Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33087485

Who's Online

We have 667 guests online



Instead of Hoping for Marina's Nod Brazil Candidates Should Fulfill Marina's Hopes PDF Print E-mail
2010 - October 2010
Written by Cristovam Buarque   
Friday, 15 October 2010 00:56

Marina Silva Months ago, before Marina Silva decided to leave the Workers Party (PT) and become a candidate for President of the Republic, she told me that she felt a "calling from Brazil." At that time she certainly never imagined that her campaign - she received 20 million votes - would have such a great impact on the race and would cause Dilma Rouseff and José Serra, the two candidates headed for the second round of voting, to look to her in hopes of her endorsement.

Instead of "hoping for Marina's endorsement," each candidate should observe "the hope of Marina." They should understand what her hopes are in these days after the first round of voting.

While the candidates have hopes for what Marina will say, she should be hoping for what they will propose.

She should be watching which of the two candidates would permit her to make a legitimate choice in the eyes of her voters. If she chooses to remain neutral, she should be wondering how to justify this position to all the voters of Brazil.

While Marina may have a personal liking for one or the other of the candidates, at this point, she has, above all, a commitment to her proposals, her message, and her voters. Her support should form part of the calling that Brazil made to her.

Almost 50% of the voters chose Dilma to continue what has been done in the "Lula Years," but the 20% who voted for Marina said that they desired changes. By giving the majority to Dilma, the voters said that they wanted continuity. By denying her a first-round victory, however, they said that they were not voting for simple continuity, that they wanted changes.

Either they did not see the proposals that they desired in the other programs, or they saw these proposals but did not believe that they would be brought to fruition.

Some of the voters want to adjust the productive model to take environmental equilibrium into account and guarantee sustainability. They want to assure healthcare and high-quality education to all. They want to change the practice of politics to incorporate ethics, sincerity and a new rationality that is less a prisoner of the state or of the private sector and more committed to the public, less limited to the next election and more committed to the next generations. Another portion of Marina's voters desires to rescue moral values and not accept innovations that surpass certain limits.

Marina's voters will be won over through the adoption and clear presentation of what the candidate, if elected, will do to protect Brazilian nature from the depredation caused by economic growth. The candidate must declare to what sources of energy he or she will give priority, how to stimulate the economy and improve transportation without increasing the production of private vehicles.

He or she must state what measures will used to replace the GDP as the indicator of progress. The candidate must indicate which projects of law he or she will send to the Congress to enact the desired reforms eliminating the current practice of corruption in public activity and how to democratize the electoral process to avoid campaign finance dependency upon economic power.

He or she must explain how to radicalize the commitment to making Brazilian education among the best in the world, assuring equal access for each Brazilian from his or her early years, independent of family income or the city where the child lives. The candidate must set forth proposals to assure running water, sewers, garbage collection, preventive healthcare and medical services of the same quality for each person.

At the same time, the candidate must commit him or herself to not forcing changes in the customs and ethical values beyond the population's capacity of acceptance, respecting the rights of each minority, without offending sentiments of the majority.

Marina is hoping that one of the candidates will adopt her proposals, hoping for the certainty that this adoption will be the fruit of either conviction or conversion and not a marketing gesture.

Marina is hoping for all this, as are those who voted for her.

I believe that Dilma Rouseff, due to her history, her speeches and proposals, is closer to the desires of Marina's voters. Marina, however, is still hoping that Lula's former cabinet chief will explain the measures that will make her program approximate what the senator herself presented during her campaign to answer the "calling from Brazil."

Cristovam Buarque is a professor at the University of Brasília and a PDT senator for the Federal District. You can visit his website at www.cristovam.org.br/portal2/, follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/SEN_CRISTOVAM and write to him at cristovam@senado.gov.br.

New translations of his works of fiction The Subterranean Gods and Astricia are now available on Amazon.com.

Translated from the Portuguese by Linda Jerome (LinJerome@cs.com).



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (10)Add Comment
...
written by João da Silva, October 15, 2010

I believe that Dilma Rouseff, due to her history, her speeches and proposals, is closer to the desires of Marina's voters.


Do "Marina´s voters" share the Senator´s belief? We will know only on the night of October 31st.

Regardless, kudos to Mr.Cristovam for being reelected as a senator from DF for another term.
MARINA WOULD HAVE BEEN A GREAT PRESIDENT
written by Augustus, October 17, 2010
Despite my fears of Marina's leftist proclivities, UNLIKE THE INCOMPETENT, DANGEROUS, AND DECEPTIVE DILMA ROUSSEFF, Marina Silva's compentence, honesty and integrity would have represented a breath of fresh air for Brazil.

Hopefully Brazilians will continue waking up for the menace which Dilma Rousseff AND her deceptive political party represent, and elect the LEAST OF TWO EVILS, voting for Mr. Serra.
Augustus
written by João da Silva, October 17, 2010

LEAST OF TWO EVILS


Might work out that way! But...But...But... you never listened to ole sábio, da Silva.smilies/cheesy.gif

Regardless, great to hear from you again.smilies/smiley.gif
Marina's Neutrality
written by DU 48, October 18, 2010
Marina is right to maintain her neutrality.It puts more pressure on Serra and Dilma to spell out,if they can, their policies.

Marina's voters are giving their warning.
Public opinion in Brazil is changing very fast- faster than many of the politicians imagine.

What Mr Buarque should concern himself with is how can Brazil ever deliver policy without electoral and party political reform.

For example,how about adopting a district voting system to make the politicians LOCALLY ACCOUNTABLE?

Politicians in Brazil don't know the meaning of the word accountability!
...
written by João da Silva, October 18, 2010

Public opinion in Brazil is changing very fast- faster than many of the politicians imagine.


It is a positive sign, isn't it?

For example,how about adopting a district voting system to make the politicians LOCALLY ACCOUNTABLE?


Could you please describe briefly what this "district voting system" is?
augustus........
written by asp, October 18, 2010
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!

come back in here and give some people a spanking...
...
written by Jaboo, October 18, 2010
District voting is where your candidate is elected from a geographical area. It is usualy based on population of the district.
Like for example in rio the camara would have representatives from say Barra, Tijuca, Jacarepagua etc. Its a requiremente they have to live in the community. State and city legislatures are formed from wards and districts in the same manner.
The benefits of this are obvious. Your politicians are your neighboors, they are more accessable and look out more for your communities interests.

Dilma needs to do exactly what lula did and thats not $@%! any thing up. And be aware that she will be dying of cancer soon and we will have count dracula for president.

http://www.micheltemer.com.br/
...
written by Fabio, October 19, 2010
Marina's proposals are too ahead of a presidential election just now, but she'll be there somehow. As Prof. Buarque I think Dilma's proposals are closer to Marina's expectations from a next federal government.
Electoral reform In Brazil and TVBrazil censorship
written by DU 48, October 21, 2010
Actually living in the constituency area makes sense-after all, if the elected politician wants to keep his/her seat then it is in their interest to involve and inform those who voted- and remember the politician represents the WHOLE community/constituency, including those who didn't vote for the candidate.
Thanks anyway to Jaboo's comment above.

Here's an example of how political censorship appears to rule the day in Brazil.

http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/poder/818095-jornalista-de-goias-reafirma-censura-em-tv-publica-e-diz-que-vai-sair-da-emissora.shtml
...
written by João da Silva, October 22, 2010

It is amazing to read how a "respectable" International magazine changed its tune after the first round of Presidential elections!smilies/cheesy.gif

http://veja.abril.com.br/notic...jose-serra


Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack