Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33083995

Who's Online

We have 738 guests online



Mr. Amaral, the Military Regime You So Much Admire Shouldn't Be Allowed to Rule Over Brazil PDF Print E-mail
2010 - April 2010
Written by Sam Paris   
Wednesday, 28 April 2010 03:27

Brazilian presidents Lula and Cardoso This piece is a rebuttal to an article written by Ricardo C. Amaral   titled "The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship" and published by Brazzil Magazine. How preposterous of you to suggest that the viable solution for Brazil's social, political and legal ailments can only be found in a guns-and-fist military regime.

I may be mistaken Mr. Amaral, but from what I read in your article it would appear you are a direct descendant of the Parasitical Ruling Elites that ruled Brazil since its inception as nation. If so, you are direct descendant of those who raided the country's wealth, peddled its natural resources and have ultimately mortgaged the future of a nation.

Fortunately for Brazil and all Brazilians, the looting sooner or later had to come to an end and to some degree it did when those self - proclaimed benefactors lost their power. Nevertheless; what was left of Brazil was a carcass of nation of which poor inhabitants and a large number of the unfortunate underclass survived as social and political scavengers.

Still, given the resilience of our great nation, it refused to succumb to its last breath and at every tiny patch of hope it found enough vital signs to wiggle and squirm amid gasps and spurts; valiantly trying to get back life. And to rise from its ashes and live and prosper as it should Brazil had to confront decades of struggles, year after year of false starts until the country finally emerged from the shadows of hyper inflation and chronic economic stagnation. And in the last decade it found the strength at last. It recouped its breath and rediscovered its stamina to stand unsupported on its own feet.

But as is common with any recovering, moribund, near death patient whose health has somehow been miraculously improved, one has to expect that the social and political state of the nation doesn't check out with a hundred percent clean bill of health. And the long, hard stages of recovery are marred with the ever present danger of a relapse. During that critical period of national reinvigoration there would naturally be many critical situations in which the outcome is often in doubt.

That's precisely what is happening to the great, resource rich nation of Brazil. And just as the country begins to show signs that's fit, ready; signs that it's willing and able to get out of life support and step on the world stages as a heavyweight, along appears a certain Mr. Amaral professing with messianic enthusiasm his desire to resuscitate those self - serving humanoids from their cryptic political/military graveyards, so the goons can once again cannibalize the hard - earned destiny of our nation.

Dictatorship in Brazil has been dead Sir. And it has been dead long ago. But you, sensing an opportunity to seize the moment you concoct this preposterous idea that to save Brazil from itself you must attempt to turn back the pages of its history by raising it from the dead.

By suggesting that a Coup d'état is the best medium to fix Brazil's broken social order you are simply aiming to restore - at all cost - the power the Ruling Elite once held but eventually lost. Losing power and the prestige it yields it's s a bitter pill to swallow. Indeed it is! But you see; every sophisticated, intellectually advanced and politically evolved Brazilian knows that your proposed cure for crime and lawlessness in Brazil is as good as you getting a cancer cure prescription from a snake oil salesman.

However, and not surprisingly, in your delusion you failed to include - or you seem to have intentionally lost sight of - the one single axiomatic factor that causes the social and economic stability of a nation and assures its rise to the top.

Assuming my gumption is correct; let me lay it out for you.

The past two Centuries have seen most Western European nations and the United States - Brazil's colossal North American neighbor - prosper like no other time in human history. Their unimpeded upward growth allowed their societies to advance and become what we know today as 'the rich and developed world.'

Quiz: what exactly triggered their unobstructed rise to the pinnacle of power and prestige Mr. Amaral? Well for your information, it was their unwavering commitment to Democracy, their iron - grip hold on the concept of justice for all and their efficiency in meting out justice according to equitable rule of law.

Now get this.

The unprecedented advancement these free Western Powers experienced also created an interesting paradox. To protect their own interests, their well - earned power and political clout gave them the ability to plunder, subjugate, dictate or otherwise impose their will - at will - on most other nations around the globe. Brazil included.

Most interesting of all, nearly all nations that the Western Powers colonized were poor, underdeveloped nations whose rulers, at one time or another, were dictators and self-serving one-man show - presiding over their unconstrained by law: - one party regimes. (The same type of despotic force d'état regime that ruled Brazil from 1960s to 80s.)

And in spite your glowing allegory titled 'The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship' you shamefully and willfully omit that during its dictatorship period, Brazil - although one the most beautiful and resource-rich nation in the world, territorially larger than the United States - has nonetheless spent most of its national tenure reduced to the role of a mendicant nation. And that the tyrannical system of governance you endorse contributed to Brazil being elevated to that unflattering status of a Third World Nation.

It should pain you Mr. Amaral to know that for most of the past century Brazil has spent large chunks of its history behaving as a political and social scavenger in the eyes of the world. Indeed, it's hard to imagine an enormous, continent-size nation as Brazil kissing up to foreign economic, social and military powers just to keep economically afloat.

But Brazil's hand-to-mouth approach was the only form of diplomatic clout it had at its disposition. At best, when viewed from abroad, Brazil's most notable social and economic achievements were in boasting an unmatched record at building slums (the favelas). Not to mention that it holds the record as the number one producer of the world's largest incomes disparity of modern times.

Yes Sir! Again, we are not talking about Zaire, Congo, Haiti or Iraq here. We are talking about Brazil...a country that, soccer artistry and G - string notwithstanding; possessed (and possesses) the capacity to send a man to the moon at the same time the United States landed their men there. And were it not for the corrupt military rulers constantly raiding the cookie jar, Brazil could have been there already.

Further still, a democratic Brazil Mr. Amaral, should have launched its own space program to reach Mars and beyond decades ago. It could have by now littered the world with its own multinational 500 corporations. It could have developed its home - grown automobile industry.

It should have built its bullet trains; it should have peppered the skies with Embraer built stealth fighters Jets and strategic bombers. And instead of buying one nuclear submarine from a much smaller nation like France, its Navy could by now have its self-engineered fleet of advanced nuclear submarines defending our vast, sunny and beach adorned shores or prowling the open seas.

Also, as a wholesome military power, its entire Navy and Air Force should be in the position to strike fear in the hearts of those who'd so much dare to make a play for Brazil's new found oil wealth. While at that, like the mighty United States of America, Brazil could be drawing respect and awe from friends and allies.

Let me also mention that in the nuclear theater, instead of having to rely on a strategic defense alliance with a smaller and yet more economically and technologically advanced nation like France, Brazil could - much like the United States - have become a hyper power capable of rubbing its nuclear awesomeness and prowess in the world's nose. (Just so you know, the United States - the most powerful nation in the known universe - is a DEMOCRACY.)

Wait! Before you go, let me add that Brazil could also by now be in the position to unabashedly broadcast its superpower DEMOCRATIC credentials around the world. An attribute that could have ultimately fitted its famous and fabled bikini read end tightly in its rightful permanent seat at the UN.

However, when it comes to that, the opposite is true. It has to lie in wait as an outsider that it is, hoping to get in. It may get the door opened and finally sit on its coveted UN chair. But if it does, it's only because the advent of the Mr. Lula da Silva has seen Brazil come through to move past its hemispheric identity as the 'America's backyard.'

But as we speak, our multicolor and multi-ethnic nation is still waiting to be accepted (if it behaves responsibly) in that exclusive club of nations who holds their permanent seats at the UN.

Guess what! To achieve that sought-after prize Brazil has to show that its peoples have the attribute, knowledge, or skills that can only be associated to that of a forward-looking and sophisticated society. An achievement that's only possible through advanced EDUCATION. Its population and its population's children and its children's children must exhibit the telltale signs that they belong in the ranks of the highly schooled and that they deserve a place among the socially and technologically mature run of humanity. And that its entire populace (and not just a small band of privileged kids) have access to and are permitted to attend the best universities for the betterment of their lives and for the stratospheric rise of their nation.

Which at this juncture, I ask: can you step forward and for the record claim that other than producing inefficient bureaucrats, greed lawyers; ego-justice judges, frolicking accountants, corrupt politicians; incompetent doctors and nepotistic beneficiary of the country's best business available opportunities; the military regimes of yore have produced a first-class social, intellectual and technologically ripe nation we call Brazil? I think not!

Just look around carefully Mr. Amaral and take note of how most of the Brazilian population has survived as peddlers and scalpers in the underground economy and become aware of what has led the disenfranchised to become petty criminals to the point where the most entrepreneurial among them, at best, have made themselves CEO drug dealers. (And that dysfunctional and unsavory social crop, I remind you, sprouted under the careful, benevolent watchful eyes of your so-called benign dictators.)

History shows that each of your large-hearted authoritarian system in Brazil (and the world for that matter), rose to power for their own welfare. And for as long as they were permitted to, they transferred power and control not to the people but to their subsequent self-serving parasitical cronies. And under their nepotic arrangement, one to ten percent of their paisanos usually ended up snapping up ninety percent of the nation's wealth for themselves.

Overtly and more often covertly they shared that power, wealth, resources, land and territories among their pals and close associates. Whatever was left they pawned it to powerful foreign political compadres in exchange for prestige, overseas education and economic opportunities for their families, children and closest geopolitical allies.

As their power - sharing and swapping orgy went on, they were wise enough to keep the poor purposely uneducated...and the less affluent in a compliant state of blatant ignorance and submission. And under the threat of possible use of force they coaxed the upper-middle class to acquiesce in a semi-permanent, moronic state of dazed political social stupor.

Thus most Brazilians for most of Brazil's existence, have been kept out of the loop and to this day millions are still fair game; easy prey and prone to the present whims of a small but pervasive ruling elite that still plague Brazil. Millions can do nothing but pray that God or some form of higher power will eventually manifest and deliver them from their day slave-like sub existence.

Contrast that with Sweden for instance. Sweden is a country ridiculously small and with the end of the Cold War it has become a strategically insignificant nation of 9 million or so. In Europe, its economy is only the tenth largest and in the Global sphere its economy ranks in double digits way below in the pecking order and scope at 22nd.

And yet Sweden boasts one of the world's highest educational standards in the world and its educational system - from pre-school to Universities - is AVAILABLE FOR ALL regardless of background, gender, social and national origin.

In fact Sweden's social development and technological know-how and productivity are one of the worlds' highest...and towers miles above Brazil's. At that, I will have you know that Sweden - despite its rubber stamp and post card royalty - is a DEMOCRACY.

And speaking of technology, even Israel is more advanced than Brazil. (Israel too is a democracy.) By contrast, Brazil, despite being an enormous, continent-size nation; it has reached a technological progress mark where the numbers of its patents recognition are less or on a par to that of Pakistan. And its living standard index although rising, is lower than or equal to that of Vietnam's or Nigeria. Let's call it 'vestiges of Brazil's Benevolent Dictatorship'

Again, it's all thanks to that self-serving parasitical ruling elite. Many would not be surprised as to why you are advocating their return to power.

Now, what you may not know is: Brazil has closer to 200 million inhabitants and yet only one man among its citizens tops Forbes billionaire list. (His wealth by the way or his access to it was probably achieved mostly or in great part because his well-connected father was an energy minister in the country.)

So to you and all the secretly aspiring dictators out there I ask: where are the Bill Gates of Brazil, Sir? Where are the Dell's, the Steven Jobs, and the Einstein? Where are its Nobel laureates? Can you find them among the military rulers you wish to return to power?

Let me tighten it up a notch and ask: Where's Brazil's Space Station? Where can you find Brazil's giant and acclaimed film industry? Where are Brazil's MacDonald's and Starbucks? Why is Embraer today only the third largest aircraft manufacture in the world (a position which by the way, it reached only after the introduction of our current democratic system), instead of competing toe-to-toe with Airbus and Boeing?

Why isn't Brazil's culture and language widespread and in day-to-day use around the world like say, English and French is? After all Brazil is the fifth largest country in the world, isn't it, Mr. Amaral? And say, have you read or heard news lately that to protect itself and the oil wealth found in its territorial waters Brazil will need to buy advanced fighter jets from either France, the USA or God-forbid, Sweden? Yes, Sweden, that lame and insignificant patch of land I mentioned a moment ago has enough military capacity to help protect BRAZIL. You go figure!

Now, shouldn't Brazil be the country selling military airpower to them and racking in the billions of dollars to its treasury and in turn invest the funds in the advancement of its society instead?

Can a military dictatorship deliver all that muscle to Brazil before 2020? O and when do you think Brazil will have its first black President?

To their credit, Brazilians are known as one of the happiest people in the world. But as I watch from overseas I see millions of Brazilian faces displaying that picture of unrelenting poverty and ignorance. And when they smile; most of them flash rotten, brown and broken teeth-smiles.

That may seem trivial to you Mr. Amaral. But to me and to most people in the developed world, a beautiful, sparkling white teeth flashing through the smiles of a population is a big and clear sign they belong to a developed society. A society like Sweden's that can provide something as basic adequate dental care to its citizens.

Now do you remember seeing the face of the average Brazilian display their unusual joy underscored by a shiny white smile that showcased well-cared for teeth...specially during the twenty one years of dictatorship they suffered? If they couldn't provide something as general as high-quality dental care, how in the world would such dictatorial regime provide the A-list educational and first-world living standard that's necessary and primary to combat poverty and ward off crime?

Au contraire! Still today, the faces of most Brazilians are but a sad portrait of hardship and injustice. And when that average Brazilian speaks, he or she sounds like a bicameral man on the verge of mental retardation.

On the bright side - and thanks to president Lula and his predecessor -  Brazil may have finally found its footing. But one question remains. As Brazil readies itself for further economic growth and ascent to power Dom, where are the hordes upon hordes of advanced engineers it so desperately needs to support its rapid transformation?

You may not have noticed but the nation's infrastructure is a sham. Power grid failure, collapsing bridges, toppling shopping centers and flash floods in high-density urban centers is the norm. Brazil's last dictators had a twenty-one year the chance to fix all that. They didn't. They couldn't and they didn't know how. And when they did know how, they did nothing about it.

That's because back then, they were incapable of doing anything of meaningful value to the nation. And as far as defending Brazil from potential outside aggression, they were as endowed as were the dictators of Argentina that defended her during the Falkland War. You know the rest of the story, don't you?

That's why a Democratic Brazil of today is nothing short of a miracle. Perhaps God is indeed a Brazilian. But there's no doubt that there's much change needed in Brazil. Not change that replaces one flawed system of governance with another. I am talking about top to bottom sustained change.

But to change all that Brazil needs a highly educated working force. Since it doesn't have it, the bulk of know-how it requires has to be imported. And thus; as it was with its recent history, the best jobs in the country when not going to those politically, militarily or economically connected, are deeded over to foreign brain-power.

Indeed, the top jobs at Brazilian companies are reserved to top CEO's with foreign names. The locals, the vast majority of men and women born and bred in the country lack the (technical) knowledge and skill required to do something. Thus they continue to get by as perennial serving maids and quintessential modern day foot servants of those foreign guests that can.

Get a grip Mr. and answer these questions: Where are the great financial geniuses and bankers that regardless of the tone of their skin and their background that in the past two decades would have built in Brazil a financial system to rival or surpasses Wall Street? Meanwhile, it was a foreign financial institution; Banco Santander of Spain to be precise, that launched the biggest IPO to date in the countries' history.

Are you saying that a bunch of military power-grabbing crooks were and are capable of delivering that to our nation as called for in your formula for Brazil's success?

C'mon!

I've lived outside of Brazil for more than 30 years. Before I left, the major and most influential TV Network in the country at the time (which by the way was in bed with the military dictatorship) was TV Globo. And all it did THEN was to feed regime-doctored ignorance and pathetic programming to the population...to keep them happy.

Thirty plus on, and still, the vast majority of the population are being fed the SAME archaic, brain shriveling TV programming.

Thanks but, no thanks!

Instead of dictators, what Brazil needs is its own CNN (and TV anchors that - like the vast majority of Brazilians - need to learn to speak Portuguese in an educated and affluent manner.) That too Sir, I once again remind you, is acquired through an unhinged commitment to higher and available-for-all education of the masses. But when it comes to education as springboard to upward mobility, one aspect of the legacy left behind by your benevolent strongman and I am sure you are well aware of is: in Brazil, the browner your skin tone gets the less likely it is that your face will be seen inside Brazil's corridors of business, political and social power. In fact, the browner your skin the more likely your face will appear on the crime section of periodicals or as prominent feature on prime time Brazil's Network Evening News.

Social and economic injustice is the hotbed and the fertilizers of crime and lawlessness in Brazil. It operates in stealth and the line separating it from the dearth of the ruling elite is as thin as it is invisible. Here's an example: When at the preteen age of eleven (and before leaving Brazil for good) I worked as a courier for a Law Firm somewhere located near Avenida Paulista in downtown São Paulo.

The firm sent me on an errand to deliver some legal documents to a retail store. When I entered the store in a plush district around Avenida Ipiranga, I suffered the unjust humiliation that often comes with being and looking different. 'I was thrown out of the store simply because of the tone of my skin.' And I was at work mind you. This blatant form of racial and social discrimination happened to a simple, albeit well-dressed boy with big dreams of becoming somebody or making something of himself in the future.

Noticed that I was barely eleven years of age and was working with hope and dignity in my young heart. Still, the child I was then had to suffer venomous racial discrimination and abuse at the hands of adults. People whom I was supposed to admire and whose examples as value producers to the society I was supposed to simulate.

I woke up early into manhood. I remember how the experience marked me to the point where my growing desire to leave Brazil became my life's driving force. That experience made me want to leave the country for good. I did. And I also did become something I am proud of. But only God knows what future the Brazil your dictators built would have held for me.

Now here's the thing Mr. Amaral. In today's Brazil there many children of the social and economic level I once had in Brazil. And they have the same dreams, desires and aspirations I did then. But millions of them aren't as lucky or had the foresight early on that leaving their beloved country behind was their only way out. And many, many of them are dead! And as you read this, many are being slaughtered by those called upon to protect the self-serving ruling political, social and some cases, even business fraternity.

I know this is hard for you and your inner circle to digest, but until Mr. Lula da Silva come on the scene, many, with unfailing frequency were (and still are) simply regarded as underclass outcast and are cast as pests; a social aberration if you will. Even now, when many among them walk into a supermarket or department, they aren't treated as regular costumers at first sight, but rather as 'the usual suspects.'

The math here is quite simple. If you deny a man his opportunity to earn his bread he'll turn to the nearest available option. And for many young men (and young women) in Brazil, that option is to join a brotherhood in the favelas where the job opportunities as drug pusher, dealers and murder-for-hire are plentiful. In their economy there are no crises. The demand outpaces supply ten fold. And the producers are harvesting billions of dollars in annual profit.

And this Mr. Amaral is the bequest of your so-touted benevolent dictators. While you and your symbiotic neo-cheating cohorts have enjoyed the spoils of Brazil's wealth, and may be covertly plotting a government take over, millions still remain sunk in their perennial social, political, economic and intellectual impoverishment.

In the foreseeable future, if your plan were ever to succeed, millions among them will still belong to that class of citizens who come in second. And most of all, nearly all will continue to live their lives mired in ignorance and be victim of injustice. Others will morph themselves from 'born-to-succeed' to perpetrators of crime.

Remember, most criminals aren't born, they are made. And in Brazil a great many number of poor kids turning to crime do so because the 'Benevolent dictators/benefactors' you advertise in strongly positive terms have set up an unwritten constitution just for them: The one that says, "Except where you are of service to us; you do NOT belong in our Private Ruling Elite Club."

President Lula and in part his predecessor understood that. And as a result he converted words into actions that caused over thirty million people to migrate from poverty to the middle class. All that achieved in the last six years as opposed to decades of social, political and economic stagnation Brazil has been famous for.

Now Mr. Amaral, Brazil finally has a chance to catch up, redeem and transform itself. It can truly become a nation of the future. Not the one General Charles de Gaulle once quipped and laughed about. Today you live in a Brazil that, while you may have been asleep and dreaming about your dictatorship fantasies, one recent announcement made by IMF has earmarked it to become the world's 5th largest economy by the 2015-20. (Yes 5th largest in the world!)

That's to say: USA #1, China #2, Japan #3, India #4 and...Brazil #5.

Some are predicting that it may beat India to 4th largest position by 2015. It means Mr. Amaral that either way, Brazil will be ahead of Germany. That's right, Germany (where I lived for 8 years and enjoyed the highest standard of living on the planet ever) which is Europe's biggest economy. And just so you know...Germany too, is a democracy.

According to Goldman Sachs, the World Bank and the CIA world book, by 2050 Brazil's GDP will hover between 11 to 14 Trillion US dollars. That's roughly the current size of the US GDP. However, compared to its vast potential, to me those figures are a meager pocket change.

But to today's Brazil, those figures are awesome nonetheless. By contrast, India's GDP - the world's largest and one the oldest democracies - will (regardless the size of its population) reach close to 40 trillion US dollars.

Curiously, the forecast for Brazil to in such short period place 5th or perhaps 4th among the top ten economies of the world has come only under the reign of Mr. Lula da Silva. Now doesn't it strike you odd that Lula, a man who is as far removed from the circles enjoyed by Brazil's parasitical ruling elites as earth is from Jupiter, was the one capable of elevating Brazil to a triple-rated, emerging market economic power?

That leads me to think the following: had we had a Lula on those 21 years of dictatorship in Brazil, North Americans and Europeans and the rest of the world would have been the ones knocking at Brazil's doors and begging at its borders for a chance to a fresh start in true land of opportunity. And many Brazilian expats such as me would not have needed to escape the virulent grip the self-serving ruling elite and their symbiotic Neocheaters had on our country.

So make sure you understand this. Brazil today is indeed a country of the future and this is its Century. Our nation is entitled to become a leading superpower on a parallel eye-to-eye level with the United States. Brazil is the B of the BRIC nations and has the capacity and potential to grow its GDP to the same or perhaps even greater size as that of the United Stated of America. The BRIC nations are known as emerging economies. I say that instead of being branded as emerging markets they must be called Growth Markets.

And it's the Growth Economies of BRIC who are the only major players growing meaningfully and are leading the Globe out of its crippling recession. And most economists and specially will tell you that of the four BRIC nations Brazil's conditions for growth and for business is the most favored. But even though we know you won't succeed, you want to derail that. You want to throw it back into its political, economic and social dark ages.

But even as you may try, Brazil and the Brazilian people must never again allow itself to be taken over by credentialed power hungry creeps that are probably right now drooling over your article, pondering upon the possibilities and secretly yearning for one other chance to parade themselves as Lords of the Land brandishing their shining-badges, dressed up in their stars encrusted uniforms. That band of criminals you are calling forthwith shall never and must never rule over Brazil again.

The Brazilian people know that among those who are in control over weapons depot and seating atop our military paraphernalia we will find honorable defenders of our fledgling democracy.

They will defend it so greater and greater parts of Brazil's resources are invested to root out white-hat political bandits and neocheaters and grafters and potentials political grafters from its mix. They will continue to support the fight to revamp the nation's flawed judicial system. Yes, the same judicial system that together with its symbiotic ruling elite is in great part the root cause of crime and lawlessness and corruption problem in Brazil.

So Mr. Dictator's advocate: in the name of objective justice, pull down your article and consider a long, heart-felt apology to the Brazilian people. And to our country, do the following: Agree with me that what Brazil needs right now, is the creation of Mass Education Acceleration Program or let's call it PAE: Programa de Aceleração da Educação ... for the entire population.

Education creates a creditworthy society. A creditworthy has little need to resort to crime as means of survival.

Can you see it?

It's PAE nor DICTATORSHIP. PAE! That's the word your social, economic evolutionary thinking failed to grasp. To you Mr. and all dictator wannabes, I say, PAE lies as the immediate solution to poverty and crime. (O' and may I mention that it will contribute to the decline in drug consumption in Brazil as well?)

You see. In most advanced societies, you'll find that a great portion of drug consumers are affluent and most addicted children belong to the politically protected Ivy-league class of the ruling elite.

BUT EDUCATION CAN TAKE CARE OF THAT TOO!

It would be beneficial for you to know that Brazil already possesses the means and the technology to root out each and every drug dealer off the streets and out of its core. If its society really wants to, it CAN. All it needs is the will to do it. Not some military, power - usurping of crooks to unleash a certain-to-fail war on drugs upon the children of Brazil.

Therefore, it is Brazil's society itself that must raise to power as a whole and with educational and intellectual sophistication elect leaders capable of cleaning house in Brazil for good. It can do it by employing democratically conceived rule of law. If it does, it will finally place Brazil's society among the educated class of nations.

Finally, just in case you are inclined to think or expose that education won't remedy the crime and lawlessness problem of modern Brazil, here's one more thing I got for you: I was born to an unrelentingly poor family in a shanty town in outskirt of São Paulo state.

We were seven children in total. As said previously, I left Brazil at a young age because even as a child I couldn't stand its pathetic level ignorance and social mediocrity in Brazil. Today I am a PHD, an author and a business professional. My sister lives in Washington state and is an academic. She too left Brazil to live in North America - of all places - to escape discrimination and to turn her back on the poverty in which we lived under: -  courtesy of the military regime.

As for my brothers and sisters who stayed in Brazil, all are hard-working people who have raised families and taught their children to plow ahead against the odds. They learned to grow and prosper through their own efforts and become larger-than-life contributing citizens to the Brazilian society.

None needed to have their individual rights seized from them in order to do so. Not one of us needed the return of a system of rule and governance that you wish to bring forth. For that social and economic system/military regime cost both of our parent's lives. We've been there, done that! Still, as kids we never experimented or even tried drugs, alcohol and none of us are hooked on any other addiction or vices that commonly plague most rich and poor Brazilian kids today.

Heck! None of us even ever smoked cigarettes.

Most amazing of all, our mother could barely read or write, but she was educated enough to EDUCATE her children to grow into law-abiding citizens. Indeed, she taught us to work with the aim of becoming contributors to the advancement of our country. It was her ability to educate us and insist that we pursue higher education on our own merits that saw us through.

EDUCATION (not DICTATORSHIP) is the key to individual and collective development and is directly responsible for the progress of a nation. I bet you didn't know that!

Let there be no Brazilian left behind. Never again!

And as for you Mr. AMARAL, YOU ARE THE WRONG SIDE OF HISTORY!

So my suggestion is as follows: Those who can't be part of or CAN'T conceive real, tangible solutions to eliminate poverty and crime Brazil, should then get undressed and expose themselves naked so the world can see them for WHO they REALLY are.

Then THEY should put on a hat and walk into the sea until the hat floats. Like that they can leave the country in the hands of those who want to really build its future and BUILD a Brazil for their children's future. Yes, build a future free from drugs, free from corrupt politicians, free from the Parasitical Ruling Elites and most importantly FREE from the hands of Nostalgic, delusional Dictators.

Still, I am prepared to concede that a coup d'état may still occur in Brazil. But if it does, I hope the Brazilian people will have grown strong enough to beat them back. And then amend the constitution to make sure the coup plotters are put behind bars...for life! And that they - the coup plotters - find them themselves ostracized and eventually laughed out of existence.

As for you Mr. Amaral, there's still time to GET on the right side of History.

Sam Paris is a singer/songwriter, entertainer, actor and author. Sam's multicultural background allowed him to spent years touring around the world, working at his craft and perfecting a vast repertoire of artistic impersonations.

Beyond showbiz, Sam Paris is a natural observer of human behavior and individual evolution. He was born in Brazil, near the great city of São Paulo, to an evangelical family. In the early eighties, he moved to the US to study theology at Norwest Bible College in Seattle, Washington. However, before graduating, he received a scholarship to attend Christian School in Oslo, Norway. After that, he returned to the US and received a PhD in philosophy and religion and an Honorary Degree in counseling psychology from Universal Life Church University. Then, a family tragedy forced him to swift focus and he joined another line of work, providing financial services and support for members of NATO Military Personnel and US Armed Forces in Germany. There, he launched a flourishing entertainment career and public relations consulting. In the mid-90's he relocated to France. Sam speaks Portuguese, Spanish, German, English, and French.

Sam Paris, under the name Silvan Teodoro, is the author of the highly acclaimed, number 1 book 'Build Your Body for Live, Sex and Love.' His book can be found online or at your local bookstore.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (94)Add Comment
It Is Closer Than You Think!!!!!!!!!!
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 28, 2010

27/04/2010

"Senador vítima de atentado culpa o narcotráfico paraguaio-brasileiro"
da France Presse, em Assunção da Reportagem Local
Folha de Sao Paulo – (Brasil)

O senador governista Robert Acevedo, que sobreviveu ao atentado nesta segunda-feira que deixou dois guarda-costas mortos, atribuiu o ataque à máfia do narcotráfico que domina a fronteira entre Paraguai e Brasil.

"Os responsáveis são narcotraficantes paraguaios associados com os brasileiros. Eles estão infiltrados na sociedade e são donos da vida e da morte. Eu me salvei por um milagre", disse Acevedo à imprensa.

O furgão do político sofreu cerca de 40 impactos de bala, sem que a polícia tenha ainda pistas dos atacantes. O senador pelo Partido Liberal sofreu o impacto de dois disparos.

Um de seus guarda-costas morreu ao tentar protegê-lo e o outro foi crivado por balas.

O fato ocorreu em pleno centro da cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero, capital do departamento (Província) de Amambay, separado por uma avenida de Ponta Porã, no Brasil.

Amambay foi declarado em estado de exceção assim como outros quatro departamentos do norte, nos quais foram mobilizados cerca de 3.000 policiais e militares para rastrear a existência de focos de supostos rebeldes autodenominados Exército do Povo Paraguaio (EPP), de esquerda.

A eles foi atribuído o assassinato há uma semana de quatro policiais no Departamento de Concepción, vizinho de Amambay.

Crime internacional

Para Acevedo, no entanto, o EPP não constitui nem um décimo dos bandos de narcotraficantes. "É algo internacional. Sua força é superior à da polícia. Eles têm armas poderosas para defender o poderoso movimento fronteiriço ilegal", relatou.

"Eles transformaram a cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero numa sociedade dominada pelo tráfico. Há políticos locais que estão associados a eles. A maioria dos candidatos políticos são pagos por eles", continuou.

"Para ocultar sua verdadeira atividade no submundo do narcotráfico, dedicam-se à venda de eletrônicos, móveis --comércios de fachada-- e até a entidades beneficentes".

"Eu os denunciava todos os dias, mas agora vejo que é impossível lutar contra eles. São extremadamente poderosos", enfatizou.

Acevedo é um empresário que atua com postos de gasolina e também é proprietário da rádio Amambay AM.

O furgão em que estava no momento do atentado era utilizado nas coberturas diárias da emissora.

PCC

O ministério do Interior paraguaio confirmou as identidades de dois brasileiros detidos como suspeitos do atentado, e indicou que as investigações já estão em estágio avançado.

A chefe de imprensa do ministério, Dolly Olmedo, disse em entrevista por telefone à Folha que os brasileiros Eduardo da Silva, 27, e Marcos Cordeiro Pereira, 34, estão presos na cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero, mas explicou que a polícia paraguaia ainda não tem comprovação da ligação dos dois com o PCC (Primeiro Comando da Capital), informação publicada pela imprensa local.

De acordo com informações do ministério, o senador Acevedo vinha sofrendo ameaças há muitos dias. "Ele já sabia que isto poderia acontecer, mas não tomou os cuidados necessários", disse Olmedo, confirmando ainda que o senador passa bem e já está fora de perigo. Segundo o ministério, o próprio senador teria comentado anteriormente que sua cabeça valeria US$ 500 mil (cerca de R$ 800 mil).

A cidade de Pedro Juan Caballero é a capital de Amambay, um dos Departamentos (Estados) declarados em estado de exceção pelo Parlamento paraguaio para combater a guerrilha EPP. O estado de exceção, decretado por 30 dias, afeta os Departamentos de Concepción, San Pedro, Amambay, Presidente Hayes e Alto Paraguai, onde vivem 800 mil pessoas, quatro deles fazem fronteira com o Brasil.

A polícia descartou qualquer ligação entre o EPP e o atentado desta segunda-feira.

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/f...6684.shtml


***


Atentado

O ataque aconteceu perto do terminal de ônibus da cidade, por volta das 18h (19h em Brasília), de acordo com o site do jornal paraguaio "Ultima Hora".

Os criminosos se aproximaram do carro do senador e dispararam ao menos 40 vezes, segundo as marcas deixadas no veículo, relataram fontes policiais a rádios da capital.

Derlis Arce, secretário do senador, informou à rádio Ñanduti que Acevedo levou dois tiros, um de raspão, e está em estado estável na clínica San Lucas.

Em entrevista à TV Telefuturo, da clínica onde está internado, o senador contou que "por um milagre de Deus não estou como os companheiros que estavam comigo, executados em pleno centro". O motorista Floriano Alonso e o policial Richard Martinez, que protegiam o parlamentar, morreram no ataque.

Acevedo relatou que um motociclista o ajudou a chegar até uma farmácia, em frente à clínica San Lucas, onde ele ficou escondido até que os criminosos fossem embora. Logo depois, atravessou a rua e foi atendido no hospital.

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/f...6655.shtml

.

Your statement summarizes in a nutshell your complete ignorance of Brazilian history
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 28, 2010

Sam Paris said: I may be mistaken Mr. Amaral, but from what I read in your article it would appear you are a direct descendant of the Parasitical Ruling Elites that ruled Brazil since its inception as nation. If so, you are direct descendant of those who raided the country's wealth, peddled its natural resources and have ultimately mortgaged the future of a nation.


*****


Ricardo: That statement summarizes in a nutshell your complete ignorance of Brazilian history, and the background of my family.

It is laughable, and at the same time it is sad that you don’t have a clue about what you are writing about.

.
In no way, shape pr form....
written by Sam Paris, April 28, 2010
the comments written by Sam Paris was intended to disparage your family or to demean and chastise its name and your knowledge of Brazilian history is commendable. That's precisely why its stunning that a man of your stature would advocate such blazing and misguided notion. It would not be useful to build a quarrel over who's point merit the highest score, however; if you're prepared to accept that at the present stage the only way forward for Brazil its prod itself forward by marching solely on democratic grounds, there are many reasons to believe that by adopting this posture, you'd make your ancestors proud and that you'd be insuring that their sacrifice would not have been made in vain. Would you agree? Furthermore, I am prepared to believe that a man of your caliber and ancestral history is well-equipped and qualified to assume the power of the presidency and put forward a blueprint that's fresh of the press to effectively combat crime and lawlessness plaguing Brazil right now.
Consider moving your heart, Sir, toward democratic aspirations and to our a great of all services; solidify its democratic foundation.
May you and yours be blessed infinitely and prosperous and democratic Brazil!
In absolute no way, shape or form....
written by Sam Paris, April 28, 2010

the rebuttal posted by Sam Paris was intended to disparage your family or to demean and chastise the name of your family. Also your knowledge of Brazilian history is admirable. That's why its striking that a man of so much stature and knowledge would put forth such blazing and misguided notion. It would not be useful to build a quarrel over who's point merit the highest score, however; if you're prepared to accept that at the present stage the only way forward for Brazil its to prod itself forward by marching solely on democratic grounds. There are many reasons to believe that by adopting this posture, you'd make your ancestors proud and that you'd be insuring that their service or sacrifice on behalf of Brazil would not have been made in vain. Would you agree? Furthermore, I am prepared to believe that a man of your caliber and ancestral history is well-equipped and qualified to assume the power of the presidency and put forward a blueprint that's fresh of the press to effectively combat crime and lawlessness plaguing Brazil right now.
Consider moving your heart, Sir, toward democratic aspirations and to our nation our do a great of all services; solidify its democratic foundation.
May you prosper in a democratic Brazil and may its future generation remember you and your famil's name as one the nation's greatest heroes . (a bit in a hurry here!)
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 28, 2010

Sam Paris,

You did not understand the core of my article and what pushed me to write such an article.

I also believe in democracy and democratic ideals, but I did explain on my article on how democratic governments are losing the war against the narco-traffic and their violent network of criminals.

Another point that is missing in your analysis is that by writing that article I put my life on the line.

I have been told a number of times that journalists, politicians, and most people who are connected with the justice system in Brazil – if they start investigating these criminal gangs they are eliminated by these mafia groups.

That’s why things are going to just deteriorate in Brazil and each time it is going to get even more out of control. I have been following for years here in the US what has been happening in Mexico. CNN the cable news organization shows on a daily basis the anarchy and chaos that has been going on in Mexico regarding their internal civil war against the narco-traffic.

More and more international investors are having second thoughts about investing in Mexico since that country is imploding and spinning out of control one step at the time – and Brazil is not far behind.

What is holding Russia’s back from its full economic development potential?

The fact that the Russian mafia runs that country today, and corruption is widespread - And at a certain point the Russian people probably are going to ask for the military to take control of that country, even under the leadership of Putin, and give him the authority to fix that massive problem.

A democratic system does not have the tools and know-how to handle the cancer that is destroying the foundations of our societies.

The Chinese have the right idea on that department, and how to keep the narco-traffic out of China.

My article about dictatorship in Brazil has nothing to do with form of economic system or political ideology – my article has everything to do with taking Brazil back from the influence and growing dominance by the narco-traffic and their violent mafia.

If we don’t fix that massive cancer that is growing out of control in Brazil, then forget about the economic and social future of Brazil, because it does not matter.

Are you involved in the narco-traffic in any way?

You are in the entertainment business, and a lot of people involved on that line of business are free spirit, and many take drugs on a regular basis just for recreation.

And anyone who dares to criticize the narco-traffic is just old fashion person, and not cool.

.



...
written by Paul WIlson, April 28, 2010
Why should you assume that a dictatorial-militaristic government would be against narco trafficking?

There are many examples of undemocratic and corrupt governments that are synonymous with drug trafficking. Burma, Afghanistan, are the first examples that come to mind. Who is to say that the military dictatorship would not just step in and take over this lucrative business as in the case of Noriega in Panama?
"Briefly update"
written by "The Observer", April 28, 2010
@ Sam Paris; Comments to articles in newspapers here in S w e d e n often compare S w e d e n with s o c i a l i s t s t a t e s like E a s t G e r m a n y before the wall fell and authorities with S T A S I. My writings will update you folks about how things really are in S w e d e n and it's high time to update the picture. This is not to be seen as critic - just a remark - The article is well written and you have a good picture of things in Brasil as well as in Sweden (but it's not as it was 35 years ago).
...
written by Sam Paris, April 28, 2010
No Sir, I explained clearly that neither I or no one in my family have fallen pray to any addiction of any kind and most principally I abhor the very thought of being controlled by external forces and would not, in the widest stretch of imagination, permit myself to be enslaved by narco-substances. Therein lies the beauty of concept of freedom. Every man, women and child are born with the freedom template handed over to them. And being FREE from one's self-induced dependency on something that is psychologically or physically habit-forming (especially alcohol or narcotic drugs)is to me the greatest expression of freedom of all. But unfortunately millions along the course of their lives lose their freedom; either to tyranny or to the abnormally strong craving of self-imposed vices.

Addictions of all sorts (not just those made illegal) tear the fabric of a society and the problem is epidemic, widespread and evident everywhere.

As a Christian evangelical I spent years in my youth doing missionary work with YWAM 'Youth With a Mission' the Assembly of God and other religious organizations, helping, counseling and providing assistance to hundreds of youths and adults; employing time, energy and limited resources to help them deal with their substance abuse. One of my sister is a pastor in Brazil, another served as a missionary in Mozambique for for years. And the purpose of our mission remained the same: help those who at first couldn't readily help themselves.

But where we could agree in principle we differ vastly in approach. And thus, we may have reached stalemate here; I'd say that the problem of drug, crime, lawlessness doesn't start with these metaphors or the products themselves but with the individual consumer himself. Therefore, the cookie crumbles in the presence of the law of supply and demand forcing its hand each time here. A bottle of booze remains full until the individual pops the cork and wash the liquid down his throat. All products and suppliers fail and the producers run out of business where there's no market. And I am foot-sure you'd agree that the war on drugs is an incredibly profitable machine. And the war-on-drugs industry is just starting to grow.

The problem is real, the situation is critical and the prospective outlook is grim. But the method called for in your article to remedy or eradicate the problem is what irked me in that it calls for an entire nation to be put under the gun as a way to get to the bottom of Brazil's social predicament.

It may sound naive on my part, but I have an indelible faith in the grandeur of the human spirit. At that, I pray that the people of Brazil will in the end of the day summon their strength and their courage to save the nation from the path of self-destruction. Perhaps in my indignant furor I may have offended you but that thought of seeing Brazil, regardless of the circumstances, ruled by dictators was an idea hard to digest. No offence intended!

Let's pray that the Armageddon you fear due to the drug problem never come to pass. And that the powers that govern our beloved Brazil (our federal, democratic government) will prevail in their search to find a common ground and hopefully solve all of its pesky and most persistent problems. And pray and trust that this time at last, each Brazilian citizen seize the opportunity to live and prosper in freedom indefinitely.
Elites in democracies push dope
written by Brazuca, April 28, 2010
Isn't the CIA the biggest drug pusher out there? And they come from a DEMOCRATIC country. LOL

And the British pushed/force-fed dope to the Chinese back in colonial times. Remember the Opium Wars? The Chinese tried to kick the opium trade out of the country, as it was making opium addicts out of the population, and the British forcefully came back in to reinstate the trade, keeping Hong Kong for the next 100 years for good measure. And I believe the Mother of Democracies was a DEMOCRACY at the time! LOL

The heroin trade in Afghanistan is supported by the American forces there. They could immediately eliminate it, but they nurture and protect it. Russia has asked the Americans to eliminate this trade, as many Russians are now addicted to the drug, but the Americans have refused to do anything. The Afghan heroin trade has boomed since the arrival of NATO (DEMOCRATIC) troops.
UPPs seem to be working
written by Brazuca, April 28, 2010
By the way, the UPPs going up all the time here in Rio seem to be regaining things from the narcotraffickers. Here in Zona Sul I've noticed that most PM's nowadays don't bother to wear their bullet-proof vests anymore. The authorities took this morning a big favela in Tijuca, the first one in Zona Norte. The authorities seem to be wresting control of the favelas from the narcotraffickers.
Reply to Paul Wilson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 28, 2010

Paul Wilson: Why should you assume that a dictatorial-militaristic government would be against narco trafficking?


*****


Ricardo: During the military dictatorship years in Brazil, the military people in power did not enriched themselves. Most of them after they left the government they stayed relatively poor and belonged to the middle class.

Our military people are a group of honest people when compared with other groups of the population, and they do their job more based on idealism, and what is good for the country than anything else.

From all the feedback that I have been receiving from people who I respect and have in high regard in Brazil – they like the idea of General Augusto Heleno becoming the new military ruler of Brazil.

.
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, April 28, 2010

During the military dictatorship years in Brazil, the military people in power did not enriched themselves. Most of them after they left the government they stayed relatively poor and belonged to the middle class.

Our military people are a group of honest people when compared with other groups of the population, and they do their job more based on idealism, and what is good for the country than anything else.


You are right and I don't think that Dr.Paris is fully aware of "other side" of the story. Though he wrote an eloquent piece of article in impeccable English, I think he would be better off entertaining the NATO troops serving in Afghanistan.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

A simple comment from a humble peasant like me in reply to his following statement:

Furthermore, I am prepared to believe that a man of your caliber and ancestral history is well-equipped and qualified to assume the power of the presidency and put forward a blueprint that's fresh of the press to effectively combat crime and lawlessness plaguing Brazil right now.


Ricardo, if you decide to stand for the Presidency, you should seriously consider him for the job of Minister of Cultural Affairs. I bet he would do a better job than Gilberto or Marta.smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif.

Also remember that Dr.Paris is your fellow "Paulistano".smilies/cheesy.gif
Comedy!
written by adrianerik, April 28, 2010
Dictatorships! I shouldn't be surprised. Myopic views fueled by MBAs (I have one) and right wing religeous reductionsim of human beings leads to a belief in the Strong Man.

It's interesting...in Afghanistan nearly all of the leading drug producing regions (13 or 34) are controlled by the Taliban. In those controlled by the United States, drug production is actually decreasing as the government invests in alternative crops.

And that is the gist in that country. You have the evils of drugs and the evils of millions of farmers possibly turning to armed insurgency if they are deprived of, what is to them, a cash crop, that exists in their families for generations.

Oh...but excuse me...pragmatism has no place here....does it.

Dictatorships.

When the right wing dictatorships in Venezuela (before Chavez), Nicaragua (Somoza) and Panama (Noriega) were enriching themselves with their drug trade, no one screamed of CIA complicity. Why...because retaining anti-communists leaders were more important than eradicating drugs. (I believe that some on this site actually voiced support for these dictators earlier and NOW...they are whining about CIA complicity in the drug trade).

So it goes.

You know, Amaral...another thing the Chinese communists did (correctly..question mark) was to send their intellectuals and so-called elites to the fields for a 'real education'. What do you think about that.

By the way...in your MBA program...did you do HBS cases (Harvard Business School). Remember the one about General Motors and the succession of CEOs with MBA degrees who ran it into to ground.

Dictatorships! Really.
Taking Bets....
written by fried CHC, April 28, 2010


Who will win the war of words "Sam Paris versus Ricardo Amaral"

The first one who turns his opponent into PULP, wins!

Please.... No Gringos into the mix!

Hehehe

Costinha
...
written by Paul WIlson, April 28, 2010
Russia has asked the Americans to eliminate this trade, as many Russians are now addicted to the drug, but the Americans have refused to do anything. The Afghan heroin trade has boomed since the arrival of NATO (DEMOCRATIC) troops.

Yes, I have heard of this, but you misrepresent the situation. From what I understand, as mentioned above, the US has a delicate balancing act to achieve there: offend the Russians by contributing further to the heroin problem plaguing Russia, or offend the poor farmers who make a generous livelihood from heroin. Many farmers have been able to grow heroin under the Taliban, so by repressing heroin and not providing an alternative, the US would deliver them to the Taliban. I guess if you are bent on demonizing the US, this doesn't fit into your simplistic black-and-white dichotomy.

Ricardo: while you are right to be alarmed about drugs and the out of control power of drug traffickers in Brazil, I find it hard to swallow that the military are so honest and would be glad to remain simply middle class while they serve the country. Has this ever been the case of any government where power is so concentrated without any form of checks and balances? Or should I say, absolute power, corrupts absolutely? You would give up your freedom in hope that a military junta would deliver you from the drug scourge? Come on! Wake up and smell the coffee. Military governments are like synonymous with corrupt self interested ventures. You hope for a reformed junta? By juntas are by their nature unresponsive to the will of the people and corrupt. Please don't mention anymore of your so called credentials to justify your wacky ideas: I don't care if you have an MBA, Phd, wrote several books and are from ancestors who founded Brazil: this is just plain old dumb! You don't ask the devil to get your house in order.

But now that you are throwing out dramatic ideas to solve a serious problem, I wonder if anyone has seriously considered this option: legalize all drugs in Brazil, and have the government sell them legally to those poor fools interested in them. Then with the revenue from this, fund the decrepit public school system of Brazil.
It would eliminate organized crime and all the violence they bring in fighting each other for control of turf. It would eliminate money spent on jails and policing. Sounds radical, but I believe this may work as well, and you wouldn't have to give up your freedom to a military junta.
...
written by Paul WIlson, April 29, 2010
Uncle Sam Paris: you nailed it! I couldn't have said it better: talking dreamily about the good old days of dictatorship is NONSENSE! It reminds me of the Germans and Italians who praised the fascist because the trains ran on time. Or nowadays, many Russians talk glowingly of the "good old days" of Stalin, when there was no problem with crime, and Russia was a proud powerful nation. Do I need to explain why Stalin or Hitler were evil rulers, no matter if the trains ran on time? And do I need to explain why the dictatorship of Brazil, was evil, no matter what other good may have coexisted in this time?
adrian eric
written by asp, April 29, 2010
how is your work in bahia going? im curious.how can i get some info on it? any name i can google up to read about what you are doing up there?
Reply to adrianerik
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

Adrianerik: You know, Amaral...another thing the Chinese communists did (correctly..question mark) was to send their intellectuals and so-called elites to the fields for a 'real education'. What do you think about that.


*****


Ricardo: How off the mark you are with your understanding of what has been going on in China in 2010.

Let me give you another example to see if the members of this forum can understand what I am talking about.

Let put your idea about China in another perspective.

Your idea of the China of today is in the same level as if you were using examples about the Soviet Union to explain today’s Russia. It is like your idea of that country had been frozen in time – a time long gone.

Today’s China is light-years ahead of your concept of old China. China is becoming very fast the world of the future and they have been going through a massive transformation in such a short period of time as never seen before in world history.

It is amazing to me how clueless most people are about what is going on in China.

Let me quote from John Naisbitt “China’s Megatrends” as follows:

While China’s economy is the most pronounced manifestation of the great changes in China, it is only part of the historical shift that has occurred and perhaps not even the most important part. Early on, Deng Xiaoping said: “We have to build up two civilizations: the material civilization, and the espiritual civilazation.” The artistic and intellectual excitement in China today reflects the energizing of that spiritual civilization.

When we think of the Renaissance, names of artists and intellectuals--Michelangelo, Leonardo, Tintoretto, Shakespeare, Torquato Tasso, Guttemberg—come to mind. They were precursors of a huge shift in scientific, social, and political thought. Deng Xiaoping’s visionary thinking inspired China’s economic transition. The imagination and creativity of China’s artist’s prepared the ground for creativity in other fields, Art reflects society and fortifies a country’s identity.

In the old China, obedience was of high value, and a subordinate working class served very well in China’s first stage as workshop of the world. But what will drive China into the next stage—the creation of distinctive Chinese products and design—will be the spirit of nonconforming, talented, creative artists and intellectuals.

…In the early 1980’s the Central Academy of Fine Arts in Beijing occupied a modest plot of land near Tiananmen Square where the faculty, not long before, had rigidly taught Soviet-style realist art to only about 200 students. If you visit the school today you will see a new thirty-three-acre campus with more than 4,000 students, chosen from 60,000 applicants. Many of these students dream of following in the footsteps of alumni, some of whom today make millions in international markets.

…The new individual freedoms have resulted in an explosion of artistic expression that is now spilling over into the world, along with China’s economic assertiveness. China is moving in the direction of becoming the world leader in art, architecture, and design, just as the United States did in the twentieth century.

…The emphasis on design is affecting China’s new, big markets of tomorrow: cars, internet services, information technology, and entertainment. Another measure of “design China” is that in 2008, more than 500 design colleges were operating all across the country.”


****


The biggest socio-economic revolution that the world ever saw has been underway in China at a pace never seen before.

Unlike the European Union, Japan, and the United States that it seems unable to move forward with its socio-economic system because it seems entangled in its own ties with the past – at the same time China has not only met but exceeded all its socio-economic goals –and this new Chinese socio-economic model were able to lift about 400 million people out of poverty in the last 20 years, and with the prospect of doing even better in the future.

.
Thank God for the Russians!
written by Brazuca, April 29, 2010
Sorry, I forgot to link to the sites for my information.

http://orientalreview.org/2010/03/29/nato-rejects-russias-demand-to-destroy-afghan-poppy-fields/

http://orientalreview.org/2010/04/25/the-afghan-war-no-blood-for-opium/

Such Russian sites are the best for telling it like it is. The Russians tend to be straightforward and truthful. Such is the propaganda we've been fed with all our lives, for example, that I had no idea that WWII was essentially a fight between the Germans and the Russians, and that it was the Russians who won it. I'd heard before brief mentions from Russians that they'd won the War, but I had no idea what they were talking about, thinking that they were perhaps alluding to the monumental losses they suffered. But once I realised that on the Western Front there were something like 15 to 20 divisions involved, whereas in the Easter Front there were hundreds of divisions involved, I finally realised what a slanted view of history I'd previously been given. It was essentially a fight between the Germans and Russians (thanks, in no small part, to Perfidious Albion's balance-of-power geostrategy).

And how many of you know how critical the Russians were to the victory of the Union forces during the American Civil War? The Russian Atlantic and Pacific fleets were harbored in New York and San Francisco respectively at a critical time, a warning for the British and French to refrain from joining the fray on the side of the Confederates. Were it not for the Russians, Britain and France would have helped the Confederates to victory and Latin America would have probably been reconolised. (Napoleon III had imperial designs on Mexico and towards this end actually coined the term Latin American.) Who knows what would have been Brazil's fate had history taken this turn. (British intelligence ended up taking out Lincoln later on, preferring to defeat and take over America from within, which they finally succeeded in doing with the institution of the Federal Reserve in 1913.)
Indians on Her Majesty's Secret Service
written by Brazuca, April 29, 2010
By the way, I remember being pooh-poohed by a poster here relatively recently when I pointed to much of the environmental focus on the Amazon being funded by Anglo-American oligarchical interests as a strategy of denying exploitation by Brazil of the riches therein and perhaps for these riches to be appropriated by said interests themselves.

Well, I was in a restaurant in Flamengo on Sunday evening with some friends and the television in the background was showing some footage of a protest involving Indians against the development of the Bel Monte Dam in the Amazon. The guy opposite me was watching with interest and I asked him, curious to garner the opinion of Brazilians on the matter, first of all, "What do you think about this dam -- do you think it should be built?" He answered affirmatively, so, encouraged, I followed up with, "Do you know that these indigenous groups are funded by foreign oligarchical interests?" He nodded vigorously and matter-of-factly, as if this was well known. He asked rhetorically why there are barely any NGOs working in the poor and arid Northeast, where there are many poor and starving people, whereas there's a mountain of NGOs in the resource-rich Amazon! Surprised, I asked how he came to know of all this, wondering whether there were some news sources that told things like they were. He replied that he'd been an officer in the Army for eight years, in the armored corps, and was now in the reserves. He said that such knowledge was well known amongst those in the military.
Reply to Joao da Silva
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 29, 2010

Joao da Silva: Ricardo, if you decide to stand for the Presidency,


*****


Ricardo: As you must know by now, I am not a politician, and I am not politically correct, since I say what is on my mind, Besides, I am too honest to be a politician of any kind.

The best I could do as a leader of Brazil (which will never happen) is to be similar leader to a benevolent dictator in the same line of Lee Kuan Yew the Prime Minister (benevolent dictator) of Singapore. He turned that country from a very poor country into one of the highest socio-economic miracles of the last 40 years.

As a leader of Brazil I would look very closely for answers by studying and adopting the best policies from the social-economic model of 4 countries around the world: China, Singapore, Germany and Sweden.

The new China – this new socio-economic system that the Chinese still is in the process of developing - it is a work in progress, with its flexible and trying new ways of doing things to achieve the best benefits and goals.

.
...
written by João da Silva, April 29, 2010

Who will win the war of words "Sam Paris versus Ricardo Amaral"


My bet is on Ricardo, Costa. And yours?smilies/cheesy.gif
nice singing, sam paris
written by asp, April 29, 2010
saw some of your youtubes, nice voice

brazuca,the russions wouldnt have beat the germans at stalingrad if there wasnt a d day invasion.or allied bombing. dont fool yourself. ther are some ass holes that want to rewrite history....f**k off

oh yeah, you are the guy that sais there is no racism in brazil and i brought in several articles showing neo nazi attacks on black people in differant cities

your credibility is low with me
asp
written by João da Silva, April 29, 2010

saw some of your youtubes, nice voice


I am pleased that you approve of his voice and songs. He should stick to entertaining the NATO troops in Bagram and Kandahar, instead of calling our Military personnel as a "Band of Criminals".

BTW, he is no match for Ricardo and I can sense that he has already thrown in the proverbial towel.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif

Read what Ricardo wrote:

As you must know by now, I am not a politician, and I am not politically correct, since I say what is on my mind, Besides, I am too honest to be a politician of any kind.


Ricardo is honest and is not aiming for any political post, nor pretending to be a "host" in Rede Globo shows. Can we say the same thing for Dr.Paris?smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gifsmilies/angry.gif

As usual, I await your valuable comments on this important issue. smilies/smiley.gif
joao da silva for presidente da republica
written by asp, April 30, 2010
an idea whos time has come.....
"The Brazilian Formula for Success: "
written by ch.c., April 30, 2010
Hello everyone. Especially to Joao !
I am backkkkkkk !

As to the The Brazilian Formula for Success, the answer is VERY SIMPLE :
just take 12 zeroes out of your currency. This is what you did in 70 years. Yessss 4 times THREE zeroes were erased. Only Zimbabwe has done better. NO ONE ELSE !
And Brazil finally became competitive...IN BASIC COMMODITIES ONLY !
And of the BRIC club, Brazil had the LOWEST GDP economic growth rate since God Lula was elected ! And this despite the CROOK Lula changed the math methodology in 2007, retroactively of course because on the old math (2003-2006) the growth rate was PITY !


As to Ricardo Amaral, no doubt he belongs to a well known dynasty of corrupted to the roots family.
And why does this junkie Ricardo doesnt even reside in BRAZIL ?
This could explain why Brazil is not doing as bad.
The least Amaralsssss are in Brazil...the better Brazil will do....overall ! Ahhh...ahhhh !

Ohhhhh by the way.... despite Greece problems, Brazil has a loooonnngggg way to go before being as developed as Greece.
Suffice to compare the GDP per capita ! Ahhh...ahhhh !
Brazil will need another century or two just to come closer to Greece !
But doubtful you will surpass their GDP per capita during this millenium !

.-)))))
ch.c
written by João da Silva, April 30, 2010

Hello everyone. Especially to Joao !
I am backkkkkkk !


Welcome back, Komrad. It is great to hear from you after a long time.

Forget about Zimbabwe´s economic woes. Every single fellow blogger is more concerned about your welfare and interested in knowing how your "stay" in Libya was.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
asp
written by João da Silva, April 30, 2010

joao da silva for presidente da republica


The writer of this article is against any kind of dictatorship.smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
I am pleased that you approve of his voice and songs. He should stick to entertaining the NATO troops in Bagram and Kandahar, instead of calling our Military personnel as a "Band of Criminals".
written by Sam J. Wes, April 30, 2010
Sam Paris is a lover (of individual freedom) not a fighter! He hasn't thrown in the towel, but rather laid out a red carpet for all who cherish their freedom and stand for the protection of their individual rights to walk on.
For the record, what we are discussing here is Military Dictatorship and not the military. To announce that somehow Sam Paris suggests that the military are criminals is a gross misrepresentation of facts, a mischaracterization based on a non sequitur.
The usurpation of the rights of the individual and of a nation is a CRIME. Anyone who resorts to such tactics is a criminal. Simple; period!
The Brazilian armed forces are composed of brave men and women who are heroes that on a day-to-day basis stand ready in sacrifice for our nation. And it’s because of them Brazil enjoys the freedom it enjoys today.
Get your facts straight and understand that the issue here is DEMOCRACY vs. DICTATORSHIP.
Some so-called "benevolent dictators" may be viewed as beneficial and their leadership seen as a "necessary evil". But to help alleviate your understand of DICTATORSHIP, it is defined as follows:
•is an absolute ruler of a sovereign state;
•governs outside the otherwise accepted rule of law;
•commonly (but not necessarily) gained power through fraud or a coup d'état, or resorts to them to stay in power;
•may develop a cult of personality;
•may be autocratic, oppressive, despotic or tyrannical.

A dictator is a ruler (e.g. absolutist or autocratic) who assumes sole and absolute power (sometimes but not always with military control) but without hereditary ascension such as an absolute Monarch. When other states call the head of state of a particular state a dictator, that state is called a dictatorship. The word originated as the title of a magistrate in ancient Rome appointed by the Senate to rule the republic in times of emergency (see Roman dictator and justitium)
Like the term "tyrant" (which was originally a respectable Ancient Greek title), and to a lesser degree "autocrat", "dictator" came to be used almost exclusively as a non-titular term for oppressive, even abusive rule, yet had rare modern titular uses.
In modern usage, the term "dictator" is generally used to describe a leader who holds and/or abuses an extraordinary amount of personal power, especially the power to make laws without effective restraint by a legislative assembly. Dictatorships are often characterized by some of the following traits: suspension of elections and of civil liberties; proclamation of a state of emergency; rule by decree; repression of political opponents without abiding by rule of law procedures; these include single-party state, and cult of personality.
The term "dictator" is comparable to, but not synonymous with, the ancient concept of a tyrant; initially "tyrant", like "dictator", did not carry negative connotations. A wide variety of leaders coming to power in a number of different kinds of regimes, such as military juntas, single-party states and civilian governments under personal rule, have been described as dictators.

However, I’ve randomly picked 10 prominent names and I'd like to ask Mr. Amaral (if I may) and anyone on his camp to describe each individual from the list below in 3 simple adjectives. Just 3…not more!

1.Noriega 2. General Franco 3. Pinochet 4. Galtieri 5. Fujimori 6. Duvalier. 7. Hussein 8. Stalin 9. Kim Il-sung 10. Hitler
Take a close look at names and please describe each individual in three simple adjectives. Then, let us know if what you chose is what you want to be known for after you’ve passed on. Or if that’s the attribute you’d want your son or daughter to inherit.
Just is an exercise!
welcome back ch c
written by asp, April 30, 2010
we definitly need some of your economic insights , these days
Reply to Ch.c
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

I had be wondering what happened to you in the last year, then after reading about all the financial scandals and banking shenanigans in Switzerland, I figured out that you must be in prison.

It seems that the banking system in your country is in the same category as Goldman Sachs the Pillage People.

I am surprised that they did let you out of prison so soon.

Did you learn some new tricks when you were in prison?

Tell us about your experiences with all your new boyfriends when you were in prison?

Please give us an up date regarding your prison experiences in the last year.

Based on your comments it seems you still are high on crack…

Ch.c is back the number one Brazil basher on the web.

.
All Bets are Off! A challenge to Mr. Amaral
written by Sam Paris, April 30, 2010
I've taken the gloves off and am ready to step in the ring.

Here's what I got.

I've created a Facebook Group called DEFEND BRAZIL DEMOCRACY

Here's the link: http://www.facebook.com/group....t_info=all

Here's what it will do.

Pull together millions of people who love their democratic way of life and Brazil and the world; and they will become the part of an online nation that will voice their support to nearly 200 Million Brazilians who cherish the new-found freedom.

Here's what I want you do.

Build a group yourself and let be joined by those who support your idea and back up your plan.

Let's see which group will group will at least 50 Million people by year end. And see which group will make a real difference.

Your move Sir!

All you commentators in favor of democracy, join the group now and invites everyone to JOIN.

P.S. May Brazil prosper indefinitely and may God bless our Armed Forces.
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

Sam Paris: However, I’ve randomly picked 10 prominent names and I'd like to ask Mr. Amaral (if I may)…


*****


Ricardo: I wonder why you have used a bunch of people on your example that have been out of power for a long time?

I am going to help you make your case a little better: how about if you mentioned instead some current leaders such as: Military Junta in Burma, or Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, or Omar al-Bashir in Sudan, or Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan, Muammar al-Qaddafi in Libya, Bashar al-Assad in Syria, Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, and let’s not forget the Pope (the oldest dictatorship in the history of the world).

.
Just a few words....
written by fried CHC, April 30, 2010




In my view, there is no such thing as a benevolent dictatorship. All dictatorships are based on intimidation and/or oppression of the masses!

As a person who believes in the almighty, my conviction remains that the voice of the people is the voice of God.

Costinha
Reply to Ricardo
written by Sam Paris, April 30, 2010
Fair enough. Let's pick the names you suggested: Military Junta in Burma, or Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, or Omar al-Bashir in Sudan, or Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan, Muammar al-Qaddafi in Libya, Bashar al-Assad in Syria, Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, and the Pope.

Now under each name put 3 adjectives that describe their persona.

Let's see how this stack up.



...
written by don't see the problem, April 30, 2010
And how many of you know how critical the Russians were to the victory of the Union forces during the American Civil War? The Russian Atlantic and Pacific fleets were harbored in New York and San Francisco respectively at a critical time, a warning for the British and French to refrain from joining the fray on the side of the Confederates. Were it not for the Russians, Britain and France would have helped the Confederates to victory and Latin America would have probably been reconolised. (Napoleon III had imperial designs on Mexico and towards this end actually coined the term Latin American.) Who knows what would have been Brazil's fate had history taken this turn. (British intelligence ended up taking out Lincoln later on, preferring to defeat and take over America from within, which they finally succeeded in doing with the institution of the Federal Reserve in 1913.)


Russians in the New York Harbor dictating US policy after the Civil War???? Where do you get your news from the Russian equivalent to the World Weekly News??? Wacko!!!
Utter insanity!
And sure, the Russians lost 20 million people to the war through famine and other hardships, and many important battles were fought there, but you entirely trivialize the role of the US and Western Europe, Canada, Australian and other allies in the war. You are living in a dream world.
Sam Paris
written by João da Silva, April 30, 2010

For the record, what we are discussing here is Military Dictatorship and not the military. To announce that somehow Sam Paris suggests that the military are criminals is a gross misrepresentation of facts, a mischaracterization based on a non sequitur.


Thanks Reverend, for clarifying the facts. But...But..., the title of your article clearly implies otherwise. Please do re-read it:

Mr. Amaral, the Band of Military Criminals You Admire Must Never Rule Over Brazil Again


Of course, I am willing to give you the benefit of doubt as the Editors of this magazine might have changed the original title. Or you deliberately wrote this title to start a healthy debate.

The Brazilian armed forces are composed of brave men and women who are heroes that on a day-to-day basis stand ready in sacrifice for our nation. And it’s because of them Brazil enjoys the freedom it enjoys today.


Finally it dawned upon you, eh?

Actually, your article was very interesting and a counterpoint to what Ricardo wrote. More later.
Of course, I am willing to give you the benefit of doubt as the Editors of this magazine might have changed the original title. Or you deliberately wrote this title to start a healthy debate.
written by Sam Paris, April 30, 2010
You guessed correctly! The editors of this Forum doctored the Title of the article and it's having an effect!

Read the article carefully and you'll find that it doesn't quite express in the I intended

The original title of my piece is: Rebuttal to The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship

Of course, I am willing to give you the benefit of doubt as the Editors of this magazine might have changed the original title. Or you deliberately wrote this title to start a healthy debate.
written by Sam Paris, April 30, 2010
You guessed correctly! The editors of this Forum doctored the Title of the article and it's having an effect!

Read the article carefully and you'll find that it doesn't quite express in the I intended

The original title of my piece is: Rebuttal to The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship

KUNT
written by luigi, April 30, 2010
Sam Paris, Great name, great posting. Amaral is a homo who lives to post on sites like these instead of running the gaunlet of the streets of Rio.
Costinha is a little Brazilian bitch, who I enjoy observing from the great state of Texas. Enjoy that sunny s**thole of a country you fags.
Sam Paris
written by João da Silva, April 30, 2010

The original title of my piece is: Rebuttal to The Brazilian Formula for Success: Dictatorship


I suspected that the editors doctored your original tile! Ricardo assured us that his original title was maintained.

Read the article carefully and you'll find that it doesn't quite express in the I intended


I read your article more carefully than you can imagine. You did a splendid job in demolishing the "Caudilhismo" that still prevails in our country.

BTW, may I remind you that Ricardo´s ancestry is not the issue under discussion. It is the "Shocking" wake up call he gave that counts.

Keep tuned, Rev. More coming.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
Luigi The mafiosi
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

Mama mia Luigi,

Ma que Luigi, what is wrong with you?

Is your illegal drug distribution business doing O.K.?

You seem to have your period when you posted your insults to me and to another member of this forum.

In a few days when your period will be gone, and you might calm down a little.

That’s too bad that your mama did not teach you some manners.

Now, why don’t you go back to the sewer where you belong?
.
Luigi - before I forget...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 30, 2010

If Brazil has the chance to play against Italy during the coming World Cup - we are going to kick your ass - and teach you guys how to play soccer.

.
Hold Your horses!
written by Sam Paris, April 30, 2010
Gentleman! Back off a little. Personal insults is an act of passive violence. It won't do any good if we take the low road and resort to personal attacks here. It's childish and beyond pale. I am calling on all sides to cool it!

The beauty of democracy, the very thing that honorable Ricardo wishes to wrestle away is that even he can speak his mind without fear of that a dictatorship will shut him up. If you feel particularly incendiary about it all, join the Facebook Group I just created called Defend Brazil Democracy and let millions of Brazilians and the world know you mean business. Rev. S. Paris
Horses what?
written by Simpleton, May 01, 2010
Sam O Bama (SOB) has not yet been highjacked but Ricardo clearly didn't post a few of the above carrying his namesake. I trust you can study various patterns and see this - just ignore them Sam, we don't like feeding the trolls.

I wish you hadn't agreed to switch over the name list. I thought just one adjective would have done just fine for the whole first lot.
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 01, 2010

You are new to this forum, and in no time you will find out that Ch.c is the official Brazil basher in this forum, and we have exchange a lot insults over the years.

I am glad he is out of prison (in Switzerland) and they probably let him out early for good behavior.

You know bank fraud, and all kinds of banking shenanigans that they do in Switzerland - you know how it is....

Anyway, Ch.c hates Brazil for some reason, and he is always trying to put down Brazil in every way he can.

Sam, welcome to the real world "an eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth" .


Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 01, 2010

Sam Paris: Fair enough. Let's pick the names you suggested: Military Junta in Burma, or Robert Mugabe in Zimbabwe, or Omar al-Bashir in Sudan, or Islam Karimov in Uzbekistan, Muammar al-Qaddafi in Libya, Bashar al-Assad in Syria, Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, and the Pope.

Now under each name put 3 adjectives that describe their persona.

Let's see how this stack up.


*****


Ricardo: Robert Mugabe is a Moron.

And that has been my opinion about Robert Mugabe for a long time. This guy is a real piece of s**t.

Regarding the other dictators we can’t generalize the way you are trying to do. It is easy to attack most of these dictators, but most of the time they become dictators because of drastic socio-economic circumstances affecting their countries.

Another important factor is the education level of the population and many other factors come into play.

Even benevolent dictatorships can get out of line like the Catholic Church: including the 8 crusades (caused the death of millions of people), and the Spanish Inquisition comes to mind.

You have a better chance to be a benevolent dictator in a country such as Brazil – including all the resources that we have in Brazil, plus a reasonable share of the population has a minimum level of education, the intellectual human capital, the size of our country, its location in our planet, its population in relation to the size of the country, the rate of population growth, the impact of the past history of our country on our people – from the experience of slavery to the foreign invasions that we had in Brazil, what is happening in the countries that border your country, and so on…There are too many variables that come into play and everything plays a role on your chances of having a benevolent dictatorship or not.

Basically, it is a very complex subject and not a subject that you pick dictators from different times dealing with completely different socio-economic circumstances and you try to generalize without taking in consideration all the other variables.

It is easier to be a benevolent dictator in Brazil and impossible to be a benevolent dictator in the Sudan, Ethiopia, and in many other countries around the world.

The current Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin is a special case in which he nationalized the oil industry in Russia after the crooks had pillaged the Russian natural resources that the Soviet Union had left behind – and by doing that he was able to improve the prospects for the Russian people in the coming years.

Based on everything that I described above Brazil has the potential of prosper and benefit from a period under a benevolent military dictatorship.

Brazil has every going on its favor and the future looks great. But Brazil has a major problem that the government has to bring under control related to the criminal gangs, and the narco-traffic, and only the military today is capable of bringing that kind of problem under control and reestablish law and order, harmony, and stability.

.
Reply to Ricardo:
written by Sam Paris, May 01, 2010

Question: (Assuming the military takes charge of the country and mounts blitz against, say Rochinha and Morro Alemao.)

You wrote your piece based on your conviction and because you want to, at least in part, be a part of the solution instead of just being someone watching on the sidelines watching Brazil’s crime and lawlessness drama unfold.

Surely, I assume you're prepared to Practice What You Preach and Walk the Talk; am I correct?

As such and given your trust on the military as the repair man of Brazil's bankrupted social and legal engine, would YOU be the first to volunteer to dawn a uniform and step to front line in an eventual armed combat with the drug lords? Or would just (now that the Militia is control) would just stand on the sidelines, holding the coats of the poor, brave young men and women in our military, and watch them trade fire, wreck death and destruction on each other, innocent included, and die themselves?

Now, from what I understand you reside in the USA and are relatively isolated from the ripples and repercussions associated with an eventual overthrow of Brazil’s democratic government.
However, assume a different perspective and imagine that because military dictatorships are by nature law unto themselves, they, through some twisted reasoning decide somehow your name pops up as one to be arrested during the law and order sweep because in some way, because your name and ancestry notwithstanding, there’s reasonable evidence that you in fact are behind or are connected with the drug trade. Now, pause here before you react. Dictatorships are a law into themselves and they need no probable cause to prove you guilt.
This is hypothetical and far-fetched, but probable, because innocent people have been murdered by such regimes everywhere, including during such period in Brazil. What I am after here is to changing roles and becoming a being a victim of the benevolent dictatorship rather than the usual beneficiary.
Despite your innocence, your great family name and your accolades, they still find that you stand guilt or must be made an example.
Would you be prepared to step forward and declare that for the sake of the greater good and in support of this necessary evil you are willing to make the sacrifice? Once again; you are NOT the beneficiary here. You are a victim! Do you still want to put them on driver’s seat of our nation?
Reply to Simpleton
written by Sam Paris, May 01, 2010
I was trying to see if Ricardo could describe them with three simple lines but what I got was a disclaimer.

Based on that disclaimer what he appears to be essentially saying is that Hitler was correct in gassing the Jews as his (Hitler's) final 'benevolent solution.'

There were millions of Jews accused of crimes ranging from pety theft, larceny to threats to the Germany's national security. Along with the Jews, other fringe "races" were thrown in the fray for good measure; say give the Polish, Russians and so on. (Remember, it took a massive display of power from a democratic coalltion of nations to defeat Germany.) Why, because until the roles were reversed, millions of Germans backed Hitler up and were underwriters of his 'necessary evil/final solution' campaigns.

That's why I asked Ricardo to put himself in the victims role to get a greater insight into his thinking. Let's what we get.
Unilateral Perspective
written by Simpleton, May 01, 2010
Great points and counter points. Sam, we're going to put you right up there on the pedestal of truth and honor with our ever so eloquent writer Lord Loydd.

No, Ricardo will not adopt a self depricating stance not even for a moment - it's not in his breeding. That said, that corruption in the democracy and corruption in the dictatorship will in fact exist he will not deny. That a benevolent one (one that I must agree that the current day Brasil military has the potential to produce with the priciples of servitude / best interests of the union at heart) might more readily tackle or reign in some of the most destructive exterior forces (or at least somewhat mollify the negative effects) that are invading / hurting the society as a whole is plausible although the collateral damages may very well be as you have identified. Sending someone's son (or daughter) off to be in harms way or to die is / will / must be the case regardless of whether the democracy to promote a good and proper future does it or the generals do it. Being as international forces and influences are at the top of the chain behind these things as some of our other bloggers have pointed out (FARC for one, the Swiss and Israeli's come to mind as well) - why should this not be on the mission list for those constituded specifically to defend our country? Are war's in the traditional sense or countering physical invasion their only part and role? Just look to the comedy of cooperation, coordination, lack of mutual advisao and notifications between the state's sponsored policial institutions - I have seen first hand what the undercover Policia Federal will involve themselves in and what they will ignore, the PMs ditto, the Guardia Municipal ditto and to a lesser extent others even though they know each other and are standing right there on the same block. Nobody is stupid really, they are just of a more passively corrupted nature that the leadership provides as the example of how to be. Just say this is Brasil.

How about one of you history buffs helping out with my seriously defective education - question is how many two star plus brigadeiros have held the highest democratic office in the US (being duly elected to such without significant amounts of corrupted practices at the ballots)?
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 01, 2010

Sam Paris: “I was trying to see if Ricardo could describe them with three simple lines but what I got was a disclaimer.

Based on that disclaimer what he appears to be essentially saying is that Hitler was correct in gassing the Jews as his (Hitler's) final 'benevolent solution.'

There were millions of Jews accused of crimes ranging from petty theft, larceny to threats to the Germany's national security.”


*****


Ricardo: You are getting desperate with your argument.

It is silly for you to bring Hitler, and the Jews or Stalin and what happened in the Soviet Union to this conversation.

Germany and the Soviet Union had a complete different history than we had in Brazil, and complete different circumstance.

We had 8 years of a dictatorship of Getulio Vargas from 1937 to 1945. And we also had 21 years of military dictatorship in Brazil from 1964 to 1985.

During almost 30 years of dictatorship in Brazil please tell me how many Jews were gassed by these Brazilian dictators? How many blacks? How many mulattos? How many people guilt of petty theft, or larceny? How many Italians? How many Germans? How many “anything you want” was gassed by these Brazilian dictators?

You are in the entertainment business, and many people on your line of business take illegal drugs on a regular basis.

Are you afraid that a new military dictatorship would clamp down on illegal drug use by the people on show business?

You are afraid the military dictator would exterminate anyone who takes illegal drugs, possible like yourself?

How many thousands of people you are aware that the dictators in Brazil have exterminated at any time?

Please don't give me this BS about dictators that have nothing in common with our history in Brazil.

The only comparisons that might be relevant to this conversation is if you had mentioned the Argentinean Junta, or General Augusto Pinochett, and even Hugo Chavez does not meet your criteria to be a nasty dictator.

The military used to go after communists at one time, but today only trouxas still believe in communism, if anything we need to be sorry for these leftovers from another era.

Today there are only 2 communist countries in the world: Cuba and North Korea.

After Castro dies Cuba will change their economic system. And before you know the 2 Koreas are to merge into one country.

You don’t need to be a rocket scientist to figure out that a new military dictatorship in Brazil it would not pay attention if they still have any communists around Brazil.

Who Cares about these poor guys who don’t realized as yet that communism has died many years ago – including in China, and in the Soviet Union.

You also said: “That's why I asked Ricardo to put himself in the victims role to get a greater insight into his thinking. Let's what we get.”

Now you are calling the criminal gangs and the narco-traffickers of victims.

What’s wrong with you?

.
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 01, 2010

Ricardo: In the movie “City of God” - “Cidade de Deus” – Based on what your saying I assume that on your book the drug dealer is the victim on this movie.

http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0317248/

.
The "military" already are reclaiming the favelas
written by Brazuca, May 01, 2010
Ricardo, I appreciate your concern about the druglords, but the favelas are routinely being reclaimed by the authorities as it is. It's basically a walk in the park. BOPE make their unassailable entry, followed closely in support by choque police/soldiers -- and the place is back in government hands, the traffickers arrested or escaped. Often shots don't even need to be fired, as happened in the most recent police invasion in Tijuca; and the police remain permanently, insuring that the traffickers don't return, and give the state the opportunity to provide social services and otherwise fill the vacuum the druglords had been filling.

It's working well. As I said, more often than not nowadays in Zona Sul, I see most policia militar not bothering to wear their bullet-proof vests and looking very naked from how I used to see them only a few months ago kitted out like SWAT team (often with rifles in hand as well).

So you say that the military need to invade the favelas to take power from the druglords; but the military are removing the druglords from the favelas. The policia militar is, as the name would suggest, part of the military. And their very impressive elite squad BOPE simply has no trouble taking the favelas. So impressive are these BOPE that in the 10 months or so I've been in Rio, and with the traficantes having the tactical advantage of holding the high ground and being familiar with the terrain, I don't recall an occasion on which BOPE have taken a loss, the traficantes always ending up second best in a confrontation. And BOPE is always raiding favelas -- hundreds of times a year! These guys are good. And they're evicting the traffickers from each favela one by one. I think Zona Sul (except for Vidigal) is now free of traficante-run favelas.

Go Tropa de Elite!
Reply to Ricardo:
written by Sam Paris, May 01, 2010
Well, Ricardo! Brazuda did the job for me in replying to your verbal onslaught.

Now let's make this clear...a thing I'd ask we settle on. We're engaged here in a fari-minded debate on Democracy (I wish to preserve) vs. Dictatorship (you wish to restore). At that, I'd impose on you to refrain from distorting our health conversation by implying that because I am in showbiz (and in showbiz) people take drugs...therefore I am one of them. I was born with brains and have never and would never try such silly crap to get a kick-out-life.

I explained clearly my piece about my childhood and my background somewhat. It was tough, trying and in many ways, many times, the light in the end of the tunnel often was just another train coming. But through it all, and amid the hardship, drugs, booze, cigarette smoking has never been part of my history. My only vice is...and will always be (God forgive me) a lady with a nice, generous pair of twins protruding from her chest, narrow hips, long toned legs, a firm, tight ass, and what she hides between her legs-which is the source of my constant expedition into the wild jungle of babes.)Now, I get high on that!

So if we can debate this without you implying drug use to my person, much obliged!

Finally, my asking you to role play (and assumed it was going to be easy for you to grasp) was to see whether you'd be standing with the benevolent dictators once they, for whatever reason, rationalized that you are a target, came and got you, bent you over on all fours and the proceeded to nail you, nail you, nail you! Perhaps your lips are itching to scream 'Benevolent Dictators' would never do such a thing, right?

But I am certain you understand my point. So I want my exchange with you be of service to the Brazilian people, rather than be seen as gross form of 'how to waist your time.' If we can agree on that great! If not, I'd rather spend my available time getting laid by some of the world's greatest babes. Just follow work to see what I mean!
No longer run by traficante
written by Simpleton, May 01, 2010
Yes Brazca, you are painting the very real and current story / situ and properly noting recent laudable improvements / progression that is ongoing. The PMs are up in the favelas / the running of things by the traficantes that were there is being reduced but since that's where the PM / BOPE are and they are effectively keeping the bad guys out what's realistically happening is they are just being pushed down into the lower streets where you find considerably less protection than before due to the resource commitments. The "normal" people are suffering much more / experiencing such a huge increase in problems you have to wonder what's really been fixed by this "sucessful" program / campaign - trading problem sets is a bit of ticklish issue - those that are being caused to suffer by it where as they perceive they did not before don't view it as hugely beneficial / magnanimous. Are they being just short sighted with focus on the present moment and state of things, things that affect them immediately / directly? Right now they'd rather have things like they were before where the bad guys and traficantes really had little if any negative effect on them other than occasionally being unlucky in the onibus or trem or more unfortunately for some having to pass through Central or drive Linha Vermelha no madrugada.
Reply (in part) to Simpleton
written by Brazuca, May 01, 2010
"what's realistically happening is they are just being pushed down into the lower streets where you find considerably less protection than before due to the resource commitments."

Then why are the police on the street taking off their bullet-proof vests if there is now "considerably less protection" there? Remember that new police have been recruited expressly for the purpose of manning the new UPPs. It's not like pre-existing police are being removed from the streets and being placed in the favelas.

Having said that, in many cases the military can be seen to be more reliable in having the country's best interest at heart. The article linked below highlights the concern amongst military circle (which I've already referred to) of foreign interests wishing to hobble Brazil's development by funding domestic groups that will unwittingly do their work for them.

http://www.defesanet.com.br/04_09/gf_18abr10.htm
...
written by Glaucia Wagner, May 01, 2010
Great rebuttal, Mr. Paris

Factual and beautifully written. In response to those who irresponsibly defend the dictatorship, thankfully here arises a voice of reason defending the ideals of freedom and democracy.

I also grew up in Brazil during the military dictatorship, experiencing its ills first hand. It was a period marked by political, economical, social and cultural stagnation. The economy conditions, in particular, were disastrous: hyperinflation, relentless worsening of income disparities, high unemployment levels and supine acquiescence to the dictates of the IMF, which aggravated even more the suffering of the Brazilian people.
The levels of crime and violence were as unacceptable then as they are now. Thus, Mr. Amaral’s belief in the military ability to control the violence is illogical and unsupported by historic evidence. What the military controlled very well was political opposition, not violence.
And, yes, the military dictatorship was a criminal regime. If depriving citizens of their freedom without due process of law, if torturing, killing, and forcing thousands to exile are not crimes, then what is?

I hope you become a habitual here, Mr. Paris. I have been an observer in this site for years, and your posts have been one of the most intelligent and articulate I have seen here.
Thank you also for keeping your gracious attitude, by keeping the high road and sticking to the argument despite some contemptible comments, such as those ridiculously suggesting that the fact that you are an artist and entertainer would somehow make you less qualified to express your point of views.
Cheers

GW




An example of the deeds of the "benevolent" dictatorship
written by GW, May 01, 2010
from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vladimir_Herzog

Vlado "Vladimir" Herzog (27 June 1937 – 25 October 1975), was a Brazilian journalist, university professor and playwright of Yugoslavian origin. He also developed a taste for photography, because of his film projects. Although his birth name was Vlado, he adopted the pseudonym of "Vladimir", for considering his real name very exotic for Brazil.
In October 1975, Herzog, then editor in chief of TV Cultura, was tortured to death by the political police of the military dictatorship, which later forged his suicide. His death had a great impact on the Brazilian society, marking the beginning of the redemocratization process of the country. According to journalist Sérgio Gomes, Herzog is a "symbol of the struggle for democracy, freedom, and justice".
On 24 October 1975 – when Herzog was already editor in chief of TV Cultura – Army agents summoned him to testify about his connections with the then illegal PCB. The following day, Herzog went to the DOI-CODI in order to comply with the summons. His interrogation, however, was conducted through a torture session. He was arrested with other two journalists, Jorge Duque Estrada Benigno and Leandro Konder, which later confirmed his beating.
On 25 October, Herzog's body was found hanging in his prison cell. Although the official cause of his death is "suicide by hanging", there is a consensus in the Brazilian society that he was tortured to death. The DOI-CODI officers would have placed his body in the position it was found in order to inform the press that he had committed suicide. There are several facts in the photos of Herzog's dead body that prove the impossibility of a suicide attempt.
Generating a wave of protests from the international press, and initiating a process in defense of human rights in Latin America, the death of Herzog boosted the movement against the military dictatorship in Brazil
Ernesto Geisel was also upset by these and other actions by what he called the "criminals" of the largely parallel power of military-directed violent political repression. As a result, he ordered a clean-up and reduction in these activities, firing the main ultra-right wing general behind it, Ednardo D'Ávila Melo.


Reply to Glaucia Wagner
written by Sam Paris, May 01, 2010

Glaucia your comments and commendment of my person and profession are priceless. I'd hope that people like you would rise to power in Brazil and steer our nation towards its manifested destiny. That of Greatness and National Glory drawn from the grandeur of the Brazilain spirit.

There's a greater Brazil (dictators-free) embedded in the heart and soul of each Brazilian. I believe that; including Mr. Amaral's. He, like many like him, just don't know it yet!

There's a simple and immediate solution to massively reduce crime and lawlessness in Brazil. We can discuss it, if anyone really cares about it!
...
written by João da Silva, May 01, 2010

Ladies and Gentlemen,

I am still awaiting some answer to the question put forth by Costa:

In my view, there is no such thing as a benevolent dictatorship. All dictatorships are based on intimidation and/or oppression of the masses!


Sure everyone brings in Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Mugabe & umpteen dictators who probably did not know to locate Brasil on the world map.But...but...Ricardo´s entire message is based on the fact that we need a "benevolent dictator" from the Military to beat the hell out of the drug dealers. He does not take into consideration that according to our constitution, it is the job of the Governors of each state.

Rev.Sam Paris has raised some very interesting questions in his article and I suggest everyone re-read that again.




Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 02, 2010

Sam Paris: However, assume a different perspective and imagine that because military dictatorships are by nature law unto themselves, they, through some twisted reasoning decide somehow your name pops up as one to be arrested during the law and order sweep because in some way, because your name and ancestry notwithstanding, there’s reasonable evidence that you in fact are behind or are connected with the drug trade.


*****


Ricardo: On your example you were implying that I am involved in the drug trade in some way.

I can reattribute the favor by using your profession on a similar example.


*****


Sam Paris: Now let's make this clear...a thing I'd ask we settle on. We're engaged here in a fari-minded debate on Democracy (I wish to preserve) vs. Dictatorship (you wish to restore). At that, I'd impose on you to refrain from distorting our health conversation by implying that because I am in showbiz (and in showbiz) people take drugs...therefore I am one of them.


*****


Ricardo: It is fair for you to use me as an example, but when I use you as the example then you complain that I am not being fair with you.

Next time think twice before you use me as your example.

.
Dearest Ricardo
written by Simpleton, May 02, 2010
Please understand that SP is only asking you to "mentally" assume a situation that has nothing to do with the "real" you, your laudable past, your ongoing fight for a better future based upon all you know, believe, have experienced and cultured others to take up voice and gather about at the tahenna. What he asks is for you to role play (being a completely innocent person in such matters) and find yourself "accused" by the political armature / silence all contrarians element that does crop up within any military junta whether it be "authorized" or not and uses such false accusation tactics to serve towards their end / goal. Once you have (so unfairly and unproven) been so accused and put into such hole as you can never hope to escape (assuming you live long at all) - only then, from that position / posture / perspective of one in such a situation (as many found themselves over time immemorial), please tell us your "then" view of the "benevolent" dictatorship that effectively did such unto you.

I think you really should take the "exercise" / "challenge" and make up the list of three adjectives you would ascribe to each of individuals on the list of names provided. Focus only on what you know / think of that particular individual and their heretofore "record". (If you feel you don't have much knowledge on a given individual then just skip that name.) After making that list, do as suggested and figure out whether each of the adjectives you chose is something you would really want also to be what your kids, grand kids, neices, nephews and so on to "rise" up to be publicly known and admired for in their lifetime.

Paz

LUIGI - A$$HOLE O MIO....
written by fried CHC, May 03, 2010


You know what they say.... When in Rome, act as the "ROMANIANS" do...... HEHEHEhehehe.

I love you man!

Costinha

PS: Simpleton, button down that flapping upper lip of yours, goofy, you dingleberry-brained chuckling chump!
CHC - The gayman with Itchie GenItalia
written by fried CHC, May 03, 2010


... living north of Italia!

I swear, if you don't shut the f.u.c.k. up, I'll finger-f.u.c.k. your eye sockets, get a bowling ball grip on your pumpkin head, and throw you back into the gutter where you belong.

Now then, welcome back!

Costinha

smilies/grin.gif
CHC – The Chronic Herpes Carrier
written by fried CHC, May 03, 2010


The gayman with itchy genItalia, living north of Italia!

So I see, I got paroled huh? What is your parole officer’s name?

A longer continuing period of silence would be most welcome on your part.

Your Costinha
Reply to Ricardo:
written by Sam Paris, May 03, 2010
Ricardo: It is fair for you to use me as an example, but when I use you as the example then you complain that I am not being fair with you.


Next time think twice before you use me as your example.

*************

Ricardo! One of the definitions of the word 'assume' is: Take on a certain form, attribute, or aspect. And one of the definitions of the word 'imply' is: Suggest that someone is guilty.

What I asked you to do was to assume a scenario (or pretend) a situation in which you are protagonist of the events I described.

However; on April 28 you wrote this.

Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 28, 2010

Are you involved in the narco-traffic in any way?

You are in the entertainment business, and a lot of people involved on that line of business are free spirit, and many take drugs on a regular basis just for recreation.
************

Now that to me is a direct implication in which you based your question in context with my profession and inferred generally the 'guilty by association' strategy to score a point.

Now who spoke before thinking here?

You see. When we started dissecting Democracy vs. Dictatorship, I kept thinking that our exchange would rest on the foundations of two consciously enlightened platform, and that the debate, although heated, edgy and apparently adversarial, would not weer off from the norm expected from highly academic and well-evolved minds.

And that it would steer away from the tendency of the common man (who when in the face of intellectual complexity) regresses to his Neanderthalistic, automated tendencies. That of summoning his fight-or-flight response when cornered or challenged.

Deprived of mental and intellectual logistics, all our quasi-man, man could and (those still in existence can do) was to assume his natural humanoid posture and let it prevail when offended, startled or auto-matched. It was and still is the ONLY way for him to deal with something as stressful as invoking the discipline required to remain objective, conscious and rational. Thus, his may even decide that at last resort he may even howler, kick, scream and bite.

Juxtapositioning that analogy to our very public debate; if we ought to continue this conversation, I impose on you to allow it to be something that Alfred Nobel would recommend for a Prize in Elevated Intellectualism.

For, though vastly in contrast with my values and the values and ideals of millions, I imagined you a man gifted with admirable attributes and eloquence.

But name calling, chicanery, deceptions, non-sequitur. insults and mis-characterization is just plain to infantile. And is again, a gross waste of time!

If; when attempting the overthrow of an argument, one refuses to rely on facts and guide his reasoning through layers of objective context then one's only option is to rely on mysticism. And mysticism is the disease that overcomes reason and leaves the individual impotent to rescue and ultimately piece to together his faltering sense of reality. And a mystically diseased mind, when unable to find answer often creates a phantom solutions to confront his dilemma. Unfortunately it creates a problem where none previously existed.

At that, I encourage you to use fully integrated honesty on this conversation, take the test I've put before you and let world know exactly how it must view and regard you.

Again, you are not being asked to be a drug dealer, a dictator or the common man. Just a honorable someone fallen victim at the hands of (given their anatomy)'benevolent dictators.'

Kindly!
Licentura
written by Simpleton, May 04, 2010
SP you are truely amazing. Thanks for giving us all licence to be simply human except on (unfortunately) rare occasions by force of will we rise above that.

Now to digress, Costinha, I basically have no upper lip so for it to be flapping is more or less impossible. No problems keeping things stiff though. Given your phenotype I'm sure you are well aware of what all guys dream of you doing for them. Buzz off chato eu nao quero sua servicos.
Simply Tom
written by fried CHC, May 04, 2010


Absolutely nothing wrong with my phenotype. On the other hand, your genotype is what I am mostly concerned with… it reminds me of the movie “Gorillas in the Mist” with Sigourney Weaver.

If I throw you some fresh bananas do you promise me to go away?

Hugs,

Costinha
Practice makes perfect
written by Simpleton, May 04, 2010
Sorry, no chance of me honoring your request Costinha. I wouldn't want the bananas you offer since you use everyone of them to maintain your lip phenotype in tip top shape. Besides, since they are fresh bananas I suspect that makes you drool even the more. Now go back to the rain forest and rejoin your ancestors. If national geographic is accurate, all your family members there, male / female, young / old will happily accept your lip services.

Por favor fica curta.
Simpletom(á no cú)
written by fried CHC, May 04, 2010


How R U, Viadu?

From the love between a crack-head woman and alcoholic man, came you. Let me ask you something:

Do you have a lot of blank thoughts from time to time?

Do you find challenging playing Dominoes by matching the number of dots?

After spending hours looking into the void and thinking of absolutely nothing, can you do brain farts?

Last question: If I gave you a blank piece of paper and labeled point-A somewhere on it, and then, in the same piece of paper but in a different spot, I labeled another one and called it point-B. Now, if I was to ask you to connect those two points, how long do you think it would take you to complete the task?

Beijos na Bunda,

Costinha
Bring back Lloyd Cata.
written by Ederson, May 06, 2010
This site was a lot more interesting and educational when you had Lloyd Cata, Joao, and that guy from South Africa moderating it.
Ederson
written by João da Silva, May 06, 2010


Dr.Cata is on strike. That guy from South Africa must be busy flying rescue missions over Congo. I am on hot pursuit of alternate "benevolent dictator" candidates who will satisfy both Sam Paris and Ricardo Amaral. If you have some names, please do let us know.smilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

Option B
written by Simpleton, May 06, 2010
Although if he accepted the mission there would clearly be a few who would rightfully experience less than benevolent retributive acts, our former candidate to lead the takeover, Forrest, should not be delisted. Certainly he would meet all Ricardo's requirements. How to get Sam to compromise his ideals just a small amount and see that the ends would justify the means might be a bit tricky.
Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 06, 2010

Ricardo: Your question is completely unrealistic – your expectation of a “benevolent dictator” is someone who would be a saint, with a perfect benevolent record on everything.

That is wishful thinking and nothing else, and even the people that we think as “benevolent dictators” they had to make some rash decisions at a certain point, but we judge them by the final results that they accomplished over time. And there is always some collateral damage along the way when you are trying to achieve the desirable goals that would be very good for society on the long run.

You want perfection where there is no perfection and you need to take in consideration the alternative and its disastrous consequences. On your judgment, your expectation from a “benevolent dictator” it is pure utopia.

Democratic system everywhere are having a terrible time fighting back against the illegal drug trade including the United States, European countries, Mexico, Colombia, Afghanistan, and so on…

There are more illegal drugs than ever that are available all over the United States, and it is easier for any kid in the United States to get hold of illegal drugs than to get hold of alcoholic beverages.

The United States has over 2.3 million people in prison today, and more than half of these people are in prison on illegal drug related charges, at an humongous cost for the states in justice system, and prison costs – and many states in the US today spend more money with their prison system than with their educational system.

Sometime in 2007 I was watching the Larry King Show on CNN cable and he was interviewing the Police Commissioner of 3 major towns in the Unite States, I believe they were New York City, Los Angeles, and Philadelphia, and this is what they were talking about: “Today the United States has more than 2 million people who belong to gangs all across the United States – and at the same time the United States has only 1.8 million policemen to keep these guys in check.

These gangs used to be concentrated on large cities, but in the last few years they realized that they can expand their reach very easily, and they started moving all over the place including your neighborhood.”

When this widespread cancer spreads around the country there are many economic consequences related to money laundering and the local economies – including corruption, and unfair competition to people who are in business legally.

You are so afraid of the possible imaginary repression that a “benevolent dictator” could cause – on the other hand when the criminal mafias rule you better follow their rules or they would kill you and your entire family. Talking about a bunch of ruthless people they are on the top of the list.

If you want the drug traffickers and their criminal gangs to rule things in Brazil and eventually Brazil becomes no different than Mexico – if you think that is a better choice then what I can say to you. That reminds of a saying in Brazil: “Quem e burro pede a Deus que o mate e ao diabo que o carregue.”

The choice in Brazil today is not between being a “Democracy vs. Dictatorship” as you want to distort the reality of my article.

The realistic choice in Brazil today is between being a “Benevolent Dictatorship” or being ruled by fast growing corrupt and cancerous criminal system that includes powerful druglords, and criminal gangs calling the shots and terrorizing the Brazilian population.

You are not defending democracy with your point of view, in reality you are defending a cancerous criminal system that have to be destroyed before it undermines and destroy the entire socio-economic system in Brazil.

A benevolent military dictatorship in Brazil is not going to be as bad as you think, and that option might be the missing piece that will help leapfrog the Brazilian socio-economic system to join the elite countries of our planet – in education, state-of-the-art technologies, economic development, and high standard of living.
.
Let me clarify one point...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 06, 2010

When I said: "The realistic choice in Brazil today is between being a “Benevolent Dictatorship” or being ruled by fast growing corrupt and cancerous criminal system that includes powerful druglords, and criminal gangs calling the shots and terrorizing the Brazilian population."

I am not talking about president Lula and his current government, since I actually like and admire president Lula.

I am talking about "the real thing" the actual criminal gangs and druglords.

Ederson
written by João da Silva, May 07, 2010

Dr.Cata is not on strike. He is debating with Ricardo under latter´s article! I might join them once the new server of this magazine is activated and starts working at full throttle.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
Reply to Ricardo:
written by Sam Paris, May 07, 2010
FORGET THE PURPLE COW!

I am not waiting for the Second Coming of great Benevolent Dictatorship of any kind! Not matter what color, shape or form! Neither are millions of 'terrorized Brazilians.'

Of that I am certain!

Now, there's no doubt that the drug problem is a menace and its consumption and its side effects on the individual and societies keeps democracies everywhere dancing on the edge of a volcano. And even the slowest third grader can pretty much figure out that most certainly, the increases in drug commerce and consumption have us seating under the dark shadow of something about to topple.

However, along with drugs, why not throw in poverty, illiteracy, graft, elitism, crony-ism, nepotism, racism, Nazism, anti-Semitism, sexism, alcoholism, this ism, that ism, domestic violence, bureaucracy, so forth and so on.

As you can see (perhaps), the Brazilian social/political/judicial anatomy (like many democracies – old and young) suffers from various forms of terminal cancer. Still, only drug production and consumption have been made illegal and therefore profitable to both side of the turf. And as such, merits (in your view) the ‘justifiable’ use of the Armed Forces to keep the nation from self-imploding.

In your reply you wrote…and I quote you: “The realistic choice in Brazil today is between being a “Benevolent Dictatorship” or being ruled by fast growing corrupt and cancerous criminal system that includes powerful druglords, and criminal gangs calling the shots and terrorizing the Brazilian population.”

Upon reading the above quote, one can readily assume you know who the individuals behind the fast growing corrupt and cancerous criminal system that includes powerful druglords, and criminal gangs are.

In that case, it’s puzzling why you haven’t yet provided intelligence to and volunteered as a consultant with the Brazilian federal government and even summoned the CIA and the FBI to assist you in a creating a strategic course of action for an eventual all-out sweep across the nation, instead of using Military Kingpins to trample the Constitution, usurp the individual rights of the majority of Brazilians who are law-abiding citizens and thwart the hard-earned progress of the nation?

But what is realistic to ponder is; given your knowledge of the drug situation, of its operators and your zeal and eagerness to usher in the messianic dictators to deal with it; shouldn’t you pick up your bags, hop on plane and jet to Brazil and offer to position yourself at the front line of the war on drugs? After all, as you just said “and there is always some collateral damage along the way when you are trying to achieve the desirable goals that would be very good for society on the long run.”
Then I see you will have no problem in joining the melee and maybe even fall as one among the casualties.

You see. It’s far too easy to be a couch justiceiro when someone will do your heavy lifting. To call on the military to take over the country while you are at a safe distance, watching from a HD wide-screen, sipping coffee, feet on the table, puffing a cigar (perhaps) is as easy as falling off a log. But it’s hard to verify that your arguments in favor of Dictatorship hold water.

Strangely though, looking at the situation in Brazil of the moment, Time magazine has just named President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva – Brazil’s incumbent and charismatic leader the world's most influential leader. Brother Barack Obama is ranked fourth and (there are only four heads of state or government in the list)

More tellingly, Time has never selected a Latin American leader as person of the year. Outside the United Stated of North America (yes I call it USNA) only Mahatma Gandhi made the cut…and that was way back in 1930.


So, if you are serious about getting rid of the drug/crime problem and preserving Brazil’s freshly rediscovered identity and self-made progress you must come forward and walk the talk. Roll up your sleeves and go join the battle to save Brazil from the hands of its terrorizers.

To me and I am sure to many, the drug/crime problem in Brazil isn’t the cause but rather the effect. Deal with the cause (s) of the problem and the problem will puff away. Simple.

Speaking of which; there right now, easy, viable, bloodless; viable and freedom upholding and protecting solutions to cure all of Brazil’s ailments.

Stay tunned!
Further still...
written by Sam Paris, May 07, 2010
The country, best known just 20 years ago for its runaway inflation and death row economy and whose currency had less value than the paper thingy used in the game of Monopoly, is the today a major veto player and policy enforcer to the point where without whose willingness to play along, significant global initiatives become paralyzed or dead on their tracks. It’s institutions and social development template under President Lula has grabbed the world’s attention and it’s refusal to comprise on its democratic principles, as shown in last year's Honduran crisis, raised its stature as a force to be reckoned with in the eyes of the world.
number 2 man in farc arrested in brazil
written by asp, May 07, 2010
http://odia.terra.com.br/porta...79712.html

no matter what side of this debate one is on, you cant sluff off the farc as some of the big players in this game of drugs arms and corruption.

if there is no real attempt to follow the trail of where crack cocaine, which is an absolute plaugue where i live, is coming from , it is all idle talk.

paraguay also has some very corrupt people funneling arms and drugs into brazil

marijuana should be legalised, people shouldnt be going to jail for that. crack cocaine absolutly devastates society.

the farc need to be addressed in brazil. i keep bringing in the truth over and over, and here it is again
...
written by asp, May 07, 2010
people have to understand that there are forces set in effect about 10 years ago with serious hook ups with huge rio drug gangs and the farc. soon after, the pcc from sao paulo were doing business with the farc.

this bust was for things in the amazon.

this river of cocaine has been set up to flow into the country and , in rio alone, drugs are a million dollar a day business.

its hard to get people to stop that kind of business on all levals, unless some really radical and creative thinking is put into action.

its a lot more than just "help the poor"
Do we have a declared winner yet ?
written by fried CHC, May 07, 2010


Who have gotten the most punches, Sam or Ricardo?

These ego trips are long and painful... Take a rest boys!

May life treat you kindly,

Costinha
To the Junkie Ricardo belonging with pride to the Amaral Dynasty
written by ch.c, May 08, 2010
My prison time ?
Great. Truly Great.
I went to Santo Domingo, Mexico (Acapulco and Puerto Vallarta), California and Florida. And St.Martin and St-Barth.
Ahhh....ahhhh....IDIOT !


And my country with a 7,8 millions population ?
DONT WORRY AT ALL !
WE are still exporting and importing as MUCH as the mega Brazil with its population of 200 millions SUPERSTARS !
Ahhhh....ahhhh

The difference being that you export NO or LOW value added products, such as Iron ore, grains, cheap low quality meats.
AND WE export ONLY HIGH TO VERY HIGH value added products.
We even produce Very good products IN BRAZIL, using OUR MONEY, OUR technologies and know how and expertises.
NESTLE alone has 28 manufacturing plants in BRAZIL...if you did not know.
Where are the Brazilians experts producers ?????? UNABLE to produce the Nestlé quality products that Brazilians are willing to buy ?????

Better yet, our services sector generates HIGH surpluses !
All in all, our Current Account (Trade & Services) SURPLUS is UNSURPASSED ON EARTH, wether you like or not.
Ahhh...ahhhh....

Last but not least, in 2009 our government ended with a BUDGET SURPLUS, contrary to 99,5 % of countries on earth.
Ahhh...ahhhh !
And our DEBTS to GDP is one of the lowest on earth, even lower than Germany.
Ahhh....ahhh

therefore and hopefully you understand why the SWISS FRANC is a SAFE HAVEN CURRENCY at times of crisis ! And contrary to the Brazilian model of providing the World Highest Interests Rates ...after inflation, to maintain value on its currency , my country provides one of the LOWEST rate and still have a VERY strong currency.
Guess who the best is.
If you cant figure that out, then ask your entrepreneurs.
Or ask Robbing Hook why HE still borrows in NON BRAZILIAN CURRENCIES !!!!
Ahhh....ahhhh

And despite what Lucinda suggested in another thread, sorry sorry for her, but in my country we had Nooooooo sub-primes mortgages, and no real estate prices slump !
Is Lucinda another brazilian junkie talking about what she DOESNT KNOW...and is sure to be RIGHT ????
Ahhh...ahhhh !

Keep borrowing at the Brazilian rate !! 42 % AVERAGE...all in all !
In Brazil the motto is....BUY ONE....BUT PAY TWO...OR THREE !
In Switzerland the motto is....BUY TWO OR THREE...BUT PAY ONE !


Ohhhh...I red recently that there is a Brazilian General having the name of AMARAL !!!!!!
Probably a member of your Dynasty !
Thus writing that you are Not politically motivated is a PURE LIE.....Ricardo THE JUNKIE AND LIAR !

Pray God that I will be "jailed" AGAIN where I have been in the last several months !!!
Because TRUE, I love more sun ! Something that is missing over here ! Especially in the AUTOMN & WINTER season...BY DEFINITION !
And 6 months there, 6 months here, or so, would be my best jail cell !!!!
AGREED !

Ahhhh....ahhhhh....ahhhh....ahhhh !

And for Costinha with her new ID of Fried CHC, it is well known that trannies enjoy to be Fried BACK AND FORTH !
Enjoy COSTA during daylight and COSTINHA at night !
Do you wear high heels, mini skirt, no string and full of make up....while WORKING AT NIGHT ?
Just call Sarney, he will invite you in his Bunker !
Over there there is a regular guest with the nickname (not to be officially recognized) of....Robbing Hook !
You will recognize him...he has a beard !

With smilessssss

Reply to Sam Paris
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, May 08, 2010

Sam Paris: However, along with drugs, why not throw in poverty, illiteracy, graft, elitism, crony-ism, nepotism, racism, Nazism, anti-Semitism, sexism, alcoholism, this ism, that ism, domestic violence, bureaucracy, so forth and so on.


*****


Ricardo: Because we had all that before, and we still could keep the peace, and a sense of law and order.

What changed in a drastic way it has been the illegal drug trade and all the violence, and social decay that comes with that type of activity.


*****


Sam Paris: In that case, it’s puzzling why you haven’t yet provided intelligence to and volunteered as a consultant with the Brazilian federal government and even summoned the CIA and the FBI to assist you in a creating a strategic course of action for an eventual all-out sweep across the nation, instead of using Military Kingpins to trample the Constitution, usurp the individual rights of the majority of Brazilians who are law-abiding citizens and thwart the hard-earned progress of the nation?


*****


Ricardo: The United States has been at war with the illegal drug trade since the early 1970’s and during that period the number of people in US prisons it has gone up from about 700,000 people to about 2.3 million people in prison in the US today. And the cost of police, bringing to court, and warehousing all these people has exploded and is creating a problem to the budget of a lot of states around the United States.

The ironic thing is that illegal drugs and the violence associated with that trade is more widespread than ever before.

You said: “volunteered as a consultant with the Brazilian federal government.”

I gave my opinion, on how to solve the problem on my article about a military dictatorship in Brazil.

I don’t know why my article was not clear to you?

I can’t make any clear than that.

.
Dictatorship Vs Democracy
written by João da Silva, May 08, 2010


During the past two weeks this magazine has published two articles written by our distinguished ex-pat Brasilians living in the U.S. Mr.Amaral pushing for a "benevolent" dictatorship and Mr.Paris defending the democracy. It has been an interesting debate and some bloggers including myself had asked some questions to clarify their respective lines of thoughts. We got some answers, but not to our total satisfaction.

One thing Mr.Amaral and Mr.Paris have in common is that they are totally happy with the way that our current President Mr.Lula is running the country, especially in the economic front and as regards the foreign policy. Their views are reinforced by the honors that are being showered upon by the International press like "Le Monde", "The Economist", "El Pais" and now the world famous TIME magazine. Needless to add that in the view of the entire world Mr.Lula has consolidated the democracy, during the past 7 years.Therefore, there is no need for either of the writers to repeat further, the virtues of our current President for the bloggers-at-large. The important thing to remember is that the democratic process as well as Mr.Lula´s policies have to continue. Another point to ponder is the one raised by Mr.Paris-the Brasilians in general are law-abiding, provided the top leadership sets an example and from what I gathered, both the writers seem to be happy with the leadership.

The only thorny issue is the drug related violent crimes and many bloggers have pointed it out several times. Our distinguished blogger ASP has mentioned about it many times before and has even come out with some concrete suggestions (like legalizing marijuana). In order to curb this violence, Mr.Amaral has come out with the suggestion of going back to "benevolent" dictatorship. ie. "Take no prisoner policy". My question: Is it worth it? I would think not. I am a great believer of electing through ballot strong leaders and kick them out when they do not perform. IMHO, a coup detat is not needed, but if Gen.Heleno chooses to candidate himself (He cant do it, because he is still in active service and our constitution forbids it), he will make an excellent President to continue the democratic process.

But..but..but.., I am quite sure that he is not going to stand for the job of our nation´s CEO, just to do the work of Rudi Giuliani. According to our constitution, it is the job of the governors of each state and they can call in the Federal help, when they cant hack it.

So my friends, it is up to the Brasilians to decide whom they elect democratically in the coming elections. If they are happy with Mr.Lula´s performance, they could elect his handpicked candidate as his successor. If they are not, they could vote for the opposition party candidate.

As for me, I ain't going to go for any candidate that constantly puts the blame on our military or foreigners for all our woes. Lets not forget that the military governed the country just for 21 years. For the past 25 years, we have been electing our reps. If we are not happy with our elected officials, it is time for kicking them out and bring in new people that place the interests of Brasil above that of their personal ones (or the members of their dynasties).



joao da silva speaks out !!
written by asp, May 09, 2010
here here !!

hit some nails on the head
Out of character
written by Simpleton, May 09, 2010
What happened to you the other day Joao? I've never known you to really put so much of yourself into your posts / be so verbose. I second our esteemed snake's ovation.

Only one minor observation to highlight - for those criticizing you in the past, let them take note of your assertion that you are not pretending / not coming from false sense of superiority / elevated caste or station in the grande scheme of our society there. You are the real deal and your use of "I ain't going to" speaks volumes and confirms totally your very humble proletariat background. Power to the people! (but not in the MST sense!)
Chinese advertising?
written by Ederson, May 10, 2010
Got up this morning, checked my favorite Brasil blog site, and discovered that it had been invaded by advertising for Chinese shoe and boot products. I guess the Chinese are going to walk over Brasil, too?
Ederson
written by João da Silva, May 10, 2010

I guess the Chinese are going to walk over Brasil, too?


In case you decide to open your wallet and go shopping, you would discover that our Chinese brethren are already walking over Brasil, though quite behind our European masters. smilies/wink.gif

The brand name for the products these folks in this site are peddling should be "Manolo BOLSHEVIK". The brand name and the products would come handy when the "Great March" begins soon. I am going to go down and buy myself to "Manolo Bolshevik" sandals provided I can afford them.smilies/sad.gif
Simpleton
written by João da Silva, May 10, 2010

Power to the people!


Yes, "Power to the people" can be made available without building "Belo Monte" dam.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
Providing
written by Simpleton, May 10, 2010
OMG Joao, I didn't think things had gotten that bad there for you alththough they did here for me recently. If you can't even afford the cheap chinese made sandals (vs havianas or better still the peru jellies) who possibly can? Despite all I just sent uma merreca to two families there who were basically wiped out by the landslides, flooding and injuries this past season. It seems maybe I may need to add you to my traditional xmas donations list.
farc bases in brazil
written by asp, May 17, 2010
http://www.estadao.com.br/noti...2510,0.htm

well, ive been talking about these things all the time, and, here it is

its really frustrating to make these points on here while there is so much tea and crumpets over whats going on about the empire

i mean, i dont know about you all, but, the major reports where i live about crime and violence from cocaine and crack, is much more relevant to what is hurting brazil than anything about the empire

but, i guess reality is no fun

awfully strange i havent heard it on network news yet....i sure hear about crack on the tv news , but, here is the actual proof farc is deeply involved in bringing it in to the country
hahahahahah just to think, loyld carta.....
written by asp, May 17, 2010
tried to remark about hamid karzai heroin going on in brazil

fantacy is so much fun , isnt it?
asp
written by João da Silva, May 18, 2010

awfully strange i havent heard it on network news yet....i sure hear about crack on the tv news , but, here is the actual proof farc is deeply involved in bringing it in to the country


Nothing strange about it. Please re-read what Rev.Paris wrote:

Thirty plus on, and still, the vast majority of the population are being fed the SAME archaic, brain shriveling TV programming.

In case you haven't noticed the state has just one group that prints all the newspapers which do not focus on major issues.

Time to hunker down and wither the storm.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif
joao
written by asp, May 19, 2010
finaly channal 10 had a good report, strangly globo didnt, but,globo did have a devastating report on last night about hundreds of crack users on train tracks in rio near the favelas....i mean just devastating....

its just so obvious how this all ties in , the vast network of farc with the major drug gangs, and, daily reports of crack busts where we live and something like the globo report on last night with hundreds of crack users

this is one of the major obsticles for brazil, now. i really hope they can confront this deep reality that is in major effect now and is eating away at the fabric of this marvelous country

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack