Brazil’s Rousseff Comes Out Swinging Against the Economist and in Defense of Lula

Brazilian president Dilma Rousseff The president of Brazil, Dilma Rousseff, once again repeated she would not be influenced by The Economist magazine’s call for her to sack Brazilian Finance minister Guido Mantega after a country’s growth report that fell short of government forecasts.

“Under no hypothesis will a Brazilian government elected by free and secret vote be influenced by the opinion of a magazine that isn’t Brazilian,” Rousseff told reporters in Brazilian capital Brasília. “We grew 0.6% last quarter and we’ll grow more in the next one.”

The London-based publication, in an article, “Breakdown of trust” urged Rousseff to fire Mantega for misleading investors with growth forecasts that were double the expansion registered in a third quarter report last week.

“She should fire Mr. Mantega, whose over-optimistic forecasts have lost investors’ confidence, and appoint a new team capable of regaining the trust of business,” the magazine wrote.

“In no way will I take under consideration this, shall we say, suggestion,” Rousseff responded. “I will not.”

Rousseff added that inflation is under control in Brazil, and unlike Europe, the country is not suffering a sovereign debt crisis.

Mantega was named Brazil’s finance minister in 2006 by Rousseff’s ally and predecessor Lula da Silva. In 2010, he presided over the country’s fastest growth in two decades, when GDP expanded 7.5% and won attention abroad for accusing rich nations of starting a “currency war” fueled by record-low interest rates.

The Economist recalls that when President Rousseff was elected the country’s economy was booming but then it grounded to a halt and is now struggling to recover.

“Despite increasingly frantic official efforts at stimulation, the moribund creature grew by only 0.6% in the third quarter – half the number forecast by Guido Mantega, the Finance minister. Most market analysts now expect GDP growth to be less than 1.5% this year and not much more than 3% next year.”

The motors of growth that powered Brazil in the past decade are sputtering. Prices of commodity exports, though still high, are no longer rising. Consumers are using more of their income to pay off the loans with which they had bought cars and televisions. Low unemployment means there are fewer idle hands to be put to work.

Instead of relying on consumption, growth now has to come from higher productivity and investment. That means hacking away at the “Brazil cost”: the combination of red tape, heavy taxes, expensive credit, creaking infrastructure and an overvalued currency that makes it a punishingly expensive country to do business in.

Ms Rousseff has recognized the need to improve competitiveness. Her economic team says its aim is to prompt a supply-side, investment-led recovery. In the past 15 months the Central Bank has slashed interest rates by 5.25 percentage points, to 7.25% (only two points above inflation).

That has helped to weaken the currency and help manufacturers. The government has cut payroll taxes for industry (but not most services). It is also slashing electricity tariffs and inviting private operators to upgrade airports, roads and railways.

Despite all this, investment has fallen in each of the past five quarters. It now amounts to just 18.7% of GDP, against 30% in Peru in 2011 and 27% in Chile and Colombia, Latin America’s new high-growth economies.

Business is cautious because the government meddles too much. A prime example is its apparent desire to drive down the return on investment by diktat, not just for banks but also for electricity companies and other infrastructure-providers. Even more than her predecessor, Lula da Silva, Ms Rousseff seems to believe that the state should direct private investment decisions. Such micro-meddling undermines trust in macroeconomic policy as well.

The Central Bank may be tempted to react to the latest figures with another interest-rate cut. That would be a mistake. Instead the government should redouble efforts to cut the Brazil cost – by, for instance, tackling labor laws – and thus letting the private sector’s animal spirits roar.

The worry is that the president herself is meddler-in-chief. But she insists she is pragmatic. If so, she should fire Mr Mantega, whose over-optimistic forecasts have lost investors’ confidence, and appoint a new team capable of regaining the trust of business.

Ms Rousseff’s hope seems to be that full employment and rising real wages will be enough to secure her a second term in 2014. But these depend on renewed growth. Lula da Silva won a second term because his policies lifted millions of Brazilians out of poverty.

The electorate similarly rewarded Fernando Henrique Cardoso, Lula da Silva’s predecessor, because he slew inflation. And Ms Rousseff? Voters may judge that in trying to juggle so many economic balls, she dropped most of them.
In Defense of Lula

Rousseff, currently on an official visit to France, described as ‘regrettable’ the accusations against her predecessor Lula published in the daily o Estado de S. Paulo and underlined her respect and admiration for the leader.

“I condemn all the attempts, and it is not the first time to tarnish and dismiss the great respect of the Brazilian people for him” said Rousseff at a press conference in the Elysee Palace next to her peer François Hollande.

“I consider despicable and pathetic the attempts to tarnish his image” added Rousseff who praised Lula as the president who ‘developed Brazil’ and established equal relations among developed and developing countries.

President Hollande joined the praise and said Lula is taken as a ‘reference’ in France and is considered “a man with a great image who has always defended the interests of Brazil”
According to O Estado, the former Brazilian president knew about and used funds from a far-reaching vote-buying scheme to pay for personal expenses, based on the testimony by a convicted former consultant to the ruling Workers’ Party.

The testimony, reported on Tuesday by the newspaper was given in September to Brazil’s attorney general’s office by Marcos Valério, an advertising executive recently convicted as a bagman in the scheme.

Valério also testified that an aide to the former president made veiled threats when the scandal erupted in efforts to keep him quiet, the newspaper said.

According to the report, Valério gave the testimony voluntarily in a bid to reduce his sentence after he and 24 other former Lula da Silva aides and associates were convicted in a landmark trial heard by Brazil’s Supreme Court.

Though he still received a stiff 40-year prison sentence, the circumstances of Valério’s testimony are likely to cast doubt on his claims. Among other crimes, Valério was convicted for handling the money used in the scheme, which involved payoffs to legislators in exchange for Congressional support.

The trial exposed crimes at the core of the administration of Brazil’s beloved former president and was hailed as a sign that the country is growing less tolerant of the corruption long rife in local, state, and national politics.

Lula, still Brazil’s most influential political figure has denied any knowledge of the scheme since it first came to light in 2005, roiling the first of his two terms.

Though Lula’s legacy has been tarnished by the convictions, the trial has done little to sap his star power – even after officials including a former treasurer of the Workers’ Party and Jose Dirceu, his once-powerful chief of staff, were convicted.

That could change if the allegations made by Valério were proven. Critics have long alleged that the scheme could not have been carried out without Lula’ da Silva’s knowledge, or tacit approval, but so far no proof of either has surfaced.



  • Show Comments (3)

  • Rhonda A. Dever

    “I condemn all the attempts, and it is not the first time to tarnish and dismiss the great respect of the Brazilian people for him” – If it is not the first time that the brazilian people dismiss their respect for this person, why is it they let him make another mistake to thei country and to the people? they should made a necessary action to discipline this person. see.

  • Lloyd Cata

    London Calling…
    This ‘suggestion’ by the “esteemed Western publication” #economist is just the first volley at encroaching back into ‘influencing’ Brazil’s economy. There is more to come, because the ‘money-center’ overlords do not like the “autonomous look” to what’s happening in Latin America and throughout the region.

    The Moody’s, Standard & Poors, and other so-called ‘rating’ agencies have been totally discredited as to their “objective outlook” on anything given their ‘practice of turning ‘junk securities’ into AAA investments. Of course, The Economist had it right all along, right?

    What Dilma and everyone who counts honestly knows is that there is a massive round of ‘global inflation’ coming. Inflation is specifically the intent of the Federal Reserve Bank, and they are furiously printing money($4T + $40B/mo) to ‘force’ an inflationary path forward. Don’t you know that inflation is a measure of ‘growth’ in a depressed economy? So unless they can get Latin America to sign on to this inflationary policy they are stuck eating their own straw dollars like donkeys. Somehow they have to ‘export inflation’ to remain the worlds reserve currency.

    Thank you, President Rousseff for showing the proper contempt for such advice from ‘any’ source outside of Brazil. Unlike Mr.Obama; having to bow to “foreign agendas and lobbies”, it is good to see the lady has spine, and does not bend with the breeze of discredited #economist(s).

    It was also good to see Christina when she came to the states to pay-off the ‘loansharks’ at the IMF, sending that French woman back to her cave. Now the ‘little gangsters’ try ankle-biting to trip her up, but its really Argentina that they want(…can you say FOOD?), without one measure to settle the Malvinas dispute.(…sorry I can’t hear you London, bad connection!)

  • Stan

    Great post! Thanks for information.

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


You May Also Like

Brazil Sends Over 1,000 Soldiers to Favela to Retrieve Stolen Rifles

Brazilian security forces, backed by tanks and helicopters, have carried out an operation to ...

Brazil’s Gol Gets 35% Boost in Demand with 76% of Seats Taken

Brazilian airline Gol announced that its preliminary data show that in December the company’s ...

Brazil Spends Over US$ 400,000 in Books by Indian Authors

Brazil’s Ministry of Education (MEC) allocated US$ 414,000 (1 million reais) from the Literate ...

Brazil Discusses Judicial Reform in London

The Brazilian Minister of Justice, Márcio Thomaz Bastos, discussed Brazilian judicial reform with Lord ...

Highways in Brazil: a Dead-end Road

Anyone entering a car, truck, or bus and driving on the Brazilian highways knows ...

Porto Ferreira Sells Brazilian Tiles to 115 Countries

Brazilian company Porto Ferreira, a maker of floor tiles, ceramics and facing, which is ...

Brazilian Study Shows That Humans Kept Animal Freezing Instinct

Standing still when a threat is detected is a defensive, protective reaction. This ancestral ...

19% in Brazil Have Computer at Home, 14% Get Internet

Nearly 20% of the Brazilian population have computers at home, and 14% have Internet ...

Brazil Creates World’s Third Largest Bourse, the US$ 20 Billion BM&F Bovespa

Cade (Administrative Council for Economic Defense), the Brazilian antitrust authority, approved the merger between ...

Group Finds Extreme Inequality and Lack of Infrastructure in Brazil

Brazil’s National Development Agenda was approved unanimously, Thursday, August 25, by the Brazilian Economic ...