Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33081525

Who's Online

We have 701 guests online



Brazil and the New Economic Miracle. The US Has a Lot to Learn! PDF Print E-mail
2010 - April 2010
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral   
Friday, 23 April 2010 01:49

Brazil ethanolWhen the sovereignty wealth funds of the world (including countries such as China, Saudi Arabia, and so on..) look around for places to invest their money for the long-term, they don't need to look any further than Brazil. Today, Brazil is positioned to become a powerhouse in the global economy in the coming years, and one of the great economic development stories of the 21st Century.

The United States Economy

Wall Street corporations were designed for the sole purpose of making profits, and they are in the money business - of making a lot of money or losing a ton of it. As the dot.com meltdown of 2000, and the stock market crash of 2008 have shown us, Wall Street is more in tune with losing trillions of US dollars with their gambling schemes and all kinds of financial shenanigans, than anything else.

And they are also capable of not only losing trillions of US dollars from investors from around the world, but also the pension nest eggs of American workers built over a long period of time. And trillions of US dollars have gone up in smoke almost overnight during every stock market meltdown we had such as in 2000, and in 2008; resulting in a real pension nightmare in the coming years for U.S. retirees and to retirees of other countries as well.

The U.S. economy is in deep trouble and dying a slow death with no hope for meaningful change in sight. The current US economic and government system is heavily influenced by powerful lobbying groups that want to keep the status quo going and their self-serving agendas in place, and making it almost impossible for the system to change and adapt to the new economic circumstances.

And some corporations such as Goldman Sachs have infiltrated the US government at the highest levels with their network of former Goldman Sachs executives in an effort to influence US government policies on behalf of the financial and banking industry and their financial games.

I just read the book "It Takes a Pillage - Behind the Bailouts, Bonuses, and Backroom Deals from Washington to Wall Street" by Nomi Prins, a book published in October 2009. The book explains in detail the demise and complete destruction of the US economy by the power brokers of Wall Street.

After reading this book you finally will understand why the new generations of Americans don't have any future and how Wall Street stole their future and wasted the money to the tune of trillions of US dollars. The author gives an outstanding explanation and detailed information about what happened in the US financial markets that ended up in a global financial meltdown.

After reading this book you will have a much better understanding about what is going on with the US economy today, how we got to this point and the massive trouble that lies ahead of us.

Basically there is only one conclusion for this massive financial mess made in the USA, and the year 2008 marks the end of an era, and the capitalist brand of America.

Nomi Prins is a former managing director at Goldman Sachs, and her book exposes the corruption in Washington and Wall Street. Her articles are published in Fortune magazine, the Nation, Mother Jones, and other publications. And her latest book has become an important source of information about the corruption in Washington and its connection to Wall Street.

The book shows how the revolving door between Wall Street and Washington enabled and encouraged the disastrous behavior of large investment banks. You'll meet the Pillage People: the men who funneled trillions of dollars directly to the banks and the executives whose companies drained the American economy.

And if you don't believe me that the US economic system is in deep trouble and beyond repair, then you don't need to look any further than what has transpired in the United States since the financial meltdown of 2008. The US financial system ended up in intensive care, and almost died a quick death. And what has happened in the United States since then regarding any efforts by Congress to try to fix the problems that caused the collapse of the US and global financial system in 2008?

As usual, Americans learned nothing from these past fiascos, and if anything the problems are becoming even bigger today with much bigger surviving financial institutions that are fighting very hard against any government regulation of their business, and they use their powerful lobbying connections to fight very hard to keep things as they were before the last financial meltdown.

How dumb can you be? And next time, when the coming collapse and financial meltdown become a reality once again, then the safety net of the US government won't be there. This time around Wall Street has exhausted the financial resources of the United States.

Remember, since the Wall Street bailouts of 2008, the scoundrels of Wall Street have consistently been milking all the US government resources to the bone, and they also have been putting in place a structure for another major US government bailout of Wall Street in the future - for US taxpayers to pay for the bets that went sour for Wall Street.

When it comes to forms of corruption, in Brazil they still have a crude and old system and they use terms that include: bribery, extortion, cronyism, nepotism, patronage, graft, and embezzlement. In contrast, the United States has a much more polished and sophisticated corruption system called lobbying. And the American lobbying system works in a very efficient way by buying favors directly from the politicians through campaign contributions. 

US Economic and Financial System Is Incapable of Meaningful Change

Let me give you another major example that would explain why the US economic and financial system is doomed, and incapable of meaningful change.

I remember a program that I saw on PBS a few years ago about the US oil industry - if I remember correctly the program about the US oil industry was made by Frontline.

Anyway, the American economic and financial system is in shambles, and it does not have a prayer to get better any time soon, because of the way lobbying and the free market work. The oil companies don't want to give up their monopoly position, and they try to undermine in every way they can, any meaningful change to the rules of the game that affects the US oil industry - the US economic history of the last 35 years shows that Americans learned nothing from the oil shock of the 1970's.

The United States has an economic system heavily influenced by powerful lobbying groups that makes it impossible to make meaningful change over time. And as the price of oil increases, the result is that hundred of billion dollars in real wealth is exported from the United States economy to the oil producing countries around the world. The US dependence on foreign oil becomes a vehicle to transfer wealth from the United States to other parts of the world. 

A Legacy of the Military Government in Brazil: Ethanol
 
On the other hand, Brazil did not fix its energy problem based on free market solutions. If Brazil depended on the goodwill of free market players to fix its dependence on imported oil, then Brazil still would be a slave to that market like the United States still is today. During the oil shock of the 1970's Brazil imported from foreign sources about 90 percent of its oil needs in Brazil, and in 2010 Brazil is an oil exporting country.

Who had the guts to fix that huge problem in Brazil?

The generals did! In the mid 1970's when we had that major global oil crisis, the Brazilian economy was hurt very badly. Brazil had a military dictatorship at that time, and the generals decided that Brazil was going to fix that energy problem, and they put in place all the rules and regulations, and necessary financial incentives, to help develop ethanol production on a large scale in Brazil.

Brazil was able to develop the ethanol industry, and its distribution system based on sugar cane, because of the superb military government planning and implementation of that plan.

The State-of-the-art in Modern Technology

In early May 2007, I attended in New York City a very interesting forum: "The Sustainable Development Forum 2007 - Ethanol and Biofuels" - and one of the most interesting presentations in that forum was given by the president of Fiat.

The Fiat president presented a very interesting slide show - basically he described the development of the car industry in Brazil in the last 30 years caused by the use of ethanol and all the breakthroughs and improvements that they had to make on their car engines because of ethanol - and today they have a flex-fuel system that is an extraordinary achievement, and a major example of the state-of-the-art in modern technology.

The United States is supposed to be a democracy, and free market economy. But is the free market system really smart?

I don't think so! After the global oil shock in the mid 1970's, if anything the US economy learned nothing from that fiasco, and today the US economy is more dependent on foreign oil than they were in the mid 1970's. And the US economy is dependent on importing oil from the most-unstable geopolitical areas of the world.

In Brazil ethanol production is made of sugar cane that gives 10 times more ethanol than ethanol made from corn. Americans were aware that the Brazilian ethanol production made from sugar cane was a lot more efficient than ethanol made of corn. And guess what ethanol production system was adopted by the United States free market economy? - The ethanol made from corn; because the United States has a very powerful corn lobby that influences US government policy.

Basically the current free market system, and the self-interest of a few groups with deep pockets (the lobbying groups) does not allow the US economy to bite the bullet. Americans need to make the necessary adjustments to place the US economy on a new path for long-term survival based on new sources of clean energy, and resulting in new growth and prosperity for the new generation of Americans. 

The generals and their dictatorship system put in place the foundations that made Brazil use home-grown sugar cane as a source of energy independence. And here is a lesson about "oil self-sufficiency" from Brazil to the United States: "Brazil imported around 90 percent of its oil needs in the 1970s, but turned itself into a net exporter of oil in 2006."

Brazilian Independence from Foreign Oil

April 21, 2006 marked an end to decades of Brazilian dependence on foreign oil, and fuel bills that plunged Brazil into debt when oil prices soared in the 1970s. On that date President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva flipped the switch on a new oilrig that will usher in overall Brazilian independence from foreign oil.

As the Brazilian economy moves forward into the future with a very smart government energy policy, at the same time the United States economy becomes more risky with every passing day when you consider that the United States is so dependent on "foreign oil." And the oil that the US needs to fuel its economy comes from places that are swamped with geopolitical trouble as in the areas of major civil wars such as in Iraq (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, UAE, and Iran) and in Nigeria, and so on.

And today the United States can't guarantee to keep its future supply of oil coming even from next door in Venezuela, since China slowly is taking away from the United States that source of energy.

As Brazil is becoming the model for energy policy in the new century, at the same time the United States is getting desperate in their effort to keep its economy going with the energy sources of the past. In terms of energy policy, the United States is at least 30 years behind Brazil. And when you take in consideration the growing demand for oil from around the world that places Brazil in a class by itself, today Brazil represents the world of tomorrow.

With oil prices on the way up and supposed to reach at least US$ 100 dollars per barrel in the near future, once again the price of oil will have a negative on the economy of most countries around the world. And Brazil will benefit, and have a major advantage when compared with the other countries, because Brazil operates on ethanol. 

Besides all that, in the last few years Brazil has found the largest new sources of oil in the world right around the Brazilian coastline, and Brazil, by developing these new sources of oil, will help in the coming years to feed the massive thirst for oil of the new global economy.

The Global Clash of Speeds

In December of 2006 I read a very interesting new book "Revolutionary Wealth" by Alvin Toffler. He said a lot of insightful things in his book and in chapter 3 "The Clash of Speeds" - he said the following: "The countries with the key economies in today's world - the United States, Japan, China, and the European Union - are all heading for a crisis that none wants, that few political leaders are ready for, and that will set limits on future economic advance. This looming crisis is a direct result of the "de-synchronization effect," an example of how we mindlessly deal with one of the deepest of all the deep fundamentals: Time.

Nations all over the world today are struggling at different rates of speed to build advanced economies. What most business, political and civil leaders have not yet clearly understood is a simple fact: An advanced economy needs an advanced society, for every economy is a product of the society in which it is embedded and is dependent on its key institutions.

If a country manages to speed up its economic advance but leaves its key institutions behind, it will eventually limit its potential to create wealth. Call it the Law of Congruence. Feudal institutions everywhere obstructed industrial advance. In the same way, today's industrial age bureaucracies are slowing the move toward a more advanced, knowledge-based system for creating wealth...In all these countries, key public institutions are out of step with the whirlwind of change that surrounds them."

Anyway, the book has 500 pages and one of the things that he mentioned in his book and I did not forget, is that the most extraordinary thing today is that we still can function at all here in the United States - he shows with many examples how everything is getting completely out of sync.

Not only here inside the US economy, but it is amazing that the US still is able to do business with countries from around the world when everybody is moving at different speeds.

By the way, one of the points that Alvin Toffler makes in his book is that the American legal system is completely out of sync with the reality of what is happening inside the United States, and around the world.

For years futurists such as Alvin Toffler and John Naisbitt have lectured the rest of us that the end of the industrial age also means the end of "mass production" and "mass labor." What they never mention is what "the masses" should do after they become redundant.

China Megatrends

I am reading the latest book by John Naisbitt - "China's Megatrends: The 8 Pillars of a New Society." And I am learning new facts about what is behind China's economic development miracle in the last 30 years. And in this book Mr. Naisbitt said: "China in 2009 is creating an entirely new social and economic system. China is creating its own new society, its own political system.

...China is like a biracial child that, after it has undergone a significant emancipation process, starts to disconnect from its parents - communism and capitalism - using the strength it gained from both sides to start walking on its own feet."

Regarding China he also said: " You cannot understand a new paradigm by using the vocabulary of the old paradigm."

Conclusion

Brazil is ready for the new economic miracle of this new century, and it is prepared to lift the Brazilian economy to new heights; to materialize and make a reality one of the great economic development stories of the 21st Century.

There is no question about it. And we have undisputable evidence in Brazil of the superb military government planning and implementation of the ethanol plan. And we should give all the credit that the military government deserves in that area for their extraordinary foresight and achievements, and the total recognition by all of us that the military government played a major role in getting Brazilian independence from foreign oil.

During the military dictatorship years they planted the economic seeds, and built the foundations of an economic system that is becoming one of the best in the world.

I would also like to suggest that all members of the economic team of the Brazilian government take the time to read the latest book by John Naisbitt - "China's Megatrends: The 8 Pillars of a New Society" - since that book gives profound insights about all the transformations that have been going on in China's economic and social systems.

His book serves as a guide and a road map to a totally new economic and social system that is still a work in progress. But so far this new system has delivered outstanding results for China and the Chinese population. And Brazil should study very carefully, and adopt the parts of this new complex system that has been so successful in lifting about 400 million people from poverty in China, and will continue lifting hundreds of millions of new people out of poverty in the coming years.

China in 2010 is creating an entirely new social and economic system model, which might also be relevant and serve as an inspiration to solve the economic and social problems in Brazil.

**********

Books mentioned on above article:

1) "It Takes a Pillage - Behind the Bailouts, Bonuses, and Backroom Deals from Washington to Wall Street" by Nomi Prins, published in October 2009 by John Wiley & Sons Inc. ISBN: 978-0-470-52959-1

2) "Revolutionary Wealth" by Alvin and Heidi Toffler, published in 2006 - ISBN: 0-375-40174-1

3) "China's Megatrends - The 8 Pillars of a New Society" by John and Doris Naisbitt, published in January 2010 - ISBN: 978-0-06-185944-1

*****

You can read other articles by Ricardo C. Amaral at:
Brazzil magazine - Columnist: Ricardo C. Amaral
http://brazzilnews.blogspot.com/

Ricardo C. Amaral is a writer and economist. He can be reached at brazilamaral@yahoo.com.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (103)Add Comment
China’s Megatrends
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 23, 2010

I want to quote some info from the latest book by John Naisbitt – China’s Megatrends.

Quoting from pg. 18 – “China has a literacy rate of 90.9 percent, life expectancy at birth is 73 years; and the per capita GDP is $5,962.

India has a literacy rate of 61 percent, life expectancy of 69 years, and per capita GDP of $2,762. (GDP’s are on a price power parity basis. Source: IMF)”

Quoting from pg. 174 – China started from a very low base and has come very far, but it still ranks quite low internationally. When its GDP is divided by its 1.3 billion population, the per capita GDP is only $3,315. This can be compared with other figures for per capita ADP, according to the IMF in 2008…India, $1,016.

.
Interesting article....
written by fried CHC, April 23, 2010


Uncle Sam..... Back of the bus you go!

Not a word from you, or you will be walking the rest of the way, questions?

Costinha
...
written by Ederson, April 23, 2010
Everyday, even in the American press, there is another disclosure concerning the general incompetence, irresponsibility, and corruption of the American government. Their socialist president is revealing himself as a breaker of promises and budgets. If their president is an indicator of the future of America as a leader, I wouldn't force them to the back of the bus, I'd kick them off.
way off!
written by james Hesson, April 23, 2010
From what I get from this story, the US is going down the drain tomorrow, and Brazil, modeling itself on the ruthless oppressive practices CHINA INC. will be next week's super power. I guess you think if people keep shouting this as much as possible, then everyone will believe it. Yet, it seems to me the emperor is wearing no clothes.
Oh, and I forgot to mention your praise for the military dictatorship. Yeah, there were those who were very pleased in Nazi Germany and fascist Italy because finally the "trains ran on time". But this seems to be overlooking the obvious glaring egregious drawback of the military dictatorship and the totalitarian regime of China: they all rely on ruthless oppression and brutality, the anathema of freedom loving people. And so interesting to hear mostly Brazilians constantly blaming their troubles on the fact that the US supported the dictatorship, yet here you want to heap praise on them. Sort of reminds me of Lula hugging and praising the brutal dictator Ahmadinejad, while on the other hand, calling for a commission to investigate the crimes of the dictators. What's good for the goose is good for the gander: call for investigations on the crimes of the Iranian dictator. But of course Lula and many of his apologist are blinded by the multi billion dollar investments Petrobras has in Iran. So, don't expect truth to win out here, only delusion and hypocrisy. Besides, it is to the credit of Brazil that like India, it has a deep appreciation for a certain degree of democratic governing, so it seems implausible that Brazilians could ever really accept CHINA INC. as a model for the good life.

I guess I could question many of your assumptions, but I chose a lesser point you make about the ethanol industry of Brazil:

In terms of energy policy, the United States is at least 30 years behind Brazil. And when you take in consideration the growing demand for oil from around the world that places Brazil in a class by itself, today Brazil represents the world of tomorrow.


From what I understand, the ethanol model of Brazil relies on exploiting the desperately poor Brazilians in the countryside who do the back breaking work of cutting sugar can for poverty level wages. Nothing particularly innovative about that model: just old school brutal exploitation of the masses of workers, much like what is going on in the miraculous China model you praise. Likewise, the Brazilian model of ethanol exploitation is nearing its limits in terms of the damage to the environment due to dumping waste by products (sillage) into the water shed of Sao Paulo State. This damage combined with other industrial carcinogens in the Santos Estuary, as well as the fact that 99% of sewage is dumped directly into the waterways of Brazil has resulted in severe environmental issues. Not to mention the additional air pollution problems of Sao Paulo. Furthermore, Brazil is notorious for inadequate infrastructure for delivering the ethanol harvest from farm to port. Despite all your criticism of the US, it has an extensive freight railroad system that helps farmers bring their products quickly to markets. The inefficient and heavy polluting diesel trucks that bring their shipments to Santos are famous for sitting in lines for days just to load up their cago. It's a highly inefficient and troubled system that seems to survive by ruthlessly exploiting poor campesinos. This is hardly a model for the world to emulate.

way way off!
written by james Hesson, April 23, 2010
You say, "today Brazil represents the world of tomorrow", but I can't help but recall that old quip of De Gaul.... "and it always will be". Certainly it always will be if it follows the agenda you are calling for here in terms of ethanol production, and emulating CHINA INC. I think the US is looking for other models that don't rely on a extensive army of desperately poor workers to exploit to further dependence on oil.

The U.S. economy is in deep trouble and dying a slow death with no hope for meaningful change in sight.

So says you! While it suits your fantasy of the Brazil as next week's superpower. While the US economy is in trouble, you would think Americans are ready to going to sit by and watch it all go down the drain? I don't think so. No hope in sight you say. After passing an impressive healthcare reform bill Obama et al. are working on financial reform. It is hard to know where it is going to end, but certainly that is good reason to believe that Obama will push hard against Wall St before the day is over. The American public at this point is not as stupid as you would cast them here. They are pissed off at Wall st, so the stage is set for what should be an interesting battle. Certainly, Wall st executives will grumble, but most now understand that it is the unproportionally large financial sector that got us into trouble with their risky short term gambling. The lines are being drawn in the sand. Why do you think Americans are going to just casually sink into oblivion is beyond me. Certainly many of us will be pushing for serious reform and limitations on the banks. So while the economy is in trouble, it is not a foregone conclusion that the US is heading for the catastrophic ruination as you suggest, or should I say fantasize.

Your representation of China, the US, the dictatorship, and Brazil seems to suffer from the melodromatic and black-and-white reductionistic stereotyping common to Brazilian TV novelas and much of Brazilian culture in general.

Yawn! Wake me up when Brazil is the next superpower. In the meantime, why don't they deal with rampant corruption, crime, pollution, bureaucracy, graft, deteriorating infrastructure, extensive inequality of wealth and grinding poverty and hunger, as well as a feeble public school system.

When referring to the US economy you say "we" are in trouble. Are you American? I doubt it. I suspect you are living in the US and yet really despise America, and look for Brazil to dethrone the US. I wish healthy development and prosperity to the poor in Brazil and elsewhere in the world, but I don't see their salvation in CHINA INC, nor in the corrupt and bureaurcratic practices of Brazil. For all the problems in the US, (and I am highly critical of unfair and greedy practices of US companies and politicians), I still love the US immensely. I never spoke so lovingly of the US until I lived in Brazil and realized what a great country "we" have and how many Brazilians despise the US, mostly out of simple human envy. Unlike you, I don't revel in its demise, because despite all its contradictions, it remains one of the more dynamic forces in the world defending, providing one of the more inclusive models of development and justice. I feel sorry for you if you live in the US and resent it so much. But all the nasty angry vicious attacks people love to display against the US on this site, don't make any real positive contribution to a better world. Rather than motivated by fighting for something positive as the US revolution was about. They resemble more the hateful sentiments of the Russian Revolution, the French Revolution, or Mao's China, Fidel's Cuba: fueled by hatred and anger, more about tearing things down, not building something positive. Sadly, the green-eyed monster of envy is at work in this article. Try dreaming of a model based on the mutual development of the US and the rest of the world's economies, rather than simply celebrating the rise of Brazil and the fall of the US. It's a far more generous and positive vision than you present here.
way way way off!
written by james Hesson, April 23, 2010

"no hope in sight...Americans learned nothing from the oil shock of the 1970s....American economic and financial system is in shambles, and it does not have a prayer to get better any time soon...the US economic and financial system is doomed, and incapable of meaningful change...The U.S. economy is in deep trouble and dying a slow death with no hope for meaningful change in sight"

Yeah, I suppose if you were around during the Great Depression you would be one of those eager to lift the coffin to the grave, while predicting the future demise of the US. Yet, 15 years later the US was perched as the strongest economy in the world. Not that I am harkening back as if this was the "good ole' days" but my point is, many of us are eager for progressive change in the US. The passage of healthcare reform should show how things change: 15 years ago, it was considered unachievable. The US has learned far more than you concede about oil dependence. Just look into the research devoted toward alternative energy and efficiency in the US and it doesn't rely on the masses of poor cane cutters that ethanol relies on. Everything I have read about the ethanol farming model in Brazil is that it is bringing the environment in the areas where it is cultivated near the brink of environmental collapse. You won't hear this from the jingoistic boasting of Lula or the powerful ethanol lobby of Brazil, but read the research of Brazilian environmental researchers in regards to environmental impact, and you will see this is not model to emulate. Ethanol and other similar products would require such vast tracts of land to ever replace the global demand for oil. It cannot be the sole source of alternative energies: not without extensive environmental impact and damage.
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 23, 2010

Everyday, even in the American press, there is another disclosure concerning the general incompetence, irresponsibility, and corruption of the American government.


Are the American peasants protesting in public? Worth researching.
risible ranting
written by james Hesson, April 23, 2010
"no hope in sight...Americans learned nothing from the oil shock of the 1970s....American economic and financial system is in shambles, and it does not have a prayer to get better any time soon...the US economic and financial system is doomed, and incapable of meaningful change...The U.S. economy is in deep trouble and dying a slow death with no hope for meaningful change in sight"


Lots of unqualified absolutist hyperbolic ranting. Try a more qualified perspective and you might sound you are writing a more credible journalistic opinion piece, and not just the typical story here that claims all things Brazilian are extraordinary. This site resembles a non-stop 24- infomerical with one simplistic breathless hyperbolic melodramatic message: Brazil = paradise and all things spectacular! The US = evil and stupidity! Children like such simple minded stories of good guys and bad guys, but life is more complex. Why don't they get George Foreman or Xuxa on this blog to hawk this sensationalistic blog! Such unqualified sensational statements and simplistic characterizations make for good informericals, tabloids, political speeches, demonizing diatribes, and children's fairy tales, but despite your quotes of reputable sources, these general comments are not impressive as even-handed, measured, cautious, well-researched, and qualified journalism or scholarly research.

Fortunately, I believe there are very positive and productive forces at work in Brazil, the US, and elsewhere in the world, but the perspective represented here is not part of that. This is too much us against them, and it lead to no goodwill between our nations. Obama and company are going in a different direction than Bush and friends. I would rather dream of a world where the US and Brazil work together on projects that are in our mutual interest, but I get no such hope when I read this kind of message and the other sentiments at this blog. Despite our economic floundering, the US is not disappearing as a super power anytime soon. It seems rather than gloat about the good times in Brazil and the demise of the US, you would do better to make real and meaningful alliances towards peace, and prosperity among the fraternity of our nations.
...
written by Ederson, April 23, 2010
Joao, I don't believe the peasants in America have protests. They have what is called, "a rally."smilies/wink.gif
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 23, 2010

Joao, I don't believe the peasants in America have protests. They have what is called, "a rally."


Obrigado, Ederson. So their peasants are rallying around their President like our MST is doing with ours? smilies/shocked.gif
off your noodle
written by james Hesson, April 23, 2010
Ederson: Do you get your news on Obama from Fox "news". Obama is a socialist? Ha-haaa! That kind of right-wing Republican trash talk even affects Brazilians? Pathethtic silly talk! Do your homework and read the news before you talk. He's a moderate leftist, often in the middle of the road, and not an ideologue, and very much a free-market advocate. I personally wish he was more of a socialist, but all these accusations are absurd! The Republicans are trying to exploit fears of him, some wackos claiming he was not born in the US; he is a radical muslim bent on destroying the US; a rabid socialist, etc. Make up your mind: Brazilians want to paint Americans as flag waving right wing morons, and now accuse Obama of being an incompetent socialist. Republicans, not having much of a game plan to discredit him after losing the election, and pissing away budget surplus, spending trillions on a dumb war, and tax breaks to the rich, turn around and slander the Democrats and Obama as a reckless socialist who is squandering away money on the poor. Don't believe the hype. The Republicans got us in this mess, and Democrats will get us out.
...
written by james Hesson, April 23, 2010
Uncle Sam..... Back of the bus you go!

Not a word from you, or you will be walking the rest of the way, questions?

Costinha


Are these adolescent put downs the best you can do? Try an articulate essay making some insightful points.
I wonder...
written by VinnyCarioca, April 23, 2010
what the Brazilian, or Chinese, economy would look like today if American taxpayers did not bail out the global financial system?

Stay tuned...the future of the European Union is looking very interesting these days.
Say what?
written by Simpleton, April 23, 2010
jH, please don't call our dear Costinha an a*****escent pta you can do. Try as we might we've never been able to get a compromisso on the price for articulating it's asshey and making our fine points go inside.
James Hesson
written by Ederson, April 23, 2010
Sorry, James. I did not know that to call someone a "socialist" was a bad thing. I understand from you that I should refer to him as a moderate leftist? Isn't that akin to having your fifteen-year-old daughter explain that you shouldn't worry because she is only a little bit pregnant?
The American political system is very dynamic and interesting. You have moderates, right wingers, and leftists, and now, apparently, you have moderate leftists, which confuses me even more. How far do you have to go before you can be labeled a left-to-the-moderate leftist?smilies/cheesy.gif
..............................................................
written by fried CHC, April 23, 2010


Jamie…. May I call you Jamie?


OK Jamie…. You are easier then choosing:

Press-1 for broccoli
Press-2 for chocolate mouse

Now then, did you find your pillow this morning after having the dream of eating 10 pounds of marshmallow last night?


My advise to you: Go brake another wishbone and see if your luck changes!

Uncle Sam, on second thought, I think I will tie you on the back bumper of the bus, or do you prefer walking the rest of the way? Happy calluses!

Hehehe

Costinha
...
written by JH, April 23, 2010
Ederson: it sounds like here you are saying it is not a bad thing for him to be a socialist, but everything in the tone of your message seems to indicate that you think he is both incompetent and somehow this is related to his supposed socialist beliefs. This is similar to the nonsense you hear regularly on Fox News. And the "back of the bus" image is insensitive and racist, making light of an ignominous moment in history by directing the first American black president to go to the back of the bus.
Their socialist president is revealing himself as a breaker of promises and budgets. If their president is an indicator of the future of America as a leader, I wouldn't force them to the back of the bus, I'd kick them off.
...
written by JH, April 23, 2010
Ederson: I guess you misunderstand me. No, it is not at all a bad if he were a socialist. No, in my opionion, that could be good. Yet, you seemed to be putting him down.

What is so puzzling about the US political spectrum? Isn't it similar in Brazil?

You have moderates, right wingers, and leftists, and now, apparently, you have moderate leftists, which confuses me even more. How far do you have to go before you can be labeled a left-to-the-moderate leftist?
...
written by Ederson, April 23, 2010
Sorry, again, JH. I wasn't the one who would send him to the back of the bus; that was Fried CHC, on the blog before me. I stated that I would kick him off altogether, as I would anyone who accepted a bribe of a million dollars during a campaign from a financier such as G. Sachs, especially one who so openly spoke of a higher mission for America during his campaign and who promised previously not to accept private money. Do Americans believe that their politicians are not frequent liars?
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 23, 2010

Sorry, Ederson. You are losing focus, by interfering in the internal affairs of the U.S. and not pursuing our interests. Both James and young Vinny have made some good points about the Chinese and somehow you missed their message, which is unusual on your part.

Vinny brought up an interesting comment about the EU, in line with our mutual thoughts. Knowing Vinny, I bet he is challenging the leadership of Napolião. Jr in "Old Europe". If so, I side with him. I suggest you do too.smilies/wink.gif
Joao!
written by Ederson, April 23, 2010
I've been apologizing to everyone all day about something. Yes, I've gotten a little sidetracked. I really don't care that much about American politics.smilies/cheesy.gif Just trying to be polite.
Joao
written by VinnyCarioca, April 23, 2010
Knowing Vinny, I bet he is challenging the leadership of Napolião. Jr in "Old Europe". If so, I side with him.


Joao, if you continue to deal up the "Old Europe" card, you will certainly draw the ire of the erudite James "I personally wish he was more of a socialist" Hesson.
I like this Hesson gent. Speaks like a great American patriot and, at the same time, like one of the well intentioned socialists I enjoy and look forward to debating during my annual visit to the extended family in Brasil.
I am trying to hone my "Joao da Silva subtle baiting skills"....how did I do this time around my good fellow?


Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 24, 2010

Ricardo: To answer your question: Yes, I live in the United States – I am aboard the “Titanic” and the ship is sinking faster than most people realize.

I will make some other postings to bring up some other important points for you to see how the US economy is in terrible shape, and on almost on intensive care – if you take away the massive US government intervention in the US economy, then you have nothing left.

Here is summary of what makes the core and the strength of the U.S. economy:

The financial mess of the economies of states such as California, New York State, New Jersey, Illinois, Michigan represents the sad shape of the US economy, and these states are relevant in relation to the size of the economy of the United State of America and the US dollar. The economy of these states is the best the US has to offer.

If California were an independent country its economy would be the 7th largest economy in the world. And California is responsible for 13 percent of the United States Gross Domestic Product (GDP).

California is the largest state economy in the U.S. and the second largest is New York, which is about 70 percent the size of California's.

If you combine the economies of California, New York and New Jersey (the core of the US economy) they represent over 25 percent of the total US economy. Then you add on top of that the economies of Illinois, Michigan the result is a “Pathetic Basket Case”.

In a Nutshell: The United States should be thankful that we still have so many suckers and fools around the world. Americans still are able to project the idea around the world of the US dollar as a “safe haven” currency, but in reality today the US dollar is as safe as traveling in the “Titanic.”

China's central bank said that its reserves of foreign currency, by far the world's largest, rose to $2.4 trillion at the end of December 2009.

Just a reminder: about 71% of China’s total foreign reserves are in US Dollars or an estimated $ 1.7 trillion US dollars - in cash, bonds, and treasuries.


*****


Here is another major basket case:

March 16, 2010

Governor Christie presented his plan for closing a state budget deficit estimated to be $11 billion for next fiscal year.

The State now faces a staggering $10.7 billion budget gap that has been years in the making. It is the direct result of rising, unchecked spending at both the State and local levels. The State Budget was $21.8 billion in fiscal 2001. Spending surged 59% to a record $34.6 billion in fiscal 2008. Last year, the Budget was $31.3 billion counting federal stimulus money, until Governor Christie was forced to reduce spending as revenue failed to meet overly optimistic projections.

In 2009 the NJ state budget was $31.3 billion dollars and Governor Chris Christie is cutting $ 11 billion reducing the NJ state budget for 2010 to $20.3 billion dollars.

When you reduce the state budget by $ 11 billion – more than 1/3 of the total budget, then you can expect an imploding state economy. With the multiplier effect the implosion is even bigger.

New Jersey's debt ballooned from $16 billion in 2001 to nearly $52 billion in 2009.

Source: 2011 Budget Brief
FISCAL YEAR 2011 BUDGET OF CHRIS CHRISTIE, GOVERNOR OF NEW JERSEY, TRANSMITTED TO THE FIRST ANNUAL SESSION OF THE TWO HUNDRED FOURTEENTH LEGISLATURE


*****


April 18, 2010

Conclusion: The Governor of New Jersey – Chris Christie – is working very hard to turn New Jersey into a Banana Republic.

Yesterday I went to one of the public libraries in North Jersey and the librarian was passing information to everybody who uses that library. He was asking people to write to Governor Christie and ask him not to cut the Library funding in Northern New Jersey by 74 percent starting in July 1, 2010.

He also told me that the interlibrary delivery system will be eliminated, and all kinds of library programs also will be eliminated. He is cutting the state library funding to the bone, which will result in drastic service cuts by the library, reduced hours the libraries will be open to the public, massive reduction in staff, and a number of libraries will be closed in Northern New Jersey.

The librarian also told me that his library never been so busy as in the last 2 years, and since the current recession started a few years back – the libraries in the area had been one of the most popular places for people – young and senior citizens - to spend their time, and at the same time keep the kids out of trouble.

It is obvious that the recently elected Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey (elected in November 2009) is a first class: MORON

.
rebuttal
written by tom nyc , April 24, 2010
When i dont have to pay of a brazilian cop for NOT running a red light (he was behind me & didn't want to wait -no emergency involved) then brazil MIGHT make it! When 6 of 10 of my friends @ diner tell me that they have been beaten by the police for no reason, this is not a first wold nation! When ive had to pay kickbacks to the port oficials customs agents, police, phone, company etc. that is not a first world country! So please stop congratulating yourselves you ain't all that. And after the fascist imbeciles who are the demdratic party get defeated this november. The economic picture will immediately begin to change just like it did after carter and clinton
Reposta Boa
written by Simpleton, April 24, 2010
Ricardo, I (and I asssume others) thank you for your above reply to Hesson. Very interesting information indeed (and not one word on your hereditarial connections).

If I'm seeing things right and the info you provided is accurate the Chinese have a 1.7 trillion stake in what's supposed to be mine, my family's and my future decendent's should there be any. That stake is going to pay them interest that is above the historical average inflation rate. Over time something must necessarily give to sustain it and it won't be via defaulting. Higher taxes or the devaluation of the dollar is inevitable. Either way the inflation effects locally must rise above the curve at some point most likely when I can no longer try to overcome it or stay at least even with it by pressing for higher pay, switching upward in jobs, coupon clipping, etc.. Then there's this socialist crapola. I guess there's a chance that could work in my favor and assist with covering my healthcare post retirement but I really really doubt it. One way or another I will be forced to cover the costs and they will most certainly be driven higher by addition of governmental administration cost factors / those on the take if it's contracted out (which undoubtedly it will be). The best I can hope for is to place stock pony bets on who is going to get that contract and catch a ride on another bubble which will once again burst.

Advice: Little by little, as much as you can, stuff cash under your matress. Cash is going to be king once again in the not so distant future similar to the beginning parts of the past decade. With any luck I will double my paper worth again in short order and capitulate sooner so I don't end up giving 30-40 percent of it back and have to wait a couple of years to recover that. Little waves I don't mind but the tsunami is a coming - count on it.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 24, 2010

Ricardo: The United States will need to shrink its defense spending very drastically in the near future because of a reality check: the baby boomers are going to explode the federal government budget in the United States – every year from now on the US will need to carry an extra 3 million senior citizens on its payroll – Social Security, Medicare, Pensions and so on.

The portion of the US population age 65 and above is finally exploding (thanks to the baby boomer generation) and going from about 40 million people to about 74 million in a very short period of time – that never happened before in the history of the United States – the old buggers keep living longer and longer with drastic consequences to the US economy.

To make things worse the most expensive group of retirees are about to explode – the category they call old-old the people age 85 and older – and that group is going to cripple the future budgets of the US government.

The current accumulative debt of the US government is approaching $ 13 trillion US dollars, and they estimate that the cost related to the baby boom generation to be at least another $ 70 trillion US dollars. (This is the conservative estimate, and the more aggressive estimates bring that number to around $ 100 trillion US dollars.)

And don’t forget the idea of a United States country that most people have around the world – it does not exist anymore, since the economic system of that country had a quick demise in the summer of 2008. And just God knows what kind of economic system the United States has adopted since that time, government intervention can give us a temporary illusion that things are getting better, but at the end of the day the US economy is imploding and becoming obsolete by world standards at the speed of light.

The symbols of American economic superiority are collapsing one after another: GM and Chrysler, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, Citigroup, Merrill Lynch, and now the ultimate champion of Wall Street “Goldman Sachs”. (Very quickly the entire world is finding out that "Goldman Sachs" is nothing more than a "Bernie Madoff" in steroids).

.
Dumb Brazilian
written by Luigi Vercotti, April 24, 2010
This week's blathering from the little prince. After spending 3 years in Brazil (I'm a Brazilian citizen) I'm back in the US. What a relief to be back in the frsit world. Hey Ricardo, I'll let America know it's collapsing, they haven't seemed to notice.

Thw DOW is at 11000+ in case you haven't heard that on PBS. GM paid back it gov't loan. (Too bad Lula let Varig go under and screw all the employees). There is construction everywhere. My clients' are all doing great business. Goldman Sachs is anything but a Madoff scheme, they're getting grief because they MADE money during the recession.

Madoff is in jail for the rest of his life. How many crooked Brazilians, white collar, end up in jail? None.

You pathetic little Brazilians love it when the US is passing through the natural economic down cycles (dumbass!) and you get to talk about the end of the US. We American, those of us who even notice you peons, laugh at Brazil and piss on you.

Keep telling yourselves Brazil is a powerhouse. You are a comedy only taken seriously by yourselves. Now I have to get my BMW washed.

Have a good weekend, hope you don't get robbed.
VinnyCarioca
written by João da Silva, April 24, 2010

I am trying to hone my "Joao da Silva subtle baiting skills"....how did I do this time around my good fellow?


Your baiting skills surpassed that of mine a long time ago, my dear fellow.smilies/cheesy.gif

I enjoy and look forward to debating during my annual visit to the extended family in Brasil.


Please make sure to get the opinion of your father-in-law on the articles written by Ricardo and the views expressed by James.smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
Ederson
written by João da Silva, April 24, 2010

I've been apologizing to everyone all day about something.


I hope you were not apologizing for being a Brasilan.smilies/smiley.gif

I can sense that our esteemed friend Dr.Cata is lurching in the shadows waiting to pounce at the right moment to comment on this article. We will leave it into his capable hands to defend his country´s honor. In the meantime, we will continue working to clean up the mess at home.smilies/wink.gif
More Amaral BS
written by Luigi Vercotti, April 24, 2010
Ricardo, you get laid much, or spend all your time collecting nonsense to support your lame opinions? Did I read you live in the States? Why?
Be a good beaner and go back to Brazil, you'll have much more to write about.

Since I was a kid in Brazil in the late 70's (during the dictatorship you guys seem to miss so much) I have read and listened to you lefty Brazilian dorks point out the demise of the US, for any convenient reason you could find. Hey, 40 years later, the US is still going strong.

This Obama abortion is just another Carter/Clinton phase, which, like herpes, recurs periodically. It'll be over soon, beginning with the dems losing the majorities this Nov, then with a ballsy white republican taking two terms in the White House.

You are an over-educated under occupied foreign leftist throwing rocks at the US, a Monday morning quaterback. Go watch Fronline and shut the F up.




Talking about Foresight...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 24, 2010

Ricardo: Mr. Luigi Vercotti, when you call me a Monday Morning Quaterback on your posting – you made me laugh so hard I fell out my chair rolling on the floor laughing my ass off.

Many times over the years I came across people like you at the ET forum, and over the years I have been right so many times about what I said about the future that most of them don’t challenge me anymore.

Yesterday, I posted the following on the ET Forum and the same logic applies to you.

Please I challenge you to post some more of your ranting here on the comments section of this article, and we will compare notes in a few years, and see who was right.


*****


April 23, 2010

SouthAmerica: Reply to Kiwi Trader

We are talking about countries here, and not quarterly earnings of some company.

I am adding a copy of my article to the ET Forum, to give you guys a chance to look back in the future to this article when you need an actual example of what the word foresight means.

But in ten years read the enclosed article, and I bet you will be shocked on how accurate this article is going to turn out to be.

You can bet on that!!!!


********


Then I posted at the ET forum a copy of the above article: “Brazil and the New Economic Miracle. The U.S. Has a Lot to Learn!” - Written by Ricardo C. Amaral - Brazzil magazine – April 23, 2010


********


April 23, 2010

SouthAmerica: Reply to Kiwi Trader

People like you also criticized my article in February 2005, and they thought I was an idiot, alarmist, a fool, and worse.

In February 2005 the comments after the article said:

1) Interesting fantasy!
An unlikely extrapolation, based on facts selected to bolster the author's viewpoint.

2) Fantasy Indeed!
This author has an extremely active imagination.

3) Interesting fiction here. Demonstrates how easily a journalist can create deception merely by inserting and omitting facts as he pleases.

4) Fiction/ potential fact
I'm sorry to say that some of the authors facts are correct.


In June 2006 the comments after the article said:

1) 1 year later...
USA is still in Iraq, wasting money, and actively spreading the bad reputation.


In February 2008 the comments after the article said:

1) Amazing accuracy

I was just going through websites trying to see when people predicted the next Depression. Whether in 2008 or 2009. I came across a forum where your screen name was "SOUTH AMERICA." I just now read this and WOW. I can totally see all of that happening and am already seeing it happen with my own eyes and ears. Particularly this part :

"To compound the US economic problems, US corporations started repudiating the benefit payments of their pension and health plans. Everybody wanted to pass their pension responsibility to the US government - the trend started with the steel industry, then the airline industry, the major auto manufacturers, and after that, every company with a substantial pension plan. The US government had no choice other than to swallow approximately US$ 600 billion in new pension liabilities."

Everyone is looking to each other to bail the other one out. I just heard that the auto company CHRYSLER is going overseas to China, and we have outsourced thousands if not millions of jobs to China, India, and other low wage paying countries. I think the only thing that hasn't come to pass yet in this article is the attacks on American soil. And the American soldiers being target practice for the Iraqi Insurgency. I'm pretty sure that will happen though. Especially if we have either Hilary Clinton or John McCain (both war mongers) as a president. I think you hit everything right on. It's amazing to see those first couple of comments from 2005 saying that your facts were way off or it was just a fantasy. Now we're here in 2008 and it's all unfolding just as you say!


In September 2008 the comments after the article said:

What would you do now, since your predictions here have come to fruition, and NO ONE KNOWS WHAT TO DO OR BELIEVE.! I found you on Charlie Rose' site. Hope you stay informative there. Thank you!


*****

Conclusion:

By the fall of 2008 the people who were reading that article thought that I was the reincarnation of Nostradamus.


*****


Brazzil Magazine - February 2005
"It’s 2008. The US Has Dragged the World into a Depression."
Written by Ricardo C. Amaral
http://www.brazzilmag.com/comp...ssion.html


***

And here we go again, Kiwi Trader – please post some more comments on this thread then in few years we can look back, and have a few laughs about your comments.


***

And we will also be able to laugh about the comments made by: Luigi Vercotti.
.
Holy Molly… Proud Papa is Back!
written by fried CHC, April 25, 2010


Listen here Luigi Vercotti - A$$HOLE O MIO…

If anyone in your family grows beyond 5'2'', your mama have had an affair.

How do you brainwash an Italian? Give him an enema!

Hehehe

Costinha
de ja vue
written by mark s, April 25, 2010
When I lived in zona sul of Rio I thought Brazil wasn,t too bad since I was isolated from REAL Brazil. Once I moved I got a real taste of you amazing country. You might have internet connections and ATMs. This things can be developed in weeks. On other hand things that make a difference and take decades to develop such as health and educational systems, public safety and transportation infrastructure I would put Brazil one hundred years behind the US and Europe. Same commie propaganda I read here and watch on Globo,s government sponsored advertisement I heard in the 70s in Eastern Europe. Ten years later they were on their backs with all fours sticking straight up in the air.
...
written by JH, April 25, 2010
Ricardo: You site a slew of statistics as a rebuttal to my response to your article, but you are still way off the mark. First, your title is about the ethanol industry in Brazil and how the US has "lots to learn!". You may have a Phd in economics, and if you were to right your area of study I would listen attentively, assuming you did your homework and that I had something to possibly learn from your expertise. But why on earth are you making such sensational claims about an area you seem to have little expertise in? You don't quote research about the industry, the environmental impact or any other feature of the industry, but simply praise the dictatorship for initiating the industry. So your general assumptions are true, but if you were to look at the way in which ethanol is produced in Brazil, your claims are specious at best. Brazilian researchers have documented the environmental impact of immense nitrogen release from ethanol silage combined with immense load of untreated sewage (99%) dumped into the Sao Paulo water shed, and you have an economic practice that has substantial damage to the waterways and reservoirs of Sao Paulo state. I am no expert in this area, but I have read enough to know that this model should be seriously questioned. More importantly, I know the limits of my knowledge so I would never care to write an article about an area where I have little expertise and knowledge. You seem to have little reservation about overextending yourself, and making sensational pronouncements about an area that you have not apparently studied well. The same can be said about your assumption about how the US energy sector has a lot to learn from Brazil. What do you really know about biofuel research in the US???? Just do take a minute to do a google search. Without much effort you should find major research institutions such as the National Corn to ethanol research center (http://www.ethanolresearch.com/). This is not even my area of interest, but I also know of a major centers such as Amyris Biotechnologies in Emeryville CA, associated with Berkeley, dedicated to biofuels, as well as labs in the University of California at Davis, and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory. I am sure there are more knowledgeable researchers out there who could tell you about an extensive network of research centers across the US doing such research. So before you make such bold and exaggerated pronouncements, please do your homework since it seems it that it is not the US that has "LOTS TO LEARN!" from Brazil, but rather, YOU in fact are the one who has lots more to learn about your subject before you make such bold claims. Please do your homework before you make such wild claims, and consider taking a class in journalism 101 where you can learn about the basics of fact checking, and cautious qualified claims, especially about a topic you don't know about.

...
written by JH, April 25, 2010
Next, while you at least cite some specific data on the US economy, I interpret the data far differently. You conclude that the end is near for the US, nothing but doom and gloom, fated to cataclysmic ruination:

"no hope in sight...Americans learned nothing from the oil shock of the 1970s....American economic and financial system is in shambles, and it does not have a prayer to get better any time soon...the US economic and financial system is doomed, and incapable of meaningful change...The U.S. economy is in deep trouble and dying a slow death with no hope for meaningful change in sight"


Well, I agree we have serious problems, but I prefer the perspective of Nobel prize winning economists like Paul Krugman of the New York Times who see danger and peril in our current situation, but also the possibility of reforming, regrouping, and reinventing our economy and finding a new fruitful direction, if the right choices are made.

The more specific examples you give are just one more area where I come to different conclusions. You say the Republican governor is leading the state of New Jersey to becoming a bannana republic, and you give the library cutbacks as an example. Well, this is not the sole invention of the NJ governor: in fact, California made such cuts over a year ago. The local libraries have cut interlibrary loans, and reduced their hours. Well, that is a sad casualty of the recession, but it doesn't amount to apocalyptic ruin you invoke. So the library is open only in the mornings or two days less a week, but believe me, you adjust to this. For interlibrary loans, find a university library with a generous patron policy or library in a nearby wealthy community that is continuing to fund such services. They typically extend patron services to anyone, whether you are from the town or not. In contrast, to such inconveniences, I remember wanting to go to public libraries in Brazil and my wife told me there are very few of them, and in the few places where they do exist, the books are antiquated and not worth the trouble. When I talked of interlibrary loans or books on tape, people were surprised to know that most American libraries and any old working class town would offer such services. I often relied on FNAC ( a French chain) as a high quality bookstore as well as ordering books from Amazon.
So again, even in this recession, this just one small example where I find the quality of life in the US still far better than what was available for my family and I in Brazil. So why all the gloating about the sinking of the Titanic and the rising of next weeks' superpower, Brazil?
...
written by JH, April 25, 2010
You mention the debt of California, but you along with this gloomy picture, I still see the Silicon Valley, Google, Apple, Genentech, Applied Bio Systems, and various other biotech businesses here continuing to thrive, even if they have not much new hiring due to the recession. California's economy is vast as you said. By itself it would surpass the GDP of many countries. It is having serious fiscal problems, but its impressive hi-tech industry as well as agricultural and basic industry sector are not going to disappear soon. Like much of the US, I believe many services will be reduced, but as the economy bounces back, these services can be augmented.
You mention the collapse of certain iconic institutions like Goldman-Sachs. But is this so bad? As Paul Krugman points out, the financial sector is bloated and contributing little in terms of real production. We are learning now about the complexities of the fraud they dealt in. Rather than assuming the US will end in ruination, I hope for good things to come of the financial reforms that are in front of Congress now. Hopefully, the US will economy will and many Americans will tighten their belts, but come out of these lean years with a new and more profitable and sensible direction such as investing highly in science, alternative energy, biotech, biofuels, nano-tech, nano-ristors, etc. The US still maintains vast and extensive capacity in these areas. The housing bubble created by Wall St. is something to learn from, not an indicator or our absolute inevitable ruination.

The issue of the costly baby boomer retirement is certainly a serious issue, but not something doomed to bankrupt the country. Obama et al. are just beginning to make inroads into cutting medical costs. This will be the crux of the battle to avoid bankruptcy in my opinion. The pharmaceutical companies, hospitals, doctors and insurance companies may need to compromise on their fees and profits, but bankruptcy is not inevitable.
I do agree however that the bloated military budget may be a source for avoiding further cuts in education, libraries, infrastructure, and other social services. So far, social services are being cut, but not the military budget remains the holy cow, only growing further. Obama is going in the right direction calling for dismantling nuclear warheads which are essentially and obsolete war strategy.

Now excuse, me while you all continue ranting about the inevitable ruination of the US, I am going down to the beach with my family. :- )
...
written by JH, April 26, 2010
And Simpleton: from your posts, I gather you readily earned that name. If you are an aspiring economist like Ricardo, I can only say, don't you give up your day job.

Stuff cash under your mattress? Yeah, will do!

And you say:
Ricardo, I (and I asssume others) thank you for your above reply to Hesson. Very interesting information indeed (and not one word on your hereditarial connections).


Hereditarial connection??? So what does that have to do with the price of tea in China? or the issue of ethanol production and oil dependence? From what I can see from Ricardo's blog, he had a distant relative who was one of the founding father's of Brazil. Is this supposed to impress me? Or make me respect his opinion or poorly written essay? It doesn't change anything for me: he quotes little relevant literature on ethanol production, and he wanders from this specific topic to make sensational specious claims in support of the dictatorship, endorses the totalitarian model of development of CHINA INC, and predicts the sinking of the US like the Titanic. If I wanted sensationalism, I would read the National Inquirer, at least their stories about Elvis being seen in the mall or the birth of wolf children is much more amusing than this chatter.

Simpleton, I know Brazilians are inclined to revere and respect titles and aristocratic lineage, so maybe this is why you mention his "herediterial" lineage. But, I am American and those things don't sway my opinion about whether this article is well written or not. We don't care much about aristocratic lineage. I wouldn't care if he was the son of George Washington; it wouldn't make his ideas and conclusions any more acceptable to me.

Ricardo, you rather than citing pop economist like Alvin Toefler, you would be far more impressive if you cited some specialized journals from the literature either about the US production of bio fuels or social and environmental impact of ethanol production of Brazil: the real story is far more nuanced than you present here, and it would not fit with your simplistic characterization of either country.
And with a history like that Americans still have the nerve of criticizing Tiananmen Square in China
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 26, 2010

Ricardo: This is a thread about my article and following comments that is happening at the ET forum as follows:

You guys, and mainly the regular readers of Brazzil magazine from China are going to enjoy reading all the comments about US government actions posted at:

“Brazil and the New Economic Miracle. The U.S. Has a Lot to Learn!”
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...genumber=9

…Anyway, here is a reality check regarding recent US history.

And with a history like that the US mainstream media still has the nerve of criticizing Tiananmen Square in China.

.
the sky is falling
written by JH, April 26, 2010
By the fall of 2008 the people who were reading that article thought that I was the reincarnation of Nostradamus.


So that is your final reply: you are the reincarnation of Nostradamus? This is precious stuff. I don't know if you can get a job as an economist, but certainly you've got a good chance at getting a job at the World Weekly News as a mystical prognosticator. Yeah, this is right up there with bat children or the face of Elvis on the moon. Do these predictions come to you in dreams? You might even want to consider offering your service to world leaders. Maybe you could offer to read Lula's palm? Nostradamus they call you? I'd prefer to call you Chicken Little, after the fairy tale character who ran around shouting desperately, "the sky is falling, the sky is falling, the sky is falling!" But your line is the Titanic is sinking! The Titanic is sinking!!! Or maybe as Chicken Little you would shout, "Brazil is rising, Brazil is rising!!!". Before you get so worked up about them reducing the hours of your library and the inevitable transformation of New Jersey into a "banana republic". Take a few deep breaths, try a decaf, and consider some of the actions the US is taking to fight the recession, as well as some other possible outcomes that while fairly negative, are not the melodramatic total apocalyptic ruination that you predict for the US.
While I have a certain respect for spiritism and voodoo as practiced by certain people in Brazil, as it helps them deal with the sufferings life presents, I don't think much of voodoo mystic economists. I have read other people on this site making strange predictions that will happen on specific days, and I have heard crazy conspiracy theories involving images in US currency and plots related to the World Trade Tower attack, and again, I say this all makes for magical realism, but not good economic and political theory or research. I just want to know, where is the beef? where are the facts? I have no interest in mystics.

Now, this is not to say that economist who follow certain trends, cannot make long term predictions, including predicting the collapse of the housing bubble, and the recession that followed. I was in Brazil in Oct. 2006, and an economist from USP confided in me that the housing market was seemingly going to collapse. Well, he got this info from friends he knew on Wall St, and there was nothing spectacular about such a prediction. In fact, many were predicting that the bubble would burst. Yet I wouldn't give them any special credit for predicting this since the indicators of this were obvious. Rather than credit you or anyone else with mystical powers of prediction, I would seriously fault the regulators and others who were blind to the obvious. This is function of ideology and unwavering faith in the market's ability to self-correct. Bush appointed a meager staff of 25 people to monitor and regulate all the major global banks involved in the derivatives fraud. Beginning with the deregulation of the Glass-Stegall Act, this erosion of regulation allowed for the proliferation of fraud and plundering perpetrated by Wall St. From what I understand, and I am not an economist, there were many who were alarmed about the dangerous lack of regulation and policing of the sub-prime loans and other "liar's" loans given freely. In retrospect we are seeing a kind of hubris in the ideology of the free market advocates who have institutionalized and legitimized practices that are in fact fraud. As others have said here, your reading is a bit of Monday quarterbacking. The only people who could have been making such predictions would be those who knew of the back room machinations where firms like Goldman knew the loans they were packaging were bad, yet they sold them intentionally knowing this, and then bet against them. Unless you were privy to such information, you like most of us, were not aware of the depths of the crisis. In fact, it is just coming to the surface as the SEC investigates further. So, if you made some general prediction like many that there was an overextended housing bubble, you are not alone, but you sound like a bit of a megalomaniac, however, to claim some kind of mystical Nostradamus predictive power. Unlike some Brazilians, I am not interested in mystics, but rather good political and economic analysis, grounded in cautious, qualified measured evaluation of the evidence, and not the sensational claims you toss about here.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 26, 2010

Ricardo: I said on my article: “A Legacy of the Military Government in Brazil: Ethanol” - And “During the oil shock of the 1970's Brazil imported from foreign sources about 90 percent of its oil needs in Brazil, and in 2010 Brazil is an oil exporting country.”

In a nutshell: “The generals and their dictatorship system put in place the foundations that made Brazil use home-grown sugar cane as a source of energy independence….Brazilian Independence from Foreign Oil.

… the United States economy becomes more risky with every passing day when you consider that the United States is so dependent on "foreign oil." And the oil that the US needs to fuel its economy comes from places that are swamped with geopolitical trouble as in the areas of major civil wars such as in Iraq (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Qatar, Oman, UAE, and Iran) and in Nigeria, and so on.

And today the United States can't guarantee to keep its future supply of oil coming even from next door in Venezuela, since China slowly is taking away from the United States that source of energy.”


*****

Ricardo: my article is about how Brazil got their independence from foreign oil since the 1970’s, and how the United States is in very deep trouble in that area.

We had many discussions about ethanol on the ET economics forum and you can read it at the following links:

The Sustainable Development Forum 2007 - Ethanol and Biofuels
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...adid=93388


http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...genumber=3


*****


I also posted the following on the ET economics forum in 2006:

Bill Gates and ethanol
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...ost1113467

… May 9, 2006

SouthAmerica: Bill Gates must have the best investment advisors in the world to help him invest his billions. He is also a good friend of Warren Buffet.

I don’t understand why he just invested $ 84 million dollars on a company that produces Ethanol from corn.

His investment advisors should know better than that…


***


April 26, 2010

SouthAmerica: I understand that the above ethanol from corn turned out to be a disaster for Bill Gates and he lost his shirt on that investment.


*****


June 2006

Discussion about Ethanol
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...genumber=1


*****


May 2009

More info about ethanol
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...ost2426165

…but the truth is with the advances that they have had in technology in Brazil in that area, today they can produce in the range of 12 to 14 times more ethanol made from sugar cane in Brazil than Americans can produce from corn in the USA from the same type of effort.


*****


May 23, 2007

Here is a very profitable game that Saudi Arabia also can play
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...ost1476641

…2) Second, Americans are not that smart and all you have to look at is how they go about in developing a new ethanol industry based on corn – you have to be pretty stupid to do that when you consider all the economic effects and gains and losses of such a strategy.

Again the way the American system is set up today it makes them do the wrong thing even when they are trying to do the right thing – in this case create a new ethanol industry from corn.

The corn lobby is very strong in Washington D.C. – and farm subsidies created for the support of food production it is miss-used instead for ethanol production


*****


July 5, 2008

The US economic system and the illusion of flexibility, agility, and efficiency
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...ost1982922

…Let me give you a quick example of how inefficient and “Dumb” the American economy has become - In a nutshell: ethanol.

Americans have been following for decades what is going on in Brazil regarding the production of ethanol from sugar cane.

That means that Americans can’t claim ignorance on this subject.

… Why Americans invested billions of dollars in the production of ethanol made from corn even though most people on the industry knew that the only reason they were doing that was to take advantage of government subsidies that had been in place to help grow corn during the Great depression to help feed the American population – and not to grow corn to make fuel for automobiles.

If the American system were an efficient system as they claim, then the US government would have passed new legislation to discourage the production of ethanol made from corn a long time ago – since corn production and the price of corn can have a major impact in the entire food production chain in the United States – from milk, to beef and so on….

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 26, 2010

James Hesson said: Well, I agree we have serious problems, but I prefer the perspective of Nobel prize winning economists like Paul Krugman of the New York Times who see danger and peril in our current situation, but also the possibility of reforming, regrouping, and reinventing our economy and finding a new fruitful direction, if the right choices are made.

The more specific examples you give are just one more area where I come to different conclusions. You say the Republican governor is leading the state of New Jersey to becoming a banana republic, and you give the library cutbacks as an example. Well, this is not the sole invention of the NJ governor: in fact, California made such cuts over a year ago. The local libraries have cut interlibrary loans, and reduced their hours. Well, that is a sad casualty of the recession, but it doesn't amount to apocalyptic ruin you invoke.


*****


Ricardo: In California they have more important priorities regarding on how to invest their tax dollars instead of investing in education, and that has been going on for decades.


The New United States Retirement System
http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...ost1080387

…May 23, 2006

SouthAmerica: I was trying to give you the big picture without having to spell out in plain English.

…In the early 1970’s California had one of the best educational systems in the country – from the early 1970’s to the middle 1990’s a period covering over 25 years – California did not build a single new university, but during the same time they built 25 new prisons to incarcerate their poor population – By the year 2000 California was in the bottom of the states in the rankings related to education – that decline in quality was a direct result of the “Brain Dead” strategy being used by most states in the US in the last 30 years.

Today we have a global economy and you don’t have to be a Rocket Scientist to figure out that the “Brain Dead” strategy will have a massive impact in the US in future years – This time will not be California alone that will be going to the bottom – it will be the US as a country.”


*****


Ricardo: Based on your comments you seem not to have a clue how valuable the US interlibrary loans system is for authors and researchers of all kind of subjects.

I don’t know of any country that has such an outstanding and effective interlibrary loans system as the one that we have in the USA.

Since you have not grasped the value of this system, then let me spell out for you.

When I was doing research for my book about Jose Bonifacio – I went to my local library here in New Jersey and requested about 30 books from libraries from around the country including Stanford University, Notre Dame University, Princeton, universities in Texas, and other libraries in NY State and in California.

Many of these books, some published in the late 1800’s we probably don’t have a copy of them even in Brazil. But in a matter of days the books started arriving at my local library, and after 10 days after I had requested them I had all the books at my disposal to continue my book research.

You can’t put a price in such a valuable research tool available to all Americans today.

Only idiots and morons would start cutting this valuable American intellectual asset.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 26, 2010

James Hesson: But, I am American and those things don't sway my opinion about whether this article is well written or not. We don't care much about aristocratic lineage.


*****


Ricardo: American intellect is more interested in gossip about Hollywood stars. And they are not interested in aristocratic lineages other than the Kennedy Family, the Bush Family, and Mickey Mouse and his pals.

Besides most Americans are not interested in world history, and geography, and most American kids have a hard time finding even where the United States is located on a global map.

.


.
Correction
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 26, 2010

Should read:

You can’t put a price in such a valuable research tool available to all Americans today.

Only idiots and morons would start cutting the funding to this valuable American intellectual asset system. And an important system that helps the US Human Capital to move forward with its research and innovation.

.



...
written by JH, April 26, 2010
My point is that your lineage has no relation to how I judge the quality of your argument. But you take a detour from this point to talk about "most Americans". All I can say is.... there you go again with the sweeping generalizations.

I don't have a general opinion about most Brazilians, only that I keep them all in my prayers since we are all dealing with the same difficulties life presents to us.

But if I had to give an opinion, I don't think the average Brazilian seems much different from the average American being preoccupied with the lives of TV stars. For a few years, I watched a great deal of the TV programs they love, and I can only see a similar appetite for schlocky entertainment. In fact, from what I could see much of it was a poor imitation of similar successful American programs.

While you say:
Besides most Americans are not interested in world history, and geography, and most American kids have a hard time finding even where the United States is located on a global map.


Again, you seem to have preference for sweeping generalizations. Sure many children in the US, like children elsewhere in the world, have little interest in these things, but again, you I would be more impressed if you cited comparative data on education performance of children in the US. Notwithstanding the poor performing schools mostly found in poor communities, the general education of most Americans is fairly high, comparable to EU nations, and much better than say 50 or 100 years ago. And I think if you are being honest with yourself, and not just lashing out because I questioned the veracity of this article, you would acknowledge that the state of public education in Brazil, unfortunately, is quite abysmal. One of the porteros in our building who was particularly unfriendly, asked me, "What's the life like in the Germany? Is it any better than here?" The other porteros reminded him that I was not from Germany, but the US. His response was, "So what? What's the difference?" They repeatedly tried to tell him that Germany was across the ocean on another continent far apart from the US, but he seemed to have trouble picturing this, or even caring about the difference. As I remember, Canadians, Austrailians, all EU people, and Americans who were light skinned were lumped together as Alemaos.
The same was true for Koreans, Indonesians, Chinese, Vietnamese, Cambodians, and others were all referred to as Japas. The same for Middle Easterners who were Turcos. As far as blacks were concerned, I know that racist Brazilians are fond of referring to them simply as monkeys. What also shocked me was that most Americans would not make such simplistic stereotypes, and if they did, they would never openly say it to someone as it would be in such bad taste or make them look idiotic. Yet, Brazilians would routinely call to me in market's as Alemao, and our Chinese friends as "Japa". So please, don't tell me about how most Americans don't know about geography or locate their country on a map as if your average Brazilian were so well educated about geography.

The reason I return less and less to this website is that what could be thoughtful exchange between Americans and Brazilians, typically degenerates into something that resembles a pissing contest between immature middle school children, witness the endless childish nonsense of people like Costinha here, and your final comments about "most Americans". Stick to the issue: you made bold sweeping generalizations about how the US could learn from Brazil in regards to the ethanol industry, without considering the social and environmental impact of this industry. In addition, you don't seem to know of the incredible resources the US is devoting now to oil dependence, bio fuels, and other alternative technologies. Then you make even greater generalizations about the demise and ruination of the US, "sinking like the Titanic" with "no hope in sight". As I said, while you cite some credible sources (Takes a Pillage), your conclusions are wild and melodramatic. And rather than admit your lack of knowledge of studies on the ethanol industry, you lash back by criticizing most Americans as being geographic illiterates. Even if in fact this is more so the case of Brazil, I don't wish to cite this fact as a put down of lesser educated Brazilians, but more of a reality check on one more wild generalization. The truth is, most Brazilians who are not able to locate countries on a map, like Americans, are at a relative disadvantage when it comes to educational opportunities. So in truth, I don't fault either of them, both American or Brazilian, but would rather call for better education opportunities for all of them. Yet, while I don't fault them for being not knowing these things, I do still question your claim that your are an economist, as you make such wild claims here, and document so poorly your argument.
...
written by JH, April 26, 2010
of course I understand the value of interlibrary loans in public libraries. My point, is that it is a very expensive service and libraries are being forced to cut these days to due the recession. As I mentioned, you can find ways to work around this and use interlibrary loan services in other more well funded libraries, and I am sure there are many such communities in Northern New Jersey. My preference, perhaps like yours, would be that they cut the bloated military budget and not the libraries, schools, parks etc. Even though you charge me and most Americans as being "morons" who don't understand the value of inter-library loans, you assume that "we" made such a choice. Of course, we did not. Certainly, it is a shame and a great inconvenience that inter-library loans are being cut, but this will not make NJ a "banana republic" nor is it an indication of the "sinking of the US economy like the Titanic." I would also differ with you about "most" scholars depending on interlibrary loans; most American scholars are associated with a university, and universities have NOT cut interlibrary loan services.
...
written by JH, April 26, 2010
Simpleton and Costina: is this English below? I guess I guess you are expecting me to feel put down by some clever remarks you made here, but unfortunately, I don't know what the heck you are trying say.
jH, please don't call our dear Costinha an a*****escent pta you can do. Try as we might we've never been able to get a compromisso on the price for articulating it's asshey and making our fine points go inside.


And Costinha, chocolate mice? Do you mean chocolate mousse? I don't get it? Chocolate mice? Is that you like? Call me provincial, but I'll stick to chocolate mousse.

I guess you think this gibberish is a kind of clever put down, but I might need a Martian interpreter to help me out on this one.

Jamie…. May I call you Jamie?


OK Jamie…. You are easier then choosing:

Press-1 for broccoli
Press-2 for chocolate mouse

Now then, did you find your pillow this morning after having the dream of eating 10 pounds of marshmallow last night?


My advise to you: Go brake another wishbone and see if your luck changes!

Uncle Sam, on second thought, I think I will tie you on the back bumper of the bus, or do you prefer walking the rest of the way? Happy calluses!




Not adaptive enough
written by Simpleton, April 27, 2010
Certainly not english / wasn't intended to be per se and certainly no put down towards you JH - sorry I forgot to mind the parser rules - Costinha = a$$holescent. Pay no mind to he-she, been on this site for a long long time and never changes - sometimes entertaining and once in a blue moon contributes something really astounding and worthy of reading. Watch out for the trolls, masqueraders and handle thiefs. They'll show up from time to time as well.

Please don't start in on the spelling and gramatical flaws of us morons. For pta use put_, mouse mousse, brake break, calluses (just pronounce that spelling in Brasilian Portugues if you can) callouses.

Mars from what I understand is f'ing cold and it's not much warmer here, that's why I like it down there more. Not shivering cuts down on the stuttering I guess I guess. If there are any more interpretations you feel you need just sing out.
Colloquial Namesakes
written by Simpleton, April 27, 2010
Yes, JH, in the hood they will call someone macaco - it's done in an endearing fashion as there is a law with significant penalties for doing that. Think of it just like here where "what's up nigga" is heard often enough (although I myself would never get away with it except with a few long time associates). Alemao, Japa, etc., are just convenient groupings - not something done out of stupidity. Only time I've been called Alemao is when someone I didn't know was trying to flag my attention for some reason or another. Friends and aquaintances when first trying to figure out where I'm from will tend to guess Alemao initially. No one gets it right. I leave them hanging and struggling to guess and eventually convince about half that I'm carioca before I let them off the hook and tell them the truth. It's kind of fun and no one is assuming in nature - in fact they are always quite surprised. Guess you might say I just don't fit any mold. That and alot of them have had very darn few contacts with folks from here but have had them with Alemaos which I would have to agree have somewhat similar appearances.
...
written by JH, April 27, 2010
Ricardo, where do you get this information below? I understand that the state of public education has dropped in recent years, and currently the UC system is suffering major cutbacks, but I have not seen any ranking of California at the bottom in terms of education. Louisiana, yes, but California, while it has dropped in ranking, I believe is still in somewhere in the top 20 (or better) in terms public schools.

By the year 2000 California was in the bottom of the states in the rankings related to education – that decline in quality was a direct result of the “Brain Dead” strategy being used by most states in the US in the last 30 year

...
written by JH, April 27, 2010
well Simpleton, thanks for the explanation, but in the US, that kind of "convenient" stereotyping is considered in poor taste or being uneducated. It is considered offensive, and degrading. But I know this is a difference between Brazil and the US.

I live in a temperate part of the US comparable to Sao Paulo, so the "I guess, I guess" was not due to shivering from the cold, to a lack of proof reading. Besides the most shivering I ever did in my life was living in an apartment in Sao Paulo without heat in winter. It may be cold in the US in many places, but your body acclimatizes, and you can dress for it; also, the homes are heated, so if you have the heat on, it shouldn't matter how cold it is outside.
I was just too lazy to proof read it, but that's the kind of silly stuff I write when I don't pay attention. My apologies.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 27, 2010

James Hesson: My point is that your lineage has no relation to how I judge the quality of your argument.


*****

April 27, 2010

Ricardo: Then why you bring up my lineage to this conversation?

And you bring up as if Americans don’t care about this sort of thing when it not true.

I see programs on television all the time implying that the Kennedy Family, and Bush Family are supposed to represent the American aristocracy.


*****


James Hesson: Again, you seem to have preference for sweeping generalizations. Sure many children in the US, like children elsewhere in the world, have little interest in these things, but again, you I would be more impressed if you cited comparative data on education performance of children in the US. Notwithstanding the poor performing schools mostly found in poor communities, the general education of most Americans is fairly high, comparable to EU nations, and much better than say 50 or 100 years ago.


*****


Ricardo: I probably agree with you that: “the general education of most Americans is much better than say 100 years ago.”

But when they are commenting about the knowledge of high school 12th graders, and a large part of college kids: they could not find Afghanistan on the map (the United States is fighting a war in that country), and many kids could not find the United States on the map. And these were not little kids, as you are trying to imply.


*****


James Hesson: The same was true for Koreans, Indonesians, Chinese, Vietnamese, Cambodians, and others were all referred to as Japas. The same for Middle Easterners who were Turcos. As far as blacks were concerned, I know that racist Brazilians are fond of referring to them simply as monkeys. What also shocked me was that most Americans would not make such simplistic stereotypes, and if they did, they would never openly say it to someone as it would be in such bad taste or make them look idiotic.


*****


Ricardo: James, you said: “What also shocked me was that most Americans would not make such simplistic stereotypes, and if they did, they would never openly say it to someone as it would be in such bad taste or make them look idiotic.”

The following is a list of ethnic slurs that are used as insinuations or allegations about members of a given ethnicity or to refer to them in a derogatory (critical or disrespectful), pejorative (disapproving or contemptuous), or insulting manner in the English-speaking world. For the purposes of this list, an ethnic slur is a term or word used to insult on the basis of race, ethnicity, or nationality.

James, be shocked then because Americans use these derogatory and demeaning terms to refer to various groups of people in a pejorative way all the time such as:

Italians = they call them Guido or Dago

A term used to describe a black person = Darky, Jigaboo, Sambo, Spade, Jungle bunny, and the N-word

A term used to describe a young black person = Niglet

A racial slur for being black on the outside and white on the inside = Oreo

An ethnic slur against Filipinos = Asian n****r

refers to people of Mexican descent = Beaner

Chinese person = Chinaman

a derogatory term for Asians = Gook

A French person = Frog

An offensive term for a white person = Honky, honkie

A derogatory term for affluent or highly-educated African-Americans = House n****r

anyone of Japanese descent = Jap, Nip

a Pole or a person of Polish origin = Polack

an ethnic slur used against Arabs, Indian Sikhs and some other peoples = Raghead

In the US, the term is offensive to many = Redneck

An ethnic slur against Arabs = Sand n****r

a person of Hispanic descent = Spic


There are a lot more insults that Americans use to refer to other people and if you want a long list of terms I can give it to you – the above is just a list of some of the most popular terms that Americans use.


*****


James Hesson: how the US could learn from Brazil in regards to the ethanol industry, without considering the social and environmental impact of this industry.


*****


Ricardo: I gave you a lot of links to the discussions regarding ethanol, and you can read all the information on these links, since we have been beating that subject to death for many years.


*****


James Hesson: Even if in fact this is more so the case of Brazil, I don't wish to cite this fact as a put down of lesser educated Brazilians, but more of a reality check on one more wild generalization.


*****


Ricardo: I am aware of the shortcomings of the educational system in Brazil, but that should be one of the priorities of the Brazilian government in the coming years, and part of the plan for Brazil to become one of the elite countries of the world.
.
Reply to JH
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 27, 2010

Ricardo: I don't know what happened when I posted the above information.


*****


James Hesson: I live in a temperate part of the US comparable to Sao Paulo


*****


Ricardo: In which state do you live here in the US?

I live on the New York/New Jersey Metropolitan area and this is a very rough area of the United States. When I go to the Amish country in PA for a few days, I feel like I am on another country populated by civilized people, and a country where courteous and nice people surround you.


