for all but it's a load of crock. America is a country of contradictions controlled by white supremacist right wing Christian nuts who are more violent and deadly than all extremist fundamentalist Muslims combined.

Yes there are a few good apples in the bunch but for the most part America is the world's leader in shyt stirring along with a few cronies. America is totally profit driven and capitalistic and money is the god worshipped in this country and the stock market is it's place of worship.

Iraq is the latest casualty of America's greed and ruthlessness. America has the highest murder rate in the world if you count all of the casualties from her dropping bombs on any and everyone who does not bow down and do her bidding.

America creates and controls all of the world's markets and she is determined that only America profits. The Third World (and many working class Americans) provide the free and nearly free slave labor that fuels her death and war machines. President Aristide of Haiti got the boot when he decided to crack down on sweatshop labor and started building schools in Haiti.

Mexicans illegally cross the borders every day and flee to America because huge multinationls buy up all of the land forcing the peasants to flee to America or starve.

America is the biggest death merchant on planet earth. Her form of "democracy" is a big fat joke. You have just as many poor homeless people in America as you do in any Third World country and many who have no health care or the type of profit driven health insurance that the insured have which means that if it is cheaper to cut off your head to cure a headache than give you an aspirin then that's what they'll do.

Say what you will. America has her hands in everybody's business and if the citizens of other countries are killing each other it is because America is holding their governments back from fully caring for their people because they want free and cheap sweatshop labor and woe to the union organizers that stand in the way of her almighty profits.
helLo
written by Guest, May 30, 2005
THE WORLD and the US is rulled big big companies and rich people. The fact is that Bush is not really president. Bush just a puppet for the rich. So is the CIA. The rich own both and if one doesn't listen; bang he's dead.
helLo again
written by Guest, May 30, 2005
All the wealth that America gained was through lies, stealing, slavery, and killing.
For Example:
The Sanish-American war was actually The Cuban War for Freedom from the Spanish. Cuba asked the US for help, but they came right when Cuba was winning their revolution. Before Cuba asked for help, Cuba told them not to take over the country after the war. And so the US made an amendment that said The US will NOT take over Cuba, and that they are only coming to help.
After the Cuba gained freedom the US marched all over taking credit for a Cuban win.
After 2 weeks of Cuban independance the US took over. their amendmet was a lie. The US also wrote an amentment that gave themselves the right to take over Cuba and it's reasources.
Fidel Castro later freed Cuba and kicked all the mafia, gambling, and prostitution out. All that stuff is now in Las Vegas. That's why we can't go to Cuba. The US is pissed they lost it and not because of communism. Cuba actually is one of the best places to live in the world. Castro did a good job with Cuba.
Dude.. its\' your favorite American agai
written by Guest, May 31, 2005
First:I quoted murder rate or homocide.. not death rate...

Second: Look we can all cut and past "information" from articles we find on the internet that will support all our views and then some...

Third: Hypocrite? I, as an American, should not voice my opion on Brazil? But you as an "American" is somehow nominated as their spokeman so long as your criticism is positive?

Forth: So when the US goes into countries to give aid. The US are "imperialists" or have a hidden agenda... But if a country like Brazil goes into a country like Haiti to give aid. It's for the good of humanity?? I see...

As I said, I love the country of Brazil. I have concerns because.. even though I am an American... I large part of my family is Brazilian. Public schools (or than state run universities) are poorly funded and continue to be. I agree Lula has made improvements from a foreign policy perspective... but still has much work to address Brazil's demestic issues.

Let's see... I'm arrogant, ignorant, an idiot, etc... I'm sure I left some things of the list... please do you have to belittle? or resort to name calling ? just because I don't think like you?? or have a different opinion??
Favorite Dude
written by Guest, June 01, 2005
Well, my fellow American, you stated, "Brazil and other countries need to focus on their own problems and stop focusing on the US. Bush . . ." Everything that followed from my side was in response to that, including the part that was pasted from an article about the crimes of our nations leaders. You have yet to counter a single point.

Now, I didn't appoint myself a defender of anyone, and you know it. You both told Brazil and the WORLD that they should not concern themselves with the US's role in the world and that Lula is "weak and a fraud." I simply have pointed out that you are wrong, very wrong.

Again, you are being deliberately obtuse, I think. People do not object to US aid. Please, you know that's not the problem, and if you don't…well, I'll restrain my use of any adjectives that, though accurate, might offend your sensibilities. But, here's an interesting point about even peaceful aid. (Apologies for pasting from another of my posts elsewhere.) Brazil refused some $40 million in aid for AIDS from the US because the US placed ridiculous conditions on the money. "Under the Bush administration policy, even groups whose HIV/AIDS work in other countries has nothing to do with commercial sex workers have to make a written pledge opposing commercial sex work or risk losing federal funding. In addition, the Bush administration might refuse to fund HIV/AIDS groups that do not accept Bush's social agenda on issues such as sexual abstinence and drug use." Brazil's policy is a model for combating HIV/AIDS, having practical policies toward commercial sex workers, injection drug users, men who have sex with men and other "high-risk" groups. Brazil's national AIDS program includes HIV/AIDS prevention, care and treatment services. The program manufactures and distributes generic versions of antiretroviral drugs, providing them at no cost to all HIV-positive people in the country. Although Brazil's HIV/AIDS prevention strategy emphasizes abstinence and sexual fidelity, it focuses more on condom education and distribution. Experts in 1992 estimated that 1.2 million HIV-positive people would live in Brazil by 2002, but the country's epidemic has been far less serious because of its prevention efforts, and by 2002 there were only about 660,000 HIV-positive people in the country.

Now, why is it that even in the area of humanitarian aid the US has to impose Bush's morality on poor countries? It is a f**king travesty. It's diabolical.

Further, you probably are not aware because the government was so effective in quashing debate over it and the media in the US were more than compliant, but it is a fact that the US spends much less per capita on foreign aid than do other developed nations. The US, while giving more total dollars, gives less per capita. That makes the US relatively very stingy. So I would ask you, my fellow American, to a) encourage our government to provide more aid worldwide and b) not to impose morals-laden conditions on such aid. The US could be revered for generosity. It could spread democracy by example. It could win the war of ideology by simply succeeding.

As for other activities in the world that are draining the nations coffers, making a mockery of human rights, and destroying our rep**ation even further, e.g., the war in Iraq and the war against terror, in which the US has participated in human rights violations and has shown the path to other nations to commit human rights violations, I would ask that you participate in an effort to stop such activities. In other words, be a trifle more concerned about YOUR country, rather than offering uninformed advice about the politics of a country where you do not even vote. Practice what you preach.

By the way, the word idiot comes up only in your last post. I will agree that I referred to your views as uninformed, arrogant, and ignorant. I'm sorry, is there a gentler way of describing those observations? Frankly, in re-reading my contributions, I believe any person would find them to be civil. Your appeal to civility (pity) rings hollow.

I'll end with a restatement of my original point: Brazilians ARE focusing on their problems. Now, focus on YOURS.
jd
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
some of you are so wrong. voting is the biggest scam ever. Look at the US, we have MIT and can put a man on the moon but we can't count high enough to count all the votes correctly? They don't count the votes. Why do we have an electorial college? Everyone votes, then that info goes before the board, they may look at it, but most likely not, and then they make the decision. By letting the people think they have a say keeps the dogs at bay. If we truely were a democracy we would have direct elections in which the popular vote decides who is president. Until this time comes, we will remain a demockary. Also Brazilians need to stop complaining, they are for the most part they are slow lazy people. The first thing they need to do is try getting somewhere on time.
jd
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
the US is a joke, ask americans if they believe in the death penalty and then assk how many are christians. Talk about bigots. Many americans speak out against abortion and genetic engineering because of christian values but have no problem fighting wars and killing grown humans
JD Jd jd...Favorite Dude here!!
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
You're whining about something that happened 2 presidential elections ago... in 2000? Come on .. get over it. I suggest you look into what the electoral college is all about... and why it was created.. it is quite cleaver and granted there are flaws has worked.

