Rio Group: Snubbing Washington and Pampering Havana

Rio Group It comes as no surprise that after decades of playing the role of hemispheric hegemon, the United States at the same time has created a critical mass that has inadvertently resulted in a backlash throughout Latin America. Founded in 1986, the Rio Group was created in response to the prevailing U.S. dominance in the region that helped spawn during this period a number of organizations with an autonomy-minded agenda.

After its inception, the Rio Group came to consist of 23 Latin American and Caribbean states, and had two primary concerns. The first, exemplified by U.S. exclusion from the organization, was to ensure that Latin Americans nations had control over their own international affairs. Hemispheric groups, most notably the Organization of American States (OAS), were heavily dominated by the United States' interests throughout the 20th century.

A secondary reason behind the creation of the Rio Group was to help mediate the American backed Contra wars of the 1980s and guerilla violence in Central America. The Rio Group was originally formed as the Contadora Group. The group had some measured success in demilitarizing guerilla groups in El Salvador, Nicaragua, and Guatemala.

While the Contadora member nations did not promote an anti-U.S. point of view, it became clear shortly after its inception, that the group would not be a tool of the United States. The member nations denounced Washington's use of unilateral force to protect its interests. In another blow to U.S. dominance of the region, the group recognized the democratically-elected Sandinista government in Nicaragua.

By looking out for their own interests within the region, Contadora Group nations inevitably ended up working counter to U.S. paramountcy that had been so dominant for nearly a century. Thanks to the independent manner of its member nations, the Contadora Group acted as a de facto precursor to the Rio Group, which went on to become an autonomous force in the hemisphere.

In November 2008, Cuba joined the Rio Group in what many declared as a monumental step towards regional integration. The move signaled the continued decline of the United States' standing in Latin America, as illustrated by the steady rise of left-leaning governments, trade and aid organizations, such as the Bolivarian Alternative for the Americas (ALBA), and major diplomatic spats with Venezuela, Ecuador, Argentina and Bolivia.

Additionally, Cuba's eventual membership in the Rio Group represented a stunning triumph for Havana's political legitimacy – Havana had become a bonafide and authenticated regional player after six decades of isolation. While Cuba's new role is of unquestionable benefit to the island, it could pose an element of risk in that it may breed complacency in the regime and discourage the Castro government from making the necessary political and social concessions that would promote democratic values and reform some of the more Stalinist aspects of the economy.

Shared Strategies

Members of the Rio Group seek to form political consensus on a number of issues, beginning with harmonizing foreign policy goals and cultivating proceedings to bring about hemispheric security. The Rio Group has been successful in achieving these goals through various means.

In 1991, the five Andean states of Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador, Peru, and Venezuela signed the Cartagena Declaration on Renunciation of Weapons of Mass Destruction, which created a nuclear weapon-free zone in the northern part of the continent.1 Another important initiative implemented through the Rio Group was the Treaty of Tlatelolco, which expanded upon the Cartagena Declaration by prohibiting nuclear weapons throughout all of Latin America and the Caribbean.

While Cuba was not a member of the group when the treaty was signed, it ratified the treaty to show its solidarity with the region. In addition to the aforementioned weapon bans, the Rio Group has also advocated for greater regional representation in the United Nations, arguing for "greater efficiency, transparency, and democracy in the Security Council." 2

While the Rio Group has yet to specify how this will be accomplished, there is little doubt that the nations of Latin America believe it is time that their region play a larger role in global organizations, including but not limited to, the United Nations.

Evolving Mindset

Cuba's entry into the Rio Group is significant in that it demonstrates Latin American nations are beginning to insist upon alternatives both when it comes to the application of neoliberal processes and U.S. dominance when it comes to governing the implementation of practical applications. Cuba would not have been able to join the Rio Group without support from other left-leaning nations such as Venezuela, Bolivia, and Ecuador.

Nor would the island have been able to be inducted had the United States been a participating member. Furthermore, Cuba's entry shows that Latin American nations are taking a less judgmental stance when it comes to dealing with governments that do not necessarily align with their own. At the same time, right-wing countries with ties to the United States, such as Colombia, El Salvador and Peru are becoming fewer in numbers.

Taking hemispheric realities into account is an important move and represents a clean break from many of the past policies of this country, which repeatedly had undermined, both covertly and overtly, governments who did not align themselves ideologically with its view and voice when it came to the disposition of its power and more concerned with their own national interests and world view. Meanwhile, it has become increasingly clear that Latin American nations are beginning to formulate their policies with less concern for what the U.S. reaction may be.

The positive aspects of Cuba's inclusion in the Rio Group are not limited to ramifications generated by ferment in international policy making. Rather, by entering and adding its approach to the mix, Cuba is becoming a part of an evolving region markedly different from its past. This is most often seen through newly developing trade blocs, and, although the Rio Group is not currently a notable economic force, the rash of connections that Cuban officials have entered into during casual as well as formal meetings is bound to increase Cuba's trade.

Moreover, since Latin America increasingly demonstrates that it will no longer automatically follow Washington's every turn, the United States may be forced to make unprecedented political and economic concessions to its neighbors in the future. This change in attitude would be extremely beneficial to many nations who have failed in the past to affect the direction of U.S.-Latin American relations over the past two centuries.

The U.S. may be pressured into easing relations with Cuba due to the shear volume of nations increasing their diplomatic ties with the island nation. Since 2008, numerous heads of state have visited Cuba. These have included Cristina Fernandez of Argentina, Michelle Bachelet of Chile, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela, Lula of Brazil, Dmitry Medvedev of Russia, and Hu Jintao of China. No longer can Washington's politicians say that the rest of the hemisphere, nor the world, supports their policies towards Cuba.

Rather, Cuba has slowly been integrated into various regional institutions, including the Inter-American Treaty of Reciprocal Assistance in 1982, the Latin American Integration System in 1998, ALBA in 2004, and a free trade agreement with the Caribbean Community (CARICOM) in 2008. These are in addition to the recently formed UNASUR, the South American Defense Council, and the Ibero-American Summit.

Raising Eyebrows

Critics of recent developments would argue that while accepting Cuba into the Rio Group may be beneficial for the island, these member nations essentially are condoning authoritarian tendencies of the Castro regime. Despite technically being elected by the National Assembly of People's Power in February 2008, Raul Castro was the only candidate listed on the ballot.

Lack of political opposition is a clear sign that would-be dissidents have grounds to be concerned over of the repercussions from running against the incumbent party. In fact, Cuba ultimately offers such limited political freedom that one would be hard-pressed to find anyone running for office who is not a member in good standing of the Communist Party.

While a 1992 constitutional reform allowed other parties to exist, they are still not permitted to campaign or be publicly active. Furthermore, several of the alternative parties subscribe to some variant of the left-leaning ideology tolerated in Cuba and do not represent a major threat to the all-embracing Partido Comunista de Cuba.

Those who do oppose the government are at a high risk of being apprehended and questioned for their dissident viewpoints. A recent Human Rights Watch report concluded that there are more than 200 political prisoners in Cuba.3 Other estimates are closer to 85.

Cuba's constitution is in conflict with a number of the liberties spelled out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which the island-nation signed in 1948. Of course, this charter was signed prior to the Cuban Revolution, during the presidency of Ramรณn Grau, so some may argue that Cuba is not tied to the declaration today.

The 1976 Cuban Constitution declares that, "Citizens have freedom of speech and of the press in keeping with the objectives of a socialist society." Thus, private citizens and especially journalists face the risk of state-sponsored repression if they portray the government in a negative light. In fact, the state controls the media and uses it to portray the ruling party in unqualified positive terms.

This control, in essence, acts contrary to the entire concept of freedom of the press. In terms of freedom of association, Amnesty International states that "All human rights, civil and professional associations and unions that exist today in Cuba outside the officialdom of the state apparatus and mass organizations controlled by the government are barred from having legal status."4

The Rio Group's admission of Cuba, despite some demonstrable human rights abuses, has raised some eyebrows when it comes to the legitimacy of reasoning such an approach. The response to this line of reasoning seems to be that it is hoped that Cuba will be tutored from within and that association with democratic ideas can be good for the nation in opening it and transforming its ethos, but that Cuba also has much to teach as well as learn when it comes to seeking viable economic and political options.


While Cuba's entrance into the Rio Group has the capacity to influence both international and domestic affairs on the island, the likelihood remains that substantial change will be somewhat limited due to the reclusive and viscous nature of the Castro government. More so than most nations, Cuba's internal issues are relatively slowed by external events.

The Castro regime has made relatively few changes in the past sixty years, and only with the recent transfer of power have any modest rights been institutionalized. Furthermore, the Rio Group has been active in sectors that generally do not directly impact the domestic well-being of nations.

While the organization has made tremendous strides in slowing the proliferation of weapons in the hemisphere, these programs will not change the average citizen's life like other more targeted economic or social programs in Latin America have. These have included the export of Cuban doctors to nations such as Haiti and Venezuela to provide medical assistance.

Nonetheless, after being expelled from the OAS in 1962 for being politically "incompatible" with the other member nations in a scenario scripted by U.S. intelligence services, Cuba is being welcomed back into Latin America with open arms; President Hugo Chavez of Venezuela believes Cuba, "is essentially the heart and the dignity of the peoples of Latin America and the Caribbean…Cuba always should have been returned to its place. Now we are complete."

The implications of Cuba's new relationship with the Rio Group remain to be seen, but it appears that Latin America has begun to slowly and steadily challenge Washington's leadership role in the hemisphere.

While the region may not be high up on President Obama's priority list, the president would be wise to recognize these changes and adjust U.S. policy accordingly, allowing for a more cooperative atmosphere instead of one in which the United States acts as a hemispheric policeman turned by issues which have prevented him from doing an honest job.

Hopefully Washington's policymakers will heed the words of Cuban Foreign Minister Celso Amorin, who recently declared, "U.S. foreign policy towards Latin America goes through Cuba."

1.Goldblat, Jozef. Arms control the new guide to negotiations and agreements. London: Sage Publications, 2002. 149.

2. Inventory of Nonproliferation Organizations and Regimes. Rep. 23 Jan. 2009. Center for Nonproliferation Studies. 25 Feb. 2009 .

3. 2008 World Report: Cuba. Rep. Human Rights Watch.

4. Cuba: Fundamental freedoms still under attack. Rep. 17 Mar. 2006. Amnesty International. .

This analysis was prepared by COHA Research Associate Adam Kott. The Council on Hemispheric Affairs (COHA) – – is a think tank established in 1975 to discuss and promote inter-American relationship. Email:


  • Show Comments (5)

  • Shelly1

    [quote]Fact is Latin America leaders are pampering…A DICTATOR…NEVER ELECTED ! [/quote]

    I have never met an elected dictator ๐Ÿ˜‰

    [quote]Facts are that even today most South America countries are nothing but already DICTATORSHIPS.,….DISGUISED IN DEMOCRACIES.

    When do you think South America had a democracy? It never has and it seems, it never will.

    Brazil is not a democracy–can I decide not to vote? What happens when I do not vote for presidential elections?

    I pay a fine, I won’t be able to renew my passport or even leave the country until my dues are payed with the circus country called Brazil!

    Democracia no Brazil e na America Latina is like me saying that Russia is a now a new democracy.

    Chavez, Morales, Correa are the new leaders of SA. Lula is a capacho and Chavez-poodle.

    A true democracy does not exist not in Brazil, not in Europe, and not in America. In a democratic government, a person votes-directly- to elect a representative.

    Most countries have a version of an electoral college. It is the case of a minority deciding for the majority.

    In the U.S, the 1% wealthy decides for the 99% not so wealthy.

    Do we live in a democratic government?

    Do we have freedom?

    What is freedom anyway? Does it come with a price?

    Freedom is a state of mind.

    “Freedom is what you do with what’s been done to you.” -Sartre

  • ch.c.

    Hmmmmmm !
    ASP is somewhat right !

    Fact is Latin America leaders are pampering…A DICTATOR…NEVER ELECTED !

    Worse than that, Cuba and Venezuela are tying again with Russia. So do other South Americans nations.
    These 2 countries are already offering newer military bases to Russia.
    Brazil too is tying more and more with Russia.

    This doesnt augur well for the future of South America. You will be sandwiched once more !
    That would be good for some of your populists leaders, socialists or capitalists.
    After all they just wait the right time to become DICTATORS AGAIN !
    Facts are that even today most South America countries are nothing but already DICTATORSHIPS.,….DISGUISED IN DEMOCRACIES.

    Who can believe half a second that the USA will not answer directly or not, publicly or not, one way or another ?
    Russia will help the leftists minded dictators, and the USA will help the capitalists minded dictators.

    Dont forget that the USA is also a DICTATORSHIP…..disguised in a Democracy. Dont they want to impose to the world over…whatever they think is good and what is bad ? And sadly it is not any better with Russia.

  • Joรƒฦ’ร‚ยฃo da Silva

    It would be interesting to hear the comments of our esteemed fellow blogger Mr.Jack Daniels on this particular issue.

  • ch.c.

    Snubbing Washington ????????
    And in the first line to get a meeting with Ohhlala ?

    COHA is definitely part of the Brazilian Disinformation & Propaganda dept, in the Planalto Palacio, right next to Robbing Hook office.
    Also somewhat funny that leftits and populists Presidents live in……Palacios !

  • asp

    lets see what happens…
    there is absolutly nothing wrong with latin american leaders getting together and wanting to be in charge of their destiny. and , not being interested in interferance from the united states

    i just find this “pampering ” of cuba to be very strange . i am tired of the usa embargo,but what gets my attention about this is these hovering ominous ideological implications that are seeping through that are directly affecting dynamics in south america

    why a brutal dictatorship like cuba would be “pampered” and made the center of attention strikes me as strange when there are so many problems much greater to be dealt with in south america than whether the united states acceptst cuba or not.

    it looks like the usa blew a big wad when it got seriously involved with the cold war in south america, over throwing democraticly elected leaders in several countries and giving support to dictatorships.

    for sure its come back to bite the usa in its ass as political leaders run on anti american imperialistic populist slogans based on this past. and they get elected and start implementing programs that pay tribute to this hovering ominous ideology

    and support of this hovering ominous ideology can be seen very vividly when leaders like correa start saying there is nothing wrong with being freinds with farc….when farc guerlilas who surrender start saying their were 6 or 7 camps in equador and equadorian generals and drug dealers from around the world were coming to buy arms and drugs and that venezuela is sending them higher powered weapons

    venezuela’s chaves is seriously incriminated on the computors captured by columbia in the farc camp raid in equador, his support physicaly and ideologicly is obvious. and this farc is seriously affecting places like brazil with its proven and known ties to huge brazilian street gangs like beira mar and the pcc.

    this ominous ideoligy is being politicly spread through south america with financial support from chavez to various places like bolivia and argentina , and, if the usa was proven to be giving money to a candidate, that candidate would become a pariah.

    as well as chaves is openly interested in turning south american into his bolivian revolution , and started serious opresion of any opisition in his country ,a light version of true hard core comunist style of total elimination of the opisition

    so, being rid of unites states influence , even though it is the biggest trading partner with many of these countries, is not such a bad thing. but , if it is a back drop to brining in ideoligical links to marxist dictatorships like cuba ,which is being strangly romanticly idolised by some of these leaders , then their is a dark cloud forming on the horizan of latin america. not a cloud that requires some kind of represion, but a cloud that needs to be addressed by political leaders and how the want to run their countries , or get elected in future elections

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


You May Also Like

Brazil’s Stock Exchange Becomes World’s Third Largest and Plans Expansion

Brazil's stock exchange Bolsa de Valores de Sรฃo Paulo (Bovespa) has merged with the ...

US Irked by Brazil’s Insistence on Farm Subsidies Reduction

Brazil and India called on United States, European Union and Japan to open their ...

Brazilian Senate Considering Legalizing Marijuana

The legalization of the production, trade and use of marijuana was once again a ...

Brazil Gets Record Surplus and Stocks

Brazilian stocks reached record levels, despite the thin volume characteristic of the period between ...

Gaucho: A Military Van Built in Partnership by Brazil and Argentina

The armies of Argentina and Brazil presented last week in Brazil the first prototype ...

Brazilian Beef Gets Quality Seal

Like French champagne, camembert cheese and other famous products, farmers from the southwestern region ...

Brazil Puts Desktops in Every One of Its 5,560 Cities. Over 350.000 of Them

Brazil is installing 356,800 virtualized desktops in schools in all of Brazil's 5,560 municipalities. ...

Obama’s Trip to South America Pleases Brazil and Upsets Argentina

American president Barack Obama has announced that he will pay his first visit to ...

Brazil Takes Its Shoes to Las Vegas Trade Show

Brazilian shoe manufacturers will start in February the activities of the Brazilian Footwear, program ...

Brazil Gets the World’s 40th Place for Eco-Friendliness

Despite being the custodian of the world's largest forest, the Amazon, Brazil gets low ...