Lula Vows Again to Keep Palocci as Brazil’s Finance Minister

Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva ratified his "full confidence" in Finance Minister Antonio Palocci and considers "normal" the controversy with cabinet chief Dilma Rousseff regarding the magnitude of the fiscal surplus.

"Palocci has my full and total confidence and Brazil owes him very much", said Lula da Silva Saturday in an interview with several broadcasting stations in São Paulo.

The Brazilian President went on to enumerate the results of Mr. Palocci’s three year performance particularly in containing inflation, growth, job creation and foreign trade.

"I’m not sure an economist would have achieved what Mr. Palocci has done with Brazil’s finances", he added.

"Mr. Palocci will continue as my Finance Minister", he highlighted.

The 45 year Minister, who’s actually a doctor, had been under attack during recent weeks from Ms. Rousseff regarding his orthodox fiscal policy and allegations of corruption from the time he was mayor of the city of Ribeirão Preto, São Paulo state (2000/2002).

President Lula brushed aside the controversy with Rousseff who has publicly questioned Palocci’s objective of establishing a long term adjustment program and demanded more flexibility regarding budget outlays.

"It’s normal for two ministers to disagree until government doesn’t make a decision", insisted the Brazilian President.

"Palocci is an extremely important minister for the government. Dilma Rousseff is an extremely important minister for the government".

President Lula said that Palocci acts as "any treasurer, as anybody responsible for finances anywhere in the world" preventing expenses to surpass income. As to the corruption claims against Mr. Palocci, President Lula said he was convinced that if his minister was invited to testimony before a Congressional committee, he will go, "because who’s clean has nothing to fear".

In the Congressional hearing last Wednesday Mr. Palocci explained the extent of his economic and tight fiscal policy, but could yet be summoned to testify before another committee that is investigating alleged corruption scandals involving the ruling Workers Party and which has seen several ministers and Congress members resign.

The more political wing of the Brazilian cabinet questions Palocci’s tight money policy and budget inflexibility looking ahead to the 2006 re-election chances of President Lula.

This article appeared originally in Mercopress – www.mercopress.com.

Tags:

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

In Brazil Corruption Launders More Money than Drug and Numbers Game Mafias

Corruption is the chief crime behind money-laundering in Brazil, in the opinion of the ...

Brazil Just US$ 3 Billion Short of Year’s Surplus Goal: US$ 44 Billion

Brazilian exports generated US$ 11.86 billion in November, a record value for the month, ...

In Brazil, a Husband Can Never Be a Rapist

A study entitled "The Brazilian Women in the Public and Private Spheres" drawn up ...

Brazil’s Reserves Fall Close to US$ 1 Billion

Brazil’s total current accounts (covering all international financial transactions) had a surplus of US$ ...

Brazil’s Lula Praises Press as Inevitable Medicine

In his first open-ended collective press interview since taking office two years and four ...

In a Veiled Threat, Brazilian Military Denounce Lula for Corruption

Since relinquishing in 1985 the power they held for 21 years, the Brazilian Military ...

We Need to Get Closer, Says Brazilian Minister to Arabs

The minister of Foreign Relations of Brazil, Celso Amorim, stated that the Summit of ...

Brazil Has 8 Judges, But Only 2 Public Defenders per 100,000 People

Brazil’s National Justice Council (Conselho Nacional de Justiça), which is presided over by Supreme ...

Brazilian Movies and the Joy of Killing

Films which make a spectacle of violence make difficult the discussion which they intend ...