Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33088164

Who's Online

We have 687 guests online



Brazil: The Shame of Being the World's 7th Largest Economy PDF Print E-mail
2011 - April 2011
Written by Cristovam Buarque   
Monday, 18 April 2011 19:17

Paraisópolis favela, São Paulo, BrazilIn the 19th century, Victor Hugo refused to shake hands with Pedro II, the emperor of Brazil, because he was the ruler of a country living comfortably with slavery. Today, Victor Hugo would not shake the hand of a Brazilian to congratulate him for achieving seventh position among the international economic powers while living so comfortably with the surrounding social tragedy.


With the exception of six countries, we are ahead of all the world's countries in the value of our production, but we are unconcerned about our position, according to UNESCO, at 88th place in education.

We are the seventh in the value of our GDP, while ignoring the fact that we are, according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the 55th country in the per capita income, making us a power inhabited by poor people.

Even worse, we do not see that, according to the World Bank, we are the world's 8th worse country in terms of income concentration, better only than Guatemala, Swaziland, the Central African Republic, Sierra Leone, Botswana, Lesotho and Namibia.

We are the world's seventh economy, but according to Transparency International, due to corruption we are in 69th place in the order of countries with ethics in politics. The perfect grade is 10; Brazil has a grade of 3.7.

We are the seventh power in production, but, when we examine our production profile, we become aware that for decades we have exported nearly the same type of goods and we continue importing the modern products of science and technology.

We are one of the greatest producers of automobiles; yet we have one of the largest populations of flanelinhas, young male school dropouts who are paid by drivers to watch their cars parked in the streets.

A UNESCO report released in March shows that the majority of the world's illiterate adults live in only ten countries. Brazil is one of them, with 14 million, with the added aggravation that, in Brazil, which has a national flag inscribed with the words "Ordem e Progresso," they cannot even recognize their own flag.

From 1889 to today, we have reached the seventh position in the world in the economy, but we now have almost three times more illiterate adult Brazilians than we had in that year, besides our 30 to 40 million functional illiterates.

We are the seventh economy and we do not have a single Nobel Prize.

According to a study of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), which researched 46 countries, Brazil remains in last place in the percentage of young people completing secondary school.

We are even worse shape when we take into account the training necessary to face the challenges of the 21st century. According to the International Labor Organization (ILO), our teacher remuneration lags behind countries like Mexico, Portugal, Italy, Poland, Lithuania, Latvia and the Philippines.

Their preparation and dedication is probably in an even more unfavorable position due to the low quality of the schools where they are obliged to teach.

We are the seventh economic power but of our children's school attendance, in hours per day, days per year and years over the course of a lifetime, is among the worse in the entire world.

In addition, we certainly have the greatest inequality in each person's education, depending upon the income of the student's parents. The 10% richest Brazilians receive educational investments nearly 20 times greater than the 10% poorest.

We are the seventh power, but we have illnesses like dengue fever, malaria, Chagas and leishmaniasis. Some 22% of our population lives without running water and more than half without sewerage connections.

According to the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics (IBGE), 43% of Brazilian homes, 25 million, are not considered adequate for habitation; they do not have the combination of running water, sanitary drainage and garbage collection.

This dichotomy - possessing one of the world's richest economies alongside a social world among the poorest - can only be explained because our national project is illogical, without foresight and without ethics.

Illogical because we do not perceive that "a rich country is a country without poverty," as President Dilma has said.

Without foresight because we do not perceive that our economy is great but backward, incapable of competing with the knowledge economy already established in countries with less wealth and more future.

And without ethics because, while we are commemorating our position in the economy, we are forgetting our shame in the social sector.

Cristovam Buarque is a professor at the University of Brasília and a PDT senator for the Federal District. You can visit his website at www.cristovam.org.br/portal2/, follow him on Twitter at http://twitter.com/SEN_CRISTOVAM in Portuguese and http://twitter.com/cbbrazilianview in English and write to him at cristovam@senado.gov.br.

New translations of his works of fiction The Subterranean Gods and Astricia are now available on Amazon.com.

Translated from the Portuguese by Linda Jerome (LinJerome@cs.com).

 



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (33)Add Comment
Stimulating thought
written by Simpleton, April 18, 2011
Joao, did our discussions on the other thread kick Cristovam into action here or was he just craving having ch.c return to the site so he could contribute his usual and say "Yessssss, Autogoooooalll Brazzeros!!!"? Just got word today that one of my cultivatable prospects is now spending the mornings with bate-ball and only the afternoons in school. Cripes sake, it's not even a municipal school and they're not giving him the in-class time he deserves (and someone is paying for, although not much).
Talking about being negative....
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 19, 2011

Ricardo: Cristovam Buarque got 1st prize with this article.
Joao da Silva and Ederson
written by Ricardo C. Amaral, April 19, 2011

Ricardo: You guys are going to enjoy the following lecture:

The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 1 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v...re=related


The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 2 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pb3JI8F9LQQ


The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 3 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CFyOw9IgtjY


The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 4 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yQd-VGYX3-E


The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 5 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t-X6EpvWWu8


The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 6 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3y7UlHdhAU


The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 7 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RyseLQVpJEI


The Most IMPORTANT Video You'll Ever See (Part 8 of smilies/cool.gif
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VoiiVnQadwE

.

...
written by João da Silva, April 19, 2011

Simpleton/Ricardo

Talking about being negative...


Has it occurred to you both the Sen.Buarque is as sarcastic as we are all? He is "chopping and chopping and no chips are flying".

Many of my friends that have known him personally in DF say he is honest in his crusade to strengthen the basic education. He got himself reelected easily last year as a Senator based on his willingness to address key issues and not by just patting his own back for his past performance.
Applaud
written by Simpleton, April 19, 2011
And so why aren't your friends that have known him personally helping our esteemed Cristovam in ensuring those in the DF get at least a basic education Joao? That would no doubt help more than any other crusade, a top down solution if you will.
Simpleton
written by João da Silva, April 19, 2011

And so why aren't your friends that have known him personally helping our esteemed Cristovam in ensuring those in the DF get at least a basic education Joao?


Because they are no longer in the field of education. smilies/cheesy.gif
Ricardo Amaral
written by João da Silva, April 19, 2011

Ricardo: You guys are going to enjoy the following lecture:


Thanks. I did enjoy the lectures.smilies/cheesy.gif
O artigo do Prof. Buarque merece uma sugestão
written by Rachel Kopit Cunha, April 21, 2011
Prof. Buarque,

Parece que o que ocorre no Brasil é um simples problema de amnésia. Governantes e políticos de todos os níveis, ao assumirem o poder, esquecem-se das promessas e compromissos que fizeram ants da eleição. Esquecem-se do coletivo e passam a trabalhar pelo bem dos seus próximos, próximos mesmo, e amigos. Enfim, de seus interesses. Que tal oferecer a estes cidadãos e cidadãs que, supostamente, deveriam se sentir honrados com a missão que lhes foi designada, um tratamento para não perder a memória ao assumir o poder? Pense nisso.smilies/smiley.gif
Hack no site
written by Simpleton, April 21, 2011
The site was apparently hacked/attacked again. My post yesterday was obliterated after having been registered, also posts of others on other threads. More anti-semetic activites or just malicious people with too much time on their hands?

Sra Rachel, eu concordo, nao e unico do brasil. Tudo mundo tem dessa problema com politicos. No futuro, o paises no middle east vai tiver mais mesmo.
Retrieved message
written by BrazzilMag, April 21, 2011
Since the hacking we had to change servers twice. Sorry for any lost messages. This one was retrieved from server number 2 (we are now at server # 3):

Lame but not Dead!
written by Simpleton, April 20, 2011
If your friends are no longer in the field of education which field did they get buried in and did that help restore the natural resources they consumed in their lifetime?

After watching the lecture (starting at the middle of the series as it is already 1 minute before 12, plus or minus two decades), I think I've concluded that ch.c is wrong. To be the most forward looking and proactive in forestalling the end, Brasil needs to cancel all the mechanical harvestor orders and put it's present and growing manpower reserves back into the cane. Entropy must change.
To Brazzil Magazine
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
So I’d like to share a word or two about firewalls. More specifically, their configuration and the responses they provide (or don’t) when they encounter traffic that is, shall we say, less than desirable. My goal here is to bring some rationality to the way our maligned little friends act on the wire, simplify our network troubleshooting, and maybe, just maybe, make it easier for you to convince management that the screws are a little too tight. Let’s make sure we frame this post properly.
To Brazzil Magazine
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
I am talking about, and a big fan of, packet filtering hardware firewalls. We’re talking about the layer four devices that sit on our network between the Internet and our internal network, between the DMZ and everything else, and sometimes even between sections of our WAN. They are both our first and our last line of defence, make sure that administrative misconfigurations don’t lead to incidents, and can provide us with great information about what’s happening on the wire. While my personal favourite will always be Cisco, I’ve used Juniper, Checkpoint, and others, and the concepts I am about to discuss apply equally to all, even if my vocabulary might seem Cisco-centric. While software-based firewalls (like Windows built-in firewall, ZoneAlarm, et al.) have their place and purpose, they are not a part of this conversation.
smilies/cool.gif
To Brazzil Magazine
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
Do we even want them anymore? YES! See the above paragraph. Firewalls are a key part of a defence in depth strategy, and act as a filter to block traffic coming into our network, or leaving our network, that we don’t want on the wire. They are also great at alerting us to the existence of that traffic, so that if we have an infected host on the internal network, we will know immediately if the box tries to connect to an IRC channel. As choke points, firewalls also offer us an excellent way to shun attacking hosts or compartmentalise different areas of our network, increasing our security posture. Just remember (and remind management) that they are not magical. Firewalls filter based on protocol and port. smilies/cool.gif
To Brazzil Magazine
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
An attack against a vulnerable web server over HTTP will fly right through a firewall that is configured to allow HTTP traffic to pass. Just ask all those Nimda infected machines out there how much good the firewall did them. A firewall should block protocols we don’t want on our wire, should prevent an admin from accidentally firing up an anonymous write FTP service on a DMZ host, and give us the juice to shun an attacker or infected host. It should not be looked upon as our only line of defence. When to block? Everything internal. Blocking packets means that the firewall responds to undesired packets with some sort of message back to the sender. Usually this is an ICMP UNREACHABLE (3,9 or 3,10) message, that includes the first several bytes of the offending packet. smilies/cool.gif
To Brazzil Magazine
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
A client will react immediately to such a message by stopping, and sending no further packets, as opposed to dumbly retransmitting as if that will help. If you are using a protocol analyser, you can see not only traffic is being blocked by the firewall, but what traffic is being blocked. With that you can go to the firewall admins to open required ports instead of continuing to wonder where the hell your traffic is going. Or, to put it another way…hey firewall admin! You know how every single time something doesn’t work on the LAN, some n00b blames it on the firewall? And how you get stuck with trying to figure out why it’s not working, since, you know, it might be the firewall? Dropping stuff on the inside network is why that happens to you. Start blocking instead, and you can throw it back at the apps guys with a simple question…‘did you see an ADMINISTRATIVELY UNREACHABLE? No? Then it’s not the firewall!’I hope you have found this article to be informative, useful, and perhaps even of help in convincing management of some things you’ve been saying all along. I learned all of the above the hard way. I’d like to hear from you if this saved you any pain or suffering, or even if you just finally found a kindred spirit.smilies/cool.gif
Who should manage them? NOT IT!(Well, actually, usually I am it, that’s why I can write this article.) This is a sticky question in a lot of environments. Is the firewall a security device, or a network device, or something in between? The short answer is that ‘it depends.’ The longer answer is that there is no concise and simple response, but these points should help guide you to an answer that works for your environment. More than one person-the worst situation you can find yourself in is the one that starts with a single person being able to do X, and ends with “they’re not answering the phone.” Only slightly less a bad thing than this is when you do have multiple people, but they work for different teams.smilies/cool.gif
To Brazzil Magazine
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
Conflicts of interest, playing “who did it?” and inconsistencies in how things are done are just some of the fun you can look forward to in that situation. If you have a dedicated security team with the expertise to manage the firewall, have them do it. If not, the network team is the next best choice. Only the most experienced-considering how much trouble a misconfigured firewall can cause, and how often the firewall is implicated in problems simply because it is there and convenient to blame, you want your firewall admins to be on their A game at all times. They need to understand networking, client-server application behaviours, to be able to take and read a trace, to white-board explanations to folks who don’t understand any of this, and sometimes even to take those 2 AM phone calls from the CIO asking “what the hell is going on?” You don’t want a FNG in that role if you can avoid it. If you do have to go with raw talent, get them some training so that they can succeed. OJT may be more valuable, but issues involving the firewall are always time-sensitive, and usually impact everything. They need a good starting point. Separation of duties-server admins should NOT be firewall admins. It’s a direct conflict of interest. The firewall is designed to restrict traffic to only that which is explicitly permitted. Server admins should be able to define those requirements. If they cannot, sometimes the time crunch of deploying a new system can lead to the ip any approach, with the intended but never realised “we’ll fix it later” promise. But no matter who manages it…for Pete’s* sake, make sure they all log in with unique credentials. No one should be logging in as admin or root. *Pete is my imaginary friend, who gets really upset when he sees audit logs with admin, root, administrator, etc.
smilies/cool.gif
To Brazzil Magazine
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
Deny all has never cost someone their job.But it has saved their arse. It’s a fact. Firewall’s default posture is to implicitly deny everything that is not explicitly permitted. Use that. Embrace that. Love that. Never, EVER, try to get around that. Sure, an ip any might seem like a good idea at the time…it might even facilitate quickly ruling the firewall out as the cause of some problem, but it is not the right way to go. Look at it another way…there are 65,536 TCP ports, 65,536 UDP ports, maybe a dozen or so ICMP types actually in use, and about 8 or 9 IP types commonly encountered. Do the math…it is far easier to block all and permit only what you really want, then to permit all and try to block the bad packets. Evil bit aside, you just can’t win if that is your approach.
Bypassing the firewall? How ’bout “NO.”Watch your design, especially with DMZ servers, VMs, and so-called backup networks. The idea of having a firewall is to provide a separation between the zones you don’t fully trust (the DMZ, the Internet) and the zone you do (the internal network.) Multihomed hosts, VM hosts with NICs on both the DMZ and internal networks, and backup networks in particular, can all provide a path into your internal network, bypassing the controls of the firewall completely. If you are going to have a backup network, and OOB management network, or the like, make sure that network is as ‘untrusted’ as the DMZ, and filter it from the internal network.
ICMP Echo is not the enemy.

So tell me, why is it that you block ICMP? No, I understand that we don’t want redirects, or subnet requests, or timestamp requests, or other bad things like that. That’s not what I asked. I asked….why is it that you block ICMP? Maybe I should make myself more clear…why is it that you block ICMP ECHO? Ping, while rudimentary at best, still proves very useful in troubleshooting basic network connectivity. It confirms name resolution and routing in one command….heck, how many of you ping a hostname to get the ip.addr instead of doing a host or an nslookup? Come on, show of hands…how many?See, here’s the thing. The regular users are getting wise to the ways of the net. Ping may not make much sense to them, but they know enough to open a cmd prompt and ping www.yourwebsite.com. I’m not saying to open the floodgates of ICMP, but allowing ECHO to your website is not the end of the world. You can rate limit it if you fear a ping flood, size limit it if you fear a DoS, and your IPS can shun a source that is doing a ping sweep. You will find utility greatly outweighs any reduction in security by doing the following

* allowing ICMP ECHO requests to your web server,
* allowing ICMP ECHO requests to your VPN concentrator, and
* allowing ICMP ECHO requests throughout your internal network.
* Of course, allow the corresponding ICMP ECHO REPLIES to all of the above. The Ping of Death is so old that if you are still running susceptible systems you deserve to have them bluescreen. Heck, you probably want them to so folks will finally upgrade! And while your security guys (the audit ones, not the ones who are technical) may fear folks using traceroute to map your network, remind them that Linux boxes use UDP, not ICMP, to trace, and the awesome Windows tool TCPING uses TCP and incrementing TTLs to do the same thing as an ICMP based trace does. So while you are defending the realm from n00bs and wannabes, you’re doing it wrong. smilies/cool.gif
Last but not least I hope this comment is helpful.......
written by a.norlina, April 22, 2011
NAT is EVIL!So much so that I used to have a blog tag dedicated just to that point. They’re all under older rants now if you’re curious. Hey, NAT’ing traffic going from the internal network out to the Internet is just fine. You should be doing that. NAT’ing traffic from the Internet into the DMZ is okay too. But never, ever, EVER NAT traffic from the internal network to the DMZ, or the DMZ to the internal network. Trust me on this one folks. Between the fun you will have with DNS entries, the protocols you will have to fix up because they include network addresses in the application layer, pinging an internal name to see a response from an external address (harmless itself, but you will be questioned about it ever week from now until the end of time,) and the protocols you will just plain damn break because they don’t NAT (IPSec, RPC DCOM, SIP, RTP, TLS, et al.) it is just not something you want to do. If you don’t want your internal users hitting your website over the Internet, just split your DNS! Personally, I would rather they do…you’ll find out about any issues a lot quicker if they are experienced internally, and you might even get the chance to fix them before an external customer notices. When to drop? On the Internet. Dropping packets into the bit bucket means that the firewall does not respond to them. To the sender, there is no perceptible difference between packets that are dropped by the firewall, and packets that are sent to a down, or non-existent host. On the Internet access-list, we want to drop silently all unsolicited packets that are not explicitly permitted. That way, we’re not giving away any more information about our network, our hosts, or our configuration than is absolutely necessary. We’re making the bad guys work for it. Of course, legitimate clients will not know that their packets are being dropped, and may continue to send packets until the application time-out is reached, but that will be the exception and not the norm. smilies/cool.gif
3rd time's the charm
written by Simpleton, April 22, 2011
THX a.norlina, I enjoyed reading all you had to say (and yes you used a few acronyms I don't ken) although Joao and others probably won't care to comment on it.

On an enterprise level I don't think little guys like Brazzil will have the lattitude for the staffing levels you've recommended. If you had done the homework you might have noticed they farmed out the database migration endeavor here a few years ago as well as tried to let the server clean up job resulting from the most recent tragedy.

There's a nice nuclear power plant up the road that could probably use your talents before they get Obama'd if you're looking for work.
Simpleton
written by João da Silva, April 24, 2011

THX a.norlina, I enjoyed reading all you had to say (and yes you used a few acronyms I don't ken) although Joao and others probably won't care to comment on it.


Wrong, Simpleton! I was very busy during the week end and my profound apologies for not contesting you earlier on this issue.

Angie Norlinha is 1000% correct (as our agent in Geneve) would say. smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

But...but...but..., I hope the Malaysian Government wouldn't punish her by "relocating" her to Mongolia as their "Charge de affairs", after her "outbursts".

But..but...but.. if she is sent to DF, I´d be happy to meet her in person. smilies/cheesy.gif
purple wedding invitations
written by purple wedding invitations, April 25, 2011
Although the crowned black wedding invitations have yet to formally accept, and the King of Thailand is said to be too ill to attend, a senior source within the Foreign Office described it as a high proportion of crowned heads for a wedding that is not being treated as a state wedding.
US President Barack Obama and hispink wedding invitations Michelle are understood not to have received a wedding invitation, although they have been invited to Buckingham Palace for a state visit in May in what is being seen as a ‘sweetener’.The invitations are on thick white card measuring 8in by 6in, bevelled, gilded and stamped with red wedding invitations
in gold which has then been burnished.
Obama Re-Election Campaign Anthem
written by CHC Fan Club, April 25, 2011
OBAMA ... YOUR MAMA

DID YOU FIND OSAMA?

WHAT HAVE YOU DONE FOR ME

LATE-LY?



Costinha
Simple Hack
written by CHC Fan Club, April 25, 2011
Employ 100K spook pcs to simply "ping" any url endlessly and concurrently, the system will come down, no doubt!

Costinha da Costa
CHC Fan Club
written by .., April 25, 2011

OBAMA ... YOUR MAMA

DID YOU FIND OSAMA?


But...but...but... it was GWB who was supposed to hunt down OSAMA ruthlessly after a relentless pursuit .smilies/shocked.gif

In protest, I am canceling my membership from your club.smilies/angry.gif
Lost Packet(sta-NY's)
written by Simpleton, April 26, 2011
100K spook pcs all synchronised in timing and smart enough to know not to wait for a ping response before sending the next ping - good one Costa!

So with the impediments of not allowing collateral damages anymore, are the Pakistani's going to take over the operation to relentlessly pursue and root out Osama's nightmare? Are those now supposedly reporting to BHO ruthessly hunting him in all the wrong places? (He's staying in NY ya know.)

Private exclusive-exclusive quantity limited CHC Fan Club memberships coming available? Oh Goody, where do I sign up?
Rachel Cunha....
written by CHC Fan Club, April 26, 2011
Senta na minha cara e solta aquele peito, Haaaaaa..........

Just an observation....this "a.norlina" talks a lot. I bet he has black-belt in mouth!

Hehehehe

Costinha
João… Joâozâo do meu Coração!
written by CHC Fan Club, April 26, 2011


Where have you been carrying your Bundão?

Costão da Costinha
North for the season perhaps?
written by Simpleton, April 26, 2011
Pretty sure I noted in Joao's exceptional willingness to meet with Angie in the DF a key clue as to where his bundao may have been carried off to for safe keeping.

While you are gestating on the next twist in your moniker and post signature Costa, why not move up seven places in the alphabet from C..C to K..K so you can use Kant read worth a Krud.
CHC Fan Club
written by João da Silva, April 26, 2011
Howdy Dr.Costão,


Where have you been carrying your Bundão?


May I ask you the same question, mah lad???smilies/wink.gifsmilies/cheesy.gifsmilies/grin.gif

BTW, is this "Fan Club" an ONG financed by ch.c at Minus 1.7% a year?

But..but...but... good to hear from you again?smilies/cheesy.gif

P.S: "A.Norlinha" is a "she".smilies/wink.gif
I’ve got your Ksssssssssssssss
written by CHC Fan Club, April 26, 2011


Dear Simpleton:

You should stop sunbathing in the morning…. It is photosynthesizing the fungus between your goat ears!

Costinha
Double Trouble
written by Simpleton, April 27, 2011
You're right Costa, I'll have to start spending the afternoons in the chalet weaving a new straw hat for the morning tanning ritual. Staying out of the sun entirely is not an option though, I need to keep up with the dark meat appearance of my double peckers so I can attract a second white chick to replace my mulata and pretinha.
to doida pra pegar uma carona
written by LILLY MARLEN, June 02, 2011
to doida pra pegar uma carona smilies/grin.gif
Aaaaaiiii
written by Simpleton, June 09, 2011
Lilly, voce me interessa .(*). & .(o). [duas]smilies/tongue.gifsmilies/tongue.gifsmilies/wink.gif

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack