Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083977

Who's Online

We have 748 guests online



Petrobras: from 23rd to 4th - Lula Gets His Piece of Flesh PDF Print E-mail
2010 - February 2010
Written by Clara Angelica Porto   
Tuesday, 16 February 2010 00:00

Lula laughsThe consulting company on energy, PFC, brought to public official results of an analysis on market value it did on several companies, and Brazilian oil giant Petrobras ranked number 4 among the 50 biggest energy companies of the world. Ahead of Petrobras are PetroChina, Exxon and BHP Billiton.

This is quite an achievement for Petrobras, a company that spent decades being major in Brazil but had very little or no world recognition or even any perspective to reach the status of a global force in the energy industry. Third world it was, third world remained. Or so it was thought. Not too long ago, eight years more precisely, Petrobras ranked number 23, in an analysis done by the very same PFC.

Now things have changed rather drastically. The Brazilian company presented a growth in the value of its shares throughout 2009, of 103%, bigger than any other company in the industry, even the three rated above Petrobras. This is, understandably bringing attention to number 4, more so than the three topping it on the list and PFC uses Petrobras as one of the headlines of the announcement. 

In the last eight years, Petrobras has more than doubled its market value, from 96.8 billion dollars to 199.2 billion. PFC also brought another Brazilian company among the 50 biggest in the energy industry made public, OGX, the oil side of Eike Batista's group. Nothing helps to push a company's value more than having its value officially announced.  Since PFC's report, the price of market shares of Petrobras went sky high.

Not too long ago, only specialists knew about Petrobras but this is no longer true; today, the simplest person looking for good investment options will find that Petrobras is a safe and reliable company to invest in. The Brazilian oil giant has finally made it to the spotlight.  Not just among big people who talk big money, but for anyone with some money to invest. Quite a change.

President Lula da Silva is known for, among other traits, his informal and almost too colloquial speeches. Some say the president has a hard time biting his tongue. Sometimes he might do it just for fun, to shock or even for the pleasure that no matter what, people love and respect him. But sometimes it could be that Lula is just taking pleasure in getting his little piece of flesh, like what happened recently in the state of Pernambuco, northeast Brazil, where Lula was born.

The national press was all over the president, and everyone talked about it for days.  Lula was quoted as saying that, because of the stable economy, Brazil could now speak from the top but that the country spent years being stepped on.

He went on to say that now, being a third world country being treated poorly by world authorities, feels like that happened a long time ago, 'once upon a time,' but it has not been too long since IMF, now with Brazilian money to thrive on, thank you very much, paid official visits to Brazil to discuss the debt and humiliated the Brazilian government with arrogance, by imposing rules and telling them what to do.  

Any Brazilian remembers that and Lula da Silva better than many, because at the time, he was a union leader protesting the ways of the IMF and urging the country not to succumb to the imperialistic manners of the institution and even not to honor the debt, a proposal, which then gave him the image of a radical leftist.  

But time went by and there is nothing like time and circumstance to bring new perspectives and rules to games. As president of Brazil, Lula da Silva, no longer an enraged union leader, but the leader of South America's giant, led to not only paying the debt Brazil had with IMF, as to bringing money to the institution during the economic hardships of last year.

In Pernambuco, Lula rubbed it in, in the very place where he had been born a poor child, saying that "from the humble dog with his tail between his legs" Brazil had become a proud patron. The president seemed to be particularly at-home on that day; his remarks fed the news and many sharp articles, opinions and analysis coming from all sides were written on the recurring theme of 'Lula hits again.'

Lula mentioned the first time he went to Davos, in 2003, when he heard from everyone how Brazil was going to go broken, that inflation would be back and all kinds of pessimistic remarks that would make one think that he was the leader of a country on the road to ruin. Enough to get any new president depressed and, not surprisingly, enough to make one not to forget.

At the end of January Lula was supposed to go to Davos to be honored for his "global statesmanship" for eight years of model leadership. Too bad President Lula da Silva got sick and could not make it to the event in person.

And here I humbly confess to what I really think: I imagine that he was indeed honored and happy but I have a feeling that there, behind the satisfaction of conquering world recognition, Lula is really also getting a kick out of the whole thing. And who can blame him?
"The times, they are a-changing."

Visit www.liciafabio.com.br and read Clara Angelica's column on Revista Lícia



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (16)Add Comment
...
written by hunh?, February 17, 2010
The times they are a changing??? Brazil still has vast inequality of wealth with millions living in dire poverty. Lula finds it easy to boast because an oil firm is doing a booming business? The overall pictures for Brazil still seems troubled, so why all the gloating. Besides Lula's ranting against other countries and boasting of the new "top"position of Brazil is based on the premise that other countries "stepped on" Brazil. Hence, this justifies Lula boasting. What I notice often at this blog is not so much news reporting, but stories that opinion pieces written from a jingoistic perspective, typically with and axe to grind against the US. There is often the assumption that the Americans and other first world people wanted to step on or dominate Brazil, when in fact most Americans don't think much of Brazil, and when they do, it is only with warm regard, wishing them success. Ironically, in contrast, many Brazilians cultivate a bitter resentment against Americans, seemingly blaming them and their government for all the troubles plaguing Brazil when in fact many of their greatest problems (environmental destruction, corruption and graft, bureaucracy, crime, and vast inequality of wealth) are primarily created by Brazilians. None of these particular problems of Brazil are in any way an advantage to the US or other developed nations. These are problems that typically benefit the local elite of Brazil, who by the way, are in no way offer a more fair or moral vision of society as the country grows into an even greater local super power. In fact, they have picked up some of the worst traits of the American elite, greatly exploiting the poor, benefiting from corruption in politics and government. While it is convenient for Lula to rant against developed nations as some kind of evil force that dominates innocent Brazil, I believe Brazil would be served better to look inward at its own promotion of its problems. Also, if Brazil is going to be a real global leader, it needs to tone down the boasting when it succeeds, and stop taking pleasure in the troubles of other developed nations when they falter. When the US fell into a recession, Lula was openly boasting about Brazil being above the poor economic practices of the "blue eyed" people up north. And many of the commentators of this blog celebrated the fall of the US as if it was sinking into utter oblivion. This really highlighted for me the bitter resentment at the heart of so many Brazilians. You mention humility. This would be a true display of humility that is more common of developed nations. Their leaders don't strut around boasting about their success and belittling other countries for failing. This story, like many others on this site, make this blog resemble not a news service, but more a 24 hour-non stop infomercial touting Brazil as an extraordinary paradise.
...
written by Ederson, February 17, 2010
America is a stupid country. It makes so many mistakes and is always overextending itself economically and militarily. It is also one of the few countries where the greatest threat to the health of the poor is obesity! They also spend too much time warring with their politicians and leaders, and they never stop trying to reinvent themselves. Why would anybody want to live there!
Thank God that no matter what happens in and to Brasil, nothing ever really changes, Brasil will always be Brasil.
...
written by hunh?, February 17, 2010
And here I humbly confess to what I really think: I imagine that he was indeed honored and happy but I have a feeling that there, behind the satisfaction of conquering world recognition, Lula is really also getting a kick out of the whole thing.


I know Lula has been popular in Brazil and he has had a certain amount of positive recognition from other world leaders and people. Yet, I suspect the more other nations get to know him, they will not celebrate him so easily. I was shocked when his own party and people were implicated in a scheme involving bags of money paid out for political favors. In the US, this would have likely led to impeachment, and condemnation, and shame for the president, as in the case of Richard Nixon. Yet in Lula's case, he won the next election by a substantial majority, which only showed me that despite the fact that Brazilians decry corruption in politics, they turned a blind eye to the "Mensalao" incident. For him to truly have a sterling reputation worldwide as you claim in this article, he would need to be held to a higher standard of behavior than Brazilians hold him to. I don't follow the news in Brazil much, but recently Lula greatly disappointed me by hugging and courting the Iranian dictator. While the world is clear that Iran intends to use nuclear power for war purposes, and not peaceful purposes, Lula is colluding with the Iranian regime, pretending that Iran only wants to use nuclear power for peaceful purposes. While many Brazilians may believe this nonsense, the world knows this is not true. And any such claims by Lula will only tarnish his reputation on the world stage. Instead of looking at the evidence (underground labs in a vast array of tunnels, reports from spies within the country, etc) collected by various organizations and governments demonstrating that Iran is attempting to develop nuclear weapons, Lula seems content to promote lies and nonsense about the situation, anticipating, I believe, some trade deal that will ensue if sanctions do follow. And like the Mensaloao scandal, Brazilians seem ready to accept whatever fairy tale Lula tells them, despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.
Likewise, Brazilians love to throw it in our face (Americans) that the US supported the military dictatorship, yet they fail to ask how were their own people implicated in supporting the dictatorship. What is the fascist impulse among their own people that would accept such a repressive regime? The US military did not occupy the country in support of the dictatorship, so why did the people go along with this? These are not black and white questions, and they don't allow for simply blaming the EVIL EMPIRE (US) for all its troubles, yet such critiques may address the weakness of democracy seen in Brazil, which tends to turn a blind eye to corruption and accept undemocratic ways.
It's also a bit hypocritical for Lula and Brazilians to denounce the US for supporting the dictatorship 20 years ago, yet today while Iranians are being beaten and tortured in the streets for protesting, Lula hugs and praises the Iranian dictator. Yet, Brazilians love Lula's loud-mouthed tirades against the US, but in fact, in this case, I believe he will only hurt US/Brazil relations. Obama is the most open, diplomatic and multi-lateral president in years. He has been interested in cooperation and reaching out to Brazil, but Lula seems to be shutting down the opportunity to heal past rifts between the north and south.

It is hypocritical to see that Lula, who was a former union boss, does not rant and rail against the Brazilian capitalist who benefit greatly from the vast army of poor peasants who will work for low wages. Instead, he saves his most vitriolic rants for the US and developed countries. He plays the nationalism strategy, which is safest for him: he looks like a hero for saying foul things against the US, which makes many Brazilians think they have arrived as a world player because their president can thumb their nose at the US. But Brazil is on no higher moral plane than the US: they exploit their poor far more intensely in fact. Yet, Lula seems to know that he can US nationalistic jingoism to stay in power and be very popular, yet he hesitates to attack the local elite in the same manner. Nationalism is a popular strategy for deflecting criticism from the government outward on to some projected bad guy, in this case the US. George Bush played this card well when he ranted against the " axis of evil" (Iran, Iraq, and North Korea) and Reagan did no less in ranting against the Soviet Union, yet this is a convenient strategy to righteously unite people against some outside force, while neglecting to look inward at the internal problems of a country. This is a favored strategy for especially troubled nations: Iran has positioned the US as the "great Satan", and Venezuela ranted about Bush as satanic.
...
written by hunh?, February 17, 2010
While Lula may feel the urge to exorcise his own childhood demons by spouting off against the West, as someone who grew up relatively poor in the US, I know there can be a strong urge to demonize the rich and powerful, yet this is a false and simplistic strategy, that in time, creates generates certain self-serving lies, and in time, others will see through the illusions and deception it promotes.
Good for...
written by jakob, February 17, 2010
Good for Petrobras, but this is the only company of such size in Brazil. Also, everybody and everything depends on Petrobras, especially in the state of Rio de Janeiro, and the dangers of mono-economies are well-known. Diversification, diversification.
...
written by João da Silva, February 17, 2010

While Lula may feel the urge to exorcise his own childhood demons by spouting off against the West


I didn't know Lula´s Brasil is located in the East.smilies/wink.gif
...
written by hunh?, February 17, 2010
I didn't know Lula´s Brasil is located in the East.


Ha-ha! Ok, that is funny. Pardon my sloppy writing here. I guess if I am going to identify countries by location it would have been more appropriate to say the Northern developed nations, but this may be equally silly. In fact I was thinking of major Western developed nations, so rather than name them I tried some shorthand, but clearly that is confusing.
You bring me to another question related to East/West distinctions. While the US is often the butt of criticism of Brazilians, I wonder if Japan is vilified for its poor treatment of Brazilian immigrants who work in their 3D Jobs (dangerous, dirty, demeaning). While immigrants are treated poorly and as second class citizens world wide, there is a range of abuse, and Japan ranks far worse than the US in terms of its treatment of Brazilian (and other) immigrants. Since I have clearly heard much criticism of the US by Brazilians about their treatment of immigrants, I am curious if they are equally critical of Japan.
...
written by João da Silva, February 18, 2010

Pardon my sloppy writing here. I guess if I am going to identify countries by location it would have been more appropriate to say the Northern developed nations, but this may be equally silly.


No need to apologize. It is very common to make such mistakes. I guess that is the reason the economists are coining new words like G-20, BRIC, etc; to denominate the countries according to the GNP.

On a serious note: I have read some of your comments and obviously you know quite a bit about Brsil and the politics here. I observed that you are not a big fan of Mr.Lula and especially highly critical of his friendly overtures to Iran. You must also know that he is in the final year of his second mandate and by this time next year, we will have a new President.

My question to you: Is your complaint just against him or the party he represents (PT) and its policy?
...
written by hunh?, February 18, 2010
Hi Joao, I will try to answer your question below.
My question to you: Is your complaint just against him or the party he represents (PT) and its policy?

I know some general things about the PT because I lived in Brazil for 2.5 years, but I can't say I am really aware of their entire platform. I can say that I am the far Left political spectrum, and like the many Brazilians who voted for Lula, as an outside observer, I was disappointed in Lula from what I saw when I lived there. Well I should qualify that statement.
In case you think I am your typical conservative American, I hope you don't mind a personal digression into my own evolving political perspective. I would say in my youth I was one of a rare few group of Americans that would identify with the agenda of communism, which i came to as a teenager through first hearing a liberation theology priest who preached that Christ would be against the vast inequality of wealth in the US and the world. Then later when I met a professor who was aligned with the communist party, I was "converted" to this perspective. My father was a construction worker, perhaps much like Lula and his former working class friends, who lost his job in his early 40s due to asbestos fiber in both of his lungs and a heart condition. My family lived on government money for disabled workers until I left home, which was at the time, just below the poverty level in my state in the US. When I heard the philosophy of communism, considering what I saw in my father's treatment, I was ripe to "convert", and like Lula, I was bitterly resentful about the inequality of wealth and opportunity I saw around me.
Yet, in time, I read Camus and others, and learned about the atrocities of the USSR and Cuba, and I grew apart from the communist agenda, and instead, saw myself as some kind of democratic socialist, much like the parties in the EU, with their more "humanist" agenda. I would be interested in seeing the state truly working to serve needs of the majority of working and middle class members, and I do not believe corporations left to their own agenda of maximizing profit, will solve many of the social problems, unless prodded to do so. Issues like poverty, health care needs, education, and other services that are public, in my opinion, are not going to be remedied by corporate interests. So the state, I believe needs to take an active role in representing the "common good" as Rousseau talked of. In terms of being on the far Left, lately, I have even been questioning whether we will ever see a fair and effective political configuration that will replace the market. Since all past attempts have lapsed into Stalinism and left millions of innocent people slaughtered in its wake, I am less trusting of "revolutions" and more interested in democratic mass movements, that fight for gradual change. So in some respects, people on the far Left may even see me as a liberal since I am uncertain about what a democratic socialism would look like since one has never succeeded. Even the democratic socialists of Europe co-exist with an equally strong market system. I would be pleased to see in my lifetime if the US would move more in the direction of the European socialists, but this will be no easy evolution, yet I think the general consciousness of Americans have been moving in that direction, but they are fearful of words like socialism. For example, the overwhelming majority of Americans 65-85%, depending on the polls you read) supported a health care reform initiative known as the "public option". It resembled a state run health care program similar to those found in the EU: both good quality care, yet at a far lower cost than those offered by the private medical insurance industry. We pay ironically far more in the US for a medical system that delivers far less than its EU counterpart. So while many Americans support the public option, if you asked them whether they support "socialized medicine" far more would recoil.


...
written by hunh?, February 18, 2010
Well, I am digressing here, to give you more information about my background in answering your question. I am somewhere on the far Left, and in theory I would probably be aligned with many of the policies of the PT and Lula. I was in fact pleased to hear about his "zero hunger" program as well as his "bolsa de famila", yet I would have been more impressed to see well paid jobs available for many of the poor in Brazil, yet I guess Lula was working with what was possible. I was also pleased to hear him talk about supporting the "Landless movement" as well as expanding monitoring illegal exploitation of the Amazon, yet in actual practice, I am now more cynical whether either of these claims have come to fruition. When I left Brazil a few years ago, I generally thought Lula was trying to steer Brazil in the right direction, yet even then, I adamantly believed that the corruption charges against his party were likely true, and that his party was gravely off the course in this regard. Brazilians were ( and are) looking for a change, and rightfully so. These corruption cases seriously damages the legitimacy of Lula and his party. I was disappointed that many Brazilians overlooked this, and were willing to still vote for him, which seemed a sad statement about the political conscience of many Brazilians. I would equally fault them with not being consistent: if the Right has been guilty of corruption in Brazil, it does not mean this is acceptable from Left wing parties.

More recently, when reading about how Lula was hugging Ahmadinejad, I was shocked. I had been following the mass protests in the streets of Iran, and how his party and their militias have brutally attacked, tortured and killed people for simply protesting peacefully. This alliance between Lula and Ahmadinejad was enough to turn me against Lula. Yet I read a story here about how he has also turned a blind eye to equally oppressive regimes in the Sudan and elsewhere, seemingly for the sake of cutting a business deal. Also, I am disappointed with his simplistic demonizing of the US for the ills of Brazil. As a former union boss, I would have been more impressed if he fought strongly against his own local elite, and did as much as possible to reverse the trend of inequality of wealth in Brazil, but I think Lula likes to thumb his nose at the US, because his constituents believe this makes Brazil look powerful. Yet, it does little for changing the poor relations between North and South that deteriorated under Bush. Obama is not Bush: he is interested in multi-lateral initiatives among nations, and any South American leader who does not see this is missing an opportunity. It seems Lula needs better intelligence ( I mean intelligence in the sense of information about another country) about the US, China, and Iran: clearly the world sees the leaders of Iran for who they are, and many EU nations are warming up to Obama in an attempt to create more multi-lateral agreements and initiatives. Yet Lula, seems to be going more in the direction of Chavez: using the US as a convenient bogeyman, to deflect criticism of his own failings. I was also repulsed by his gloating about how Brazil avoided much of the recession, while the "blue eyed" people of the North were responsible for this mess. Many comments on this blog equally relished in the sufferings of the US in this recession, yet ironically, this recession has hurt poor Americans unproportionally: illegal immigrants( including many Brazilians) and poor and working class Americans have suffered the most from job loss and foreclosure on homes. So what is to celebrate of this? While Brazil seems eager to bask in the limelight as a global leader, such antics seemed insensitive and highly undiplomatic. You will never see or hear Americans or US politicians (or any other developed nations) taking pleasure in the sufferings of Brazil and gloating about the success of the US and the failures of the "brown eyed people of the South" : it would be utterly insensitive, with racist connotations as well. Yet this is the kind of nonsense Lula has indulged in to court popularity at home, and cultivate the bitter resentment so many Brazilians have of developed nations.
So, in a nutshell, to answer your question: no I am not simply against broad leftist policy of the PT, nor was I initially against Lula, but in time, I grew disillusioned with him, perhaps like many on the Left in Brazil as well. The last straw came when Lula hugged Ahmadinejad, who denies the holocaust, rants about wiping Israel off the map if Iran gets nuclear weapons, and now is brutally repressing a non-violent mass democratic movement protesting rigged elections, and seeking greater transparency and democratic politics for Iran.
...
written by hunh?, February 18, 2010
Ederson: America is a very stupid country and you are glad you don't live here? Most Brazilians I know here are grateful to be here working as professors, or in various high-tech or research positions, which could not get in Brazil, and this was not due to lack of qualification, but lack of opportunity.
I am glad to hear you love Brazil. Happiness wherever you can find it, is what is important. But why do you need to bitterly attack America. But you remind me of that famous Shakespeare quote:: "the lady doth protest too much". Why not just enjoy your happy life in Brazil, and spare us the mindless jingoistic flag waving and just enjoy the paradise of Brazil? Instead, you display typical resentment of Brazilians who are hate the US, as they seem to be just envious of the superpower status of the US. So you don't
written by Ederson, February 17, 2010
America is a stupid country. It makes so many mistakes and is always overextending itself economically and militarily. It is also one of the few countries where the greatest threat to the health of the poor is obesity! They also spend too much time warring with their politicians and leaders, and they never stop trying to reinvent themselves. Why would anybody want to live there!
Thank God that no matter what happens in and to Brasil, nothing ever really changes, Brasil will always be Brasil.


Why would anyone want to live there you say. Why don't you begin by asking some of the millions of Brazilians who migrate here to find work and a better life? Of course they often are discrete when they talk to Brazilians about the US, because they are expected to exclaim some kind of nationalistic love of Brazil as a paradise on Earth. But I know many of them here, and marry Americans and love the lifestyle here very much. What is tiring about this blog is the unending boasting and jingoistic fairy tales people like you want to spin about Brazil, which could be summarized as: US = EVIL; Brazil = Paradise. Sorry, the world is not so simple, America is no paradise, nor is it evil, and the same goes for Brazil. Take off your patriotic blinders and wake up and smell the coffee as we say up north. You would do your people and country a service by cultivating a healthy critical view of your culture, and politics.
By the way, the obesity issue plaguing certain communities (especially poor black and hispanic) is not something limited to the US, but I guess your black and white view likes this kind of reductionistic nonsense. This is a worldwide issue that threatens to reach epidemic proportions if left unchecked. Besides, if you look into Brazilian biomedical research, you can find similar trends among certain Brazilians who eat high dense calorie diets, and the results are increasing levels of diabetes type 2 as well. The UN-WHO has declared this a concern worldwide, yet this doesn't fit with your fairy tale about all things in Brazil are extraordinary. If you really followed the Christian doctrine you likely grew up with, you would have a more compassionate view of Americans like any other people of the world: We are not devils with horns; we are just like you: we seek greater happiness; we seek justice; and we suffer loss, old age, and death like the rest of the world. We are all one family.
...
written by fried chc, February 19, 2010



Gringalhada...Talk to the Hand


/"
|./|
| |
| |
|>~
....................
written by fried chc, February 19, 2010


Stinky Gringalhada… Talk to the Hand

/"
|./|
| |
| |
|>~
.............
written by fried chc, February 19, 2010




Querida Gringalhada das Caraia…

Talk to the Hand

/"
|./|
| |
| |
|>~
...
written by fried chc, February 19, 2010


Gringolandia.... Talk to the Hand

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
..........................'...../
..........''............. _.·´
..........................(
..............................

Hehehe.... Costa
...
written by hunh?, February 20, 2010
fried chc, shouldn't you be out playing with your junior high school friends? I think your mommy would turn off your computer if she knew what you were doing. Now be a good boy and go out and play with your friends in the school yard.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack