Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083339

Who's Online

We have 638 guests online



Nowadays, the US Doesn't Even Need to Meddle in Brazil to Get Its Due PDF Print E-mail
2005 - November 2005
Written by Carlos Chagas   
Wednesday, 02 November 2005 18:49

Brazilian President Lula depicted as Uncle SamRumors that Lula's 2002 presidential campaign got money from foreign countries are old news. There was talk in Congress and also from intelligence sources that Libya's  leader Muammar Gadafi sent help to the PT in 2002, through companies of his country, which were interested in investing in the Brazilian Northeast. There was also talk, about the Colombia's Farc and Taiwan, in China. No one had mentioned Cuba, however.

"Follow the money"

The devil is that Cubans, Libyans, Colombians and Chinese were all duped and made a serious mistake. They lost their investments if they imagined that by donating millions of dollars they would see a president in opposition to the United States in the Brazilian government. They must all be feeling regretful since Lula turned into neoliberalism's most faithful follower. Fidel Castro should ask for his money back and then apply it in the industrialization of his own country instead. After all, the island is no consumer's paradise.

The irony is that the United States, this time,  did not meddle in the Brazilian politics. Neither the CIA nor the American multinationals sent a miserable cent to the PT campaign, in contrast to the millions sent for destabilizing the João Goulart government in the 60s and promoting the military regime.

In 2002, for fear of Lula, Washington saved some good money. And even profited handsomely with the current economic policy, of religious payment of the interests of a debt that has already been paid a thousand times.

History has such contradictions. We have paid a thousand times the USA investment in the establishment of the military governments. Poor Cubans, Libyans, Colombians and Chinese, if they really sent money, they were left in the lurch.

The charges are very serious. If they are substantiated, they might force the ruling Workers Party to close shop through judicial means.  Opposition legislators might also bring back the proposal to impeach the President. Such a move won't be easy, however, since we seem to have only testimonial evidence.

From what magazine Veja has published, Cuba's money came in whiskey and rum boxes, imported by the Cuban embassy in Brasília. In so being, the solution is to follow the money, that is, follow the money, if not from its origin at least through its trajectory.

It will have been changed by some doleiro (illegal dollar dealer) or deposited in some account overseas. If it is true, someone will have left traces that cannot be erased. If it is a lie the role of victim will very well fit the President who will try re-election. And if things stay the way they are, that's our bad luck, because nobody can take this festival of speculations, denials and charges anymore. 

A Fools Country

A long time ago the Lone Ranger was created and became a big hero. He had a friend called Tonto (in Portuguese the word means fool) a legitimate Indian, with a feather on his head and everything else.

Years went by and the Lone Ranger became old and fat. He might even have died although it may always reappear in one of those Hollywood blockbusters. 

The real winner was Tonto who has multiplied and even quit being an Indian. He never fails. Let's make a comparison: the Lone Ranger is the neoliberalism, the Tontos are all those who attack us while defending neoliberalism. 

The most recent of them just showed up this weekend, in an article in which he wrote that without a strong reduction in public expenditures, in a few years Brazil will become economically unviable. 

Which public expenditures, paleface? The highways have become a pothole field. The railroads that were not wiped out by the State have vanished. The government spends way more in publicity than in basic sanitation. Nobody thinks about building a new hydroelectric, what makes us anticipate another national blackout in a few years.

Our ports have become inadequate to let pass the products for export. Budget curtailments brought back foot and mouth disease to our animals, and tuberculosis, to our men, women and children.

The State has no money to invest in public safety. The Armed Forces are systematically left to die an inglorious death. The favelas (shantytown) grow disproportionately.  Public hospitals were turned into slums and the public schools will soon establish the fifth shift.

All of this means that the government is not investing enough. Plans to cut public expenditures even more might be a dream of Finance Minister Antônio Palocci and company, but such measure very soon will lead us to social disintegration.

In an effort to save the Lone Ranger, who is already dead, they are turning Brazil into a country of Tontos...

Carlos Chagas writes for the Rio’s daily Tribuna da Imprensa and is a representative of the Brazilian Press Association, in Brasília. He welcomes your comments at carloschagas@hotmail.com.

Translated from the Portuguese by Arlindo Silva.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (23)Add Comment
Chagas is Neofascist!
written by Guest, November 03, 2005

Nothing more fascist than a typical Brazilian socialist. Nothing more socialist than a typical Brazilian fascist.

Whether you think Chagas is, one thing is for sure: He is against the economic experiences of the most developed countries in the world.

He is a sad picture of the xenophobic nationalist, anti-free-market mentality, shared by 99,9% of the political elites in Brazil.



...
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
"Which public expenditures, paleface? " Come on, unless you've been living under a rock, you know that the vast majority of Brazilian revenue goes to fund public pensions (and it's getting worse). That's the main reason there is so little money for infrastucture and social programs such as public health and education. Until that changes, there will reason to expect that anything in those areas is going to improve.
...
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
US infrastructure and economic power grew because of massive public expenditures such as Panama Canal, TVA, interstate highways. The US middle class grew when it was the last producer standing after WW2.Even more economic diversity ensued when it was not in free trade agreements, when unions were strong, and when there wa s strong industrial base. It also grew when the government implemented a system of income tax which could fund all these programs. The great strides in what made the USA a world power was not attrributed to free trade internationally but free commerce within the country to make a strong domestic economy. The current FTAA will only be an obsticle for smart growth. It will only deepen class divisions, and it will make large corporations wealthier at the expense of public spending and tax revenue. Use the USA as an example to build your economy but don't use the propaganda version. Don't be forced to sign agreements that you know are not fair and don't allow bankers to determine how far your country can climb.
You really know a lot
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
There is absolutely nothing on his text against "the economic experiences of the most developed countries in the world". Where you got that from, we are still about to find out.
And the political elites in Brazil are the PFL and PSDB. During the eight years of F.H. Cardosos' government, these conservative right wing elites promoted the abrupt opening of Brazil's market without preparing the country first, all in concordance with the Washington Consensus and to the delight of the popes of neoliberalism. Lula and the PT are carrying it on.
Neoliberalism is something that the rich countries shove upon poor and developing countries while not applying to their own. These is especially true when regarding Europe and Japan and not anymore in the US, where, with the Bush administration, neoliberalism has been adopted and the result was an big increase in the distance that separates the poor and the rich. The convervative, right wing and oligarchic political elites of Brazil (as well as the rest of LatAm) have for almost a century now ruled the country and never once disobbeyed the United Stateds wishes, not because it is submissive, but because they share the same interests. Now, why someone from abroad claims that "99,9% of the political elites in Brazil" have a "xenophobic nationalist, anti-free market mentality" and insinuates that these elites are the enemies of Washington, that I will probably die before I understand.
Seriously, if you trully want to understand the country, I recommend "Raízes do Brazil", by Sergio Buarque de Holanda and "História do Brasil", by prof. Bóris Fausto. I think you can find them in English if you look by the author's names.
And by the way, fascist is how you call an extreme right wing. The term fits better George W. Bush with his ethnocentric cruzade than a radical left wing such as Carlos Chagas.
f**k the imperialist gringos and the IMF
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
f**k the imperialist gringos and the IMF and World Bank -

all you neoliberal right wing racist oligarchic gringo loving nut blancos - here is the response from the campesions and socialist and real people friendly masses - "get lost and go and live in nazi germany".

the gringo imperialists and their lackeys in the form of brazil's neo-liberal and blanco oligarchy have done nothing short but exploit the poor, the campesinos, the indigenous, the black, the pardo, and other peoples of color for over 513 years.

all your policy includes is simply cutting taxes for the rich even more and make the rich even more richer and the poor even poorer than they are! and then you bastards support right wing oligarchic and destructive and racist government and counterrevolutionaries in countries against left leaning, people loving, and humane comrades and heroes throughout latin america and the world, where socialists win political victories.

well f**k YOU, you imperialists and the oligarchic lackeys of the imperialist gringos.

we needs a marxist, soclialst and communist revolution in brazil and we need to take over all the fazendas and haciendas of the blanco oligarchy and elite, and then redistribute the land amongst the poor campesinos, as comrade joao stedile is doing now with MST, and comrades hugo chavez and comrade evo morales and comrade danioel ortega has done or will be doing in venezuela, bolivia, and nicaragua respectively,

viva la revolucion! viva fidel castro! viva marxism!

down with right wing racist gringo imperialism! down with the IMF and the racist and exploitary World Bank! down with evil and capitalistic big corporations, which pillage the nature, the people, and the land and the waters and the airs for their own corporate greed and interests!
re: f**k the imperialist gringos and the
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
Man i am not any of the things you describe...but you know what......you sound so stupid...i am surprised you can write in english
PPPPPP
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
Proper prior preparation prevents pisspoor perfromance....

Sorry but brasil is full of it!
Why dont you face the music?
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
"here is the response from the campesions and socialist and real people friendly masses"

Your just not educated and smart enough!
amused
written by Guest, November 03, 2005
Laughable the defense of the campesinos and the idiots who follow marxism and such. Just look at the countries under capitalism and compare them with the countries in ex iron curtain. I wonder why they changed if things were so nice overthere. You have shown your level of intelligence by defecating on the paper as demonstrated by your language. You useful idiots want to get to power and then screw those you cheated in the way up as clearly demonstrated by PT and the likes of Jose Dirceu and so on. Go back to your hole you piece of comunist s**t and stop making such a bad representation of a political approach that could otherwise have some theoretical merits.
...
written by Guest, November 04, 2005
Well, I am not sure what is the model for a marxist revolution but the Left does have a point of the failure of neoliberalism in Brazil. The promise was to end hyperinflation yet also bring about rapid economic growth. While the conquest of hyperinflation is won the growth part of the equation lacks. To be frank, Brazil's pension system has serious flaws but you can not blame it for the reason the government lacks money. The deficit of the pension system is roughly 38 to 40 billion reais, about 19 billion dollars. In 1994, the debt was roughly 120 billion dollars but 2002 the debt had reached roughly 350 billion dollars! The pension system contributed heavily to this debt but it is clearly the interest rates on the debt that accumulated heavily over the 8 years that caused the rapid escalation of debt. Also, in order to compensate for the high debt increase the government of Cardoso had to hike taxation almost across the board to keep with increased expenditures. The tax rate went up from roughly 26 per cent to 35 percent. No doubt about it, Lula's pension reforms and the governments new role to cut on waste and fraud is needed but the internal debt continues to rise because of the high interest rate policy in place that Lula promised to change but was unsuccessful or refused to change. Now,in an Economist article back in 1999, it talks about the budget deficit being 8 percent and this being the main reason capital was fleeing Brazil since 1998. Yet, as the Economist points of that 8 percent deficit, 7 percent was made of interest payments and not increased government spending. Now, Lula has not changed this because he has decided to stick with stability over any attempt to alter the economic situation. So, I feel like my beliefs lie in a restricted govt intervention in the economy yet the neoliberal concept of trade especially promoting exports is essential to long-term economic growth and maintaining democratic institutions is also essential to long-term development. I guess I am not Marxist yet I believe that their economic policy is wrong they were successful in land reform, providing basic education to their populace so overall it might be a failure but not a total one. Also, although Cuba maintains a very poor and desperate country that people want to flee the US embargo has a lot to do with its economic failures although you cant only blame the US.
...
written by Guest, November 04, 2005
Imperialist gringos? Meddling? You are so delusional! At least your ignorance is amusing.
Anyone one for communism?
written by Guest, November 04, 2005
After all that we have seen in the past regarding Communism, Marxism etc we know one thing Brazil does not need it. What happened to the Soviet union? and all the countries that pursued it? When I hear people saying Vive la revolution, they obviously do not know history or understand that this wonderful concept of equality goes out of the window as soon as it's put into practice. You just change one lot of Imperialists for red ones.

It's interesting listening to old communists who served under Stalin, how they see la revolution....

Does Brazil really want that??



Yankees Not Welcome Anywhere!
written by Guest, November 05, 2005
You planted the seeds....now bear its fruits.

George Bush...The #1 Terrorist in the World, down with the USA!
Bodhi963@tpg.com.ua
written by Guest, November 05, 2005
It would good to see Brazil and South America prosper
I think you are right about rejecting Communism. Adopting a Marxist model is simply trading one form of exploitation for an even more sinister one.
see for some inside information on communsim, Any one who has followed the persecution of Falun Gong will know the tempest that Brazil would be inviting upon itself if it took this path

http://ninecommentaries.com/
there are other alternatives. try this

interesting reading about Neo-Libs in South America

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/09/1526251

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5428.htm

www http://globaldialoguecenter.co...53b072cdf8


www.proutistuniversal.org
Bodhi963@tpg.com.ua
written by Guest, November 05, 2005
It would good to see Brazil and South America prosper
I think you are right about rejecting Communism. Adopting a Marxist model is simply trading one form of exploitation for an even more sinister one.
see for some inside information on communsim, Any one who has followed the persecution of Falun Gong will know the tempest that Brazil would be inviting upon itself if it took this path

http://ninecommentaries.com/
there are other alternatives. try this

interesting reading about Neo-Libs in South America

http://www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=04/11/09/1526251

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5428.htm

www http://globaldialoguecenter.co...53b072cdf8


www.proutistuniversal.org
...
written by Guest, November 05, 2005
Good Lord the posters above are all complete loonies. Completely moronic. Truely amazing.
Do you tjhink it would be better for bra
written by brasilnow, November 13, 2005
Brasil and Debt
written by brasilnow, November 13, 2005
Do you think it would be good for Brasil to default on foreign debt? I would bet ..no..because Brasil would hurt itself the most short term ..and long term what would be accomplished...look at Argentina 3 years of hell and still going strong..Hell that is...go there live there..you will not want the same for Brasil.. but of course from the safety of a newspaper or TV
it doesn´t matter what is happening in Argentina..but if it happens like that here...Argentina had to default Brasil doesn´t have too...just pay the nmoneyt back and don´t get into debt again...but that is impossible for governments ...right or left
\"Gingos Go Home\"
written by Guest, November 17, 2005
"Bush Go Home! ...can we come with you? ;-)
ghana_5@yahoo.com
written by Guest, November 20, 2005
i need a card number to byr peleras
thanks to u......... byeeeeeeeeee
djpaaatgh@yahoo.com
written by Guest, November 20, 2005
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
i need a card number to byr peleras
thanks to u......... byeeeeeeeeee
ghana_5@yahoo.com
written by Guest, November 20, 2005
GUEST DO YOU LOVE ME..............BY PANFORD
respond this post
written by EsperanzaClemons27, June 20, 2010
I guess that to receive the lowest-rate-loans.com from creditors you should present a great motivation. But, one time I have got a term loan, just because I was willing to buy a bike.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack