Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33087474

Who's Online

We have 753 guests online



For Brazil China's Growing Influence Is as Much a Bless as a Challenge PDF Print E-mail
2010 - November 2010
Written by Melissa Graham   
Monday, 08 November 2010 23:15

Lula with Chinese leader China's economic involvement in Latin America reached an all-time high last month when Beijing was able to gain a large stake in the Brazilian petroleum market. The deal, brokered by Chinese petroleum company Sinopec, allows the Spanish firm Repsol to turn 40 percent of its Brazilian oil stake over to the Chinese state corporation.

Worth USD 7.9 billion (1), the agreement has prompted other countries in the Western hemisphere to reevaluate China's ever-changing economic and political role in Latin America. Recent events highlight the seriousness of China's drive to stake out a major economic presence in Latin America, as well as a readiness to use economic methods in order to achieve its goal.

Brazil holds one of the largest reserves of oil in the world, totaling an estimated twenty billion barrels in land and offshore deposits. (2) The majority of Brazilian petroleum remains under the control of Petrobras, the state-funded oil producer. In 1997, the Brazilian government began to take steps to overhaul its oil industry and revitalize its economy.

In addition to creating such regulatory bodies as The National Petroleum Agency (ANP), and the National Council of Energy Policies, the government instituted "Law N. 9.478," which opened Brazil's oil to foreign investment. These reforms have attracted the attention of a number of foreign investors to the country's lucrative oil resources.

As China's second largest oil company, Sinopec is no stranger to extensive foreign investments; in 2009, the company purchased Addex Petroleum, based in the United Kingdom, for USD 7.2 million, (3) thereby gaining reserves in both the Middle East and Africa. China's recently increased interest in foreign oil is to be expected, considering that the country's dramatic economic rise as a consumer society during the past decade has created an insatiable demand for energy resources.

Indeed, China's GDP for the second quarter of 2010 surpassed that of Japan, which has long dominated trade between Asia and Western nations. Chinese trade with the West totals USD 1.337 trillion, which has transformed China into the second largest economy in the world. (4) Sinopec's increasingly aggressive acquisition of foreign oil reserves reflects the Chinese government's serious commitment to expanding overseas influence, and is a cornerstone of China's global economic and political strategy.

China Replaces U.S. in Latin America?

Since developing stronger ties with Latin America, Chinese imports from the region have increased by an extraordinary 600 percent, totaling USD 21.7 billion in 2004. (5) China's mounting interest in Latin American markets is an attempt to meet the demands of its ever-rising population and economy, which grew an unprecedented 25 percent over the same seven-year period in which the U.S. economy (currently Latin America's largest trading partner) grew 20 percent. (6)

Some do not consider Beijing's interest in Latin America as an entirely positive development. The U.S. is closely monitoring China's expanded role in Latin America, a region that it has historically considered its "backyard."

Like many developing countries, China undervalues its currency so as to encourage rapid economic development that is frequently associated with cheaper trade. (7) This move has generated much criticism of the Chinese Premier Wen Jiabao for his reluctance to increase the value of the Yuan, given its now stronger economy and market shares. (8)  Consequently, China has been able to formulate agreements and offer interest at rates that are lower than other competing developed countries, including the United States.

A Washington Post article reported that "in some cases, China has handed out billions of dollars at less than 1% interest; under OECD (Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development) rules...the United States must lend at market rates." (9) Thus, China remains a more logical partner for many Latin American countries struggling to become greater players in the global economy.

China's influence in Latin America's economy has expanded through other, more indirect, avenues as well. China recently loosened Latin American travel restrictions on its citizens, a decision that will, undoubtedly, promote further economic ties between the two. China's latest dealings have been described as part of an "aggressive push to invest in industries overseas...to bolster the country's image and political influence." (10)

This is particularly evident in the case of Brazil. China's investment in various sectors of the Brazilian economy, such as a large port factory in São Paulo, is strategically fashioned to boost the volume of Chinese exports to Brazil. Constituting the so-called "BRIC" countries, along with Russia and India, Brazil and China are predicted to be increasingly important players on the global economic stage. In a sign of things to come, China replaced the United States as Brazil's largest trading partner at the beginning of 2009. (11)

The Political Persuasion: China's Effect on the Americas

In addition to its heightened economic influence in Latin America, China's political presence is growing in the region as well. As China continues to grow as a global power, the topic of Taiwan's sovereignty becomes the elephant in the room. Currently, twelve Latin American countries still recognize Taiwan's sovereignty. The loyalty of these countries, which include Panama, Paraguay, and Guatemala, could shift away from Taiwan as China invests more time and money in the region and plays a stronger role in their economic growth.

A shared concern among those that recognize Taiwanese sovereignty is that Beijing still "clearly wishes to diminish Taiwan's formal and informal ties to Latin America." (12) If China continues to gain political clout in Latin America this fear may prove to be valid and become a contentious issue in the region between those who favor a Chinese political and economic presence and those who do not.

Many Latin American leaders are carefully weighing the positive and negative political implications that China's growing involvement may have in the region. In March, Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa "compared China to the worst imperialist corporation ... and refused to bend on terms for financing a US$ 1 billion hydroelectric dam." (13)

Despite initial opposition, Correa eventually agreed to China's conditions after recognizing that the dam project would fall through if he continued his unyielding insistence for more favorable terms. Correa's climb down demonstrates the overbearing power that China can exert on Latin America's governments.

Another concern is that China's increased interest in the region, largely driven by its need to secure new markets for its products, will not have tangible benefits in Latin America. Brazil's outgoing President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva hinted at his skepticism over the potentially one-sided nature of the Sino-Latin American relationship this past July: "the truth is that sometimes they win a mine contract and they bring all these Chinese to work, and this doesn't generate opportunity for work in that country." (14)

This concern was previously raised in 1996 when Brazilian Ambassador to Beijing, Roberto Abdeneur, suggested that China might be "more of a challenge to Brazil than an opportunity." (15)

China's growing influence in Latin America will continue to raise questions regarding its role in the region's economic development. If the past decade is any indication, China's unprecedented power will continue to bring considerable economic growth to the Latin American region.

Yet valid concerns exist regarding China's potential to misuse its influence. At present, a number of Latin American leaders' are seeking greater independence from the United States. It remains to be seen, however, whether China's increased presence in Latin America will aid these efforts or simply transfer external power from one economic giant to another.

Notes

(1) http://technews.tmcnet.com/topics/associated-press/articles/106321-repsol-sells-stake-brazil-unit-71b.html

(2) http://www.country-data.com/cgi-bin/query/r-1744.html

(3) http://www.thefreelibrary.com/Sinopec+buys+Addax+for+7.2+billion+US+dollars-a01611909386

(4) http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-08-16/china-gdp-surpasses-japan-capping-three-decade-rise.html

(5) http://italy.usembassy.gov/pdf/other/RS22119.pdf

(6) http://129.3.20.41/eps/dev/papers/0512/0512002.pdf

(7) http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704689804575536022547062314.html

(8) http://www.investopedia.com/articles/07global_trade.asp

(9) http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2010/07/25/AR2010072502979_3.html?sid=ST2010092006580

(10) ibid. Washington Post.

(11) ibid. Washington Post.

(12) http://carnegieendowment.org/files/latin_leap.pdf

(13) ibid. Washington Post.

(14) ibid. Washington Post.

(15) ibid. Washington Post.

Melissa Graham is a research associate at the Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA) - www.coha.org. The organization is a think tank established in 1975 to discuss and promote inter-American relationship. Email: coha@coha.org.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (22)Add Comment
I am not surprised by what is going on between Brazil and China
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 09, 2010

Ricardo: China has been using many of my articles published on Brazzil magazine as a blueprint for their investments in Brazil.

.
A "Reality Check" for the United States
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 10, 2010

“China's Dagong Lowers U.S. Credit Rating on Fed Monetary Policy”
By Joshua Fellman and Ye Xie
Bloomberg News - Nov 9, 2010 9:33 PM ET

China’s Dagong Global Credit Rating Co. reduced its credit rating for the U.S. to A+ from AA, citing a deteriorating intent and ability to repay debt obligations after the Federal Reserve announced more monetary easing.

The credit outlook for the U.S. is “negative,” as the Fed’s plan to buy government debt will erode the value of the dollar and “entirely encroaches” on the interests of creditors, analysts at Dagong, one of China’s three largest ratings companies, said in a statement. The U.S. is rated Aaa and AAA by Moody’s Investors Service and Standard Poor’s Corp., the highest credit ratings of the New York-based companies.

The downgrade came before a meeting of leaders of the Group of 20 nations this week in Seoul and as the U.S. steps up pressure for China to let the yuan strengthen to help reduce the U.S. trade deficit. China countered the criticism by saying U.S. economic policies threaten the stability of developing nations.

You can read the entire article at:

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/...-says.html

.
A "Reality Check" for the United States
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 10, 2010

“ Decline of US empire will reshape our world”
By: Leon Gettler
The Sydney Morning Herald – November 10, 2010

Other states are on the rise, and the US has squandered its economic power.

MID-TERM elections in the US have traditionally been a poke in the eye for presidents. Before Obama, it happened to Clinton, Bush, Reagan and Truman. But this time around, it feels different. It is another sign of an empire in decline.

The insurgency against Obama reflects a rage against the erosion of American hegemony, its superpower status slipping away, driven by 9.6 per cent unemployment, people losing homes and no let-up in the worst economic crisis since the Great Depression.

Obama has achieved a lot, such as healthcare reform and staving off a depression. But the slippage continues; he was administering chemotherapy on a dying patient.

The decline of the American empire will be felt around the world, by business and society including Australia. It could take decades, but it will reshape our world. As anthropologist Jared Diamond writes in his book Collapse: How societies choose to fail or succeed (Penguin 2005), many civilisations share a sharp curve of decline. It's a common pattern. "Indeed, a society's demise may begin only a decade or two after it reaches its peak population, wealth and power,'' Diamond writes.

All empires, not matter how powerful, must come to an end. Nothing lasts forever. Economic historian Niall Ferguson associates imperial decline with fiscal crises where governments must service a mountain of public debt.

You can read the entire article at:

http://www.smh.com.au/business...17m78.html

.


...
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 10, 2010

By the way, "The Sydney Morning Herald" is a newspaper from Australia.

.
Grand statements!
written by adrianerik, November 10, 2010
Amaral, I have no problems with someone supporting the CONCLUSIONS of another, but that does not mean that this person's article supported his conclusions with facts.

I read the article and the author seems intent in comparing the American economy with IMPERIALISTIC economies during the days of colonization. Do you agree that they are the same? For example, Spain's economy was not based upon a productive society with unleashed innovative potential among its citizens. It was built upon stealing gold and resources from the Western Hemisphere. When the stream of gold ended, so did Spain.

The same for France, whose wealth was built upon its holdings in the Caribbean, particularly the island of Hispanola (Haiti and the Dominican Republic) which outproduced the entire caribbean combined. With the loss of this cash cow the French empire began to crumble.

America's economic growth was predicated upon three things. 1) the giving away of land to settlers to allow the pioneer spirit to develop firebursts of economic life throughout the West. 2) The industrial revolution which solidified its internal domestic market, which in turn, created a thriving working and middle class which created a thriving synergy with growing businesses.

There was no economy based upon stealing gold and sugar cane. And that seems to be the author's basis for comparison with other former empires. The issue is not which country have natural resources but which cultural has the technological innovation to take advantage of these natural resources. In Brazil, the rubber trees were just trees until America created the process of vulcanization (hardening) of rubber so that may be used to make tires and other hard rubber products.

In Trinidad their tar pits were only used to repair ships until the industrial world began to build highways.

So, while I agree that America's economy faces HUGE obstacles I don't see any parallel to the fallen empires of Spain, France, Portugal, etc. These were not value-added economies.

Regarding national debt. That is an issue. But according to Keynesian economics, it is not something to be avoided altogether. You have to project your "expected returns" based upon the debt incurred. The entire infra-structure development of America, initiated by FDR, was based upon huge national debt. But those highways and electric grid development not only created jobs for the short term but they also spurred economic growth up to this current day.

The business of national debt for a country is almost the same as borrowing to invest for a company. No company can grow if it only relies on its profits for that current year.

So to use that as the indicator for an country's decline ignores many business practices. Of course, there are differences in what constitutes "expected returns" on debt. Health care and education versus infra-structure development. Which benefits a country more?

I believe that you wrote on another thread your disdain for higher education investment in Brazil.

Right now, China is a threat only because of the game that it plays: a controlled yen, kept low to invade other countries' markets with exports but at the same time, closing its own markets, while trying to make big leaps in innovation by stealing the intellectual property of other countries. Right now, no one wants to write off China's 1.3 billion. But if a protectionist war starts, though it will hurt everybody, China will fall quickly back into early third world status.
good points adrian...
written by asp, November 10, 2010
hey, amoral, you better just hope that china doesnt f**k brazil in the ass
asp
written by João da Silva, November 10, 2010

you better just hope that china doesnt f**k brazil in the ass


For a f**king American, you are not a bad fellow, old chap.smilies/cheesy.gif
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, November 10, 2010

By the way, "The Sydney Morning Herald" is a newspaper from Australia.


I didn't know that is a newspaper from Australia, Ricardo. Thanks for the infosmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
Here is the new reality check for the United States
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 12, 2010

In a Nutshell:

Here is the result of QE2 plus G-20 meeting in South Korea
http://www.youtube.com/user/NM...GYAhiMwd5E

.
Bernanke's worst nightmare: Ron Paul
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 12, 2010

Bernanke's worst nightmare: Ron Paul
By Chris Isidore, senior writer
CNN Money - November 12, 2010

NEW YORK (CNNMoney.com) -- Ben Bernanke has had his hands full since his first day on the job as Federal Reserve chairman nearly five years ago. It's about to get even tougher.

His harshest critic on Capitol Hill, Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, is about to become one of his overseers.

With the Republicans coming to power, Paul, who would like to abolish the Fed and the nation's current monetary system, will become the chairman of the House Subcommittee on Domestic Monetary Policy.

If you've never heard of the committee before, you're not alone. But Paul promises you'll be hearing a lot more from it.

"It's basically been a committee that's dealt with commemorative coins. I'm going to deal with monetary policy," he said.

Paul doesn't think he'll be able to move his proposal to eliminate the Fed, or to allow Americans to use gold instead of paper money as currency. But he said he does intend to use his new position as "a mini-bully pulpit" to criticize Fed policy and call more attention to what he sees as its negative consequences. And he's confident that American voters are ready to delve into those monetary policy questions.

"Five years ago they wouldn't have listened. Now they will," he said. "We've gained a lot of credibility in making the Federal Reserve an issue since the market collapse."

And Paul vows to try again to authorize Congressional audits of the Fed's decisions on the economy, a proposal that passed the House last year but was essentially gutted from the final version of the financial regulatory overhaul legislation.

"It will never be easy; the Fed has a lot of influence," he said of the audit legislation. "But there's a lot of life to it. We got further along than I ever expected."

One way that Paul will bring pressure on Bernanke and his Fed allies is to hold hearings to give greater voice to Fed members – like Kansas City Fed President Thomas Hoenig -- who disagree with the current monetary policy.

"Just getting someone there willing to discuss their viewpoint and why they might dissent, I think that would be interesting," Paul said.

A Fed spokesman did not respond to a request for comment for this story.
Some economists worry that Paul having that kind of pulpit will hurt the Fed, and diminish its ability to fix an economy that still needs help.

"From Ron Paul's standpoint, the Fed can't do anything right," said Lyle Gramley, a former Fed governor who is now senior economic advisor to the Potomac Research Group. "He can cause the Fed to lose a lot of public support. But it needs public support to do what it needs to do."

While the Fed policymakers will try to resist pressure from Paul, they won't be able to ignore it, said John Silvia, chief economist for Wells Fargo Securities. And he said there's a potential for that pressure to influence Fed policy.

"The Fed has a more balanced, nuanced position on its dual mandate to promote growth and keep prices stable," he said. "Ron Paul probably doesn't."

But other Fed watchers say Bernanke already faces plenty of criticism and doesn't have too much to worry about from Paul having control of an oversight committee.

"I think that Bernanke has been pretty cool under fire up to now. I can't imagine Ron Paul being someone who could shake him up," said Michael Bordo, a professor of economics at Rutgers University.

Paul also rejects the idea that he's Bernanke's greatest concern.

"He probably just thinks I'm a nuisance rather than a nightmare," he said.

And Paul doesn't think he'll be able to reverse Fed policy or force Bernanke to resign, as much as he would like to.

"I think psychologically, Bernanke is incapable of changing his mind," he said. "It's probably unlikely [Bernanke will resign] under today's circumstances. But you don't know what it will be like a year or two from now."

Paul argues the Fed is making a serious mistake by pumping more money into the economy to try to spur more spending and growth. He predicts it will only lead to further declines in value of the dollar, inflation and higher interest rates rather than the lower rates the Fed is shooting for.

Paul thinks that will bring about another economic crisis that will eventually force Bernanke to resign from office.

"That's more likely to happen than for Bernanke to think, 'Well, I guess I made a mistake for 35 years. I've misunderstood the Depression, and I'm going to change my policy.'"

http://money.cnn.com/2010/11/1...t+Popular)

Guido Mantega should be the number one worst nightmare
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 12, 2010

Ricardo: Ron Paul will become the second worst nightmare - Guido Mantega should be the number one worst nightmare.

I am going to write an article to show why Brazil has to act immediately regarding the devaluation of the real and become a fixed currency pegged to the US dollar and the yuan.

.
.
Guido Mantega should watch this video.
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 13, 2010

This video gives a very good explanation regarding QE1 and QE2.

In a Nutshell:

Quantitative Easing Explained

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...r_embedded


*****


Goldman Sachs is it a Cancer or just a Parasite of the US financial system?

http://www.elitetrader.com/vb/...did=195957

.


Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, November 13, 2010

Guido Mantega should be the number one worst nightmare.


What do you have against poor Guido, Ricardo? I like him, even though he is an Eytalian-Brasilian. I think Madame Rousseff should make him the President of BC.
Reply to Joao da Silva
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 13, 2010

Ricardo: I don't have anything against Guido Mantega. I also like Guido.

Guido Mantega should be the number one worst nightmare for Ben Bernanke and the United States.

That posting was talking about Ron Paul being the worst nightmare for Ben Bernanke.

Guido Mantega will be the worst nightmare for Ben Bernanke and the United States, when he implements the currency plan that I described -
After the G-20 fiasco in South Korea it becomes imperative that Brazil implement ASAP a 30 percent devaluation of the real before the Brazilian government adopts the new fixed exchange rate system of pegged currencies against the US dollar and the yuan as I suggested on other postings.

There's no time to waste - and Brazil has to catch the market by surprise – the global “currency wars” are right on schedule since these guys didn't decide anything in South Korea and they will not be able to decide on the future as well - the only thing that makes these guys to take some concrete action is when it's too late, and they are forced to react to a major crisis.

.






US Power
written by America, November 15, 2010
I hate to break it to you, but the US isn't going anywhere no matter how much people wish it. People have been talking about the mythological American decline for decades. The US still has a larger economy than the BRIC countries combined and is still by far the world's most advanced military. Alot of that is merely wishful thinking. We will remain the pre-eminent economic,military,cultural, and political power for decades to come. If latin america wants to build a huge trade surplus with China that's their business. Frankly latin america isn't that important for the US. Brazil will be a great power, but never a superpower. Latin America will always take a backseat to Asia, Europe, and the Middle East for the US. I would have thought the world would have known by now to never bet against the US. Americans will answer this challenge the same way we answered similar challenges for the last century.
Reply to America
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, November 15, 2010

Ricardo: After you take the time to read the information on these two web locations then you will realize how the United States is becoming completely "impotent".

And your arrogance will melt like ice after this nice dosage of the new reality regarding the United States.

Military spending, collapse of US Empire
http://www.facebook.com/profil...=853794209


The sad reality of the US job market - 21 Percent Unemployment
http://www.facebook.com/home.p...=853794209

And have fun after you wake up from your current delusional state!!!!!

.
Meet the new boss, same as the old boss..
written by China Inc. see big profit in Brazil, November 20, 2010
I like the final understated conclusion:
Yet valid concerns exist regarding China's potential to misuse its influence. At present, a number of Latin American leaders' are seeking greater independence from the United States. It remains to be seen, however, whether China's increased presence in Latin America will aid these efforts or simply transfer external power from one economic giant to another.


I also think Lula nailed it when with the quote about how Chinese contracts to build bridges, railroads, dams etc, typically import Chinese laborers to do the job, which contributes little industry and work.

Also a brilliant quote by the Ecuadorian president:

In March, Ecuadorian President Rafael Correa "compared China to the worst imperialist corporation ... and refused to bend on terms for financing a US$ 1 billion hydroelectric dam."


Indeed, China Inc. is the worst imperialist fascistic repressive corporate nation the world has ever faced. Just look at how they ruthlessly torture and abuse their own people and tell me why would any expect to treat Brazilians any better. This country has been hijacked by a ruling elite that has no compunction about torturing and exploiting their people, and not interest democracy or human rights. Granted Latin America should be shifting away from its centuries of exploitation by multinationals (many US dominated) but jumping into the arms of China is like jumping from the pot into the fire. At least the US has the veneer and rhetoric of taking democracy seriously, which despite domination by the super rich, has had the effect of preserving certain rights and privileges of the working and middle class. I see no model for development, democracy, or advancing of cultural growth or the quality of life for most average people in the world coming from China. I think Obama was correct to recently highlight the common cultures of the US and India, another developing giant, but one committed to democracy and an open society. The same could be said about the commonalities of Brazil and the US, but many on this site get into demonizing and sadistic schadenfreude in taking pleasure in the US troubles, drooling over their imagined collapse and demise (pitiful). I am waiting for contradictions in China to eventually challenge the fascist order there. In the meantime, Brazilians, like many of the world are smart to question the motives of China. I have heard silly talk here about the US invading Brazil and stealing the Amazon. China is showing you don't need to invade Brazil to steal all it's resources: just find the right corrupt and powerful elites to deal with and they will sell off Brazil's resources for a song.
asp
written by João da Silva, November 20, 2010

China is showing you don't need to invade Brazil to steal all it's resources: just find the right corrupt and powerful elites to deal with and they will sell off Brazil's resources for a song.


The commentator "China Inc" sounds like our comrade-in-arm Dr.L.C.smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gif

huh, joao ?
written by asp, November 20, 2010
no, loyld cata would lead the chinese in ...as long as its not the usa...he and moan chumpski could really do lunch together

thats is all the usa did, was do business with the elites in brazil to get at recources. the anti americanists think the usa invaded with armies and took the riches..at least that is how they sound...

"but many on this site get into demonizing and sadistic schadenfreude in taking pleasure in the US troubles, drooling over their imagined collapse and demise (pitiful). "

you aint kidding about this "china inc"

but then again, anybody with brains knows this site is filled with fiction and fantacy
asp
written by João da Silva, November 20, 2010

thats is all the usa did, was do business with the elites in brazil to get at recources. the anti americanists think the usa invaded with armies and took the riches..at least that is how they sound...


It is all another blah...blah...blah... Bro. Nobody wants to talk about the Germans (Not the Brasilian-Germans) exploiting the poor Brasilian labor. Heard of Hans Sauer? Probably you were too young to remember that fella.

But...but...our new "Chinese connection" is a God given opportunity. Guess why? smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif
...
written by Rafael, November 21, 2010
China's economic influence over LatAm is very limited. People tend to attribute LatAm growth to commodity exports. The fact, however, is that such growth is spurred largely by domestic demand, that is, it doesn't depend on trade with either China or other countries. The only LatAm country one can think of as dependent on commodity exports - and thus on trade with China - is Chile: a country whose exports account for more than 40% of its GDP and who exports mainly copper. This has been the subject of a recent study by S&P.


http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/6059be3c-edfe-11df-8616-00144feab49a.html#ixzz15xHVCpWP

Even the very fast recent growth of exports to China has had little impact on GDP growth – in fact, the authors point out, quite the opposite:

“In China ... net exports still contribute significantly to GDP growth. Conversely, in Brazil, net exports only made a positive contribution to GDP until 2004. After that, investment growth (and its corresponding impact on imports) diminished the importance of the external sector. Net exports have actually had a negative contribution to GDP growth ever since.”

Unless LatAm countries really become economically dependent on China, that country will not be able to extend political influence over the region.

@America
Yes please, do your stuff in the Middle East or East Asian and keep pretending LatAm doesn't exist. We'll thank you for we no longer want any more coups in our countries.
...
written by Heart Disease, August 21, 2011
China continues to make power moves, while the US continues to weaken. It will be interesting to see if the Republicans take back the White House.

Dora

causes of heart disease

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack