Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33088443

Who's Online

We have 475 guests online



It's Time Brazil Leave Its Pothole-Filling Policy and Strive for Greatness PDF Print E-mail
2007 - September 2007
Written by Cristovam Buarque   
Tuesday, 11 September 2007 09:48

Street kids in Brazil Recently I visited the Cariri region, in the interior of Ceará State, to take part in marches for the "Educação Já" Campaign. While visiting the region, I listened to and conversed with the people and participated in demonstrations calling for a revolution in Brazilian education. At one event, State Deputy Ferreira Aragão, a great speaker, said, "We do not merely want to grow; we want to be great."

In honor of the "Semana da Pátria," we should reflect upon the difference between growth and greatness and try to understand how Brazil settled for wanting to grow and stopped wanting to be a great country.

To grow, for example, is to increase the national revenue; to become great is to distribute it. To grow is to increase the number of jails; to become great is to have no need of them.

To grow is to see the population increase, to have more children born each year; to become great is to have them in school, not in the streets, and to have all the schools - whether for the rich or for the poor, in large or in small cities - of the same quality.

To grow is to have more automobiles in the streets; to become great is to have transit that flows comfortably and without traffic jams. To grow is to uproot trees to use the wood; to become great is to produce while protecting nature.

Paradoxically, Brazil is growing while remaining small.

Our cities have grown, but, due to the growth in violence, pollution, and family breakdown, they have not become great. Our political parties are also growing but they are not becoming great since they lack a cause to mobilize their militants, a banner of struggle to carry forward.

And that banner of struggle should be to make Brazil a great country and not a country that is growing. To grow is to increase the number of families who receive the Bolsa-Família; to become great is to reduce the number of families who need the Bolsa-Família until there are none.

What is worse, we do not perceive the difference between growth and becoming great. We want growth but we are not seeking greatness.

There is no greatness when a good school is not guaranteed to 82% of our children. There is no greatness in commemorating the school enrollment of 97% of the children as long as we do not concern ourselves with the remainder, who, at the very beginning of their life, are not attending school.

There is no better demonstration of poverty than the fact that only a third of our young people finish secondary school, only half of these with an education of reasonable quality. We may have even had some growth but there was no greatness.

Although no one can be blamed, it is necessary to assume the responsibility. And all of us must act to combat the mediocrity of our project for growth. I have called upon the Federal Senate to reassume our historical obligation: that we be the house of Congress where the greatness of Brazil is constructed.

That we leave aside the everyday mediocrity, the agenda of growth and of filling potholes, and that we begin to reflect upon our culture, our history, our future, our greatness.

The National Congress needs to stimulate this discussion because our greatness is a federal question. We need to leave aside the plans and measures to make us grow; we should discuss structural reforms so that we will become a great country by revolutionizing education, by eliminating the waiting lines in the hospitals, by building sustainable development, by designing a project for a great nation.

Growth is not a synonym of greatness. The time has come for us, the leaders of this country, to go beyond that mediocre vision of growth, to stop believing that growth is a synonym of being great, when, in fact, it is not. The Seventh of September, Brazilian Independence Day, is a good moment to reflect upon this.

Cristovam Buarque has a Ph.D. in economics. He is a PDT senator for the Federal District and was Governor of the Federal District (1995-98) and Minister of Education (2003-04). He is the current president of the Senate Education Commission. Last year he was a presidential candidate. You can visit his homepage - www.cristovam.com.br - and write to him at mensagem-cristovam@senado.gov.br

Translated from the Portuguese by Linda Jerome - LinJerome@cs.com.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (12)Add Comment
It's Time Brazil Leave Its Pothole-Filling Policy
written by João da Silva, September 12, 2007
You are right,Senator. Lots of us are sick and tired of the "Tapa Buraco" policy of almost 99.9% our politicos. You are one of the rare ones who mentioned about it. You know as well as I do that we have to build things to last for a long time (not to forget the regular maintainance).Our method of building highways is a typical "Tapa Buraco" operation,in spite of our engineers being very good. Why not build god ones that will last.

BTW, if you need any suggestions, we will be around in this blog.
João
written by The guest, September 12, 2007
"I have called upon the Federal Senate to reassume our historical obligation: that we be the house of Congress where the greatness of Brazil is constructed."

João, does Cristovam Buarque bring these issues up for debate in the Brazilian Congress?
The Guest
written by João da Silva, September 12, 2007
Yes, he does,though his colleagues in the congress are more worried about short term issues that interest them. I am a bit of a suspect, when I say that he is very intelligent and honest. The problem is : How the heck is going to compete with thieves like Renan or Sarney? He does have lots of respect in the academic community,here in SC and RS.

However, I think that Chris should be more audacious and talk about other issues, besides just the education. In the last elections for the Prez, there were two good candidates.Chris and Geraldo.A pity, neither of them was elected.I guess they were too scholarly and gentlemen. BTW, Chris was a good governor of DF.



João
written by The guest, September 12, 2007
"The problem is : How the heck is going to compete with thieves like Renan or Sarney? "

By tying his education mantra to the economy of the country and taking his message directly to the people if he is not getting a meaningful audience in congress. He will have to explain it in a very simplistic way so that the masses he is trying to reach will understand. He will need to show them how lack of education is hurting their very exsistance. It is never to early to start being a presidential candidate. He may never be president, but he may get recogition for effecting meaningful change.
100 % of Brazil State Deputies ......
written by ch.c., September 12, 2007
....say the same as Aragao !
But no one deliver what they are supposed to do....with their great promises.
Lula doesnt do any better, but is even better in promises...promises...promises...promises !

Good and logical ideas should be fulfilled and not just talked about and promised.

Easier said and promised than done is the sad Brazilian reality !

What is sure, a promise....doesnt cost anything....in Brazil !
It just brings more votes to those who promise but never deliver.
To Joao "Chris was a good governor of DF. "
written by ch.c., September 12, 2007
Such a great governor that the teachers in that state were the best paid in the country.
They get one salary from the state as ALL teachers in others states (not necessarily the same amount) PLUS A SALARY...FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.
And they were the only ones getting salaries from 2 sources.
You may say this is good.
But my answer is that it reflects how in Brazil, the cake is shared by a minority of people, and the residues by the majority !

How do I know and be sure of what I mentioned above ?
SIMPLE :
Clearly explained in an article published on this site around 18-24 months ago......by your favored politician, Christovam Buarque.....HIMSELF !


smilies/grin.gif smilies/wink.gif
...
written by João da Silva, September 14, 2007
by your favored politician, Christovam Buarque


At least,my favorite politician voted to boot yours (Renan) out of his office smilies/angry.gif
...
written by nesnej, September 16, 2007
All of what Buarque says here is true but no one can really put an action plan together to change things, that is why Brazil is the way it is. There are a lot of people who are good at complaining but very few who are good at organizing to change things, which is a much more difficult task. It is difficult enough in an organized society, I don't know if it could be done here, should we give up hope?
Yes.
written by Ric, September 16, 2007
And please find another metaphor, because the Cearenses have a long way to go yet in filling in potholes.
I don't know why I even asked
written by nesnej, September 16, 2007
Of course we should give up hope. Anyone who doesn't will drive themselves insane....
...
written by João da Silva, September 16, 2007
I don't know why I even asked


Because,you are "LOST"
...
written by Adriana A., December 06, 2007

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack