Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083516

Who's Online

We have 676 guests online



How Lula's Woes Are Playing into Washington's Hands PDF Print E-mail
2005 - August 2005
Written by Sara Evans   
Monday, 01 August 2005 11:15

Poster of Brazil's President Lula kissed by fansMushrooming allegations of bribery in President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's administration are part of a wave of corruption charges sweeping through the Brazilian government. The accusations are sapping Lula's personal reputation, as well as the spirit of Brazilian democracy.

Thus, Washington is likely to find it markedly easier to rein in Brazilian defiance in the areas of economic integration, oil policy and Lula's friendship with Venezuela's Chávez.

The U.S. is also less likely to tolerate Brazil's leadership of regional economic and political initiatives that do not resonate with those of the U.S.

In order to ensure his reelection, Lula must defend his reputation by proving that the legislature's investigative probes have found their marks when their deliberations conclude.

However, he must also push through a number of economic and social reforms to award his original constituency - the poor - from whom he is seen to have strayed. There will not be enough time in the current legislative session to do both; Lula must pick his poison.

On July 27th, an investigative committee of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies called for the arrest of publicity agent Marcus Valério de Souza. De Souza was implicated in the growing corruption scandals assaulting President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva's government, specifically his left-leaning Worker's Party (PT).

The source of many of the allegations is Congressman Roberto Jefferson, head of the Labor Party (PTB), whose testimony before the legislature's Ethics Committee directly accused Souza, along with Lula's former chief of staff José Dirceu, former PT leader José Genoíno and former PT treasurer Delúbio Soares of participating in a scheme to collect at least US$ 12,000 in bribes from private companies on a regular basis.

This money was then distributed monthly to individual members of the Progressive Party (PP) and the Liberal Party (PL) in return for their support of the PT's legislative initiatives.

Dirceu, Genoíno, and Soares have since resigned in separate attempts to protect Lula from the splattering mud. Despite his lame assertions that, since assuming the presidency, he "no longer took part" in the PT's operation, Lula is at the helm of an administration that is rapidly losing its reputation for probity and honesty.

Payback?

Vote-buying schemes are not the only instances of alleged corruption in the upper tiers of the Brazilian government, and Jefferson's accusations may have been motivated partially by vengeance.

On May 14, at the beginning of the recent raft of investigations, the national Brazilian weekly news magazine Veja published a report accusing Jefferson, a federal deputy in charge of a number of state companies, of overseeing an embezzlement scheme involving the Correios, the Brazilian national post office, in which he demanded donations for the PTB from.

Jefferson's PTB had been a longstanding congressional ally of Lula's PT until the latter called for an investigation into Jefferson's alleged wrongdoing on May 19. Soon after, Jefferson came out with his vote-buying allegations against his former legislative allies.

These latest charges against Jefferson are not surprising in light of allegations last year that the congressman demanded US$ 180,000 monthly from the PT in return for his legislative support; Jefferson appears to have been an active participant in the very scheme he is now exposing.

Damage Control

In response to the allegations, which help constitute the most flagrant political scandal since Lula came to power in 2003, the President has reshuffled his cabinet. Lula's new Chief of Staff assumed his post on June 16, and further changes occurred on July 6 as the ministers for telecommunications, health, and energy and mines were replaced by members of the centrist Democratic Movement Party (PMDB).

On July 8, a new minister of labor was appointed, and on July 12, the new ministers of education and science and technology took over. Finally, on July 21, the towns and social security ministries received new leaders.

Lately, the PT won control of the parliamentary investigative commission (CPI) set up by the legislature to probe the post office allegations involving Jefferson. Lula will need to make absolutely certain the committee's findings are authentic and credible.

Domestic Popularity Remains High

Lula has been revered as a genuine people's reformer since his election in 2003. His Zero Hunger Program and other social initiatives have contributed to his domestic popularity; a recent poll by the DataFolha Institute indicates that, if presidential elections were held today, Lula would win easily.

Sam Logan of the InfoAmericas group ascribes the President's appeal to a perception that he has "a desire to fight for Brazil's poor." Since Lula's inauguration, fiscally conservative policies have kept the country's economy growing, providing new funding for the President's ambitious social programs and keeping Brazil attractive to international investors.

As the Brazilian stock market has been demonstrated, its daily tally and the value of the currency rides on day-to-day developments in the corruption investigation.

Latin American Ties

Since his election, Lula has been a strong proponent of political and economic integration among Latin American nations. Brazil is a leader of Mercosur, the Southern Cone's free trade bloc that also includes Paraguay, Uruguay and Argentina as well as a number of associate members.

Lula also demonstrated strong support for the December launch of the South American Community of Nations project, which aims to integrate Mercosur and the Andean Community into a continent-wide free trade area.

Concurrently, Lula has been pursuing closer ties with Venezuela's Hugo Chávez and Argentina's Nestor Kirchner. The three leaders held a summit on May 11 in Brazil to discuss the formation of Petrosur, a regional oil company that would integrate the state-controlled companies of Petrobras, PDVSA and Enarsa.

In addition, Lula and Chávez have signed a number of trade agreements that are predicted to increase bilateral trade between the two nations from US$ 1.6 billion in 2004 to US$ 3 billion in 2005, according to a Latinnews interview with Fernando Portela, president of the Venezuela-Brazil Chamber of Commerce.

Behind these regional negotiations seems to lie a challenge to U.S. hegemony in the region. Chávez has openly challenged U.S. "imperialism" in the region, threatened to cut off Venezuelan oil supplies, and allied himself with longtime U.S. enemy Fidel Castro.

Chávez thrives in his new role as Latin America's uncrowned firebrand. The outspoken President represents the radical wing of the region's shift to the left, while Lula has been seen as a moderating influence.

The Brazilian president occasionally has been called on to act as a middleman to persuade Chávez to abandon stances that Washington views as belligerent and radical.

On the other hand, he also has defended Chávez's inflammatory rhetoric against U.S. critics, observing at a summit in late March that "Venezuela has the right to remain a sovereign nation and to make its own decisions."

This kind of defense, along with sales of Brazilian arms to his wayward ally, has added to Washington's regional anxieties. It would seem that Lula has been walking a tightrope between affirming regional solidarity and placating the U.S.

Now, however, in light of the corruption allegations, Lula's own credibility is at stake, and the U.S. may find it easier to defuse his challenge to U.S. regional hegemony.

Washington's Unease

As the U.S. endeavors to promote the linkage between free trade and democracy around the globe, the potential for political instability in Brazil adds to Washington's list of anxieties over what is happening in the region.

Lula's friendship with Chávez and support for regional economic initiatives as alternatives to the Free Trade Agreement of the Americas (FTAA) have created rifts in Brazil's ties with Washington.

Rampant corruption in the Lula administration not only threatens democracy's good name in Brazil, but adds to the country's list of transgressions, including financial misdeeds, environmental lapses and mistreatment of its aboriginal population.

International Ambitions

Lula's mid-July visit to Paris for Bastille Day highlighted growing ties between the two countries. France is currently supporting Brazil's bid for a permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council, and the South American behemoth could be poised to make an explosive entrance onto the international stage.

In pursuance of this goal, Brazil took on the leadership of the UN peacekeeping force attached to the UN Stabilization Mission in Haiti (MINUSTAH) in June 2004. Brazil is the largest contributor of troops to the now controversial mission, and has acquired a reputation for countenancing the perpetration of atrocities against Haitian civilians by the soldiers under its command, simply because these Haitians support the overthrown leader, Jean-Bertrand Aristide.

The latest installment of violence was on July 6, 2005, when MINUSTAH troops commanded by Brazil lurched out of control and proceeded to massacre 23 Haitians in Port-au-Prince's Cité Soleil neighborhood.

Lula's Quandary

Unfortunately for Lula, a June DataFolha poll showed that 77 percent of the Brazilian public believes that Lula is at least partially responsible for the recent corruption scandals, and the perception of his personal guilt can only increase as the allegations multiply.

However, another recent poll by Instituto Sensus shows the President's personal approval rating stands at 60 percent. In order to salvage the PT's credibility with the population, which has shown volatile opinion swings over the issue, the investigation of the corruption cases will have to occupy a good deal of the legislature's time in the coming months.

According to Jonathan Wheatley of Business Week, this means that "Lula would likely have to shelve plans to reform rigid labor laws, overhaul a dysfunctional judiciary, and streamline a bewildering tax system."

Though government officials have begun negotiating a "governability pact" that would determine the agenda of the legislature and guarantee that important reform legislation would receive a hearing in the chamber of deputies, it is doubtful that the competing demands of reform and investigation can be effectively managed by an already divided government.

The reforms, which are essential to Lula's legislative agenda and his prospects of regaining political equilibrium, must be passed if he is to ensure his popularity before the upcoming election.

The popular president seems to find himself precariously situated between the horns of an intractable dilemma: only by completing both the investigations and the reforms can he maintain his high approval ratings, but due to time constraints, one of these initiatives will probably fall by the wayside.

As much as he attempts to distance himself from his floundering PT, Lula must stand by the party he helped create during its great travails, or risk being accused of opportunism and cynicism.

For More Information:

"Argentina, Brazil, Venezuela agree on setting up Petrosur." Invertia. 11 May 2005.

"Argentine, Brazilian, Venezuelan leaders ratify strategic alliance in Brasilia." BBC Monitoring International Reports. 10 May 2005.

"Brazilian stocks rise again, reversing declines on corruption scandal," The AP. 13 June 2005

"Brazil: Lula allies back corruption probe." UPI. 19 May 2005.

"Brazil: Lula distances himself from PT." Latinnews Daily. 18 July 2005.

"Brazil unable to get Chavez to revise decision on U.S. accord." Agência Estado. 28 April 2005.

"Brazil vote-buying allegations denied," CNN.com. June 12 2005.

"Corruption scandal damaging Brazil's Lula." Agência Estado. 24 June 2005.

"Following the money trail." The Economist. 16 July 2005.

Gentile, Carmen J. "Summit: Lula defends Venezuela from U.S." 29 March 2005.

"Government to control CPI." Latinnews Daily. 16 June 2005.

"Jefferson repeats corruption accusations." Latinnews Daily. 13 June 2005.

"Lula and Chavez talk up regional integration." Latinnews Daily. 15 February 2005.

"Lula hit as top aide quits over bribes." UPI. 19 May 2005.

"Lula to kickstart a cabinet reshuffle." Latinnews Daily. June 13 2005.

Lyra, Paulo de Tarso. "Political leaders in Brazil begin talks in search of a governability pact." Gazeta Mercantil. 27 July 2005.

"Private sector linked to scandal?" the AP. 13 June 2005.

"PT and PSDB turn investigations into electoral fight." Latinnews Daily. 28 July 2005.

"Reshuffle at last." Brazil Report. 26 July 2005.

This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associate Sara Evans.

The Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA) - www.coha.org - is a think tank established in 1975 to discuss and promote inter-American relationship. Email: coha@coha.org.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (89)Add Comment
This is bad news for the Revolution
written by Guest, August 01, 2005
Chavez and Lula do not need this corrution tainting the Peoples Revolution. I'm sure it was the evil American Capitalists who tempted and set up the good-in-their-hearts Workers Party officials. They are just human....are they not? Surely the blame must fall squarely on the large corporate American interests pulling strings just under the surface.

I hope Lula can call off the election if it's going to be close and restore integrity for the brave Brasilian people. Chavez will likely be doing that too. Dangerous sabre rattling from Washington call for stability in leadership in these two threatened lands.

Viva Chavez! Viva Lula!


I can smell a rat a mile away...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
smells like CIA crap again!
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Sure blame everything on the U.S. Am sure this is all fault on President Bush. When Latin America stops blaming other countries for its problems it will finally be a developed continent.
He is correct
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
The guy who posted the comments above is right on the top.

However, I dare to say, Brazil will be always underdeveloped because its ruling groups, particularly left-leaning intellectuals, will never stop to blame others for their own socio-economic and political failures.
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
This Lula crap sounds like a replay of the last 500 years. Does anybody take brasil seriously?
PT NAO SAO DIFERENTE, SAO LADROES TAMBEM
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
A ROUBALHEIRA TA' GRANDE. ATE' FILHO DO PRESIDENTE USANDO O AVIAO DA FAB COM AMIGUINHOS E NINGUEM DIZ NADA.
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
From Lula: "Venezuela has the right to remain a sovereign nation and to make its own decisions." That is exactly right, and Venezula is not Chavez and only Chavez - the Castro wannabe.

It is "One person, one vote" not "One person, one vote, one time."

Brazil, the next super power - right after France.
Hold on just a minute...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Not passing the blame...Brasilian politicians ought to be held responsible for their deeds and this time, they will. The Brasilian people said so!

However, I don't put anything pass the United States and the CIA. The Lula government has been less then desirable according to the thugs in Washington (i.e. Bush, the chimp). Having said that, I am willing to bet that part of the so called "mensalão" was funded by the undermining Washington cowboys.

If you think for a minute that the US is not involved in all politics of Latin America (particularly in Brasil), you are seriously mistaken!

Remeber, US hegemony in the region is an unrelenting long term plan.

Good day,

keol
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
“Having said that, I am willing to bet that part of the so called "mensalão" was funded by the undermining Washington cowboys.”

Why are we not surprised at Keol´s view?

Have you seen any black helicopters lately Keol? It’s rueful fools such as yourself – regretfully, you have many peers the world over – that are more detrimental to truth and democracy than those you critique. Your specious arguments and imaginative, if not crackbrained, theories only attract balmy minds and malleable uneducated sheep. Your “long live Osama” rant in the forum part of this site shows you for the delusional fool you are.

If upping your Prozac dosage doesn’t help with the voices in your head, try adjusting your tinfoil hat. Remember, the CIA is watching you through your computer, and they are coming for you muuhooohaahaaa.

Remember, Brazilian stupidity in the region is an unrelenting long term illness.

Good Day, right back at ya
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Why don't we just go ahead and make the countries of Mexico, and South America States.

Let's get it over with, otherwise the people will all end up in the USA.

Getting Personal Huh?
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Forget the Prozac bit...You need Viagara...for being such a closet american fruitcake! Your stupidity is a personal achievement which transcends national boundaries...

Luv Ya 2

Your Master,

keol

Long Live Osama...
Why are we not surprised at Keol´s view?
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Whoever wrote that typifies the inherent american perspective of freedom. Americans for the most part have no “justifiable arguments” hence they become evasive, personal and then, intimidating. That same approach projects over to their form of government (the Washington gangsters).

Democracy (freedom) so as long as they (americans) agree with you, otherwise, if they don’t like you or your point of view, they will patronize you, impose, infringe and consequently, alienate you! It’s in their blood.

NOW I ASK: Why are we not surprised with Americans’ views?

Good Day,

keol
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
How does anyone, ney, why WOULD anyone attempt to refute such a vacuous statement such as this gem below.

“I am willing to bet that part of the so called "mensalão" was funded by the undermining Washington cowboys.”

As your pathetically corrupt and infamously inept government bumbles through yet another chapter of typical banana republic politics, you see fit to stitch this scandal to the US? What a surprise. Now if this doesn’t smack of the archetypal pass-the-buck Brazilian mantra!

Purge on all you like about what you perceive to be in American´s blood, you’re only proving that your depth and breadth of any political issue is not just superficial, but simply retarded at best.

Still, one needs to wonder why someone would be so filled with distain for the US, when within their country´s very borders there are still slaves working in debt bondage, child labor, poverty, illiteracy and violence all at levels that make the dark ages look rather appealing?
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
I'm American and my hegemony (and most all Americans I know) consists of absolute control of a cold Brahma - or Skol. I really have a deep respect for the vast majority of Brazilians I meet. They are generally honest, decent, loving people in spite of the nations woes.

I personally would have no desire to raise a family in Brazil. I'm not sure I could do as well as many of my friends.

Americans have no strategic interest, actually hardly any interest, in Brazil. We can usually find it on a map, and have "heard about it" but little else. For my fellow countrymen, that is thier loss.

The talk of "resouces" is nonsense. The Mississippi is still used as a source of drinking water for cities all the way to the delta and that includes New Orleans. Farmland, water, coal, iron, natural gas, food, all still in abundance. Oil? Yep, that is a problem. But if you travel west through Texas and many other parts, there are hundreds of oil wells just sitting there capped off and waiting to be pumped. That is no joke. Economics and Congress have stalled that effort.

One other thing, many here consider support for Israel a sacred duty. That has been a major source of problems, but a burden worth bearing.

While we get hit occasionally, we usually dust ourselves off and get back at it. We make mistakes, we admit them globally for all to see, we argue, fuss, fight amongst oursleves, again for the world to see.

But what you do not see unless you visit is that inner strength and determination.

There are times where I feel that Brazil is growing up and I cheer. Then there are events and times where I feel the situation is hopeless. Strange, many of my Brazilian friends seem to echo those sentiments.

As always, I hope for the best. You are certainly due for a change.

Remember: hegemony - Proper control of Brahma, Skol, and Antartica!!

Did You Mention the Dark Ages?
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Dark Ages Huh? …hehehe

I am so glad you brought it up, it went like “…the dark ages look rather appealing? “ and some previous and post bla bla bla bla, and then some.

Well, my dear idiotic american supremacist penpal, am I ever glad you brought that subject up, the “Dark Ages” that is…

Quite candidly, the Dark Ages is upon us once again so as long as the chimp, GW Bush, sets with his paws at the control knob. You see, the chimp through his terrorism acts, has brought the worse on all of us out in the open.

The chimp invaded Iraq, the chimp invaded Afghanistan, the chimp is threatening Iran, Korea, Cuba, and even his former allies (Germany, France among others with economic pressures), whom will not back him up in his worldly conquests.

When you mentioned the “Dark Ages” immediately came to my mind as to, how many wars has your beloved United States of Amoeba being involved in since WWII, or indirect involvement. Too numerous to mention, don’t you agree?

The Dark Ages huh…which nation on planet Earth has released an “atomic device” over other countries? Those memories still in Japanese living memory, don’t you know!

But now, that same mad dog (the USA) wants to control who has them atomic babes….riiiight, it seems skewed fairness, don’t you agree my north american penpal?

You see, us Brasilians are welcome pretty much anywhere we go. On the other hand however, Americans are not welcomed anywhere, even Canada…unless of course, you post it as “American$ Are Welcome”, in which case I would have a tendency to agree with your IQ. Please don’t misunderstand me though, what I mean by your IQ is your “Ignorance Coefficient.” hehehe

Good Day,

keol

I\'m American and my hegemony...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Hey wait, you forgot to mention the "acid rain" as another american fresh water resource, right?


Also you said: "I personally would have no desire to raise a family in Brazil"...I didn't know that?

I thought every parents would try to raise thier kids away from child m******rs like the numerous ones in the USA.

I personally would have no desire to raise a family in the United States with those perverts, they usually abduct right from their bedrooms, sexually molest them and then, they kill them and sometimes alive, like the recent case in Tampa.

I am so glad I am not american...Thank you God!

keol
what a bunch of crooks.
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Put them in jail.
Lula and Democracy
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Nobody should despair. My country (Brazil) will learn sooner or latter the lessons of true democracy.

Now I disagree with the American above who mentioned the idea that the USA has no interest in Brazil. Why would your country invest so much money in Brazil? Do you have any idea on how much money is in Brazil from the US and the other countries? I actually do not think that it is a bad thing; in fact we do need investment and partnership with all the countries we can get. But no interest..please re-evaluate your statement.

I have hopes for Brazil and I believe that this political scandal we are going through now is actually beneficial. Democracy cannot exist without pain. All the dirt need to be exposed before we start cleaning our house; or would everyone prefer the status quo, the depraved out of sight situation? Naturally, the answer is no. This scandal is necessary like the pains of a woman in labor ready to give birth, and this case to true democracy which Brazil yet does not have.

Now the relatioship between Lula and this president of Venezuela or even Fidel Castro is more like a Banana republic type of thing, sadly. Castro and Chavez have nothing to offer to their people so why our president has so much sympathy for those guys? They exploit people in behalf of a privileged minority and let the corruption run like the waters of the mighty Amazon River. What can Lula learn from all that crap, honestly?






...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
“Quite candidly, the Dark Ages is upon us once again so as long as the chimp, GW Bush”

Fer starters there my synapse deficient little coconut cracker – you still live in the dark ages. How will “chimp Bush” change that for your current state of affairs? Brazil was a social wasteland of violence and corruption pre “the Bush Chimp” and will remain so regardless of whomever plants their ass in the West Wing.

Again, you brush aside the many ills that continue to fester within the country of “order and progress!?” and run right along with your usual and very tiresome tirade.

What this boteca educated sloth seems to be missing in all of this is that no one is defending the US. We’re just taking your irrelevant and often fraudulent paranoid ramblings to task. Such as: “I am willing to bet that part of the so called "mensalão" was funded by the undermining Washington cowboys.” (I still chuckle when I read this). I’m just waiting for Jose Dirceu to blather this out live on BandNews.

But you don’t see your own stupidity do you tutinho?
f**king evil gringoes destablizes brazil
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
all of this bribery scandal is nothing other than some evil gringo scheme to undermine the leftist lula regime in brazil, so that he gives in to US hegemony and no longer supports chavez!

typical imperialistic and racist gringos trying to destabilize brazil!!

these devil gringoes will end at nothing to undermine leftist and latin american unity to stand up to US bullying, plunder, pillage, and coup-mongering against leftist and socialist and people-loving regimes of latin america.
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
Keol,

Again, all of our imperfections are there for you to see. As you enjoy pointing out. Not so everywhere else.

Acid rain is not a serious problem. Not even close. It was a media darling for a time, but they moved on to other catastophies. Tidal wave from the Canary Islands and Yellowstone blowing up are the new rage.

As far as crime rates go, we are not the best. Not the worst either by any stretch of the imagination. We try to be fair. Many crimes are by those we have released from prison. We know that too. A very small percentage of the poulation commits the majority of the crimes.

We can be your scapegoat, we can be hated, feared, and despised by you and people who think like you. Your choice. We respect that too, even when we disagree.

Sometimes we are admired, even appreciated. Not often, but usually after a disaster of some sort. We give generously, as we should. We also give without seriously expecting reciprocity. We help where we can, not as much as we should at times, and then we are quickly told Yankee go home. And we do just that.

People say they hate the US government but love the people. Sorry, the government is an accurate reflection of the majority of the people.

While you may hate us for any number of reasons, that is your perogative. But your hate will get you nowhere and count for nothing. It will not translate into food, work, civility, a lack of corruption, or anything else you desire. It will only make you feel better for a moment, and in the long run solves nothing.

In this post you will find all the quotes you need to have a field day with diatribes. As for me, I am done. I hope you enjoy yourself. As Reagan once said, "Any Jackass can kick down a barn, but it takes a real craftsman to build one."

Fortunately most Brazilians I have met are not like you.
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
"government is an accurate refelction of the majority" Think about that statement, does this mean the majority of brasilians are corrupt, thieving, lying, incompetent, petulant bastards. I doubt that.
...
written by Guest, August 02, 2005
I have not seen evidence that says Washington is some how behind the "mesalao" deal but I think without a doubt Mr. Jefferson is a right-wing bastard who used this opportunity to destabalize the more "left-wing" members in Lula's govt and is now attacking Lula himself.
There is a lot of historical evidence that the rigth-wing elite does have close ties to the American government,. but I think Washington and the US government in general like Lula.
He has raised the amount Brazil's pays in interest payments, while reducing public spending in 2003 to some 1.8 billion reais. One can argue that the economy is very stabilized now, I dont think any internal crisis can hurt it like we saw in 2001 and 2002. That said other major terrorist attacks or damage to the global economy could hurt Brazil.
We shall see if investors will actually flee Brazil in 2006 as Lula tries to run for reelection. I think he has a good shot at winning but it will be very difficult.
I think that much of the middle-class support for the PT might disappear because a lot of the promises made to lower interest rates, and stimulate faster growth in a stable environment is not panning out. Many cite is social programs as success but as Lula said recently, he will not run if he thinks he think his second term will be the same or worse than his first term!
I personally like Ciro Gomes, but the market will be keeping their eyes out for how well Garotinho will do.

-Dt
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Lula looks and acts like the average political "Flim Flam Man."

Yes, old Lula could probably leave Brazil and make a lot of money playing "Three Card Monte," in New York.

Or, he could become a well known "door greeter," at the new Wynn hotel in Las Vegas.

If these two new occupations don pan out, he could get a job as a "Carnival Hawker."

Last but not least "Cirque Du Soliel" is always looking for workers!!!!!!

Re: Any Jackass...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
That's what we are talking about here, "A Jackass running the Brazilian Government." Hee Haw, Hee Haw!
For my american penpals
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
For the first above american imbecile that wrote:

“Fer starters there my synapse …” What does that mean??? That undercut the whole basis of your argument, didn’t it, opie?

I guess you meant to say:

“For starters here is my synopsis…”

hehehe…I can see that English is your second language, isn't it? What a shame you don't have a first. Do you speak fluent dyslexic or something? So it's dire, incomprehensible stupidity rather than plain dumb ignorance…You are done!

For the other above american savage…Listen here you intellectually-constipated dullard…

Hate….who mentioned hate? To hate you first must care… which I don’t if the subject is the United States. I only care when your country sticks their nose in our business (Brasil) for no other reason than their “greed blindness” as they have done all over the world.

Americans just don’t get it…Why does the entire world dislike the United States??? Spare me if your answer is jealousy, that word has been way over used by you yankees! Besides, nobody is jealous of walking targets such as americans.

Until another time, be warned: Your american gene pool could use a little chlorine.

Good day…your truly,

keol
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Keol, the part you are missing is that Americans don't wonder why the rest of the world hates us. We don't care! We don't lose even one minutes sleep over such fascist, hate mongering, crap that you spew. Means nothing. Do you think the rich brasilian industrialist sitting in his air conditioned palace cares that the average peasant hates him? You can continue with your rants and raves and blaming everyone for all your miserable failures and disgusting living conditions. Spew hate at the british police for an accident while your own intentionally murder citizens on a daily basis.
You see, Keol master of dog turds, Americans do the right thing not the popular thing and that's why they live in a great society. It isn't perfect, but as near as you will find. As I have told you before my pinheaded little friend, go to any country in the world and check the line outside the US consulates trying to get a visa to go there and participate in the land of opportunity. And we even let them protest and bitch and whine after they get here.So you see, we realize that your rants are the obvious musings of a man with no penis, who is overcompensating with vitriol, but Keol, my penis breathed friend, you only make us realize how poorly educated you really are.
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
I remember seeing Barbara Bush in Rio in 2001. That was probably part of the conspiracy . I always thought that white hair was a CIA ploy.

You wacko brasilians are too much with your conspiracy theories. You make Oliver Stone look sane.
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Not all Brazilians are anti American/ European. The majority of Brazilians that travel or work in other countries have a far more balanced outlook on the global situation than some of the weird, immature rants on this site.

I suspect that most of these anti American/ pro Marxist rants are from those who are attention seeking, or from those who have clearly never been abroad least of all to a former Communist country.

People can conjure up all kinds of rubbish on the Internet.
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
"For the other above american savage"

I’d check the bairros and favelas of Brazil to find your true savages. 40,000 murders a year and climbing. I’m actually surprised this macaco knows how to punch out a few rants on the keyboard. Most can’t sign their own name, nor can they read that piada "ordem e progresso" on their country’s flag.

"There is a lot of historical evidence that the rigth-wing elite does have close ties to the American government,."

WHO is the right wing elite, and WHAT is this historical evidence? If you refer to the Military Dictatorship between 64 and 85, 60% of the major companies in Brasil under their rule was owned by the state. Hardly a right wing doctrine.

But let us not forget, ANYTHING that doesn’t politically bode well with the “Perfect Latin American Idiot” (coined and copy written by Llosa, Montaner and Mendoza 1996) is considered RIGHT WING. Carodoso (PSDB, the SOCIAL DEMOCRATIC Party of Brazil) is now considered RIGHT WING by these fools. FHC also co wrote one of the quintessential leftist bibles for the region: Dependência e desenvolvimento na América Latina. However, because he didn’t lead a revolution like Castro (that is what these idiots want to see - bloodshed), but instead created a more economically stable and internationally respected country, he’s now considered RIGHT WING. The stupidity never ceases to amaze me.
To my american penpal pricks…
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
You wrote “my penis breathed friend”…Now I see why your logic is so diluted, you do all your thinking with your lower head of that in-grown penis! But that’s no excuse…Act Your Age, Not Your Dick Size!

You also mentioned above “make us realize how poorly educated you really are”

You seem to expend a lot of writing on a poorly educated person….Hummm! Isn’t it funny, here I articulate myself insulting your limited intellect in your native English language, can you do the same say in Portuguese, or even French, German or Spanish? I am open for any of them…earthworm!

Finally, TALK TO SOMEONE WHO CARES! Quite frankly I don’t give a s*** on what you have to say, american floating turd! I keep flushing you down the toilet but you keep coming back…hehehe.

Sincerely yours,

Keol

PS: Typical american reaction, evasive and then off the subject…Short Live Bush, the chimp!
I Have A Great Business Idea
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
American Flag front-door mats for visitors to wipe their feet on! Given the current anti-american climate around the world, business will be abound!

After all, american-led occupation and atrocities yields a tangible side!

keol

hehehe
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Keol, you have NEVER articulated yourself. You just rant, and rather childishly I might add.
The USA versus the World
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
The american neo-conservative world supremacists were handed an immense opportunity through the 9/11 incident, unfortunately.

Their puritanical missionary belief in being God's instruments on earth augmented by grand imperial ambitions, can now be realized through shameless emotional bogus moral claims, providing them with justifications for their fanaticism, ferocity and savagery!

Shame on you, GW Bush.

keol
brazil no please
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
I am an American living and working in Brazil...for now. believe me when I say that all Americans that I know do not want Brazil or any other country part of the USA. We have our own problems including G. Bush.

For the delusional ones who blame everything on the US, I feel sorry for you all with your 1960s commy revolutionary dogma and your inability to see that all people and nations have good and bad...and that transference of ones sins does not make you clean or honest..or even a nation with a future.
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
And in support of “brazil no please” comments, it’s exactly this kind of mass 1960’s revolutionary brain washing that maniacs such as Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe are now in power…..and look where that country is heading…..

In the days of Ian Smith the economy grew by 6% even during the height of a civil war and severe international sanctions. Zimbabwe/ Rhodesia had the most productive farming on the African Continent and had so much food surplus that they sold to the surrounding countries.

Out of a population of 14 million, 6 million are now starving. Inflation is 600%, unemployment nearing 80% and the economy has shrunk by 70% + in 5 years!

All the Whites have been kicked out and now Mugabe has turned on his own War Veterans from the “Liberation” struggle and started ousting them now from farms or burning their shacks. The same is starting to happen in South Africa and Namibia.
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
"these devil gringoes will end at nothing to undermine leftist and latin american"

And the true mantra of the “Perfect Latin American Idiot” is spelled out for all to see. Folks, these bigoted souls don’t hate Bush, or the system, they hate gringos. Full stop. Their childish rants have been on display for decades. The US Government has changed on a number of occasions but the Idiot’s malignancy and special brand of fatuousness has persisted throughout. From Roosevelt to Bush, democrats and republicans have come and gone, yet the idiot’s ideology has not been refashioned nor their hatred unabated. Bush just fuels their fires.

The oddity in all of this is that none of these “idiots” can calmly or coherently explain the roots of their hatred. Actually, they are blind to those roots. They offer little more than insipid ill-informed, usually fraudulent, snippets of world politics and conspiracy theories. At times, they do provide historical facts however always painted with their unique hue of surreal revisionism. Their debating arsenal is mostly made up of cheap one-liners and vulgar retorts. Again, look to Keol’s posts for proof.

When it comes right down to it, it is simple bigotry. However it is a peculiar and misguided ilk of bigotry. As opposed to looking down on what one wrongly believes to be inferior, the Idiot looks up believing somehow the developed world is superior, and this is at the root of his anguish.

Keol exemplifies the “idiot”: an insecure thought-devoid throwback from the 60s.

Although they’ve remained steadfast in their dogma, the “idiot” is now (albeit slowly) being eclipsed by the burgeoning middle class in Latin America that has also grown weary of blaming evil foreign specters for their problems. The middle class is now looking (begrudgingly) to their own governments to enact true and meaningful reforms. Keol and his ilk are a dying breed.
Anti-Brazilian sentiments
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
If you guys want to offend keol for his vision of the US please go ahead. However, remember that not all Brazilians readers here are anti-US or anti any other country. So, be a little more conscious of what you say or practice your target against those who you think are your enemies and spare the friends.

A Brazilian
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Anti-Brazilian sentiments

Point well taken "A Brazilian".
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
As an American, I welcome Keol's comments. I disagree with about everything he says, but he has his opinions. That is what the Internet was intended for. Free exchange of information outside the control of most governments.

While he is in the minority with respect to Brazilian attitudes, his views are no less real to him and he is passionate about them. Ditto with Republicans and Democrats here. We disagree - openly and sometimes quite nastily - but the dialog is important. It makes all of us think.
Americans Reside in Denial
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Just Sickening…

Did you say …bla bla bla….”They offer little more than insipid ill-informed, usually fraudulent, snippets of world politics and conspiracy theories”…

Do You Want Historical Facts???

Observation: The listing below does not include many of the other U.S. "interventions" where U.S. troops were not the primary force. For example, the U.S. intervention in the Greek civil war during the 1950s. Nor the U.S. nuclear threat that one might well consider a form of intervention (the U.S. nuclear threat during the 73 Arab-Israeli war). Nor does it include many CIA organized war efforts such as the long war against the leftist Angolan government waged by the U.S.. Nor does it include all the countries intervened/invaded by the U.S. in World War I and World War II.

Here it goes…American Military Interventions of the 20th Century (add Iraq + Afghanistan to include the 21st Century) with troops actually on the ground:

PHILIPPINES/l898-1910(-?)/Naval, troops/Seized from Spain, U.S. troops kill 600,000 Filipinos.
CUBA/l898-1902(-?)/Naval, troops/Seized from Spain, U.S. still illegally holds Navy base there over Cuban objections.
PANAMA/1901-03(-?)/Naval, troops/Broke off from Colombia in a U.S. organized 'rebellion', U.S. annexes Canal Zone.
HONDURAS/l903/Troops/U.S. Marines intervene in revolution.
DOMINICAN REP./1903-04/Troops/U.S. business interests protected in Revolution.
KOREA/1904-05/Troops/U.S. Marines land in Russo-Japanese War.
CUBA/1906-09/Troops/U.S. Marines land in democratic election.
NICARAGUA/1907/Troops/"Dollar Diplomacy" protectorate (psuedo- colony) set up.
HONDURAS/l907/Troops/U.S. Marines land during war with Nicaragua.
PANAMA/l908/Troops/U.S. Marines intervene in election contest.
NICARAGUA/l9l0/Troops/U.S. Marines land in Bluefields and Corinto.
HONDURAS/1911/Troops/U.S. business interests protected in civil war.
CHINA/1911-41/Naval, troops/Continuous occupation with flare-ups
CUBA/1912/Troops/U.S. business interests protected in Havana.
PANAMA/l9l2/Troops/U.S. Marines land during heated election.
HONDURAS/l9l2/Troops/Marines protect U.S. economic interests.
NICARAGUA/1912-33/Troops, bombing/20-year occupation, fought guerrillas.
MEXICO/l9l3/Naval/Americans evacuated during revolution.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC/1914/Naval/Fight with rebels over Santo Domingo.
MEXICO/1914-18/Naval, troops/Series of interventions against Mexican nationalists.
HAITI/1914-34/Troops, bombing/19-year occupation after revolts.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC/1916-24/Troops/8-year U.S. Marine occupation.
CUBA/1917-33/Troops/Military occupation, U.S. declares Cuba an economic protectorate (psuedo-colony).
USSR/1918-22/Naval, troops/Five landings to fight Bolsheviks in effort to overthrow the fledgling socialist government.
PANAMA/1918-20/Troops/"Police duty" during unrest after elections.
HONDURAS/l9l9/Troops/U.S. Marines land during election campaign.
GUATEMALA/1920/Troops/2-week intervention against unionists.
TURKEY/1922/Troops/U.S. fought nationalists in Smyrna.
CHINA/1922-27/Naval, troops/Deployment during nationalist revolt.
HONDURAS/1924-25/Troops/Landed twice during election strife.
PANAMA/1925/Troops/U.S. Marines suppress general strike.
CHINA/l928-34/Troops/U.S. Marines stationed throughout the country.
EL SALVADOR/l932/Naval/Warships sent during Marti revolt.
KOREA/l951-53(-?)/Troops, naval, bombing, nuclear threats/U.S.& South Korea fight China & North Korea to stalemate; A-bomb threat in l950, and against China in l953. China accuses U.S. of biological warfare. Still have bases.
IRAN/l953/Covert/CIA overthrows democratically elected socialist premier, installs Shah as dictator.
GUATEMALA/l954/Command operation, bombing, nuclear threat/CIA directs exile invasion after new gov't nationalizes U.S. companies' lands; bombers based in Nicaragua.
LEBANON/l958/Troops, naval/U.S. Marine occupation against rebels.
PANAMA/1958/Troops/Flag protests erupt into confrontation.
VIETNAM/l960-75/Troops, naval, bombing, nuclear threats/Fought South Vietnamese revolt & North Vietnam during the Vietnamese civil war; over two million Vietnamese casualties in longest U.S. war; atomic bomb threats in l968 and l969.
LAOS/1961/Covert/Military buildup during guerrilla war.
CUBA/l961/Covert/CIA-directed exile invasion fails.
PANAMA/l964/Troops/Panamanians shot for urging canal's return.
INDONESIA/l965/Covert/One million-plus killed in CIA-assisted army coup. CIA provides assassination lists to military, plus weapons.
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC/1965-66/Troops, bombing/U.S. Marines land during election campaign.
GUATEMALA/l966-67/Covert/Green Berets intervene against rebels.
CAMBODIA/l969-75/Bombing, troops, naval/Up to 2 million killed in decade during/after U.S. invasion of Cambodia and bombing, starvation, and political chaos.
OMAN/l970/Covert/U.S. directs Iranian marine invasion to intervene in Omani civil war.
LAOS/l971-73/Command operation, bombing/U.S. directs South Vietnamese invasion; "carpet-bombs" countryside.
CHILE/1973/Covert/CIA funds and backs coup ousts democratically-elected Marxist president and installs brutal military dictatorship.
CAMBODIA/l975/Troops, bombing/Intervenes to seize captured ship, 28 die in copter crash.
IRAN/l980/Troops, nuclear threat, aborted bombing/Raid to rescue Embassy hostages; 8 troops die in copter-plane crash. Soviets warned not to get involved in revolution.
LIBYA/l981/Naval jets/Two Libyan jets shot down in maneuvers.
EL SALVADOR/l981-?/Covert/U.S. mercenaries, military advisors, overflights aid anti-rebel war.
NICARAGUA/l981-90/Covert, naval/CIA funds, trains, equips and directs exile (Contra) invasions, plants harbor mines against revolution.
HONDURAS/l982-?/Troops/Maneuvers, help build bases near borders to intimidate Nicaragua.
LEBANON/l982-84/Naval, bombing, troops/Marines expel PLO and back Christian Phalangists, Navy bombs and shells Muslim positions.
GRENADA/l983-84/Troops, bombing/Invasion four years after socialist revolution. U.S. installs puppet government.
LIBYA/l986/Bombing, naval/Air strikes try to topple nationalist gov't.
BOLIVIA/1987/Troops/Coast Guard and Army assists raids on cocaine region.
IRAN/l987-88/Naval, bombing/US intervenes on side of Iraq in Gulf War.
LIBYA/1989/Naval jets/Two Libyan jets shot down.
PANAMA/1989-?/Troops, bombing/Nationalist government ousted by invasion. U.S. installs puppet government and refuses to hold new elections.
LIBERIA/1990-?/Troops/Foreigners evacuated during civil war; troops protect CIA communications/listening post.
SAUDI ARABIA/1990-?/Troops, jets/Iraq countered after invading Kuwait. Forces also in Oman, Qatar, Bahrain, UAE, Israel.
IRAQ/1990-?/Naval, bombing, troops/Blockade of Iraqi and Jordanian ports; large-scale destruction of Iraqi military.
KUWAIT/1991-?/Naval, bombing, troops/Attacks on Iraqi military; effort to return dictatorial royal family to throne.

SHALL I SAY MORE? Now then…I can hardly call that, the United States, a peace loving nation, can you?

Good day,

keol
Re: Americans Reside in Denial
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Actually yes. Thank you for pointing it out.
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
What’s that suppose to prove? You simple little cut and paste simpleton.

Where is the depth of analysis? Where’s the history of each? Christ, I bet you couldn’t find half those counties on a f**king map if you tired. Damn, and I thought you had at least one functioning synapse. You prove once again, the theory of the “Perfect Latin American Idiot”. What’s even more amusing is that is that Brazil’s not even on the list and this Brazilian is foaming at the mouth, and pissing all over his keyboard ready to pop an artery. ROFL.

Here’s some homework for you Mr. potato head. Do a body count from each and every date you posted, and then compare that with the murder rate for Brazil over JUST the last 10 years. Then talk to me about peace loving nations. Otario!
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Actually, there were millions killed in Vietnam. I doubt any country has a crime rate that high, even Brasil. Still, many of those other dates, the US was invited or asked to intervene.
the US was invited or asked to intervene
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
hahahaha....right!
I bet you couldn’t find half those coun
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
...on a map! Wanna bet? I know, Geography is not an american forte!

and, America Knows Nothing Of Food, Love, Or Art…The National Dish Of America Is Menus....hahaha

keol

PS f**k GW Bush and his cronies...
Ahh....O FDP é brasileiro metido
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
a ser gringo...sua demonia malfeita, deve estar sofrendo com uma prisão de ventre, né? Traidora Safada, Piranha Problemática!

Beijos do seu keol...

What’s that suppose to prove? cont.
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
….”You “simple” little cut and paste.” hehehe

It should have been “Simple cut and paste.” You get an “F” for English.

Moreover, you have a warped sense of reality, what a loser!

I’ve got to listen to your senseless uber-babble? Your verbiage is more inflated than your dad’s blow-up doll of Denis Rodman…. Shut up before I rubber stamp "Tedious Gimp. Keep clear!" on your sloped forehead.

Love u 2…keol
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Yawn. SOSDD. If life is so sacred to you, do some real due diligence and learn the numbers killed by non-free societies, partially free socities, and free societies. Communism has been a plague on mankind.

Also, while you are at it, some REAL statistics on conflicts with the data to back it up. Don't gag on your predispositions.

http://freedomspeace.blogspot.com/2005/07/still-no-wars-between-democracies.html

from the link above.......................................................................

From Marshall's data, I'll include as violence any that is indicated in his data as "international." This is a hard test, since it includes violence short of war. From Freedom House, I will use their Free (F) rating of a country for a year as defining a liberal democracy in terms of civil liberties and political rights.

First, how many liberal democracies are there versus the total number of countries. For five years spans after 1972 and ending with 2003 (year, number of liberal democracies, total number of countries):

• 1972, 43, 148
• 1975, 39, 158
• 1980, 50, 162
• 1985, 55, 166
• 1990, 64, 165
• 1995, 75, 191
• 2000, 85, 192
• 2003, 87, 192

Now, for the classification of violence between types of regimes (F = free, PF = partly free, NF = not free, where F-F = between free countries, etc.)

• F-F = 0
• F-PF = 6
• F-NF = 11
• PF-PF = 5
• PF-NF= 4
• NF-NF= 20

So, between which countries is there the least violence ? Between liberal democracies. Which countries are the most violent towards each other? Nondemocracies. All as precisely predicted by the democratic peace. A note on statistical tests. Think of this subjectively. Here you have all these liberal democracies for each of thirty-one years, and none of them have violence between them. This is not a matter of just five or ten democracies, but by the end of the 1990s, there are over eighty. This number is not my reckoning, but that of Freedom House. And by Marshall's data, in spite of so many democracies, none had violence between them vs. 20 cases of violence between the nonfree ones during these years.
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
Looks like the poster above pegged Keol perfectly. He´s just a bigot that hates gringos.
you evil gringoes!!
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
brother and comrade keol may jesus christ smile on you.

all that you say about the f**king gringo imperialism is totally factual and valid.

tens of millios of developing world (a.k.a. - non-aryan) peoples were massacred by the evil gringoes.

mostly by the racist, exclusionary, white and world supremacist republican dominated government in the USA.

these devil republicans are out to recolonize the world to make them the stooges and the puppets of the republican dominated government.

the democrats are slightly lesser evil and faced with 2 options between the devil incarnate party on this planet and a slightly better option, one should choose and support and the mainly non-interventioning and non-bullying democratic party in the US political system.
Re: Robert Mugabe of Zimbabwe
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
He has the right idea and the right approach, kick out meddling, murderous, Europeans, and then kick out their sympathizers.

The White European invader is the Malignant Cancer of the World!
...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
All this can be found on the National Security Archives at: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB118/ check it out!

BRAZIL MARKS 40th ANNIVERSARY OF MILITARY COUP

DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SHED LIGHT ON U.S. ROLE

Audio tape: President Johnson urged taking "every step that we can" to support overthrow of Joao Goulart

U.S. Ambassador Requested Pre-positioned Armaments to aid Golpistas; Acknowledged covert operations backing street demonstrations, civic forces and resistance groups

Edited by Peter Kornbluh

Washington D.C., 31 March 2004 - "I think we ought to take every step that we can, be prepared to do everything that we need to do," President Johnson instructed his aides regarding preparations for a coup in Brazil on March 31, 1964. On the 40th anniversary of the military putsch, the National Security Archive today posted recently declassified documents on U.S. policy deliberations and operations leading up to the overthrow of the Goulart government on April 1, 1964. The documents reveal new details on U.S. readiness to back the coup forces.

The Archive's posting includes a declassified audio tape of Lyndon Johnson being briefed by phone at his Texas ranch, as the Brazilian military mobilized against Goulart. "I'd put everybody that had any imagination or ingenuity…[CIA Director John] McCone…[Secretary of Defense Robert] McNamara" on making sure the coup went forward, Johnson is heard to instruct undersecretary of State George Ball. "We just can't take this one," the tape records LBJ's opinion. "I'd get right on top of it and stick my neck out a little."

Among the documents are Top Secret cables sent by U.S. Ambassador Lincoln Gordon who forcefully pressed Washington for direct involvement in supporting coup plotters led by Army Chief of Staff General Humberto Castello Branco. "If our influence is to be brought to bear to help avert a major disaster here-which might make Brazil the China of the 1960s-this is where both I and all my senior advisors believe our support should be placed," Gordon wrote to high State Department, White House and CIA officials on March 27, 1964.

To assure the success of the coup, Gordon recommended "that measures be taken soonest to prepare for a clandestine delivery of arms of non-US origin, to be made available to Castello Branco supporters in Sao Paulo." In a subsequent cable, declassified just last month, Gordon suggested that these weapons be "pre-positioned prior any outbreak of violence," to be used by paramilitary units and "friendly military against hostile military if necessary." To conceal the U.S. role, Gordon recommended the arms be delivered via "unmarked submarine to be off-loaded at night in isolated shore spots in state of Sao Paulo south of Santos."

Gordon's cables also confirm CIA covert measures "to help strengthen resistance forces" in Brazil. These included "covert support for pro-democracy street rallies…and encouragement [of] democratic and anti-communist sentiment in Congress, armed forces, friendly labor and student groups, church, and business." Four days before the coup, Gordon informed Washington that "we may be requesting modest supplementary funds for other covert action programs in the near future." He also requested that the U.S. send tankers carrying "POL"-petroleum, oil and lubricants-to facilitate the logistical operations of the military coup plotters, and deploy a naval task force to intimidate Goulart's backers and be in position to intervene militarily if fighting became protracted.

Although the CIA is widely known to have been involved in covert action against Goulart leading up to the coup, its operational files on intervention in Brazil remain classified-to the consternation of historians. Archive analyst Peter Kornbluh called on the Agency to "lift the veil of secrecy off one of the most important episodes of U.S. intervention in the history of Latin America" by completely declassifying the record of CIA operations in Brazil. Both the Clinton and Bush administrations conducted significant declassifications on the military regimes in Chile and Argentina, he noted. "Declassification of the historical record on the 1964 coup and the military regimes that followed would advance U.S. interests in strengthening the cause of democracy and human rights in Brazil, and in the rest of Latin America," Kornbluh said.

On March 31, the documents show, Gordon received a secret telegram from Secretary of State Dean Rusk stating that the Administration had decided to immediately mobilize a naval task force to take up position off the coast of Brazil; dispatch U.S. Navy tankers "bearing POL" from Aruba; and assemble an airlift of 110 tons of ammunition and other equipment including "CS agent"-a special gas for mob control. During an emergency White House meeting on April 1, according to a CIA memorandum of conversation, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara told President Johnson that the task force had already set sail, and an Esso tanker with motor and aviation gasoline would soon be in the vicinity of Santos. An ammunition airlift, he reported, was being readied in New Jersey and could be sent to Brazil within 16 hours.

Such U.S. military support for the military coup proved unnecessary; Castello Branco's forces succeeded in overthrowing Goulart far faster and with much less armed resistance then U.S. policy makers anticipated. On April 2, CIA agents in Brazil cabled that "Joao Goulart, deposed president of Brazil, left Porto Alegre about 1pm local time for Montevideo."

The documents and cables refer to the coup forces as "the democratic rebellion." After General Castello Branco's takeover, the military ruled Brazil until 1985.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Documents are in PDF format. You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.

Hear/Read the Documents

l) White House Audio Tape, President Lyndon B. Johnson discussing the impending coup in Brazil with Undersecretary of State George Ball, March 31, 1964

This audio clip is available in several formats:
Windows Media Audio - High bandwidth (7.11 MB)
Windows Media Audio - Low bandwidth (3.57 MB)
MP3 - (4.7 MB)

In this 5:08 minute White House tape obtained from the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, President Johnson is recorded speaking on the phone from his Texas ranch with Undersecretary of State George Ball and Assistant Secretary for Latin America, Thomas Mann. Ball briefs Johnson on that status of military moves in Brazil to overthrow the government of Joao Goulart who U.S. officials view as a leftist closely associated with the Brazilian Communist Party. Johnson gives Ball the green light to actively support the coup if U.S. backing is needed. "I think we ought to take every step that we can, be prepared to do everything that we need to do" he orders. In an apparent reference to Goulart, Johnson states "we just can't take this one." "I'd get right on top of it and stick my neck out a little," he instructs Ball.

2) State Department, Top Secret Cable from Rio De Janiero, March 27, 1964

Ambassador Lincoln Gordon wrote this lengthy, five part, cable to the highest national security officers of the U.S. government, including CIA director John McCone and the Secretaries of Defense and State, Robert McNamara and Dean Rusk. He provides an assessment that President Goulart is working with the Brazilian Communist Party to "seize dictatorial power" and urges the U.S. to support the forces of General Castello Branco. Gordon recommends "a clandestine delivery of arms" for Branco's supporters as well as a shipment of gas and oil to help the coup forces succeed and suggests such support will be supplemented by CIA covert operations. He also urges the administration to "prepare without delay against the contingency of needed overt intervention at a second stage."

3) State Department, Top Secret Cable from Amb. Lincoln Gordon, March 29, 1964

Ambassador Gordon updates high U.S. officials on the deterioration of the situation in Brazil. In this cable, declassified on February 24, 2004 by the LBJ Presidential Library, he reiterates the "manifold" need to have a secret shipment of weapons "pre-positioned prior any outbreak of violence" to be "used by paramilitary units working with Democratic Military groups" and recommends a public statement by the administration "to reassure the large numbers of democrats in Brazil that we are not indifferent to the danger of a Communist revolution here."

4) CIA, Intelligence Information Cable on "Plans of Revolutionary Plotters in Minas Gerias," March 30, 1964

The CIA station in Brazil transmitted this field report from intelligence sources in Belo Horizonte that bluntly stated "a revolution by anti-Goulart forces will definitely get under way this week, probably in the next few days. The cable transmits intelligence on military plans to "march toward Rio." The "revolution," the intelligence source predicted, "will not be resolved quickly and will be bloody."

5) State Department, Secret Cable to Amb. Lincoln Gordon in Rio, March 31, 1964

Secretary of State Dean Rusk sends Gordon a list of the White House decisions "taken in order [to] be in a position to render assistance at appropriate time to anti-Goulart forces if it is decided this should be done." The decisions include sending US naval tankers loaded with petroleum, oil and lubricants from Aruba to Santos, Brazil; assembling 110 tons of ammunition and other equipment for pro-coup forces; and dispatching a naval brigade including an aircraft carrier, several destroyers and escorts to conduct be positioned off the coast of Brazil. Several hours later, a second cable is sent amending the number of ships, and dates they will be arriving off the coast.

6) CIA, Secret Memorandum of Conversation on "Meeting at the White House 1 April 1964 Subject-Brazil," April 1, 1964

This memorandum of conversation records a high level meeting, held in the White House, between President Johnson and his top national security aides on Brazil. CIA deputy chief of Western Hemisphere operations, Desmond Fitzgerald recorded the briefing given to Johnson and the discussion on the progress of the coup. Defense Secretary reported on the movements of the naval task force sailing towad Brazil, and the arms and ammunition being assembled in New Jersey to resupply the coup plotters if necessary.

7) CIA, Intelligence Information Cable on "Departure of Goulart from Porto Alegre for Montevideo," April 2, 1964

The CIA station in Brazil reports that the deposed president, Joao Goulart, left Brazil for exile in Uruguay at l pm, on April 2. His departure marks the success of the military coup in Brazil.


...
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
All this can be found on the National Security Archives at: http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB118/ check it out!

BRAZIL MARKS 40th ANNIVERSARY OF MILITARY COUP

DECLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS SHED LIGHT ON U.S. ROLE

Audio tape: President Johnson urged taking "every step that we can" to support overthrow of Joao Goulart

U.S. Ambassador Requested Pre-positioned Armaments to aid Golpistas; Acknowledged covert operations backing street demonstrations, civic forces and resistance groups

Edited by Peter Kornbluh

Washington D.C., 31 March 2004 - "I think we ought to take every step that we can, be prepared to do everything that we need to do," President Johnson instructed his aides regarding preparations for a coup in Brazil on March 31, 1964. On the 40th anniversary of the military putsch, the National Security Archive today posted recently declassified documents on U.S. policy deliberations and operations leading up to the overthrow of the Goulart government on April 1, 1964. The documents reveal new details on U.S. readiness to back the coup forces.

The Archive's posting includes a declassified audio tape of Lyndon Johnson being briefed by phone at his Texas ranch, as the Brazilian military mobilized against Goulart. "I'd put everybody that had any imagination or ingenuity…[CIA Director John] McCone…[Secretary of Defense Robert] McNamara" on making sure the coup went forward, Johnson is heard to instruct undersecretary of State George Ball. "We just can't take this one," the tape records LBJ's opinion. "I'd get right on top of it and stick my neck out a little."

Among the documents are Top Secret cables sent by U.S. Ambassador Lincoln Gordon who forcefully pressed Washington for direct involvement in supporting coup plotters led by Army Chief of Staff General Humberto Castello Branco. "If our influence is to be brought to bear to help avert a major disaster here-which might make Brazil the China of the 1960s-this is where both I and all my senior advisors believe our support should be placed," Gordon wrote to high State Department, White House and CIA officials on March 27, 1964.

To assure the success of the coup, Gordon recommended "that measures be taken soonest to prepare for a clandestine delivery of arms of non-US origin, to be made available to Castello Branco supporters in Sao Paulo." In a subsequent cable, declassified just last month, Gordon suggested that these weapons be "pre-positioned prior any outbreak of violence," to be used by paramilitary units and "friendly military against hostile military if necessary." To conceal the U.S. role, Gordon recommended the arms be delivered via "unmarked submarine to be off-loaded at night in isolated shore spots in state of Sao Paulo south of Santos."

Gordon's cables also confirm CIA covert measures "to help strengthen resistance forces" in Brazil. These included "covert support for pro-democracy street rallies…and encouragement [of] democratic and anti-communist sentiment in Congress, armed forces, friendly labor and student groups, church, and business." Four days before the coup, Gordon informed Washington that "we may be requesting modest supplementary funds for other covert action programs in the near future." He also requested that the U.S. send tankers carrying "POL"-petroleum, oil and lubricants-to facilitate the logistical operations of the military coup plotters, and deploy a naval task force to intimidate Goulart's backers and be in position to intervene militarily if fighting became protracted.

Although the CIA is widely known to have been involved in covert action against Goulart leading up to the coup, its operational files on intervention in Brazil remain classified-to the consternation of historians. Archive analyst Peter Kornbluh called on the Agency to "lift the veil of secrecy off one of the most important episodes of U.S. intervention in the history of Latin America" by completely declassifying the record of CIA operations in Brazil. Both the Clinton and Bush administrations conducted significant declassifications on the military regimes in Chile and Argentina, he noted. "Declassification of the historical record on the 1964 coup and the military regimes that followed would advance U.S. interests in strengthening the cause of democracy and human rights in Brazil, and in the rest of Latin America," Kornbluh said.

On March 31, the documents show, Gordon received a secret telegram from Secretary of State Dean Rusk stating that the Administration had decided to immediately mobilize a naval task force to take up position off the coast of Brazil; dispatch U.S. Navy tankers "bearing POL" from Aruba; and assemble an airlift of 110 tons of ammunition and other equipment including "CS agent"-a special gas for mob control. During an emergency White House meeting on April 1, according to a CIA memorandum of conversation, Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara told President Johnson that the task force had already set sail, and an Esso tanker with motor and aviation gasoline would soon be in the vicinity of Santos. An ammunition airlift, he reported, was being readied in New Jersey and could be sent to Brazil within 16 hours.

Such U.S. military support for the military coup proved unnecessary; Castello Branco's forces succeeded in overthrowing Goulart far faster and with much less armed resistance then U.S. policy makers anticipated. On April 2, CIA agents in Brazil cabled that "Joao Goulart, deposed president of Brazil, left Porto Alegre about 1pm local time for Montevideo."

The documents and cables refer to the coup forces as "the democratic rebellion." After General Castello Branco's takeover, the military ruled Brazil until 1985.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Note: Documents are in PDF format. You will need to download and install the free Adobe Acrobat Reader to view.

Hear/Read the Documents

l) White House Audio Tape, President Lyndon B. Johnson discussing the impending coup in Brazil with Undersecretary of State George Ball, March 31, 1964

This audio clip is available in several formats:
Windows Media Audio - High bandwidth (7.11 MB)
Windows Media Audio - Low bandwidth (3.57 MB)
MP3 - (4.7 MB)

In this 5:08 minute White House tape obtained from the Lyndon Baines Johnson Library, President Johnson is recorded speaking on the phone from his Texas ranch with Undersecretary of State George Ball and Assistant Secretary for Latin America, Thomas Mann. Ball briefs Johnson on that status of military moves in Brazil to overthrow the government of Joao Goulart who U.S. officials view as a leftist closely associated with the Brazilian Communist Party. Johnson gives Ball the green light to actively support the coup if U.S. backing is needed. "I think we ought to take every step that we can, be prepared to do everything that we need to do" he orders. In an apparent reference to Goulart, Johnson states "we just can't take this one." "I'd get right on top of it and stick my neck out a little," he instructs Ball.

2) State Department, Top Secret Cable from Rio De Janiero, March 27, 1964

Ambassador Lincoln Gordon wrote this lengthy, five part, cable to the highest national security officers of the U.S. government, including CIA director John McCone and the Secretaries of Defense and State, Robert McNamara and Dean Rusk. He provides an assessment that President Goulart is working with the Brazilian Communist Party to "seize dictatorial power" and urges the U.S. to support the forces of General Castello Branco. Gordon recommends "a clandestine delivery of arms" for Branco's supporters as well as a shipment of gas and oil to help the coup forces succeed and suggests such support will be supplemented by CIA covert operations. He also urges the administration to "prepare without delay against the contingency of needed overt intervention at a second stage."

3) State Department, Top Secret Cable from Amb. Lincoln Gordon, March 29, 1964

Ambassador Gordon updates high U.S. officials on the deterioration of the situation in Brazil. In this cable, declassified on February 24, 2004 by the LBJ Presidential Library, he reiterates the "manifold" need to have a secret shipment of weapons "pre-positioned prior any outbreak of violence" to be "used by paramilitary units working with Democratic Military groups" and recommends a public statement by the administration "to reassure the large numbers of democrats in Brazil that we are not indifferent to the danger of a Communist revolution here."

4) CIA, Intelligence Information Cable on "Plans of Revolutionary Plotters in Minas Gerias," March 30, 1964

The CIA station in Brazil transmitted this field report from intelligence sources in Belo Horizonte that bluntly stated "a revolution by anti-Goulart forces will definitely get under way this week, probably in the next few days. The cable transmits intelligence on military plans to "march toward Rio." The "revolution," the intelligence source predicted, "will not be resolved quickly and will be bloody."

5) State Department, Secret Cable to Amb. Lincoln Gordon in Rio, March 31, 1964

Secretary of State Dean Rusk sends Gordon a list of the White House decisions "taken in order [to] be in a position to render assistance at appropriate time to anti-Goulart forces if it is decided this should be done." The decisions include sending US naval tankers loaded with petroleum, oil and lubricants from Aruba to Santos, Brazil; assembling 110 tons of ammunition and other equipment for pro-coup forces; and dispatching a naval brigade including an aircraft carrier, several destroyers and escorts to conduct be positioned off the coast of Brazil. Several hours later, a second cable is sent amending the number of ships, and dates they will be arriving off the coast.

6) CIA, Secret Memorandum of Conversation on "Meeting at the White House 1 April 1964 Subject-Brazil," April 1, 1964

This memorandum of conversation records a high level meeting, held in the White House, between President Johnson and his top national security aides on Brazil. CIA deputy chief of Western Hemisphere operations, Desmond Fitzgerald recorded the briefing given to Johnson and the discussion on the progress of the coup. Defense Secretary reported on the movements of the naval task force sailing towad Brazil, and the arms and ammunition being assembled in New Jersey to resupply the coup plotters if necessary.

7) CIA, Intelligence Information Cable on "Departure of Goulart from Porto Alegre for Montevideo," April 2, 1964

The CIA station in Brazil reports that the deposed president, Joao Goulart, left Brazil for exile in Uruguay at l pm, on April 2. His departure marks the success of the military coup in Brazil.


robert mugabe of zimbabwe
written by Guest, August 03, 2005
is the greatest black man to have ever lived, since he rightfully like robin hood, took back the lands of the native black people from the exploitary and murderous white invader farmers to the black african land.

gringoes are the western hemisphere's version of the exploitary and murderous white invaders of the land.

Down with the Infidels!
written by Guest, August 04, 2005
hehehe
...
written by Guest, August 04, 2005
Actually, there were 44,000 Americans killed in the vietNam war. That's just a good year in brasil among their own citizens
keol
written by beachbum, August 04, 2005
hehehe,is that all you have?you have your head in another world
...
written by Guest, August 04, 2005
Your response to the issues over Zimbabwe proves that you are immature.


...
written by Guest, August 04, 2005
How about this, you will see more African leaders kicking out Europeans and taking back their lands and resources.

EUROPEAN SCUM! GO BACK TO YOUR OWN CRAP HOLES, PAINT YOUR FACES,INTERBREED, AND STOP TRYING TO LIGHTEN UP THE WORLD TO YOUR LIKING! STINK UP YOUR OWN LANDS!

KEEP YOUR DESEASE TO YOURSELVES!!!

US is imperialist
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
True, but if not the US than who? Someone has to be, history demands it. If the US get's too out of control, then there will be a coalition of countries that will bring it back into line( or at least try), or it will collapse internally. All of the world does not hate the US, but they should certainly fear it. Not the American people per se, but the military industrial complex( perpetual war making machine ) and it's evil sister the mega corporation complex( exploiter of workers and the environment). The US does provide a benefit of sorts in being the worlds policeman, but the cost for "protection" is high, both economicly,politically, and environmentally. The US is like Tony Soprano, can do some decent things occasionally, but will beat the crap out of you, or worse, if you get in it's way.
Mugabe
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
Interesting how you speak for Mugabe. Maybe we should hear from the 6 million starving in his country about how wonderful this man is and what a great leader he is.

Peace is the answer
little boy keol
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
I am amazed you people continue to engage Keol. Obviously, his mommy didn't give him enough attention as a little boy so he has taken to getting his attention from all of you with his naughty words and irrational rants.

Keol , keep 'em coming. I, for one, like listening to an idiot like you. It makes me feel better about the rest of humanity. Your stupidity is only superceded by your audacity.

Abraco,

...
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
hey keyhole, I just finished your girlfriend. she is wondering when you might grow a penis?
Re:Interesting how you speak for Mugabe
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
I've got a better idea, and you can do this if you are near any major American City. I will use Denver Colorado as my example!

Walk through the neighborhoods and talk to the10,000 Americans who are starving in Denver alone.

I'm sure you will find this scene played out in every American City.

In the richest country in the history of man!!!

You see America has a tendency to hide it's problems from the public view as much as possible.

It uses the Media to bad-mouth other countries and extol the virtues of this rat infested, festering, sewer of a country!!!

If you want to do a public service, shut your mouth, work on getting non-violent convicts out of these American Concentration camps, issue them passports and visa to go anywhere but back to craphole neighborhoods the stole their youth from them!!!

SO MUCH FOR FREEDOM!

MORE LIKE, BROTHER CAN YOU SPARE A DIME!!!

Re: US is imperialist
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
Right on target!!

Knock off the best and you become the best...

Otherwise shut up and pay Caesar his taxes!
pathetic gringoes
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
go home gringo. these evil, coup mongering devils are good for nothing, but to stir coups in latin nations and destablize socialist countries. no wonder the entire world hates the likes of the rat infested, imperialistic, racist, right wing, hegemonic gringoes.

no one f**king gives a s**t about the rat infested gringoes. gringoes may as well live in space. f**k you gringoes!

you are the devil incarnate of this earth. pathetic and evil gringos!
what are yankees good for!
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
nothing!

except for stealing your land, destabilizing your country, stealing your wives, right wing oligarchy supporting, imposing modern day capitalist and elitist feudalism, making the rich richer at the expense of the poorer, plundering the resources of the world, through either coercian, IMF and world bank bullying.

look at all the coups throughout the world and in latin america perpetrated by the f**king gringoes.

the gringos are rejects (gringoes are actually the rejects of europe, who were kicked out of europe, and in the americas they just killed indigenous peoples and enslaved black people).

beat it gringo.
Keol , keep \'em coming.
written by Guest, August 05, 2005
To the maggot (american) above, you don't count, inconsequential floating dog caca!

keol

f**k the Bush baby and all his gangsters!
...
written by Guest, August 06, 2005
I spend some time reading the sheat above
hou you can be so ignorant?
you think usa is guilty for brazilian corruption?
They are not!
USA want's a stable brazil, to sel their garbage for us, not destroy the political stability of our country.
Corruption is a cancer in our politicy since Pedro alvares cabral land in Bahia.
Education of our people is the only way to save brasil from corruption.
Elect semi alphabetized people as the president of the repuplic does not help anyway.
Cala a Boca!
written by Guest, August 06, 2005
Bahiano da Fera de Santana...vai lamber o pinto do seu portero, sua nojenta!

beijos

Keol, will you be our next leader?
written by Guest, August 07, 2005
I don't know why anyone would argue with Keol's magnanimous assessment of the situation. I, for one, think he is spot on. Of course it's 'synopses' that he is deficient in, not synapses. (Synopses are plural for synopsis, which for or non non-native English speakers is the point where a nerve impulse fails to pass in so many of the above posts.) Of course evil American Capitalists tempted and set up the good-in-their-hearts Workers Party officials. They are just human. I don't live in a nice house because I worked hard and rose above challenges. I live in a big house because my corporate comrades are setting up innocent leaders in other countries in order to squelch their progress. And I say keep up the good work. The more jobs that are taken over seas, the more time I have to work on my blog and suppress all lesser countries.

Keol was right when he said Robert Mugabe was the best thing that ever happened to Zimbabwe. I don't think we Americans should worry about such things when nearly one tenth of one percent of our citizens live in hunger. Only one fourth of their population is starving to death. That is not a gringo's problem: even if that gringo is African-American.

I can't believe I didn't vote for Bush after all, he is our chimp after all. Living in a country where I can voice my opinion about the ineptness of our leader isn't a good thing! It is miserable compared to living in a country where I can blame other people for their mistakes. I hate taking responsibility for a nation that elected a moron to power. Let us blame France for bribing select interest groups in order to get him in power, only to trick him into foreign policy blunders on the grandest scale. That is the kind of country we need.

Why should we send aid to Tsunami victims, forgive debts in Africa, or send peace keeping forces to other countries? They don't want our money and they don’t want us there. They are much better off with people like Mugabe and Sadaam. What were we thinking on that one? As Keol so brilliantly pointed out, people don't want money. Everyone in every non-capitalistic society would be happy to do nothing and let the government handle every aspect of their daily lives. Eastern Europe is in a state of poverty and corruption, not because of a failed communist experiment, but because the US is only concerned in cell phones and reality TV.

Keol is so indelibly correct in all his arguments I think America should resort back to the isolationist strategy that made possible both World Wars. Let us lay back in our easy chairs, sip lemonade on our porches with our trash free streets and let the work be done off shore. Until whoever wants to conquer us rolls in. They will find a nation of highly articulate self-aware people who can't change an oil filter but maintain wonderful Web sites.

I almost forgot about our unquenchable desire for war and conquest. I would be in my cage and my uniquely American character trait of war lust would fulminate inside me. How could I be so stupid that I needed Keol to help me see reality? I would say to our new communist over lords,

"Are we so different? Is your inferior brain any different from mine? The answer is yes, now come here so I can hit it with a mallet.

I was just kidding about that. You and Keol have shown me movies about American war lust but why don't we sit down and I will show you a softer side of America. Then... Blam! That's not a projector; it's a spinning blade shooter. Bwaa hahaha. Okay, I guess that wouldn't work now that you know...

But did you ever try to extend me the hand of peace? If you did, I would rip it off and eat it."

In conclusion: Keol, will you be our next leader, oh enlightened one?
Yes I will...my good ol\' servant!
written by Guest, August 08, 2005
Don't forget....I Am Your Master… Yesterday, Today and Forever. So warship me all you want!

Seriously now…enough said! However, it seems you have somewhat of an obscured vision as to why the entire world community has certain negative perceptions of the United States (please no jealousy argument – it has been over used):

1) Historical facts…The US is the only nation in the world that for the past 100 and some years, has been involved in some type of war, covert operation and the like. Dirty deeds.

2) Democracy… The US has no patent rights on that principle. In fact, the US is not what it is crack-up to be. Freedom huh? In America, freedom is directly correlated to the size of your wallet! The rich can murder someone and walk free (i.e. OJ Simpson), or, the poor shoplifts a 50 cents items and is sentenced to 5 years in prison (actual case in Tennessee). Let’s don’t even bring the so called “Patriotic Act,” because your freedom has been seriously reduced my friend. Democracy…riiight. Please, don’t kid yourself!

3) Loan Forgiveness…Come again!!!! Most indebted nations (98% of them!) to the world-bank are still paying on interest alone, the principal borrowed has long been gone. How much profit does your greed want? 1000%, perhaps 1000000%. Pleeease, have mercy on your fellow human beings!

4) The US is so serious about controlling WMDs. Interesting enough, the only country that has unleashed the killing of thousands in Japan during WWII, with two consecutive atomic bombs. Is that the moral stance you stand on?


These are just some items that came to mind…If one digs a little deeper, it would use up all the available storage space in the Brazzil.com’s web servers. Accept, the US is out of step with the majority of the world community…To commit an error is human, to insist on it, it is plainly stupid!

Good day,

keol

PS Enough...I am back to work!


Re: Why should we send aid ...
written by Guest, August 08, 2005
So that the aid that is sent to these Countries can be "kicked Back" into the coffers of Corporations that helped put George W Bush into office, which money will then be kicked back into some political campaign account, to elect another George W Bush into office to do the same thing over again!!
...
written by Guest, August 08, 2005
In the Words of the village idiot George W Bush, I will call this transferrance of wealth "Circleeur Graft!
Re: what are yankees good for!
written by Guest, August 08, 2005
Very good assessment of the Yankee!

There is hope for you continued survival.

A good book to read about America's current Imperial ambitions is called: "Sorrows of Empire," by Chalmers Johnson
Re: To the maggot ...
written by Guest, August 08, 2005
Six headed weasel!!!
What\'s up with Lula\'s face?
written by Guest, August 08, 2005
He looks like Captain Morgan on that picture...

Harrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr!
Anna Banana
written by Guest, August 11, 2005
Don't feed these schizophrenic communists! They make Micheal Jackson look like an ordinary guy!
...
written by Guest, August 13, 2005
It's not nice to monkey around with the "JACKO."
...
written by Guest, August 13, 2005
What ever happened to Bubbles?

You know the Chimp!

And don't say he morphed into George W Bush!!
James Stolarczyk
written by Guest, August 14, 2005
You all need to stop responding to "keol" you are only encouraging his rant and insulting many good Americans and Brasilians in the process. What blows my mind is how all the left wing, peace,love, one world community, it takes a village types, are so quick to degrade and defame those with whom you disagree. And I am not refer to "keol" only. Calling names, using outlandish rethoric and degrading entire peoples is unbecoming and does not speak highly of anyone. I love Brasil, its people, its culture and especially it's football. Having lived there and in other third world countries, Brasil has great potential. Look at India, it is fast becoming a regional power second only to China and Japan. Brasil has that same potential, if they only stopped blame everyone else for their problems.
Dear James Stolarczyk:
written by Guest, August 15, 2005
“Using Outlandish Rhetoric And Degrading Entire Peoples” …That’s An American Specialty!

I Guess You Must Be An Experiment In Artificial Stupidity. f**k Off!

keol
keol\'s sexual inadequecy
written by Guest, April 07, 2006
But we love watching keol's sexual inadequecy express itself as political diarrhea.

The above poster must be right on at least two counts
robert mugabe of zimbabwe
written by Guest, April 07, 2006
Is a stupid, evil n****r who is starving millions.
...
written by Guest, April 07, 2006
and keol sucks him off
...
written by Guest, April 07, 2006
keol only sucks out his a*****e - exam his postings
online directory main
written by Guest, April 26, 2006
hello
written by caroline, August 16, 2007
i am caroline dickson looking for penpals from all over the world,

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack