Brazil Farmers Need New Standards of Productivity

The Brazilian Constitution determines that unproductive properties may be condemned for the purposes of Agrarian Reform. From this arises the question: What exactly are unproductive properties?

The law surrounding the subject considers property unproductive if it does not profitably utilize its land. This classification must be made by a professional by means of an inspection.


In the inspections the inspector first verifies the extent to which the land is being effectively developed in the property; after that he compares the production obtained by the various sources of cultivation and of cattle production on the inspected property, taking into consideration data of the median income of Brazilian plantations in relation to the same products.


A property that utilizes a very small part of its lands or whose income is below the median is classified as unproductive and, therefore, can be condemned for the constitution of registration of Agrarian Reform.


The table containing the indicators of income and cattle productivity was made in the 1970s. Since then Brazilian agriculture has been modernized and become much more productive.


However, the table of indicators has not been modified, and this allows plantations which have already overexploited their properties’ productivity to escape being classified as unproductive.


In Paraná only 8 of 148 property inspections resulted in the property being classified as unproductive. With new indices the result would obviously be much higher.


The outdated indicators lead to delays in the condemnation process and cause owners who fail inspections to dispute the condemnation laws with the government. This raises the stakes for the process of Agrarian Reform and does what it can to render the process slower overall.


In 1999 the Minister of Agrarian Reform carried out studies in order to update the indicators of income (or, “indices of productivity,” as they call them).


Two institutes known for their competency and aptitude undertook the survey: Unicamp and Embrapa. The two acted separately and arrived at practically the same conclusions.


In keeping with the law, the Ministers of Agrarian Development and Agriculture should have issued, as reviewed by the National Council of Agricultural Development, the instruction by INCRA (National Institute of Agrarian Colonization and Reform) to establish the new indicators.


But large plantation owners came together to prevent this from happening.


In the proposal to the Second National Plan of Agricultural Reform, brought to President Lula in December 2003, the need to issue this instruction (p. 38) was demonstrated, with the goal of making possible the implementation of the established record.


But, until now, April 2005, it still hasn’t managed to be issued, clearly due to resistance from the large plantation owners.


When the massacre occurred at Felisburgo, in Minas Gerais, a commission of civil service representatives requested that President Lula establish the indices, as a necessary provision to accelerate the process of Agrarian Reform, which is currently running behind the set goals of the government – goals that are at the median of the goals proposed by the same specialists who improved the Plan.


On the occasion of Sister Dorothy’s assassination, the same commission renewed their request.


The decision they chose to take, however, was not to immediately issue the new indicators based on the studies from 1999, which were already ready, but rather to do a new study. It is reported that this was already done and discussed in the highest spheres of government.


It is hoped that the Lula government will face this veto and issue the new indices, in order not to stay in the same position of past governments, which always cited lack of information to do something other than that which was already being done”


Plí­nio Arruda Sampaio is the president of ABRA (Brazilian Association of Agrarian Reform) and member of the team that developed the National Plan of Agrarian Reform, which was presented to the government in 2003.

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

LETTERS

After three years of success with inflation brought to its lowest level in 40 ...

Brazilians facing delays in airport

Brazilians Start to Stand Up for Their Rights

Brazilians often seem passive in the face of injustice and reluctant to take direct ...

In LatAm Uruguay Is Number 1 in Democracy, Brazil Is at End of Line

Uruguay is the country in Latinamerica which most supports democracy and has most trust ...

41 Countries Discuss in Brazil How to Reforest

Forest specialists from 41 countries are gathered in Petrópolis, in the mountainous region of ...

Brazil's bovine meat

Thanks to Russia and US Brazil’s Beef Exports Grow 39%

Brazilian exports of bovine meat yielded US$ 443 million in May, a new monthly ...

Brazil’s Lula Inaugurates Mercosur Parliament and Declares FTAA Dead

Despite constant trade disputes Mercosur this Thursday found respite and motive to celebrate with ...

According to the Music

Since the beginning of the twentieth century Brazilian popular music has reflected the social ...

How to Beat Fraud and Still Make Money Doing Business in Brazil

As more companies are expanding their operations and staking claim in the Latin American ...

3000 Meet to Keep Brazil’s Fast Pace in 2005

The three thousand businessmen to meet as from today, November 22, at the 24th ...