Brazilians are NOT lazy. That I can tell you from my personel experiences. They are actually the exact opposite. I certainly know of quite a few lazy Americans.
Re: Favorite Dude
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
Well I think we are finally getting closer to agreeing on some things. I agree... I may have been out of line telling "Brazil and other countries need to focus on their own problems and stop focusing on the US. Bush . . ." . This comment was made mainly out of frustration. It is my experience where ever you travel in the World, everyone has a strong opinion about the USA and in more times than not it is unfavorable. And in most cases these people get their info from local media sources which is usually bias.. and they never get to see it from a different perspective. Also, in most cases, they have never traveled to the US or if they have its been to Miami and Orlando.

Now...I'm glad we agree that the Aid given by any Nation is a good thing. Where I disagree with you here is the US or which ever Nation giving, have the right to impose conditions or terms if the aid is accepted. Whether or not these conditions are based on morals or not it shouldn't matter. Now Brazil or any Nation offered aid, also has the right to refuse aid if they cannot agree to the terms. Unfortunately, while the US and Brazil (using your example) cannot/did not come to terms for this aid. Many Brazilians continue to die from HIV/AIDS.

I'm still in disagreement with you in reference to the Brazilian government and their lack of focus. Although, I agree that Brazilians (the people are focused). They proved this by electing Lula for all the issues he stood for and promised. But my opinion remains... Lula is a fraud and just another politician with empty promises... he has done almost nothing to address domestic issues like education.
jd
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
ok, brazilians are not lazy,cariocas are; the majority of my time has been spent in rio, yes the piranhas are always on the job, however, if you travel beyond the copa, baha, recreio, and head over the mountains into campo grande and santa cruz you will see another side of rio. I understand that a multitude of social issues and inequities have created the current situation. Also, for all of you who write in, if you have never been to brazil, you have no idea what you are talking about because your american biases and attitude will distort the entire picture. Most americans think brazil is 3rd world mexico. the american media and government is not going to promote the superior brazilian culture. within a few years the US will have to contend with the problems brazil is facing now. also, this stuff about piracy, yeah right, good luck on trying to stop it china and russia are even worse. these are just some ramblings from a crazy person but I do spend three months out of the year in santa cruz do rio and the surrounding favelas and feel that I have had a look at both sides of rio. word to the wise, don't speak english or any portuguese on the combine or pegasu II out to the westside
AIDS aid
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
You misunderstand. The US has the right to impose conditions, that's true enough. I just think it's wrong to do. I think it's odious. I think it's arrogant. I find it less than benevolent. The Lula administration was correct to tell the US to shove its aid up the collective ass of the US.

As for the consequences of that decision, you again display arrogance and ignorance. Arrogance in saying that they will and should suffer becuase of refusing the aid. Ignorance because you continue to refuse to acknowledge that Brazil's AIDS policy is extremely effective and is seen as a model for the rest of the world. Nonetheless, if you were correct in saying "many Brazilians will continue to die from HIV/AIDS" because of the refusal of the money, that further supports my position that the conditions imposed by the US are completely cruel and egregious.
...
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
Before you cry foul…no, you didn't say they "should suffer." That they somehow deserve to suffer becuase of the decision to refuse the aid (abeit within their rights to do so) was, however, implied.

Also, you don't understand that there was no negotiation of "terms." The aid was take-it-or-leave-it on the terms imposed by the US. The conditions were based on morals, and that does matter. Just like you, the US believes that if you don't agree with Bush's morals, you deserve to suffer (don't deserve the aid). How you cannot see that such an attitude is egregious is beyond my belief.
...
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
The hypocrisy of George Bush is just as egregious. For a person who claims to be a "What would Jesus do?" kind of guy, he certainly fails that test on this one.
Bush and Religion
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
White House Press Briefing with Scott McClellan
Tuesday, February 1, 2005 12:15 PM
by Russell Mokhiber

Mokhiber: Scott, last night, in an amicus brief filed before the U.S. Supreme Court, the Justice Department came down in favor of displaying the Ten Commandments at courthouses and statehouses around the country. My question is - does the President believe in Commandment Number Six - thou shalt not kill - as it applies to the U.S. invasion of Iraq?

Scott McLellan: Go ahead, next question.

White House Press Briefing with Scott McClellan
Monday, December 6, 2004 - 1:00 pm
by Russell Mokhiber

Mokhiber: Scott, on the Middle East - many evangelical Christians in the United States are supporting right-wing Jews in Israel who want to rebuild the temple on the Temple Mount in Jerusalem. They (Evangelical Christians) believe this is a prerequisite for Christ's return to earth.

They believe that when Christ returns to earth - they call this the rapture - he will take back with him the true believers. And the rest - the non believers - Jews, Muslims - will be left behind to face a violent death here on earth.

My question is, as a born again Christian, does the President support efforts to rebuild the temple on the Temple Mount?

Scott McLellan: Russ, we can sit here and talk about religious issues. I will be glad to take your question, and if there is more, I will get back to you on that.

Mokhiber: Is he a born again Christian?

Scott McLellan: Thank you. (McLellan abruptly ends the press briefing and walks out.)
...
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
Shhhh! Don't talk about it. Just use coded language (a strategy Bush has spoken of himself).
Last words on this article from Favorite
written by Guest, June 02, 2005
I guess it would have been best if the USA just never offered the aid to begin with.

Take your advise... that money should be kept in the USA to focus on US problems...

Damned if you do... damned if you don't...

Terms can be negotiated. Everything is negotiable!

I give up
written by Guest, June 03, 2005
Yes, poor downtrodden US…damned if it does, damned if it doesn't. You're so right.

Actually, you completely missed the "advice," which is becoming less surprising the more you write. From the quality of your last post, I think you're just trolling at this point. It's either that or you are genuinely obtuse. Frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn.
jd
written by Guest, June 03, 2005
religion was simply created by man to cope with the anxiety of the unknown afterlife. it is too bad that politicians have used it to keep the uneducated in check. listen up americans, if your rich, and I mean over 300,000 a year, vote republican, if you make less than this vote democrat. if you are a humanbeing and cocerned about people vote democrat. the US government has become a tool / government for big business. government by big business for big business. voodoo economics does not work, the rich get richer and the poor get poorer. there is no trickle down effect. basically, for the majority of americans if you vote republican you are shooting yourself in the foot. all you need to do is go back and look at the effects of republican legislation on american society. wars, tax breaks for the rich, debt, zero cash for social programs. Why doesn't the US have a flat tax for all? because if we give money to schools and educate people those in power will not be there very long
AMAZING!!!
written by Guest, June 21, 2005
Pretty amazing, Clara. Congrats! I don't see this ability to write between the lines very often these days. Brazil Update's power lies between very well written lines and it's amazing how much it arose in people-- controversial feelings, anger, polemic, a desire to comunicate and exchange passionate viewpoints. So much has been brought about by Clara's column. This is quite impressing. I love the whole thing, the writing and what it generated.
Writer On the Prowl
written by Guest, June 26, 2005
On America an Visas: Ms. Porto's insightful commentary captures much of what is wrong with the American public image (and notice I say the image, rather than the country). The government, which is not the true America but rather a colleection of the economically elite or the representitives of that elite--men and women, for the most part, of the most mediocre intellect, behaves in a heavy-handed, arrogant manner that never takes into account the long view. Witness the witless occupation of Iraq which has exposed for the entire world the flaws in our military, flaws that can be exploited by a clever enemy.

Our govenement forgets that we do not own our natural resources and the other advantages that made this country powerful, we are merely custodians over them and they should be shared with the rest of the world. When we refuse to extend the hand of friendship to those who live beyond our borders and clearly offer no threat to us, we make enemies at a time when we need all the allies we can find. The arbitrary rejection of this woman's visa is part of throughline of behavior that hurts our country. Ms. Porto has uncovered an issue that goes far beyond just the Olympics or this one episode. She is to be commended.

abn amro/tokio marine scandal
written by RUBENS SANCHES PROENÇA, September 22, 2007
ABN/ TOKIO MARINE THE NEW SCANDAL

I ask all who represent the company to protest along with the Tokio Marine directors.

The company has been maintaining a non respective practice with the iauto insurance clients. Read the scandal that includes september 2007 accusations from newspapers, life threats, irregular reports and cruelty against human rigths.

In English see the case at website,



WWW.INSEGURO.COM.BR



The brazilian peopple wants to know:

Where is the Millea Group code of Conduct ? Where is the Respect for Human Rights and Dignity ?

WERE IS KUNIO ISHIHARA ? WHERE IS THE NEW MILLEA PRESIDENT MISTER SHUZO SAMI ?

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack