Comments for Brazil's Election - Alckmin Hands Lula Victory on a Plate at http://www.brazzil.com , comment 1 to 9 out of 9 comments http://www.brazzil.com Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:38:12 +0100 FeedCreator 1.7.3 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-18066 ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D - pat Mon, 02 Oct 2006 02:00:24 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17835 [b]I guess you don\'t understand the difference between the two. Oh, well. [/b] The difference is that Collor was investigated by his peers, congress and supreme court and \"found\" inocent. Not Lula. He was not investigated by his peers, nor by congress, nor by anyone. He was everything but throughly investigated. I don\'t defend Collor. He was a bad president. He commited a great \"mistake\" by confiscating bank savings of the people (that should be considered a crime in a serious country). He tried to establish an impossible coalision government which eventually failed. And I strongly believe he was corrupt too (look at Casa da Dinda stuff), despite his claimed inocence by everyone else. But when we compare Lula to Collor, it\'s clear that the first is much more corrupt than the latter. - Truth Sun, 27 Aug 2006 01:41:07 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17829 I guess you don\'t understand the difference between the two. Oh, well. - cacique Sat, 26 Aug 2006 10:33:59 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17822 Nah, Collor was throughly investigated by brazilian Supreme Court and \"proved\" inocent. Lula was not even investigated by Supreme Court... - Truth Fri, 25 Aug 2006 22:02:25 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17820 As Brazil campaign kicks into gear, Lula cruises http://today.reuters.com/news/articlenews.aspx?type=worldNews&storyID=2006-08-25T201737Z_01_N24371103_RTRUKOC_0_US-BRAZIL-ELECTION-LULA.xml&archived=False - cacique Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:28:46 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17819 Quite the opposite about Collor, as you know. Lula was, in fact, thoroughly investigated and is clean. That\'s a fact. Sorry, crybaby. - cacique Fri, 25 Aug 2006 21:27:37 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17804 Bring back Collor. He was also throughly investigated and nothing was found about him :lol: - Truth Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:38:25 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17798 Lula is the only politician thoroughly investigated and found to be clean. Of course he\'ll win. And he should win. The economy is better than ever. If corruption in Brazilian politics seems bad, it\'s because it is. The only difference now is that it\'s being investigated and prosecuted more than ever. And it should be. The poor of Brazil cannot seriously have expected that in four years Brazil would become a model of democracy and equality. Lula has done much good for the people of Brazil, and he will continue to do so in his next term. Viva Lula. PS No one cares what John Fitzpatrick says about anything. - cacique Thu, 24 Aug 2006 10:51:50 +0100 http://www.brazzil.com/home-mainmenu-1/170-august-2006/9674.html#comment-17776 Well... In your text you asked why don\'t we consider Lula (the actual president of Brazil) the winner of these elections... In my opinion we don\'t do this because it\'s kind of our last chance to save the country we leave of another man which will steal everything that he can care on his pockets... We don\'t consider this election ended because it would be nothing more than a sign telling that we don\'t care about who \"comands\" this nation.... Well... Maybe I\'m wrong... But this is the opinion of a 16 years old boy... :-\\ Bye all... And sorry for my bad english... I still learning it.. ;) - Pedro Baldin Tue, 22 Aug 2006 15:24:21 +0100