Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33081435

Who's Online

We have 774 guests online



The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship PDF Print E-mail
2010 - April 2010
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral   
Tuesday, 13 April 2010 03:29

Brazilian president Castelo BrancoThe Brazilian formula for success includes periods of dictatorship, and Brazil had three periods in its history when Brazil benefited from being under a certain form of a government: benevolent dictatorial regime.

Benevolent dictatorship is a form of government in which an authoritarian leader exercises political power for the benefit of the whole population rather than exclusively for his/her own self-interest or benefit, or for the benefit of only a small portion of the population.

We can say that the first period lasted three years (1821 - 1823) when José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva became Prime Minister of Brazil in 1821. The second period lasted eight years (Nov 1937 - Oct 1945) when Getúlio Vargas became a dictator in Brazil in 1937. And the third period lasted twenty-one years (1964 - 1985); these were the military dictatorship years which started in 1964 when General Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, seized power through a coup d'état.

José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva - Prime Minister (1821 - 1823)

When Prince Dom Pedro asked José Bonifácio to be his Prime Minister in 1822, the Prince Regent was aware that he could not find a more qualified person for that job in Brazil. José Bonifácio told the Prince Regent that he would accept the position only when allowed to impose his unlimited authority. Dom Pedro did not hesitate. He armed José Bonifácio with the highest level of authority possible. The investiture of José Bonifácio carried with it the most extensive powers that any minister had in the history of the imperial or republican Brazil.

The Prince Regent, and later Emperor, on various occasions made a point of showing in public the high regard that he had for his Prime Minister by handing him in official ceremonies the bastion of mordomo-mor, symbol of uncontested prestige. This set the stage for José Bonifácio to assume his Prime Minister position which would enable him to do a masterful job that culminated with the independence of Brazil from Portugal.

To this day no one has accomplished so much in Brazilian history as José Bonifácio, and his accomplishments were done in a very short period of time in the three years from 1821 to 1823.

José Bonifácio had a clear vision, objective and realistic, of the functions of a modern State. In his writings and personal correspondence, in most documents, in government decrees, and in official and diplomatic correspondence to other governments, we can see that he understood the social and economic problems of his day. He also had a profound understanding of the political issues and of what could be realistically done.

His goal was to guide Brazil to a smoother transition than the one that he had seen in France during the French Revolution.  He also was aware of the current anarchy present in the new nations that were getting their independence from the Spanish Empire, as was the case in Argentina.

In his writings, correspondence, government documents and government decrees we can see that José Bonifácio and his brother Martim Francisco had an excellent grasp of economic theory and that their thoughts were way ahead of their time on that subject.

The Critical Period

There was a critical nine-month period from March 1822 to December 1822 in which José Bonifácio almost in a despotic fashion issued decree after decree establishing the foundations which would give the social, political and economic structure for the new nation.

José Bonifácio's actions were arrogant, inflexible, firm, and irreconcilable with dissident groups, but at the same time they were compatible with the people and the nation whose interests he was defending.

When José Bonifácio participated in the provisory government of São Paulo, he prepared a document that was signed by the members of the provisory government on October 9, 1821 called "Lembranças e Apontamentos". This document might be the most important document in the history of reforms in Brazil. The document provided a complete master plan for the new nation and covered in detail all the necessary building blocks of social, political and economic life.

José Bonifácio's major accomplishment in Brazil was the consolidation of independence with national sovereignty, political unity and territorial integrity.

José Bonifácio was not about money; he did not care about money and he had many opportunities over the years to get all kinds of land and tittles in Portugal and in Brazil, and he turned them down every time. If he wanted, he could have been the first Emperor of Brazil, but he turned down a number of times the offers from Dom Pedro, first in 1822 and later when Dom Pedro abdicated in 1828, since he did not want to be Emperor of Brazil.

I need to remind the readers that José Bonifácio's life does not include two of the most important aspects of modern life of today; greed and materialism. José Bonifácio never cared for material things, money or noble titles, and things of this sort. He was interested in science and the well being of society. He was a humanist, a social thinker, and a great statesman. He followed a high ethical standard for all of his life. He was a very honest man. He had integrity, honor and many other qualities which are out of fashion in the political arena today. He also had to participate in four duels on four separate occasions to defend his honor, in which his adversaries lost their lives.

Many of my ancestors and members of the "Andrada e Silva" and the "Souza Queiroz" families have been important players in Brazilian history at key moments of Brazilian history as follows:

1) Antônio Carlos and the Mason Revolution of 1817

Antônio Carlos was working in Olinda, Pernambuco Province as a magistrate when a Republican and Mason Revolution broke out in that province in 1817. He was asked to join the leadership of that revolution. He even sent a letter to José Bonifácio in Portugal dated April 14, 1817 describing what was happening. In that letter he mentioned how well the revolution had turned out.

A short time later José Bonifácio (in Portugal) found out that the revolution in Pernambuco had been a disaster for the revolutionists. Most of the leaders of that revolution had been hanged. The only reason they spared Antônio Carlos' life was because they knew he was a brother of José Bonifácio. (The revolution in Pernambuco was crushed by the Portuguese and lasted only 75 days.)

Antônio Carlos spent four years in prison for participating in that revolution. When José Bonifácio returned to Brazil at the end of 1819, his brother Antônio Carlos was still in prison in the province of Bahia.

2) José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva (The Patriarch of Brazilian Independence)

He was the architect and solely responsible for the independence and unity of Brazil in 1822 as I described above.

3) Antonio Carlos and Martin Francisco rocked the boat once more in 1840

José Bonifácio had died from cancer in 1838. But the influence of the Andrada Family had not diminished and his brothers Antonio Carlos and Martin Francisco were the most important figures that forced the emancipation of Dom Pedro II to become the second Emperor of Brazil in 1840 - and Antonio Carlos became the new Prime Minister, and Martin Francisco became the Finance Minister for the second time.

4) Senator Vergueiro became one of the 3 regents in 1828

In a time of political crisis in Brazil Senator Vergueiro became one of the 3 regents in 1828 when D. Pedro I abdicated on behalf of his 5-year old son. And he requested to not be reappointed in 1832 as a regent, because he wanted to go back to manage his businesses.

Antonia Eufrosina Campos Vergueiro de Souza Queiroz, a daughter of Nicolau Pereira de Campos Vergueiro, a senator and regent, was my great great grandmother and she married the Barão de Souza Queiroz and had 13 children of which my great grandfather was the youngest.

Getúlio Vargas - Benevolent Dictator (Nov 1937 - Oct 1945)

In 1937 Getúlio Vargas became a dictator in Brazil - a benevolent dictator.

A new Constitution was adopted in 1937 and the period was characterized by a large intervention of the State; Vargas used his nearly unlimited powers to implement deep changes in Brazil.

Vargas created the DASP - Administrative Department of Public Service, to adapt the civil service to the new times; before DASP, a job in government depended on political indications (with deletery consequences to the quality of services provided); DASP was the beginning of professionalization of civil servants in Brazil.

Noticing that industrialization was changing labor relationships in the country, Vargas instituted the minimum wage in Brazil and passed a labor legislation which is enforced until today. Because of these acts, which benefited a mass of urban workers, Vargas is often referred to as the "Father of the Poor."

He declared war on Germany, Italy and Japan, driven not so much by principles, but by financial reasons. And taking advantage of the fact that US and United Kingdom wanted to have Brazil as an ally during the World War II, Vargas negotiated funds for the installation of heavy industries in Brazil, such as the first steel mill of Brazil; Vargas also laid the basis for the creation of future petroleum and electricity national companies.

Examples of these efforts include the Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (or CVRD, as the company was better known prior to 2007), a company that was founded in Itabira, Minas Gerais, as a public company by the Brazilian Federal Government on June 1, 1942. And later President Getúlio Vargas created the government-run oil company Petróleo Brasileiro SA, or Petrobras, in the early 1950s.

The creation of a Brazilian aircraft manufacturer was planned during the 1940s by the Brazilian Government as part of a technical development formed by the General Command for Aerospace Technology (CTA), the Aeronautics Technological Institute (ITA) and Embraer.

The first step in the creation of a Brazilian aircraft industry was the creation of IPD - Instituto de Pesquisas e Desenvolvimento (Research and Development Institute), current IAE - Instituto de Aeronáutica e Espaço (Aeronautics and Space Institute), which was born inside CTA, on January 1, 1954.

The Military Dictatorship Years (1964 - 1985)

In March 31, 1964, the Brazilian Army, then led by General Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, seized power through a coup d'état, beginning the Military Dictatorship in Brazil, which lasted 21 years.

On July 29, 1969 the Ministry of Aeronautics created Embraer in Brazil. By this time, the company had about 500 employees, including many former engineers from both CTA and ITA.

In the 1970’s when the generals were in charge of the Brazilian economy - Brazil's Ministry of Aeronautics planted the seeds and made major efforts to contribute to the development of the aerospace and defense industry including the growth of Embraer.

During the 1970’s the generals also planted the seeds in Brazil for Brazil’s future energy self-sufficiency and independence from foreign oil.

Brazil did not fix its energy problem based on free market solutions. If Brazil depended on the goodwill of free market players to fix its dependence on imported oil, then Brazil still would be a slave to that market like the United States is today. During the oil shock of the 1970’s Brazil imported about 90 percent of its oil needs in Brazil, and in 2010 Brazil is an oil exporting country.

Who had the foresight to fix that problem in Brazil?

The generals did - in the mid 1970’s when we had that major global oil crisis the Brazilian economy was hurt very badly - Brazil had a military dictatorship at that time, and the generals decided that Brazil was going to fix that energy problem and they put in place all the rules and regulations to help develop ethanol production on a large scale in Brazil. And Brazil was able to develop the ethanol industry and its distribution system based on sugar cane because of government planning and implementation of the plan.

As we can see by the above examples some of the best economic policies adopted by the Brazilian economy were adopted courtesy of periods of benevolent dictatorships in Brazil  - First, when a civilian politician such as Getúlio Vargas was the dictator in Brazil (from 1937 to 1945) and finally the period of 21 years of military dictatorship under a Brazilian Military Government (from March 1964 to March 1985).

Under the dictatorship of a civilian politician, and later under the dictatorship of the military important economic changes were adopted and implemented in Brazil that planted the seeds for long-term Brazilian economic prosperity.

Conclusion: It is time for a new Benevolent Dictatorship in Brazil

Brazil has been doing very well economically for the last 10 years, and the future of the Brazilian economy looks outstanding for decades to come. But what good does all that prosperity do for the Brazilian people when the quality of life is declining more and more, year after year, and most Brazilians are afraid of even leaving their homes because of widespread crime with criminal gangs that terrorize the population.

Today the criminals are better armed in Brazil than any local police department, and in many cases police corruption is making the problem even worse for the civilian population. Only the military is equipped today to clean up this widespread social mess and bring back social order and harmony in Brazil.

I am not suggesting that the military seized power of the government in Brazil for ideological, or political reasons, or because I don't agree with economic system that we have in Brazil. I am suggesting that the military should seize power again in Brazil through a coup d'état, because we all know that this massive crime problem that is devastating the Brazilian population can't be solved under a democratic system of government, and because of the actions that have to be taken to bring peace to all neighborhoods in Brazil. It is time for a benevolent military dictator to take power in Brazil and get the job done.
 
I am not in favor of a permanent dictatorship system in Brazil, but Brazilian history has shown us that after a period of time the Brazilian economy always benefits in a big way from a period under a benevolent dictator. And in 2010 the situation in Brazil is ripe for a new period under a military dictatorship, since Brazil has been engulfed for many years in a completely out of control massive crime wave with no end in sight.

Enough is enough - we need to take immediate action and bite the bullet and start implementing the hard choices that will be made by the new military government. The military government will have their hands full regarding their efforts to clean up the widespread crime wave, government corruption at all levels, and lawlessness in Brazil.

The military government after fixing these problems would place the Brazilian economy on a new path to future growth and prosperity to everyone, and also social peace and harmony inside Brazil.

It is time for a new General Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco to rise to power in Brazil to put our house in order including the clean up of the massive crime wave in most cities, the criminal gangs and drug dealers who are completely out of control, and also fix the problem regarding the sem-terra, and sem-teto and stop the land invasion by these people against private property, and do something about the widespread corruption at all levels of government.

We need a general with high character, ethics, morality, an honest man with the highest level of integrity, but at the same time a very special leader who can get this job done - with a mandate to reinstate social order, and clean up the corruption in Brazil.

Today I don't know the name of the potential military candidates in Brazil that could play the role of a new Castelo Branco, but based on recent Brazilian history there’s only one name that comes to mind: General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira.

I wonder if the Brazilian military forces would unite behind General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira in case of a new Brazilian military coup d'état, or if a new surprising military leader in Brazil would rise to the occasion.

Anyway, we have reached a point in Brazil that it is time for action to get the clean up job done, before Brazil can move forward into the next level, and become recognized as one of the elite countries of this new century.

*****

You can read other articles by Ricardo C. Amaral at:
Brazzil magazine - Columnist: Ricardo C. Amaral
http://brazzilnews.blogspot.com/

Ricardo C. Amaral is a writer and economist. He can be reached at
brazilamaral@yahoo.com.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (185)Add Comment
The modern concept of a dictator
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 13, 2010

Before someone say something regarding what I said on this article about Jose Bonifacio de Andrada e Silva and the fact that during the period that he was in power as Prime Minister, we can consider that period as a dictatorship.

As I said on the above article: “There was a critical nine-month period from March 1822 to December 1822 in which José Bonifácio almost in a despotic fashion issued decree after decree establishing the foundations which would give the social, political and economic structure for the new nation.”

What I did not mention of the article is that most of the time the first time Dom Pedro I saw these decrees were when Jose Bonifacio handed them to Dom Pedro for him to sign the documents – which he did on a regular basis.

Regarding the subject of dictatorship:

Oliver Cromwell was the real deal, and he is considered to be the first dictator in history based on our modern concept of who is a dictator.

By the way, there are many movies made about him by Hollywood.

Bio: Oliver Cromwell (25 April 1599 – 3 September 165smilies/cool.gif was…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell


Reminder to give you a perspective of the relationship between British/US history:

Oliver Cromwell is an important figure that helped shape English history, and since the United States were a colony of the British at that time – that means that indirectly Cromwell is also part of US history.

The Thirteen English colonies that would become the original US states, were founded along the east coast beginning in 1607. The Thirteen Colonies grew very rapidly, reaching about 50,000 people by 1650, and 250,000 by 1700.

When Oliver Cromwell was in power in England around 1650 most of the people living on the Thirteen Colonies were British immigrants, and there were very few Gringos born here in the old USA.
.
This will end well...
written by dusty, April 13, 2010
Ricardo, seriously.

The concept of sending Brazil backwards to a Military Dictatorship is asinine. A move like that would destroy all forward progress Brazil has made economically and socially. It is never wise to look to the past for solutions, you look at the past to fix mistakes and do it better.

The military government after fixing these problems would place the Brazilian economy on a new path to future growth and prosperity to everyone, and also social peace and harmony inside Brazil.


The Brazilian economy is surging, the middle class is growing, jobs are being created. Brazil just skated through one of the worst Global economic meltdowns in history. You're acting like Brazil has not made any gains since the Dictatorship ended in 1985.

As if the military can clean everything up and make it all right, that is absurd. They had 21 years to do that very thing and instead spent a fair amount of time committing egregious human rights violations, developed very little infrastructure and did nothing to alleviate corruption. As it pains me to say this, but since Lula's taking office in 2002 with his blend of social/economic programs, Brazil has enjoyed unprecedented growth. Paving the way for a once dismissed country to become an economic powerhouse. You can't make the same claims during the Military Dictatorship.

Social Peace and harmony is lie. You seem to honestly believe that a group who forcefully seizes power will care about the people. Sure there has been examples in the past, but none of those coups had what exists today. If it happens again, the person leading the charge won't be doing it under the banner of social justice. Instead they will be driven by greed, with the prospect of controlling 50 billion barrels of light sweet crude worth trillions. The kind of person you want to seize power doesn't exist, because true benevolent people do not take what is not theirs. To seize power is to go against the will of the people, especially in a country with a Constitution and a democratically elected government.

Regarding the military being the only ones who can clean up the crime, you're wrong. BOPE and other special police teams make daily raids into the Favelas. It is a well known fact that since 2003 the police have killed 1,000 people in such raids. The current practice of pacification of known violent areas is getting good results in Rio. Do you think that if the military goes in and kills 500,000 people that will fix the problem? How many people have to die in order to achieve your pursuit of social harmony?

You need to spend some time looking at what causes people to choose a life of crime. Education is something everyone needs, giving people the knowledge and skills so they are prepared for the job market. Public education is deplorable in Brazil, private schools have waiting listings spanning years. Another issue is the inadequate after school programs for kids. Most public schools in Brazil don't even go the full day, so after school these kids have a ton of time on their hands, a fair amount use that time to get into trouble. Keep them occupied with something constructive and crime will decline.

Corruption plays a huge part in not being able to get anything done. Being corrupt is a way of life in Brazil, the practice is completely ingrained into the society. How is the military going to solve the issue of corruption when they themselves are already corrupt? That is like having the blind lead the blind. It doesn't even make sense in any manner of rational thought. During the '64 to '85 years, those in power paid the police horrible wages, so they had no choice but to turn to graft just to survive. I'm not excusing them for making a poor choice, but come on, you're demanding a return to something that gave birth to the problems Brazil is currently facing.

Brazil is on the right path, it is always darkest right before the dawn, have faith.
...
written by João da Silva, April 13, 2010


A well written article providing historical facts. Controversial and different from the ones written by our professional politicians and the sensational press that are trying to rewrite the history.

My kudos to Ricardo Amaral for expressing his customary outspoken views.
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, April 13, 2010

Hi Ricardo,

What was the original title of the article when you sent it in for publication?smilies/cheesy.gif
...
written by Ederson, April 13, 2010
Ricardo!
I think most people will miss the point of your article and the desperate, underlying message, but I believe I understand it. In so many ways, you have hit the nail precisely on the head. Interesting.
...
written by João da Silva, April 13, 2010

Corruption plays a huge part in not being able to get anything done. Being corrupt is a way of life in Brazil, the practice is completely ingrained into the society.


So you are justifying corruption, declaring that it is the "way of life" in Brasil?

Brazil is on the right path, it is always darkest right before the dawn, have faith.


With the kind of attitude our politicians have, yes, we are on the "right" path-to become a Plantation.smilies/wink.gif
Reply to Joao da Silva
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 13, 2010

Joao da Silva: What was the original title of the article when you sent it in for publication?


*****


Ricardo: I asked the editor of Brazzil magazine to keep the title that I had on this article when I submitted the article for publication.

And I am pleased that he did keep the original title that I submit for publication.

This article had been 95 percent ready for publication for the last 3 months, but I have been thinking over and over if I should finish the article and send it for publication.

I actually like president Lula, and his administration has done a lot of things right, and Brazil is in the best shape economically that I can remember.

My problem is not with the economic situation in Brazil, since his economic team has been doing an outstanding job.

My problem with Brazil is related with all the feedback that I get almost unanimously regarding the criminal gangs and widespread crime wave that has been hitting not only the biggest cities, but also it has been spreading to small towns around Brazil.

Year after year, everybody that goes to Brazil when they come back they have horror stories to tell about widespread crime in Brazil. And I speak with friends and relatives in various parts of Brazil on a regular basis, and they tell me that even in places that never had this type of problem before things are getting out of hand.

Everybody that I talk to in Brazil is afraid of what is going on in Brazil related to the crime wave, and they tell me that the current condition is getting worse all the time.

I am aware of what is happening with the sem-terra and how they are intimidating the farmers and taking part of their lands – and the police it does nothing to help the farmers to protect their private property.

Brazil is doing great and have an outstanding prospect for the future, and I am aware that the mafias of the world will move in to take a piece of our great country. We can’t let the mafias of the world undermine and destroy the prospect for a great Brazil and our place among the best countries on the world in the new century.

I am sorry to say, but the job that has to be done it can’t be done under a system of democracy. If that was possible then the United States would not be in a mess that they are today regarding the drug trade and many government policies that went bad and is destroying that great country.

Even though Brazil has achieved great prosperity in the last 10 years, I have never seen my friends and relatives in a sense of being afraid for their lives and in complete despair all related to the widespread crime wave and lawlessness that we have in Brazil.

All the stories that I have been hearing about for a long time, plus what I read and see on the main stream media makes me very angry and that’s why I finally decided to publish this article and hope for the best.

By the way, I am not sending a copy of this article to all members of Congress in Brazil as I usually do after publishing a new article.

.
Reply to dusty
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 13, 2010

Ricardo: After the military take over the government in Brazil I want to suggest that they all read the latest book by John and Doris Naisbitt – “China’s Megatrends – The 8 Pillars of a New Society” published in January 2010.

On this book John Naisbitt does an outstanding job as usual in describing how the Chinese is creating right now an entirely new social and economic system, and a political model.

Maybe this new Chinese model might be the key and the new systems that can lift all the boats in Brazil, and at the same time get corruption and crime under control.

This book is opening my eyes in many ways, and I finally started understanding how the Chinese have been able to lift almost 400 million boats out of poverty in the last 20 years.

The Chinese new system is work in progress and improving all the time for the benefit of the entire Chinese population.

My congratulations to the Chinese government for doing such a great job in China in the last 2 decades.

By the way, the concept of human rights is a relative term. How about the human rights of the rest of the population that are being violated in Brazil on a daily basis by the widespread violence of the criminal gangs?

I am sorry to say, but there’s no nice way to clean up this mess in Brazil.

.
Better A Benevolent Dictator...(1)
written by Lloyd Cata, April 13, 2010
And so we see, my friends, that Mr. Amaral, for reasons both personal and historical(depending on whose perspective we believe!) favors dictatorship to freedom. Believing that 'order' in society cannot be achieved by democratic means. He makes a powerful argument that this is the way for Brazil's future to become a member of the 'elite' nations of the world.

Although the history does not provide us with the details of the Brazilian independence, Mr. Amaral does note; "José Bonifácio's actions were arrogant, inflexible, firm, and irreconcilable with dissident groups, but at the same time they were compatible with the people and the nation whose interests he was defending.

I can only imagine the massive genocide carried out during this period. Understanding that the indigenous peoples of the region, and the slave populations were represented as "disident groups". Whereas the 'people' are represented by those with kinship and allegiance to former colonial powers. Thus, there is no historical norm, as in many cases of a "war of independence" such as was the case in most of the America's, and still continues in the struggle to remove the shackles of imperialism. Brazil's independence, seemingly the result of Empirical Decree is in fact an anomaly(no?) in freedom from colonial rule. In truth, it appears that Mr. Bonifácio's success was the result of his influence in the Portuguese court. In this he should be celebrated as a 'clever' tactician in advancing 'freedom' for Euro-Brazilians, because remember that he was simply an "immigrant European" before becoming the 'father of the nation'. In the case of US emancipation, you would say that he was Benjamin Franklin(who was the revolutionary ambassador to the French Court, George Washington(who was ideally suited to carry out the military aspects of the revolution), and Thomas Jefferson(who laid out the framework of 'constitutional authority') all rolled into one. Certainly an achievement worthy of the honor Brazilians bestow upon him. Yet, to advocate the methods of such success is contrary to the intelligence and dignity of life in the 21st century. There can be no doubt that the blood spilled by the forces under his command ruthlessly murdered all opposition to his authority. If he no longer needed the consent of Portugal, he certainly still employed the methods of imperial rule. The pacification of Indigenous Brazilians and the institution of slavery were indeed in the manner of the United States. A legacy that he also should be recognize for in Brazilian history. These are issues that "still" remain and have not been completely resolved, even today. What Mr. Amaral describes as 'the people' of José Bonifácio's time have little resemblance to 'the people' of Brazil today(no?). No more than 'the people' of the USA today resemble 'the people' of the US during its independence. The violence of Brazil's independence was 'internal' and the history of the atrocities during this period is not widely published, if at all, Thus it is that the winners get to write the history. For the 'society' that existed before colonialization, not one word. I'm afraid Mr. Amaral considers "those people" as an insignificant aspect of the history, and so I continue to be disappointed in his narration. Although historically significant, lacking in the perspective of the narrative that the US understands in its 'evolution' to freedom "for all peoples". There is movement in the US to re-construct this narrative, just as in Brazil, but Americans are not blind to the incredible inhumanity of their past, both historically and recently. It is in our DNA you might say, that we are a better people than our ancestors, even though we have not completely cast off the inhumanity of colonial principles.
Better A Benevolent Dictator...(2)
written by Lloyd Cata, April 13, 2010
Getúlio Vargas - Benevolent Dictator (Nov 1937 - Oct 1945)
Vargas created the DASP - Administrative Department of Public Service, to adapt the civil service to the new times; before DASP, a job in government depended on political indications (with deletery consequences to the quality of services provided); DASP was the beginning of professionalization of civil servants in Brazil.
Vargas is often referred to as the "Father of the Poor."


It is notable that Mr. Amaral admires the accomplishments of Mr. Vargas. Although a "classic socialist", Mr. Vargas twice succumbed to the 'reactionary' forces of European and American influence. A 'workers paradise' in direct conflict with the tenets of the 'new' imperialists. Considering President Lula's history, it is notable that his own rise to power can be attributed to the policies of President Vargas. Thus, it is not Cuba's socialism that is a danger to Brazil. It is Brazil's socialism that is a danger, once again, to the imperialist designs of foreign powers. Mr. Amaral presents the accomplishments of Mr. Vargas as reasons for a return to benevolent dictatorship, but where does he admit the complicity of foreign influence of the military that led to his overthrow and subsequent surrender of his life? It almost mimics the actions of the Honduran drama that we see today. If any would argue the 'wisdom' of Brazilian 'interference' in the Honduran affair, they need only to consider the position of any Latin American leader who may oppose the Empire and their ability to sleep without the historical 'threat' of military forces pulling them from their beds in the middle of the night. Tyranny has no better definition than the 'elected' leader removed at the barrel of a gun. I did use this site,( http://www.rio-de-janeiro.info/getulio-vargas.htm ) as a basis for some of my comments, but my analysis of 'outside' influence upon this period in Brazilian history is consistent with the facts, as pointed out;( http://news.google.com/newspap...86,2140999 -please note the last sentence of the article).

In March 31, 1964, the Brazilian Army, then led by General Humberto de Alencar Castelo Branco, seized power through a coup d'état, beginning the Military Dictatorship in Brazil, which lasted 21 years.

Also the product of a policy "made in the USA". Once again, the Brazilian people are subjected to the ideology of a plantation society.

During the 1970’s the generals also planted the seeds in Brazil for Brazil’s future energy self-sufficiency and independence from foreign oil.

A notable accomplishment in the use of 'natural resources' to advance the cause of Brazilian freedom from the scourge of petroleum-based economic servitude that ravaged the developing world during this period. The US finds itself still chained to these economic imperatives to escape this petroleum-based tyranny of the American energy agenda. It is indeed an accomplishment which has allowed Brazil to deflect the Empires economic agenda and global financial crisis presently underway. Again, the brutality of this period, involving not just Brazilians, but the entire hemisphere, exhibits the worst aspects of 'so-called' benevolent dictatorship. Just as in case of Mr. Pinochet and other dictators on the continent during this period, Brazilian military leaders have outstanding criminal warrants among the international community for their behavior. Benevolent dictatorship being clearly shown as an oxymoron, depending upon the perspective of those who are the recipients of that benevolence.

As Mr. Amaral may note that I have previously espoused my preference for "a benevolent dictator over a corrupt democrat". That freedom is indeed threatened by crime and drugs, just as it is in the US. Many would prefer that the comparison were not so similar, but it is clearly the case that Brazil has 'followed' the US in the decline of its society through the corruption of their political and economic institutions, followed by the incredible increase in drug-related and other violence. I.e. 'the people' are disenfranchised by the political and financial corruption of a system in which they played no part except in 'electing' those empowered to preserve their freedom. That political corruption has 'allowed' the social decline of the society by deliberate inaction in the face of massive poverty. The 'threat' of social anarchy is real and very visible in the violence between security forces and the 'generic' community leaders who are 'allowed' to subjugate the poor. Remember that Mr. Obama's community in Illinois is also plagued by drugs and violence. Not to the extent presently in Brazil, but at one time just as widespread(see Crips and Bloods gangs, Nicky Barnes, and other American gangsters and drug lords).
Better A Benevolent Dictator...(3)
written by Lloyd Cata, April 13, 2010
No, sir! The threat is clear and the solution is the Law. The means is not the removal of constitutional rights from every Brazilian under a historically brutal dictatorship that has shown to be disrespectful of basic human rights. The means is not the jeopardy of Brazil's economy at a time of global uncertainty and the viciousness of market players who have stolen the future of too many Americans. There is a role for the military in the solution to corruption, crime, and drugs, but it need not involve the destruction of the political institutions. The honorable General Heleno can be instrumental in changing the self-destructive behavior plaguing Brazilian society, but as a soldier he has sworn to protect the nation, its people, and the constitution. The logic of his usurpation of legitimate government has nothing to do with the nature of the threat, but the desire for some to return to their past romanticized vision of the Brazilian dictatorship. If General Heleno wishes to preserve Brazilian freedom and the nation, he would indeed confront the government on the issue of 2 societies, 'us and them', the have's and the have-not's, the formally educated and the street educated populace. From seeing and reading his biography and statements, I don't believe General Heleno has the capacity to give the orders that would result in the deaths of so many Brazilians, but there are those who will, and I have no doubt that they are heartened by Mr. Amaral's analysis and recommendation. I would hope that General Heleno be appointed as Attorney General of Brazil with 'emergency powers' to enforce 'all' of Brazil's Laws, regardless of class, political affiliation, or social status. In accordance with this a 'special court' should be convened to which General Heleno would prosecute those 'alledged' to be a danger to Brazilian society, either by corruption, drugs, or violence. Eliot Ness was such a 'lawman' in the US and it might be remembered that he brought down the most powerful gangsters in the US, but the most important part of his legacy was that he did it under presidential leadership and in respect for the law as imparted in the US Constitution. Thus the most vicious criminals in America, both politicians and gangsters, were imprisoned on 'tax' charges rather than their control of the worst aspects of the society. Certainly others were dispatched by the violence they did bring upon themselves.

My friends, if we are to live as civilized people with opportunity for all, in societies free from the scourges of corruption, crime, and violence, it will not be by returning to the formulas of the past; specifically when those formulas involved the dehumanization and murder of people with different opinions. There are indeed lessons from the past that we dare not forget, but to imitate the actions of past dictators will do more to destroy Brazil's society and economy than any other threat to the nation. This would be my recommendation to Americans, and IMHO it is a recommendation that will advance Brazil's society and economic progress. Brazil is not China. There is no Mao Tse-Tung of the Chinese Revolution, nor is one necessary. The truth is not easy, but it is the truth that Brazilians need to fight the injustice with which they are all jeopardized. No longer will injustice be rewarded and no longer will disrespect for the Law be tolerated is the message and the process that 'all' people can understand and support.
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 13, 2010

Thanks for the long essay, Dr.Cata and I am sure all the bloggers will appreciate your taking the precious time off to comment. Your comments just confirm what our compatriot "Seu Ederson" wrote:

I think most people will miss the point of your article and the desperate, underlying message, but I believe I understand it. In so many ways, you have hit the nail precisely on the head.


I am afraid that you are one of those who "missed the point of Ricardo´s article and the desperate underlying message". Though I do not always agree with him, he has got most of the points right. Some can be bettered, though.

On the contrary, Dr.Cata, you have demonstrated your total ignorance of the period 1964-85. Probably, you didn't even know where Brasil was located.smilies/wink.gif

Some questions I have for ya:

1)What qualifications does Gen.Heleno have to hold the post of "Attorney General"? As far as I know, he doesn't hold a law degree and our OAB whiners are bound to raise hell if he is appointed.

2)Supposing that he does hold a law degree, who will appoint him as AG?

3) What if some party offers a ticket to stand for the job of the President and the Brasilians elect him as their President through the ballot?

I am not finished with you yet.smilies/grin.gifsmilies/angry.gif
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, April 13, 2010

Hi Ricardo,

Thanks for the reply. A Quick note in response, leaving others to comment.

All the stories that I have been hearing about for a long time, plus what I read and see on the main stream media makes me very angry and that’s why I finally decided to publish this article and hope for the best.


I am angry over several other issues too!

By the way, I am not sending a copy of this article to all members of Congress in Brazil as I usually do after publishing a new article.


A waste of time sending your article to them. One of the things that made me upset was the idea of the Broad band connection you had included in your "Growth Plan" and sent it to them. The way they are handling it is a joke. I wonder if you are keeping track of the news.



...
written by mattsimonato, April 13, 2010
Who the f**k wrote this gigantic piece of jingoist s**t?

You gotta be f**king leftists, s**t. Let's hope this bucket of vomit doesn't become reality.
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, April 13, 2010
My original impulse was not to comment on this article, as I initially considered the very idea of another dictatorship absurd. I also realized my bias to Ricardo Amaral's repeated calls for a 'smaller population' through means he has yet to define, though I have asked him about this and still await his response. It has been my opinion, of which he is aware, that he chooses the military option quite regularly as a 'desirable' choice for Brazil. Given his statements concerning population and now his penchant for dictatorship, I must say that these are ideas that together I find 'troubling'...so I humbly ask everyone's forgiveness for the length of my comment.

1)What qualifications does Gen.Heleno have to hold the post of "Attorney General"? As far as I know, he doesn't hold a law degree and our OAB whiners are bound to raise hell if he is appointed.

Perhaps the post may not be "Attorney General", but the problem does require a person in position and authority to 'enforce' the Law. In the US that is the Attorney General, who has the authority and duty to even bring the President before the bar of justice for illegal acts. The world knows this has been done, even in recent US history. The US Attorney can even bring judges to justice; something I am not sure is even possible in Brazil(?). Someone 'must' be responsible and accountable for justice and the safety of the Brazilian people, and to propose that it cannot be done other than through dictatorship is a 'surrender' to the very forces that would destroy Brazilian progress. Perhaps Brazilian democracy is too immature for the requirements accorded a free people. Brazil is not China, and Mr. Amaral's admiration for their monolithic institutions I find to be immature, and of further concern in regard to his population analysis.

2)Supposing that he does hold a law degree, who will appoint him as AG?

Is is beyond the presidential powers in Brazil for the head-of-state to appoint a chief law enforcement officer subject to senate approval, or will Brazil accept that it is entirely too late for the Law? Sorry to answer the question with a question, but if the 'only' answer is dictatorship, no matter how intelligent the Brazilians may be, the world will know that they are unable to advance as a free people. What is so damning is that it would be admitting defeat in the midst of economic, if not 'shared', prosperity.

3) What if some party offers a ticket to stand for the job of the President and the Brasilians elect him as their President through the ballot?

Indeed, the ideal choice, and I would champion such a candidacy as much as I could, not being Brazilian smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cool.gif The world is quite aware of the dangers in Brazil. Everywhere there are articles about this and how Brazil will solve it(hopefully before the Olympiad). If the answer is dictatorship, please understand the disappointment of so many people around the world who are hoping for better.
An Important Tradition of the Andrada Family
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 14, 2010

Part 1 of 2

Ricardo: Honesty, high integrity and ethical standards it has been a constant feature that connects the generations of the “Andrada” Family. And we have example after example of members of our family that met these very high standards.

Here is another example of another outstanding member of the “Andrada Family”


*****


Jornal da Cidade - 16/11/2007
“Sinal dos Tempos”

Na verdade não se faz mais políticos como antigamente. Claro que, no passado, haviam políticos como os de hoje, mas, minoritários, pois na sua grande maioria eram homens de bem, probos, que defendiam princípios e que buscavam o bem comum.

O jornalista Joel Silveira, recentemente falecido, tido como o maior repórter brasileiro, nos conta em um de seus livros – e são mais de 50 – a saga de alguns políticos que não mais existem, entre eles o Dr. Antonio Carlos, da terceira geração dos Andradas.

Antonio Carlos, quando deixou o Ministério da Fazenda, isso em 1918, foi à então poderosa “Sul América”, onde era segurado, fazer um empréstimo de sete contos de réis. Observe-se que ele deixava um cargo importante. Durante a Primeira Guerra Mundial, passara por suas mãos todo o dinheiro do país. Mas saiu de lá como entrara, sem recursos suficientes.

Como é que uma pessoa que durante a guerra de 1914/1918 tivera a ordem de sacar contra todos os bancos da nação, deixava assim o posto tão ambicionado, sem fortuna e necessitando urgente de sete contos de réis?

- Quero abraçar o homem que, deixando o Ministério da Fazenda, vem nos pedir sete contos de réis. Assim disse o presidente da Sul América, Moreira Magalhães.

Meses depois, Antonio Carlos passou a fazer parte do Conselho Consultivo da empresa. Em 1924, foi escolhido para ser um de seus diretores.




An Important Tradition of the Andrada Family
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 14, 2010

Part 2 of 2

O Dr. Antonio Carlos, aos íntimos, gostava de dizer que “os Andradas nunca se preocuparam com dinheiro” e exemplificava contando o acontecido com dois dos seus ilustres ancestrais. José Bonifácio, Chefe do Gabinete, e Martin Francisco, Ministro do Tesouro. Durante uma reunião do Ministério, José Bonifácio acabara de receber os seus vencimentos e jogara, descuidadamente, o envelope dentro da cartola. Conversações, discussões e o patriarca não se lembrava mais do dinheiro recebido. Na hora de ir embora, pegou a cartola e acomodou-a na cabeça. O envelope, com os vencimentos, permaneceu dentro da cartola. José Bonifácio só se lembrou do dinheiro em casa, tirou apressado a cartola, mas o envelope não estava mais lá. Possivelmente ele, ao cumprimentar alguém na rua, deixou o envelope cair.

Ninguém sabe como, mas o fato chegara ao conhecimento do Imperador Pedro I, que imediatamente mandou chamar Martin Francisco e ordenou-lhe que pagasse novamente os proventos do patriarca. Mas, Martin Francisco, Ministro do Tesouro, não concordou, argumentando que o Estado não poderia se responsabilizar pela distração dos seus empregados. O máximo que poderia fazer, era dividir os seus vencimentos com o irmão. E assim se fez.

Dr. Antonio Carlos fez política ao longo de 45 anos. Começou na redação do Jornal do Comércio, de Juiz de Fora, tornando-se Promotor Público aos 24 anos, depois Secretário de Estado, Prefeito de Belo Horizonte, deputado estadual, deputado federal, senador, governador de Minas Gerais e presidente da Câmara dos Deputados. Aposentou-se aos 70 anos e, como ele enfatizava: “Cuido agora de mim e dos meus interesses pessoais, minha aposentadoria não pesa sobre o Tesouro, abrindo exceção a regra geral, por ter sido concedida sem pensão”.

O patrimônio do Dr. Antonio Carlos, depois de ter passado pelos mais altos cargos de Minas e do Brasil, era uma casa em Juiz de Fora, uma outra na rua Voluntários da Pátria no Rio de Janeiro, algumas ações e a aposentadoria da Sul América.

É bom lembrar que o Dr. Antonio Carlos em 1930 era Governador de Minas Gerais e foi ele quem criou e desenvolveu a Aliança Liberal, braço político que fez a revolução de 30, fazendo Getúlio Vargas Presidente da República. Há uma frase sua que criou fama: “Pode-se saber bem, como e quando começam as revoluções, mas não se pode saber nunca, como e quando acabam. Nem, sobretudo, qual o curso que os acontecimentos lhes trarão”.

Em vez de dar-lhe fortuna, a vida pública muitas vezes prejudicou seus interesses, verdade e ele dizia: “a vida pública honesta é, em regra, incompatível com os negócios e só estes permitem a acumulação de haveres”.

Os políticos de então, entendiam que prestavam relevantes serviços as suas comunidades, seja no município, estados ou no país, cuja recompensa era o reconhecimento público. Hoje é diferente: dificilmente encontra-se um homem público que, no desempenho do cargo, não tire vantagem de qualquer espécie, ora com gordas comissões, normalmente de 10%, isto quando são parlamentares e, quando executivos, o acerto é que indica o quanto.

Possivelmente há as honrosas exceções, como, em épocas passadas, devia haver aqueles que viveriam muito bem hoje em dia, aceitando pequenos e grandes “favores”.

Mas a diferença estampa-se nos detalhes. O Dr. Antonio Carlos orgulhava-se de que sua aposentadoria não pesava aos cofres públicos. Os cofres públicos não eram sangrados todos os meses, mesmo ele tendo servido a comunidade por 40 anos.

Gonçalo Mendes

Source:
http://www.jornaldacidadeonlin...dArtigo=41


*****


You can read his entire biography at:

Biography: Antônio Carlos Ribeiro de Andrada (IV)
http://wapedia.mobi/pt/Antôni...drada_(IV)

.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 14, 2010

Ricardo: Dr. Cata I will take the time to clarify for you a number of points that you made on your posting that are completely off the mark.

I need to keep in mind that I have a better grasp of the history and the times during Jose Bonifacio’s life span (1763 – 183smilies/cool.gif than most people have, including you.

The reason that I have a better understanding of that time is because I had to do a lot of research on that time period when I was writing my book about the independence of Brazil – a biography of Jose Bonifacio de Andrada e Silva.

I had to read a ton of material on that subject including the French Revolution. I had to learn as much as I could about that period to be able to understand the world of Jose Bonifacio de Andrada e Silva and what kind of experiences he had to prepare him for the outstanding job that he did during the independence of Brazil.

I am sorry to say, but based on your posting you are completely misinformed about a lot of things – but I will try my best to clarify them for you.

It is already 7 AM and I need to go to sleep right now, but I will go back to your posting and will answer your posting in due time, since it will take some effort for me to give you a proper response.
...
written by double dot, April 14, 2010
I believe "genteel" dictator Stalin was warmly called "Uncle Joe"...please poll the people of Cambodia, Chile, Argentina, Paraguay, Liberia, ect, for their fond recollections
Ricardo Amaral
written by Lloyd Cata, April 14, 2010
I am sorry to say, but based on your posting you are completely misinformed about a lot of things – but I will try my best to clarify them for you.

I surely acknowledge your proud family history, sir. I also surely acknowledge your knowledge of Brazil is greater than I shall ever have. Those are truths with which I enter this forum. Perhaps I have misunderstood the relevance between a glorious ancestry, including the founding of the nation, with the necessity for the programs and changes you espouse.

It is good of you to respond to my simple-mindedness, but I have some grasp of world history myself, and when I saw your "Overpopulated" piece it simply struck me as incompatible with 'universal truths'. Perhaps you could begin with why your excellent education provided no clue or even curiosity about the inhabitants of Brazil prior to the colonial period. It occurs to me that this could have some bearing on the attitude of Brazilians today toward the Indigenous Brazilians and their seeming status as still being 'invisible' today. After all, you ascribe the population during the 1500's as being '0'(zero?). I understand there could be no actual 'census' of such people, as many were nomadic, and basically for these 'new world' immigrants it would not have mattered given the needs of survival in a new environment. Yet, the portrayal is of a vast uninhabited land encompassing almost half a continent is somewhat disingenuous. So I ask your indulgence as I try to gather 'actual' knowledge of the period, 'inclusive' of the native populations. See my dilemma is that 'these people' did not count then, and unless I am missing something, they 'really' do not count now.

What this has to do with a 'present day' dictatorship is as baffling to me as it probably is to many in the forum, but it does clarify the situation when we define the term 'benevolent' and use it in terms of the period. In the US we know that missionaries were sent to the new world praising the 'benevolence' of Christ only to idly watch the repeated massacres of the native peoples. This is not hidden in our history or our culture. So, again I must say that 'benevolence' is an adjective that is only descriptive from the perspective of those receiving the benefit.
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 14, 2010

My original impulse was not to comment on this article, as I initially considered the very idea of another dictatorship absurd.


I would have been extremely disappointed if you had not commented. smilies/sad.gif Since Ricardo has promised to respond to your unanswered questions, I will leave that part to him.

However, I am surprised at your reaction to his article. You shouldn't be as you are an ardent supporter of Fidel Castro and many times you have expressed your admiration for his "dynasty".smilies/wink.gif

My humor apart, even though the title of Ricardo´s article is politically incorrect and absolutely shocking, the underlying message is very clear. At least to "poor mortals" like me:

In order for Brasil to become a respectable power and prosper in the 21st century, we need a "strong Leadership" that places the country´s interest above all. The current generation of "professional politicians" are a big disappointment. Most of Ricardo´s articles and comments center around this theme.

I may not agree with all that Ricardo says and we have agreed to disagree.Fine, his proposal of a "take over" Pinochet/Castro style is a bit drastic. But it is unquestionable that our Armed Forces have very good managers and it has become a pastime for the politicos and the press to bash them all the time. For this reason, no party will be willing to sponsor Gen.Heleno as a candidate and it is very unlikely that the society will support a "Take Over".

As far as I can see, the "Empire" has got its own "Laranja" candidates and as you have mentioned many times Brasil is the next "coveted prize". It will not tolerate a "Nationalistic" candidate to come in its way.smilies/sad.gif

More later.smilies/wink.gif
...
written by Ederson, April 14, 2010
I agree with Joao da Silva. As one who frequently reads this blog, I was under the impression Mr. Cata readily championed "socialists", such as Castro, Chavez, and etc. I am rather surprised at his response.
I also agree that Brazil is all too quickly becoming liberalized to the extent that honesty, integrity, and common sense are becoming ignored virtues. As with the USA, Brazil's reach for the future seems based on a lack of moral fortitude and a poorly defined sense of what is good for the people, not so much as what is good for the country. Such ideals are often difficult to put into words; thus the desperate tone to Ricardo's article.
What the world needs now, desperately, is strong leadership measured by any other means than "how's my economy" and international popularity. Ethics must account for something, as well as a need to put one's country first.
........................
written by fried CHC, April 14, 2010



E aí gringalhada das caraia?

Escreveu Não Leu…. O Pau Comeu!

Costinha




The Andrada Family - a family of revolutionaries...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 14, 2010

Dear Joao da Silva:

I don’t know if you checked the above link to the biography of Antônio Carlos Ribeiro de Andrada (IV) which is very interesting, but there is one important point about the Andrada Family that I like to bring to your attention.

Here is a quote from his bio:

Biography: Antônio Carlos Ribeiro de Andrada (IV)
http://wapedia.mobi/pt/Antôni...drada_(IV)

…Conhecido como homem gentil, elegante e habilidoso, foi secretário de Estado de Finanças no governo Francisco Sales, exerceu novamente o cargo de vereador e agente executivo (prefeito) de Juiz de Fora, que acumulou com as funções de senador ao Congresso Mineiro até 1911, ocasião em que renunciou ao mandato estadual para tomar posse como deputado federal; no governo Venceslau Brás foi líder da maioria do governo na Câmara dos Deputados. Em 1917 deixou a Câmara Federal para ser ministro da Fazenda, no governo do presidente Venceslau Brás, cargo que ocupou até 1918. Retornando à Câmara exerceu novamente a liderança da maioria no período da presidência de Artur Bernardes. Em 1925 ocupou o cargo de senador da República.

Foi presidente do estado de Minas Gerais, entre 1926 - 1930, por sua iniciativa e na sua gestão foi instituído em Minas o voto secreto. Foi o principal articulador e organizador da Aliança Liberal e um dos líderes da Revolução de 30. Antônio Carlos disse em discurso, ainda em 1929: "Façamos a revolução pelo voto antes que o povo a faça pelas armas".

Exerceu a presidência da República em 1935 ao substituir Getúlio Vargas no cargo quando este viajou ao Uruguai e à Argentina. Elegeu-se para a Assembléia Nacional Constituinte de 1933 da qual foi seu presidente, e depois presidiu a Câmara dos Deputados até 1937.


*********


As you noticed the Andrada Family and the state of Minas Gerais played an important role in the revolution of 1930 that brought Getúlio Vargas to power in Brazil.

The state of Minas Gerais and the Andrada Family also played an important role in the revolution of 1964 that brought the military to power in Brazil.

The only time the Andrada Family were not involved on these major political events in Brazil was in 1889 at the time of the proclamation of the Republic. The Andrada Family had a very close relationship with Dom Pedro II during his government period of almost 50 years.

.
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, April 14, 2010
Perhaps I have not understood, been misunderstood, or not made my analysis clear to this proposal.

My support for 'revolutionary regimes' in no way conflicts with my support of 'democratic government'. A government of the people, by the people, and "for" the people, has always been my preference and the object of my analysis. That I support these regimes has a historical and 'present' basis. That support is not in totality, nor is it without reservations and concern for those suffering under such regimes.

Certainly Brazil is faced with a difficult situation with the level of lawlessness, from the street corner to the corners of political and economic power. The drug problem has only exacerbated the problem by enslaving the poor in a vicious cycle of poverty and violence. As some would have us believe, "there are simply too many of 'them'". Not a simple problem in a country where people identify this lawlessness with the culture, saying; "That's just the way it is in Brazil". I hear that also from my Brazilian friends.
When President Lula was first elected, and in his first years, I frequently commented on his 'timidity' in leadership. Brazil certainly needed a 'firm' hand, both domestically and internationally. On the international front he has been a rousing success, and has led a vigorous agenda for Brazil's economy, but on the domestic front he has not led the nation in 'fairness' to all Brazilians, allowing drugs and violence to become staples in the society. Recently he makes noises about the corruption, "...and the band played on". Truthfully, once I understood that his talk of "Fomme Zero" was a fraud, I discontinued to identify him as a 'man of the people'. That is certainly not his legacy.

I understand Ricardo's desperation to be rid of this political showmanship and get control of these problems before they engulf the entire society in lawless anarchy. Yet he must understand that it is not only the political class that is responsible for the problem. The courts, the media, and the security forces themselves are contributing just as much to the problem. The answer is sure and swift justice, not the dismantling of the institutions of 'legitimate' government. That justice must include economic justice for the poor which has been the undeniable failure of the present government.
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, April 14, 2010

Hi Ricardo,

I don’t know if you checked the above link to the biography of Antônio Carlos Ribeiro de Andrada (IV) which is very interesting, but there is one important point about the Andrada Family that I like to bring to your attention.


I do not have to check the link, because I am aware of the history.

Antônio Carlos disse em discurso, ainda em 1929: "Façamos a revolução pelo voto antes que o povo a faça pelas armas".


He hit the nail right on the spot! There is another famous quote from Brig. Moreira Lima, which I am unable to recall at this moment. Something to do with Brasilians being "Pacific, but not submissive".

What many "outsiders" do not understand is that the Brasilian "nobility" and the Armed forces have produced very good leaders that placed the interest of the country above that of their personal one. Our fellow blogger "Ederson" spoke for us all.

You know as well as I do that the Brasilians are capable of producing anything with right kind of leadership. What really upsets me is downplaying by the media of the "Brain Power" we have and reinventing of the "wheel" by the professional politicians. One reason I don't comment much under the articles of Sen.Buarque is this.

Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 14, 2010

Perhaps I have not understood, been misunderstood, or not made my analysis clear to this proposal.


Rest assured that you were never ever misunderstood by me (I don't think by Ricardo, either), Dr.Cata. Actually, I consider you both as birds of same feather.smilies/wink.gif

"That's just the way it is in Brazil". I hear that also from my Brazilian friends.


I hate to say it, but your friends are apologizing for being Brasilians. How do you expect them to demand things from their "elected" officials?

On the international front he has been a rousing success,


Just because "Le Monde", "El Pais", "The Economist", etc; say so?smilies/wink.gif Another proof that Ricardo and you have something in common.smilies/grin.gif

I understand Ricardo's desperation to be rid of this political showmanship and get control of these problems before they engulf the entire society in lawless anarchy.


Forget that Ricardo (and Augustus) have "noble" ancestry. Take time to read "Andrada Doctrine".Very similar to "Monroe Doctrine". The difference is that you guys forgot and we still remember it. If you want to refresh your memory, please watch again the video clip of Gen.Heleno´s interview I posted. smilies/smiley.gif
The Mafia is an organized crime
written by angelina jolie, April 14, 2010
Dear Friends,

The kind of crimes being committed by the Mafia is simply devastating. I remember one Brazilian boy who told Al-Jazeera that he received his first rifle from a foreigner. The boy simply refused to reveal the hideout of the criminal gang and he allows the cast to film his rifle. It is fully automatic rifle and I am still thinking until now what on earth is that MAFIA thinking ????????Perharps all of us should look into the mind of the MAFIA and how the modus operandi put on display.........
Back up information to support the core of my above article Part 1 of 4
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 15, 2010

Part 1 of 4


October 15, 2007
Reply to AES on the comments section of Brazzil magazine after my article about China investing $ 200 billion dollars in Brazil:


AES said: “And do they not? Is that not the problem? And when under martial law the military sweeps through the government, arresting and indicting, how is this not a de facto coup d'etat?”


*****


Ricardo: I am not talking about the politicians. Politicians are crooks all over the world and that is not something new anyway since the politicians are always doing something for them to profit personally from some kind of crisis.

I am talking about urban safety in most cities in Brazil.

Runaway social violence seems to be a distinctively American phenomenon. The problem with America’s culture of violence is that it has spread like a virus to all parts of the world through “cultural” products, such as American films filled with gratuitous violence, where we find American movie heroes killing dozens of people and committing crimes that stir the admiration and imagination of adolescents. The imitation of these spectacles in real life is only a matter of time, especially when violent heroes become politicians that govern people, such as Arnold Schwarzenegger.

I remember over ten years ago when some scientists where studying the movie viewing habits of the people who lived in the favelas around Rio de Janeiro and for know one’s surprise 90 percent of their video rentals were very violent movies the type of a typical Arnold Schwarzenegger movie.

No wonder the violence started increasing in Rio de Janeiro year after year as all these people got desensitized to violence.

But the situation with the criminal gangs is getting to a critical point for example last year organized crime gangs in Brazil launched a wave of attacks on police stations and prisons over a period of few days. Almost 80 people were killed in the violence. There were riots in dozens of prisons across the country and hundreds of people were taken hostage. The attacks were ordered by criminal gang bosses, in retaliation for the transfer of more than 700 convicted gang members to higher-security prisons.

A bunch of petty criminal gangs successfully declared war on an entire modern nation such as Brazil - and decisively won the battle. Do not underestimate the empowerment and respect this has given the gang leaders in Brazil.

The First Command or the Red Command, are the two largest organized criminal gangs in Brazil and both have become major drugs cartels, using small armies to control slum districts of Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.
They are specialized in property crime, in gang rape, in drug dealing, in hijacking trucks and criminal gangs in Brazil also spend hours every day calling people at home trying to prey on widespread fears of real kidnappings.

In many cases the police is no help to the average citizen because of very low police pay, combined with an old culture of corruption, very often the serious crime problems were also those in which law enforcement officers were known to work hand-in-hand with criminal gangs to be able to make some extra income.

There is far more coverage in the Brazilian and world mainstream media about the brutal drug gangs in Brazil's big cities than about many other important social issues. And it is not unusual for the world mainstream media to portray their plight in terms of oppression and poverty.

Today these gangs reached a critical point in which their actions are affecting the Brazilian economy in a big way since a lot of people are afraid of going anywhere in the evening because they are afraid of being robed or kidnapped. It is affecting everything including the restaurant business, the movie business, and so on…

I could go on and on, on this subject but there is no point.

It is incredible to me that this criminal gang situation in Brazil it looks more like we are living in the Middle Ages than in the 21st Century.

Maybe the average Brazilian is happy with this crazy situation, otherwise we would have major demonstrations all over the country with the people demanding that the Brazilian government take some drastic measures to resolve the crime problem in Brazil.
.
Support material regarding my article Part 2 of 4
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 15, 2010

Part 2 of 4

October 15, 2007
Reply to AES on the comments section of Brazzil magazine after my article about China investing $ 200 billion dollars in Brazil:


AES said: “That by definition the massive criminal threat posed by the 'gangs' of Brazil warrent a military solution. The cancer has matasticised and must be excised before it kills us all. As to using the military to clear the Congress of those that are criminal, it was irony. And since it would involve so many it would in fact be a coup d'etat.”


*****


Ricardo: That is what I am talking about using the military to bring safety in the Brazilian cities because the gangs have taken over.

The criminal gangs are not operating only in the big cities they are destroying also many small communities for example a friend of mine has been living in one of the resort cities in the South of Brazil for the last 30 years and his city has grown a lot during that period. He has two restaurants and some other businesses in that city and in the last few years the situation deteriorate to the point that it can’t continue much longer like this.

Since the city is in a resort area during the summer months and holidays the city was like a big party with people having a good time in all the restaurants of the main avenue where you could see the ocean. People stayed out having a good time until 3 or 4 in the morning and the place looked like a big party all the time. The place was relatively safe on these days that I am talking about.

In the last few years the gangs moved in and they are destroying the entire town – people are afraid to go out after dark and there is no life left on that town in the evening the restaurants are empty after 7 in the evening and everybody just stays home because they are afraid of the criminal gangs. By the way, to make things even worse for my friend the gangs reduced the hours that the restaurant can stay open and is operating but the hours that the restaurant is open he had to add one more person to his payroll on each restaurant – he had to add a security person to stay in the door of the restaurant to keep the gangs away.

Basically his businesses are dying a slow death because of this crazy criminal gang crisis in Brazil. And once in a while the gangs tell the people in town for them to keep their businesses closed that day otherwise they would burn them down and everybody stay home that day because they are afraid of the gangs.

It is a major crisis and the Brazilian government has to do something about it.


********


October 15, 2007
Reply to Joao da Silva

You said: “What is the name of the resort City in South of Brazil, Ricardo?”


*****


Ricardo: Sorry, but I can’t tell you the name of that particular city since the gangs can destroy it in no time. I could create a major problem to them in that town even more than they already have with the criminal gangs.

If they are operating like that in that particular city the criminal gangs also must be doing the same thing to other cities in the coast of Brazil from Vitoria to Florianopolis.

People are afraid and they keep their mouth shut because they are afraid of the criminal gangs’ retaliation – these gangs are ruthless and they are getting so bold that they don’t retaliate only against you they also would not think twice about killing your entire family.

And most people feel intimidated by these gangs and they are afraid of them.
.
Support material regarding my article Part 3 of 4
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 15, 2010

Part 3 of 4

October 16, 2007
Reply to Joao da Silva

You said: “As for the tourists from Argentina to Southern Brazil, during this summer, we can kiss them good bye also. Too bad about the Commerce losing money.”


****


Ricardo: Business used to be great in that resort town, and used to be a very live town with people staying until 3 or 4 in the morning having a good time. If you looked around at 2 in the morning and did not know what time it was – you would think that it was 7 PM by the amount of people who were out enjoying themselves.

That was great for the restaurant business and the restaurant was usually full at 1 in the morning – that was the usual routine in that resort town until about 10 years ago.

Suddenly things took a turn for the worse when the criminal gangs started moving around town to prey on all this economic activity.

The town started to get unsafe, mainly after dark and from then on a small problem with the gangs turned out to become into a tsunami.

The tourism industry is the bread and butter for that community and they more or less depend on the tourism dollars for economic survival.

My friend had to lay-off some of the workers on his 2 restaurants because he closes the restaurant much earlier today because there are no customers. Most people stay inside wherever they are after dark and by 7 PM the restaurant lose most of its customers – and the main reason is because they are afraid of the criminals.

What happen to the entire community is that there is a lot less cash flow coming in all year around, year after year and this vicious cycle it has started to affect most businesses in town – and many of the young people of the new generation started moving out of town in search for a better future.

It is a disgrace what is happening in that town and everybody knows that there is no help coming from the federal government because everybody is afraid of these powerful and violent gangs.


***********


October 16, 2007
Reply to Shelly

You said: “You have to be careful, I don't like to see this sort of generalization. The violence in Rio-I am a Carioca and can speak on the subject, has roots on poverty, lack of education, lack of opportunity, lack of caring by the Brazilian government, poor wages, poor health, and the list goes on. "Let's blame on the American gun-ho society" for all our misfortunes! I agree somewhat that violent movies can increase violence, but this is by no means the sole reason for it. When you have a government as corrupt as ours, we should look within ourselves first and point the finger last.”


***


Ricardo: The problem is that American culture glorifies violence not only in their Hollywood productions but also on their daily gun-ho attitude towards the rest of the world - The bang-bang cowboy mentality.

The criminal gangs in Brazil also learn from watching the news on television – soon after they saw the gangs burning the cars in France they started copying what they saw on TV by burning cars and busses also in Brazil.

There are many causes for the increase in violence including the increase of the business of illegal drugs, and these are the major reasons for the increase in violence in Brazil.

Regarding as you said “poverty, lack of education, lack of opportunity, lack of caring by the Brazilian government, poor wages, poor health, and the list goes on” – that has been there for a long time but the poor people did not resort to widespread violence before.


**********


October 17, 2007
Reply to Shelly

You said: “Sao Paulo is seeing this surge of migrants from rural to the city-obviously, violence will result, we are already seen this phenomena in Sao Paulo.”


***


Ricardo: What do you mean will result in violence?

Sao Paulo became a violent city more than a decade ago. Every day the crime crisis is increasing and it is getting worse and worse, because the criminal gangs are completely out of control.

It’s terrible, and my family and friends, every night, they are glad when the members of their families get home safe - without being robed or worse during the day.

It’s a major crisis. And something drastic has to be done very soon to correct this situation.
.
Support material regarding my article Part 4 of 4
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 15, 2010

Part 4 of 4


Ricardo: Almost exactly four years ago we had a debate on the Elite Trader Forum about the illegal drug gangs and the chaos that they were causing in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

Since then the problem has been getting worse and the cancer has been spreading to local communities around Brazil.

You can read on the Elite Trader Forum about the discussion that we had at that time and I mentioned at that time that I was writing an article about that subject. I started writing that article many times since then, and every time I did put it aside and never finished it.

But lately I have been getting a feedback from people that I know in Brazil and I am told that even in small cities where they had almost no problem with crime over the years for the first time on their lives people who live on these communities are afraid of the crime wave that is going on.

Then I realized that I could not postpone any longer the article on that subject, and the result is the article that you are reading:


******


Here are the threads on the Elite Trader Forum with the discussion about the criminal gangs in Brazil.

By the way, my screen name in that forum is: SouthAmerica

Sao Paulo - Brazil - illegal drug dealer gangs and chaos
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...genumber=1


Lawless gangs on rampage in Brazil
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...adid=69252


PS: Dr. Lloyd Cata is going to have a lot of material to criticize me after he reads these threads at the ET forum.
.
Ricardo Amaral
written by Lloyd Cata, April 15, 2010
Antonio Carlos Andrada
( http://www.jornaldacidadeonlin...dArtigo=41 )
"They may well know, how and when they start revolutions, but you can not ever know, how and when they end."


In his own words, but I do not see a happy ending for such a proposal. It is well that the "nobility" and the generals feel the government has taken the wrong path. It is equally well that some have historically been shown to be honest men of good character. It gives them no "privilege" to usurp the rights of 'the people'. In the case of the generals; every one who would participate in such an action is by definition a liar and a thief. You can say what you want about Mr. Chavez, but the colonel waited to take his turn by the 'will of the people', the vote. As far as the "nobility", of whom I must say I have very little use for; if they do not not like what they have created, then they can take their noble asses back to Europe. An Andrada has no more standing than the least beggar in the street. That Brazilians should even consider one man over another because of ancestry only attests to the failure of your education system. Who taught you that? Why do you act that way like they are still some kind of aristocracy? Are you incapable without your masters leash. Yes, I know; he is a benevolent and kind master -- NOT! But they do know how to run a plantation, don't they? There is a psychiatric term for this, but I can't think of the name right now....

Nem, sobretudo, qual o curso que os acontecimentos lhes trarão”. Or, more importantly, what is the course that events will bring them. "

Such as drugs and violence. If I didn't know better I would suspect that this scenario has been set up and running for some time. I told you months ago that Lula had better watch those 'scoundrels' smilies/wink.gif

Antônio Carlos disse em discurso, ainda em 1929: "Façamos a revolução pelo voto antes que o povo a faça pelas armas". Antonio Carlos said in a speech, yet in 1929: "Let the revolution by the vote before the people to make the weapons."

How well he knew you, when you didn't know yourselves. How blessed is Brazil that she has no one to fight with other than herself. It would not be 1964 again. That was too easy. No, next time, thanks to the availability of so many guns...well, you see what's happening in Mexico.
...
written by Ederson, April 15, 2010
Gun violence is symptomatic of a failed system, Mr. Cata, and how typical of someone who twists logic, the truth, and history to champion a thug like Chavez as having been made "president for life" by the actions and vote of the people. If the guns are eliminated, then the drugs will stop? Will the corruption stop? If we take away the guns, will education suddenly be made available to everyone? If we take away the guns will political preference by class come to a stop? Typical socialist whitewash. Again, you miss the point. Blame guns for this, for that. surrender your rights and we will all live happily like Castro's children in Cuba. I get so tired of hearing such monolistic and crippled thinking. Tell 800,000 dead tutsis hacked by hutus in Rwanda how much safer they were because they didn't have guns. People like Mr. Cata, while decrying and blaming the presence of guns are the least likely to give the military the power it needs to guard and protect the borders to begin with. People such as Mr. Cata decry the efforts of Columbia and America to fight the drug lords and try to build an argument for Brazil avoiding such a powerful alliance out of fear that Columbia and the Yanks will mount an invasion of Rio or try and divert the Amazon. Mr. Cata, the invasion took place years ago!

You talk about coming to Brazil to escape being a Yank? Are you going to keep your socialist pandering of the oppressed at home with Obama and give thought to the needs of your country when you arrive? You don't sound very patriotic as to America, your home country; how patriotic will you be to Brazil? Your praise for the thugs of the world don't seem to give a lot of hope.

Brazil needs creativity, an opportunity to trust in the worth and devotion of its military to fight the drug invasion. Brazil needs to be wary of these endless alliances it seems to be joining. Brazil needs an opportunity to invest in itself, to be recognized as the manufacturing powerhouse it could be if it wasn't being parceled out to the Chinese. Brazil doesn't need French jets; it needs Brazilian jets. Brazil doesn't need French submarines; it needs Brazilian submarines. How can Brazil learn to run if its leaders will barely allow it to walk.

Brazil needs a strong hand to establish real priorities and instill a sense of nationalism, even if it means knocking a few heads together.
Sorry if this seems a little desperate; Ricardo's sense of urgency is contagious.
cata cata cata damnit
written by asp, April 15, 2010
chavez tried his own coup, he didnt wait his turn, and, you know that

when you say crap like that you just loose credibility by the second

nice analysis of the gang problem , amoral....except trying to blame movies as what makes people more violent in the favelas

just to remind you, these extremly violent gangs were doing serious business just about 10 years ago with another violent gang who are experts at kidnapping, thugery, violent attacks on police and military...the farc...could it at all in the most minimal way be posibel these drug gangs didnt get a few tips from the farc in how to create urban terrorism?

and cata is not a dr, see what you created , joao ...a frankenstein monster

i have received a couple of these fake kidnapping calls....pretty chilling...
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 15, 2010

Brazil needs creativity, an opportunity to trust in the worth and devotion of its military to fight the drug invasion. Brazil needs to be wary of these endless alliances it seems to be joining. Brazil needs an opportunity to invest in itself, to be recognized as the manufacturing powerhouse it could be if it wasn't being parceled out to the Chinese. Brazil doesn't need French jets; it needs Brazilian jets. Brazil doesn't need French submarines; it needs Brazilian submarines. How can Brazil learn to run if its leaders will barely allow it to walk.


My hats off to you for the eloquent comments and I wholeheartedly agree with you.smilies/smiley.gif
Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, April 15, 2010
Gun violence is symptomatic of a failed system, Mr. Cata, and how typical of someone who twists logic, the truth, and history to champion a thug like Chavez as having been made "president for life" by the actions and vote of the people.

The article was not about me or Chavez, but Brazil's answer to 'its' issues. My comment 'mentioned' guns and whenever that happens the gun nuts go ballistic. But since you insist, you may remember that there was an opportunity to decrease the availability of guns which failed. Now that the problem is completely out of hand, you turn to your 'noble' masters to save the nation. What absolute backwardness that there is no other authority in Brazil except the power of the gun, whether it is in the hands of the security forces or the criminals.

Tell 800,000 dead tutsis hacked by hutus in Rwanda how much safer they were because they didn't have guns.

Perhaps your comment should go the the French embassy so they can forward it to their UN puppets. Not to worry, presumably under Mr. Amaral's agenda Brazil can more than match Rwanda's score because in his opinion there are too many of you already. smilies/shocked.gif

Brazil needs a strong hand to establish real priorities and instill a sense of nationalism, even if it means knocking a few heads together.
Sorry if this seems a little desperate; Ricardo's sense of urgency is contagious.


Nationalism, population control, dictatorship...HHhhhmm, where have we heard 'that' before? "Knocking a few heads" will get you exactly where you have been. Perhaps those who are unwilling to champion the rule of law are afraid of the consequences of having to face it themselves. So continue in your haste and fear of the future, but I don't think it wise to join in your merry-go-round of military/civilian rule. Ce la vie! It is what it is; my 'opinion', your choice.

You talk about coming to Brazil to escape being a Yank?

"Escape being a Yank"? I am past the point, my friend, of having to escape anything. I do love Brazil, in some ways more than the US, but you may know that my ancestors were free before any aristocracy set sight on these shores. Thank God I do not need the facade of 'nobility' to understand the responsibility, truth, and dignity of all people. Should I ever venture again to Brazil, not to worry, I shall not attempt to burden you further with the truth because I see that it is a dangerous proposition in such a lovely setting. But there was a snake also in the Garden of Eden, so I am not ignorant of the limits or dangers wherever I go. smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cool.gif

Finally, a Brazil under dictatorship only strengthens the hand of those who disrespect human life around the world. Those who would advocate such a thing are simply playing on the very fear you express. As the bodies are falling you'll still be ranting about Fidel and Chavez.

To paraphrase, "To do better, first you must 'imagine' that you can do better". If dictatorship is the best Brazil can do, you will not have to worry about my presence, nor the millions of others who love and are 'trying to understand Brazil'.
...
written by Ederson, April 15, 2010
How appropriate for Mr. Cata to call someone who believes in HIS constitution, a gun nut.smilies/wink.gif
asp
written by Lloyd Cata, April 15, 2010
1) "On the day when hunger is eradicated from the planet Earth there will be a huge spiritual explosion, such as the word has never seen. Humanity cannot even imagine the emotion and happiness in the world on the day of this great revolution".

2) "There cannot be a single child abandoned in the street or anywhere. There should be no single human being left in any alley or under a bridge. It is a problem of us all”

3) "Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed".


3 quotes - one from a European, one from an American, and one from a Latin American. Perhaps when you can see past the walls of your cabana you'll be able to figure out who said what. Until then, perhaps there is better opportunity for you at pornhub smilies/smiley.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

I have been called many things, not all complimentary or true. If I should waste my time with the labels, I will never get to make my own supper.smilies/smiley.gif
...
written by Ederson, April 15, 2010
Mr. Cata, allow me to regress. At no time did I mean any insult to you or anything of the like. Indeed, it is because of you that most bloggers even pay attention to this site, for we find your opinion most interesting, and it serves as a solid board of thought for which to reflect and validate our own opinions. Indeed, your presence serves a most useful function, and if you are denied the praise you so frequently deserve, let me be the first to state that you serve in something of the advanced professor role, at least to me. While we are equals, your words are far more eloquent and deserving of the highest respect.
However, some individuals voice opinions with a certain amount of spirit, and at times they are shared opinions, right or wrong; in this case, it was Ricardo's. I believe he brought it to this blog for a certain reason, primarily because such people as you and your devoted students would listen, and he wanted your rebuttal. In another world and time, your class would stretch out out on their Roman recliners and enjoy great quantities of cheese and grapes while you offered brilliant counterpoints to their limited insights, experiences, and follies, but unfortunately, this electronic connection is the best we can do until you and your students enjoy an opportunity to debate in person.
However, as a leader and professor, you own biases are noticeably distinguished in that you prefer some sense of totalitarianism in the manner of socialist dictators, who by the very nature run afoul of the beliefs of several of your students.
For example, you constantly refer to those who believe in a citizen's right to be armed. You see it as nothing but trouble and relate such freedoms as pathways to peril. Others see the abuse of gun rights as a harbinger of disaster and neglect in the governing of a free peoples. Those who believe in guns would argue forever that gun abuse is symptomatic of the need to change things, as is any violence. In my case, I would neither enjoy being shot while being robbed or hacked to death with a machete; neither alternative gives me a great deal of comfort, but yet i don't scream atop the pulpit to surrender your machete.
Indeed, I search for an alternative and one not so easy. I would rather that the government search for solutions to national problems rather than cure a diseased spirit by soothing a resulting symptom. A prime example is what is happening in your own country at this very moment. you have a president who is trying to solve massive unemployment by farming jobs overseas, cutting back his military, his country's pride and spirit, belittling the alternative views of political opponents, as well as involving himself in a great deal of name calling, while at the same time doing nothing to address the very problem that is wracking the States, unemployment.
And I am not so certain that Ricardo is openly stating that a dictatorship is the only way so much as he is stating the obvious in that both our national leaders seem unaware of the true concerns of their respective nations. In that, Ricardo will be embraced by most followers of this blog. If his proposed solutions are valid, that awaits to be seen. In the meantime, please don't lose sight of the function you serve on this sight, as a learned, respected, and distinguished professor. Just don't be angry if at times a few of us discuss more individual opinions.
...............
written by fried CHC, April 15, 2010




WHAT THA FUUUUUU…..

All That Moaning And Groaning I Can Hear It All The Way From Here!

Would Somebody Give Mr. Froid Caca Some Vaseline?

And While You Are At It, If You See Shelly, Use Sandpaper On That Ugly Heifer!

Cheers,

Costinha
America needs a benevolent dictatorship too!
written by Daniel Garcia Romero, April 15, 2010
Funny me. I always thought America taught freedom and democracy in it's colleges. I guess I was wrong. Maybe the author should encourage a benevolent dictatorship in North America too?

As a Brazilian, I'm ashamed there are still Brazillians calling for a coup. It may not be the case of Ricardo (and probably it isn't, god help us) but the more educated the Brazilian, the more he HATES democracy. They HATE having the same rights of humble people. They don't want that. They regard themselves as better "meat". So, instead of working thru politics to solve their differences they always prefer the club and the gun. I hear this from everyone against the any brazillian goverment (I heard it in FHC era, and I hear it now in Lula era).

When are we going to face our problems instead of having someone else to solve it for us?!

So, coup done, for how long a "Benevolent" dictatorship would last? It certanly didn't work in 1964. It was supposed to be quick and painless, but it wasn't. Just hear what Gen. Nilton Cruz said recently (do you trust a brazillian military words? Hermes da Fonseca and 1910 comes to my mind...). In 68, AI-5 was a coup inside the coup. And we almost had another coup, in the end of the 68's coup, in 85! What a surprise!!!

Crime should be fought with law. Fighting crime with crime will just make us all bandits.
Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, April 15, 2010
Indeed, your presence serves a most useful function, and if you are denied the praise you so frequently deserve, let me be the first to state that you serve in something of the advanced professor role, at least to me. While we are equals, your words are far more eloquent and deserving of the highest respect.

My friend, even though I find myself unworthy and humbled by your remarks, what lifts my spirit is your assertion that we are equals. In truth it is I who appreciate 'your' participation and I would hope that one day everyone would be free and able to participate as we do. It is that dialogue which challenges that leads to solutions. You certainly have no reason, since I know you speak from your heart, to consider your words as less eloquent than mine. Sometimes the passion of the subject matter can lead even myself to incoherency, and so I must thank Mr. João da Silva for frequently reining in my own passions. His enlightenment in this forum, and his moderate demeanor often give me pause to rethink my position and my words. I cannot tell you how thankful I am for his presence in this forum.

João is probably more correct than not, that Mr. Amaral and I are 'birds of a feather' since he has suffered through our debates with humor and perseverance, and you are likely correct that Ricardo has posted this article as an agent provocateur to stir the pot. Something which is necessary if we are to enjoy the meal. smilies/wink.gif

I know it is difficult to decipher my support for truth, liberty, and equality with my support for 'some' revolutionary regimes, and I can assure you that it is not a position that I enjoy undertaking. If I had not witnessed myself the utter inhumanity suffered by many peoples throughout the world, because of the arrogance and folly of my own country then these words would sound hollow to even myself. That is not to say that the US is responsible for most of the suffering in the world, because I also know that the American people are also a generous people. Yet too many times, in too many places have I seen that generosity subverted by those in the US government.
Since joining this forum, several years ago, I have drawn attention to the plight of the Haitian people. Unfortunately, it took such a massive tragedy to open a small window to the world of how a good and proud people, who indeed 'appeared' to have independence were really still under the imperialist yoke. I would not wish that for anyone else, so I do not apologize for my support of any government to resist such a fate.
Surely Mr. Obama has his faults and because of the US system of government he cannot do as he pleases, which is the manner of democratic government. Unfortunately, I believe you have been reading to much right-wing media, because certainly he did not create the crisis in which America finds itself in today. Outsourcing of jobs is a natural progression of the absolute greed that has afflicted the American people for almost a generation now. Once the Chinese, Indian, and other economies began to thrive, and the technology was in place, American manufacturers simply sold out their own people for cheaper labor costs. That is simply what capitalists do. Right or wrong has no place on the corporate balance sheet.
There is now what I call a "violent temper upon the nation" here in the US and I would be lying if I told you I have any idea how it will end. In fact, as in the case of Mr. Amaral's position, I have myself envisioned a situation where military force may be necessary to save the nation. I am sure that will shock some and I will get ridicule from others, but we are now faced with a situation of a nation evenly divided between progress and the return to a capitalist ideology that left too many people out, lied to advance money and power, and schemed to bring war and destruction to those less fortunate. I wish it were not so, but the truth is a hard master and even I must bow in respect for its power.
...
written by Ederson, April 15, 2010
Believe me, Mr. Cata, there are many of us who wonder how in the world the US continues to function through crisis after crisis without turning on itself. You folks must be made of the sterner stuff, but something tells me that the golden days of the US are still in the future.
...
written by Luis Otávio Lopes, April 15, 2010
Are you mental ?
There are no benevolent dictatorship !!
José Bonifácio was PRO SLAVERY, and all Dictators are terrible... Shut up and think...
People like you made HITLER possible !
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 15, 2010

Sometimes the passion of the subject matter can lead even myself to incoherency, and so I must thank Mr. João da Silva for frequently reining in my own passions.


I must thank you for contributing to this forum with your words of wisdom.I wouldn't really classify you as an UnAmerican or unpatriotic, as our fellow blogger Ederson did. But..but...but.. you need some dressing down at times.smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

João is probably more correct than not, that Mr. Amaral and I are 'birds of a feather' since he has suffered through our debates with humor and perseverance, and you are likely correct that Ricardo has posted this article as an agent provocateur to stir the pot.


Finally you realized that Ricardo used the infamous "Awe and Shock" strategy to give a wake up call? The fact that he has "noble ancestry" doesn't bother me the least. Nor am I scared of the military.

BTW, I suspect "Ederson" is an active or retired officer of our Armed forces. He is a bit too harsh on the French, isn't he?smilies/cheesy.gif
asp
written by João da Silva, April 15, 2010

i have received a couple of these fake kidnapping calls....pretty chilling...


So have I. Stay cool.

Time for tea and crumpets.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
Corruption research
written by Rogerio dos Santos, April 16, 2010
Please execute a corruption research about the corruption and organized crime. You will find that the organization crime was born during the last dictatorial regime and the corruption has been increased a lot.
I agree that a dictatorial regime will decrease instantly the violence, but I cannot be agree that this will solve its roots: The huge social difference…
Rogerio
Reply to Luis Otávio Lopes
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 16, 2010

Luis Otávio Lopes: There are no benevolent dictatorship !!
José Bonifácio was PRO SLAVERY, and all Dictators are terrible... Shut up and think...


*****


Ricardo: You said: “There are no benevolent dictatorship”

You probably never heard of Singapore. By the way, last night the Prime Minister of Singapore had an excellent interview on The Charlie Rose Show and he followed the footsteps of his father another great Singaporean leader.

The Chinese have been sending a lot of people to study the Singaporean social and economic system for many years, since their system has so successful for a few decades now.

Regarding your comment about Jose Bonifacio de Andrada e Silva that shows your complete ignorance about his private and public life, and also of Brazilian history.

Maybe you are just a kid trying to write about something that you don’t have a clue about that subject.

For the people who know Brazilian history, your comment looks just silly and coming from someone who has absolutely not even the basic knowledge of Brazilian history.

You should start your education on this subject by reading the following article:

Brazzil Magazine - June 2003 -“Brazil and the Angolan Connection”
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
http://www.brazzillog.com/2003...3jun03.htm

.
The above article makes cover story headline on (UOL) website in Brazil.
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 16, 2010

Ricardo: RGE Monitor also published the above article today, and created an immediate reaction in Brazil.

A reader sent me the following email just now saying the following:

Dear Ricardo

Congratulations! The most important website in Brazil (UOL) published a cover story regarding your article.


*****


April 15, 2010

Caro Ricardo

Parabéns ! O site mais importante do Brasil (UOL) divulga seu artigo na capa !


*****


15/04/2010 - 18h49

Site do "guru da crise" divulga texto que defende ditadura no Brasil
Maurício Savarese
Do UOL Notícias
Em São Paulo

Uma das raras pessoas que ficou mais rica com a crise econômica detonada em 2008, o economista Nouriel Roubini divulgou em seu renomado site um texto assinado por um economista brasileiro que defende o retorno do Regime Militar. Para o colunista, um governo nos moldes do exercido entre 1964 e 1985 é a fórmula para o sucesso do país.

Roubini, que visitou o Brasil no ano passado, ganhou renome por prever turbulências financeiras com origem no mercado imobiliário. Em 2008, nos Estados Unidos, o banco Lehman Brothers faliu, combalido principalmente por créditos imobiliários de baixa confiabilidade de retorno, os chamados “subprime”.

O texto, assinado por Ricardo Amaral, foi publicado na quarta-feira (14) e leva o título: “A fórmula brasileira para o sucesso – ditadura”. “A fórmula brasileira para o sucesso inclui períodos de ditadura e o Brasil teve três períodos em sua história quando o Brasil se beneficiou por estar sob certa forma de governo; um regime ditatorial benevolente”, escreveu.

"Sugiro que os militares tomem o poder novamente no Brasil por meio de um golpe de Estado, porque todos sabemos que esse grande problema de criminalidade que está devastando a população brasileira não pode ser resolvido sob um sistema democrático de governo e por causa das ações que têm de ser tomadas para levar para levar a paz a todos os bairros no Brasil", continuou.

"Sob a ditadura de um político civil [em referência a Getúlio Vargas] e mais tarde sob a ditadura dos militares importantes mudanças econômicas foram adotadas e implementadas no Brasil, as quais plantaram as sementes para prosperidade econômica brasileira no longo prazo", disse.

No final do texto, o site RGE EconMonitors diz que as opiniões e comentários ali escritos “não necessariamente refletem a visão da Roubini Global Economics, LLC, que estimula um debate livre entre seus próprios analistas e a comunidade do nosso EconoMonitor”. “A RGE não assume responsabilidade pela verificação da precisão de qualquer opinião expressa por colaboradores externos”, alerta.

No texto publicado no site de Roubini, Amaral especula sobre candidatos a ditador. O administrador é descendente direto do patriarca da independência José Bonifácio de Andrada e Silva (1763-183smilies/cool.gif.

Após a publicação do texto, comentários no Twitter criticaram Roubini por conceder espaço à defesa da ditadura. O mesmo fez um blog do jornal britânico "Financial Times".

Visita em 2009

Em sua visita ao país no ano passado, o economista criticou o excesso de otimismo no Brasil sobre a crise. "Notei que parte do otimismo no Brasil tem relação com a China, e isso parece ser injustificado, porque a China está exportando menos e tem excesso de investimento em produção, que já está saturada", afirmou.

“As coisas melhoram para os que concentram dois terços do PIB global [os países ricos], mas onde alguns veem um sinal verde, eu vejo um sinal amarelo. Afinal esses dois terços estão em recessão, e os emergentes estão em pouso forçado."

Há cerca de quatro anos, quando os mercados se empolgavam com negociações em cifras inimagináveis até então, Roubini afirmou que os preços das moradias nos Estados Unidos estavam em uma espiral especulativa que acabaria afundando a economia global.

Ridicularizado na época por suas opiniões sobre o setor imobiliário, também porque os críticos se lembravam de seus prognósticos errados, ele foi ainda mais veemente nos comentários, o que acabou fazendo desse professor de 50 anos uma espécie de dono do monopólio dos alertas pré-crise.

Professor da Universidade de Nova York e economista-chefe do RGE, Roubini declarou em meados do ano passado que o crescimento do PIB do Brasil em 2009 ficaria torno de zero. A respeito disso, acertou.

http://noticias.uol.com.br/ult...rasil.jhtm

.
O seu Brasil e o nosso Brasil
written by Corredor, April 16, 2010
Caro Sr Amaral,

Creio que falo por quase todos os brasileiros quando peço que va resolver seus problemas freudianos, com os pais fantasiosos que não pode conhecer, fora do espaço publico.

Noto no seu perfil que a melhor coisa que o Sr tem a dizer sobre si mesmo é quem são seus antepassados. Provavelmente no Brasil ainda utiliza quatro ou cinco sobrenomes.

Não é, por nenhum outro parametro, um overachiever. Foi estudar onde deu, botando o dinheiro da familia pra compensar a falta de capacidade de aprendizado (não devem ter faltado bons colégios, né?). Provavelmente come em bons restaurantes fruto ainda, em grande parte, do trabalho de gente com marca de chicote nas costas. Talvez também de gente que arrisca a vida todos os dias por um salario mensal igual ao seu gasto de lazer de um fim-de-semana.

Com alguma sorte, e sem a ditadura com que sonha, o seu Brasil tera acabado em uma geração. Com mais um pouco de sorte, o Sr sera processado muito em breve por incitação ao crime e/ou apologia de fato criminoso, e não podera pisar no solo de nosso pais sem ser levado às autoridades - que, com todos os problemas, são legitimas e submetidas a controle jurisdicional.

No seu pais ideal, uma vez aqui o Sr teria toda a prataria dos Andrada confiscada pela ditadura benevolente e tomaria uns choques nos orgãos genitais, na esperança de resolver a confusão entre o sistema nervoso e o digestivo. No meu pais ideal, sera liberado em poucas horas e tera uns dois anos de burocracia e comparecimento a audiencias pela frente, sem poder voltar para a América smilies/sad.gif. O ideal seria ser obrigado a fazer um pouco de trabalho comunitario, em lugares onde vive amedrontada a gente que voce gostaria de privar das garantias constitucionais. Quem sabe a experiencia lhe faça refletir melhor sobre a função delas.

Por sorte, nossos militares são hoje mais inteligentes e preparados do que os dos seus herois de adultescencia, e também que os do seu Brasil ideal. Por sorte também temos uma sociedade civil razoavelmente decente, e partidos organizados que resistem às tentações que voce acaricia.

Que o seu Brasil descanse em paz. E que no novo Brasil haja cada vez menos lugar para gente que tem como melhor item do curriculum um sobrenome comprido.

Abraços,

Corredor
O seu Brasil e o nosso Brasil
written by Corredor, April 16, 2010
Caro Sr Amaral,

Creio que falo por quase todos os brasileiros quando peço que va resolver seus problemas freudianos, com os pais fantasiosos que não pode conhecer, fora do espaço publico.

Noto no seu perfil que a melhor coisa que o Sr tem a dizer sobre si mesmo é quem são seus antepassados. Provavelmente no Brasil ainda utiliza quatro ou cinco sobrenomes.

Não é, por nenhum outro parametro, um overachiever. Foi estudar onde deu, botando o dinheiro da familia pra compensar a falta de capacidade de aprendizado (não devem ter faltado bons colégios, né?). Provavelmente come em bons restaurantes fruto ainda, em grande parte, do trabalho de gente com marca de chicote nas costas. Talvez também de gente que arrisca a vida todos os dias por um salario mensal igual ao seu gasto de lazer de um fim-de-semana.

Com alguma sorte, e sem a ditadura com que sonha, o seu Brasil tera acabado em uma geração. Com mais um pouco de sorte, o Sr sera processado muito em breve por incitação ao crime e/ou apologia de fato criminoso, e não podera pisar no solo de nosso pais sem ser levado às autoridades - que, com todos os problemas, são legitimas e submetidas a controle jurisdicional.

No seu pais ideal, uma vez aqui o Sr teria toda a prataria dos Andrada confiscada pela ditadura benevolente e tomaria uns choques nos orgãos genitais, na esperança de resolver a confusão entre o sistema nervoso e o digestivo. No meu pais ideal, sera liberado em poucas horas e tera uns dois anos de burocracia e comparecimento a audiencias pela frente, sem poder voltar para a América smilies/sad.gif. O ideal seria ser obrigado a fazer um pouco de trabalho comunitario, em lugares onde vive amedrontada a gente que voce gostaria de privar das garantias constitucionais. Quem sabe a experiencia lhe faça refletir melhor sobre a função delas.

Por sorte, nossos militares são hoje mais inteligentes e preparados do que os dos seus herois de adultescencia, e também que os do seu Brasil ideal. Por sorte também temos uma sociedade civil razoavelmente decente, e partidos organizados que resistem às tentações que voce acaricia.

Que o seu Brasil descanse em paz. E que no novo Brasil haja cada vez menos lugar para gente que tem como melhor item do curriculum um sobrenome comprido.

Abraços,

Corredor
cata cata cata , you sippin too much vodca....
written by asp, April 16, 2010
way to duck out on the point i made...

you said old hugy waited his turn to be democraticly elected and i had to point out he had his own coup attempt....and you are ducking and weaving , stumbling and stepping on your dick, away from that because you are caught in your own excrement trying to praise this sob

this is just plain blatent bulls**t on your part, and , that is what kills me about people like you who talk in grandiose long winded terms of the threat of the empire and your defence of scum bags and their ideologies (as long as they crap on the empire, it makes them ok with you)

and them take a bow to the public and accept the titles of doctorates and degrees that are heaped on you

people, cata is not a doctor, he is not a professor , those are frankenstein monsters created by our esteemed joao da silva (way to go joao , there is a place for you in the movie industry as a publicist if you want to make the real money )

i think , cata, you have had too much tea and crumpets laced with vodca
cata cata cata , you sippin too much vodca....
written by asp, April 16, 2010
.way to duck out on the point i made...

you said old hugy waited his turn to be democraticly elected and i had to point out he had his own coup attempt....and you are ducking and weaving , stumbling and stepping on your dick, away from that because you are caught in your own excrement trying to praise this sob

this is just plain blatent pants pooping on your part, and , that is what kills me about people like you who talk in grandiose long winded terms of the threat of the empire and your defence of scum bags and their ideologies (as long as they crap on the empire, it makes them ok with you)

and them take a bow to the public and accept the titles of doctorates and degrees that are heaped on you

people, cata is not a doctor, he is not a professor , those are frankenstein monsters created by our esteemed joao da silva (way to go joao , there is a place for you in the movie industry as a publicist if you want to make the real money )

i think , cata, you have had too much tea and crumpets laced with vodca

nice to see some brazilians posting here on the brazzil dot com forum. its only been joao, amoral, and costinha , for a while now
“I must thank you for contributing to this forum with your words of wisdom”
written by fried CHC, April 16, 2010


You’re welcome… João!

Costinha
...
written by João da Silva, April 16, 2010

You’re welcome… João!

Costinha


I have known for a long time that it was you who was writing under a different screen name, Dr.Costa.smilies/cheesy.gif

BTW, how did you manage to send ch.c to a Libyan jail?smilies/wink.gif
Ricardo Amaral
written by Lloyd Cata, April 16, 2010
Que o seu Brasil descanse em paz. E que no novo Brasil haja cada vez menos lugar para gente que tem como melhor item do curriculum um sobrenome comprido.

Sir, please do not mistake my argument as a disparagement of your family or its history in Brazil's past. You are correct that as an 'outsider' I cannot possibly appreciate those accomplishments, nor can I truly appreciate the suffering of those Brazilians who daily have to cope with the present state of lawlessness within your country.

The fact that I disagree with your premise of dictatorship as a remedy for this crisis is a disagreement of the solution, and not a disregard for the problem(s) facing Brazil. I clearly recognize that those solutions are the responsibility of the Brazilian people. My opinion is just that, and no more. That I am allowed to share that opinion in this forum is truly the result of the freedom the 'we' both share. To see that freedom diminished by the dictatorship of a family dynasty, with the support of a military with a history, shall we say, less than responsible in the area of human rights, is IMHO no less a tragedy for Brazil as the present crisis. Truly, the story of humanity is that 'we' have progressed by standing up to the challenges 'we' face, rather than to surrender to the passions of expediency and backwardness.

I do commend your bringing forward this subject as a 'warning' to those inclined to continue on the present course. It is indeed their failure that has brought the crisis to this point, and they should be held accountable in the manner of 'the people', and I appreciate that this 'warning' has received broader recognition in the world community. That you did not send them 'personal notices' has in no way diminished their current expressions upon hearing the 'news'. smilies/shocked.gifsmilies/cool.gif

I must retire from this dialogue, but it is my fervent hope that others, among the 'Brazilian' audience will make their voices heard on this clearly important subject. While 'the people' can do so 'freely' in a democratic way it is my only hope that they will do so.

Obrigato
Lloyd Cata

PS - I 'try' not to indulge in the fast food and shock media aspects of the US economy, but I must confess that I do sometimes indulge in a 'particular' juicy burger, just as I have eaten other 'delicacies' on the streets of foreign venues. smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
The rise and fall of a failed analyst
written by JP, April 16, 2010
As the market edges down on this sunny London Friday, I decided it would be worth taking the time to track this fool down a bit further. Via personal links, cached webpages and comments on various pages, here's what can be learned about the author of this contrarian call:

1. He is a direct (and very proud) descendant of the very super heroes he praises (the almighty benevolent dictators). In fact, he even wrote a book about one of them with the humble title of Brazil's Greatest Man Ever...or something like that.
2. Prior to his role as a contributor to Nouriel Roubini's website, he was stalking Dr. Doom and other renowned econobloggers, advertising his amazing research on the financial sector, clearly hoping to receive a reply and an opportunity. Apparently it worked.
3. Before publishing his analysis on Roubini's, he actually published it on another publication called Brazzil magazine, where Brazilians who are sure the world has something against them come to meet. The comments section of his article on that website (by the way, they have not removed the gem yet) would be worth another FTA post by itself, if the comments weren't so sad; with such pearls as the author saying how he spent 3 months working to get this note published. Clearly this was not done on a rush to meet Dr.Doom's deadlines.
4. Mr. Amaral went to some middle of nowhere univerisity in the parts of New Jersey that are better off hidden from the rest of humanity. It is not clear if he got his PhD at the amazing local school, because he went on to work in the "international department of major global corporations". No further comments on that, your honor.
5. Net net, a descendant of military families, frustrated by his own academic failures, spends years writing doom prognostics. One day the economy stalls, he thinks he saw it first but the world isn't ready for a Brazilian Nobel-prize winner, so he toils on comment sections of famous blogs. One day he gets his break, and a lifetime of frustration and subpar performance boil over in an article that finally gets him the attention he always craved for. Look at me mom, top of the world!
The only solution to win the war against illegal drugs and the drug trade.
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 16, 2010

Ricardo: I want to bring to the attention of the readers of this article what I wrote on the Elite Trader Economic Forum regarding the subject of criminal gangs and illegal drugs as follows:

Posting on Elite Trader Economics Forum.
Thread: “Sao Paulo - Brazil - illegal drug dealer gangs and chaos”
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...genumber=2

By the way, my screen name in that forum is: SouthAmerica

Ricardo C. Amaral = SouthAmerica

Quoting from that thread:

May 17, 2006

Question from Rearden Metal: Well sure, I suppose the government could go around assassinating its own citizens... or how about just ending prohibition instead? Decriminalize all victimless activity, and see how fast the 'drug-crime' evaporates...


********


Answer from SouthAmerica: I agree 100 percent with you.

That is what I mean when I said that the only way to defeat the drug trade it is with “Economic Theory” and not with guns and violence.

How do you do that?

It is very simple – by taking away every last penny of profit from the drug trade and you would see the entire drug trade collapsing in no time.

Brazil should legalize all kinds of drugs and flood the market with all these drugs.

When you take away the profit incentive from the entire drug system – there is no reason for anyone to push drugs since there is no profit to be made.

The entire drug distribution system would collapse in no time – putting out of business outlaw guerrilla groups, gangsters, and so on.

The answer it is “NO”. The number of people in the population that takes drugs would not increase.

Today in the United States all kinds of drugs are readily available for any kid that desires to try these illegal drugs. It is easier for any kid in the US to buy drugs than to buy alcoholic beverages.

The people who take drugs today they would continue taking these drugs, and these people are the hardcore people that would take drugs it does not matter what.

In the last 30 years the United States has been fighting a war on drugs, but if you look to what has happened the amount of drugs that were able to get inside the United States to meet this drug demand it is a straight line.

Today there is as much illegal drugs inside the United States as you want - and the drug dealers have no problem in meeting the US market demand.

The number of people in prison because of this stupid war on illegal drugs it is another story – since over 1 million people are in prison because of this foolish war on drugs in the United States.

Why the drugs were always available to meet the market demand in the United States during all this time?

Profits, lots of profits – Enough profits for the people to take any risk they had to take to meet the market demand. We are talking about billions and billions of US dollars in profits.

All the US and Brazil has to do it is to legalize all these illegal drugs – and make it available to the public at a price that it is below the cost of production. Take every single penny of profit from the entire drug system and you would see the entire drug trade die a very fast death.

No profit – No illegal drug trade - and another benefit is that you put all these people out of business.

You take the profit away from that business and that business collapses in no time.

You win the war against illegal drugs with economic theory as described above and not with guns and violence.
.
RGE Monitor and massive international over reaction about the above article.
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 16, 2010

Ricardo: I am sorry to inform the readers of this web site that RGE Monitor has removed a copy of the above article from their website after the international feedback that they received regarding the above article, not only from headline cover article published on the (UOL) website, but also from an article published by the Financial Times (UK).

If you go to the link that I am giving you here, then you can read the information about the removal of my article on the RGE Monitor website, plus my comments regarding that decision by the editor of the RGE Monitor – you also will find my comments very informative.


*****


“Regarding Brazil and Dictatorship”
By: Michael Moran
Apr 16, 2010 9:37AM
Roubini.com

On Wednesday, a post on our Latin America EconoMonitor went beyond the boundaries of reasonable academic inquiry and strayed far from RGE’s ethos and focus on geo-economic analysis and market strategy. As such the inflammatory piece was removed from RGE's website. RGE reserves the right to review the quality and appropriateness of all content on roubini.com. The piece in question, in effect, called for the violent overthrow of a democratically elected government, something RGE cannot be associated with.

Michael Moran
Executive Editor
Roubini.com

http://www.roubini.com/latam-m...ctatorship

.
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 16, 2010

I must retire from this dialogue,


How dare you do it, withdrawing from the battlefield at the crucial moment? smilies/angry.gif No wonder old Saigon fell so quickly. smilies/shocked.gif

See ya at "Al Jazeera".smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
...
written by Luis Otávio Lopes, April 16, 2010
Ricardo - Your article was REMOVED

You´re just an IDIOT !!
SHAME ON YOU

Try to defend democratic values !!

IMORAL !!
asp
written by João da Silva, April 16, 2010

people, cata is not a doctor, he is not a professor , those are frankenstein monsters created by our esteemed joao da silva


Are you sure you know more about his professional background than I do?smilies/shocked.gif

(way to go joao , there is a place for you in the movie industry as a publicist if you want to make the real money )

Finally you are convinced that the Americans are not the only ones that can make horror movies
smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

BTW, is James Cameron staying in your cabana?smilies/cool.gif
Reply to JP or Just Playing
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 16, 2010

JP: As the market edges down on this sunny London Friday, I decided it would be worth taking the time to track this fool down a bit further. Via personal links, cached webpages and comments on various pages…


*****


Ricardo: Why do all that 5 minutes research and come out with your rocket scientist conclusions? - when all you had to do is go to the following website listed at the end of the article.

You can read other articles by Ricardo C. Amaral at:
Brazzil magazine - Columnist: Ricardo C. Amaral
http://brazzilnews.blogspot.com/

Maybe that was above your rocket scientist analytical capabilities.


*****


JP: 1. He is a direct (and very proud) descendant of the very super heroes he praises (the almighty benevolent dictators). In fact, he even wrote a book about one of them with the humble title of Brazil's Greatest Man Ever...or something like that.


*****

Ricardo: Your comments shows that you don’t have a clue about Brazilian history.

By the way, do you know at least where Brazil is located on our planet?

*****


JP: 2. Prior to his role as a contributor to Nouriel Roubini's website, he was stalking Dr. Doom and other renowned econobloggers, advertising his amazing research on the financial sector, clearly hoping to receive a reply and an opportunity. Apparently it worked.


*****


Ricardo: Before Nouriel Roubini became a prominent economist I had been receiving emails from RGE Monitor for many years – and one of their analysts got in contact with me to ask me information about Brazil – and I did try to help that person the best way I could with information about Brazil.

Then after one of my articles had been published on Brazzil magazine, I received an email from RGE Monitor if they could also publish a copy of my article on their website and they would give credit to Brazzil magazine the original place where the article had been published.

At that point Nouriel Roubini had been recognized as an outstanding economist, and it was an honor to have my article published also by RGE Monitor.

If you like it or not Nouriel Roubini is a leading economist today, and by calling him Dr. Doom it shows where you stand, plus the rest of your rant on this website hardly merits even a response from me or anybody else.

I never stalked, as you put it Dr. Doom, in any way or form, and you are making up things just to have material for your silly posting.

*****

JP: 3. Before publishing his analysis on Roubini's, he actually published it on another publication called Brazzil magazine, where Brazilians who are sure the world has something against them come to meet. The comments section of his article on that website (by the way, they have not removed the gem yet) would be worth another FTA post by itself, if the comments weren't so sad; with such pearls as the author saying how he spent 3 months working to get this note published. Clearly this was not done on a rush to meet Dr.Doom's deadlines.


*****


Ricardo: And this rocket scientist did not even know that he was posting his silly material on the Brazzil magazine website.

This guy is a real piece of work.

JP, I am sorry that you also suffer from slower processing skills and a reading comprehension deficiency. If you read my comments very slowly and carefully, you might realize that I wrote most of this article about 4 years ago, around May 2006, and have been procrastinating the final touches to the article and the final preparation for publication until the article got published here on this magazine a few days ago.

Nobody at RGE Monitor knew that I was going to submit this article for publication at RGE Monitor until the day they published the article on their website.

*****

JP: 4. Mr. Amaral went to some middle of nowhere univerisity in the parts of New Jersey that are better off hidden from the rest of humanity.

*****


Ricardo: FDU University is located in New Jersey, about a 15-minute car ride from Manhattan, New York City.

Right next door to that hidden place from the rest of humanity called Manhattan in New York City.

*****

Ricardo: And JP said: “Look at me mom, top of the world!” – and I am in this place that they call London, or something like that, and I have nothing else better to do than make a fool of myself on this Brazilian magazine website.

Now that I had the chance to show to the world how smart I am – a real rocket scientist – I feel better and I hope I scored some points with you mom…

By the way, my screen name JP stands for: Just Playing.
.
My final posting at the RGE Monitor website
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 16, 2010

Ricardo: I posted the following information on the RGE Monitor website to let them know that the RGE Monitor might be the first major website to publish an article the regarding a possible civil war in Brazil in the near future.

I have been told by different people living in different states in Brazil – people of a certain standing in society and I would say very knowledgeable people, that they never felt so insecure as they are today, and they are expecting the situation in Brazil to deteriorate almost overnight after president Lula leaves office in January 2011.

These people don’t know each other, but they are saying similar things such as that they don’t expect Dilma or Serra if any of these candidates are elected president of Brazil, that they will be able to stop the explosion and anarchy that might develop into a civil war in Brazil.

This is the first time that I am listening from all these people all this talk about coming anarchy and chaos in Brazil after Lula leaves office.

What is even scarier is that some people told me that this time around they don’t expect even the Brazilian military to be able to bring the coming new anarchy and chaos under control in Brazil.

I am surprised that other members on this forum did not raise the same concerns as the other people that I have been communicating with in Brazil.

The feedback that I have been receiving from Brazil for a while on this subject played a major role on the urgency of me having to finish the above article and get it ready for publication immediately.

Here is a portion of my final posting on the RGE Monitor website:

First, I want to congratulate Mr. Roubini, and RGE Monitor for the courage in publishing such a controversial article about Brazil.

I am receiving many direct emails giving me congratulations for the courage of writing that article.

All the emails I have received so far were in favor of what I said on that article.

…Once again I congratulate Dr. Roubini for the courage and foresight in designing a place where intellectual discussion takes place in an open forum, the RGE Monitor website, since I have been told over and over again that the mainstream media has been avoiding a discussion on this subject of my latest article like the plague.

I am hearing from very solid and reliable source with deep political connections in Brazil that it does not matter who is elected in Brazil in October 2010 – that person will not be able to hold things back any longer, and that after president Lula leaves office the country might explode into a civil war.

The only reason the explosion has not happened as yet, is because a huge sect of the population can personally relate to president Lula.

After president Lula leaves office in January 2011, there is a very high probability that a civil war will break out in Brazil, since he is the only reason the massive problem has not started in Brazil up to this point.

And the mainstream media are completely clueless regarding what is happening in Brazil.

Thanks again to Dr. Roubini, and I want him to know that his website is away ahead of the game, and once again he is giving important information to the world regarding a major crisis that is reaching the boiling point inside Brazil.

Ricardo C. Amaral
.
Leading economies with perfection of balance and cultural harmony.
written by Norman Copeland, April 16, 2010
Wishing Brazil the best luck...

www.spacetravel21stcentury.blogspot.com
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, April 16, 2010

I have been told by different people living in different states in Brazil – people of a certain standing in society and I would say very knowledgeable people, that they never felt so insecure as they are today, and they are expecting the situation in Brazil to deteriorate almost overnight after president Lula leaves office in January 2011.

These people don’t know each other, but they are saying similar things such as that they don’t expect Dilma or Serra if any of these candidates are elected president of Brazil, that they will be able to stop the explosion and anarchy that might develop into a civil war in Brazil.

This is the first time that I am listening from all these people all this talk about coming anarchy and chaos in Brazil after Lula leaves office.


Ricardo, I didn't get your point right. If the people of "a certain standing in society and you would say very knowledgeable" think that Mr.Lula is keeping the things under control and the chaos will break out after he leaves the office, it means that they have full confidence in and respect for him. According to our constitution, he can not run for the third consecutive mandate. However, he can stand as a vice presidential candidate in Ms.Dilma´s ticket to continue doing his good work. Then he can stand for President again in 2014 or 2018 depending on how well she performs.

For me this seems to be the ideal solution, instead of dragging the Generals back into picture. It should also please all the leaders and citizens of the "free world". You may recall that it was the solution worked out for the benefit of the Russian people. Dimitry Medvedev became the President and Vladimiro Putin the PM.

May be I am too simplistic in my thinking, but it is a food for thought. Would like some feedback from you as well as other fellow bloggers.
Reply to Joao da Silva
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 17, 2010

Joao da Silva: Ricardo, I didn't get your point right. If the people of "a certain standing in society and you would say very knowledgeable" think that Mr.Lula is keeping the things under control and the chaos will break out after he leaves the office, it means that they have full confidence in and respect for him. According to our constitution, he can not run for the third consecutive mandate. However, he can stand as a vice presidential candidate in Ms.Dilma´s ticket to continue doing his good work. Then he can stand for President again in 2014 or 2018 depending on how well she performs.


*****


Ricardo: I am trying to use a semantic that it does not start class warfare here in our forum, because some members of this forum would take it personally, and then the message that I am trying to convey it would get lost on a futile discussion that is going nowhere.

I am not trying to insult anyone on this forum with my postings, (only the people who are disrespectful and insulting to me, and I have no use for those people, and on these cases then I go for the jugular vein) or put down anyone who has less formal education than I have – I am just trying to describe a real and very serious problem that is almost getting out of control in Brazil.

I mean the people with a certain standing, meaning that they have money, some are very wealthy, and are also very well connected with the ruling establishment. Others are well connected with the grapevine of the Brazilian military. Others belong to the middle class in Brazil. But most of these people are very well educated and belong to the higher end of the middle class or they are very wealthy – they have money and land and belong to a privileged class in Brazil.

All I can say is that everybody is worried about what is happening in the lower classes in the big cities and now is spilling all over Brazil to the smaller communities. They can sense that the frustration inside these groups is reaching the boiling point very fast.

They are guessing that the reason hell did not break lose in Brazil as yet, is because the majority of these people respect president Lula and they look at him as if he was part of their social group and they can relate to him personally.

They are also saying that Lula’s charisma is not transferable to Dilma even though she is his candidate on this presidential race.

But even with Lula in office there’s the possibility that any unexpected event in Brazil can spark a major crisis inside Brazil, and explode into a civil war.

As far as I understand the current situation is so volatile inside Brazil as never seen before, and the people are worried, scared for their families and relatives, and they feel a sense of insecurity in Brazil that they have never experienced before – and Brazil had some though times before, but this time around what people are witnessing is just the tip of the iceberg of things to come.

I am not sure myself that even if Lula is part of the presidential ticket in 2010, that this would make the difference in the coming years.

You have been reading my postings on Brazzil magazine for a while and know that I admire president Lula and I think his administration did a good job in the economic area, in managing the Brazilian economy, and he helped lift millions of boats in Brazil in the 7 years of his administration.

I know I have a sharp tong, and I take no prisoners, on my articles and on my postings on various economic forums, but you can read all my articles published in the last 7 years, and will not find anything criticizing president Lula and his administration, other than the area related to the criminal gangs, and illegal drug trade in Brazil.

In most of my articles I have been making proposals on how to improve Brazil, economically and socially and turn it into one of the best countries in the world.


*****


Joao da Silva: For me this seems to be the ideal solution, instead of dragging the Generals back into the picture.


*****


Ricardo: I like the idea of the generals in charge, because I believe in Brazil developing the Armed Forces in Brazil comparable to the best armed forces of the elite countries of the world, and Brazil should take its place among the leaders of the 21st century regarding the new world order.
.
Ricardo!
written by John Lloyds, April 17, 2010
Ricardo is a person who chooses to live in USA, a land of freedom. He is not living in Brazil, a land which he thinks should be governed by dictator!
Since Ricardinho answered...
written by JP2, April 17, 2010
Mr. Amaral, I am Brazilian and I posted the initial comment on the FT website, and simply re-pasted it here, in English, to keep consistency. Surely something you know nothing about, given the rationale of your analysis. Let's go point by point:

JP 1. Yep, I know where Brazil is at, I go back every year. And I still can detect "um milico safado" (sleazy military) from a mile away.

JP 2. Sure, your relationship with Dr. Doom (which is the title given to him by the media, and which he appreciates) is so tight that he kicked you off his blog the minute you posted your rant. Shows how the quality of your work is truly appreciated by the man. I still believe you didn't deserve his attention, and if they did contact you it was a mistake (now corrected). Much more plausible to believe you begged your way up.

JP 3. Sorry I didn't have the stomach to read you full text to see that it had been brewing for 4 years. It clearly shows that only wine gets better with age.

JP 4. Niteroi is 15min away from Rio and it's still not cool, and cariocas still try to hide or deny they come from there. New Jersey is worse than Niteroi, however you look at it, so clearly it - and your obscure school - are better off kept under the carpet. Like your thoughts and analysis.

My quote on "Look at me mom..." is one of the most famous movie quotes ever, which any self-respecting English-writing author should know. Your ignorance - and your unfunny momma-style jokes - only highlight how shallow your skills are. Surely you can piece facts together to tell a compelling story, but lack of cultural background and biased analysis don't cut it in the real world boy. That's why you publish in Brazzil magazine and Dr.Doom kicks you off his blog (I mean, you collaborated, not worked for him).

And yes, JP means "Just Playing" in your case because you can't be taken seriously.

Cheers,
How Ricardo Lies
written by JP3, April 17, 2010
Today is saturday and, as I sit here in Hyde Park in London, enjoying the beautiful sun and my wireless broadband connection, I will indulge in my favourite pleasure of denouncing illogical analysis. Today I pick the infamous author of the week, Ricardo Amaral. Mr. Amaral, enjoy your 15 minutes of fame (or infamy?) while they last. This is the pinnacle and the beginning of the end of your career as an analyst,let's see why. Examples of Ricardo thinking below:

1. "everybody is worried about what is happening in the lower classes in the big cities". This is clearly not true, or else they would be doing something. People are not worried about the lower classes, they are afraid. If they cared they would help or demand more from the state. People just want more money for themselves, they don't care about the poor.

2. "the reason hell did not break lose in Brazil as yet, is because the majority of these people respect president Lula ". Amazing, when did you run this survey? I don't believe this. to me the answer is simpler; Lula helped the poor more than any president in history. Poor people now have more jobs and more buying power, and that's why they're more stable.

3. "even with Lula in office there’s the possibility that any unexpected event in Brazil can spark a major crisis inside Brazil, and explode into a civil war". Yeah, right, Brazilians are very politically engaged people, with a history of organizing politically and creating trouble. Even the "Diretas Ja" movement took a long time to happen despite a weakened military regime. Today, with more jobs and more money in their pockets, I can't imagine any situation that would lead to civil war.

4. "As far as I understand the current situation is so volatile inside Brazil as never seen before". Really? Is crime going up everywhere? Or is the media reporting it more? Get the data and think for yourself; stop believing in what Rede Globo wants you to believe.

5. This is my favourite guys: "I like the idea of the generals in charge, because I believe in Brazil developing the Armed Forces in Brazil comparable to the best armed forces of the elite countries of the world, and Brazil should take its place among the leaders of the 21st century regarding the new world order". Well, well, well...the new world order. In case you missed the boat on this one, the new order is about knowledge, capital wealth and productivity. All of these are antonyms of a military regime. Moreover, small countries with strong militaries tend to isolate themselves, in their belief that they are big boys, with big guns, that deserve big respect. Surely, a mightly military is necessary (unfortunately) for a leading presence in the world. However, this is a result of economic success, not the cause. Otherwise, North Korea would have a seat in the IMF and at the UN security council.

There you go, my guilty pleasure: bashing amateur, biased, unfounded analysis. And, I mean, all this gold came from just one post! Imagine if I had read more, or even the entire (boring) piece on dictatorship in Brazil. Endless pleasure!

Thanks Ricardo, I will come back every time I need an ego boost. Reading your posts makes me feel very smart. I hope everyone else feels the same.

Cheers
Last comment for today...I promise
written by JP4, April 17, 2010
Ricardinho,
I have a great idea for you. Sinnce you are so sure that after Lula leaves there will be civil unrest in Brazil, I suggest you include a clock on your website, counting the time (in minutes, days, years and decades) between the innauguration of the new president and the beginning of the revolution.
Of course, you have to explain the methodology to define what is civil war. I mean, Rio de Janeiro already lives in civil war with constant presence of the military, so that doesn't count. Sao Paulo has already been terrorized by the PCC a few times, and life went on as usual, so that doesn't count either.
I assume you are suggesting that the poor will get out of their houses and march on to Brasilia holding hands with the middle classes, in order to demand a better life. Or will they destroy the Congress? Or take over Rede Globo (I would enjoy that one!). So, intead of sowing the seeds of fear, how about you define exactly what you think will happen, and how it will play out?
Once you have defined that clearly, with facts and not based your very own opinions (and those of your like-minded friends that take the time to email you), then you can start the clock. I suggest you get a chair so you can sit down while you wait for it to stop couting and the revolution to take the streets.
Put your money where your mouth is.
...
written by luis otavio lopes, April 17, 2010
Aproveite seus 5 minutos de infâmia !!
Financial Times article about the above article published by Brazzil magazine and RGE Monitor
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 17, 2010

JP: Mr. Amaral, I am Brazilian and I posted the initial comment on the FT website, and simply re-pasted it here, in English, to keep consistency. Surely something you know nothing about, given the rationale of your analysis.


*****


Ricardo: Here is the article published on the Financial Times (UK) on April 15, 2010 regarding my article published here on Brazzil magazine and also on RGE Monitor.


***


Roubini’s bad call: a Brazilian coup d’etat
By: James Mackintosh
Financial Times (UK)
Published: April 15, 2010
http://blogs.ft.com/ft-dot-comment/


The article shows a copy of the article published on RGE Monitor, and you can read it at:

http://74.125.113.132/search?q...=firefox-a

The Financial Times article also said: “Mr Amaral even recommends General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira, commander of the UN Stabilisation Mission in Haiti, as a possible candidate.”

I guess the person who wrote the article on the FT did not do his homework properly, since General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira has not been the commander of the UN Stabilisation Mission in Haiti for a while.

So much for credible research regarding this article…

The article also said: “This comes after hagiographies of the last three “benevolent dictators” of Brazil, who he credits with laying the groundwork for Brazil’s economic success.”

I guess the Financial Times analyst has no idea that Petrobras, Embraer, and the ethanol programs in Brazil were fruits of the periods that Brazil were under the power of dictators, first Getulio Vargas, and later the Military dictatorship.

Today, the Brazilian economy does not suffer as much as other countries from the constant instability related to the price of oil, because the military dictatorship (1964 – 1985) had the courage and the foresight to change in a drastic way the dependence of Brazil on imported foreign oil.

The military government that had the foresight, and created the incentives for this important change in the Brazilian economy – going from a 90 percent dependence on imported oil during the oil shock of 1974 to a country that export oil in 2008.

Today the oil shocks and constant price increases in the price of oil it does not affect the Brazilian economy as it affects the economy of most countries around the world.

The big successes that have been achieved in the last 60 years in the Brazil regarding its economy such as Petrobras, Embraer, and the ethanol-based economy are all fruits of periods of dictatorship in Brazil, and if you anybody contest that fact then he is completely clueless about what makes the foundations of the Brazilian economy.

Regarding his comments about Jose Bonifacio de Andrada e Silva I will write further comments to clarify to the readers some facts regarding that period of time in Brazilian history. (The author of the Financial Times article certainly has no idea of Brazilian history.)

The Financial Times is a newspaper which I have the highest regard for that publication, and read it on a daily basis, and I sent a recent note to Martin Wolf (the chief economist and at that newspaper) saying that on my opinion and experience over the years the Financial Times have been a superior newspaper when compared with the Wall Street Journal, and that many of their writers spot trends and have a grasp of economic changes way ahead of the Wall Street Journal.

Mr. Wolf wrote back thanking me for the note, and I have been writing for years that Mr. Martin Wolf is among a very short list of economists that I read on a regular basis, and I respect his opinions.

Since the Financial Times is a newspaper specialized on economic matters, I am going to send a note to Mr. Wolf asking him why he allow such a blog to be published on the Financial Times. Because in economic terms the period of dictatorship in Brazil brought major beneficial changes to the Brazilian economy time after time and we can say that during these periods they planted the seeds that great the prosperous foundation of the Brazilian economy that we are getting the fruits today.

The Financial Times more than any other newspaper should have the understanding of how beneficial to the Brazilian economy were all these periods under a dictatorship type of government in Brazil. They made the hard decisions that had to be made and they followed up with a plan and strategy to implement the changes for the better and changes that would not have happened under a democratic system ruled by the people who want to keep their old self-interest systems going forward at the expense of real progress for Brazil.
.

Financial Times (UK) - my posting on that newspaper on August 28, 2005
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 17, 2010

Ricardo: By the way, regarding the Financial Times (UK) – when the whole world as glorifying Allan Greenspan as a God and Legend of the Fed and Wall Street I wrote the following and posted on the Financial Times website on August 28, 2005 as follows:

FT: Question asked in August of 2005 by The Financial Times (UK):
Is Bernanke the right choice to replace Greenspan?

Ricardo: Here is my posting regarding that question:
Alan Greenspan a legacy of debt during his 18-year watch
by Ricardo C. Amaral
http://comment.ft.com/2/OpenTo...105433&p=2


*****


Ricardo: The Financial Times has removed that information from their website since that time, but I had posted a copy of the information on the Elite Trader Economics Forum at:

You can read the entire posting at:

June 3, 2009
SouthAmerica: Reply to PraqmaticIdeals

You said: “Blame the fed...”

Here is a piece that I posted on the comments section of the Financial Times (UK) about 4 years ago.


*****


FT: “Alan Greenspan a legacy of debt during his 18 year watch”
by Ricardo C. Amaral - 28 Aug 2005 07:04 AM .
http://www.elitetrader.com/vB/...genumber=3

.
Correction to above posting
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 17, 2010

Since the Financial Times is a newspaper specialized on economic matters, I am going to send a note to Mr. Wolf asking him why he allows such a blog to be published on the Financial Times?
Just one thought for you Ricardo
written by JP, April 17, 2010
The whole world grew tremendously in the 1960s and 1970s, the golden age of your dictators. They did nothing more than their job, building the infra-structure that the country needed. Of course in more than 20 years in power they did do a few things right, but claiming the country grew because of them is completely ignoring what was going on outside the country. Please also remember that they did all that with debt, which was cheap at the time. The the oil shocks came and the military magic finished, leaving the country broke and economically ruined with hyper inflation for 20 years.
So let's not confuse things. Yes, they did some things right, but anyone would have built infrastructure anyway. And the price we paid for the way they did things was too high....20 years of stagnation. No need to get into the human rights issues to make a clear case of why the military were a disgrace to the country.
Listen man, you can quote all the economic stats in the world, but when you put it in context of how much others were growing, and how other countries expanded after the oil crises, you see why the generals were terrible administrators. They are good at following orders, not thinking ahead.
As for your comment on the FT, good luck. The blog is free and nobody has to know hundreds of years of financial history to see that your analysis is weak and biased. I can see Martin Wolf reeeeally upset when he reads your email.
Wow !!!
written by Breckenfeld, April 17, 2010
Ricardo Amaral!!

Some years ago you wrote a preposterous article about the "need" of Brazil to have the bomb. Now,you have surpassed yourself by "proposing" a return to a "benevolent" dictatorship in Brazil.


There's no such a thing. You'd better try to write something not so insane about the upcoming Soccer World Cup in South Africa...


LOL!!!
2010 World Cup Champion = Brazil
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 17, 2010

Reply to Breckenfeld

On the day that they decided the groupings for the teams regarding the 2010 World Cup in South Africa I wrote the following:

I am not sure which team will be playing Brazil in the World Cup final? - Spain, or Italy or Germany.

But I am almost 100 percent sure which team is going to win the final game – BRAZIL.

.
JP the rocket scientist with new found Googling expertize....
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010

JP said: Today is saturday and, as I sit here in Hyde Park in London, enjoying the beautiful sun and my wireless broadband connection, I will indulge in my favourite pleasure of denouncing illogical analysis.


*****


Ricardo: JP is enjoy himself and thinking how smart he became almost overnight: I am a Brazilian and somehow I managed to land in this place called London – And now that I am so smart and even know how to Google information in the internet then everybody is going to get impressed with my analytical capabilities, and I am going to sit here with my wireless broadband connection and show to the world how smart I am. I am great thanks to Google and my Gloogling expertise.


*****


JP said: Today I pick the infamous author of the week, Ricardo Amaral. Mr. Amaral, enjoy your 15 minutes of fame (or infamy?) while they last. This is the pinnacle and the beginning of the end of your career as an analyst, let's see why. Examples of Ricardo thinking below:

… One day he gets his break, and a lifetime of frustration and subpar performance boil over in an article that finally gets him the attention he always craved for. Look at me mom, top of the world!


*****


Ricardo: You little s**t you are a real pathetic fool, who could not find information about my background that was all along right under your nose. And you have the balls to think that you are so smart. You are just an incompetent smart ass and nothing else. With your analytical ability you could not discredit even Bernie Madoff even with all the information that you probably would try to Google from the internet.

.
JP here are a few clues about my background and experiences Part 1 of 2
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010


Part 1 of 2

JP, since you were trying very hard to find anything about my background and experience, you can start by reading here on this thread some of the information, but first you need to Google the name of John Marks Templeton, since I bet you don’t have a clue who he was.


In Memorium: John Marks Templeton
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...genumber=1


*****


JP, since you don’t have a clue how people build a reputation and credibility over a period of time, then I am going to take you to school, and at least you should have the courtesy of reading the information as follows:

How to build real credibility?

You write about things before they happen!

Here are a few examples:


1) Here is a copy of the letter to the European Central Bank from Ricardo C. Amaral:
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...adid=49981

…December 12, 2001

Dr. Willem F. Duisenberg
President
European Central Bank
Postfach 16 03 19
D-60066 Frankfurt am Main
Germany

Dear Dr. Duisenberg:

… Probably today, there is an oversupply of US dollars outside of the United States. Gold at US$ 295/oz might be undervalued when compared to the US dollar.

…Gold and the euro will became increasingly important parts of the international monetary reserve system and their gains will be at the expense of the US dollar.


*****


2) Here is another example for you, I wrote an article in December of 2004 predicting the financial collapse during the summer of 2008, and I even gave the readers what would be at the core of the collapse and financial meltdown – the derivatives market.


…April 11, 2008

SouthAmerica: Just a Reminder: It is worth reading the enclosed article that I wrote in November/December 2004 making an economic forecast through the end of 2008.

I wrote the enclosed article right after the November 2004 presidential election and the article was finally published in February 2005. My mindset has not changed since that time. Maybe you will find interesting that particular article, since I wrote the article from the point of view of November 2008; forecasting the coming worldwide economic depression.

Published on February 13, 2005 on Brazzil magazine.
It’s 2008. The U.S. Has Dragged the World into a Depression.
By Ricardo C. Amaral
http://www.brazzilmag.com/comp...ssion.html


****


JP, this is a piece that I wrote at the time when an important member of our family died


Olavo Egydio Setubal, chairman of Banco Itau Holding Financeira SA
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...did=134934

… Mr. Setubal was a great-grandson of Francisco Antonio de Souza Queiroz - the Barao de Souza Queiroz

And his grandfather was the oldest son of the Barao of Souza Queiroz – Francisco Antonio de Souza Queiroz Filho.

My grandmother’s father Carlos de Souza Queiroz also a son of the Barao of Souza Queiroz was the youngest brother of Francisco Antonio de Souza Queiroz Filho.


*****


JP, you should also read this article since you will find further information about my background. I don’t know if know anything about Globo TV Network, but I am sure you can Google the info on the net with your expertise.

Brazzil Magazine - August 2003
“Roberto Marinho – The Most Powerful Man in Brazil”
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
http://www.brazzil.com/compone...3/883.html

.
JP here are a few clues about my background and experiences Part 2 of 2
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010

Part 2 of 2

JP, in case you don’t know Angola is located in Africa, it is close to the Congo, and facing the Atlantic Ocean.


Brazzil Magazine - June 2003
“Brazil and the Angolan Connection”
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
http://www.brazzillog.com/2003...3jun03.htm

…Finally, Peace in Angola

Over the years I had the opportunity to do business with an Angolan state company and with the Angolan government in New York. During this process, I had to learn about Angolan history to better understand the Angolans and the issues that caused them to get into their situation of a civil war.

In April 1992, I sent a proposal to the Angolan Ambassador to The United Nations, giving them a plan of action, and the steps necessary for them to develop investment opportunities in Angola, and bring in the necessary capital to help them develop their economy. In June 1993, I had the opportunity to meet in New York Mr. Emanuel Moreira Carneiro, the Angolan Finance Minister.

The economic plan covered the development of telecommunications, ports system, rail system, road system, agriculture, the timber industry, and further development of their natural resources (oil, diamond, iron ore, manganese, copper, gold, zinc, tin, lead, uranium, quartz, marble, granite, phosphate, fluorite, sulfur, mica, gypsum, feldspar, kaolin, talc, etc.). The plan also included further development of their fishing industry, since fish were abundant in Angolan waters.

The plan described strategies that would have helped rebuild the infrastructure of the country. The project was terminated because of changes in the government and the further escalation of the Angolan civil war at that time.


*****


JP said: Mr. Amaral went to some middle of nowhere univerisity in the parts of New Jersey that are better off hidden from the rest of humanity.


*****


JP, please read this you fool.

Brazzil Magazine - September 2001
“The B-Files” - “The Brazilian Cultural Society”
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../6752.html

My friend former president Jose Sarney…


*****


The Sustainable Development Forum 2007 - Ethanol and Biofuels
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...adid=93388


That event was organized by Mario Garnero, former president Jose Sarney was a keynote speaker, there were 10 governors of Brazilian states including Aecio Neves the governor of Minas Gerais, and the governors of the following states: Mato Grosso do Sul, Mato Grosso, Amazonas, Pernambuco, Santa Catarina, Sergipe, Parana, Rio de Janeiro, e Piaui, and also Paulo Bernard Silva the Brazilian Planning Minister.

Even though this was an event organized by Brazilian companies – I was invited to that event by The Bahrain Petroleum Company.

In our table we had our host Sheik Salman Bin Khalifa –Chairman of Bahrain Petroleum, his cousin Sheik Al-Kalifa Chairman of Bahrain Airlines, the Ambassador of Bahrain, and a representative of the government of Saudi Arabia. Sheik Salman’s father is the Prime Minister of Bahrain, and he is also a first cousin of the Emir of Bahrain.

Former president Bill Clinton gave a speech during the lunch hour and… The final speaker of the day was former president George H. Bush – the father of the current president.


*****


JP, here is another one for you.


Dear Saudis, Play Safe, Bring Your Money to Brazil
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...adid=50800


…June 13, 2005

SouthAmerica: In June 2003, I wrote an article regarding “Brazil and Saudi Arabia” that caught the attention of the Brazilian State Department in Brazil. As soon as the article was published on Brazzil magazine, on the same day, the Brazilian government posted a copy of my article at the Brazilian State Department’s website in Brazil.

Later, I also found out that my article had been circulated among members of the Saudi Arabian Royal family, and also among senior members of the Saudi Arabian government.


*****


JP, you also can read on the ET Forum what I have been writing about Goldman Sachs for the last year and ½, you will find that this thread has very interesting info about these scoundrels. I started this thread and posted a lot of information for the other members of the ET Economics Forum.

Goldman Sachs is it a Cancer or just a Parasite of the US financial system?
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...did=195957


My screen name on the Elite Trader Forum is: SouthAmerica

Ricardo C. Amaral = SouthAmerica

.
My final message for JP
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010

JP, when you said: “Mr. Amaral, enjoy your 15 minutes of fame…”

You made me laugh of how ignorant and silly you are, and you are nothing more than a pretentious little s**t with a wireless broadband connection who just learned how to Google on the internet, and believe that this is enough to make you a hot shot.

Please go and do your Google analysis and discredit people somewhere else with your expert Gloogling abilities.

.
Tim Maia was right...or, Amaral ta mal
written by The last JP, April 18, 2010
Mr. Amaral,

Thanks for elucidating on your stellar record of meeting friends of important people or attending events where famous people speak. It takes a special man to attend events and listen to people talk...let alone sit in the same table as foreign dignataries. I mean, there is no way on earth that you would have been invited to such prestigious events if it were not for the quality of your writings. I look forward to seeing your papers discussed at the IMF.

Tim Maia once said that in Brazil "dealers do drugs, prostitutes fall in love and pimps get jealous". In interpret this as an example of an important Latin trait: we get involved, take it personal, and really believe in what we do. This applies 100% to you: you really believe you are ahead of the curve, relevant, credible, and just outright important. Your links and amazing stories of meeting Saudis (wow!) and seeing US presidents presidents (amazing!) mean nothing to an outsider, but to you they validate your perception of who you are or should be; someone important, smart, relevant, pushing the global agenda.

You kinda had a shot there, publishing at Roubini's. However, as soon as your true opinions were published, you got kicked out. That should tell you that you are none of the things above, because if you really had that much useful insight you would be rich, famous, or both by now. Clearly, your analysis is perfect for what you do: meeting people over dinner tables and making seemingly interesting conversation.

I had no hope you would answer my posts, and for your attention I thank you. When I read the few paragraphs I could of your dictatorship story, I wondered what kind of person would write that, and why would you think such things. Now it is crystal clear to me: that is the work of a delusional little man, with half-assed academic credentials who sits in front of his computer thinking how he can get the world to listen to him.

All in all, you are just another conspiracy theorist living in your own little bubble, blown up by supportive emails from your reactionnary friends. Nietzsche said: there is no truth, only interpretations. In that case, I am sure you will continue leading a very happy life in your make-believe world. I can't believe you even consider yourself to have a reputation...

For that, I shall stop my postings regading you forever. It is pointless to try to bring reality home to you. If you are a real man, my challenge still stands: set up a clock to count the time it will take for a revolution to take place in Brazil. Make sure it has a big display.

For the future, I wish you no less success than you already have.

Cheers
"Shorting" Brazil - A Clever Scheme By Ricardo Amaral (Act I)
written by Lloyd Cata, April 18, 2010
There are not many persons who are familiar with the term 'shorting', but a simple explanation would be synonymous with betting the shooter will not make his numbers in a dice game. This is why I continually refer to the financial markets as a 'casino'.
That is the essential case presently against Goldman Sachs today. They sold to 'customers' items that they analyzed and valued at a specific price, knowing that there were defects in the 'product'. They then used their position of 'knowing' the real valuation of the product to take 'bets' from 'clients'(hedge funds) on the failure of the product. If that wasn't bad enough, they then 'insured' these 'products' with AIG.

The 'product' essentially failed and the 'customer' was left with only the 'scrap value' instead of what Goldman sold as an 'investment grade' product. The 'client'(hedge fund) was rightfully(?) paid off on a 'winning' bet. Thus the hedge funds made enormous profits on their 'bets'. That's what casino's are for, no? Goldman Sachs of course 'demanded' that AIG pay out the 'insurance policy' which it had taken out on the defective product. Even though it had sold the 'product' to its customer, it insured that very same product on its own behalf. AIG having set up, unwittingly(?) a 'special unit' just to take these 'bets' from world-wide investment entities, was obligated to pay the insurance.
I can only hope that the audience is still with me. Goldman Sachs, the customer, the client, and AIG being the characters of the 'first act' in this crisis.

In the structure of insurance companies, they are not required to actually have on hand all the money to pay out all their insured customers. There are such things as 'actuarial' calculations which allow them to calculate what their exposure is to the 'things' or people they insure. No insurer can possibly envision or account for 'all' their customers dying at the same time. Such a thing would amount to 'one' insurance company insuring the lives of everyone in New York City only to have the city hit by a nuclear weapon. Yet, that is 'exactly' the situation that AIG found itself in, as the 'only' insurer of 'the investment houses' before the financial crisis. Naturally, no insurer could afford such a catastrophe.

"Shorting" Brazil - A Clever Scheme By Ricardo Amaral (Act II)
written by Lloyd Cata, April 18, 2010
So AIG has 'insured' the 'investment community' not only of the Wall Street firms but around the world, thus the placement of the 'insurance unit' in London.

The collapse of the 'housing market' and the resultant collapse of the 'investment instruments' based on that market led to a complete shutdown of the casino with no one willing to bet anything for any odds. Thus a complete shutdown of capital flows. A situation putting the world economy in a coma, close to death.

Enter the US government(stage right with Bush as POTUS). No one in America can forget the morning Bush exited the White House to inform the American people, and the world, that the economic system was on its death-bed. The capital markets were frozen and money would not flow around the world until the situation could be remedied. It was the responsibility of the US government, and by definition, the American people to 'fix' the problem. That fix was 'negotiated' by the the US government and its financial regulatory institutions, with a gun at the head of the American people. There was little choice, we were told, other than to bail out the insurer(AIG), 'cover the bets'(hedge funds), and save the 'customers' of Goldman Sachs, i.e. the American people. The price tag for such an endeavor, though astronomical, was structured and sold as the 'only' alternative to complete economic depression. Thus the US government did abdicate it economic authority to Goldman Sachs, and handed the credit card of the American people, through the US Federal Reserve, to Wall Street. A situation that has essentially bankrupted the American people. A bankruptcy that was undeclared only through the massive borrowing of liquidity in the world markets, mainly China and other 'solvent' economies. A bankruptcy avoided by financing, through the 'future earnings of generations' of the American people, their children, and their grandchildren. The mechanisms of that financing still to be totally resolved and the payment terms still to be negotiated. So the casino that is the Empires economy was allowed to reopen and, although with renewed financing, under the same rules that allowed it to produce 'defective products'. It is under these same rules that the investment houses are still allowed to 'short' or bet for or against investments, economies, and countries. There are no new rules against such behavior, nor are there restrictions on the abuse of existing regulations to enrich those responsible for the crisis.
Amaral's Point
written by George Washington, April 18, 2010
Despite the historical window dressing in this pompous article, Ricardo has a basic point: Brazilians are too dumb to function in as a free society, have proven capable of f-ing up a chance at democracy. Right on.
"Shorting" Brazil - A Clever Scheme By Ricardo Amaral (Act III)
written by Lloyd Cata, April 18, 2010
Enter a little known, though connected and ambitious, Brazilian economist Ricardo Amaral, who through distant family history and current affairs knowledge, pictures himself as the inherent voice of Brazilian leadership.

It would not be the first time economic prognosticators have used the media to influence economic policy and national sentiment. We now know that economists of higher intellect, influence, and authority have been completely wrong in their analysis of economics. What Mr. Amaral would have us believe is that his familial ties are determinant and outweigh any argument against his prognostications. 'That' is why he continually refers to his family history, such as it is. 'That' is why he continually refers to his 'connections', even to sit in the presence of such intellects, as proof of the infallibility of his ideas, such as they are. 'That' is why Mr. Amaral continually props himself up as among 'the smartest guys in the room', in recognition of the boys at Enron.
It is with this understanding of markets and market forces that Mr. Amaral calls for dictatorship in Brazil. He is in effect 'shorting' Brazilian democracy. He is 'betting' that democracy in Brazil will not survive the exit of Mr. Lula from Brazil's leadership. Along with his supposed influence and imagined cohorts in Brazil, he is trying to convince 'the markets' that his 'scheme' to overthrow the legitimate government of Brazil has some legitimacy and/or probability in the future of Brazil. In doing this he has incorporated to assistance of well known persons and publications in this scheme. That they are beginning, as in the case of Mr. Roubini(Dr. Doom), to deny any involvement in such shenanigans, is noteworthy, but does little to decrease the specter of possibility planted in the market mentality. Any occurrance between now and the Brazilian elections that would reinforce such radical thought would justify others to 'short' their positions on Brazil.

I will end this by advising Mr. Amaral that there are Laws against what he has done, if he indeed possesses the influence that he so proudly claims. Though somewhat knowledgeable in economics, I would sincerely advise Mr. Amaral to familiarize himself with the Law. I am sure a wise councilor will advise him to shut up and not bring considerably more attention to his scheme. Certainly there are those in the investment community, and among 'free' Brazilians, who neither favor his ideas nor appreciate being mentioned in regard to his scheme.

My only advice to you, Ricardo, is to RUN! Run to Portugal, before you find yourself in the chains that your ancestors used so liberally.
Too late?
written by Simpleton, April 18, 2010
Perhaps rather than caste class Rica-ar-do and miss all the potent under pinnings of discutable fine points maybe the basic premise of his article should be redrafted into something that can be put before the PBs as a national referendum in October? It would at least serve to prod those up for election / reelection this time around into realizing there are alternatives to the self-serving agenda / continuance of underacheivement they don't want the people to recognize / associate directly with their names.
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 18, 2010

So it was a "temporary retreat", eh? smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
Simpleton
written by Lloyd Cata, April 18, 2010
Perhaps rather than caste class Rica-ar-do

Sir, it is not I who "caste class" poor Mr. Amaral. It is he himself, many times, across many subjects, who has advocated and purported to frame the validity of his opinions on the basis of 'his class', which he does repeatedly put above the average Brazilian. So again, I remind the esteemed audience that 'even the poor and the illiterate understand injustice'. That he considers democratic government to be more unjust than dictatorship is his 'opinion'. That he advocates disenfranchising the people is the responsibility of 'all' Brazilians. That he indicates or attempts to show that his opinion is shared by others in the military and/or members of his 'class', with an attempt to 'persuade' the investment community of the validity of his argument(as outlined in his voluminous publications) is without doubt.

Now those are not 'my' premises. They are the actions and statements of what 'could' be termed a megalomaniac. Or you may interpret it as the sad repercussions of inbreeding, but I don't remember disparaging the entire class of which Mr. Amaral so proudly claims as 'his constituency'.
But thank you for allowing me to clear that up.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/smiley.gif
US Second Amendment = No Coup/Dictatorship
written by George Washington, April 18, 2010
If I were a conspiracy theorist, which I'm not, and saw sinister rumblings in Amaral's windbag of an article, I might point out that Brazil's banning of guns in the hands of the citizenry would be a brilliant first step to a coup. Right now, if the army were to take the streets, the only people able to defend the populace would be the drug gangs (and the cops on their payroll). Actually, the gangs and cops might win, and end up running the country. Might be an improvement. The favela dwellers probably live in less fear of crime that the middle class Brazilian.
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, April 18, 2010
So it was a "temporary retreat"

You may be an excellent 'flight instructor', but I have played chess with many unnamed masters smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 18, 2010

I have played chess also. In my spare time,have read Sun Tzu & Clausewitz.Is it check mate yet?smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010

Lloyd Cata I am very disappointed about your rant and complete non-sense that you posted above.

I expected something more intelligent from you.

The people who knows me and most of the people who have been posting on a regular basis on the Elite Trader Forum would laugh themselves silly after reading your posting.

Your posting shows that you don’t have a clue about me, regarding my personality, and the way I live my life. After reading many my postings you still have not grasped even the basics about what I write and how important honesty, morality, high ethics and integrity have played important role my entire life.

I am made of the same fiber of the “Andrada Family” and how you dare to even to insinuate on you posting that I would sell my country for a few Dollars. I would not sell out my country for nothing, there’s no money in the world enough to buy my honor, and high integrity and ethics, and love for my country Brazil.

I have been writing on a regular basis against corruption here in the United States and in Brazil, and you can’t grasp even this simple fact.

How can we expect you to grasp most of the other subjects that we have been discussing on this forum?

You just proved to me that you have no reason to get offended when my replies to you are directed to someone who has a simple mind and need help to understand things.

I thought that you were a good addition to our discussions on this forum, and now you have become a big disappointment.

I rest my case!

.
General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010

Reply to Simpleton

You said: Too late?


*****


Ricardo: No it is not.

As a matter of fact you just hit the nail right on the head, here is why?

Since I got the attention of the Brazilian and international mainstream media and they are discussing my article right now, then here it is only fair solution to test this idea and to resolve this controversy.

The mainstream media in Brazil should give a chance to the Brazilian population to choose, and ask General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira to throw his hat and participate as a candidate in the coming presidential election in Brazil in 2010.

Let the Brazilian people decide with their vote between Dilma, Serra, and General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira.

We already had a long discussion on Brazzil magazine last year regarding the possibility of General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira running for president in Brazil in 2010.

Here are a few postings that I made on Brazzil magazine and also on the Elite Trader Economics Forum in August of 2009 regarding the Brazilian presidential election of 2010 as follows:

The 2010 presidential election in Brazil will have major economic impact in the Brazilian economy – depending on who gets elected.

The comments section of this article also includes information about who should be the next president of Brazil.

There’s plenty of interesting information about General Augusto Heleno on the internet. And he might be the right General to be in charge of the major clean up job of the drug trafficking and widespread crime gangs that are terrorizing people all over Brazil. It seems that he has the right credentials to do that very important job. And also keep the Farc away from Brazilian territory.

Priority number one for Brazil in the coming years it should be to get rid of all drug traffickers, and the criminal gangs that terrorize and intimidate the average Brazilian all over our country. General Augusto Heleno would have to do something drastic to get rid of all that cancer.

We need to get our country back from these criminals before we can move forward to the next level.

Many members of Brazzil magazine agree that Lieutenant-General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira should be running for president of Brazil in 2010. And various members of Brazzil magazine also pledged their vote and support to General Augusto Heleno.

In the comments section we also discussed about Colombia and how the leaders of that country decided to give up on Colombia’s sovereignty status as an independent country, and become just a country occupied militarily by foreign forces.

You can read about it at:

Brazil VS. Venezuela – The Inevitability of Latin American Polarization.
http://www.brazzil.com/compone...l#comments


*****


Biography: General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira
http://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/A...ro_Pereira


*****


“We endorse the Augusto Heleno Petition to Gen.Augusto Heleno”

http://www.petitiononline.com/...xptoxpto&1


*****


You Tube – Interview - General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira

Interview 10 min - Apr 18, 2008
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XR-Zk0icSOQ


Interview 10 min - Feb 20, 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H5anXgss95Y


*****


Você votaria no General Augusto Heleno para Presidente da República?
Como todos devem ter acompanhado nos noticiários recentes, o General Augusto Heleno está sendo muito elogiado pela atitude de coragem que teve em relação ao Governo. Algumas comunidades do orkut estão cogitando a hipótese de sua candidatura à Presidência da República. Você apóia esta idéia?

http://answers.yahoo.co.nz/que...457AAtShob


*****


“General Heleno Presidente do Brasil”

NÃO TEMOS TEMPO A PERDER !

VOCÊ APOIA O MOVIMENTO GENERAL HELENO PRESIDENTE DO BRASIL?

NELE O BRASIL CONFIA !

É DESTEMIDO E LEGÍTIMO ENTRE SEUS PARES, NAS TRÊS FORÇAS ARMADAS.

http://generalhelenopresidente...eleno.html


******


Conclusion:

I challenge the Brazilian mainstream media to give coverage, and ask General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira to throw his hat and become a candidate in the coming presidential election in Brazil in 2010 - Under the “Order and Progress Party.”

Let the Brazilian people decide and vote if they want in Brazil:

1) “Order and Progress” or 2) “Anarchy and Chaos”

Ricardo C. Amaral

.
Keep in mind: regarding the Andrada Family
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010

When I said I am made of the same fiber of the “Andrada Family” this is what I mean:

I want to remind everybody that the “Andrada Family” stands for honor, high character, honesty, high ethics and integrity.

.
Ricardo Amaral
written by Lloyd Cata, April 18, 2010
I challenge the Brazilian mainstream media to give coverage, and ask General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira to throw his hat and become a candidate in the coming presidential election in Brazil in 2010 - Under the “Order and Progress Party.”
Let the Brazilian people decide and vote if they want in Brazil:
1) “Order and Progress” or 2) “Anarchy and Chaos”


I accept your apology Ricardo, smilies/wink.gif since I see you have relinquished your thirst for takeover of Brazil by dictatorship. That is not to say that I trust you simply because of your of the Andrada lineage. As I have said in response to João da Silva's earlier question, with regard to General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira candidacy for election; that I do think he is an honorable man and I would agree that he would be a good leader for Brazil. Perhaps you missed that, so it is that possibly you should review what I have posted. smilies/smiley.gif

As far as your conversations and publications with the international press and others, it has no standing with the election, nor with me. I have heard and seen better BS from much higher intellects. However, I am not naive enough to believe you are not still trying to affect the financial markets with your statements, and you are not naive enough to think bringing General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira into the 'election' mix will not have effect on those markets.

So let's say your choice of words as far as dictatorship were in poor taste, and I hope your friends in the financial community will forgive you for such an outlandish statement, but...but...do not suppose that this will be forgotten, which I can only assume was the purpose of your statement in the first place.smilies/shocked.gif
It is certainly my intent, and I hope the commitment of the Brazilian people to watch you, and your presumed associates, very carefully. Perhaps one day you will find the comfort of your own country more pleasant than your present accommodations in the US. We have also had honorable generals lead our nation, and they have proved to be of the highest caliber and the most truthful leaders we have ever had.

In defense of Brazilian democracy, I also rest my case. smilies/cool.gif
General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira = he can count with my vote...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 18, 2010

Lloyd Cata: I accept your apology Ricardo.


******


Ricardo: I have nothing to apologize to you.

As usual you did not understand my posting addressed to you.

If you think that my posting to you was an apology, then you have a real reading comprehension problem.

The other posting that you quoted was a reply to Simpleton and his posting asking if it was too late?


*******


And I hope some of our military people in Brazil are reading the above article and the following comments, and that they bring all this information to the attention of General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira.

If he decides to become a presidential candidate in the 2010 presidential election in Brazil – He can count with my vote.

.
General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira – Plan of Action…
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 19, 2010

On February 10, 2010 Eike Batista were interviewed on The Charlie Rose Show in New York City.

It was an excellent interview – I thought that I belonged to a dying breed – someone who believes in Brazilian independence and nationalism – and now I am happy to find out that Eike Batista also believes in Brazilian nationalism.

Eike Batista and I have the same type of mindset, and also share a similar vision for the future for Brazil. I was impressed with Mr. Eike Batista’s interview and I am glad that Brazil has a new wave of entrepreneurs of such a high-caliber as Eike Batista

If you go to this website you can see the web links to many of my published articles about Brazil, including my plan for the development of the Brazilian economy.

Brazzil Magazine – October 2007
"The Smartest Thing China Could Do Right Now: Invest US$ 200 Billion in Brazil" - Written by Ricardo C. Amaral

…The final conclusion is: It's imperative that China move forward in an aggressive fashion and implement with Brazil the plan described in this four-part series of articles. And China should look at it as a matter of national security and future survival.

Here is the master economic development plan for Brazil.

Monday, 01 October 2007 - Part 1 of 4
http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../9977.html

Friday, 05 October 2007 - Part 2 of 4
http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../9979.html

Thursday, 11 October 2007 - Part 3 of 4
http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../9983.html

Tuesday, 16 October 2007 - Part 4 of 4
http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../9985.html


*********


If General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira decides to run for president in Brazil in 2010, I would like to suggest that Mr. Eike Batista be among his closest advisors, since he is an exceptional entrepreneur, and business leader, and together we can design and put forward an economic development plan similar to mine, and make a pledge to the Brazilian people that in the next 10 years this economic development plan would lift the boats of about another 100 million people in Brazil.

A pledge to create enough new jobs in Brazil by the year 2021, to achieve the goal of lifting the boats of another 100 million people to the status of middle-class.

1) And at the same time improving the entire educational system in Brazil, and up dating it to be relevant in the 21st Century.

2) Wire Brazil with the latest in high-speed broadband technology to match the best systems in the world.

3) Improve the healthcare system, and make it available for the entire population.

4) Up grade our military system to match the best military systems in the world, and make it relevant for the 21st century.

I am sure that together, and with the help of the best minds in Brazil, we can achieve all these goals.

Ricardo C. Amaral

.
Living in fear
written by Simpleton, April 19, 2010
I can not speak to what the situation is in the favelas / favela like areas of SP but through misfortunate circumstances I have had opportunity to visit and stay in various ones in RJ. Two more this past season to add to the list of those over the past few years. This sense of living in fear is not what I would characterize as being in the minds, hearts and day to day lives of the moradores. That the young man with his automatic weapon was so eager and gleeful to point it out to me / show it off during a day time entry into the upper reaches of one I found amusing but nobody was scared of him in the least. Matter of fact, the young gent while doing his patrol checking what passed both on the normal route and the somewhat hidden / more rugged one not often traveled was a bit naive. I bent over to tie my shoe as he passed behind me with a deep ravine directly behind him. Rather that just reaching back to grasp the breach of his weapon to use like a cane to stabilize the both of us I could have just as easily ripped it from his grip and butted him right off into space. I do not know how the locals would have reacted but that wouldn't have been much worry as the prized possesion would then have been in my hands an pointed in their direction "for security". Anyway, I do sense the utter fear arising / welling up in at least three of the areas I have experienced in ways it's not normal / sensible for gringo's to risk doing - it's the rare occasion when the police pass through putting all at risk. Rampant violence and insecurity - that I have not seen but then I'm not going to go to every corner of every favela at every hour and day of the week. I may be Maluco but I'm not stupid.
...
written by Ronald, April 19, 2010
Come on JP you were sat in a park with your laptop using your mobile broadband!? I keep wondering how many brazilians can do that..
Honestly we don't have politicians brave enough to handle this specific problem, even if we had, our law system is so bureaucratic that would take forever to change the system to punish people.
I believe you are aware about a law project that is running in Brazil to avoid corrupt politicians to be elected. They are trying their best to hold it for another election, so do you really think people like these will be willing to change things in our loved country?
Our police force has the stupidest arrangement that I've seen in my life, this division of forces, of tasks, they don't cooperate to each other it's all a big mess. And who on earth, or should I say in Brazil will change that!? I don't think we have anyone there to do it. After all I'm pretty sure, as we brazilians used to say, all of them have "o rabo preso".
The organised crime change things as they happens, pretty much as the economic market whilst our laws are the same that it used to be decades ago, and any try of changing it would take another decade. How long do you think people handle that? Well you are saying that the Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro situation is "normal" because life carried on, but if you take a deep look there are a lot of people specially the mid class, that have made some profit and increased their income, sending their kids away, to your lovely London, where you can sit in a park in a sunny spring afternoon and complain about abuse of force and economy stagnation. If you can see a way of all Brazilians to have the same right of you to sit in a non-fenced park with your laptop using broadband without anybody threat their lives because of it I'm all ears for you.
As posted by you in my blog I totally agree with the "education way", but I can't see the education changing that as most of people that join those factions do it by their own will, because it's a good money, "work is for losers" as many of them say. Nobody want their kids to grow in a place like that, and it's probably why you were sat in a park in London when writing it and not in Sao Paulo.
My main concern never was about economic grown honestly I can live without it. I still support the idea of a "Benevolent Dictatorship" to have a better life quality and to clean up all those plagues from our congress. And as I've also said in my blog after that maybe people will raise and really start to stand for their rights not stay sit at their homes watching TV and moaning about everything that happens in Brasilia as that wasn't their problems.
No military in Brazilian politics
written by Legion, April 19, 2010
I'd just like to point out that Mr Amaral's call for a military candidate in the 2010 elections is a tad late - institutionally speaking, of course. Affiliation of military personnel with political parties is in fact prohibited by the current Constitution (CF, art. 142, §3°, V), which in turn makes them unable to run for any political positions. So you can all go home and recycle your brand-new Gen. Heleno 2010 banners.:-(

That's how deep the analytical skills of Mr Amaral go.

Interestingly, Mr Amaral's brilliant analyses and proposals have been taken (indirect) note of by most relevant Brazilian institutions, and appear lost in the middle of the clippings they give to public servants so they won't be too bored in the morning.

http://www.mre.gov.br/portugues/noticiario/nacional/selecao_detalhe3.asp?ID_RESENHA=691132

http://clipping.tse.gov.br/noticias/2010/Abr/18/os-dados-estao-lancados

http://clippingmp.planejamento.gov.br/cadastros/noticias/2010/4/17/por-que-a-china-pode-e-nos-nao

So that's how seriously (beyond perhaps the bizarre world of hyperactive teenagers and retiring loonies) Mr Amaral's proposals will be taken.

But maybe some more brilliant analyses like these will give you a column in Revista Veja next year. You know, people are getting tired of the same old neocons, they're not even funny anymore. Millor also has to die one day or another, right?

Cheers
Lloyd Cata is Ricardo's father.
written by Ederson, April 19, 2010
Okay, I've spent all weekend trying to figure this out, and last evening, the answer came to me in a dream.
Lloyd Cata is not really a doctor or Ph.d., the fact of which has caused him no end of grief, for he enjoys portraying one with his enviable knowledge of economics and eloquent use of the English language. His only son, Ricardo, has been pressured to study economics by his underachieving father, which he dutifully does, astonishing his father by eventually obtaining a doctorate from a lesser-known university not too many miles from the family home in Brooklyn, where they both reside.
Lloyd Cata has instilled within his son many ideals, of which they both share.
For instance, they both love the bomb and atomic power.
Both love Islam, the father loves the Iranians, and the son prefers the Saudis. {Notice the hate between them already! The old Sunni/Shiite penis envy and struggle.}
They both hate Jews.
They both love dictators.
They both hate populations of citizenry with guns. {If God meant for people to have guns, he wouldn't have created dictators.}
While both champion the cause of the poor Brazilian serf, neither elects to live in Brazil, amongst them.
I currently believe the best thing for Ricardo to do is to leave home and move to Portugal, before his father throws him out. I sense a certain amount of rage within Lloyd for Ricardo's love and devotion for his homeland, but his nationalism is making it difficult for Lloyd to move the family back to Brazil, hence Mr. Cata's recent reluctance and announcement on this blog that he wouldn't be doing so.

Father Cata and son Ricardo, you two need to embrace each other and return your family to the strength it possessed before this horrible split fell upon this wonderful blog. Indeed, as soon as you two can reconcile, I'm sure the FT will print the whole story and explain this mess as nothing but your typical father and son squabble.
There’s nothing set in stone regarding the current Brazilian Constitution
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 19, 2010

Legion: No military in Brazilian politics

I'd just like to point out that Mr Amaral's call for a military candidate in the 2010 elections is a tad late - institutionally speaking, of course. Affiliation of military personnel with political parties is in fact prohibited by the current Constitution (CF, art. 142, §3°, V), which in turn makes them unable to run for any political positions. So you can all go home and recycle your brand-new Gen. Heleno 2010 banners.:-(


*****


Ricardo: When I said on the comments section of my article: “The mainstream media in Brazil should give a chance to the Brazilian population to choose, and ask General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira to throw his hat and participate as a candidate in the coming presidential election in Brazil in 2010.

Let the Brazilian people decide with their vote between Dilma, Serra, and General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira.”

That was a compromise related to the subject of my article in a major effort to keep the peace in Brazil.

If General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira is allowed to run for president in Brazil in 2010, I would not be surprised if he wins that election. There is a very large portion of the Brazilian population that is sick and tired of rampant and widespread wave of corruption and crime in Brazil.

A vote for General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira would represent a vote for bringing back social order, stability, and harmony – inside Brazil, including the entire Brazilian territory.

In Brazil we can change anything we want to accommodate the current circumstances, including changing the law to allow the president to be re-elected as we did in Brazil a few years ago – and there’s nothing set in stone regarding the current Brazilian Constitution.

My article was about having a change in government in Brazil similar to the one we had in 1964 with the military seizing power through a coup d'état.

I am sure things can be changed very fast in Brazil to allow General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira to be one of the candidates for president in 2010.

If allowed to run for president General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira then he can count with my vote and the vote of many people that I know.

.
..............................................
written by fried CHC, April 19, 2010



Are you ladies ovulating?

Oh My Gosh: You all either have a lot of time in your hands, or, simply enjoy gossiping about nothing.... Get A Life B.i.t.c.h.e.s. on the Rag!

Costinha
Haja xuxismo
written by Valeska, April 19, 2010
The Brazilian FOrmula for Success: Xuxa smilies/grin.gif
Lula's prayer
written by observador, April 20, 2010
ORAÇÃO DO LULA

SENHOR,
Fazei de mim o instrumento do golpe na Constituição...
para garantir mais uma reeleição.

Onde houver mutreta... que eu mostre a maleta;
Onde houver gorjeta... que seja minha teta;
Que eu tenha dor na munheca... de tanto encher a cueca;
Em cada licitação... que alguém molhe a minha mão;
E que no meu endereço, vença o meu preço;

Onde houver crachá... que não falte o jabá;
Onde houver ócio... que eu feche o negócio;
Onde houver propina... que reservem o da vila campesinaa;
Mas sem esquecer do MST, das ONGs e do PT;

Onde houver colarinho branco...

que dobre o lucro do banco;
Onde houver esquema... cuidado com o telefonema;
E quando tocar o sino... chamem o Genoíno;
Se mexerem no meu... que venha o Zé Dirceu;
E, se a proposta for chula... lembrai do custo do Lula.

Ó Mestre!

Que eu tenha poder para corromper e ser corrompido;
Porque é sonegando que se é promovido;
É mentindo que se vai subindo;
Pois enquanto o povo sofre com imposto e inflação,
o índio passa o facão, o sem terra faz a invasão,
a base aliada entra na negociação
e a gente vai metendo a mão...

E que a pizza seja feita pela vossa vontade
enquanto a grana da publicidade
levar o povo a aceitar nossa desonestidade
como se fosse genialidade...

AMÉM !
Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, April 20, 2010
Lloyd Cata is Ricardo's father.

Sir, I am wounded that you should slander me in such a way. Were I the creator of such backwardness I should have to challenge you to pistols at high noon.smilies/cheesy.gif

Lloyd Cata is not really a doctor or Ph.d.

Certainly never having claimed the credentials of grand institutions, it is with a certain amount of satisfaction that I attempt to cure you of specific ignorance of which I am familiar. Indeed, many come to your country, from around the world, to study the medicine of the Indigenous peoples who have only the lessons of history and the knowledge of truth. Perhaps if more Brazilians would study their ways, in harmony
with the Earth, the cures for many other ills facing Brazil would find remedy.smilies/wink.gif

For instance, they both love the bomb and atomic power.

If you peruse the archives of this site you will find the statements of a Brazilian admiral who espoused such ideas for Brazil(do your own research!). That I agreed with him, at that time, has only been borne out by subsequent world events. Nuclear technology 'handled responsibly' being in the interests all states with respect to energy and security. Note: President Lula did not offer to give Brazil's 'highly enriched uranium' to the US at the recent nuclear summit.smilies/shocked.gif

Both love Islam

Being a confirmed Christian, it is my duty to love my Islamic bothers, no matter how misguided I may find their beliefs or practices. My hope is that they will reciprocate and acknowledge the value of 'all' faith in God.

They both hate Jews.

I find hate destructive to both the body and the soul. You may be referring to my disdain for 'Zionist practices' which I certainly do not associate with all people of Jewish faith. How could I have enmity to the family of my Lord and Saviour, Jesus Christ? Nor even to the family of Ricardo...every family has its afflictions.

They both love dictators.

That I believe such practice is 'necessary' in specific circumstances is without question or apology. Tolerance is certainly not to be confused with love. Life presents us with many things that we tolerate for the present and hope to change in the future. Our love for the sinner has no impact on our sentiments of the sins...

They both hate populations of citizenry with guns.

Since I have already dispensed with the subject of hate, let me say that on the subject of guns; I do not support "unrestricted access" to guns without the supervision of state regulation, which is the same way I feel about cars, airplanes, and other commodities that have proven to be detrimental to society "when used irresponsibly". We cannot make blanket statements on this question, just as we cannot say "drugs are bad", when we know that when used "responsibly" they are necessary to a life free from pain and despair. Let me say, "One reason that I sometimes associate 'gun' and 'nut' is because no matter how many times I attempt to explain this, some peoples heads are too dense to understand".smilies/cheesy.gif

While both champion the cause of the poor Brazilian serf, neither elects to live in Brazil, amongst them.

I cannot speak for Ricardo, but I have not precluded doing just that, should I be so honored as to be welcomed by that community. You see I have no aristocratic pretensions, nor am I unfamiliar with their
situation in my own life and travels.smilies/wink.gif
...
written by Ederson, April 20, 2010
Mr, Cata. You are forever the good sport and seem able to recognize honest humor, however dry. Instead of a duel with pistols, how about a pie eating contest? If I win, Ricardo is yours; if you win, Joao must apologize for my ridiculous assertion.smilies/cheesy.gif
And who is sick and tired?
written by Legion, April 20, 2010
Ricardo: "There is a very large portion of the Brazilian population that is sick and tired of rampant and widespread wave of corruption and crime in Brazil."

Legion: And who are these people? Given that Lula has had around 75% approval over the last year at least, I wonder who is this "large portion of the Brazilian population".

Judging by people I know, this large portion is neither in the favelas, nor in lower middle-class neighbourhoods, nor on top floors of Avenida Paulista buildings. The latter, unhappily for the well-fed but powerless revolutionaries, vote with their pockets.

I would say 95% of this "large portion" are people like you: upper middle-class self-employed but dependant workers (lawyers, accountants, consultants, advertisers and the like) who would, despite all evidence, still say the Lula government has been terrible and the country is doing worse every day. These people are instinctively anti-democracy; they are not numerically representative, and that is why you call for military help. Your sanitizing project - that's what it is, isn't it? Does the word ring a bell? - can only be applied through mass violence, torture, intimidation and fear.

Thankfully, Brazil is over that. Thankfully, no one with a minimum of knowledge of our society would even think that appropriate, or feasible, now that things are, by any standards save for this upper middle-class never-ending fear, getting better all the time. Any poll will tell you that your concerns are miles away from those of the majority of the Brazilian population - but of course you know better than them what is in their interest, right?

My guts make me want to throw you in one of the jails you imagine for our people, to be treated like you want the police to treat them; but my brain tells me that's what makes me, and us, different from the likes of you.

Cheers/
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 20, 2010

If I win, Ricardo is yours; if you win, Joao must apologize for my ridiculous assertion.


Why drag me into the picture?smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

A nice poem posted by "Observador". Hope Dr.Cata is able to understand at least the first 6 lines.smilies/wink.gif
A verdade sobre os criminosos ai no Brasil…Part 1 of 2
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 20, 2010

Part 1 of 2


Hoje uma pessoa que mora no Brasil me mandou via email um slide show com comentarios com o titulo “Liberdade ao Brasil” – e nessa apresentacao mostra tudo que militares fizeram nos ultimos 100 anos; desda Primeira Guerra mundial, e um monte de revolucoes e guerras. Um verdadeira historia das carnificinas que aconteceram no mundo nos ultimos 100 anos.

Isto em reacao ao meu artigo sobre ditadura ai no Brasil. Por alguma razao o slide show nao incluiu nenhuma carnificina e nao listou os milhoes de mortos durante os periodos de ditadura ai no Brasil: incluindo o periodo Getulio Vargas, e o periodo dos militares.

Sera que e porque nao ouve carnificina de milhoes de pessoas ai no Brasil durante os periodos de ditadura?


****


Aqui esta a resposta que mandei a esta pessoa em referencia a informacao daquele email.



Aonde voce achou esta reliquia duma epoca que ja passou a muito tempo?

O material que voce me mandou voce esta sugerindo que ouveram massacres de milhoes de pessoas ai no Brasil durante o period das ditaduras. O que nao e verdade.

Primeiro, dois dos paises que fizeram um trabalho extraordinario nos ultimos 20 anos em levantar o pais da pobreza - a China, e Singapura - estes dois paises sao ditaduras.

Por que a India nao esta tendo o mesmo resultado positivos que a China economicamente?

A China com o system deles conseguiu levanter por volta de 400 milhoes de pessoas da pobreza nos ultimos 20 anos, e a India levantou uma minoria como o Brazil.

A unica explicacao para esta imensa diferenca em resultados e que a China e uma ditadura, e a India e o Brasil sao democracias.

A Singapura era um pais pauperrimo, e desde que se tornou uma ditadura benevolente o pais se tornou um modelo para o mundo de como se transforma um pais para elevar a um dos maiores living standards no mundo.

O Mexico e outra democracia que esta sendo destruida constantemente pelos criminosos, pelas gangs, e druglords.

Se o modelo que o Brasil quer seguir e o modelo do Mexico dai faz sentido continuar com o system atual de democracia que vai te garantir os mesmos resultados do Mexico – anarchy e chaos.

Voce se lembra do que aconteceu em Maio de 2006 ai em Sao Paulo quando as criminal gangs terrorizaram a cidade de Sao Paulo. Aquilo foi so um gostinho do que vem por ai.

Eu sei que voces estao se adapitando a viver com o crime em torno de voces. E uma pena que voces estejam adapitando a esta situacao terrivel em vez de fazer alguma coisa para corrigir o problema.

A uns anos atraz uma prima nossa foi terrorizada ai em Sao Paulo por algum tempo. Eles recebiam telefonemas em casa que se eles nao pagassem uma certa quantia um dos membros da familia ia ser sequestrada. Este terror durou 3 meses em que eles tinham medo de sair de casa por medo de ser sequestrado. Eles contrataram um seguranca armado para proteje-los. Depois de 3 meses eles decidiram pagar o dinheiro que estavam pedindo. Logo em seguida a familia viajou por um mes para dar um tempo para a situacao acalmar.

Depois de um mes voltaram a Sao Paulo e continuaram com o seguranca por mais dois meses em caso esta gente entrasse em contato com eles de novo. So ai a vida voltou ao normal, mas durante meio ano a familia vivia em constante terror e com medo desses criminosos que estavam ameacando a vida deles.

Mas no domingo passado minha mae foi visitar uma amiga Brasileira aqui em New Jersey. Quando ela estava na casa dessa amiga ela ficou conhecendo outra Brazileira que tinha mudado para os Estados Unidos recentemente.

Minha mae conversou muito com esta moca que conheceu (37, 38 anos de idade), e nos ficamos com muita pena dela pelo o que ela passou ai no Rio de Janeiro.

Esta moca esta um basket case e extremamente depremida - hoje ela tem pavor de sair de casa, mesmo aqui nos Estados Unidos por medo de ser sequestrada.

Ela tinha sido sequestrada ai no Rio de Janeiro, e ficou sequestrada durante uma semana ate a familia dela pagar o resgate aos sequestradores.

Depois que ela foi solta pelos sequestradores ela mudou completamente e ficou completamente neurotica por causa da experiencia. A experiencia afetou a vida dela profundamente, ela se divorciou do marido e veio morar aqui nos Estados Unidos, mas mesmo morando aqui nos USA ela continua apavorada que alguem va sequestrala de novo e ela quase nunca sai da casa para nada. Mesmo morando aqui nos Estados Unidos ela continua sendo uma prisioneira mental daqueles sequestradores ai do Rio de Janeiro.

.
A verdade sobre os criminosos ai no Brasil…Part 1 of 2
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 20, 2010

>














>
A verdade sobre os criminosos ai no Brasil…Part 2 of 2
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 20, 2010

Part 2 of 2


Outo conhecido nosso que tem um restaurante na praia no Estado de Sao Paulo – a mais de um ano que ele teve que contratar um seguranca armado para protejer o restaurante o tempo todo das gangs de criminosos. Um salario a mais que tem que pago e ao mesmo tempo a clientela e o movimento diminuiu muito pois o pessoal da cidade tem medo de sair de casa de noite por casa das criminal gangs. Ate uns dez anos atraz eles nunca tiveram esse tipo de problema naquela cidade. Hoje em dia eles estao apavorados dos criminosos e dao gracas a Deus quando todos os membros da familia conseguem chegar em casa sem ter problema com estes criminosos.


****


Varios membros de minha familia que moram em Sao Paulo foram roubados varias vezes durante os ultimos anos. Tem tanto material que da para escrever um livro comprido sobre este assunto – um livro so do que aconteceu aos membros de minha familia; including carjackings, muggings, house robbery, and house invasion when they terrorized the entire family during the robbery.

.
Continuacao do posting
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 20, 2010


Depois que ela foi solta pelos sequestradores ela mudou completamente e ficou completamente neurotica por causa da experiencia. A experiencia afetou a vida dela profundamente, ela se divorciou do marido e veio morar aqui nos Estados Unidos, mas mesmo morando aqui nos USA ela continua apavorada que alguem va sequestrala de novo e ela quase nunca sai da casa para nada. Mesmo morando aqui nos Estados Unidos ela continua sendo uma prisioneira mental daqueles sequestradores ai do Rio de Janeiro.


*****


Part 2 of 2


Outo conhecido nosso que tem um restaurante na praia no Estado de Sao Paulo – a mais de um ano que ele teve que contratar um seguranca armado para protejer o restaurante o tempo todo das gangs de criminosos. Um salario a mais que tem que pago e ao mesmo tempo a clientela e o movimento diminuiu muito pois o pessoal da cidade tem medo de sair de casa de noite por casa das criminal gangs. Ate uns dez anos atraz eles nunca tiveram esse tipo de problema naquela cidade. Hoje em dia eles estao apavorados dos criminosos e dao gracas a Deus quando todos os membros da familia conseguem chegar em casa sem ter problema com estes criminosos.


****


Varios membros de minha familia que moram em Sao Paulo foram roubados varias vezes durante os ultimos anos. Tem tanto material que da para escrever um livro comprido sobre este assunto – um livro so do que aconteceu aos membros de minha familia; including carjackings, muggings, house robbery, and house invasion when they terrorized the entire family during the robbery.

.
Web Sites dos Governo Brasileiro Part 1 of 3
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 20, 2010

Ricardo: Aqui esta as informacoes que foram publicadas nas websites do governo Brasileiro.


1) Ministério das Relações Exteriores
http://www.mre.gov.br/portugue...NHA=691132

ROUBINI ERROU

O site de Nouriel Roubini, RGE, postou anteontem o artigo "A fórmula brasileira para o sucesso - ditadura", em que o economista Ricardo Amaral escreve: "Estou sugerindo que os militares deveriam tomar o poder, através de um golpe de Estado". Argumenta foi a ditadura que "plantou a semente para a prosperidade". O blog ft-dot-comment, do "Financial Times", denunciou ontem a "decisão errada de Roubini" e, à noite, o link já estava fora do ar. Mas o texto pode ser acessado em cache.


*****


2) Tribunal Superior Eleitoral
http://clipping.tse.gov.br/not...o-lancados

Vexame internacional Site de Nouriel Roubini publicou texto que defende golpe militar como "fórmula brasileira para o sucesso" O economista Nouriel Roubini, que foi colunista de Carta Capital, criou uma reputação técnica merecida ao nadar contra a corrente e prever o fim da bolha imobiliária dos EUA e a crise de 2008. Mas não mostra a mesma competência na escolha e supervisão de colaboradores.

Em 14 de abril,seu site, o RGE Monitor, publicou na seção Latin America Ecomonitor um insólito artigo de Ricardo C. Amaral, economista e empresário brasileiro residente nos EUA. Intitulado "Ditadura: a fórmula brasileira para o sucesso", faz um longo panegírico de três ditaduras brasileiras - a de José Bonifácio (1821-1823), a de Getúlio Vargas (1937-1945) e a ditadura de 1964 -1985 - e termina por convidar o general Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira, comandante da força da ONU no Haiti, a desferir um golpe de Estado porque "todos sabemos que este problema massivo de crime, que está devastando a população brasileira, não pode ser resolvido sob um sistema democrático e por causa das ações que precisam ser tomadas para pacificar todas as comunidades no Brasil. É tempo de uma ditadura benevolente tomar o poder no Brasil e fazer o serviço".

O editor do financial Times, James Mackintosh, horrorizou-se Com razão. E lança a suspeita de que Amaral, que se diz descendente de José Bonifácio (sobre o qual escreveu um livro intitulado The Greatest Man in Brazilian History) e "integrante das duas famílias politicamente mais influentes da história brasileira, as dinastias Andrada e Souza Queiroz", aspira a um cargo em sua sonhada ditadura.

Aponta que, embora o Ecomonitor funcione até certo ponto como uma página de artigos de opinião, se já não é fácil convencer leitores de jornais de que estes não estão relacionados à postura política do editor, isso é ainda mais complicado quando se trata de uma consultoria econômica. Roubini será ainda bem-vindo em Brasília?

Sem explicações, o artigo foi retirado do RGE na noite do dia15. Mas podia ainda ser lido no site Brazzil, com, do qual Amaral é colaborador regular
Competência em economia não desculpa irresponsabilidade política. Roubini deveria reconhecer o custo humano das ditaduras que assolaram o Brasil e o Cone Sul e repudiar explicitamente essa apologia da ruptura da ordem democrática.

.
Web Sites dos Governo Brasileiro Part 2 of 3
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 20, 2010

Ricardo: A resposta e simples a questao que o artigo de Clovis Rossi levantou quando ele deu sua opiniao em resposta ao meu artigo sobre ditadura. Aqui vai:

Primeiro, dois dos paises que fizeram um trabalho extraordinario nos ultimos 20 anos em levantar o pais da pobreza - a China, e Singapura - estes dois paises sao ditaduras.

Por que a India nao esta tendo o mesmo resultados economicos positivos que a China?

A China com o sistema deles conseguiu levanter por volta de 400 milhoes de pessoas da pobreza nos ultimos 20 anos, e a India levantou uma minoria como o Brazil.

A unica explicacao para esta imensa diferenca nos resultados economicos e sociais e que a China e uma ditadura, e a India e o Brasil sao democracias.

A Singapura era um pais pauperrimo, e desde que se tornou uma ditadura benevolente o pais se tornou um modelo para o mundo de como se transforma um pais para se elevar a um dos maiores living standards do mundo.

O Mexico e outra democracia que esta sendo destruida constantemente pelos criminosos, pelas gangs, e druglords.

Se o modelo que o Brasil quer seguir e o modelo do Mexico dai faz sentido continuar com o sistema atual de democracia que vai te garantir os mesmos resultados do Mexico – anarchy e chaos.

Voce se lembra do que aconteceu em Maio de 2006 ai em Sao Paulo (num pais democratico) quando as criminal gangs terrorizaram a cidade de Sao Paulo. Aquilo foi so um gostinho do que vem por ai.


*****


3) Ministério do Planejamento
http://clippingmp.planejamento...-e-nos-nao

Por que a China pode e nós não?
Autor(es): CLÓVIS ROSSI
Folha de S. Paulo - 17/04/2010

É CHOCANTE o contraste entre a notícia de que a China cresceu praticamente 12% no primeiro trimestre deste ano, em comparação com idêntico período de 2009, e a fúria com que reagem autoridades e economistas brasileiros contra a possibilidade de que o Brasil cresça 7%, o que seria apenas 60% do crescimento chinês.

Convém não esquecer que, "desde 1996, crescemos a uma taxa média correspondente a menos da metade da alcançada por aqueles países [Rússia, Índia e China, parceiros no Bric]: nosso crescimento anual médio per capita foi de 3%, contra 7% dos outros três", escreveu para esta Folha Luiz Carlos Bresser-Pereira, em julho passado (folha.com.br/101063, para assinantes).

Não parece ter caído sobre o Brasil uma maldição divina que o proíbe de se aproximar do crescimento chinês ou, pelo menos, do indiano. Logo, os estudiosos de Brasil devem ao público uma explicação para esse formidável deficit comparativo de crescimento.

Enquanto ela não surge, aparecem teorias estapafúrdias como a de Ricardo Amaral, no site do celebrado Nouriel Roubini, aquele que foi um dos pouquíssimos a enxergar antes a crise que se abateria sobre o planeta de 2007 em diante.

Nelson de Sá citou o artigo de Amaral, "A fórmula brasileira para o sucesso -ditadura", logo retirado do ar. Fui atrás do texto integral. É uma tremenda coleção de bobagens. Defende a tese de que uma "ditadura benevolente" (uma contradição em termos) planta "semente para a prosperidade".

Cita três períodos ditatoriais no Brasil, o mais recente dos quais foi o último que tivemos até agora (1964/85). "Plantou", segundo o artigo, a semente da Embraer e do etanol.

Como se só uma ditadura pudesse criar uma fabricante competitiva de aviões ou um programa de combustível alternativo. O Canadá é uma democracia e "plantou" a Bombardier, que compete com a Embraer, que, aliás, deslanchou mesmo após o fim da ditadura, assim como o programa do etanol.

O artigo poderia ter mencionado o fato de que, em parte do período autoritário, o crescimento econômico chegou a ser "chinês", o que os órfãos da ditadura vez ou outra citam envergonhadamente porque não é politicamente correto defender feitos de um período execrável.

Quando um endereço de celebridade, como o site de Roubini, aceita, sem pudor, a defesa desse tipo de "solução", abre-se, inexoravelmente, espaço para discutir se o modelo chinês pode ou não ser a resposta para os problemas de crescimento de países emergentes, em desenvolvimento e até subdesenvolvidos. É a rigor o único modelo alternativo, bem-sucedido até agora, às democracias liberais do mundo rico e não tão rico.

Combina, como todo mundo sabe, uma ditadura de partido único, fortemente repressiva, com uma certa liberdade para o mercado, ainda que a intervenção do Estado continue sendo importante.

Se alguém está interessado na minha opinião, que fique claro: abomino ditaduras, bem ou malsucedidas. Prefiro mil vezes o modelo brasileiro pós-1985 mas não acho que devamos ter medo a um crescimento econômico "chinês". Falta achar o caminho para ele.

.

Web Sites dos Governo Brasileiro Part 3 of 3
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 20, 2010

Ricardo: O senhor CLÓVIS ROSSI tambem disse o seguinte em seu artigo: “Como se só uma ditadura pudesse criar uma fabricante competitiva de aviões ou um programa de combustível alternativo.”

Por coincidencia eu estava com um artigo quase pronto que vai clarificar este assunto ao Sr. Rossi – e tambem aos leitores da revista Brazzil.

Eu acho incrivel como estes jornalistas atuais querem mudar e modificar o que aconteceu na nossa historia sobre o pretexto de sanatizar ou diminuir o credito que o governo militar merece pelas coisas boas que aconteceram na economia brasileira durante aquele period de nossa historia - referente ao passado e realidade da nossa historia ai no Brasil.


*****


3) Ministério do Planejamento
http://clippingmp.planejamento...-e-nos-nao

Por que a China pode e nós não?
Autor(es): CLÓVIS ROSSI
Folha de S. Paulo - 17/04/2010

.
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, April 20, 2010
I gather, hopefully enough, from the poem by "observador" that any attempt to counter the constitution would guarantee the election of Dilma.

Excuse me, but it appears the next lines were a little vulgar(according to my interpreter)smilies/shocked.gif

Apparently, there is no way the opposition; favelados, MST, ONG, or PT would allow such a thing to happen. That is essentially my point in putting forward the 'scheme' of such a proposal. Although Brazilians would not be in favor of such an outcome, the mention of such a proposal, by a "legitimate" economic analyst, 'could' be used to set up a table at the 'casino' in which 'bets' are taken on the 'feasibility' of the proposal. In the words of a great American showman, PT Barnum, "there's a sucker born every minute". We know how many suckers were taken by the 'wizards' on Wall Street, don't we? After all, did not Mr. Amaral sucker the great Mr. Roubini(RGE) into printing something that was totally without foundation? Now I regress that this may not be Mr. Amaral's intent, but being the expert in economics, there is no way he could not have foreseen the implications of his statement(?). So he vacillates between coup d'etat and having the honorable general join the election process. All the time trying to convince everyone of his extraordinary ethics and honesty, based on his esteemed family/personal history and connections. That I am not impressed by his arguments to the contrary would be borne out by any qualified economic analyst. These are very sensitive questions right now in the US with several 'elite' persons, some of whom Mr. Amaral may know personally given his wealth of contacts and connections, possibly facing criminal charges.
You may remember this economic period for many years to come as the EU begins to understand the extent to which they have been played for fools by their US cousins. Indeed the Empire is on shaky economic ground.

So indeed, as the poet alludes to; the "scheme" is cloaked in the supposed "genius" of the author.

I am not much of a poet, so I will just say Mr. Amaral should step away from his keyboard if he is going to be using his hand for producing such a watery product.smilies/wink.gif
observador
written by Lloyd Cata, April 20, 2010
Por favor perdoe-me, sir. Also to the Brazilian audience. I know João is disappointed by my ignorance in the lanuae, but even with novice skills I'm afraid I would be just an amusement to the esteemed audience. smilies/sad.gif

I know I probably butchered your wonderful poem and its meaning, but my handicap prevents me from better insight. In no way should my comments reflect on the skill you exhibited in writing the document.smilies/smiley.gif
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 20, 2010

I gather, hopefully enough, from the poem by "observador" that any attempt to counter the constitution would guarantee the election of Dilma.


No. It implies that "every" attempt will be made to counter the constitution to ensure 3rd ,4th...N th mandates.smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

Excuse me, but it appears the next lines were a little vulgar(according to my interpreter


Not really vulgar. Probably, your "interpreter" didn't want her Dad-in-law´s blood pressure to go up by coming to know of so many "scandals" during the past 7 years. smilies/cool.gif

I don't think that the "author" of the "poem" was really the "Observador", who I bet, is perfectly bilingual and will interpret the poem for you in perfect American English for ya. Especially after your politerequest.smilies/wink.gif

These are very sensitive questions right now in the US with several 'elite' persons, some of whom Mr. Amaral may know personally given his wealth of contacts and connections, possibly facing criminal charges.


Lets forget Ricardo´s ancestry which is not the issue under discussion. He is not yet sufficiently well informed about the economic situation in Brasil, nor or you.

Recommended re-reading for you both:

1) The comments of our new Brasilian fellow blogger operating from Hyde Park,London.

2) The "Poem" posted by "Dr.Observador".

3) The blog of "Ronald". (Just double-click on the red ID in his first entry)

4) Comments by "Ederson" (especially the first one).

Cheers
Tanks Joao Muito Tanks
written by Simpleton, April 20, 2010
Reading the comments under "Ronald"'s blog was enjoyable. Tanks for pointing it out and how to get there. Currently the last posting is just the translation of Ricardo's article into Portugues - although I generally dislike Paulistas I hope at least they may go and contribute something of value to the discussion (other than complaints).

People taking up the responsibility to take care to their neighbourhoods vs being dependant on public or military institutions is a problem everywhere. Stretching out to see to / guide / assist with education of those outside the family is another and the state just won't do more than it is forced to. Again - responsabilidades individuais.
Simpleton
written by João da Silva, April 20, 2010

although I generally dislike Paulistas I hope at least they may go and contribute something of value to the discussion (other than complaints).


Just remember that "Paulistanos" elected a technocrat as their mayor in 2008 through ballot. smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, April 21, 2010
( http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/201...t_dictator )

Justice seeks the truth, and when it finds it, the guilty eventually pay. I understand the injustice of the corruption in Brasilia. Does anyone think we are not having the same issue in Washington? It is simply one of the evils of Democratic government.
Lula cannot claim 'clean hands', considering his Franco-Brazilian military posture, or his 'damned' dam, but what the hey! He can always say he was better than Sarney ...NOT! Obama took $1,000,000 from just the Goldman people alone, and more from the other 'wizards' on Wall Street. What can you do? It's politics, and people will offer money to people in power, whether they wear Saville suits or military uniforms. If the men in suits are more likely to 'take' the money, certainly the men in uniform are more likely to 'use' their guns. The worst dictators, of course, take the money and use their guns.

They all come and go; the desire for justice remains. Some get justice, others get amnesty, and the rest lay in comfort in their Western villas. Time, of course, is not their friend. Memories are long and the truth is powerful. Those who aspire to wear the crown should remember that.

note: I must do my research now, as I try to think of any who retire to Eastern villas... smilies/smiley.gif
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 21, 2010


Lula cannot claim 'clean hands', considering his Franco-Brazilian military posture, or his 'damned' dam, but what the hey! He can always say he was better than Sarney ..


You got your facts all wrong. Mr.Lula never said he is better than Mr.Sarney. If you recall the earlier statements of Ricardo which are correct, Mr.Lula is surrounded by important and good advisers to make Brasil an economic powerhouse and one of them is our ex President Mr.Sarney. They are pretty good friends.Though Mr.Sarney criticizes the "ditadura" in his speeches ,Mr.Lula hardly talks about it.

Of course the criticisms of Mr.Lula and Madame Roussef are directed at Mr.FHC (another ex-President). So please stop mixing up things and do not distort facts.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif

Obama took $1,000,000 from just the Goldman people alone, and more from the other 'wizards' on Wall Street.


Did Goldman have to pay this amount to get his kid back from Brasil? Scandalous, to put it mildly. smilies/shocked.gif

Memories are long and the truth is powerful.


For some people, yes. But not for a large majority. BTW, today is a national Holiday here. Does anybody know why?smilies/wink.gif

P.S: If you run into Captain.Brodie in any thread, please do tell him that finally I located the MS FS X (deluxe version) and bought and installed. smilies/cool.gif
Alegre Homônimo Dia
written by Lloyd Cata, April 21, 2010
He can always say he was better than Sarney ..

So please stop mixing up things and do not distort facts.


Well aware they are comrades, but you must admit that he is better at keeping the corruption 'at a distance'. smilies/wink.gif Always I have congratulated him on economic progress, and statesmanship. Even still he trumpets himself as PT extraordinaire, and employment is not a thorn, but...but...it is the 'underground economy' that has stirred the pots. Not his championship of Bolsa for the poor. Correctly, Ricardo and Asp condemn the rampant criminality, but we should not hide that it is the Bolsa Criminalidade that has sustained the domestic growth rather than his economic policy. That is not twist, my friend...we have discussed this before.

Mr.Lula is surrounded by important and good advisers to make Brasil an economic powerhouse and one of them is our ex President Mr.Sarney.

Economic powerhouse? I thought you meant the minster from Cornell? Perhaps Mr. Sarney is the one who suggested;
( http://www.brazzilmag.com/comp...ices-.html )
...and of course his successor recommended;
( http://www.brazzil.com/compone...mazon.html )
...but just when I think to give up on my passion for Brazzil;
( http://www.brazzil.com/compone...reams.html )
...so I find myself loving it even more.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif

Yet, life goes on, and I am happy to hear your celebrating your namesake(related?) and wish you many toasts to a 'true' pioneer revolutionary smilies/smiley.gifsmilies/cool.gif
Ricardo Amaral
written by Lloyd Cata, April 21, 2010
Once again, sir, it is with no disrespect to your family that I am opposed to your notions. Perhaps you would understand when I say that my family has collectively, with honor, served more than 100 years in the US military, but I should hardly imagine that such a thing, in any way, qualifies me for Secretary of Defense.
A wonderful family is a treasure and a blessing, and I would hope that my children respect that, as it is indeed a commandment from God that we honor our mother and father.

Here, I express "my" ideas and opinions and 'hopefully' do not reflect badly on my ancestors, yet I know that we live in different times, with different peoples, and different responsibilities. So, within my own family we have animated discussion of the issues. Sometimes heated beyond my ability to explain, yet we are family, we are friends, and I would lay down my life for any one of them.

Please continue to express yourself as you see fit, and as always we will agree on some things, and disagree on others, but if I should bring my families ideas to be my own then that is a fraud and eventually I will be caught without the foundation of my own truth. Perhaps in America we take 'personal freedom' to the extreme, and yet I know that my children are expected to have 'personal responsibility' also, because the very 'personal consequences' are ours, and theirs alone.

Muita arrependido se você és ofendido
...
written by Ederson, April 21, 2010
Yes, Ricardo. I agree with Lloyd Cata. Please don't leave this blog. Your ideas deserve merit, even if some disagree with you, at least for the energy with which you defend them. Indeed, I would be amiss for not telling you that I do learn from you statements and links and am very appreciative of your efforts to keep us informed.
And above all, there can be no doubt for your love of Brazil and family. Many are not so fortunate to have something for which they can belong and be proud. Thanks for the energy you spend to share your ideas.
To Mr. Amaral
written by Glaucia Wagner, April 21, 2010
Your "Brazil's formula for success: dictatorship" is one of the most imoral, revolting, obscene articles I have ever read.
I am shocked that a "writer and economist", that is, a supposedly educated person, can defend a regime that usurped the citizenry from their civil and human rights, torturing, murdering and forcing thousands to exile.
I am glad that some Brazilians commenters have expressed their revulsion or at least disagreement with Mr. Amaral's preposterous point of view. At the same time, I don't understand how others here can comment or reply to this article as if it had any shred of respectability and merited any kind of critical analysis. Contempt and revulsion are the only appropriate responses to this defense of the dictatorship in Brazil (or in anywhere else).
My kudos here to Mr. Lloyd Cata, (whose intelligent, reasoned and extremely well informed posts I've long admired) for having repplied to your deplorable post with his usual civility.
Thanks also to dusty, Luis Otavio Lopes, Corredor, JP3, for having responded with the indignation this article deserves.
I was born in Brazil, by the way, and lived there during the military dictatorship. I have wonderful memories of Brazil, where my family still lives: the people's warmth and friendliness, the country's natural beauty, the wonderful Brazilian music, great artists and writers,delicious food, and so forth. But I also remember the negatives: the poverty of the masses, the rampant crime and the corruption of the political class. Thus, to say that crime and corruption did not exist during the military dictatorship is another falsehood in Mr. Amaral's article.
Reply to Ederson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 22, 2010

Ederson,

Thanks for your kind words.

Yes, I love my family and my country, and I am a diehard nationalist and idealist.

You said: “Please don't leave this blog.”

I am not abandoning this blog. I am actually finalizing my next article for publication – which most information originally was part of this current article. The new article will be available tomorrow at Brazzil magazine.

I just broke the information into 2 articles otherwise the current article would have been too long for the readers.

Thanks again for your support.

By the way, it is amazing to me, and I am almost surprised by the feedback that I am getting on how people who I respect their opinion in Brazil are responding to me, and strongly endorsing the following info that I posted above: “If allowed to run for president General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira then he can count with my vote and the vote of many people that I know.”

Now, I am more convinced than ever that if General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira were allowed to run for president in 2010 – he would win the election in Brazil, and with a strong mandate to reestablish: “ORDEM E PROGRESSO” - (Order and Progress)

http://www.travelblog.org/World/br-flag.html

.
Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, April 22, 2010
Your ideas deserve merit

Heaven forbid I should give 'any' shred of merit to this outrageous proposal! It is only slightly less ridiculous than his "Overpopulated" proposal of ten years ago;
( http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../6963.html ) which seems to be part of his 'theme' of nationalism, population control, and now dictatorship. That he is so eloquent in appealing to Brazilians over the subject of crime to validate his proposal is no mistake. Thank God, the dictatorship is still fresh enough in the minds of rational Brazilians that I am not too concerned.

Don't concern yourself that he will leave because he is too much the egotist and peac**k to leave this site. His fantasy of triumphant return to Brazil never far from the front of his brain, but only after his personal security is guaranteed by a military regime in control.

Oh, BTW, his school in NJ, being just 15 minutes from Manhattan is still in a dump, but understand that the great Columbia University and many other notable educational institutions in NYK are in areas besieged by crime and drugs. In fact, at one time, the area of Columbia was know for high level of rapes on the co-eds. So don't belittle him for his school. I am sure they did the best they could with such a small mind.

...
written by Ederson, April 22, 2010
Lloyd Cata, surely we agree that Ricardo's ideas are far from the mainstream, but I would be wary of the pot calling the kettle black. In addition, I don't believe that you meant to insinuate that Ricardo is a rapist. Granted, he's different, for sure, but associating him with rapists is a little too much.
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 22, 2010

but I should hardly imagine that such a thing, in any way, qualifies me for Secretary of Defense.


Perhaps you think you are better suited to be the POTUS? smilies/cheesy.gif
Cheif Pot Scrubber
written by Simpleton, April 22, 2010
Family matters would preclude suitability for POTUS. When things get heated stepping up and taking the torch is most likely exemplified by retiring to the kitch and being of benefatore service.
...
written by Ederson, April 22, 2010
If the discussion is to revolve around the relative merits of dictators, I can think of few reasons to elaborate on such benefits, though they may exist. And if asked to name my favorite dictator, I am, again, at a loss.
However, if Ricardo is asked to name his favorite dictator, he does have, truthfully, an actual ancestral bias, which may be taken into account.
Mr. Cata has no such ancestral bias, yet Mr. Cata can, and has already, named many "favorite" dictators.
Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, April 22, 2010
I don't believe that you meant to insinuate that Ricardo is a rapist. Granted, he's different, for sure, but associating him with rapists is a little too much.

???WHAT!!?? Where the hell did that come from?
I described as situation in a particular area of NYK where rapes took place, just as he described an area where crime and kidnapping took place. Neither description ascribed those actions to either one of us. Certain I don't approve of crime anywhere and I'm certainly not ascribing rapist actions upon Ricardo. He may have certain strong opinion on the value of his ideas which I interpret as illogical, immoral, and possibly criminal, but I see that my words 'can' be misinterpreted. That is why my responses sometimes are lengthy so there is less confusion.

I.e., don't judge him on where he went to school, but on the product of his education.

Try again to reread the statement and not jump to inflammatory conclusion.
...
written by Ederson, April 22, 2010
My apologies, Mr. Cata. I know that you see Ricardo as immoral, illogical, and potentially a criminal, but you are not as yet accusing him of being a rapist. As I said, I couldn't understand why you would make such an accusation. My mistake for not realizing that as close as New Jersey is to New York, it is not actually in New York. Again, I apologize.
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, April 22, 2010
Perhaps you think you are better suited to be the POTUS?

Touche, mon ami...but I concede that the present person has all the skills, such as patience with far right protagonists, to get the job dome.

Would I have been a better president than 'both' Bush's? You can take your own poll on that...it should be interesting, no?smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif

Let me say this...in another kudo to President Lula. His 'leadership' was not forged in the classroom, or the boardroom, but in the atmosphere of desire for 'fairness' in all sectors of society. That his presidency has not necessarily benefited 'all' sectors is beyond question. His policies have mainly benefited those in the 'ownership' society. Was it expected that his neglect of the have-not's for the last 7 years would have them sit watching the economic growth with their thumb up their arse? So now you have a generation of have-not's who will 'get some' any way possible. Now whomever is the next leader will have to clean up the mess...and quickly(which Ricardo thinks can only be done by coup d'etat). So, hopefully, Lula has learned something, but it is a pity that it was such a hard lesson for Brazil.

It is nothing to be ashamed of, because ideally we spend all our lives learning things we did not know. What the "world" has learned is that a 'socialist' could manage one of the worlds most dynamic economies, and "that" my friends is where President Lula has excelled as not only student but as teacher on the world stage. That he sacrificed the future and safety of so many Brazilians to do this is regrettable, and IMHO was unnecessary.
Moving Brazil Forward, Without Dictatorship
written by Lloyd Cata, April 22, 2010
I have previously put forward some thoughts as to how to fix the crime problem in Brazil, but I would like to expand on some things that could be done.

1) Judicial reform -
No more 2 systems of justice and law. As I have said; if the drug lords steal the past and present of the people, the corrupt steal their future. They should share the same jail. Imagine the immediate effect every time the policeman or politician thinks fill his pockets.

2) Financial reform -
What do you think happens to all the money from the drug trade. Do you think they have warehouses(and some do!) to stash their ill-gotten gains? No, my friends...they use that money to buy and invest, just like the everyone else. There are too many 'legitimate' financial entities willing to look the other way and accept that 'dirty' money. The little guys spend their loot locally, but the kingpins drive their luxury cars up to the front door of the banks and brokerages.

3) Conscription -
It is "my" opinion that every 'citizen' has a debt to the society and the reverse is also true with respect to the society and the citizenry. Every young person between the ages of 16 and 32 should serve 2 years in military or community service. "Every" citizen should have a 'lifetime' commitment to 4 years of military and/or community service. These periods may be somewhat flexible depending on 'qualified' reasons, but must be concluded prior to social retirement age.

After reasonable consideration of these proposals and their "effect" on the dangers presently faced by Brazil, I welcome comments, both good and bad, but let's try to keep the focus on Brazil and its future.
...
written by Ederson, April 22, 2010
Mr. Cata, your suggestions sound strangely American as your country plunges deeper and deeper into socialism under a corrupt president. You mention nothing about an immediate need for safety in the streets or using the military to defend the border and fighting the drug lords.
What about less paperwork, lowered taxes, incentives for hiring new employees? Socialists don't even think of such basics; instead, they dream of more taxes, bigger government, national conscription, and clouds of additional rules and regulations that hide the truth and widen the distance between the classes.
Let's just sit about and dream of idealistic solutions and allow the politicians to pander to us. It works for the Yanks, correct? Give me a break. Want to know what's bad about the world? Look at the States as they sink lower and lower into irresponsibility and malaise. Just because the Americans are all too willing to kiss the backsides of their enemies and become indebted to other countries, again, doesn't mean it's right for the rest of the world. At the moment, I'd suggest that whatever the Yanks are doing, other countries should do the opposite.

Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, April 22, 2010
What about less paperwork, lowered taxes, incentives for hiring new employees?

Spoken like a true capitalist, sir, but...but...how does any of that assist in what we have already agreed is an urgent issue in Brazil. I am certainly for all that you suggest, but not one of those issues is going to solve the issue of the have-not's 'getting some' of the "economic prosperity" that 'everyone' is congratulating President Lula for having achieved?
If you have issue with Ricardo's formula, then I would suggest you issue solutions instead of market ideology, because the alternative is 'tacit' acceptance that there are no other solutions.

I urge you to remember that these items you suggest are consistent throughout US political debate. In truth, the US struggles with the same problems and had them long before Brazil. What we don't try to do is erect walls around them...as you can see it does no good on the Mexican border.(BTW, another Bush fiasco)

Favorite Dictators
written by Lloyd Cata, April 22, 2010
Mr. Cata has no such ancestral bias, yet Mr. Cata can, and has already, named many "favorite" dictators.

Having at least acknowledged Mr. Amaral's education, such as it is, I am beginning to wonder if Mr. Ederson has any at all. He apparently misreads, or pretends to, my positions...so I would suggest that he include amongst my favorites His Holiness, the Pope.

Now let's see how his mind works to untangle that one. smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
...
written by Ederson, April 22, 2010
No problem Mr. Cata. I have no education and am nothing but a simple plantation worker, and neither do i have to untangle your mind. To me, you play both sides of the debate each and every time, and that to me, makes you very interesting.smilies/cheesy.gif
For example, you are both a hater and lover of dictators, depending on the debate, while leaning towards either socialism or free trade, depending on the time of day. You are so inconsistent to me, Mr. Cata, that you often make my day. The day you disappear from this blog, I probably will too. Take care always.smilies/cheesy.gif
FYI
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 22, 2010

April 22, 2010

Ricardo: Today, I received an email from a high school history teacher in New Jersey, and he said the following:

Hey there, FYI: I'm having my students read your article on dictatorship as an assignment. We'll see what they say.


*****


Since a lot of kids are going to read the above article and the comments, please let’s keep the discussion about this article on a civil manner - Meaning with civility: the act of showing regard for others, consideration, courtesy, good manners, cordiality, graciousness, amiability, and courteousness.

This was a very good idea, and I am going to suggest to another friend of mine who is also a high school history teacher here in New Jersey, for him do the same thing with his students.

This subject will be very enlightening for all these young students.

Thank you for your cooperation.

.
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 22, 2010

Mr. Cata, your suggestions sound strangely American as your country plunges deeper and deeper into socialism under a corrupt president. You mention nothing about an immediate need for safety in the streets or using the military to defend the border and fighting the drug lords.
What about less paperwork, lowered taxes, incentives for hiring new employees? Socialists don't even think of such basics; instead, they dream of more taxes, bigger government, national conscription, and clouds of additional rules and regulations that hide the truth and widen the distance between the classes.


Spoken like an honest & hardworking middle class traditional Brasilian, Sir. Please do accept my kudos. For some unknown reasons, our good and erudite scholarly friend Dr.Cata refuses to acknowledge that there are millions of Brasilian capitalists with "Conscience" that want to better the lives of their fellow countrymen.

Of course, we all know that he is mule headed at times-like our other friend Mr.Amaral, but not so much though like Dr.Cata. For example, Mr.Amaral fine tuned his strategy (by listening to us, in a democratic way). But...but... Dr.Cata keeps on trying to kill the possibility of a "Third Candidate", proposed by Mr.Amaral.

But..but..., both of them do not realize that the control of violence, crime, etc; in urban centers have to be dealt with by the Governors, mayors, etc; not by a General. IMHO, if Gen.Heleno is elected through ballot, his task will be to do exactly what you (and I to a certain extent) have been saying all along. To bring "progresso" to the country through "Ordem".

Your comment:

No problem Mr. Cata. I have no education and am nothing but a simple plantation worker, and neither do i have to untangle your mind.


I am also a plantation worker and uneducated. But...but... the God was merciful in giving us brains and teach us how to think.smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
Great “Benevolent and Enlightened Dictators” in world history
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 22, 2010

Ricardo: There are two countries that did an extraordinary job in the last 20 years in lifting the population out of poverty – China and Singapore – these two countries have a form of government: benevolent dictatorship. Chile also did well economically under a system of dictatorship in the last 30 years.

Why India is not having the same economic positive results as China?

China with their type of dictatorship were able to lift approximately 400 million people out of poverty in the last 20 years, at the same time when India, and Brazil had a mediocre performance when compared with China.

The only explanation to justify this immense difference in economic and social results is that China did it under a system of benevolent dictatorship, and India and Brazil had poorer performance results under a system of democracy.

About 20 years ago Singapore was a very poor country, and since they turned that country into a benevolent dictatorship that country became a model for the rest of the world in how to transform the economic and social system of a country and achieve for its population one of the highest standard of living in the world.

Mexico is another democracy that its economy and social system is going through a self-destruction by the criminal gangs, drug lords, and lawlessness in general.

If the model that Brazil wants to follow is the Mexican model then it makes sense to continue with the same democratic system that will guaranty similar results such as we have in Mexico: Anarchy and Chaos.

Do you remember what happened in May of 2006 in Sao Paulo, Brazil (a country under a democratic system) when the criminal gangs terrorized the population of the city of Sao Paulo and create havoc in the city of Sao Paulo for a number of days?

That was just a little taste of things to come.

Just wait and see when Lula is not around anymore starting in January 2011; to keep the anarchy and chaos from getting completely out of control – resulting in severe negative consequences for the Brazilian economy.


*****


There were some great “Benevolent and Enlightened Dictators” in world history, and here is a list of some of the best of them:


1) Jose Bonifacio de Andrada e Silva (Brazil)
http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../6955.html


2) Oliver Cromwell (England)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell


3) Deng Xiaoping (China)
http://www.time.com/time/asia/..._deng.html


4) Napoleon Bonaparte (French)
http://www.essortment.com/all/...r_rxda.htm

… The greatest military leader of modern times…


5) Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal (Portugal)
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sebastião_José_de_Carvalho_e_Melo,_Marquis_of_Pombal[
/url]


6) Getulio Vargas (Brazil)
http://www.v-brazil.com/cultur...f_Pombal[
/url]


6) Getulio Vargas (Brazil)
http://www.v-brazil.com/cultur...argas.html


7) Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Kuan_Yew


smilies/cool.gif The Papacy – The Pope the head of the Roman Catholic Church is considered to be the oldest line of “Benevolent Dictators” in the world.

Even though there were some little bumps along the way such as:

A) The Crusades (8 Crusades)
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/cru1.htm


B) The Inquisition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

.
correction
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 22, 2010

5) Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal (Portugal)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ ...f_Pombal[
/url]

.
Great “Benevolent and Enlightened Dictators” in world history
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 22, 2010

There were some great “Benevolent and Enlightened Dictators” in world history, and here is a list of some of the best of them:


1) Jose Bonifacio de Andrada e Silva (Brazil)
http://www.brazzil.com/compone.../6955.html


2) Oliver Cromwell (England)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oliver_Cromwell


3) Deng Xiaoping (China)
http://www.time.com/time/asia/..._deng.html


4) Napoleon Bonaparte (French)
http://www.essortment.com/all/...r_rxda.htm

… The greatest military leader of modern times…


5) Sebastião José de Carvalho e Melo, 1st Marquis of Pombal (Portugal)
[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Sebastião_José_de_Carvalho_e_Melo,_Marquis_of_Pombal[
/url]


6) Getulio Vargas (Brazil)
http://www.v-brazil.com/cultur...f_Pombal[
/url]


6) Getulio Vargas (Brazil)
http://www.v-brazil.com/cultur...argas.html


7) Lee Kuan Yew (Singapore)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Kuan_Yew


smilies/cool.gif The Papacy – The Pope the head of the Roman Catholic Church is considered to be the oldest line of “Benevolent Dictators” in the world.

Even though there were some little bumps along the way such as:

A) The Crusades (8 Crusades)
http://www.historylearningsite.co.uk/cru1.htm


B) The Inquisition
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spanish_Inquisition

.
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, April 23, 2010

Since a lot of kids are going to read the above article and the comments, please let’s keep the discussion about this article on a civil manner - Meaning with civility: the act of showing regard for others, consideration, courtesy, good manners, cordiality, graciousness, amiability, and courteousness.


A nice assignment the teacher gave the kids, Ricardo. Look forward to hearing their opinions too.
Freedom - A Primer For The Peasant Society
written by Lloyd Cata, April 23, 2010
Ederson -
For example, you are both a hater and lover of dictators, depending on the debate, while leaning towards either socialism or free trade, depending on the time of day. You are so inconsistent to me, Mr. Cata, that you often make my day.


The world, my friends, is neither a tunnel nor a flat expanse. It is a kaleidoscope of people, places, and resources. So, as I turn the globe, the perspective shifts, through geography, history, and culture...in three dimensions. I truly understand that you cannot see it through my eyes, but if you could ...

João da Silva -
Of course, we all know that he is mule headed at times-like our other friend Mr.Amaral, but not so much though like Dr.Cata. For example, Mr.Amaral fine tuned his strategy (by listening to us, in a democratic way). But...but... Dr.Cata keeps on trying to kill the possibility of a "Third Candidate", proposed by Mr.Amaral.


Nothing could be further from the truth! No matter how many times I express my support for General Heleno as a 'candidate' in free and fair elections, some 'instigators' attempt to twist it into either/or support for dictatorship. Sorry to disappoint 'the peasants' in the room, but in future I shall simply remind them to do their own homework and not mimic the excuse of copying others...nor will I do their research.

Ricardo -
If the model that Brazil wants to follow is the Mexican model then it makes sense to continue with the same democratic system that will guaranty similar results such as we have in Mexico: Anarchy and Chaos.


Look around you, wherever you are...just look. What is it you have, what is it you want, what is it you think, that is the product of dictatorship. The author, Mr. Amaral honestly can point to his very existence since dictatorship is his heritage. Yet, he did not leave Brazil for lack of dictatorship. Of that you can be sure! The others 'proudly' describe themselves as peasants, but in so describing they they cling to their peasantry as a badge of honor, knowing full well that in a dictatorship they are likely 'forcing' their own children to wear the same badge. So be it...their progress shall be measured by how well their tongues lick the dictators boots! That I prefer freedom is my heritage, as it was before colonialist ever set eyes upon the New World. "Progress" has not been kind to my people, "Democracy" has not been kind to my people, "Religion" has not been kind to my people...yet, all we have endured that, once more before the end we shall be free again.

Brazil is not Mexico. Canada is not the USA. England is not Germany. Just as each of us must 'choose' internally who we are, so nations must choose internally who they are. Brazil, having attained its independence without protracted war and conflict is truly an anomaly in the world. That alone has special meaning. Brazil having the breadth of half a continent has special meaning. Brazil having 'no' historical 'external' enemies has special meaning. Brazil, a kaleidoscope of colorful people and cultures has a special meaning. Brazil, with the ability to sustain itself independently with resources has special meaning. It is no mistake that I consider Brazil to be the prize. The kaleidoscope may at times be dizzying, but in time, we discover the 'theme' of shape and color.

Dictatorship may be neat and efficient, but it is certainly not innovative, progressive, or humane...not even in the church. The more I hear from Brazil's 'peasantry' the more I find freedom at risk throughout the world, specifically in the Latin American region.
...
written by Ederson, April 23, 2010
Mr. Cata. I enjoy your dissertations. However, as peasants, neither Joao nor I have ever spoken on behalf of a dictatorship. Quite to the contrary, we are both searching for a democratic alternative. Indeed, it is our most admired professor who, many times in the past, has spoken of his admiration for dictators; my blogs have regularly stated my confusion concerning your stance on dictators and the affinity you share with Ricardo for such personalities, while, at the same time, self-praising your devotion to democratic ideals.
I believe that in every case, everything Joao and I have opinionated has been related to identification and confirmation of widespread problems that, while constantly addressed in the mainstream press, seemingly have no solution.
Our appreciation for Ricardo relates to his tireless efforts to identify mutual concerns, not his solutions. In addition, Ricardo has written many other associated opinions that strongly differ from the stated "peasant" opinions on this blog. I also enjoy Ricardo's informative links and unfailing willingness and effort to share his considerable experience in all things historical relating to the world, not just Brazil.
Mr, Cata, you may not have yet earned a doctorate, but much of your writings are worthy of such recognition and of saving for future reading. I can't wait to attend your first lecture as an equal. In the finest Greek tradition, I'll assume it will be a spirited debate. I'll be sure to bring enough cheese, grapes, and liquid refreshments.
With regards, your loyal peasant.
Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, April 23, 2010
I believe that in every case, everything Joao and I have opinionated has been related to identification and confirmation of widespread problems that, while constantly addressed in the mainstream press, seemingly have no solution.
Our appreciation for Ricardo relates to his tireless efforts to identify mutual concerns, not his solutions. In addition, Ricardo has written many other associated opinions that strongly differ from the stated "peasant" opinions on this blog.


Thank you for the clarification, but certainly you know that peasants are not allowed "opinions". Do you pretend to start a new trend here? You still have not answered the first question as to your opinion, so what I will 'allow' is for you and Joao to team up and untangle each others brain before commenting. smilies/cheesy.gif

Understand, that unless the peasants get some backbone Mr. Amaral wins by 'default', because I only have opinion, but you have choice.smilies/wink.gif Given the proclivity of 'censorship' in your environment I really understand the vagueness of your comments, but I'm beginning to think Ricardo has friends you do not want to see in your neighborhood. It should not be lost on the audience that people who do too much reporting are still subject to dictatorial practices in the great democracy that is Brazil.

I don't suppose you have an 'opinion' or 'solution' on that either??

Oh, oh..before I forget...I have given you solutions which you carefully refuse to comment on, and indeed try to twist, but I'm beginning to understand that is the Brazilian way. You see, I am learning a great deal here!smilies/wink.gif
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 23, 2010

The latest exchange of comments between you and Dr.Cata are very interesting, especially regarding the "Censorship" and the "peasants" not permitted to express opinions. Our esteemed friend has a very devious mind indeed! Has done some good research before putting forth challenging and stimulating questions to us.smilies/cool.gif

In case you haven't caught on to it, he is referring to the "censorship" imposed by our ex-President Sarney´s family on "Estadão" through "court orders" last year and Ricardo´s defending the measure in this forum.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif. Probably you were not yet a reader nor a commentator at that time!

If I were Ricardo, I would re- read the comments of you and others in this thread and better my arguments to justify a "Third party Candidate" who doesn't have "Rabo Preso" with Old oligarchies nor the "New Rich". It would also help if he challenges the current "leadership" to postpone the decision to buy French Submarines,Choppers & Fighters, build Belo Monte dam, etc; till a new government is elected.

As I said earlier, I have nothing against Ricardo because of his ancestry nor against his development plans for Brasil. But..but... he could certainly use his personal connections to stop the reckless spending in this election year.

More later.smilies/cheesy.gif
João da Silva
written by Lloyd Cata, April 23, 2010
...regarding the "Censorship" and the "peasants" not permitted to express opinions.

And please do not attribute myself with introducing "peasants" into the discussion. As you clearly know that I have stated many times that 'peasants' should have as much rights and dignity as any other Brazilians.

Thank you
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, April 23, 2010

And please do not attribute myself with introducing "peasants" into the discussion.


Peasants like Sr. Ederson and I will never ever accuse you of doing such thing. It is just that we want every single fellow blogger to know of our humble background and hear our voice.smilies/cheesy.gif

BTW, I don't think Ederson is jingoistic nor xenophobic when he made the first comment about Brasilians making their own planes, submarines, etc; He just confirmed what I have been screaming for years (including during the Presidency of FHC).

Ah, another thing about "Censorship", which you would agree with me. "Controlling" the flow of information through Telecom "infrastructure" is another form of censorship.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif We take up this topic for discussion at another time.smilies/cool.gif
Reply to Joao da Silva
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 27, 2010

Joao da Silva: In case you haven't caught on to it, he is referring to the "censorship" imposed by our ex-President Sarney´s family on "Estadão" through "court orders" last year and Ricardo´s defending the measure in this forum. Probably you were not yet a reader nor a commentator at that time!


*****


Ricardo: Last year I was defending my friend former president Sarney from all the attacks that he received from various articles published by Brazzil magazine.

But I never defended "censorship" in any way or form, since I believe on the freedom of the press, and freedom of speech.

And I have mentioned that a number of times over the years on this forum.

By the way, the feedback that I am getting from Brazil is that most people loved the above article, and people are congratulating me for writing a courageous article about a subject that is tabu in Brazil - and the mainstream media in Brazil is not allowed to touch this subject – even though the subject of the above article is on a lot of peoples mind these days.

.
Part 2 of the above article
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 27, 2010

Regarding the above article:

1) The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
Tuesday, 13 April 2010


Note: The second article was originally part of the first article, but the article was too long and I decided to break it into 2 articles. The material published on the second article serve as a complement material to the first article.


2) Brazil and the New Economic Miracle. The US Has a Lot to Learn!
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
Friday, 23 April 2010
http://www.brazzil.com/compone...l#comments

.
Real events show that Brazil is becoming another Mexico one step at the time
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 28, 2010

27/04/2010

"Senador vítima de atentado culpa o narcotráfico paraguaio-brasileiro"
da France Presse, em Assunção da Reportagem Local
Folha de Sao Paulo – (Brasil)

O senador governista Robert Acevedo, que sobreviveu ao atentado nesta segunda-feira que deixou dois guarda-costas mortos, atribuiu o ataque à máfia do narcotráfico que domina a fronteira entre Paraguai e Brasil.

"Os responsáveis são narcotraficantes paraguaios associados com os brasileiros. Eles estão infiltrados na sociedade e são donos da vida e da morte. Eu me salvei por um milagre", disse Acevedo à imprensa.

O furgão do político sofreu cerca de 40 impactos de bala, sem que a polícia tenha ainda pistas dos atacantes. O senador pelo Partido Liberal sofreu o impacto de dois disparos.

Um de seus guarda-costas morreu ao tentar protegê-lo e o outro foi crivado por balas.

O fato ocorreu em pleno centro da cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero, capital do departamento (Província) de Amambay, separado por uma avenida de Ponta Porã, no Brasil.

Amambay foi declarado em estado de exceção assim como outros quatro departamentos do norte, nos quais foram mobilizados cerca de 3.000 policiais e militares para rastrear a existência de focos de supostos rebeldes autodenominados Exército do Povo Paraguaio (EPP), de esquerda.

A eles foi atribuído o assassinato há uma semana de quatro policiais no Departamento de Concepción, vizinho de Amambay.

Crime internacional

Para Acevedo, no entanto, o EPP não constitui nem um décimo dos bandos de narcotraficantes. "É algo internacional. Sua força é superior à da polícia. Eles têm armas poderosas para defender o poderoso movimento fronteiriço ilegal", relatou.

"Eles transformaram a cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero numa sociedade dominada pelo tráfico. Há políticos locais que estão associados a eles. A maioria dos candidatos políticos são pagos por eles", continuou.

"Para ocultar sua verdadeira atividade no submundo do narcotráfico, dedicam-se à venda de eletrônicos, móveis --comércios de fachada-- e até a entidades beneficentes".

"Eu os denunciava todos os dias, mas agora vejo que é impossível lutar contra eles. São extremadamente poderosos", enfatizou.

Acevedo é um empresário que atua com postos de gasolina e também é proprietário da rádio Amambay AM.

O furgão em que estava no momento do atentado era utilizado nas coberturas diárias da emissora.

PCC

O ministério do Interior paraguaio confirmou as identidades de dois brasileiros detidos como suspeitos do atentado, e indicou que as investigações já estão em estágio avançado.

A chefe de imprensa do ministério, Dolly Olmedo, disse em entrevista por telefone à Folha que os brasileiros Eduardo da Silva, 27, e Marcos Cordeiro Pereira, 34, estão presos na cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero, mas explicou que a polícia paraguaia ainda não tem comprovação da ligação dos dois com o PCC (Primeiro Comando da Capital), informação publicada pela imprensa local.

De acordo com informações do ministério, o senador Acevedo vinha sofrendo ameaças há muitos dias. "Ele já sabia que isto poderia acontecer, mas não tomou os cuidados necessários", disse Olmedo, confirmando ainda que o senador passa bem e já está fora de perigo. Segundo o ministério, o próprio senador teria comentado anteriormente que sua cabeça valeria US$ 500 mil (cerca de R$ 800 mil).

A cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero é a capital de Amambay, um dos Departamentos (Estados) declarados em estado de exceção pelo Parlamento paraguaio para combater a guerrilha EPP. O estado de exceção, decretado por 30 dias, afeta os Departamentos de Concepción, San Pedro, Amambay, Presidente Hayes e Alto Paraguai, onde vivem 800 mil pessoas, quatro deles fazem fronteira com o Brasil.

A polícia descartou qualquer ligação entre o EPP e o atentado desta segunda-feira.

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/f...6684.shtml


***


Atentado

O ataque aconteceu perto do terminal de ônibus da cidade, por volta das 18h (19h em Brasília), de acordo com o site do jornal paraguaio "Ultima Hora".

Os criminosos se aproximaram do carro do senador e dispararam ao menos 40 vezes, segundo as marcas deixadas no veículo, relataram fontes policiais a rádios da capital.

Derlis Arce, secretário do senador, informou à rádio Ñanduti que Acevedo levou dois tiros, um de raspão, e está em estado estável na clínica San Lucas.

Em entrevista à TV Telefuturo, da clínica onde está internado, o senador contou que "por um milagre de Deus não estou como os companheiros que estavam comigo, executados em pleno centro". O motorista Floriano Alonso e o policial Richard Martinez, que protegiam o parlamentar, morreram no ataque.

Acevedo relatou que um motociclista o ajudou a chegar até uma farmácia, em frente à clínica San Lucas, onde ele ficou escondido até que os criminosos fossem embora. Logo depois, atravessou a rua e foi atendido no hospital.

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/f...6655.shtml

.
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 04, 2010

Ricardo: Your question is completely unrealistic – your expectation of a “benevolent dictator” is someone who would be a saint, with a perfect benevolent record on everything.

That is wishful thinking and nothing else, and even the people that we think as “benevolent dictators” they had to make some rash decisions at a certain point, but we judge them by the final results that they accomplished over time. And there is always some collateral damage along the way when you are trying to achieve the desirable goals that would be very good for society on the long run.

You want perfection where there is no perfection and you need to take in consideration the alternative and its disastrous consequences. On your judgment, your expectation from a “benevolent dictator” it is pure utopia.

Democratic system everywhere are having a terrible time fighting back against the illegal drug trade including the United States, European countries, Mexico, Colombia, Afghanistan, and so on…

There are more illegal drugs than ever that are available all over the United States, and it is easier for any kid in the United States to get hold of illegal drugs than to get hold of alcoholic beverages.

The United States has over 2.3 million people in prison today, and more than half of these people are in prison on illegal drug related charges, at an humongous cost for the states in justice system, and prison costs – and many states in the US today spend more money with their prison system than with their educational system.

Sometime in 2007 I was watching the Larry King Show on CNN cable and he was interviewing the Police Commissioner of 3 major towns in the Unite States, I believe they were New York City, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia, and this is what they were talking about: “Today the United States has more than 2 million people who belong to gangs all across the United States – and at the same time the United States has only 1.8 million policemen to keep these guys in check.

These gangs used to be concentrated on large cities, but in the last few years they realized that they can expand their reach very easily, and they started moving all over the place including your neighborhood.”

When this widespread cancer spreads around the country there are many economic consequences related to money laundering and the local economies – including corruption, and unfair competition to people who are in business legally.

You are so afraid of the possible imaginary repression that a “benevolent dictator” could cause – on the other hand when the criminal mafias rule you better follow their rules or they would kill you and your entire family. Talking about a bunch of ruthless people they are on the top of the list.

If you want the drug traffickers and their criminal gangs to rule things in Brazil and eventually Brazil becomes no different than Mexico – if you think that is a better choice then what I can say to you. That reminds of a saying in Brazil: “Quem e burro pede a Deus que o mate e ao diabo que o carregue.”

The choice in Brazil today is not between being a “Democracy vs. Dictatorship” as you want to distort the reality of my article.

The realistic choice in Brazil today is between being a “Benevolent Dictatorship” or being ruled by fast growing corrupt and cancerous criminal system that includes powerful druglords, and criminal gangs calling the shots and terrorizing the Brazilian population.

You are not defending democracy with your point of view, in reality you are defending a cancerous criminal system that have to be destroyed before it undermines and destroy the entire socio-economic system in Brazil.

A benevolent military dictatorship in Brazil is not going to be as bad as you think, and that option might be the missing piece that will help leapfrog the Brazilian socio-economic system to join the elite countries of our planet – in education, state-of-the-art technologies, economic development, and high standard of living.
.
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 04, 2010

In a Nutshell:

Now, I am more convinced than ever that if General Augusto Heleno Ribeiro Pereira were allowed to run for president in 2010 – he would win the election in Brazil, and with a strong mandate to reestablish: “ORDEM E PROGRESSO” - (Order and Progress)
.
Since Mr. Amaral's Mind Is Too Narrow....
written by Lloyd Cata, May 06, 2010
Ricardo,
Understand, my friend, that your arguments may be sincere, you may have many points of fact in your presentation, your warning of the existing and growing danger are recognized, and in both arguments there is sincere concern for the future of Brazil.

That you advocate, now, for General Heleno to enter the election process is good. Whether or not he has the support to win can only be determined at the election. That he will ever lead Brazil can only be determined at the election. Until you understand that, and are willing to concede that the 'people' are the ultimate authority and the ultimate deciders of who shall lead Brazil, your "methodology" is suspect. Only arrogance prevents you from understanding that a Brazilian coup d'etat is simply the result of backward thinking and in no way represents the desire or the future of Brazil.

Can you do that, sir? Can you admit that the methodology of coup d'etat is an admission of failure, and not a result of the success that Brazil has become in some arenas? Can you open your mind to other possibilities to resolve the crime and drugs issues? Are you really such a coward as to run to the false safety of military men with guns? Do you really think so little of the people that you cannot trust them with the truth?

I am not so skilled that I could change your mind. Where we agree is enough and you have my recommendations for future consideration. Those recommendations are, and have always been, 'inclusive' and not 'exclusive' of all Brazilian society.

Sincerely,
Lloyd Cata
Let me clarify one point from my posting...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 06, 2010

When I said: "The realistic choice in Brazil today is between being a “Benevolent Dictatorship” or being ruled by fast growing corrupt and cancerous criminal system that includes powerful druglords, and criminal gangs calling the shots and terrorizing the Brazilian population."

I am not talking about president Lula and his current government, since I actually like and admire president Lula.

I am talking about “the real thing” the actual criminal gangs and druglords.

.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 06, 2010

Lloyd Cata: Can you do that, sir? Can you admit that the methodology of coup d'etat is an admission of failure, and not a result of the success that Brazil has become in some arenas?


******


Ricardo: How many times I have to tell you to get through your mindset?

Democracy has been a complete failure on its response to fight crime: the criminal gangs and the druglords!!!!!!!

Democracy can’t handle the criminal gangs and the druglords, it does not matter if you are talking about the United States, Afghanistan, Mexico, Colombia, or Brazil.

Under democracy Brazil has two choices to become like the United States, spend a each year more on its justice/police/and prison system a lock up over 2.3 million people in prison, or become like Mexico a corrupt country to the core and close to a full blown civil war.

Choice 1) Invest the future of Brazil into a gigantic prison system like the United States, and have more drugs around than ever before.

Choice 2) Eventually the country collapses into a nasty Civil war.


*****


Lloyd Cata: Do you really think so little of the people that you cannot trust them with the truth?


*****


Ricardo: I have been spelling out the truth on my article, and in the comments section of these articles. I have no idea why I can’t get though to you.

I certainly had no problem getting through most of the readers of my articles, and comments. The feedback has been 100 percent in agreement with what I said on my article. And many people are congratulating me because I said on my article what is a lot people’s mind, but they are afraid of saying in public because it is not politically correct. And many people on the mainstream media avoid that subject because they are afraid of the criminal gangs, and the druglords.

Yes, I believe the ground is very fertile, and we are close to the boiling point for a military coup d'etat in Brazil, and invoke martial law (the law administered by military forces that is invoked by a government in an emergency when the civilian law enforcement agencies are unable to maintain public order and safety).

You would be surprised to find out how many Brazilians would approve a military coup d'etat in Brazil today, and would support General Heleno Augusto as the new dictator in Brazil. He has my support, and many people who read my article also would support General Heleno Augusto.

.
Correction
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 06, 2010

Ricardo: I have been spelling out the truth on my article, and in the comments section of these articles. I have no idea why I can’t get through to you.
.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 07, 2010

I have no idea why I can’t get through to you?????

.
Maybe The Masters Of Totalitarianism Can Finally Teach You Something....
written by Lloyd Cata, May 07, 2010
( http://www.breitbart.com/artic..._article=1 )

Democracy has been a complete failure on its response to fight crime: the criminal gangs and the druglords!!!!!!!

See, there is the foundation for your extremism. Democracy has not failed, some leaders have failed in their 'democratic principles'. The entire society cannot be condemned for the failure of certain leaders to perform.

No one is denying your argument for the problem, but as I have clearly shown, "even the masters of totalitarianism have rejected your prescription for a solution to the problem". You have not made your case for dictatorship, sir.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 08, 2010

May 8, 2010

Reply to Lloyd Cata

Ricardo: To make your point against totalitarianism you asked to read the following:

“Russian president slams ‘totalitarian’ USSR”
May7, 2010

President Dmitry Medvedev on Friday slammed the Soviet Union as a totalitarian regime that suppressed human rights, in the most damning assessment of the USSR by a Russian leader in recent years.

In an interview with the Izvestia newspaper published two days before Russia marks the 65th anniversary of victory in World War II, Medvedev said the crimes of wartime dictator Joseph Stalin could never be forgiven.

"The Soviet Union was a very complicated state and if we speak honestly the regime that was built in the Soviet Union... cannot be called anything other than totalitarian," he said.

"Unfortunately, this was a regime where elementary rights and freedoms were suppressed."


*****


Joseph Stalin (born in Georgia on 18 December 1878 – died on 5 March 1953) was the first General Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union's Central Committee from 1922 until his death in 1953. In the years following Lenin's death in 1924, he rose to become the leader of the Soviet Union.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joseph_Stalin


*****


Ricardo: For some reason beyond my comprehension you believe that we can equate the socio-economic conditions prevalent in Stalin’s time in the Soviet Union in the period 1920’s to 1953 with the socio-economic conditions prevalent in Brazil in 2010.

Here are a few clues that might surprise you:

1) Brazil and the Soviet Union had completely different socio-economic systems.

2) In 1917 they had a revolution in Russia that changed their socio-economic system in drastic ways.

3) Regarding the global economy – around 1929 and most of the 1930’s we had the Great Depression.

4) You can’t even compare the history of the Czars in Russia up to 1917 with the history of Brazil up to that time – different country, different people, different economic circumstances, and different mindset.

5) Another thing that might surprise you is the communications system in the 1920’s up to 1953 when Stalin died was a little different than what we have today – as far I can remember in Stalin’s time they did not have 24/7 cable with instant news from around the globe, and they did not have the internet, cel-phones, blackberries, high power computers, and so on…

Cata, you keep mixing up apples and oranges, and you think that they are the same thing.

When the only thing that they have in common is that they are both a fruit.

You are not convincing anyone with your examples, and all you are doing is making a big fruit salad of old irrelevant stuff to Brazil, and nothing else.
.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 08, 2010

Ricardo: By the way, since you like the Soviet Union/Russia theme here is some info for you:

Just in case you miss it when reading the enclosed posting I am going to highlight for you.

In a Nutshell: Another factor hurting Russian democracy is the presence of the “MOB”.


*****


“Russian Democracy”

The Russians experiment in capitalism and democracy has been fraught with corruption, inflation, and poverty.

The entire development of Russia starting from 1990 until today has been a complicated transitional period: the transformation of a unitary state into a federalist democracy. With Vladimir Putin gaining power, many believe the process will go forward, after years of Boris Yeltsin's reign.

Democracy has been hurt by many of Boris Yeltsin's economic reforms. His attempt to move from public to private ownership has been fraught with problems. Over the past five years, domestic production has dropped 41 percent and unemployment has risen 7 percent. Rampant inflation--which has caused prices to rise as much as 2,500 percent--has at times made food and other necessities unaffordable. Statistics show that 20 percent of Russians are now living under the official poverty level. Some Russians wish for the days of Communism where at least they had food and basic health care.

There are many subjects in the federation like Chechnya who want nothing to do with Russia. They want to be a separate Muslim run entity. This dis-unity cannot help a growing democracy.

Another problem with the democracy in Russia is the inability for the government to collect taxes. The rich are finding ways around paying the government and the poor have no money to give the government. This creates a large problem in a growing economy. A democracy cannot run when it is bankrupt.

Another factor hurting Russian democracy is the presence of the mob. After communism fell, the mob grew strong. The mob has taken a huge role in Russian society and has managed to get a foothold in the Russian government.

There are many ways to help the democracy in Russia. First, Russia needs more public ownership. A socialist democracy would help its people much more than the type of democracy the people have been living under. One needs to just take a look at Britain or Denmark to see how this should be run.

…The tax problem has been addressed with Putin's government suggesting a low flat tax. This will result in the rich having an incentive to pay the tax.
Without gaining the taxes of the new rich the government cannot hope to run. The Russian problems are hurting this growing democracy. True freedom in Russia cannot occur until the problems are addressed.

Source:
http://www.allsands.com/histor...wsl_gn.htm


*****


“The doubts over Russia’s democracy”
BBC News
Friday, 3 December 1999
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/548518.stm


*****


What Happened to Russian Democracy?
NPR Org – March 8, 2007
http://www.npr.org/templates/s...Id=7762959


*****


May 8, 2010

Ricardo: Lloyd Cata, why instead of using some irrelevant examples from around the world about dictatorship that has nothing to do with Brazil – why don’t you use the actual examples that we have had in Brazil in the past?

Please build your case based on what has happened in Brazil in the past when Brazil was under a system of dictatorship – we have had plenty of experiences in that area on our own history. That would be relevant to our discussion and also would apply to the socio-economic conditions that we have in Brazil.

The rest it is just pure BS, and nothing else. And you know it.

.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 08, 2010


Cata, I don't know why you have a real hard time understanding this simple concept?

"Another factor hurting Russian democracy is the presence of the mob. After communism fell, the mob grew strong. The mob has taken a huge role in Russian society and has managed to get a foothold in the Russian government."

.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 08, 2010

They forgot to highlight on that piece that today the Russian Mafia controls the Russian economy, and that is a major obstacle to further socio-economic progress in Russia.

.
Congratulations to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva - Part 1 of 2
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 08, 2010

Part 1 of 2

Ricardo: Congratulations to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.

Time magazine has just named President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva – Brazil’s incumbent and charismatic leader the world's most influential leader.

President Lula has been doing a lot of things that are right for Brazil on the long run, and here is another area that I wrote many articles on this subject and I am glad some people in Brazil has common sense and they are implementing a very essential plan to protect the future of Brazil as an independent country.


*****


“Is Brazil Developing the Bomb?”
By Hans Rühle
SPIEGELnet GmbH
May 7, 2010

Brazil has signed the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, but experts suspect it may be working on a nuclear bomb. The country is allowed to legally enrich uranium for its nuclear submarines, but nobody knows what happens to the fuel once it is on restricted military bases.

In October 2009, the prestigious American periodical “Foreign Policy” published an article titled “ The Future Nuclear Powers You Should Be Worried About.” According to the author, Kazakhstan, Bangladesh, Burma, the United Arab Emirates and Venezuela are the next candidates -- after Iran -- for membership in the club of nuclear powers. Despite his interesting arguments, the author neglected to mention the most important potential nuclear power: Brazil.

Nowadays, Brazil is held in high esteem by the rest of the world. Its president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has become a star on the international stage. "That's my man right here," US President Barack Obama once said, in praise of his Brazilian counterpart. Lula, as he is known, can even afford to receive Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad with all honors and demonstratively endorse his nuclear program, for which Iran is now ostracized around the world.

Lula da Silva's self-confidence is indicative of Brazil's claim to the status of a major power -- including in military terms. The military claim is reflected in the country's National Defense Strategy, which was unveiled in late 2008. In addition to the mastery of the complete nuclear fuel cycle -- which has since been achieved -- the document calls for the building of nuclear-powered submarines.

Close to Building a Bomb

It sounds harmless enough, but it isn't, because the term "nuclear-powered submarines" could in fact be a cover for a nuclear weapons program. Brazil already had three secret military nuclear programs between 1975 and 1990, with each branch of its armed forces pursuing its own route. The navy's approach proved to be the most successful: using imported high-performance centrifuges to produce highly enriched uranium from imported uranium hexafluoride, so as to be able to operate small reactors for submarines. At the appropriate time, the country's newly acquired nuclear capabilities were to be revealed to the world with a "peaceful nuclear explosion," based on the example set by India. The 300-meter (984-foot) shaft for the test had already been drilled. According to statements by the former president of the National Nuclear Energy Commission, in 1990 the Brazilian military was on the verge of building a bomb.

But it never came to that. During the course of Brazil's democratization, the secret nuclear programs were effectively abandoned. Under the country's 1988 constitution, nuclear activities were restricted to "peaceful uses." Brazil ratified the Treaty for the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean in 1994 and, in 1998, the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty (NPT) and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty. Brazil's flirtation with the bomb had apparently ended.

Under Lula da Silva, however, this flirtation has now been reignited, and the Brazilians are becoming less and less hesitant about toying with their own nuclear option. Only a few months after Lula's inauguration in 2003, the country officially resumed the development of a nuclear-powered submarine.

Even during his election campaign, Lula criticized the NPT, calling it unfair and obsolete. Although Brazil did not withdraw from the treaty, it demonstratively tightened working conditions for inspectors from the International Atomic Energy Authority (IAEA). The situation became tense in April 2004, when the IAEA was denied unlimited access to a newly built enrichment facility in Resende, near Rio de Janeiro. The Brazilian government also made it clear that it did not intend to sign the additional protocol to the NPT, which would have required it to open previously undeclared facilities to inspection.

In mid-January 2009, during a meeting of the Nuclear Suppliers Group, a group of nuclear supplier countries that works toward nonproliferation by controlling exports of nuclear materials, the reasons for this restrictive policy became clear to attendees when Brazil's representative did his utmost to fight requirements that would have made the nuclear submarine program transparent.

.
Congratulations to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva - Part 2 of 2
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 08, 2010

Part 2 of 2

'Open to Negotiation'

Why all this secrecy? What is there to hide in the development of small reactors to power submarines, systems that several countries have had for decades? The answer is as simple as it is unsettling: Brazil is probably also developing something else in the plants it has declared as production facilities for nuclear submarines: nuclear weapons. Vice President José Alencar offered a reason when he openly advocated Brazil's acquisition of nuclear weapons in September 2009. For a country with a 15,000-kilometer border and rich offshore oil reserves, Alencar says, these weapons would not only be an important tool of "deterrence," but would also give Brazil the means to increase its importance on the international stage. When it was pointed out that Brazil had signed the NPT, Alencar reacted calmly, saying it was "a matter that was open to negotiation."

How exactly could Brazil go about building nuclear weapons? The answer, unfortunately, is that it would be relatively easy. A precondition for the legal construction of small reactors for submarine engines is that nuclear material regulated by the IAEA is approved. But because Brazil designates its production facilities for nuclear submarine construction as restricted military areas, the IAEA inspectors are no longer given access. In other words, once the legally supplied enriched uranium has passed through the gate of the plant where nuclear submarines are being built, it can be used for any purpose, including the production of nuclear weapons. And because almost all nuclear submarines are operated with highly enriched uranium, which also happens to be weapons grade uranium, Brazil can easily justify producing highly enriched nuclear fuel.

Even if there is no definitive proof of Brazil's nuclear activities (yet), past events suggest that it is highly likely that Brazil is developing nuclear weapons. Neither the constitutional prohibition nor the NPT will prevent this from happening. All it would take to obtain a parliamentary resolution to eliminate these obstacles would be for Lula da Silva to say that the United States is not entitled to a monopoly on nuclear weapons in the Americas. If that happens, Latin America would no longer be a nuclear weapons-free zone -- and Obama's vision of a nuclear-free world would be finished.

http://www.spiegel.de/internat...ml#ref=rss

.
And Then He Proceeds To Make The Case For Democracy....Wonderful
written by Lloyd Cata, May 08, 2010
That would be relevant to our discussion and also would apply to the socio-economic conditions that we have in Brazil.

You see, sir, that is the additional fallacy in your quest for dictatorship. You equate "behavior" with economic or social situation. Whether it was 1920 Russia or 2010 Brazil; doesn't matter. The behavior of tyrants is "never" legitimate...get it?

Then you go on to praise the current leadership as if their not the ones responsible for the present mess of crime and drugs. Perhaps if there were some balance in your argument you would appear more credible, but since you still fail to 'renounce' your love of 'dictatorship', it goes without saying that these are the ramblings of a disordered mind, and invites careful analysis of future "behavior".

Uuugghh....we must have ventured into another area, of nuclear ambitions....I don't know why, but if you want my input, then simply check the archives. There you will find that I 'reluctantly' agree with a certain Brazilian admiral, who appeared on this site(several years ago) to advocate for a nuclear Brazil. See, your foresight is as flawed as your hindsight, but I'm still hopeful for a cure.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 09, 2010

Ricardo: I am showing to you a number of examples how a democratic system it does not matter in which country the democratic system is from including such countries as the United States, Mexico, Brazil, Russia, Colombia, Afghanistan and so on…- they all have one thing in common they all failed in one way or another on their efforts in dealing with the illegal drug trade, the criminal gangs, and the druglords.

I don’t know why you can’t grasp that fact?

One of the few countries that is winning that war against the illegal drug trade is China and they had 2 recent cases that called the attention of the international mainstream media - 1) a British citizen and 2) a Japanese citizen – on how to deal with that problem.

In both cases it was 1, 2, 3 and problem solved.

And in both cases the governments of the UK and Japan were fighting on behalf of the international druglords: 1) a British citizen and 2) a Japanese citizen.

China has the right way of fighting against the illegal drug trade: 1, 2, 3 problem solved.

That solution would never work under a government democratic system.


*****


Mr. Cata you know you lost the argument, and you can’t make your case using the experiences that Brazil had in the past with dictatorship – Brazil had 2 separated periods under a system of dictatorship in the last 100 years: 1) under Getulio Vargas and 2) a military dictatorship under many military leaders.

These 2 periods that add up to almost 36 years should serve as a base for what a dictatorial system means in terms of Brazil. These are actual examples and they are part of our history. Please stop using what happened in the Soviet Union, the Sudan, North Korea, and so on as if these examples where relevant to Brazil.

Why are you afraid of building your case using the actual past experiences that we had in Brazil with a dictatorial system of government?

These experiences are more realistic, and relevant to our discussion since they apply to similar circumstances and to the same people that the article is talking about.

As I explain to you the dictatorship in the Soviet Union under Joseph Stalin has nothing to do with Brazil in any way. If you can’t grasp that simple fact then you have a real problem understanding the subject that we have been discussing about it.

I have a few questions for you since you think Joseph Stalin is so relevant to our discussion about Brazil as follows:

Here is some information about Joseph Stalin’s background:

“Joseph Stalin as a Georgian and a member of a minority group who had written about the problems of non-Russian peoples living under the Tsar, Stalin was seen as the obvious choice as “Commissar of Nationalities.” It was a job that gave Stalin tremendous power for nearly half the country's population fell into the category of non-Russian. Stalin now had the responsibility of dealing with 65 million Ukrainians, Georgians, Byelorussians, Tadzhiks, Buriats and Yakuts.

The policy of the Bolsheviks was to grant the right of self-determination to all the various nationalities within Russia. This was reinforced by a speech Stalin made in Helsinki on November 16th, 1917. Stalin promised the crowd that the Soviet government would grant: "complete freedom for the Finnish people, and for other peoples of Russia, to arrange their own life!" Stalin's plan was to develop what he called "a voluntary and honest alliance" between Russia and the different national groups that lived within its borders.

Over the next couple of years Stalin had difficulty controlling the non-Russian peoples under his control. Independent states were set up without his agreement. These new governments were often hostile to the Bolsheviks. Stalin had hoped that these independent states would voluntarily agree to join up with Russia to form a union of Socialist States.”

.
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 09, 2010

Questions to Mr. Lloyd Cata:

1) First question to you regarding the Bolshevik revolution that you think it is underway in Brazil – the Bolsheviks are trying to unite into the Brazilian Soviet Union the other republics of South America such as Paraguay, Uruguay, Venezuela, Colombia, and so on…or they are trying to consolidate the foreign republics of Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Parana, Para, and so on….

2) Since Joseph Stalin, was born in Gori, Georgia – where do you think the new Brazilian Bolshevik tyrant that you are so afraid of is coming from? Is this Ze Bolshevik coming from Goiania, Goias?

On your mind this new Brazilian “Commissar of Nationalities” similar to Joseph Stalin among other things is he going to demand that people speak Portuguese on the independent republics of Amazonas, Mato Grosso, Minas Gerais, Rio de Janeiro, Sao Paulo, Rio Grande do Sul, Parana?

Are the peasants of all these republics aware and ready for this Bolshevik revolution that you think is coming to Brazil?

Now I can see with some clarity why with all these similarities between the Soviet Union history and our present Brazilian history – I can see why it would be a perfect example for you to build your case against my article using the example of Joseph Stalin.

With evidence like that Mr. Cata - you just made your case that a Bolshevik revolution would be bad for Brazil.

By the way, I agree with you, since I also don’t want a Bolshevik revolution in Brazil.

The current economic system in Brazil is not perfect, and needs to be fine-tuned here and in there, but your idea of a Bolshevik revolution is completely crazy.

I have no idea how you came to the conclusion that I was suggesting in any way on my article that Brazil needs a Joseph Stalin type Bolshevik revolution.

Your mind is getting completely out of control with the conclusions that you arrive to after reading an article.

What are you going to use next to compare to Brazil? - The government of Roberto Mugabe in Zimbabwe? - Roberto Mugabe is also a dictator – a real bad one…

Now let’s go back to a relevant discussion regarding my article about a benevolent military dictatorship in Brazil.

.
...
written by Ederson, May 10, 2010
Dr. Cata is back and in fine style! I'll start reading the blogs again.smilies/wink.gif
Reply to Lloyd Cata
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 11, 2010

Lloyd Cata: Then you go on to praise the current leadership as if their not the ones responsible for the present mess of crime and drugs.


*****


Ricardo: That is a major problem with democracy – the people in power is more interested on re-election and in keeping their power base than in fixing the problems that need to be fixed.

Yesterday I saw a program on the BBC about Brazil that gave a complete distorted picture of what is going on in Sao Paulo and Rio de Janeiro.

Instead of giving a balance point of view – and show what the criminal gangs are doing to destroy the fabric of civil society on these towns – the BBC news did not show what kind of crime the gang members did, they just show their funeral with their mother, sister, and girlfriend crying because these guys were shot by the police.

They did show a bunch of funerals, and one thing that I thought was interesting and called my attention is that on these funerals they had almost only women present, and no men to these funeral services.

That program was made for you to feel sorry for the criminals that died fighting the police.

I could not believe the BBC News would make such a one sided program on behalf of the criminals.

.
Ricardo Amaral
written by Lloyd Cata, May 11, 2010
but your idea of a Bolshevik revolution is completely crazy.

I will ignore the rest of your rant because these(above) are the words you would like to pin on me, when it is yourself who proposes General Heleno in the role of Stalin.

That I am a Socialist and support the liberation of Latin America and its economies from empirical domain is no secret in the blogosphere. Since you have committed to the dictatorship, whether benevolent or not, is no secret either. I say that with all due respect to the past Brazilian regimes that you identify as being 'benevolent'. Since you refrain from discussing the methodology or the behavior of your champions of Brazilian history, wishing instead to portray me as a Bolshevik, I see little sense in continuing the discussion.(There are more pressing issues than Ricardo Amaral's love of dictatorship!)

You should have little trouble returning to Brazil for the elections and I hope your campaign for dictatorship reaches the entire population of Brazil. If they embrace your fantasy of 'benevolent dictatorship' it will be the choice of the people and I can respect that. I am hopeful that you can accept 'the peoples choice' in the same manner.



Ederson
written by Lloyd Cata, May 11, 2010
Dr. Cata is back and in fine style! I'll start reading the blogs again.


Sorry, my friend, but my time is very short and I will not comment during the 'official' election period. Surely, you understand that it is a Brazilian decision and I only wish you to choose the leaders Brazil requires to move forward in an intelligent, productive, and merciful way for all Brazilians.

Thank you for following, and God-willing I will return after the elections to comment on the way forward.
Llyod Cata
written by João da Silva, May 12, 2010

Surely, you understand that it is a Brazilian decision and I only wish you to choose the leaders Brazil requires to move forward in an intelligent, productive, and merciful way for all Brazilians.


Currently the "choices" are quite limited in all levels,both national and state.smilies/smiley.gifsmilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif

Thank you for following, and God-willing I will return after the elections to comment on the way forward.


Before you leave on your new "assignment", would really appreciate your brief analysis of the reasons for the labor party in the U.K., being voted out of power after 13 years. Italy voted Berlusconi (conservative) to power. The Chileans voted for a conservative for the power,in spite of Madame Bachelert´s supporting of the candidate of her party. As you know, the lady´s popularity among the Chileans was as high as that of Mr.Lula among the Brasilians. I keep on wondering whether we are going to follow this trend.



We need a real punisher ( death penlty )
written by Fernandinho, May 15, 2010
I agree in the way that Brazil needs more patriotic leaders, that cannot be corrupted. Leaders that can invest in education and clean up all the rotten criminal scum that created roots in this land. Leaders interested in the safety of brazilian citizens.

Education and real punishment law are what Brazil has lost plenty in the past years. Criminal activity rates became unbearable at this time.

Does anyone remember "champinha" and thousand other psychopats ? They one day will be released from jail. In a serious and competent government this would never happen.
Deputado Federal (SP) - direct response to the above article.
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, June 17, 2010
June 16, 2010

Yesterday, I was surprised when I received an email from a Deputado Federal (Congressman) representing the state of Sao Paulo in Brasilia.

The email said:

“Prezados amigos, cidadãos e policiais,

Esta semana, possivelmente levaremos a discussão no Plenário da Câmara dos Deputados as PECs 300, 308 e 549. Após muito esforço e luta, conseguiremos fazer com que nossos policiais recebam o merecido reconhecimento pelo excelente trabalho que desempenham na proteção da sociedade….”


******


After checking the web I found this info about PEC’s 300, 308 and 549:

“PECs 549, 300 e 308 serão analisadas por comissão especial da Câmara”

Da Agência Câmara

O presidente da Câmara, Michel Temer, anunciou nesta terça-feira, após a reunião de líderes, a criação de comissão especial formada por seis integrantes – três indicados pela liderança do governo e três pela liderança da Minoria – com o objetivo de encontrar um texto consensual para colocar em votação a PEC 300/08, que trata da remuneração dos policiais militares. A proposta já foi aprovada em primeiro turno….


*******


I guess this Brazilian Deputado Federal (Congressman) sent me this email from the Camara dos Deputados in Brasilia in response to my article:

1) The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
Tuesday, 13 April 2010

.

International crime networks is a global problem.
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, June 20, 2010

“UN warns of crime gangs’ global muscle”
By James Blitz – in London
Financial Times (UK) – June 18, 2010

International crime networks now enjoy such an extensive reach that the gangs behind them must be regarded as a significant economic power, says a United Nations report.

In one of the most comprehensive analyses undertaken of transnational criminal activity, the UN Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) has calculated that the illicit trade in a range of commodities - including drugs, people, arms, fake goods and stolen natural resources - has an annual value of roughly $130bn (€105bn, £88bn).

The report shows how transnational crime continues to be dominated by the trade in cocaine and heroin, a business whose product is worth about $105bn a year.

But it suggests other criminal activities, including the trafficking of natural resources, product counterfeiting and maritime piracy, are becoming of increasing concern to the international community.

One of the report's main purposes is to persuade world powers to think harder about how they can combat the illicit trade in goods and people.

"Transnational crime has become a threat to peace and development, even to the sovereignty of nations," said Antonio Maria Costa, the UNODC's executive director. "Today, the criminal market spans the planet: illicit goods are sourced from one continent, trafficked across another, and marketed in a third."

Mr Costa said trans-national crime has become so intense that it risks undermining a number of states, most notably in Africa. The world's big powers are showing "benign neglect" towards a problem that is hurting everyone, "especially poor countries that are not able to defend themselves".

Cocaine trafficking from the Andean region to North America, a business with an annual value of $38bn, is the biggest sector in the illegal narcotics trade. The export of cocaine from the Andean region to Europe is worth about $34bn a year.

However, the UNODC believes that the North American cocaine market is shrinking because of lower demand and greater law enforcement. It says this has generated a turf war among trafficking gangs, particularly in Mexico, and prompted them to forge new drug routes.

By contrast, the heroin trade from Afghanistan to Russia and Europe - worth $33bn a year - remains strong. The UNODC says heroin kills 30,000 to 40,000 young Russians a year - twice the number of Red Army soldiers killed during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan in the 1980s.

The second-biggest sector in international organised crime is people trafficking. The trade in women for sexual exploitation is now worth about $3bn a year. Much of the trade involves trafficking people from Africa and the Balkans to other parts of Europe, where about 140,000 women are being manipulated by gangs at any one time.

The illegal smuggling of economic migrants is worth about $6.6bn a year to those who run the trade, according to the report.

The dominant illegal migrant flow is across the southern border of the US, with about 3m Latin Americans illegally moving to North America each year. Flows from Africa to Europe are far smaller, with about 55,000 migrants smuggled into Europe in 2008.

The trade in fake manufactured goods has an estimated value of $8.2bn, based on European seizures and consumer surveys,

and the annual trade in counterfeit medicines is worth $1.6bn.

The report estimates that illicit wood products imported from Asia to the European Union and China were worth $2.5bn last year.

.
Democracy and true freedom is the only way out.
written by Francine Muller, February 11, 2011
I think most of you kind of missed the point here.
The rise on crime in Brazil and all the power which the "gangs" got in the last 20 years were just possible because of all the political and economical instability after the end of the dictatorship.
A dictatorship as the one of 64-85 ( I don't really believe it's correct to call Vargas times as dictatorship - how many presidents did US had between the years of 1930-1045) brainwashes people. Classes like philosophy and sociology were not allowed to be given in high schools, History and Geography textbooks were altered, plus all the censorship (how can we analyze what happened during 64-85 looking through just one side of the scope?). After 20 years of oppression "the people" had no idea how to restore the power and build a strong and honest government. Instability and power shifts are very common when a country leaves a long period of dictatorship. Between the years of 85-94 Brazil was in a time of "smoky-mirrors Democracy". It was officially called Democracy but the power was still in the hands of the old party. Still now in 2011 we see some children of the old ruling power in the "houses". In an environment like this it's common see other powers rising. The government was too busy with itself that Brazil became a paradise for outlaws. Concluding, dictatorship is not the solution but the cause of all the organized crime that rose in Brazil during the last 2 decades. Dictatorship threw Brazil back 100 years in politics, economics and social awareness. It will take time, but with steady democracy the people will regain full power and throw the criminals out.
One more thing, US is one of the biggest consumers of narcotics and human traffic. Therefore, if Brazil should fall in dictatorship because of it's lack of control on the crime so should US. It's easy to support tyrannic governments in pro of it's on interests while having a Democracy at home. Maybe Americans should try a little of it's on poison and have their own freedom, something they so often proudly praised, taken away. Egyptians out there don't you agree with me.

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack