Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083607

Who's Online

We have 579 guests online



World's Biggest Clinical Stem Cell Research in Brazil Jeopardized by Legal Appeal PDF Print E-mail
2005 - June 2005
Written by Marina Lemle   
Wednesday, 15 June 2005 11:07

{mosimage}A row has broken out between Brazil's most senior law official and its health minister about the legality of using human embryos for stem cell research.

According to the attorney general, Claudio Fonteles, using human embryos is "unconstitutional" because it infringes upon the right to life, and so should be banned.

On May 30, Fonteles appealed to the Supreme Court to repeal article five of the 'biosecurity law', which allows scientists to use human embryonic stem cells for research and to treat diseases. The law was approved in March 

Health minister Humberto Costa called Fonteles's move a "backward step" that would deprive Brazilian researchers of the opportunity to seek cures for a wide range of diseases.

The dispute hinges on different definitions of when a human life begins.

The World Health Organization says life does not begin until the embryo produced by the fertilization of an egg by a sperm attaches itself to the mother's womb. Fonteles, however, argues that life begins at fertilization.

Allowing researchers to extract stem cells from fertilized eggs, a process that leads to their destruction, infringes upon the right to life and therefore breaches Brazil's constitution, he says.

Fonteles argues that instead of obtaining stem cells from fertilized eggs, Brazilian researchers should get them from umbilical cords or adults.

However, stem cells obtained from fertilized eggs are believed to have more potential than those taken from adults or umbilical cords.

Yesterday, the health ministry sent a report to Brazil's General Law Office outlining its technical arguments in response to Fonteles's position.

It says article five cannot be unconstitutional because the constitution only addresses rights of people who have been born, and that Brazil's civil and criminal laws refer only to embryos fixed in the womb.

Fonteles's appeal to the Supreme Court includes supporting statements made in the past by nine scientists, who all agree that life begins after fertilization.

For instance, Claudia Batista, a researcher at the Rio de Janeiro Federal University with experience in stem cell research, says, "After fertilization, there is a human being in full development, and not just a cell complex with merely cell life."

"Life begins at fertilization. Any artificial method to destroy it is murder," said late Jérôme Lejeune, who in 1959 discovered the genetic basis for Down's syndrome and was an internationally renowned advocate of unborn children's rights.

Gynaecologist Denirval da Silva Brandão says that after fertilization there is a new independent human being, with its own genetic makeup and immune system. "This is not a metaphysical hypothesis, it is an experimental finding."

But health minister Humberto Costa calls Fonteles's appeal "a backward step", adding that "stem cell research is a huge door that is being opened for the future of our country in the treatment of many diseases".

If Fonteles's appeal is granted, the world's biggest clinical study of a stem cell therapy for heart disease, involving 33 institutions and 1,200 patients in nine Brazilian states, could be jeopardized. The trial was launched last week.

Antônio Carlos Campos de Carvalho, chief of research at the National Cardiology Institute, says that if the trial is successful, it could save 200,000 lives in three years and some 37 million reais (US$ 15.4 million) every month.

Brazil's health and science ministries plan to invest US$ 4.4 million on research using adult and embryonic stem cells. The funds will support basic laboratory research, pre-clinical studies using animals and clinical trials on people.

To support the government, Brazil's National Academy of Medicine will next month publish a document outlining ten key ethical recommendations and best practices.

Science and Development Network - www.scidev.net



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (15)Add Comment
Re: Stem Cells
written by Guest, June 15, 2005
Leave the unborn alone! Is there not anything that these madd scientists
wont disect and defile!

Scientists want fame and fortune now at the expense of innocent lives! Shameful!

Why dont you scientists experiment on yourselves so that we can all be rid of you!

...
written by Guest, June 15, 2005
f**k you, Christian nut! What's shameful is your goddamn ignorance, you cunt.
Stem cells
written by Guest, June 16, 2005
Not all theologies and ethics agree on the beginning of life.
Some ancient Jewish sages, for example, say that a fetus
does not become a human being until after it is born.
There is no reason why, according to this belief, that
stem cells should not be used for research. It is possible
to be fervently religious and still advocate stem cell research.
No one religion has a monopoly on truth. Those who want
stem cell research have a righ to their own beliefs. Let the Christian
extremists reject cures based on stem cell research and die happy.
Definition
written by Guest, June 16, 2005
Christian: One who believes life begins at conception and ends at birth.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2005
Moron: One who turns 21 and acts like he's still 12.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2005
Simpleton: One who hates Christians.
Re: F-You
written by Guest, June 17, 2005
I know about the advantages of stem cell research, and its potential for curing deseases.

However, not at the expense of a potential human being that if allowed to live, COULD BE THE ONE WHO DEVELOPS THE CURE THAT YOU ARE KILLING HIM TO FIND!
f**k YOU ALL OVER AGAIN
written by Guest, June 17, 2005
I don't hate Christians, I just have no respect for anyone who believes in such fairy tales. Talk about a simpleton who acts like he's 12. You people are completely depraved and you're trying to f**k up the rest of the world with your goddamn supersitions. And then you give us this holier than thou, pious bulls**t act. Again, f**k YOU! That's spelled F-U-C-K! A perfectly good word that expressed my sentiments perfectly about a perferctly ignorant, deluded, demented Christian dim wit.
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2005
If you Christians just would practice you ignorant superstitions quietly and leave the rest of us alone to make progress in the world we'd all appreciate it. But, no. We've got you and guys like Bush, DeLay, Santorum, Frist, etc. pushing their f**ked up beliefs on the world and starting a new crusade against Islam (another bunch of deluded f**k-ups). You religious fanatics are going to be the death of us all. Why can't you just f**k-off?
...
written by Guest, June 17, 2005
Of snowflakes and flakes
written by Guest, June 18, 2005
The new word in the US that we're hearing is "snowflake." Although that word is used by Christians who find all potential life sacred and all actual life sinful and dirty (especially if you're a follower of Islam or other non-Christian religion or, gasp, and atheist) in order to give personality to a bunch of cells, it's an apt term in that it describes just how insubstantial the "life" of the "snowflake" acutally is.
...
written by Guest, June 19, 2005
Kinda funny that these same Christians, those that cherish life so much, are the first to cheer, raw and praise the death penalty. Actually, don't they shoot doctors who perform abortions for a hobby?
...
written by Guest, June 20, 2005
These Christian nuts are "adopting" embryos! They've gone completely bonkers. Next thing you know they'll be adopting tampons, panty liners, and discarded sperm.
Help
written by Guest, July 20, 2005
I rather think you gentlemen need immediate help. Expletives and rants are both futile and pointless. Denigrating Christians (many of whom have conflicting views about life) simply because they are Christians shows a lack of understanding of society or any sort of integration with same.
Surplus eggs
written by Guest, July 23, 2005
Human eggs preserved for possible artificial insemination but
later slated for discard as surplus are not potential human beings. They
are not to be used in any attempt to create human beings; they
will be washed down the drain. Why is it not possible to make
these surplus eggs serve the health of existing humans? Stem
cell research does not destroy potential human beings. There
are three billion living humans who can benefit from stem cell research.
A microscopic egg is not possessed of a soul. Billions of such eggs are
produced each month in human females and most are "discarded,"
if y ou will, by failing to receive sperm. Should be try to capture
each woman's eggs each month and fertilize them so we won't lose
the potential human beings? This line of thought is crazy. The issue
here is not Christian, Jewish, Muslim, or any religion. This is a matter
for science, not for prists, mullashs, and rabbis to decide. Theologians
are not competent to guide science. They tried it wilth Galileo and made
utter fools of themselves. The infallible popes have had to admit they
were wrong; the earth orbits the sun. They are wrong again about
stem cell research and equally foolish.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack