• Categories
  • Archives

Brazil’s Appeals Court Denies Moral Damages Against Cigarette Maker

Warning in Brazilian cigarette pack The 4th Panel of the Superior Justice Court (STJ), the highest Brazilian appeal court, by unanimous vote (3×0), denied the claim for indemnification for moral damages brought against the cigarette manufacturer Souza Cruz, the Brazilian branch of British American Tobacco Group – BAT.

The suit had been brought by family members of ex-smoker Vitorino Mattiazzi, in the estimated amount of 490,000 reais (US$ 280,000).

This was the first time the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice reviewed the merits of a lawsuit for indemnification for damages attributed to the consumption of cigarettes, and their decision confirmed the majority of the rulings adopted by Brazilian courts in first and second instances in decisions already handed down in similar cases. In all 290 lawsuits with final rulings in Brazil, such indemnification claims were denied.

The case that was reviewed by the Superior Court of Justice began in 2005 in the city of Cerro Largo (state of Rio Grande do Sul, 490 km from capital Porto Alegre), when the widow of Vitorino Mattiazzi filed a lawsuit alleging that her husband was unaware of the risks associated with smoking, had been induced by misleading advertising and had died from respiratory illnesses which the widow attributed, exclusively, to the consumption of cigarettes manufactured by Souza Cruz. As redress, she claimed indemnification for moral damages in an amount greater than 2,000 minimum wages.

At first instance, Judge Guilherme Eugenio Mafassioli Correa did not accept the argument of “lack of awareness” of the risks associated with smoking, pointing out that the sale of cigarettes is legal and that it is not possible to prove that the person exclusively smoked products manufactured by Souza Cruz, since these are not the only cigarettes available on the market.

Further, he emphasized that “there is no way to hold third parties liable for a decision that is eminently one’s own, individual, as is the case here. Even if it were questions of status when Vitorino began smoking, he could have opted not to smoke. Certainly there are people who did so.”

The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS), where the justices shifted the burden of proof during the judgment session and accepted the claim of indemnification, ruling that Souza Cruz should have proven that it did not manufacture the cigarettes smoked by Mr. Mattiazzi.

Further, the reporting justice assumed, based on generic data extracted from the Internet, that Mr. Mattiazzi’s disease had been caused by smoking cigarettes, although such causation link had not been evidenced in the evidentiary phase.

Souza Cruz then filed a special appeal to the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, which was granted. The justices of the 4th panel confirmed the understanding that cigarettes are a product with known inherent risks, the consumption of which is a decision made exclusively by the consumer, and that, in the sphere of civil liability, the causation link should not be established based on presumption, i.e. grounded on statistical data.

Moreover, the Reporting Justice mentioned that the cigarette advertising does not interfere in the free will of the consumers, who may choose to smoke or not. These, among other factors, according to the Justices, exclude the manufacturers from liability for alleged damages associated with smoking.

This was the first ruling on merits on the matter rendered by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice which, till now, had only reviewed the issue of the statute of limitations being applicable to claims of this nature, confirming the understanding that the period to be applied is five years, as expressly provided in the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code.

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

How Brazil’s Lula Is Fooling the World

Lula’s party, the PT, covered up its historic radicalism during Brazil’s presidential campaign with ...

Once again: Brazilians Are Not Hispanic

A number of the diverse populations who migrated to Brazil include: Portugal, Italy, Poland, ...

Two New Laws for Brazil’s Disabled

Yesterday, December 2, Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva signed a decree regulating ...

Brazilians in the West Bank Might Not Be Able to Vote for President

There are currently 93 electoral zones abroad, some of them comprising more than one ...

Brazil’s Bradesco Buys Mexican Bank and Has Plans for Mexico

Bradesco, Brazil’s second largest private bank, announced Friday that it plans to enter the ...

New Discovery of Oil and Gas by Brazil Amounts to Half the Country’s Reserves

Petrobras, Brazil's state-controlled oil company, announced this Thursday, November 8, that it has discovered ...

Brazilian Party Accuses Police of Being Too Harsh in Fighting Corruption Case

Known as Operation Voucher, the August 9 Brazil’s Federal Police dragnet resulted in the ...

Contrary to Experts Brazil’s Finance Minister Forecasts a Minimum 4% GDP Growth

Guido Mantega, Brazil’s  Finance Minister is still maintaining his estimate of growth of between ...

Brazil Sees Dramatic Increase in Tourist Dollar

Expenditure in dollars of foreign tourists in Brazil and the arrival of international flights increased ...

Fimma Fair, Brazil’s Furniture Showcase

The Machines, Raw Materials and Accessories Trade Fair for the Furniture Industry, Fimma Brasil, ...