Greenpeace Urges in Brazil Ban on Terminator Technologies

Greenpeace called upon the 188 states at the 8th meeting of the Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) being held in Curitiba, capital of the Brazilian southern state of Paraná, to maintain the moratorium on the field trials and commercial releases of Terminator seed technology which was agreed six years ago.

"Some states like New Zealand along with a number of biotech companies now want to sneak language into the text that would actually allow for a ‘case by case’ assessment of such technologies to open the door to field testing, while they officially claim to uphold the moratorium", said Greenpeace International’s Benedikt Haerlin from the Convention.

"This technology threatens biodiversity, farmers rights and the environment – what is needed is a ban on these technologies and not an erosion of the moratorium under the pretext of scientific impact and risk assessment," said Haerlin.

Terminators, or GURTS (Genetic Use Restriction Technologies), are a class of genetic engineering technologies which allow companies to introduce seeds whose sterile offspring cannot reproduce, preventing farmers from re-planting seeds from their own fields.

The seeds could also be used to introduce specific traits which would only be triggered off by the application of proprietary chemicals provided exclusively by the same companies.

Terminator technologies would allow companies to prevent the public from accessing the results of future breeding, which is the present rationale of plant breeders’ rights and even patents. The moratorium adopted by the Convention on Biodiversity in 2000, discussed the need for more information on the socio-economic, cultural and environmental impacts of these technologies.

"Nothing in the past six years has changed the status quo. Rather, all the additional information we now have on the impact of these technologies confirms that sterility is not a viable means to protect agricultural biodiversity, that it poses a potential threat to food security and that it would have severe impacts on the livelihoods of farmers around the world," concluded Haerlin.

Greenpeace – www.greenpeace.org

Tags:

You May Also Like

Cost Brazil Doesn’t Allow the Country to Cut Import Tariffs

The Brazilian industry intends to follow closely the negotiations at the 6th Ministerial Meeting ...

How the US Through Bullying and Humiliation Is Alienating Brazilians

During the military regime in Brazil, journalist Fernando Gabeira was among the team of young ...

Chevron’s Oil Spill in Brazil Leads Experts to Ask for Urgent New Survey in the Area

Brazilian specialists have become seriously worried about more oil spills off the coast of ...

Overpopulated

Brazil started the century with 17 million people and ended it with an estimated ...

Brazil’s Farming Boom Favors Mostly the Midwest

Income from farming in the main crops in Brazil should reach 160.6 billion Brazilian ...

Brazil’s New-Found Prosperity Is Powering Economy

Brazil's 6% industrial production growth in 2007 over the previous year was mainly boosted ...

An ethanol distillery in the state of Paraná, south of Brazil

Brazil Expects Half of Its Ethanol Industry to Be Foreign Owned

The participation of foreign capital in the Brazilian ethanol industry should reach 50% in ...

Brazil’s Petrobras Joins Exxon to Explore Oil in the Black Sea

Petrobras, Brazil’s government controlled oil and gas multinational, is in talks to buy a ...

Brazil Tries to Cut Red Tape on Biodiversity Research

The Brazilian Institute for the Environment and Natural Resources (Ibama) is seeking input – ...

Egypt Company to Invest Up to US$ 1 Million to Grow Rice in Brazil

Rice, a company from Egypt, wishes to invest from US$ 500,000 to US$ 1 ...