*****


James Hesson: My point is that your lineage has no relation to how I judge the quality of your argument.


*****

April 27, 2010

Ricardo: Then why you bring up my lineage to this conversation?

And you bring up as if Americans don’t care about this sort of thing when it not true.

I see programs on television all the time implying that the Kennedy Family, and Bush Family are supposed to represent the American aristocracy.


*****


James Hesson: Again, you seem to have preference for sweeping generalizations. Sure many children in the US, like children elsewhere in the world, have little interest in these things, but again, you I would be more impressed if you cited comparative data on education performance of children in the US. Notwithstanding the poor performing schools mostly found in poor communities, the general education of most Americans is fairly high, comparable to EU nations, and much better than say 50 or 100 years ago.


*****


Ricardo: I probably agree with you that: “the general education of most Americans is much better than say 100 years ago.”

But when they are commenting about the knowledge of high school 12th graders, and a large part of college kids: they could not find Afghanistan on the map (the United States is fighting a war in that country), and many kids could not find the United States on the map. And these were not little kids, as you are trying to imply.


*****


James Hesson: The same was true for Koreans, Indonesians, Chinese, Vietnamese, Cambodians, and others were all referred to as Japas. The same for Middle Easterners who were Turcos. As far as blacks were concerned, I know that racist Brazilians are fond of referring to them simply as monkeys. What also shocked me was that most Americans would not make such simplistic stereotypes, and if they did, they would never openly say it to someone as it would be in such bad taste or make them look idiotic.


*****


Ricardo: James, you said: “What also shocked me was that most Americans would not make such simplistic stereotypes, and if they did, they would never openly say it to someone as it would be in such bad taste or make them look idiotic.”

The following is a list of ethnic slurs that are used as insinuations or allegations about members of a given ethnicity or to refer to them in a derogatory (critical or disrespectful), pejorative (disapproving or contemptuous), or insulting manner in the English-speaking world. For the purposes of this list, an ethnic slur is a term or word used to insult on the basis of race, ethnicity, or nationality.

James, be shocked then because Americans use these derogatory and demeaning terms to refer to various groups of people in a pejorative way all the time such as:

Italians = they call them Guido or Dago

A term used to describe a black person = Darky, Jigaboo, Sambo, Spade, Jungle bunny, and the N-word

A term used to describe a young black person = Niglet

A racial slur for being black on the outside and white on the inside = Oreo

An ethnic slur against Filipinos = Asian n****r

refers to people of Mexican descent = Beaner

Chinese person = Chinaman

a derogatory term for Asians = Gook

A French person = Frog

An offensive term for a white person = Honky, honkie

A derogatory term for affluent or highly-educated African-Americans = House n****r

anyone of Japanese descent = Jap, Nip

a Pole or a person of Polish origin = Polack

an ethnic slur used against Arabs, Indian Sikhs and some other peoples = Raghead

In the US, the term is offensive to many = Redneck

An ethnic slur against Arabs = Sand n****r

a person of Hispanic descent = Spic


There are a lot more insults that Americans use to refer to other people and if you want a long list of terms I can give it to you – the above is just a list of some of the most popular terms that Americans use.


*****


James Hesson: how the US could learn from Brazil in regards to the ethanol industry, without considering the social and environmental impact of this industry.


*****


Ricardo: I gave you a lot of links to the discussions regarding ethanol, and you can read all the information on these links, since we have been beating that subject to death for many years.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 27, 2010

James Hesson: So in truth, I don't fault either of them, both American or Brazilian, but would rather call for better education opportunities for all of them. Yet, while I don't fault them for being not knowing these things, I do still question your claim that your are an economist, as you make such wild claims here, and document so poorly your argument.


*****


Ricardo: The point that you seem to be missing is that Brazil is on the way up, and the United States is on the way down. And that happens to all superpowers over a period of time.

In Brazil we need to lift over 100 million people from their poverty and illiteracy condition in the coming years. And that will be a major endeavor.

In the United States the educational system is deteriorating and going to hell in a hand basket and we can see people complaining about it all around us.

What happened to the California educational system in the last 30 years is becoming the norm for the rest of the country. And today, many states here in the United States spend more money with their prison systems than they are doing with their educational system.
It is a real recipe for future disaster.


*****


James Hesson: of course I understand the value of interlibrary loans in public libraries. My point, is that it is a very expensive service and libraries are being forced to cut these days to due the recession. As I mentioned, you can find ways to work around this and use interlibrary loan services in other more well funded libraries, and I am sure there are many such communities in Northern New Jersey. My preference, perhaps like yours, would be that they cut the bloated military budget and not the libraries, schools, parks etc. Even though you charge me and most Americans as being "morons" who don't understand the value of inter-library loans, you assume that "we" made such a choice. Of course, we did not.


*****


Ricardo: You must be aware that the state of New Jersey is well known to be one of the most corrupt states in the US.

If we did not have idiots running our state then they would find a million other places to cut the state budget instead of the funding to local libraries.


*****


James Hesson: Ricardo, where do you get this information below? I understand that the state of public education has dropped in recent years, and currently the UC system is suffering major cutbacks, but I have not seen any ranking of California at the bottom in terms of education. Louisiana, yes, but California, while it has dropped in ranking, I believe is still in somewhere in the top 20 (or better) in terms public schools.


*****


Ricardo: I spent many months doing research regarding my second book which was published in 1999.

On that book I have about 80 pages about everything you want to know about the United States prison system – and one of the states that had the biggest expansion on their prison system was California, and it is well documented how the educational system in California went from being one of the best in the United States to one of the worst during that same period of time.

If you Google and try to find information on this subject you probably come across many articles on the subject, the information is out there.


*****


James Hesson: well Simpleton, thanks for the explanation, but in the US, that kind of "convenient" stereotyping is considered in poor taste or being uneducated. It is considered offensive, and degrading. But I know this is a difference between Brazil and the US.


*****


Ricardo: You must be kidding about this comment, Americans use stereotyping, and insulting terms in reference to other people all the time.


*****


James Hesson: I live in a temperate part of the US comparable to Sao Paulo


*****


Ricardo: In which state do you live here in the US?

I live on the New York/New Jersey Metropolitan area and this is a very rough area of the United States. When I go to the Amish country in PA for a few days, I feel like I am on another country populated by civilized people, and a country where courteous and nice people surround you.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 27, 2010

By the way, I don't use today, and did not use in the past any of the terms that I listed above to insult anybody. My family and friends don't use that kind of language.

.
...
written by JH, April 27, 2010
Ricardo: Then why you bring up my lineage to this conversation?

And you bring up as if Americans don’t care about this sort of thing when it not true.

I see programs on television all the time implying that the Kennedy Family, and Bush Family are supposed to represent the American aristocracy.


I did not bring it up; look back to Simpleton who writes:
Ricardo, I (and I asssume others) thank you for your above reply to Hesson. Very interesting information indeed (and not one word on your hereditarial connections).


The Kennedy's and Bush family hold little interest for me in general and they are far from being aristocratic. My reply was more to Simpleton, who surprised me by making this comment about your "hereditarial connections" as if they was supposed to impress me or change my view of your article.

From the found of the country in 1776, Americans have been known for not favoring others for hereditary and aristocratic lineage. It was part of making a break with the old oppressive feudal social relations still holding sway in Europe. From what I could see of Brazil, there are still far more traces of this kind of reverence for aristocratic lineage, with a history of respecting large land owners (? fazenderos) and powerful patriarchs. I am not sure how to describe the differences I saw in Brazil vs the US, but there is just a general kind of respect and awareness of class, title and position that seems more rigid in Brazil than the US. I don't wish to speculate about the origin of this kind of respect, but just want to point out that this sort of reverence holds little sway in US culture compared to Brazil.

...
written by JH, April 27, 2010
Ricardo you list a bunch of slurs used to name ethnic groups in America. Well, I don't know where you live in Northern New Jersey, but it sounds like you need to get out more often before you make generalizations about Americans based on what you see there. Sure, as I said, I have lived college towns, and small middle class communities for most of my life, and I can't recall anyone ever using such terms earnestly to describe ethnic groups. As I said, such language is considered poor taste, and uneducated among most educated middle class Americans I know. I am guessing as you said, you are in a rough area of northern New Jersey where some people use these terms, but certainly this is not the norm for most Americans. After the Civil Rights era, ethnic slurs became more passe and marked you as uneducated and unsophisticated. It may be that in certain working class communities or poor communities in Norther NJ, you hear such terms, but in the various places I have lived in the US, I never hear such language.
Yeah, you can do a google search and find such terms, just as you might find such terms used to describe ethnic groups in the 19th century, but I would ask you, how common are they in the US? In Brazil, such terms are prevalent in everyday life, TV, business, and politics. This style in the US, has been on the wane since the Civil Rights era, and if you got out of your community of NJ, you would note this. Try visiting one of the many college towns on the East coast or more well educated suburbs, and I am sure you will be hard pressed to find people who use these terms. But you seemed to be bent on seeing the US one way and Brazil another, so it may not matter to you what I have to say about this.
...
written by JH, April 27, 2010
Your general point about the ethanol industry of Brazil as a model for the US is lost on me when you consider how it functions in Brazil in regards to class exploitation and environmental impact. Your point about how the US is plummeting and Brazil is skyrocketing is also questionable. While Brazil is rising in certain respects, it still has so far to go in terms of the quality of life for most of its citizens. Certainly long to go before it can claim some kind of super power status, or even to be considered in the ranks of most EU nations or the US. Even former Soviet Satellite nations in the EU like The Czech Republic hold a better standard of living for their average citizens than Brazil holds for theirs. Likewise, there have been certain reductions to the quality of life in the US for many Americans since the recession, but this is not an inevitable trend, nor does it mean the imply the kind of ruination and demise implied by your melodramatic descriptions. The fate of the US will be determined by the political direction of the country. In other words, if we get another Republican president who gives a trillion dollars in tax breaks to the rich and leads us into another dumbass war like Iraq and Afghanistan, then surely the decline will begin to look like a plummet. Yet, all the other problems you mentioned about the demise of Goldman Sachs, et al, will not mean result in the ruination of the US.

By the way, I browsed some of the notes on ethanol production, but they are too long and rambling for me to make sense of them. I am no expert on bio fuels, not even close, but I do know the US is pouring quite a lot of money into alternative energy research, so I don't buy your point that the US has "lots to learn" from Brazil.
And yes, it is well known that ethanol from corn is less efficient than from sugarcane. Yet, if the US is trying to become independent of oil, shouldn't we be developing a fuel based on agricultural products that thrive in this hemisphere? Sure, buying a certain amount of ethanol from other countries might be reasonable, but I know there is research into bio fuels based switchback grass that is native to he US. This seems to be the more reasonable path of development for the US in regards to bio fuels.
You also made other outrageous generalizations about the US not learning anything since the 70s in regard to reducing oil dependence. I beg to differ. The environmental movement and concomitant research is one of the most extensive in the world, certainly nothing in Brazil compares to it. Among this movement, many are concerned about the development of alternative fuels. While the auto industry has been slow to change, many Americans have been opting for fuel efficient cars recently, especially in light of global warming and any rise in gasoline prices. I don't know about where you live, but every other car I see on the highway is a Prius hybrid or some other fuel efficient Asian car. I have lived in college towns where the awareness of global warming runs high: alternative energies are important, as well as environmental concerns. I saw nothing equivalent to this in Brazil. So, please, careful with the generalizations.
...
written by JH, April 27, 2010
Also, you talk about predicting the economic collapse of the US, but as I mentioned, many have been predicting a loss in strategic power and influence of the US, long before the recession. I remember in 2005, reading in the CIA Factbook (online) a prediction about the likely decline of the US as other nations (BRIC) begin to edge out the US in various spheres of influence. This may take anywhere from 10-50 years, but this would not be so bad to me. I don't see it as essential that the US be a super power. England lost its imperial dominance early in the 20th century, but the standard of living for Brits has increased greatly since then. This will likely be the case for the US. We may share super power status with China now, or soon in the future, but this does not mean the US standard of living will look like China's nor will the standard of living of China look like the US. I think it is only fair and reasonable for more poor developing nations to raise the standard of living for their people. If it means the Americans has to tighten their belts and live more modestly, I have no problem with this either. But, I don't celebrate the "sinking of the Titanic" or ruination of the US. We remain one of the few countries in the world where basic human rights are respected. We are one of the more progressive forces and voices in the world. I known many Brazilians on this site can't bear to acknowledge this and only want to focus on the greed of Wall St, but this is only one of many faces of the US. I would prefer to look ways to steer the US through this recession back into a more productive era, with less wars, a better education system, and more effiicient use of energy.
...
written by JH, April 27, 2010
oh, and unlike you, I don't see CHINA INC. as a model for the development of Brazil, unless you favor an unmitigated brutal regime that is preoccupied with the interest of business. Development is coming at a great price to the Chinese in terms of oppressive political practices, corruption, harsh exploitation of labor, and environmental destruction. While this would greatly benefit the elite of Brazil, I wonder if it would help the average Brazilian. Likewise, while Brazil is developing, and rising as you say, I wonder if much of this is developing the wealth of the elite, but not seriously improving the life of the poor in Brazil. I have to wonder if the oil reserves will serve the poor, or just to further profit the rich.
...
written by Andrade , April 27, 2010

I have to wonder if the oil reserves will serve the poor, or just to further profit the rich.


The ethanol program never benefited the poor nor is the "Oil Reserves" 10,000 meters underneath the seabed going to. Both the programs are enriching the few "chosen ones" and anybody saying the contrary is talking baloney.
In Closing.....
written by Dnb, April 27, 2010
James Hennson is the Truth!smilies/wink.gif Ricardo Amaral is fantasizing.


Biblically speaking here is the forecast.

The U.S in conjunction with Great Britain, (for they never have truly been apart behind the scenes) will be the last "Super Power" before everyone gives it up to the United Nations.

 And there are seven kings: five have fallen, one is, the other has not yet arrived, but when he does arrive he must remain a short while. 11 And the wild beast that was but is not, it is also itself an eighth [king], but springs from the seven, and it goes off into destruction. Revelation 17:10

The Anglo American world power is the 7th king. Take further note. Ten symbolically means "complete" in an earthly sense.

“And the ten horns that you saw mean ten kings, who have not yet received a kingdom, but they do receive authority as kings one hour with the wild beast. 13 These have one thought, and so they give their power and authority to the wild beast.


BOOM!....
Equalization here. No real "super power" so to speak. No "decoupling". Simply domino effect!!!!

This prophecy aptly describes the fragile composition of this socialist 7th world power symbolized as being made of "iron and clay".
The "iron" being the structure of rulership. The "clay" being the influential voice and will of the people.. NOT MIXING , just as iron and clay don't mix and hold.

“And whereas you beheld the feet and the toes to be partly of molded clay of a potter and partly of iron, the kingdom itself will prove to be divided, but somewhat of the hardness of iron will prove to be in it, forasmuch as you beheld the iron mixed with moist clay. 42 And as for the toes of the feet being partly of iron and partly of molded clay, the kingdom will partly prove to be strong and will partly prove to be fragile. 43 Whereas you beheld iron mixed with moist clay, they will come to be mixed with the offspring of mankind; but they will not prove to be sticking together, this one to that one, just as iron is not mixing with molded clay.


“And whereas you beheld the feet and the toes to be partly of molded clay of a potter and partly of iron, the kingdom itself will prove to be divided, but somewhat of the hardness of iron will prove to be in it, forasmuch as you beheld the iron mixed with moist clay. 42 And as for the toes of the feet being partly of iron and partly of molded clay, the kingdom will partly prove to be strong and will partly prove to be fragile. 43 Whereas you beheld iron mixed with moist clay, they will come to be mixed with the offspring of mankind; but they will not prove to be sticking together, this one to that one, just as iron is not mixing with molded clay.
44 “And in the days of those kings the God of heaven will set up a kingdom that will never be brought to ruin. And the kingdom itself will not be passed on to any other people. It will crush and put an end to all these kingdoms, and it itself will stand to times indefinite; Daniel 2:41-44)


Sorry,,,, But no real Brazilian or Chineese uprising here. smilies/cry.gifsmilies/shocked.gifsmilies/sad.gif

If anything the U.S will be the United Nations biggest cheerleader with everyone else following suit. That's written too.
...
written by Ric, April 27, 2010
Certainly the US could learn from Brazil (and Mexico) on how to deal with illegal immigration.

What is likely over the next few years as realities set in is cutting foreign aid, bringing home the armed forces from abroad and closing overseas bases, tightening up on entitlement fraud, and rejecting at the polls, the progressive agenda.

The priviledged position the USA has enjoyed is mainly geopolitical. That's not likely to change. Unlike most countries, it could be self-supporting in virtually all areas if it had to. Energy, food, defense, manufacturing, science, communications, the list goes on. Count them out at your own peril.

As I leave the Amazon for Santa Barbara next month, for awhile, I'll be looking closely to see if the above predictions and analyses are noticable on the street. Chances are that the restaurants are still full, K Marts still kept alive by Hispanics, houses still selling for a million or more, the 405 and the 101 still clogged with Beemers, Mercedes and other cars less than 5 years old.

The Grove will still be doing business, Rodeo Drive still selling expensive stuff, guys still making forty dollars an hour, dealers selling out of ammo at the Pomona gun show, guys building $100 K '32 roadsters to order still turning away business.

Now if the system crashes and there is a resulting world-wide depression, the dollar crashes and takes with it all paper currencies, which is the only scenario that makes sense, you would probably still be OK in Santa Barbara.

But if you are educated middle class, which you would probably be if reading this, your life would not be worth a plugged nickel in Rio, SP, Durban, Mexico Cee, etc.

I think I'll go up to Cold Spring on the 154 next month and muse on these things. Shouldn't need a reservation if things are as bad as depicted herin.




Busy
written by Simpleton, April 28, 2010
The crash and burn internationally is going to have it's affects. It's going to get much much worse near term before it gets better but you are right Ric, things aren't going to just belly up totally and everywhere in every sector and leave the US phenomena as a spec of dust existing only in the ancient history books of the future. It's a wave - just ride it out.

A friend of mine changed jobs a few months ago - tons and tons of overtime. The local bars are busier these days than before the problems commenced. The percentage of patrons who are unemployed is however signifcantly higher. There's also a percentage of the self-employed types that are having a hard time keeping up to all the work they are finding vs previously scrapping / having to keep up the hustle big time to try to keep their heads afloat - times are actually very very good right now for them.

Ric, somehow I thought you were based somewhere near the coast in the sertao vs in amazonia. Need ideas for someplace nice to visit farther up the coast than Vila Velho. That's as far north as we've managed so far (although I've done Salvador sozinho). Joao Pessoa? Someplace near by? Love surf fishing. Dnb you could offer suggestion as well but we're really not party animals.
...
written by Ric, April 28, 2010
Ilheus is nice, as is the area from Fortaleza south to Aracati.
...
written by JH, April 28, 2010
The ethanol program never benefited the poor nor is the "Oil Reserves" 10,000 meters underneath the seabed going to. Both the programs are enriching the few "chosen ones" and anybody saying the contrary is talking baloney.


Andrade: sadly, I have similar suspicion. What is interesting is that the wealth of Brazil will inevitably continue to develop (barring unforeseen forces) but this may not mean that necessarily translate into dramatic improvements in the quality of life for poor Brazilians. As Slavoj Zizek has pointed out, in the past, when capitalism developed in Europe, the US, Australia and Canada, the democracy also expanded in these developed nations, Yet China is a unique precedent: it is continuing to successfully develop its economy, while its political life is oppressive and undemocratic. This is a dangerous model for the world. I wonder if it can truly appeal to other third world nations. I seem to hear people on this site suggesting that China is a good model for Brazil. China is something like the fascist regimes of the 30s, with a government dedicated to needs of industry, willing to repress any political movement that hinders the clean operation of business and profit. Brazil already has problems with endemic inequality of wealth. To add to this problem a repressive model of governing would be catastrophic. Frankly, from what I know of Brazilians, I don't think they would ever stand for the repressive practices found in China.
...
written by JH, April 28, 2010
But when they are commenting about the knowledge of high school 12th graders, and a large part of college kids: they could not find Afghanistan on the map (the United States is fighting a war in that country), and many kids could not find the United States on the map. And these were not little kids, as you are trying to imply.


Ricardo, I am sure if you look at only certain Americans, you can find those who know little about geography, but there is a wide gap between the education level of most Americans compared to Brazilians. This is not meant as a boast since surely there are many poorly funded schools and low performing students in the US. But it is meant as a reality check. You seem to just want to paint a negative picture of the US even if you distort the facts. I would love to see Brazil the kind of resources the US has devoted to their public schools. It would be of great benefit to Brazilians. If you can't see the obvious differences between the education system of Brazil and the US, you are truly lost and blinded by jingoism. You are not helping your country by pretending that public school students in Brazil are comparable to the US. You are just cherry picking your facts about the US school system. Clearly, education is being hit hard by the recession, but to claim most college students couldn't pick out Afghanistan or the US on a map is pathetic nonsense. Again, stick to the subject of your essay: US has lots to learn from Brazil on oil dependence. You don't make a good case for this, and you don't seem to know what the US is doing in terms of research on bio fuels.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

James Hesson: Ricardo you list a bunch of slurs used to name ethnic groups in America. Well, I don't know where you live in Northern New Jersey, but it sounds like you need to get out more often before you make generalizations about Americans based on what you see there.


*****


Ricardo: I live in a very nice area of New Jersey, but a lot of the slurs that I mentioned on that list are used on a regular basis in the New York/New Jersey Metropolitan area. You can go to any high school in our area and every second word out of the kids’ mouth is the F-word. It seems to me that the kids don’t know how to communicate without using the F-word all the time.

And I am shocked about how many people started using the N-word since Barack Obama got elected president – and including some people that you would not expect them to use that kind of language.

Barack Obama is doing a much better job than I expected considering the massive mess that he inherited from the prior administration – and the worst economic conditions since the Great depression.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

James Hesson: Your general point about the ethanol industry of Brazil as a model for the US is lost on me when you consider how it functions in Brazil in regards to class exploitation and environmental impact.


*****


Ricardo: We had been discussing about ethanol for years at the Elite Trader Economics Forum and I also wrote about ethanol in some of my articles. We did beat that subject to death with covering the pros and cons and so on…

Anyway, here are some of the things that I wrote about ethanol in the last 4 to 5 years:

“I know that President Lula thinks that Brazil can be the new Saudi Arabia and feed the US energy market with ethanol made of sugar cane, but that concept is complete nonsense.

In my opinion, ethanol made from sugarcane is a good solution for Brazil regarding its energy needs, but it is not a good idea to export this solution to other countries around the world, since we will need all the available land to grow food not only for Brazil, but also to feed other countries around the world.

The world is moving very fast in the direction of future food shortages and there are many reasons for that and it would be criminal for a country such as Brazil that could help alleviate this growing food shortage and help to feed millions of mouths around the world, and instead Brazil uses its valuable agricultural resources to feed car engines of people who don't have even a minimum of common sense since they are driving big gas guzzling SUV's.

I wonder why Lula is even suggesting that Brazil should start exporting ethanol to the United States. The United States has made a long term commitment to supply its ethanol market with ethanol made from corn; besides in the last 6 years, the United States has invested over US$ 1 trillion dollars in Iraq in their pursuit of new sources of oil.

The United States has placed their big bets on ethanol made from corn and in Iraq as a new source of oil, and it will be very hard to turn the tide around on all the vested interests involved in these bets.

The United States should keep the 54 cents per gallon tariff on ethanol from Brazil, or even increase the tariff to US$ 1.00 per gallon, since ethanol imported from Brazil would compete with the ethanol made from corn in the United States and the new ethanol imported from Brazil would help very little and it is not a viable solution to meet the US energy needs.

Brazil should not export ethanol to any other country, and Brazil should use ethanol only for its domestic needs. Today Brazil has its act together and the last thing Brazil needs is for the US market to start sucking the ethanol from the needs inside Brazil and creating further inflation in Brazil.

What the Brazilian government needs to do immediately is to pass a federal tax on ethanol exported to other countries to discourage the exporting of ethanol from the Brazilian local economy.

They are in the process of building another 50 ethanol refineries in Brazil to meet the local ethanol demand in the coming years. Brazil needs all the ethanol that it will produce in the coming years and Brazil can't afford to sell the ethanol to the highest bids from around the world.

The Brazilian ethanol export tax should go up according to the price of oil on the international markets and always be a little higher to discourage people from other countries from buying ethanol from Brazil.

Brazil should use its growing agricultural power to grow food, and Brazil can make agriculture in Brazil a more profitable business by moving up on the food chain. Instead of selling the raw materials Brazil can start manufacturing the foods that people want around the world since manufactured products usually have a higher profit margin than raw materials with few exceptions, and oil comes to mind.

Brazil should prepare itself to help feed the growing middle classes in countries such as China, India, and the oil producing countries of the Middle East, since that is where demand for food is going to be coming from, and Brazil can provide food for these markets.”

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

James Hesson: Your point about how the US is plummeting and Brazil is skyrocketing is also questionable. While Brazil is rising in certain respects, it still has so far to go in terms of the quality of life for most of its citizens. Certainly long to go before it can claim some kind of super power status, or even to be considered in the ranks of most EU nations or the US. Even former Soviet Satellite nations in the EU like The Czech Republic hold a better standard of living for their average citizens than Brazil holds for theirs.


*****


Ricardo: Brazil is two countries into one. About 30 or 40 million have an standard of living no different than the middle class in Europe, or the United States. Then you have another 60 to 70 million people that are improving their standard of living. And finally we have the other Brazil with around 100 million people living in complete poverty.

Brazil has a long way to go to provide a decent living standard for the majority of the population. But it can be done over a period of time with the proper economic and social development plan.

The idea of having 2 superpowers is the world of yesterday. In the 21st century we are going to have major block of countries trading with each other such as: the European Union (including Russia), the United States Union, the Asian Union, the African Union, and possibly even a new block that is not even on the radar as yet.

Each country will choose which block they want to belong based on their self-interest.

This mentality of superpower status is a mentality of the 20th century.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

James Hesson: Likewise, there have been certain reductions to the quality of life in the US for many Americans since the recession, but this is not an inevitable trend, nor does it mean the imply the kind of ruination and demise implied by your melodramatic descriptions. The fate of the US will be determined by the political direction of the country. In other words, if we get another Republican president who gives a trillion dollars in tax breaks to the rich and leads us into another dumb ass war like Iraq and Afghanistan, then surely the decline will begin to look like a plummet. Yet, all the other problems you mentioned about the demise of Goldman Sachs, et al, will not mean result in the ruination of the US.


*****


Ricardo: Nikolai Dmitriyevich Kondratiev (1892-193smilies/cool.gif was a Russian economist, who was a proponent of the New Economic Policy (NEP) in the Soviet Union. He was executed at the height of Stalin's Great Purge and "rehabilitated" fifty years later.

He proposed a theory that Western capitalist economies have long-term (60 years) cycles of boom followed by depression. These business cycles are now called "Kondratiev waves", or grand supercycles.

In 1924, after publishing his first book, presenting the first tentative version of his theory of the major cycles, Kondratiev travelled to England, Germany, Canada and the United States, and visited several universities before returning to Russia.

A proponent of the Soviet New Economic Policy (NEP), Kondratiev favored the strategic option for the primacy of agriculture and the industrial production of consumer goods, over the development of heavy industry.

Kondratiev’s influence on economic policy lasted until 1925, declined in 1926 and ended by 1927. Around this time, the NEP was dissolved by a political shift in the leadership of the Communist Party.

Kondratiev was removed from the directorship of the Institute of Conjuncture in 1928 and arrested in July 1930, accused of being member of an illegal and probably non-existent ‘Peasants’ Labour Party’. As early as August 1930, Soviet Premier Joseph Stalin wrote a letter to Prime Minister Vyacheslav Molotov asking for the execution of Kondratiev.

His last letter was sent to his daughter, Elena Kondratieva, on 31 August 1938. Shortly afterwards, on 17 September during Stalin's Great Purge, he was subjected to a second trial, condemned to ten years without the right to correspond with the outside world; however, Kondratiev was executed by firing squad on the same day it was issued. Kondratiev was 46 at the time of his execution and was only rehabilitated almost fifty years later, on 16 July 1987.


*****


We are in a business cycle, but not the usual business cycle that most people have in mind. We are in one of these grand supercycles also known as "Kondratiev waves"; capitalist economies have long-term (60 years) cycles of boom followed by depression. We have reached the depression area of the cycle.

Nikolai Kondratiev, published a study in 1926 showing that a very long-term economic cycle existed. His major premise was that capitalist economies had a pattern of long wave cycles of boom and bust. The bust cycle repeated itself approximately every 60 years. If you had read Kondratiev's paper in 1926, you would have known that an economic great depression was around the corner.

Kondratiev identified four distinct phases the economy goes through during each cycle: 1) Inflationary growth, 2) Stagflation, 3) Deflationary growth, and finally 4) Depression—falling prices, falling stock prices, falling profits, debt collapse.

As the stock market and banking system is collapsing, a number of corporate scandals emerge such as Enron, WorldCom, Global Crossing, Adelphia Communications, Arthur Anderson, Bear Stearns, Lehman Brothers, sub-prime scandal, hedge fund scandals, Bernie Madoff scandal, Goldman Sachs scandal, and many others. As the debt load reaches new highs in the economy, the result is a record-breaking number of personal and corporate bankruptcies, (GM, Chrysler) as is the case in the United States today. (They also had major bankruptcies and bank failures in Europe.)

Believe me, when I say to you that the new global economic depression is underway - and it is right on schedule.

Sure we had massive US government intervention in the market place in the last 2 years to keep the US economy afloat a little longer, and the only reason the financial institutions are reporting any earnings (artificial earnings) is because they changed the accounting rules to help the financial institutions manufacture their fake earnings – if they all apply market to market accounting rules then their earnings sink like the Titanic – and some of these institutions probably would be driven out of business. It is like living in the world of illusion at the highest degree.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

James Hesson: You also made other outrageous generalizations about the US not learning anything since the 70s in regard to reducing oil dependence. I beg to differ. The environmental movement and concomitant research is one of the most extensive in the world, certainly nothing in Brazil compares to it. Among this movement, many are concerned about the development of alternative fuels. While the auto industry has been slow to change, many Americans have been opting for fuel efficient cars recently, especially in light of global warming and any rise in gasoline prices. I don't know about where you live, but every other car I see on the highway is a Prius hybrid or some other fuel efficient Asian car. I have lived in college towns where the awareness of global warming runs high: alternative energies are important, as well as environmental concerns. I saw nothing equivalent to this in Brazil. So, please, careful with the generalizations.


*****


Ricardo: In 1973 the US imports 45 per cent of its oil needs.

Feb 21, 2010 - A rising focus on "energy security" by both the Bush administration and Congress has added momentum to efforts to employ home-grown fuel sources like ethanol to reduce US dependency on oil imports. About 60 percent of US petroleum supplies come from imports currently.

Source:
http://www.google.com/search?q...KoBEMkBKAk


In a NUTSHELL: The United States imported 45 per cent of its oil needs in 1973 at the time of the global oil shock.

And 37 years later, in 2010 the United States will be importing 60 per cent of its oil needs. In 2010 the United States is more dependent than ever on imported oil.


*****


Reality Check: In 1973 Brazil imported 90 per cent of its oil needs. Since 2006 Brazil is an oil exporting country.

In 2010 Brazil is independent from imported oil - And the United States is more dependent than ever on importing oil from the most-unstable geopolitical areas of the world.

And in this process the United States has been transferring $ 100’s of billions of US dollars of real wealth from the United States economy to the oil producing countries of the world.

It does not matter how many people you see driving Prius hybrids today, at the end of the day what counts is that the United States is over 30 percent more dependent on imported oil in 2010 than the US was in 1973.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

James Hesson: Also, you talk about predicting the economic collapse of the US, but as I mentioned, many have been predicting a loss in strategic power and influence of the US, long before the recession.

…But, I don't celebrate the "sinking of the Titanic" or ruination of the US. We remain one of the few countries in the world where basic human rights are respected.


*****


Ricardo: Eventually the supercycle catches up with the global economy, and the world has a great depression. That is when everything that is completely out of sync collapses and from the ashes you start a brand new supercycle and everything repeats again.

We are away overdue for another great depression.


*****


James Hesson: I don't see CHINA INC. as a model for the development of Brazil, unless you favor an unmitigated brutal regime that is preoccupied with the interest of business.


*****


Ricardo: After you have the chance to read the new book “China’s Megatrends” by John Naisbitt – you will find it mind-boggling the massive transformation that has been underway in China in the last 20 years, and the transformation is moving faster and faster.

After you read this book you will realize that the China model for development is not only good for Brazil – that might be an excellent choice to reorganize the US economy.


*****


James Hesson: Development is coming at a great price to the Chinese in terms of oppressive political practices, corruption, harsh exploitation of labor, and environmental destruction.


*****


Ricardo: Your image of China in 2010 would be similar as if a Chinese person were thinking that Americans are oppressive and they don’t let black people use the same bathroom of white people, Al Capone is going crazy in Chicago and that city is full of corrupt politicians. In the South of the United States they have a semi-slavery system and a harsh exploitation of labor for the cotton pickers. And regarding the environmental destruction in the United States you can get the picture by looking to a simple example: Love Canal
http://toxipedia.org/display/t...l+Disaster

If you think this is an accurate description of the United States in 2010, that is the equivalent picture that you have on your mind regarding China when compared with what is actually happening in China in 2010.


*****


James Hesson: You are just cherry picking your facts about the US school system. Clearly, education is being hit hard by the recession, but to claim most college students couldn't pick out Afghanistan or the US on a map is pathetic nonsense.


*****


Ricardo: The mainstream media including CNN show to the public how ignorant American kids are regarding geography.

In world competition American kids usually rank very low when compared with Asian, and European kids in Math and sciences.


*****


James Hesson: Again, stick to the subject of your essay: US has lots to learn from Brazil on oil dependence. You don't make a good case for this, and you don't seem to know what the US is doing in terms of research on bio fuels.


*****


Ricardo: Maybe you think the Brazilian performance is not good enough, with Brazil going from being 90 percent dependent on imported oil in 1973 to being an oil exporting country in 2010.

On my book this is a very good performance compared to:

On the other hand, the United States imported 45 per cent of its oil needs in 1973 and in 2010 the United States will be importing 60 per cent of its oil needs.

.
...
written by Lots to learn?, April 29, 2010
Ricardo: Maybe you think the Brazilian performance is not good enough, with Brazil going from being 90 percent dependent on imported oil in 1973 to being an oil exporting country in 2010.

On my book this is a very good performance compared to:

On the other hand, the United States imported 45 per cent of its oil needs in 1973 and in 2010 the United States will be importing 60 per cent of its oil needs.


While its commendable that Brazil is independent of importing oil, I have read far too much questioning the limits of ethanol production as it is practiced in Sao Paulo state in regards to the poor treatment of destitute sugarcane cutters and environmental impact to think of it as a model for the US, more specifically, I don't see the US having "lots to learn" from Brazil on this issue. Certainly, in a general sense, it is an important goal for the US to reduce its oil dependence. I think it has not been a major priority of any administration until recently. I believe Obama, although taking relatively modest steps in this direction, certainly understand this. He has a diverse energy policy which pleases and displease both liberal and conservatives. Yet he, unlike Bush, acknowledges global warming, and has supported diverse initiatives that would reduce oil dependence, including bio fuels research, fuel efficiency, conservation, expansion of nuclear power plants, and off shore drilling.

In regards to your reply about cherry picking facts about the education system, you are still making generalizations: some vague reference to CNN, and a comparison between the US, Asia, and EU. Asia is a vast continent. Do you really believe that the US falls behind every Asian nation in terms of general education? Show me the facts, not some generalizations. I have heard such reports about the US vs the EU, and I could believe the average test scores on Math and Language could may rank higher than the US, depending on the school, but again, most of the failing school in the US correlate with poverty. The US, like Brazil, has a wider range of inequality of wealth compared to most EU nations. Yet, if you looked at the middle class schools and compared them to EU public schools, you would see something comparable. Certainly, most your claim that Americans in college could not identify their country on a map is ludicrous. Most pre-school, whether serving rich or poor kids in the US, are have students identify the continents, as well as the US on a map. You just seem to be throwing around sloppy generalizations here. You seem quite bitter about the US and unable to really assess things in a measured manner. Certainly the inner city schools that primarily serve the poor have been struggling for decades. Obama is in the process of trying new reforms. It is hard to know where this will go.

I also take offense to you calling me or other Americans "morons" because you think we don't understand the value of inter library loans. Of course many of us do, and we are saddened to see any cuts in spending for education or library, parks or any general public services. But there is a recession, and we have attended town meetings, petitioned our representatives, but at the end of the day, these matters are not in our control.

But another thing comes to mind when I hear you whining about how your interlibrary services are cut. Why do you insult American taxpayers who do pay for this service which anyone, both citizen or non-citizen can use? You seem to be displaying some selfish sense of entitlement ranting about the "moron Americans" who cut your interlibrary loans. As I said, this service can be quite costly, and it service far less library patrons than other essential library services.

When I lived in Brazil, I little or no access to a good library, but I never called the Brazilians morons for not funding their library system. I tried to show a certain gratitude and humility for whatever services were provided by the country. You seem to be lacking both when you lambast Americans as "morons" for cutting your access to interlibrary loans. Most Americans seem to understand that the recession is causing many institutions to tighten their belts and live with less. As I said, you can try using a library in a wealthier community that has not cut this service, but you need not resort to ad hominem attacks and calling people morons.

...
written by Lots to learn?, April 29, 2010
You also say that the US has "a lot to learn from Brazil and Mexico" in regards to immigration. Well, again, the immigration system in the US is a mixed picture, with both good and bad for illegal immigrants. Over 11 million illegal aliens find work in the US and struggle with certain hardships here because it still is a better deal than what they find at home. Brazil has far less illegal immigrants since it just doesn't offer the same opportunities for immigrants as the US. So you are comparing apples and oranges. But from the way I saw of how Brazil treats illegal Bolivians, locking them up in sweatshops, taking advantage of them, paying and treating them poorly, I can't imagine how the US has "a lot to learn" from Brazil. I saw none of the services and support networks for illegal immigrants so common to the US while in Brazil. This is another one of those fairy tales some Brazilians like to spin, making themselves the good guys and the US the bad guys. Brazilians seemed unaware of the plight of illegal immigrants there, or aware of the general struggle of immigrants in general. You just seem to be bent on showing that the US has lots to learn from Brazil, without really getting into the details. Show me the humane treatment of Brazil and Mexico toward immigrants.

Certainly the US, has a mixed policy of both taking advantage of illegal low-paid Mexican (and other) workers. They do the dangerous, dirty, and degrading work that most Americans don't wish to do for such low pay. Then, when times are bad (or even when they are good) many Americans complain bitterly about illegal immigrants. But you can't have it both ways: benefit from their low wages and yet not welcome them. So personally, I say God Bless the Mexicans who pick the crops that wind up on my table.

Yet on the other hand, even Mexican Americans will acknowledge that without certain limitations on migration, their own ability to organize unions and demand better wages is hampered. The UFW has been around since the 70s, but its greatest adversary is the countless farm workers who will work without the union and for lower pay.
I am personally for legalizing all current illegal immigrants, with some sort of greater limitation on future immigration and control of the borders. Like most Mexicans, I would prefer to see Mexico prosper so they did not have to even deal with sneaking across the border. Also, I don't have the data to back this up, but I tend to suspect that unlimited migration represses wages in certain industries that were once union. The meat packing industry is a well known case in point.

Most illegal immigrants are just simply hard working people trying to improve the lot of their family, much like past immigrants who came before them. This is the American story. So I do support them, within certain limits.

Yet, you say the US has "a lot to learn" from Brazil and Mexico, I would really like to know how? Again, you are tossing around wild generalizations, when in fact the picture is quite mixed. Despite certain negative attitudes by many Americans, the US system offers much to illegal immigrants, including access to public schools, healthcare (no one can be turned away from an emergency room), and other support networks, such as adult education classes, a vast array of bilingual services, free meals and help from food banks (google Mass Migrant, for an example), so the picture is not simply repression and hatred as many from South America would like to claim. In fact, a story yesterday in the New York Times points out that while Arizona has recently adopted repressive tactics that allow any police officer to demand proof of citizenship, this will not deter most illegal immigrants coming from Central America and Mexico because the abuse by the Mexican and Central American authorities in terms of robbing and exploiting them is far more harsh. And while the Mexican government complains vociferously about US abuse of migrants, Amnesty International cites them as far more abusive to illegal immigrants traveling to the US.
...
written by Lots to learn?, April 29, 2010
Yet, again, many people like yourself seem to favor the good-guys vs the bad-guys fairy-tale stories so this is not something South Americans are comfortable acknowledging. Note this telling report by Amensty International released this week on the treatment of illegal immigrants in Mexico traveling through to the US:

http://www.nytimes.com/2010/04/29/world/americas/29mexico.html?fta=y

Migrants start their treks in numerous countries and employ a dizzying array of schemes to slip across the border, making no two migrations the same. Mexicans, though, generally have it easier than Central Americans, who are often preyed upon by Mexican authorities even before reaching the increasingly fortified border.

“Riding precariously on the tops of freight trains (through Mexico), many are met with discrimination and xenophobia, targeted by people smugglers and prey to kidnapping by criminal gangs,” Amnesty International said in a report released this week.

“Every year (in Mexico) thousands of migrants are ill treated, abducted or raped,” the human rights group said. “Arbitrary detention and extortion by public officials are common.”

Mexico has been much more vociferous in criticizing the United States on immigration than in setting model practices itself, Amnesty International and other groups have found.

In Mexico, it is supposed to be federal immigration officers and the federal police who verify the legal status of migrants. But anybody with a badge is liable to do it, a situation that several migrants said prepared them well for what they might face in Arizona.


Of course this reporting by Amnesty International on the Mexican government's policy and treatment of immigrants doesn't fit with your black-white characterizations that demonize the US and praises all things Brazilian. Lots to learn from Mexico and Brazil? Both countries should learn to treat their own illegal immigrants with dignity before they go lecturing the US. In truth, Brazil seems incapable of supporting and respecting the diversity of people who came long ago as immigrants to Brazil. It has very few or even none of the services the US provides for immigrants. Brazil is not a dynamic and diverse society with the kind of substantial migrations that are characteristic of the US and EU. Most of the immigrants came long ago to Brazil. While the US remains a dynamic immigrant nation. If Brazil really was a model for human rights and treatment of illegal immigrants, I would sing its praise despite its troubles due to extreme inequality of wealth, but this is simply not the case. But many jingoistic Brazilians on this site are incapable of realistically assessing their country and the US. And much of it seems due to simple human envy and resentment, as well as the need to find a scapegoat for its problems, unfortunately.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

Ricardo: I could not help myself when I saw that news, and I had to bring this to your attention. This Breaking news headline called my attention, since yesterday they had a carton on one of New York City’s major newspapers saying: There were two people saying to each other look what the Barack Obama administration Space program came to. And in the picture you also see two people dressed like astronauts inside of the balloon basket ready to go up.

The symbols of American technology the space program is on its last leg with the Space Shuttle program finally achieving the goals that they had settled for that program to be reached by 1980. The Shuttle Space program is being phased out after some Shuttles blew up on the way up, and another blew up on re-entry, and they reached the goals of 1980. (That program is only 30 years behind schedule.)

Today, the US space program is in complete decline and NASA can’t be successful and has a hard time even to lift a balloon.

All the symbols of American capitalism, and economic system are falling down one after another: General Motors, Chrysler, the US space program, Wall Street, and so on…

When you connect the dots you know this is the end of an era, and it represents the slow death of another superpower.


*****


“Huge NASA Science Balloon Crashes in Australian Outback”
By Tarik Malik
SPACE.com Managing Editor
Space.com – Thursday, April 29, 2010

A huge NASA balloon loaded with a telescope painstakingly built to scan the sky at wavelengths invisible to the human eye crashed in the Australian outback Thursday, destroying the astronomy experiment and just missing nearby onlookers, according to Australian media reports…

http://news.yahoo.com/s/space/...ianoutback

.
...
written by don't see the problem, April 29, 2010
Personally I am not troubled at all by Obama's shutting reducing lunar missions. In fact, Obama increased the overall budget for NASA, but certain segments such as lunar missions are being phased out. No big deal to me. Seems quite cleaver. In the 60s, going to the moon was special, but what is the end-game of continuing missions to the moon now? It was always a questionable venture. How could we have vast swaths of poverty while we poured millions into moon missions. i know much technology came from the lunar missions, but it seems that rather than having spinoffs develop from lunar missions, we should be spending more on research for more pressing issues like global warming, reduction of oil dependence, etc. Obama has not done as much of this as much of this as I would like, but far more than Bush ever did. So, Chrysler and the lunar missions are falling to the side. Well, unless Chrysler can build a fuel efficient car of the quality of Toyota or Honda hybrids, then they SHOULD fall to the side. This is not tragedy, this is a good sign in my opinion. However, companies like Google, Apple, among others are continuing to do well because they produce relevant sophisticated technology.

Likewise, some might see the reduction of the US nuclear arsenal as a sign of the demise and collapse of the US empire. Well, I don't support the idea of empire, so I am not concerned about this. A nuclear arsenal is an obsolete symbol of the Cold War, which is over. We need cut the fat out of the bloated military budget and this is a good start. Moreover, Obama has a refreshing commitment to elminating nuclear weapons. Although it may not succeed in his lifetime, he is taking us in the right direction. This is one action that partly justifies his Nobel Prize nomination.
...
written by don't see the problem, April 29, 2010
Above I gave my opinion about immigration. I failed to mention that if limits need to be applied to the number of illegal migrant workers in the US, I am in favor of a policy that punishes corporations for hiring them, not criminalizing the individuals and harming and separating families. I think if they penalized the industries that hired illegal aliens without asking for documentations, this could be easily monitored. This would be far more effective and would be a more humane strategy than arresting and locking up individuals.
Yet from what I can tell, I am cynical that positive immigration reform will come, especially while 16 million Americans remain unemployed.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

James Hesson: Likewise, some might see the reduction of the US nuclear arsenal as a sign of the demise and collapse of the US empire. Well, I don't support the idea of empire, so I am not concerned about this. A nuclear arsenal is an obsolete symbol of the Cold War, which is over. We need cut the fat out of the bloated military budget and this is a good start. Moreover, Obama has a refreshing commitment to eliminating nuclear weapons.


*****


Ricardo: When Barack Obama and the Russian Prime Minister signed a new nuclear weapons agreement a few weeks ago – the right-wing media accused him of making the UA weaker, and Bhah, Bhah, Bhah…

In reality both countries the United States, and the Russians saw a good opportunity in getting rid off old and obsolete nuclear weapons that they still had around – stuff that were built long time ago and is obsolete technology when compared with the state-of-the-art weapons of today.

The old weapons probably still usable and would do a lot of damage like in the case of the 2 nukes that the US dropped on Japan at the end of WW II.

The reduction in nuclear weapons that they announced was probably one way of getting rid off the old stuff and still look good to the public to show that both countries are doing something to reduce their stockpile of nuclear weapons.

It was just a PR stunt more than anything else – a house clean up for both sides of obsolete stuff that they had on their inventories.

.
Correction
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

Ricardo: When Barack Obama and the Russian Prime Minister signed a new nuclear weapons agreement a few weeks ago – the right-wing media accused him of making the United States weaker, and Bhah, Bhah, Bhah…
.
Just a misspelling
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

Blah, Blah, Blah…
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

James Hesson: Personally I am not troubled at all by Obama's shutting reducing lunar missions. In fact, Obama increased the overall budget for NASA, but certain segments such as lunar missions are being phased out. No big deal to me.


*****


Ricardo: It is a big deal.

They had a special segment on the news a few weeks ago showing what is happening in communities that surround NASA in Florida. They were becoming ghost towns a having a profound impact in the local economy dlwith empty shopping malls, a ton of people trying to sell their houses and a real negative effect in the local economy – all because NASA is dismantling its staff and laying-off thousands of NASA scientists.

It is Pathetic what is happening to the US space program, and at the same time China is moving ahead and are developing the space weapons of the future, since they are not preparing themselves to fight a war of the past, but a war of the 21st century.

Today, the Russians are probably the leaders in space technology, and in the near future if the United States need to send an astronaut to the sky-lab then they will need to ask the Russians for a ride since the United States after the last Shuttle fight has lost its capabilities in even lifting an astronaut to the space lab.

That brings back to mind that cartoon that I saw on one of the New York newspapers a few days ago regarding NASA – showing the two American astronauts dressed as if they were going to space exploration, they were inside the basket of this hot air balloon and they were ready for their flight.

And there were two people watching and saying to each other just look what has happened to the US space program.

By the way, I believe that Brazil should keep advancing the space program in Brazil along with China.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

Ricardo: Anyway, what is going on today at Obama administration regarding NASA still is better than what was happening during the Bush administration.

George W. Bush (The Decider) decided that the United States should land a man in the Sun.

When he announced to the press his new space exploration plans some journalists said that could not be done.

George Bush replied immediately that after meeting with his closest cabinet advisors he had made a suggestion since he had figured out a solution for landing an American in the Sun – the solution was overy simple and all they had to do is to land the American astronaut in the Sun during the night.

.
...
written by don't see the problem, April 30, 2010
I never heard this joke about Bush, but clearly he was not the brightest bulb in the universe.

Yes, I have heard that people will lose jobs in Florida, but my point is that lunar missions are a symbolic goal of the past. Are they so essential? Job losses are always a hardship that should not be taken lightly, but investing in the lunar missions, in my opinion may be one of those industries like many in the military that would continue to propagate itself even if it is not in the interest of the US. We have been to the moon, and we found lots of dust..... let's move on....it is a very costly venture... right now when the US is cutting everything in sight including your interlibrary loans, I can't see why lunar missions are essential. I also don't agree with your characterization that the US is giving up on space research, especially in regards to strategic military projects. The cuts were to lunar missions, not to all NASA. The NASA budget in fact has increased. I don't take this as a bad sign, but a sign that Obama is not going to continue down the same path that was relevant 50 years ago in the Cold War, but not so much now. As I said, Chrysler and other corporations that do not innovate should go bankrupt. I still see great innovation in major companies like Google and Apple and other lesser known companies like Genetech or Applied Biosystems or other powerful research labs which still remains a relative strength the US maintains compared to China, and to a lesser extent, even the EU. Obsolete projects such as the bloated nuclear arsenal must be trimmed or eliminated. Again, this is a good sign in my opinion. Sure job loss is bad, but freeing up federal money that could be used for bio tech research for future productive practical technologies is money well spent.
...
written by don't see the problem, April 30, 2010
The United States has placed their big bets on ethanol made from corn and in Iraq as a new source of oil, and it will be very hard to turn the tide around on all the vested interests involved in these bets.


From what I understand, Iraq has not been the great source of oil imports that everyone has assumed. The contracts to oil companies have gone equally or more so to other foreign companies than American companies. Frankly, I think the war was a major miscalculation by Bush and in fact it cannot nor could it ever be justified to spend a trillion dollars there in hope of future oil trade. There are many theories as to why Bush went there, but one possible credible one is that Bush, like his father thought it would be an easy mission, and it would give him a bounce as a successful war president which seems to mean a lot to some Americans. I think the whole thing was a blunder.
...
written by .., May 01, 2010

Frankly, I think the war was a major miscalculation by Bush and in fact it cannot nor could it ever be justified to spend a trillion dollars there in hope of future oil trade.


Tell this to the countless Iraqi widows and orphans as well as to the American soldiers resting in peace in cemeteries spread all over the country. I am sure they as well as the tax payers would appreciate the trillions of dollars well spent on the "major miscalculation"!
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 01, 2010

James Hesson: From what I understand, Iraq has not been the great source of oil imports that everyone has assumed. The contracts to oil companies have gone equally or more so to other foreign companies than American companies. Frankly, I think the war was a major miscalculation by Bush and in fact it cannot nor could it ever be justified to spend a trillion dollars there in hope of future oil trade.


*****


Ricardo: I wrote many articles against the US going to war in Iraq. And now that the US spent trillions of US dollars in this fiasco – it looks even worse that they can’t even secure this source of oil for the United States.

About a week ago I saw the movie that got the Oscar for best picture “The Hurt Locker.”

It is absolutely insane to subject your young soldiers to that type of war day after day with no end in sight.

I am sympathetic to the Iraqi people, since if a foreign army attacked my country I would fight the occupying forces the same way the Iraqis are resisting the US occupation of their country. Plus all the collateral damage that was inflicted against the general population.

In my opinion, the US has no business attacking Iraq in the first place.

I bet the majority of people in Iraq today miss the time when Saddam Hussein was in power and there was more stability in their country.

The US foreign policy on the Middle East it does not make sense to me – since the self-interest of the United States is to import oil to keep the US economy moving along – and instead of been friend with all the Arab countries that are oil exporting countries (including Iran, I know they are Persians) – the US instead supports Israel that it is just a pain in the ass and cost a lot US taxpayer money.

What a dumb foreign policy if you ask me. The more I discuss this subject with very well educated friends of mine who are college professors, the more I bring to their attention the more they are asking each other what the United States has to gain from this crazy alliance with Israel that cost a lot taxpayer money and a lot of grief and nothing else.

The entire United States foreign policy related to the Middle East since the 1953, it has been a very sad comedy of errors with massive negative consequences to the people from Iraq, Iran, and so on…

In the other side of Iran, the United States is subjecting its soldiers to defend a very corrupt government in Afghanistan where the brother of the puppet president is a well-known narco-trafficker.

What a hell is the US army doing in Afghanistan, instead of packing their stuff and returning home?

It is easy to start a war, but very hard how to figure out how to end it.

.
Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 01, 2010

Maybe the Brazilian government space program can hire many of these scientists that NASA is laying off here in the USA, and they can help advance the Brazilian space program.

That would be fine with me.
.
Disponibilidade
written by Simpleton, May 01, 2010
Ricardo, what a marvelous idea you have come up with. Having become a laid off rocket scientist type just yesterday I'm instantly ready and available to jump in and help make Brasil a success in such endeavors. Both of my passions would be satisfied. I can't say I would agree do so for free but compared to here it would appear nearly so. Only need enough to get by in a more or less spartan lifestyle, nullify tax implications and cover the costs for two college educations, one here which I commited my future to ensuring some 18 years ago upon taking the child home from the hospital 2 days after birth to be as my own and one some years down the road from now there for a young very intellegent and studious favelado I deemed worthy of investing in the future for and started donating the resources neccessary to keep in private school and take additional course work / training. Other option would be to go work at picking up educator credentials and thence start up an after school school for a select few out of the poor and disadvantage to give them the opportunity to rise up and eventually break out of the mold no one else there in the tenuous middle class has the drive, dedication nor interest in the spirit of giving to do.

The more I think about it, I think I like the second approach. Being I only have about another 20 years to contribute getting things built up from within, seeing the fruition of my endeavors would be unlikely on the indigeonously developed Brasil based extraterrestrial visitation front. Setting up the program and doing individualized extracurricular training in mathematics, the sciences and engineering and providing mentoring for something like two to four years prior to obligatory military service I think would provide a decent chance / long run potential for me to produce Brasil's benevolent dictator of the future - might very well be what I end up most remembered for.
Reply to Simpleton
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 03, 2010

Ricardo: Did you work for NASA in Florida?

I am sorry to hear that you have lost your job, since the job market looks terrible right now – and I am afraid things are going to get even worse.

Brazil had a major set back on its space program in 2003 when many of its top space scientists died in that catastrophe when a rocket exploded – it takes a long time for Brazil to replace all the brain power that were lost on that accident.

Here is what I posted at the Elite Trader Forum on that subject 5 or 6 years ago.

Anyway, good luck with your new job search.


*****


In August 2003, Brazil had a major set back on its space program when a rocket exploded in the launching pad 3 days before was supposed to be lifted into space. It was a major catastrophe and a lot of people died in that accident.

The United States did not offered any help to the Brazilian government and the Brazilian government understand why – today the US can't help even themselves in matters of a space program; just look at the mess of the US Shuttle program.

The Russians came to the rescue of the Brazilian government, and the Russians helped the Brazilian scientists in that time of extreme need.

Brazil builds its own small and medium-size rockets that are launched from the Alcantara base in the northeastern state of Maranhao.

The base is considered an excellent launch site because it is located just 2.3 degrees south of the equator, the line at which the Earth moves the fastest, helping propel rockets into space with less fuel.


***


Most of this information had been posted on the website of the Brazilian space agency.

November 22, 2004

…The perspectives of the Russian-Brazilian cooperation in the sphere of space exploration have been outlined the in 1997 intergovernmental agreement "On cooperation in peaceful research and exploration of outer space."

According to Mr. Perminov, Brazil is willing to establish close cooperation with Russia in this sphere. "I would mention in this case objective and subjective factors. Objectively, Russia and the United States are two space superpowers. However, at the tragic time of the 2003 VLS-1 rocket explosion at the space center in Alcantara (Brazil), Russia was the only country to extend a helping hand to Brazilian colleagues," the head of Roskosmos emphasized.

Russian specialists worked at the site of the incident. They came up with a series of solutions and presented them to the Brazilian side. Brazilian experts decided that safety recommendations presented by Russian specialists were the most acceptable both in technical and financial terms. The Russian Federal Space Agency had also outlined several technical and organizational solutions that helped the Brazilians to start immediately the reconstruction of the space center and make relevant corrections in the design of the VLS rocket.

"All our recommendations were considered the most optimal by the Brazilian side," Mr. Perminov stressed.


*****


Saturday, August 23, 2003

Brazil's president said Saturday his country's space program remains a priority despite a rocket explosion that killed 21 people, injured 20 and put a fiery end to Brazil's third attempt to enter space.

The 66-foot-high VLS-1 VO3 rocket was three days from its scheduled liftoff when an explosion Friday destroyed it and its box-like launch pad.

The blast at the Alcantara Launch Center in northeastern Brazil killed mostly civilian technicians and destroyed two research satellites, dealing a serious blow to Brazil's nascent space program…
.
Brazilian independence is from “foreign oil” - And not from oil.
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 03, 2010

Ricardo: I want to clarify one point for the readers of Brazzil magazine.

Brazilian independence is from “foreign oil” - And not from oil.

Bill Maher on his HBO program said something that gave the impression that he thinks Brazil got independence from oil.

It is a great achievement for the Brazilian economy to reduce its dependence on imported foreign oil from 90 percent of its internal needs in Brazil in 1973, to becoming 100 percent independent from imported foreign oil in 2006.

It is a great feeling to know that your country is not dependent on imported oil, and it is also good for the countries economy.

I said on my article: “During the oil shock of the 1970’s Brazil imported from foreign sources about 90 percent of its oil needs in Brazil, and in 2010 Brazil is an oil exporting country.

…The generals and their dictatorship system put in place the foundations that made Brazil use home-grown sugar cane as a source of energy independence. And here is a lesson about “oil self-sufficiency” from Brazil to the United States: "Brazil imported around 90 percent of its oil needs in the 1970s, but turned itself into a net exporter of oil in 2006."

Brazilian independence from foreign oil

April 21, 2006 marked an end to decades of Brazilian dependence on foreign oil, and fuel bills that plunged Brazil into debt when oil prices soared in the 1970s. On that date President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva flipped the switch on a new oilrig that will usher in overall Brazilian independence from foreign oil.”

***

On the comments section of the article I said:

“In a NUTSHELL: The United States imported 45 per cent of its oil needs in 1973 at the time of the global oil shock.

And 37 years later, in 2010 the United States will be importing 60 per cent of its oil needs. In 2010 the United States is more dependent than ever on imported oil.”

By importing so much oil from foreign lands the United States is transferring part of its wealth to the oil producing countries to the tune of hundreds of billions of US dollars.

Here is some information I just found in the web about oil and ethanol in Brazil.


*****


As for oil:

According to NationMaster.com, Brazil is the eighth largest consumer of oil in the world burning 2.372 million barrels a day. That places them ahead of Canada, Saudi Arabia, South Korea, Mexico, France, Great Britain, Italy, and Spain.

Furthermore, according to the CIA, Brazil is the thirteenth largest producer of oil in the world putting them ahead of Iraq, Kuwait, Algeria, Nigeria, Angola, Libya, and Great Britain.

As for offshore activities, our Energy Information Administration claims the vast majority of Brazil's huge reserves are indeed offshore:

According to the Oil and Gas Journal (OGJ), Brazil had 12.6 billion barrels of proven oil reserves in 2009, second-largest in South America after Venezuela. The offshore Campos and Santos Basins, located on the country's southeast coast, contain the vast majority of Brazil's proven reserves. In 2008, Brazil produced 2.4 million barrels per day (bbl/d) of oil, of which 76 percent was crude oil. Brazil's oil production has risen steadily in recent years, with the country's oil production in 2008 about 150,000 bbl/d (6 percent) higher than 2007. Based on its September 2009 Short-Term Energy Outlook, EIA forecasts Brazilian oil production to reach 2.61 million bbl/d in 2009 and 2.81 million bbl/d in 2010. Brazil's oil consumption averaged 2.52 million bbl/d in 2008. As a result of this rising oil production and flat consumption growth, EIA expects that Brazil will become a net oil exporter in 2009.

As for ethanol:

Brazil is one of the largest producers of ethanol in the world and is the largest exporter of the fuel. In 2008, Brazil produced 454,000 bbl/d of ethanol, up from 365,000 in 2007. All gasoline in Brazil contains ethanol, with blending levels varying from 20-25 percent. Over half of all cars in the country are of the flex-fuel variety, meaning that they can run on 100 percent ethanol or an ethanol-gasoline mixture. According to ANP, Brazil also produced about 20,000 bbl/d of biodiesel in 2008, and the agency has enacted a three-percent blending requirement for domestic diesel sales.

If gasoline blends are currently using 20-25 percent ethanol in Brazil, that means 75 to 80 percent is gasoline. And, if diesel only requires 3 percent ethanol, 97 percent is NOT ethanol.

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/n...otally-oil
.
Jamie Hiss
written by fried CHC, May 03, 2010


You’re right, English is not my first language!

How about you…. What is perhaps your second, third, or maybe fourth language?

Americans… They Don't Know What They Want, But They Are Ready To Bite Somebody To Get It… Ok Jamie, you can bite me now.


Costinha
...
written by strange, May 04, 2010
Costinha, I have no desire to bite, or attack anyone here or elsewhere. Strangely, however, I read your posts, and you are typically spewing some of the nastiest ad hominem attacks, and rarely contributing with thoughtful replies, criticism or responses. So you chastise me for criticizing you? I was trying to point out that I didn't understand you. I respect that English is not your first language, and unlike many Brazilians I met who would routinely laugh at my poorly spoken Portuguese, I do not think it appropriate to laugh at people who make mistakes speaking a language that is not their native tongue. Yet, after one nasty comment after another, I may have sounded insensitive, but it seems ironic that you would even complain of being offended when your style is to dump bitter and nasty ad hominem attacks. Strange.
...
written by strange, May 04, 2010
Ricardo, my initial objection to your article was that it made melodramatic claims ("lots to learn", "Titanic sinking", "no hope in sight", etc) about the demise of the US, while gloating about the Brazil, the "nation of the future", etc. Also, I was dumfounded, like most, about your praise for the dictatorship, since mostly Brazilians like blame everything bad on them, as well as the US for supporting them, without considering how in fact, it was primarily Brazilians who are complicit in the dictatorship, since accepted them.


Your tone changes here, and I find it more acceptable in the last post: I agree, the US needs to reduce oil dependence. It is a serious problem for many reasons. Yet, I don't see Brazil as the model for the US to follow. And your comment that the US has "lots to learn" is too simplistic.
I spoke with someone the other day who was familiar with the research of Amyris Bio fuels in the US. They are doing a project that is based on cooperation with the US and Brazil, and part of this research is developing a bacteria that will greatly improve the efficiency of ethanol produced from sugar cane, which is something that would clearly benefit Brazil. Which makes me think you are writing about a topic in which you have little expertise. So such sweeping generalizations about Brazil teaching the US are not correct. The relation is more complex. Clearly, there are certain projects that will benefit both countries, and such jingoistic claims so common to this site, don't capture the actual relation between the US and Brazil.

Reply to James Hesson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 04, 2010

James Hesson: Yet, I don't see Brazil as the model for the US to follow. And your comment that the US has "lots to learn" is too simplistic.


*****


Ricardo: You are overreacting to something that I did not say.

I mentioned above that I did submit the above article with the following title:
“Brazil and the New Economic Miracle of the 21st Century”

The editor of Brazzil magazine changed the title to: “Brazil and the New Economic Miracle. The US Has a Lot to Learn!”

If you have been reading my articles and my postings then you would know that I am against exporting ethanol from Brazil to any other country around the world – and that the ethanol as part of the energy solution it is good only for Brazil.

I am aware that the biotech companies are coming up with new technologies that are improving even further the ratio of ethanol from sugar cane as compared with ethanol from corn, and the ratio has been improving from 10-1 to 12–1 and 14-1.

It is silly to even contemplate that ethanol is an energy solution for the United States. In my opinion, the energy solution for the United States is in nuclear technology, and in electric cars, and so on…

The US oil industry is becoming a basket case, and you don’t need to look further than the catastrophe that is underway in the coast of the United States.

I believe that nuclear technology is also part of the energy solutions for Brazil.

Anyway, about 2 years ago I wrote a few words regarding that subject and I posted it on the Elite Trader Economics Forum as follows:


*********


June 18, 2008

SouthAmerica: President Lula of Brazil must be happy right now, since he has been calling for the US to drop its tariff of $ 54 cents per gallon on ethanol.

I am against Brazil exporting ethanol to other countries – ethanol worked well for Brazil, but that is a partial energy solution for Brazil and in my opinion should not be exported to other countries around the world. As a matter of fact Brazil should adopt a high tax on ethanol for the export market to discourage the export of ethanol from Brazil.

The Bush administration in concert with the US mainstream media are calling for the lift on regulations about offshore oil drilling in the coast of the US and they also want to explore for oil all over Alaska.

After the oil shock of the 1970’s a country has to be very DUMB not to do something about its dependency on foreign oil. And after such oil crisis like the one in the 1970’s it was not enough to wake up a country such as the US and 30 years later the US is even more dependent than ever on foreign oil – what can I say?

What kind of superpower let itself been caught with its pants down and be so vulnerable to the point that it is laughable?

I understand that the United States is crisis prone country and that Americans just react when it is too late and a problem has skyrocketed or are ready to explode and at that point Americans overreact and they make bad decisions trying to fix the latest mess.

That has been the global perception for many years of the new American way…. And today Americans look lost – running around like chickens without a head.

Americans look lost in Iraq, in Afghanistan, during the Katrina crisis, during the sub-prime mess, during the current oil crisis, and the list could go on and on….

Since the Clinton administration left town in January of 2001, the US has had in the last 8 years the most incompetent group of people running the United States since 1776.

The incompetent Jackasses drum up the US energy policy in the basement of the Whitehouse when Jackass # 2 Dickhead Cheney cooked up some secret deals that became the new energy policy of the US and then they adopted the crap that Cheney cooked up with his pals – these idiots decided to increase the average car mileage in the US by 2 miles per gallon by 2011.

I remember reading the detail of the new energy policy that was being adopted and thinking at the same time what kind of fools and idiots we have running this country.

Anyway, the s**t has hit the fan and once more Americans are running around like chickens without a head – and as usual the American mainstream media is missing in action.

I am afraid that reacting as usual on their panic mode Americans might decide to drop the tariff on imported ethanol from Brazil.

In my opinion, that it would be a very bad move with negative economic effects on both countries.
.
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, May 05, 2010

Anyway, the s**t has hit the fan and once more Americans are running around like chickens without a head – and as usual the American mainstream media is missing in action.


Not very different from what is happening here!!!
Jamie Hiss - Strange
written by fried CHC, May 05, 2010


You’re getting stranger by the minute… If truth is stranger than fiction, then you must be the truth.

I either losing your shingles or you need some serious clitoris stimulation.

Hehehe


Costinha
smilies/grin.gif
...
written by strange, May 05, 2010
Ricardo, I find it so interesting that the editor of this rag would have you change your title to something more like a tabloid, and how was I to know you "did not say it". If you authorized the editor to make such a change, then in effect, you did say so:

I mentioned above that I did submit the above article with the following title:
“Brazil and the New Economic Miracle of the 21st Century”

The editor of Brazzil magazine changed the title to: “Brazil and the New Economic Miracle. The US Has a Lot to Learn!”


I guess they are more interested in seeing this rag as some kind of voice piece for spewing vitriol against the US. The weird thing about this blog is that it seems like it has the potential to be a format for serious discussion between individuals who are concerned about important global issues, especially between our countries. Yet, when you tell me the editors added this phrase (US has lots to learn from Brazil) it makes me think they are like the engineers of crappy TV shows like the Jerry Springer show where they coach the contestants to come out with the nastiest slander of the other party just to start fight. It's kind of pathetic, and yet one more reason for me to not want to visit here anymore. The people who write on this blog are from Left and Right wing perspectives, yet one thing they have in common is the continuous ranting against the US. This only makes me wonder what the editors contrive and what the authors really believe. Rather than an interesting site for discussion, ore and more this blog reminds me of a bar where you meet the same miserable confused drunks who are always there ready to tell the same rambling angry story. They are mostly belligerent and disenchanted with the world, and they have little ability to listen since mostly they just want to tell the same incoherent rant that they have been spinning for years.

Since the Clinton administration left town in January of 2001, the US has had in the last 8 years the most incompetent group of people running the United States since 1776.

No disagreement there: the US was hijacked by dangerous hateful narrow-minded, jingoistic, greed-driven boneheaded fools.
...
written by strange, May 05, 2010
Ricardo: why is it "silly" for the US to contemplate ethanol as an alternative fuel? I in fact agree that ethanol and many other alternative fuels as well as gains in making technology more fuel efficient will have a dramatic effect in time on US oil dependence.

I think safe nuclear could be part of this picture, along with wind, solar, and a variety of other alternative energies. I only wish Obama would have attacked the issue of alternative energy (and global warming) with the same intensity as FDR did when he harnessed the industrial strength of the US to fight unemployment in the Depression as well as arm the allies by producing armaments. In other words, as a solution to both unemployment and the problem of oil dependence and global warming, the Federal government could create jobs much like FDR devoted to new and clean technology. Obama doesn't seem to have the political will or audacity to do this. there are countless abandoned factories and mills in the US that could be converted and retooled to build wind turbines for example, but this is not happening. Obama, unfortunately is a centrist. He finds the place where Americans are in the center, and he aims for that center. I think ideologically he is more to the Left, but he is a very practical politician bent on survival. Unfortunately, the Right wing base (birthers, Tea party, etc) is on the move, but the Left is complacent and not interested in challenging Obama. They want to support him as he is attacked by the Right, but they fail to push for any substantial change such as the public option or serious job creation.
...
written by strange, May 05, 2010
ethanol from sugarcane is impractical for the US, but some other crop (not the less efficient corn ethanol) could come to fruition. The US has vast swaths of unused farms that the government even pays to have kept as farm land. Although ethanol will never amount to a significant source of energy, it will make a contribution.

We also need to invest more heavily into extensive public transportation systems much like the Europeans. The choice for car culture and highways makes no sense considering the oil dependence issue. Most Americans would like to use less oil (gas) but they have little choice but to drive a car. The auto industry took the US in this direction years ago, and they work hard through lobbyist to maintain their dominance. But times are changing: more and more Americans understand the cost of oil dependence, and global warming. For years, the US automakers resisted making smaller more efficient cars like the Asian companies, since they could make more money selling big-ass gas-guzzling inefficient monster trucks and SUVs. I could care less that they came near to bankruptcy: for years they made no innovations in fuel efficient cars such as the Prius. I wouldn't buy an American car because I don't want to encourage their arrogant and foolish practices. i won't buy one until they design cars that are fuel efficient.
...
written by strange, May 07, 2010
from what I can see, Brazil is going down the same path as the US in terms of privileging cars above mass transit. The endless traffic jams and congestion makes commuting to long miserable experience. While the US Congress was lobbied heavily by auto industry back in the 50s to create an extensive highway system while simultaneously dismantling an extensive mass transit system (buses, trolleys, trains), I don't understand why Brazil would make the same dumb choice 60 years later. I am guessing the auto industry has a similar influential lobbying machine as they do in the US. Improved mass transit is something both Brazil and the US have a lot to learn about. Looking to the EU would be a good start.
Learning from Brazil
written by Bob Malone, June 24, 2010
I have been in Brazil for three years. The level in society I am at in Brazil says to me when people retire and receive pensions that by even European standards are high for many government workers somebody has to end up paying for this.

The public education system is so bad and without academic disipline with poor desire to learn, and Brazil's growing population has to lead to problems down the road.


...
written by Ian , September 01, 2010
Many countries offer a lot. From the distance of where I live, and I AM aware of the GDP PP of Brazil and its commercial place in the world, however it is situated in a very prime position with lots or mineral wealth in a vast country with nearly 200 million people - it SHOULD be doing ok - however it is not doing as good as it should when you analyse its capacity to do better - personally I cant see it becoming a world power ever, the dyas of COUNTRIES becoming world powers is coming to a close - the day of the corporation is almost upon us - corporations tnascend national boundaries, commercial policy has always been the driving force for coutries that have created wealth and assumed power, that era is now behind us. The corporate infrastructures that have world wide clout will bring an interesting scenario to individual social wealth over the next half century. Brazil has already missed it's opportunity - the US and ESPECIALLY a united Europe will continue to dominate, with China fading as internal infrastructure requirements on an annual requirment, will in the short AND long term be too big an issue for the Chinese to sustain growth when their GDP PP catches up or gets close to western standards - too many people then but UNLIKE Brazil they would have created a POSSIBLE sustainable future - with ongoing difficulty. I am Australian and with high growth, low unemployemnt excellent GDP PPP in a large isolated land with a VERY small ( about the same as greater New York City) population, in the changing world in which we find ourselves I would prefer to be here for MANY reasons - life style - personal wealth creation oportunities - enjoyed democracy and personal liberties and freedoms - a high standard of living on a par with the USA and the Major economies of Europe - KEEP BRAZIL ..KEEP THE USA ..KEEP EUROPE ...KEEP CHINA ...give me the BEST PLACE .....here in the deep south!

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack