Brazil’s Supreme Sides with Indians Ousted from their Ancestral Lands

Raposa Serra do Sol Indians Brazilian Supreme Court’s (STF) Commission on Jurisprudence denied the request of the National Agriculture and Livestock Confederation (CNA) that October 5, 1988, be the mark for the so-called “traditional indigenous occupation of land.”

Brazil’s federal Constitution states that “lands traditionally occupied by indigenous peoples” have to be recognized, demarcated and safeguarded by the government as indigenous territory.

As the Constitution was promulgated on October 5, 1988, the Federal Court judges concluded that this date be the temporal mark for the determination whether land was to be considered “traditionally occupied” or not, in the turbulent case on the contested demarcation of Raposa Serra do Sol, in the Northern state of Roraima.

This led the National Agriculture and Livestock Confederation to propose that this temporal mark be applied to all demarcation cases of indigenous areas. A so-called sumula vinculante, or binding abridgement in legal terms.

This would have created great obstacles in the demarcation process, because many indigenous peoples did not live right on their ancestral lands in 1988. Many of them had been expelled of their territory long before this date, over the course of decades, mostly by force of the expanding agriculture, in violent circumstances, with or without explicit help of the authorities and always against their will.

The Committee on Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court deferred the proposal on March 18. They concluded that the request of the CNA, first of all, did not meet the formal requisites of such a proposal and, secondly, that it is necessary to have various similar decisions in different court cases to justify a binding abridgement.

This is not the case. The Raposa Serra do Sol case was the first ruling that discussed this date as a temporal mark and made clear that even with this mark, there would be many possible exceptions. For example, in cases of forced removal of the indigenous community concerned.

The CIMI (Indigenist Missionary Council), through its Juridical Advisor, together with the indigenous organizations, had elaborated an opinion against the petition of the CNAP.

Tags:

You May Also Like

In London, Lula Stresses Brazil’s Leading Role in Renewable Fuel

In his speech, Tuesday, March 7, during a state dinner offered by Queen Elizabeth ...

Golden Chainsaw for Lula and Other Enemies of Brazil’s Amazon

Greenpeace, inspired by recent news from the Brazilian government, which shows that last year ...

Brazilian President Accuses Israel of Carrying Out a Massacre in Gaza

Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff hits Israel hard calling the country responsible for carrying out ...

Despite All Brazil and US Have Common Goal in Middle East, Says Deputy Secretary of State

US deputy secretary of State, William Joseph Burns, talked yesterday, March 1st, in Rio ...

Brazilian Roberta Pereira Aims to Introduce Latin Audiences to Broadway

Growing up in Rio, Roberta Pereira became a fan of the theater after seeing ...

Brazil Retaliates and Starts Delaying Argentina’s Trucks on the Border

Miguel Jorge, Brazil's minister of Development Industry and Trade, confirmed that the Brazilian government ...

Brazil’s Açaí­ Berry Shown to Kill Cancer Cells in Florida University Study

A Brazilian berry popular in health food contains antioxidants that destroyed cultured human cancer ...

Brasília's air control tower known as Cindacta-1 in Brazil

Command of English Would Have Prevented Brazil’s Worst Air Tragedy Ever

Brazil's worst air accident ever, on September 29, 2006, when an executive Legacy jet ...

Foot and Mouth Hits Argentina Cattle and Brazil Feels the Pain

The detection of foot-and-mouth in Argentina is bad news for major beef producers throughout ...

Despite US$ 1.5 Billion Surplus Brazil Blames China for Unfair Competition

Trade between Brazil and China jumped a lot between 2000 and 2005, from US$ ...