• Categories
  • Archives

Brazil’s Appeals Court Denies Moral Damages Against Cigarette Maker

Warning in Brazilian cigarette pack The 4th Panel of the Superior Justice Court (STJ), the highest Brazilian appeal court, by unanimous vote (3×0), denied the claim for indemnification for moral damages brought against the cigarette manufacturer Souza Cruz, the Brazilian branch of British American Tobacco Group – BAT.

The suit had been brought by family members of ex-smoker Vitorino Mattiazzi, in the estimated amount of 490,000 reais (US$ 280,000).

This was the first time the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice reviewed the merits of a lawsuit for indemnification for damages attributed to the consumption of cigarettes, and their decision confirmed the majority of the rulings adopted by Brazilian courts in first and second instances in decisions already handed down in similar cases. In all 290 lawsuits with final rulings in Brazil, such indemnification claims were denied.

The case that was reviewed by the Superior Court of Justice began in 2005 in the city of Cerro Largo (state of Rio Grande do Sul, 490 km from capital Porto Alegre), when the widow of Vitorino Mattiazzi filed a lawsuit alleging that her husband was unaware of the risks associated with smoking, had been induced by misleading advertising and had died from respiratory illnesses which the widow attributed, exclusively, to the consumption of cigarettes manufactured by Souza Cruz. As redress, she claimed indemnification for moral damages in an amount greater than 2,000 minimum wages.

At first instance, Judge Guilherme Eugenio Mafassioli Correa did not accept the argument of “lack of awareness” of the risks associated with smoking, pointing out that the sale of cigarettes is legal and that it is not possible to prove that the person exclusively smoked products manufactured by Souza Cruz, since these are not the only cigarettes available on the market.

Further, he emphasized that “there is no way to hold third parties liable for a decision that is eminently one’s own, individual, as is the case here. Even if it were questions of status when Vitorino began smoking, he could have opted not to smoke. Certainly there are people who did so.”

The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS), where the justices shifted the burden of proof during the judgment session and accepted the claim of indemnification, ruling that Souza Cruz should have proven that it did not manufacture the cigarettes smoked by Mr. Mattiazzi.

Further, the reporting justice assumed, based on generic data extracted from the Internet, that Mr. Mattiazzi’s disease had been caused by smoking cigarettes, although such causation link had not been evidenced in the evidentiary phase.

Souza Cruz then filed a special appeal to the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, which was granted. The justices of the 4th panel confirmed the understanding that cigarettes are a product with known inherent risks, the consumption of which is a decision made exclusively by the consumer, and that, in the sphere of civil liability, the causation link should not be established based on presumption, i.e. grounded on statistical data.

Moreover, the Reporting Justice mentioned that the cigarette advertising does not interfere in the free will of the consumers, who may choose to smoke or not. These, among other factors, according to the Justices, exclude the manufacturers from liability for alleged damages associated with smoking.

This was the first ruling on merits on the matter rendered by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice which, till now, had only reviewed the issue of the statute of limitations being applicable to claims of this nature, confirming the understanding that the period to be applied is five years, as expressly provided in the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code.

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

Obama’s Debt to His Brazilian Readers

Barack Obama owes us another journey to Brazil. Not as president, but as a ...

Lula and Ortega Discuss Honduras. They Still Don’t Recognize Lobo as President

The presidents of Brazil and Nicaragua, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva and Daniel Ortega, ...

Brazil’s Ethics Council Gives Whistle Blower Congressman the Boot

The Ethics Council of Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies voted unanimously, 14 to 0, in ...

Over Half of Brazil’s New Cars Run on Gas, Ethanol or a Mix of Both

Demand for ethanol made from sugar cane is booming in Brazil, where it is ...

Brazil Wants to Use Sports for Social Improvement

Within 45 days Brazil’s National Sports Policy will be defined and officially approved, according ...

A Lesson Passed from Father to Son in Brazil: He Who Doesn’t Steal Is a Sucker

Distinguished reader, lovely lady reader, put yourself in the shoes of someone who has ...

Antônia Joyce Venâncio and her dolls

All But White: Brazil’s Treasure-Trove of Black, Oriental, Handicapped Dolls

Businesswoman Antônia Joyce Venâncio has been having success since she bet on a market ...

Kenya and Brazil Have Been Finding Ways to Improve Bilateral Relations

Brazil wants to strengthen its political and commercial ties with Kenya. The Kenyan chancellor, ...

It All Started in Caetés

Lula journeyed from a little Ceará town to Brasília’s Presidential Palace,  he went from ...

Syria and Jordan Interested in Importing Food from Brazil

The director-general at the department of food purchases of the Syrian government, Mohsen Abdel ...