• Categories
  • Archives

Brazil’s Supreme Sides with Indians Ousted from their Ancestral Lands

Raposa Serra do Sol Indians Brazilian Supreme Court’s (STF) Commission on Jurisprudence denied the request of the National Agriculture and Livestock Confederation (CNA) that October 5, 1988, be the mark for the so-called “traditional indigenous occupation of land.”

Brazil’s federal Constitution states that “lands traditionally occupied by indigenous peoples” have to be recognized, demarcated and safeguarded by the government as indigenous territory.

As the Constitution was promulgated on October 5, 1988, the Federal Court judges concluded that this date be the temporal mark for the determination whether land was to be considered “traditionally occupied” or not, in the turbulent case on the contested demarcation of Raposa Serra do Sol, in the Northern state of Roraima.

This led the National Agriculture and Livestock Confederation to propose that this temporal mark be applied to all demarcation cases of indigenous areas. A so-called sumula vinculante, or binding abridgement in legal terms.

This would have created great obstacles in the demarcation process, because many indigenous peoples did not live right on their ancestral lands in 1988. Many of them had been expelled of their territory long before this date, over the course of decades, mostly by force of the expanding agriculture, in violent circumstances, with or without explicit help of the authorities and always against their will.

The Committee on Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court deferred the proposal on March 18. They concluded that the request of the CNA, first of all, did not meet the formal requisites of such a proposal and, secondly, that it is necessary to have various similar decisions in different court cases to justify a binding abridgement.

This is not the case. The Raposa Serra do Sol case was the first ruling that discussed this date as a temporal mark and made clear that even with this mark, there would be many possible exceptions. For example, in cases of forced removal of the indigenous community concerned.

The CIMI (Indigenist Missionary Council), through its Juridical Advisor, together with the indigenous organizations, had elaborated an opinion against the petition of the CNAP.

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

You Don’t Tell Me

According to the report, there are also approximately 4 million kids without a birth ...

Brazil Sure Widespread Distribution of Condoms Is the Answer to AIDS

The director of the Brazilian Ministry of Health’s National Sexually Transmitted Diseases and AIDS ...

Condoms for All: Brazil to Give Away 1 Billion of Them

Brazil’s Ministry of Health will buy around one billion condoms for free distribution in ...

Brazil Blames Crisis for Slowdown in Chicken Exports

Brazilian exports of chicken should end the year at between 3.6 million and 3.7 ...

Brazil Finds Light Oil Offshore. 150 Million Barrels This Time

Petrobras, the Brazilian state-controlled oil multinational announced this Monday, July 14, that it had ...

Brazil’s Lula Promises No Stone Unturned in Corruption Probe

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva promised Monday that in the fight against ...

In Brazil, Finding a Replacement for the Agonizing Democracy

In the Brazilian magazine Caros Amigos (Dear Friends), one of the last bastions of ...

Brazil’s Lula Calls Education Expenses a “Sacred Investment”

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva said that his Administration does not view ...

Brazilian Study Shows Hydropower Pollutes 4 Times More than Fossil-Fuel

Hydropower plants have long been a byword for clean energy. But researchers warn that ...