Brazzil

Since 1989 Trying to Understand Brazil

Home Info February 2005 After Defeat, Can Lula Do Any Reform in Brazil?

----------

Brazilian Eyelash Enhancer & Conditioner Makeup

----------

Get Me Earrings

----------

Buy Me Handbags

----------

Find Me Diamond

----------

Wholesale Clothing On Sammydress.com

----------

Brautkleider 2013

----------

Online shopping at Tmart.com and Free Shipping

----------

Wholesale Brazilian Hair Extensions on DHgate.com

----------

Global Online shopping with free shipping at Handgiftbox

----------

Search

Custom Search
Members : 22767
Content : 3832
Content View Hits : 33084396

Who's Online

We have 623 guests online



After Defeat, Can Lula Do Any Reform in Brazil? PDF Print E-mail
2005 - February 2005
Written by Norman Madarasz   
Friday, 18 February 2005 11:34

Ultra conservative PP representative Severino Cavalcanti from BrazilValentine’s Day is not celebrated in Brazil. Lover’s Day is. Regardless, Brazil’s governing PT had not expected the day to end with a kiss from Al Capone. On February 14-15, Lula’s government suffered the single most devastating blow to its legislative power since taking office on January 1, 2003.

After weeks of campaigning for the election of Luiz Eduardo Greenhalgh (PT representative for São Paulo) to the Leadership of the lower house of Congress, the PT suddenly found itself dealing with embarrassing competition from a self-nominated party member, Virgílio Guimarães (PT representative for Minas Gerais state).

Never suspecting Greenhalgh had a chance of being edged by Guimarães, by the early morning hours of February 15 the PT ended up losing out on both candidates in a shifted alliance of parties.

As a result, the low-profile ultra-conservative member of the lower house, Severino Cavalcanti (Partido Progressista (PP) for Pernambuco state), was elected by a landslide victory of 300 to 195 votes.

The “long knife” nature of these congressional elections was reinforced by Cavalcanti’s victory speech. He immediately confirmed his intension to raise the salary of house representatives and senators, as well as federal judges, and maintain the three-month vacation plan for house representatives, which was set for major axing.

He also plans to impede the Executive from running through a tax hike on service-providing companies (Provisional Measure 232). His agenda also features an unpopular draft on extending the presidential mandate to six years—but barring the possibility of re-election.

What this means for Lula’s government is that the roughshod alliance it managed to built in the Congress has evaporated. Cavalcanti, also known as the king of the backbenchers, has a long history of repressive policies.

A fundamentalist Catholic, in 1980 he snitched on an Italian priest, Father Vito Miracapillo, leading to the priest’s expulsion from Brazil by the then military government. Father Miracapillo had refused to celebrate a “mass for the people” on Independence Day since, in his view, Brazilians could not be independent while under dictatorial rule.

(Belonging to the Church’s progressive wing, the priest saw the expulsion order lifted in 1993, but cannot live in Brazil as he is still awaiting amnesty.) Although a nationalist, or rather a populist, Cavalcanti can easily become one of Bush’s bedfellows in South America.

The results of the Congressional elections, either at the lower or upper house levels, are an unexpected turnabout for Lula’s cabinet. Historically, the party holding the highest number of seats in the Assembly heads the directing “board”, which organizes the voting agenda especially regarding the Executive’s decision to pass “Provisional Measures”.

Due to the nature of Brazil’s post-dictatorial 1988 Federal Democratic Constitution, the political landscape is spread widely across several parties, rendering it next to impossible for a single party to govern as a majority. Provisional Measures, roughly equivalent to American Presidential decrees although they require Congressional approval, facilitate governance under these circumstances.

Despite the high profile exiting and debarring of the most vocal radical members of the PT, a strain of participatory democracy still runs through the party. The nomination procedure for the house leader is one of its unfortunate effects.

Greenhalgh was the nominee to have received the most nominations from house representatives in the three choices they were each given. The problem was that he was edged in first-place finishes by Guimarães. This information was revealed only after the party’s defeat so as to justify what had seemed to be Guimarães’ stubborn adamancy to remain in the race.

By the end of the first round on February 14, Greenhalgh was largely ahead of Cavalcanti, who held a small lead over Guimarães and thus eliminate him from the run-off. But then, Guimarães supporters, who reportedly gathered more of the left-wing of the party and allies, voted in opposition to Greenhalgh.

Whatever their motivation, distraught representatives have ushered one of Brazil’s oldest ultra-conservative politicians to the seat of the third most powerful post in Brazil’s governing hierarchy, right after the president and vice-president.

For the Brazilian population who gave Lula a landslide victory in 2002, the Congressional elections amount to nothing less than intra-political negligence. For Lula, it was clearly a stab in the back. The landscape of federal politics in Brazil has reverted back to old times.

Basically, without any inkling of a majority in the Congress, Lula’s executive risks being legislatively paralyzed. Worse, he is going to have to take the blame for Congress’s attempt to rule as an independent body.

For the time being, though, the still popular President has proved to be optimistic. He told BBC news on Wednesday February 16, “I’ve already spoken to Severino today. He has always voted with the government, and has always been part of the alliance base. I have no doubt that our bills will be enacted as they have been [until now].”

Some ten years older than Lula, Cavalcanti is also a Pernambuco state high school drop out, but the comparison between the two men stops there. By Thursday evening, the scenario did not look as clear with House Leader Cavalcanti exposing his own agenda and conditions to the President in a personal meeting.

Faced with the prospect of legislative resistance, this time around, Lula might be able to contest the booing he gets from the opposition within his own party. Not that the rowdy reception given to the President at the World Social Forum in Porto Alegre was undeserved.

On a practical and administrative level, not much in his government’s policies has amounted to a major shift away from the principles of neo-liberal governance, notwithstanding its concerns for sustainable development.

On the economic front, it is true that Lula’s government has been able to overcome the devaluation suffered by the national currency, the real. It managed to jumpstart a logistically ill-prepared export sector and boost it into a world leader.

Despite outstanding port facilities in Santos, Vitória and Rio, and the private ports run by companies such as Vale do Rio Doce, Brazil’s industrial infrastructure is painfully underdeveloped given the country’s heavy reliance on exporting natural resources and agricultural products.

Lula’s government freed up desperately needed credit lines for companies to take advantage of the weak currency abroad. Their contribution went on to set record after record in yearly export surpluses.

Meanwhile, Brazil’s economic performance has allowed the government to negotiate conditions with the IMF on servicing its public loan. Still, Lula’s Finance Minister, Antonio Palocci, has convinced himself and the government of the need to hold firm on neo-liberal “developmental” policies as dictated by the World Bank.

According to him, it is necessary in order to get out of the volatile situation Wall Street and the City placed the country in owing to the apparent shift of its voting population toward the “left-leaning” candidate, Lula da Silva in 2002.

Ken Maxwell reminded the Anglo-American financial sector in the Financial Times in 2002 that while magic realism had faded as a literary movement in South America, Wall Street was manifestly intent on keeping it alive. It was portraying Lula as a leader hell-bent on defaulting on the debt and waging a revolution.

Various House representatives in the US still do tend to paint in similar numbers. Upon closer inspection, anyone can call their bluff as their main beef with Brazil has to do with nothing more than the country’s great competitive export power.

In a bid to convince Brazil’s middle classes of his moderation, candidate Lula even decided to hire spin-doctor cynic (and coq fighter) Duda Mendonça to refurbish his image. By doing so, he had forgone a revolutionary experiment that would have plunged Brazil into international isolation before it could pull itself out from the hole.

By the end of 2002, though, the IMF’s dictates to neighboring Argentina proved misguided as they led to the collapse of the country’s economy and a palace coup. The following year, Joe Stieglitz nailed the IMF on incompetence for the economic recovery policies it was imposing on countries suffering from collapsing currency markets.

Examples of Russia, South Korea and Malaysia all refused IMF assistance in the face of economic breakdown and defaulted on their public loan servicing. And they all managed to post outstanding growth only a few years later and managed to maintain those levels with real GDP growth rates of 7.1%, 6 %, 7%, respectively, in 2004 alone.

On the other hand, under IMF escort, Brazil finally managed some 4.3% growth in 2004, but after three years of utter stagnancy, which saw it slip in GDP rank from 8th to 15th in the world. 

As the Argentine crisis headed for collapse in late summer of 2002, the Financial Times held a knife to Lula’s throat about naming his finance minister and central bank president before the elections took place. As it turned out, it was all a skillful power play contributing to the rampage that tore international hot-money and short-term investments out of the country.

In the turmoil, Lula could not get out of appointing Henrique Meirelles as Central Bank President. As a former executive director of Fleet-Boston, Meirelles stands directly over the conglomerate’s 30 million dollar investment in Brazil. This figure resounded with the loan proposed to stranglehold Lula in late summer 2002 when the real fell prey to “international” speculation.

Judging by the hushed up scandal of Meirelles’ alleged income tax inconsistencies, he is the IMF’s guarantee to keep the prime lending rate up (now at 16.5%) and spending on infrastructure down. Nonetheless, with its outstanding economic results the government forced through a law on raising minimum wage to R$ 300 (roughly, US$ 90 per month) against IMF dictates, after it had been slapped on the hand by the working poor for penny pinching a month earlier on the same issue.

Lula’s victory as president in 2002 was a historical landslide. Yet his gains in Congress are built upon an alliance with parties often completely at odds with the PT’s program of deep social and constitutional reform. Lula’s attempt at overhauling a completely elitist “public” sector within his first year of government, and axing the pension plans and sundry handouts offered to the country’s wealthiest, had to be watered down in order to avoid a Machiavellian turnaround.

The threat to cut absurdly overpaid pension plans to federal judges was cynically used by the latter to mobilize lower-paid civil servants who were being asked, in a gesture of fairness, to bear proportional cuts. With raises on salaries for public servants stalled during the post-1998 real devaluation period, and despite mounting inflation to near double-digit levels, neither the bottom scale nor the top—despite the extreme disproportion—would accept cuts to pensions. To avoid a social crisis Lula’s team had to pull back.

Like any capital, Brasilia lives on a cloud of privilege.  Not all countries in the world, however, are as proto-revolutionary as Brazil is. Without giving some slack, the politicians of the two houses of Congress, senior civil servants and the judiciary, despite how buffered they might feel on the plateaus of Goiás, are playing with fire.

Less than a 100 km away, hundreds of “sem tetos”, homeless squatters, have been battling a brutal military police attack ordered by the state government. In Pará, as Lula attempted to crush illegal deforestation of the Amazon forest and the use of slave labor, an American missionary nun was assassinated.

Now the lower house of the Congress is ruled by a man who stands against constitutional reform, against homosexual common-law union and marriage, and social reform in general. A catholic fundamentalist, Cavalcanti is the oligarch’s new man in power—two steps back for Lula’s half step forward.

Lula’s executive is now near paralysis. It may have to adopt yet another tactic from former president Fernando Henrique Cardoso, whose own government was often paralyzed by the PT opposition and similarly had to accept power sharing with the oligarchs.

But Cardoso discreetly went after his political opponents by pinning long-term corruption charges against them. With white-collar crime blooming in Brazil as much as in the G7 zone, such tactics might lay out of reach. The problem is criminal powers also learn not to repeat mistakes.

Norman Madarasz is Visiting Associate Professor of Philosophy at Universidade Gama Filho, Rio de Janeiro. He welcomes comments at nmphdiol2@yahoo.ca.



Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Comments (17)Add Comment
Great!
written by Guest, February 18, 2005
I hope GW Bush invites Cavalcanti to the White House and does all he can to elevate Cavalcanti's stature.
Cavalcanti e um reves para progresso no
written by Guest, February 19, 2005
Espero que o Brasil recupere deste reves!
It wasn\'t PTs fault
written by Guest, February 19, 2005
It wasn't PT that voted for Calvacanti. PSDB and PFL voted in bloc for him. That should show you the wonderful opposition we have in our country. They are willing to give maybe the worst possible candidate incredible power so as to hurt the government. Real patriotic of them, shows you the sense of duty they have.

Oh well two years from now we'll have a re-elected Lula, a larger majority in congress and a speaker from PT.
Re: It wasn\'t PTs fault
written by Guest, February 19, 2005
Lula said democracy is a farce anyway. Brazil's days of representative government are number. I predict Lula will be "President" for life.
lol
written by Guest, February 19, 2005
and thus you show your ignorance
Won\'t wash
written by Guest, February 19, 2005
Calvacanti's election in Congress only garuentees one thing...more gridlock. Why do you think the PSDB and PFL voted in bloc against the PT and Lula? Why did they take back Sao Paulo from a now obviously unqualified, and possibly corrupt PT mayor. It's simple, the PT's tired polices are worn and old, the only reason the economy grew a pathetic 4% is that Lula, as the article states adopted "captialistic polices" that were forced upon him. The PT's lack of success, and inability to lead is now their downfall. The above poster who perdicts Lula's re-election has not been paying attention, it's over...and based on the Presdient's actions and reactions, he seems to know it. We are in for 2 years of more polictical infighting, and gridlock, where nothing will get accomplished, and things will worsen. Just what we needed huh...an elitist Congressional leader who has always protected the intrests of the federal and municipal bloodsuckers, and a President that can not make up his mind if he want's to emulate Bush or Chavez. Has anyone considered, that 2 out of the 3 most powerful people in our counrty are high school drop outs...thank good for good cerveza.
Re:Election
written by Guest, February 19, 2005
Be real guys, this is about politicos saving their own asses,, from what i took from the article , Lula intended on ending some of the priviledges of the congress. Thats why they voted for this guy, I'll bet even a number of PT also voted for this guy and why not? They're getting overpaid for being underworked and with 3 mos vacation also.
Good article, except for the neo fascist anti american remarks , I seriously doubt that Bush has a clue as to who this guy is.And as to Brazzils growing economic power whats the point if complete and utter corruption derail any of the benefits that the people might recive from this growth. And that the people are too beaten down, uninformed, or just to lazy to attempt tp change it.
Re: doubt that Bush has a clue as to who
written by Guest, February 19, 2005
I will make sure to write letters to him, Georgia's two Senators and my congressman about this. Cavalcante need to be Bush's "go to" guy when dealing with Brazil.
one solution
written by Guest, February 20, 2005
mistakes can be erased
written by Guest, February 20, 2005
i think brazil would benefit if someone would snuff this cavalcante out just as much as the u.s. would benefit if someone would snuff this bush out
I hope they log IPs here
written by Guest, February 20, 2005
You need to be reported to the Secret Service and Brazil's equivalent. The above poster shows us exactly why the Patriot Act is a good idea!
indecisive fool lula
written by Guest, February 21, 2005
this is what happens to gringo licking and IMF and world bank sucking whimps like lula.

he should have started massive land reform and massive income redistribution. instead, he does not know whether to emulate chavez or suck up to the blanco oligarchy of brazil.

i guess lula will go down in history, as the most spineless president, who could not take a stand against the privilege elite and the gringo back IMF and the world bank in brazil.

i feel sorry and sad for all the poor and destitute people in brazil, who voted with so much hope!!!! unfortunately, all they got was a right wing oligarchy sucking president and not a decisive leader like chavez!!!
Why not go all the way?
written by Guest, February 22, 2005
Maybe you could line up and execute all employers in Brazil. If you're going to be a hard core Communist, tell the truth about what you stand for! Remember that Stalin killed more Jews than Hitler!
in response to reporting me to the secre
written by Guest, February 25, 2005
i really don't care if ip addresses are recorded here or not. i'm not advocating a course of action to anyone, merely stating the opinion that these two men will do their utmost to prevent mans humanity to man from ever occuring. bush so far has snuffed out thousands of lives on the basis of a few lies. i wouldn't be sorry to see the man get his just rewards. that goes for all terrorists.
Loonies
written by Guest, March 14, 2005
Never a lack of nuts here…the "your a commie" and "USA-USA-USA" crowd on one side and the armchair revoluionary on the other side. You're both ignoramuses by my accounting.
Great! LOL
written by Guest, March 14, 2005
Bush raise status! That's rich…Great joke!
BILLSTEIN
written by Guest, May 16, 2005
NO WAY! LULA IS TIED TO THE SYSTEM. HE IS NOW A PLAYER OF THE GAME HE WAS ALWAYS CRITICAL OF! LET HIM ENJOY HIS DRINKS AND OTHER GOOD STUFF HE NOW HAS ACCESS TO! LEAVE THE GUY ALONE TO BECOME OUR NEXT DICTATOR. AT LEAST IT WILL BE A DICTATORSHIP OF THE PROLETARIAT!

Write comment

security code
Write the displayed characters


busy
 
Joomla 1.5 Templates by Joomlashack