Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33088412

Who's Online

We have 502 guests online



Brazil Gave Away World's Second Largest Mining Complex. The People Want it Back PDF Print E-mail
2007 - November 2007
Written by Eugenio Fernández Vázquez   
Tuesday, 27 November 2007 19:00

A CVRD train In a plebiscite organized by 200 social organizations from Brazil, almost four million people demanded that the CVRD (Companhia Vale do Rio Doce), the second largest mining company in the world, be put back in the hands of the Brazilian government.

The Landless Rural Workers' Movement (MST), the Unified Workers' Federation (CUT), and about 200 other social organizations celebrated the first week of September (the week of Brazilian Independence Day), with a plebiscite that would rebuild the sovereignty of the country almost two centuries after its independence. Then, on October 8, they released the results. It was a resounding victory for those opposed to privatization.

Referendum polls were open from September 1-9. Citizens were asked whether they wanted the Vale do Rio Doce Company, CVRD, (or "a Vale" as it is known in Brazil) to remain in private hands or be returned to the control of the state and the Brazilian people 10 years after its privatization. Of the 3,729,000 people who participated in the vote, 94% checked the "no" box, stating that they wanted "a Vale" to be returned to public control.

A Bargain

The issue decided by almost four million citizens is not a banal one. The CVRD is the second most prosperous mining company in the world in terms of its commercial value. Worth approximately US$ 100 billion, it is the largest iron ore producer in the world and is present in some way on all five continents.

According to its website, in Brazil alone, the Vale controls one-third of all goods entering and leaving the country by sea through the six ports that it owns. It also owns 10,000 kilometers of railroads and transports 16% of all goods traveling by train within Brazil.

Furthermore, the CVRD owns several power plants that supply electricity only to the company itself, and, according to various allegations, it has been able to increase its cost-effectiveness by receiving energy subsidies. It is one of the leading aluminum mines in Latin America and it owns Inco, one of the largest mines in Canada.

The company was founded in 1942 during the government of Getúlio Vargas. When it was privatized in 1997, it was already one of the largest companies in the world, worth approximately US$ 40 billion. However, the government of Fernando Henrique Cardoso sold it for a mere tenth of that amount in a transaction that, according to those opposed to the sale, was plagued with irregularities.

It Is Up to the Courts

Besides the sale of the Vale for a price much lower than it was actually worth, lawyer Fábio Konder Comparato, professor at the University of São Paulo, says that among the many other irregularities is the fact that the legal requirements for justifying the alienation of state property in areas of public interest were not complied with.

"The order of alienation of control of CVRD was limited to declaring that the 'destatization' of the company is incorporated in the objectives of the National Destatization Plan." However, no justification was given for the function of this plan, nor in what way it would contribute to the wellbeing of the country.

Konder Comparato, along with the other lawyers advocating on behalf the hundreds of claims against the sale of the Vale that are still in the courts, believe that these two facts alone would warrant that the Judiciary annul the sale.

But there is more. In an interview with the InterPress news agency, João Pedro Stédile, leader of the MST, stated that "the firm that assessed the value of CVRD for Brazil's National Economic and Social Development Bank (BNDES) was the same one that advised the Bradesco bank," which is one of CVRD's current owners. For the peasant leader, "This means that the appraisers advised both the vendor and the buyer."

Some of the courts agreed with Stédile and his colleagues. For example, an appellate court judge already issued a sentence on one of the claims in December 2005. He determined that fraud was committed during the sale of CVRD and that the sale should therefore be annulled. This was a positive outcome.

However, those seeking to have the Vale returned to the control of the Brazilian people and the state are aware that "the next steps could take years," especially as there are still several claims that need to be resolved.

PT Says Yes, Government Says No

Even before the MST, the CUT, and the other campaign participants had announced the poll results and voters gave a resounding "no" to the privatization of the CVRD, the plebiscite itself had already provoked several reactions that demonstrated a gap between the political class and its grassroots, as well as between the government and its supporting organizations.

Among the actions that showed strong support, the Cry of the Excluded, the widespread demonstration held annually across Brazil, was carried out in tandem with the plebiscite on this occasion. According to the organizers, a million participants mobilized nationwide.

Furthermore, the plenary session of the Third Congress of Workers Party (PT), (the party to which Brazilian president Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva belongs), also joined in the effort. Some of the top leaders of the party even supported the poll directly. For example, the Governor of the state of Pará, Ana Júlia Carepa, voted in the plebiscite.

However, not all the leaders of the PT wholly share in the idea of taking strong actions to reclaim the Vale for Brazilians. In an interview with the Folha de S. Paulo newspaper on September 2 (the day that the polls began), PT Party President Ricardo Berzoini, said that the plebiscite "is an action on the part of social movements supported by the PT, but this does not mean that the results are directly associated with the party."

President Lula agreed with him. During the plebiscite, he stated that "any discussion on the topic of the CVRD shall not reach my desk." He went on to say that this issue "shall not be discussed in the government as there is a firm act of law that the government shall respect," despite the legal actions taken by several of Konder Comparato's colleagues. Essentially, this means that the party in power is for renationalization of the CVRD, but the government is not.

Not an Easy Task

The task of returning the Vale back into the hands of all Brazilians will be a long and difficult one. CUT National President Artur Henrique acknowledged that after the plebiscite, "a new phase of the struggle" would begin. However, he also observed that the Brazilian people have once again "denounced the concepts of privatization and submission to imperialism."

This could turn out to be a great success. The fact that 3.7 million voters were mobilized with very few resources is in itself a victory. However, the opponents that have to be confronted are powerful ones. One only needs to look at the CVRD's holdings structure.

For example, since September 2003, the Japanese corporation Mitsui, one of the most powerful on the Japanese archipelago, has held 15% of Valepar shares, the shareholders group that controls 53% of the CVRD holdings' vote.

Furthermore, as published in the newspaper A Jornada and based on data published on the Vale's own website, a fourth of CVRD's ordinary capital is in the hands of foreigners. Only 7% is owned by Brazilians and the state barely controls another 7%. Almost two-thirds of its total capital is reliant on the stock markets in New York and Brazil.

However, this does not scare the MST, the CUT, nor the millions of Brazilians that have done their part to ensure Brazil's independence by demanding that it be true and complete. This year's Cry of the Excluded slogan, a wordplay on the Vale name, summarized well how they feel: "Isto Não Vale!" (This will not do!

Eugenio Fernández Vázquez is a freelance journalist and Americas Policy Program contributor (www.americaspolicy.org).

Translated from "Pueblo brasileño dice "No" a la minería privada
by Andreea Modrea.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (10)Add Comment
funny
written by hb, November 28, 2007

People that pay attention to the noise MST makes are idiots. This is the usual stupidity you see across the world though. Commodity companies are greedy, commodity companies are this or that. Commodity companies like Vale hadn't been doing anything for ages. China and India increased demand causing commodity prices to skyrocket, thus creating the current commodity boom, and all of the sudden people think this is the norm.
Again, this is the usual case of ignorant people without an argument making enough noise to grab the attention and support of other ignorant people. It's just how it is, it happens everywhere, and the best thing to do is to disregard such clear and evident ignorance.
and the countries where Vale......
written by ch.c., November 28, 2007
bought other companies such as INCO and many others.....ALSO WANT THEIR COMPANIES BACK TO THEIR COUNTRY.
Of course, these compaanies were also bought to cheap.
And of course these countries, similar to the MST & NGOs also believe they should get back their companies....but obviously not pay back the multi billion and billion of US$ they received !

Fair deal....using the MST common sense !

smilies/grin.gif smilies/cheesy.gif smilies/grin.gif smilies/cheesy.gif
MST
written by jakob, November 29, 2007
MST... Give me a break. From what I've seen it's a bunch of loosers invading private properties, thinking that's absolutely "normal" and "fair". And after the shootings, they wonder why the owner hired pistoleiros to drive them off his lands.

MST is one of the most obnoxious things I've seen in Brazil. It seems, however, that the Brazilian government gives some legitimacy to this "movement".
Jakob
written by João da Silva, November 29, 2007
MST is one of the most obnoxious things I've seen in Brazil. It seems, however, that the Brazilian government gives some legitimacy to this "movement".


That is because the government has a strong electoral base in MST. Not only in MST, but in CUT and UNE also. Since you mentioned (in another thread) that you are an European and a new comer to Brasil, you may not know what CUT and UNE are. But you will discover soon!!
If it happened...
written by me, November 30, 2007
If it happened that CVRD were nationalized, one would see a capital flight from Brazil of historic proportions, as foreign investors became concerned about the stability of their other investments. This would have the effect of wrecking the Brazilian economy for a period of some years.
...
written by aes, November 30, 2007
No statute of limitations. And when the State declares there is no private property and comes to take your property, because it was sold too cheaply and there were irregularities and and and? What then? We have Chavezian economics. Everything is owned by the State by the People. Except the Indiginous Natives, we wont go back that far and return their land. Hell their not even Brazilians.
...
written by Eduardo C., December 04, 2007
Majority capital?? smilies/smiley.gif smilies/wink.gif Gringo lunático e burro
What a bunch of nonsense!
written by Marcos Carvalho, December 05, 2007
It's a shame that people still believe these ludicrous conspiracy theories that the state somehow 'gave away' CVRD. The State did what it had to, the Brazilian government like most governments was ill equipped to administrate CVRD. Today the company is a success story because of privatization and contributes more to Brazlian society in taxes, jobs and infrastrtuctural investments than it ever did when it was a state-run company. Back then, all CVRD ever did was suck money out of tax payers' pockets, and line politicians' pockets with it. The people funding and leading this plebiscite are being used by those same politicians that profitted from CVRD when it was in the State's hands.
Marcos Carvalho
written by João da Silva, December 05, 2007
It's a shame that people still believe these ludicrous conspiracy theories that the state somehow 'gave away' CVRD.


Sorry Marcos, it was not a conspiracy, but dishonesty and greed on the part of politicians from PSDB,PFL,PMDB, etc; They started the whole process right from 1985 and FHC consummated it.If you really look at the figures for which the state owned companies (including CVRD) were sold, you would understand what I am saying.

In general, the strategy was to kill a state owned company by filling up with the cronies that mismanaged it,show to the society that it is a white elephant and sell it for a song.

Just wait for some more surprises during the next 3 years .
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, December 11, 2007
- In general, the strategy was to kill a state owned company by filling up with the cronies that mismanaged it,show to the society that it is a white elephant and sell it for a song. -

How many times, in how many places do we see the same thing? Enterprises run by the state performing as personal fiefdoms of the politicians and their cronies. Many of these enterprises are monopolies ensured to amass huge profits. This is not only in Brazil. US government cannot run post office or trains, but we allow them to run social services. If they can't run a company that should not be able to lose money, how in the world are they supposed to be trusted to operate money for people who have no voice in society?

The answer is not to sell the operation, but to 'outsource' the peoples work to professional managers, and definitely not to the brothers, cousins, and friends. Two of the most corrupt agencies in the US are the Bureau of Indian Affairs and the Bureau of Land Management. It does not matter which party is in power, BIA and BLM put their best 'money friends' to run these agencies. It goes on and on and the US people are powerless to change.

Lacking professional management should not be the excuse to 'give away' the rightful inheritance of the people. There are many professional management companies to ensure profitable operations. Too bad that politicos and their cronies are allowed to run these agencies into the ground and then sell them to friends or outsiders for the 'big payoff'. It is a disgusting practice that surely raises the calls for nationalism and socialism.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack