Brazilian Sex Muse Dresses in Paint to Celebrate Rio Olympics
The Rio Olympics has their "sex muse" promoted by Playboy magazine, Mexico edition, with ...

Read more

In Rio, Cocaine with the Olympic Seal of Excellence
Rio Olympic Games scheduled to be opened in just a few days time is facing all sorts of l...

Read more

Olympics: Out of the Bottle, the Genie of Fear Is Loose on the Streets of Rio
The Olympics remains a black hole of needless expenditure, sucking services into it with ...

Read more

The 10,000 Men from Rio Olympics Security Forces Were Trained by Israel
Next month's summer Olympic Games in Rio de Janeiro will take place under watchful eyes o...

Read more

Rio's Residents Cashing In on the Olympics Renting Their Houses to Tourists
The chance to cash in on the Rio 2016 Games has encouraged thousands of local Rio residen...

Read more

Brazil Calls Men Plotting a Terror Attack During the Olympics Complete Amateurs
Brazil's Federal Police (PF) have announced that the ten people arrested as part of Oper...

Read more

Brazil Betting Foreign Olympic Tourists Will Want to Travel Beyond Rio
They will watch volleyball, soccer, basketball, judo, swimming and fencing matches, but ...

Read more

Five Challenges to Visit Brazil Through the Eyes of Foreigners Living There
A survey conducted by InterNations, the largest network and information site for people w...

Read more

Brazil's Dual Legacy of Slavery and the Monarchy
What do most Americans know of Brazil? Hardly more than the samba, the homeland of rich s...

Read more

Brazil's Presidential Impeachment Sounds More Like a Political Mutiny
On June 27, a board of experts charged with investigating the accusations against Brazili...

Read more

Brazilian Sex Muse Dresses in Paint to Celebrate...
In Rio, Cocaine with the Olympic Seal of...
Olympics: Out of the Bottle, the Genie of...
The 10,000 Men from Rio Olympics Security Forces...
Rio's Residents Cashing In on the Olympics Renting...
Brazil Calls Men Plotting a Terror Attack During...
Brazil Betting Foreign Olympic Tourists Will Want to...
Five Challenges to Visit Brazil Through the Eyes...
Brazil's Dual Legacy of Slavery and the Monarchy...
Brazil's Presidential Impeachment Sounds More Like a Political...

Hundreds of LatAm Scholars Ask President Obama to Reject Free-Market Model

US President, Barack Obama 368 academics specializing in Latin America. anticipating a democratic victory in the November 4 US presidential elections sent a letter urging Senator and presidential candidate Barack Obama to become a partner, rather than an adversary, concerning changes already under way in Latin America. 

Above all, the signers are asking Senator Obama to understand the current impetus for progressive change in many of the region's countries: the rejection of what they call failed "free-market" model of economic growth that has been imposed in most countries since the early 1980s.

For this group this period has seen the worst economic growth failure in the region, in terms of per capita GDP, in over a century but also the adoption of more socially just and environmentally sustainable development styles.

The signers expressed their hope that an Obama administration will embrace the opportunity to inaugurate a new period of hemispheric understanding and collaboration for the welfare of the entire Hemisphere.

Most of those signing are members of the Latin American Studies Association, the largest and most influential professional association of its kind in the world. Signers include Eric Hershberg, President of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA) and twelve LASA past presidents, along with over 350 other academics and Latin America experts.

The letter follows:

October 20, 2008

Dear Senator Obama:

We write to offer our congratulations on your campaign and to express our hope that as the next president of the United States you will take advantage of an historic opportunity to improve relations with Latin America.  As scholars of the region, we also wish to convey our analysis regarding the process of change now underway in Latin America.

Just as the people of the United States have begun to debate basic questions regarding the sort of society they want - thanks in part to your own candidacy but also owing to the magnitude of the current financial crisis - so too have the people of Latin America.

In fact, the debate about a just and fair society has been going on in Latin America for more than a decade, and the majority are opting, like you and so many of us in the United States, for hope and change.

As academics personally and professionally committed to development and democracy in Latin America, we are hopeful that during your presidency the United States can become a partner rather than an adversary to the positive changes already under way in the hemisphere.

The current impetus for change in Latin America is a rejection of the model of economic growth that has been imposed in most countries since the early 1980s, a model that has concentrated wealth, relied unsuccessfully on unrestricted market forces to solve deep social problems and undermined human welfare.

The current rejection of this model is broad-based and democratic. In fact, contemporary movements for change in Latin America reveal significantly increased participation by workers and peasants, women, Afro-descendants and indigenous peoples - in a word, the grassroots.

Such movements are coming to power in country after country. They are neither puppets, nor blinded by fanaticism and ideology, as caricatured by some mainstream pundits. To the contrary, these movements deserve our respect, friendship and support.

Latin Americans have often viewed the United States not as a friend but as an oppressor, the guarantor of an international economic system that works against them, rather than for them - the very antithesis of hope and change. The Bush Administration has made matters much worse, and U.S. prestige in the region is now at a historic low. 

Washington's tendency to fight against hope and change has been especially prominent in recent U.S. responses to the democratically elected governments of Venezuela and Bolivia. While anti-American feelings run deep, history demonstrates that these feelings can change.

In the 1930s, after two decades of conflict with the region, the United States swore off intervention and adopted a Good Neighbor Policy. Not coincidentally, it was the most harmonious time in the history of U.S.-Latin American relations. In the 1940s, nearly every country in the region became our ally in World War Two. It can happen again.

There are many other challenges, too. Colombia, the main focus of the Bush Administration's policy, is currently the scene of the second largest humanitarian crisis in the world, with four million internally displaced people. Its government, which criminalizes even peaceful protest, seeks an extension of the free trade policies that much of the hemisphere is already reacting against. 

Cuba has begun a process of transition that should be supported in positive ways, such as through the dialogue you advocate. Mexicans and Central Americans migrate by the tens of thousands to seek work in the United States, where their labor power is much needed but their presence is denigrated by a public that has, since the development of opinion polling in the 1930s, always opposed immigration from anywhere.

The way to manage immigration is not by building a giant wall, but rather, the United States should support more equitable economic development in Mexico and Central America and, indeed, throughout the region. In addition, the U.S. must reconsider drug control policies that have simply not worked and have been part of the problem of political violence, especially in Mexico, Colombia and Peru.

And the U.S. must renew its active support for human rights throughout the region.  Unfortunately, in the eyes of many Latin Americans, the United States has come to stand for the support of inequitable regimes. 

Finally, we implore you to commit your administration to the firm support of constitutional rights, including academic and intellectual freedom.  Most of us are members of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), the largest professional association of experts on the region, and we have experienced first-hand how the Bush administration's attempt to restrict academic exchange with Cuba is counter-productive and self-defeating.  We hope for an early opportunity to discuss this and other issues regarding Latin America with your administration.

Our hope is that you will embrace the opportunity to inaugurate a new period of hemispheric understanding and collaboration for the common welfare.  We ask for change and not only in the United States.

Sincerely,

SIGNED:

Eric Hershberg, LASA President 2007-09, Professor of Politics and Director of Latin American Studies, Simon Fraser University

Charles R. Hale, LASA Past President (2006-2007), Professor of Anthropology, University of Texas at Austin

Sonia E. Alvarez, LASA Past President (2004-2006), Leonard J. Horwitz Professor of Politics, University of Massachusetts-Amherst

Marysa Navarro Aranguran, LASA Past President (2003-2004), Charles Collis Professor of History, Dartmouth College

Arturo Arias, LASA Past President, (2001-2003), Professor of Spanish and Portuguese University of Texas, Austin

Thomas Holloway, LASA Past President (2000-2001), Professor Of History, University of California, Davis

Susan Eckstein, LASA Past President (1997-98), Professor of Sociology & International Relations, Boston University

Cynthia McClintock, LASA Past President (1994-95), Professor of Political Science and International Affairs, George Washington University

Carmen Diana Deere, LASA Past President (1992-94), Professor of Food and Resource Economics and Director, Center for Latin American Studies, University of Florida

Lars Schoultz, LASA Past President (1991-92), William Rand Kenan, Jr., Professor of Political Science, UNC, Chapel Hill

Jean Franco, LASA Past President (1989-91), Emeritus Professor, Columbia University

Helen I. Safa, LASA Past President (1983-85), Emeritus Professor of Anthropology and Latin American Studies, University of Florida

Paul L. Doughty, LASA Past President (1974-75), Distinguished Service Professor, Emeritus of Anthropology and Latin American Studies, University of Florida

Marí­a Rosa Olivera-Williams, LASA Past Congress Chair (2001-2003), Associate Professor of Latin American Literature, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana

---------

Thomas Abercrombie, Associate Professor of Anthropology and Director, Center for Latin American and Caribbean Studies, NYU

Holly Ackerman, Ph.D. Librarian for Latin America and Iberia, Duke University

Judith Adler Hellman, Professor of Social and Political Science, York University, Toronto

Norma Alarcon, Professor Emeritus, University of California, Berkeley
Alfonso Alvarez, Social Worker, Boston College Graduate School

Wayne F. Anderson, Professor of History and Latin American Studies, Johnson C. Smith University, Charlotte, NC

Robert Andolina, Assistant Professor of International Studies, Seattle University

Frances R. Aparicio, Professor, Latin American and Latino Studies Program, University of Illinois at Chicago

Kirsten Appendini, El Colegio de México, Mexico

Juan Manuel Arbona, Associate Professor, Growth and Structure of Cities Program, Bryn Mawr College

Benjamin Arditi, Professor, Centro de Estudios Politicos, UNAM, Mexico, DF

Mauricio Arenas - CUPW Local 626

Andres Avellaneda, Emeritus Professor, Spanish and Latin American Studies, U. of Florida

William Avilés, Asociate Professor of Political Science, University of Nebraska, Kearney

Dra. Emperatriz Arreaza-Camero, Investigadora adscrita al Cine Club Universitario de Maracaibo, Universidad de Zulia

Florence E. Babb, Vada Allan Yeomans Professor of Women's Studies, University of Florida

Comments   

0 #20 Ch.C!João da Silva 2008-10-29 09:25
Quote:
Doubtful you learn advanced, maths, sciences, IT, software programming in La Sorbonne !!!!!!
:D ;-) ;-)
Quote
0 #19 With due respect Ch.C, we do not need these foreigners to come and tell us what to do. We have highly qualified Professors most of whom were trained locally and many in Sorbonne. ch.c. 2008-10-29 08:31
Doubtful you learn advanced, maths, sciences, IT, software programming in La Sorbonne !!!!!!

Furthermore, just look at the ranking of the World Best 200 Univetsities.

There is only one brazilian, SP University, ranked 196th !!!!!

Sadly true !!!!!!!

Thus funny your statement "We have highly qualified Professors most of whom were trained locally and many in Sorbonne" that totally prove what I have said !!!!!!!!

Another Brazilian Fairy Tale !!!!!!
Swallowed only by kids ! Young kids....who have not yet gone to Brazilian junior schools.

So much true that even Brazilians ranked themselves 46th out of 50......in test !!!!!

Viva Brazil, where the biggest growth is NON or LOW education !!!!!!

Once more I challenge anyone to prove me wrong with facts and stats that can be checked !!!!

More honesty and simple there is not !!!!!


Ohhhhhhh...... by the way my liliputian country with a population of 7,8 millions has 6 Universities ranked withing the World Best 200 !!!!!!!!!

Sorry again, these are NOT my ranking estimates.

Last but not least, for MBA degree the IMD in Lausanne - Switzerland, here are the various rankings from various sources

No. 1 Worldwide (2008) Financial Times Executive Education

No. 1 worldwide (2008) The Economist MBA Program
No. 1 in Europe (2007) Forbes
MBA Program
No. 1 in Europe (2007)

Financial Times
Open Enrollment Programs

No. 1 in Europe (2007) Financial Times
Partnership Programs
No. 1 worldwide (2007) FT "Ranking of the Rankings" MBA Program
No. 2 in Europe (2007) The Economist MBA Program
No. 2 worldwide (2007) Wall Street Journal
MBA Program
No. 3 worldwide (2007) Financial Times Executive Education



:D ;-) :D ;-) :D ;-)
;-) 8)
Quote
0 #18 João da Silva 2008-10-29 06:49
Quote:
Hundreds of LatAm Scholars Ask President Obama to Reject Free-Market Model
I enjoyed reading the open letter addressed to Obama by the "LatAm Scholars, as well as the comments made by several bloggers . The comments made by our regular bloggers Vinny and Ch.C are of great interest, since they know more about the ground reality in Brazil.

Here are my observations:

1) While going though the list of the "Scholars", some seem to be LatAm born and others acquired their knowledge though reading books and visiting LatAm briefly (and talking to their fellow academics).

2) While I am not questioning their wisdom of not sending a copy to Sen.McCain, I do question the reason for not sending similar letters to the "Rulers" of the respective countries in LatAm on which they have specialized their "research" or where they were born.

3) IMHO, whether Obama wins or McCain does, it is not going to affect the lives of the common man in LatAm, as neither of them is capable of influencing our "Rulers" to change the policy. So I recommend that they enjoy their tenure track academic post without interfering in the decision making process of our able "Rulers", bearing in mind that they know what is good for their subjects.

4) Finally in response to the comment of Ch.C:

Quote:
B) a foreigner, legally resident in Brazil, CANNOT find a job in a good or even bad Brazilian University even if he has the qualifications from a country far more developed and educated than Brazilians teachers !!!!!
With due respect Ch.C, we do not need these foreigners to come and tell us what to do. We have highly qualified Professors most of whom were trained locally and many in Sorbonne. ;-)
Quote
0 #17 Furthermore concerning..... the signatories of the letterch.c. 2008-10-29 04:09
My point is TOTALLY different to the one that disagreed with my initial arguments.

My point was :

A) a foreigner, legally resident in the USA, CAN find a job in a good U.S. University IF HE HAS the qualifications !
B) a foreigner, legally resident in Brazil, CANNOT find a job in a good or even bad Brazilian University even if he has the qualifications from a country far more developed and educated than Brazilians teachers !!!!!

If you disagree with me, just surf the Net and type.....finding a job in Brazil.

You will find hundreds of proofs about what I am saying !!!!!!
Therefore I am NOT INSINUATING ANYTHING INCORRECT.

JUST SAD PROVEN FACTS AND REALITY, WETHER YOU LIKE OR NOT.
Quote
0 #16 He might even open a new leaf of positive cooperation with the region,ch.c. 2008-10-29 03:40
Who is this idiot ü
Does he mean the USA should again DOUBLE OR TRIPLE their trade deficit ?????

And about ""Hundreds of LatAm Scholars Ask President Obama to Reject Free-Market Model"
What does that mean ?
the ones with a HUGE trade deficit (the USA and the EU) with emerging nations MUST REDUCE - ELIMINATE their trade deficit with emerging nations ?

Me too, I sign up....right now !!!!!!

Think about it !

ALL BRIC MEMBERS HAVE A HUGE TRADE SURPLUS WITH THE USA AND EU !

We should not build a wall for trade, simply charge as much as we are charged for our exports !
If not enough, then do RECIPROCAL TRADE.......on a DOLLAR FOR DOLLAR BASIS !!!!!!

This is exactly what the 368 signatories PLUS MYSELF are requesting-------- Reject Free-Market Model----- as the letter clearly stated !!!!!

Right or Not ?
If not, please explain clearly !!!!!!
Why should GM cars be made in Russia, China and Brazil....and not in the USA...for further exports ?
Are emerging nations investing in the USA to produce sugar or ethanol or textile....in the USA ? Of course not !

But with my regular "lemonish" comments, some exception should be made :
STEELS, REFINERIES and all industries that are HIGHLY POLLUTING !!!!!
EMERGING NATIONS LOVE THAT POLLUTION ! THEY WANT AND BEG FOR MORE !
Brazil is building new oil refineries to export gasoline to the USA !!!!!!!
Because the USA have not built ONE new refinery in the last 30 years due to environmental reasons !!!!!!

Therefore, this should be allowed, since Brazilians are begging and craving for more refineries !
Same for steel mills ! Thus far Brazil export iron ore to China which then is transformed to steel for either local needs or....RE-EXPORTS !
Therefore China that will surpass the U.S. pollution in a year or two, should be nice enough, to allow BRAZIL to be drown a little further with more pollution. And this will even be less costly for having first the iron ore shipped to China.

We should even finance the new steel mills !

Sure, Brazilians workers will have to stay competitive against China.
Therefore they should have the same wages as China workers !!!!!

Right or not ??????

China is sufficiently polluted, HIGH pollution growth should be transferred in.....BRAZIL....since this is the Brazilian mid and long term strategy under the REIGN OF HIS EXCELLENCE ROBING THE CROOK....SECOND TO GOD....AS HE HIMSLEF PROCLAIMED PUBLICLY !!!!!!

Just think about it !!!!!!

:D ;-) :D ;-) :D ;-)
Quote
0 #15 Sorry CH.C -my fellow Scorpio ....I meant D Ohio VinnyCarioca 2008-10-28 20:46
See prior post ;-) :D :D
Quote
0 #14 CH.CVinnyCarioca 2008-10-28 19:56
Quote:
Also i thought the writers were being generous saying tens of thousands of mexicans cross to US for work. Hundreds of thousands, millions is more likely.

A rational approach to work with our neighbors, is likely to be developed by an Obama administration. I look forward to it, refreshing after the head in the sand approaches of the past 8 years.
There is absolutely no difference between McCain and Obama on economic migrants from Mexico. McCain's nickname has been "Amnesty John" for years....especially since he teamed up with Ted Kennedy on the failed "comprehensive immigration reform". It's a win-win. Republicans import cheap and exploitable labor, while Democrat's, exploit the same labor force as part of their class warfare voting base. No difference, no difference, no difference. You would think that SOMEONE would want to discuss the process of expediting LEGAL immigration. It's not happening my fellow Scorpio.
Quote
0 #13 VinnyCarioca 2008-10-28 19:44
Quote:
Finally, we implore you to commit your administration to the firm support of constitutional rights, including academic and intellectual freedom. Most of us are members of the Latin American Studies Association (LASA), the largest professional association of experts on the region, and we have experienced first-hand how the Bush administration's attempt to restrict academic exchange with Cuba is counter-productive and self-defeating. We hope for an early opportunity to discuss this and other issues regarding Latin America with your administration.

Our hope is that you will embrace the opportunity to inaugurate a new period of hemispheric understanding and collaboration for the common welfare. We ask for change and not only in the United States.
And we would also like to laud the Castro brothers for their support of human rights and academic/intellectual freedom. Never mind the thousands of Cubans over the decades who desperately tried to escape one of the remaining totalitarian police states in the world that actually still exist.
Quote
0 #12 VinnyCarioca 2008-10-28 19:34
Quote:
The way to manage immigration is not by building a giant wall, but rather, the United States should support more equitable economic development in Mexico and Central America and, indeed, throughout the region. In addition, the U.S. must reconsider drug control policies that have simply not worked and have been part of the problem of political violence, especially in Mexico, Colombia and Peru.
A wall to keep people out or to keep them in? Remittances from the U.S. to Mexico generate more revenue for the Mexican government than oil. What does that tell you?
What is the alternative to drug control policies?
Quote
0 #11 And further more......VinnyCarioca 2008-10-28 19:22
Quote:
Cuba has begun a process of transition that should be supported in positive ways, such as through the dialogue you advocate. Mexicans and Central Americans migrate by the tens of thousands to seek work in the United States, where their labor power is much needed but their presence is denigrated by a public that has, since the development of opinion polling in the 1930s, always opposed immigration from anywhere.
Interesting....since groups of 3 or more people associating in public will draw the full force of a Cuban totalitarian police state. I don't blame citizens of Cuba (whom are legally accepted in the U.S. as political pawns), Mexico, Central America or any politically, economic, socially oppressive corrupt countries to try to gain entry into a country, that for decades encouraged them. The sad part is that they have become a net drain on the economy of the U.S. and have unfairly been lumped in to the OTHER half of illegal immigrants that have overstayed visas and have real means. The assertion that Americans 'oppose immigration from anywhere' is absurd. My family emigrated from Sicily at the turn of the 20th. century. WE ARE A NATION OF IMMIGRANTS. Sound familiar my Brazilian friends?
Quote

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Who's Online

We have 2393 guests and no members online

Statistics

Users
3
Articles
17222
Articles View Hits
127878850

----------

Brokers list for binary options

----------

Make money with binary options

----------

Shop TOBI for Dresses, Tops, Blouses, and Outerwear

----------

Only useful paper writing tips Doing homework assignments isn't hard, all you need is our advices and help

Search