Former Speaker of the House Found Guilty in Brazil’s Mensalão Scandal

Brazil's Justice Cezar Peluso Ten of the Brazilian Supreme Court justices have now voted on the first part of Penal Case 470, known as the mensalão (big monthly allowance). This Thursday, August 30, the Chief Justice will vote, ending this first phase.

The highlight of the case so far is that eight out of the eleven justices on the court have found federal deputy, and the former president of the Chamber of Deputies, João Paulo Cunha, guilty of passive corruption and at least one count of malfeasance.

At the same time, Marcos Valério and his partners in advertising agencies, Cristiano Paz and Ramon Hollerback, have been found guilty of active corruption, embezzlement and money laundering by most of the justices who have voted so far.

The same is true of Henrique Pizzolato, a former director in the Banco do Brasil, who has been found guilty of passive corruption, malfeasance and money laundering.

Sentencing in cases at the Brazilian Supreme Court usually only takes place at the end of oral presentations of the justice’s votes.

But, because of mandatory retirement next week, justice Cezar Peluso presented his vote yesterday and added sentences: a total of six years for Cunha (and forfeiture of his seat in Congress) for passive corruption and malfeasance (“peculato”).

Sixteen years for Marcos Valério, ten years and eight months for both Ramon Hollerbach and Cristiano Paz, all for active corruption and embezzlement – misappropriation of public funds (“peculato”).

Finally, Peluso sentenced Henrique Pizzolato to eight years and four months for passive corruption and malfeasance (“peculato”). It should be noted that Peluso did not condemn anyone for money laundering.

During the period of oral presentation of their votes by the eleven Supreme Court justices it is permitted for any one of them to make changes in their votes.

That happened yesterday when justice Ricardo Lewandowski, the revisor, made a change. He had absolved João Paulo Cunha of one count of malfeasance, involving the hiring of a journalist, because it was his understanding that the crime did not exist.

Yesterday he said he would now base his not guilty verdict on a lack of evidence.

ABr

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

To Fight Arms Traffic Brazil Needs Cooperation Between Army and Federal Police

In Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, yesterday, July 3, Reiner Pungs, coordinator of the United ...

No More Rigid Coalitions: Brazilian Congress Ends Party Piggybacking

By a vote count of 329 to 142, Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies approved, Wednesday, ...

Brazil Sets Aside US$ 2.8 Million to Fund Research in Algae Biofuel

The Brazilian government is eager to fund the development of seaweed-based biodiesel production, Brazil ...

Brazilian Conservationist Kills Self to Protest Alcohol Plants

Francisco Anselmo de Barros, 65, wrapped himself in an alcohol-soaked blanket and set it ...

With Brazil’s Blessing and US’s Opposition Venezuela Breezes to UN Seat

The battle for a soon-to-be vacant non-permanent seat on the United Nations Security Council ...

Brazil Is Teaching World How to Deal with Economic Crisis, Says Lula

Brazilian President, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva says that Brazil is overcoming the current ...

Brazilian Newspaper Sues US Government Over “Return to Sender” Home Raids

New Jersey-based Brazilian newspaper Brazilian Voice and the Seton Hall Law School's Center for ...

At 6.5%, Brazil Inflation Hits Ceiling Set by the Government

The Broad Consumer Price Index (IPCA) closed out July at 0.01%, the Brazilian Geography ...

Tear Down the Wall!

Perhaps the most powerful argument for eliminating visa requirements is that they’re simply a ...