• Categories
  • Archives

Brazil’s Appeals Court Denies Moral Damages Against Cigarette Maker

Warning in Brazilian cigarette pack The 4th Panel of the Superior Justice Court (STJ), the highest Brazilian appeal court, by unanimous vote (3×0), denied the claim for indemnification for moral damages brought against the cigarette manufacturer Souza Cruz, the Brazilian branch of British American Tobacco Group – BAT.

The suit had been brought by family members of ex-smoker Vitorino Mattiazzi, in the estimated amount of 490,000 reais (US$ 280,000).

This was the first time the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice reviewed the merits of a lawsuit for indemnification for damages attributed to the consumption of cigarettes, and their decision confirmed the majority of the rulings adopted by Brazilian courts in first and second instances in decisions already handed down in similar cases. In all 290 lawsuits with final rulings in Brazil, such indemnification claims were denied.

The case that was reviewed by the Superior Court of Justice began in 2005 in the city of Cerro Largo (state of Rio Grande do Sul, 490 km from capital Porto Alegre), when the widow of Vitorino Mattiazzi filed a lawsuit alleging that her husband was unaware of the risks associated with smoking, had been induced by misleading advertising and had died from respiratory illnesses which the widow attributed, exclusively, to the consumption of cigarettes manufactured by Souza Cruz. As redress, she claimed indemnification for moral damages in an amount greater than 2,000 minimum wages.

At first instance, Judge Guilherme Eugenio Mafassioli Correa did not accept the argument of “lack of awareness” of the risks associated with smoking, pointing out that the sale of cigarettes is legal and that it is not possible to prove that the person exclusively smoked products manufactured by Souza Cruz, since these are not the only cigarettes available on the market.

Further, he emphasized that “there is no way to hold third parties liable for a decision that is eminently one’s own, individual, as is the case here. Even if it were questions of status when Vitorino began smoking, he could have opted not to smoke. Certainly there are people who did so.”

The plaintiff appealed to the Court of Appeals of Rio Grande do Sul (TJRS), where the justices shifted the burden of proof during the judgment session and accepted the claim of indemnification, ruling that Souza Cruz should have proven that it did not manufacture the cigarettes smoked by Mr. Mattiazzi.

Further, the reporting justice assumed, based on generic data extracted from the Internet, that Mr. Mattiazzi’s disease had been caused by smoking cigarettes, although such causation link had not been evidenced in the evidentiary phase.

Souza Cruz then filed a special appeal to the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice, which was granted. The justices of the 4th panel confirmed the understanding that cigarettes are a product with known inherent risks, the consumption of which is a decision made exclusively by the consumer, and that, in the sphere of civil liability, the causation link should not be established based on presumption, i.e. grounded on statistical data.

Moreover, the Reporting Justice mentioned that the cigarette advertising does not interfere in the free will of the consumers, who may choose to smoke or not. These, among other factors, according to the Justices, exclude the manufacturers from liability for alleged damages associated with smoking.

This was the first ruling on merits on the matter rendered by the Brazilian Superior Court of Justice which, till now, had only reviewed the issue of the statute of limitations being applicable to claims of this nature, confirming the understanding that the period to be applied is five years, as expressly provided in the Brazilian Consumer Protection Code.

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

Rio Favelas Are Hurting the Brazilian Army

Rio’s favelas are not good for the Brazilian army. Conflict resolution is not the ...

Brazilian Shoe Makers Get a Hand from Government to Export

Brazilian manufacturers of machinery and components for shoes will count on US$ 14.2 million ...

Brazil Sells US$ 75 Bi to Poor Countries and Only US$ 62 Bi to the US and the Rich

The importance of emerging countries to the Brazilian balance of trade has already surpassed ...

The US Is on the Expansion Plans of Brazil’s Nobel Bookstore

Livraria Nobel, which calls itself the largest chain of bookshops in Brazil, plans to ...

Brazilian-Spanish Couple Pedals for 10 Years Around the World for UN

The Brazilian Miyuki Okabe and the Spanish Eneko Etxebarrieta were listening to the radio ...

Brazil Gets Its Own Port on the Pacific

The second week of December will see the launching of two major regional projects ...

Payback Time in Brazil: Friends Get Cabinet Post

March 15th was the 20th anniversary of Brazil’s latest experiment with democracy. For the ...

Brazil Believes It Can Have Social Indicators of Rich Country in 6 Years

Brazil may achieve social indicators similar to those of developed countries by 2016 if ...

Cathedral of Brasília, in the Brazil's Capital

Government, Industry, Unions, Media, Church, They’re All Bankrupt in Brazil

You can’t deny it: in Brazil public authority is melting like ice cream under ...

Congressman Names Names in Brazilian Graft Scandal, But Lula’s Party Denies All

In testimony yesterday before the Ethics Council of the Brazilian Chamber of Deputies, the ...