Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home Info November 2004 Brazil, Finally Vaccinated Against Lula and the PT

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33088808

Who's Online

We have 552 guests online



Brazil, Finally Vaccinated Against Lula and the PT PDF Print E-mail
2004 - November 2004
Written by Janer Cristaldo   
Sunday, 14 November 2004 16:07

Favela (shantytown) in São PauloSão Paulo is a rich town, isn’t it true? There is a miniscule minority of poor people in São Paulo. At least that is the theory behind the assertions by the local press in these post-election days.

If I belonged to that race who mistakenly assumes the universe to be a six-squared-feet-circle-around-the-nose, as Ernesto Sábato would say, I would be in total agreement with such statement.

I reside in a Jewish neighborhood, upper-middle class, high level of consumer spending, good restaurants, and a mall next door to my house. There are a few mendigos (beggars, panhandlers, hobos) on the sidewalks, here and there - and allow me here to apologize for the use of the word mendigo.

According to advocates for Human Rights, it’s a word that ought to be erased from dictionaries. It’s humiliating. The new and correct terminology would be street people; or, better yet, the excluded.

Mendigo has become a curse word and sooner or later will lead to suits filed on the basis of racism. In any case, while dictionaries have not been revised, I don’t exempt myself from using it. And, on the day when fanatics for the politically correct have the power to amend dictionaries, it won’t even be worth writing it any more.

Right after the first round election, the daily Folha de S. Paulo printed, in clear words: “The survey confirms what the geographical vote division already indicated: Serra gets the vote of the more affluent and educated, and Marta doesn’t do so badly among lower income residents with fewer years of schooling.”

Look, in the first round of the election, Serra won by an eight percent margin of votes. Thus, we can infer that, in São Paulo, there are more rich people than there are poor.
 
Next to this brilliant deduction by reporter Pedro Dias Leite, the Folha, in its October 10 edition, featured a chart, entitled “Vote by Category”.

FAMILY INCOME
in minimum wage salary/month
 
   up to 5  from 5 to 10   more than 10
 
José Serra                 49                           52                                   61
Marta Suplicy          41                           39                                   33

Well, no one can pretend that up to five minimum wage salaries per month – or as many as ten – characterizes wealth. Serra won in these first two brackets, as well as the other, of more than ten minimum wage salaries, which neither translates into wealth, if we remain close to the ten.

The reporter, dauntless, in a column next to the charts, points out the opposite of what the charts confirm. Print journalism is rapidly approaching the TV genre, which displays images of an event, with voice-over narration conflicting with what pictures show, while the little lamb – sitting passively in front of the screen – swallows in the words from the newscaster, who negates what the viewer is witnessing.

In the runoff, the margin neared 11%. An obvious deduction by a certain type of journalist: in thirty days, the number of wealthy has risen in São Paulo. It’s the conclusion I would come to were I so short-sighted as to mistake my neighborhood for the entire town.

Despite being the richest metropolis in the Nation, it is eye-catching to any non-myopic individual, that São Paulo is a mostly poor city, with islands of wealth and even lots of luxury.

All it takes is a quick tour of downtown, post card to any city, to get a sense of the poverty that inundates and pollutes São Paulo.

One Sunday, after lunch in Liberdade (São Paulo’s Asian neighborhood), I walked my way back through downtown. I’d never seen anything so depressing and dirty in my whole life, and that having seen many of our little planet’s capitals, in Europe, Africa, and the socialist world.

During quick incursions around what we here call outskirts, the pervasive poverty is yet more appalling. Not to mention the 612 favelas (shantytowns) that do nothing to embellish the city, and whose residents make up 20% of the population.

José Serra beat Marta Suplicy by a margin of 600 thousand votes. And some journalists want us to believe that Serra was elected by the rich. That is, amidst this chaos of 15 million people, there are at least 600 thousand more wealthy people than there are poor. I was living in a city of affluent people and wasn’t aware.

Behind such fanatic reasoning lies the notion that it is the Workers Party alone who is the party of the underprivileged. And if the poor people’s party was defeated, then the rich voted overwhelmingly for the opponent.

Therefore, the majority of the city’s residents are wealthy. On a logical point of view, the syllogism is impeccable. The premises, on the other hand, are immoral.

Right after the loss in the first round, Madame Marta, in her peculiar arrogant fashion, stated: “I will not lose these elections.” That Fidel Castro, Muammar Kadafi, or Kim Il Sung possess such a conviction, it’s not surprising.

But it’s not permissible for a candidate, in democratic elections, to value his/her will worthier than the will of the people. With the unrelenting dance of numbers, lady Alcaide (wife of the commander/governor of a fortress in Spain or Portugal) narrowed her eyes and made a toast to the press with a few crocodile tears.

That some of her adversaries exploited prejudices against her candidacy. She was merely a defenseless woman. Not recalling – that is, recalling but making a point of not doing so – that, as a woman, she had been House Representative, Mayor, and again a mayoral candidate, in this city, where a woman – and even a black man – had previously been elected.

Both with disastrous results to the city, as a matter of fact, but that has nothing to do with gender or race; just look at the administration of the very blonde Marta Teresa Smith de Vasconcellos Suplicy.

Desperate, she appealed to the last recourse to her avail: she began blaming voters who would choose to deny her the vote. They’re unjust, ingrates. Only those who vote on Marta Teresa are just.

She came close to claiming that to the just belong the CEUs (HEAVENs in Portuguese; for those not from São Paulo, it also stands for Unified Education Centers, that Marta Teresa insists on pronouncing céus - to make it sound like “heavens”; actually, these are community centers established in the favelas and outskirts, with swimming pools and sports facilities.

Lady Alcaide then sticks in three schools in these leisure centers, which allows her to divert education funds to capture votes from the people of the favelas). Not voting on Marta would be - according to her own assessment - a flagrant demonstration of bad character.

Of course, she lost. She lost, despite the obscene support from the President; she lost, despite using municipal administrative resources; she lost, despite the four thousand visitors – canvasses hired on a 700 plus reais a month, to visit 25 homes a day – in order to co-opt voters.

But justice be done: the sound defeat ought not to be attributed to this lady alone. In less than two years, the Workers Party ruled federal government, adamant advocates for ethics, has morphed into a sanctuary of corrupt friends.

Certain evils are a necessity, as His Sanctity Pope John Paul II would say – and recently said – in regards to communism. The Workers Party was one.

Former Minister Delfim Netto said more than a decade ago that Lula should have won in his first presidential run. That way, we would already have been vaccinated against the Workers Party and could go on and take care of the serious issues.

The Nation is tired of the Workers Party. The vaccine has kicked in.

Janer Cristaldo—he holds a PhD from University of Paris, Sorbonne—is an author, translator, lawyer, philosopher and journalist and lives in São Paulo. His e-mail address is cristal@baguete.com.br.

Translated from the Portuguese by Eduardo Assumpção de Queiroz. He is a freelance translator, with a degree in Business and almost 20 years of experience working in the fields of economics, communications, social and political sciences, and sports. He lives in Boca Raton, FL. His email: eaqus@adelphia.net.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (2)Add Comment
This is the most allienated thing i have
written by Guest, December 14, 2004
This "text" is completely imparcial, just as this magazine, you claimed the workers party was defeated, but you denied to speak that it controls more cities now than in the last ellection, you also fail to point out that Marta Suplicy become Mayor of Sao Paulo after a Huge crisis due to corruption by the ex-mayor Celso Pitta(please note the fact that Serra´s vice mayor used to be Pitta´s Finances Secretary and that he is involved in over 5 judicial issues).
Marta Suplicy has increased the public schools and did a great job in the recover of the infra-structure of the city and the fact that she lost the ellection is not due to Serra being better than her, but because she lacked the support of part of the Workers party, including the support of her ex-husband, The Senator Luiz Suplicy, wich was the most voted Senator of the State of Sao Paulo.
Ex- Politician in Chicago, Illinois US
written by Guest, December 27, 2004
There is a much larger lesson urban planners can learn from the scenario presented in Janer Cristaldo collumn. In the 1970's and 1980's Chicago was much like, but not as bad as Sao Paulo. Wide patches of segregation is nothing more than an infection that can be hidden but will not go away. It can be treated as an untreated illness. It will only grow worse, build up and eventually damage the whole. This may not affect you, but it will certainly effect the offspring you leave in it's wake. In Chicago, St. Louis and other large U.S. cities during the 1960's, Large high rise apartment buildings were constructed (in good faith) to supply housing for the poor. On the surface it appeared a good deed. Under the surface, they were designed to keep the poor with the poor. Who wants to live next door to "them" right? They can be over there and WE can be over here. It only took 10 years to find out what a grave mistake that was. The buildings became massaive complexes of crime, drugs and dispair. How was the rich affected? Chicago's international image was one of the highlighted crime that happened from within. Then the wealthy found out that these pockets of the poor were living in areas of the city that were prime locations. Local planners soon found out that is is far better for the lives of everyone to desegrate and assimulate the poor within the entire community. The 10 miles of high rise apartment buildings are nearly completely torn down now. The areas of the city where the rich live with the poor is not perfect, but the rich are no longer scared to travel in areas where only the poor use to live. (near the beaches, parks and lake shore) I'm not writing this to encourage the politicians in your city to allow the poor the live near the rich because I know that will not happen in my lifetime. What I am saying that when the politicians DO decide that they need to start providing better housing and living conditions for the poor that they spread the solution throughout the community. If you have 100 poor families spreaded throughout a neighborhood of wealthy in subsidized housing many things happen. 1) They start copying the habits of their environment. 2) Those in the environment offer assitance to lift them up instead of pushing them down. 3) The fear of the wealthy turns into an understanding of those who have not. 4) The city will not elimate poverty, merely control it. 5) Those who lift themselves out of poverty will become some of the stronger products of their environments. I know, I'm one of those products.
Marvin McNeil, a Black man from Chicago

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack