• Categories
  • Archives

Brazil’s G-22 Group Crumbling


Brazil's G-22 Group Crumbling

Four Latin American countries have already abandoned the G-22,
a group led by Brazil to oppose
the economic policies of the
United States and the European Union. Costa Rica, El Salvador,
Peru
and Colombia, all of them seem to have been seduced by
Washington’s promises and scared by the
US threats.

by:
Émerson Luiz

 

The US carrot-and-stick policy seems to be working fine. Costa Rica became the latest country to pull out of the
G-22, a group of emerging countries including China, India and Brazil, whose main intent was to confront the United States
and the European Union over farm subsidies. After the dissenting group led by Brazil left the biggies talking to themselves
in Cancun, Mexico, at the end of September, US Trade Representative, Robert Zoellick, did not hide his dislike and called
Brazil a "won’t-do" country with which the US did not intend to waste more time. He also invited the "can do" countries to
join Washington.

Costa Rica heeded the appeal, following on the steps of El Salvador, Peru and Colombia, which had abandoned ship
earlier. The Costa Rica government hinted that other Latin nations should do the same soon. They are all reconsidering their
opposition position after Washington left it clear that belonging to the Brazilian-led group would hurt their chances of
bilateral negotiations with the United States.

Trying to avoid more desertions, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva made some phone calls. He made a personal
appeal to his colleague from Peru, Alejandro Toledo to reconsider his decision. Toledo didn’t reconsider anything, but
promised to send a representative, probably an observer to the G-22 (G-18?) meeting in Buenos Aires, this Friday.

At home in Brasília, the Brazil vs. US brawl, is also stirring up trouble. Roberto Rodrigues, the Agriculture Minister
and Development Minister, Luiz Fernando Furlan criticized the way the Brazilian representatives behaved in Cancun.
Officially, however, there is no disagreement. Lula’s spokesman, André Singer, defended Brazil’s actions calling them competent
and realistic and stressing that the Brazilian position is to obtain "with pragmatism and determination" better conditions for
Brazil in the area of international trade.

Rodrigues and Furlan had expressed their unhappiness with what they called "lack of information" from Itamaraty,
the Brazilian Foreign Ministry, about the Brazilian position on the Free Trade Area of the Americas. Lula called Furlan and
the Foreign Minister, Celso Amorim, on Thursday, so they would give a show of harmony before the media.

Super Minister and Chief of Staff, José Dirceu, also denied that there is any crisis in the Lula’s cabinet. For him the
Brazilian diplomacy represents the country’s interests: "What was presented in Cancun during the World Trade Organization
(WTO) meeting and in Trinidad and Tobago is the negotiating tactic of Brazil. Not only Brazil, the majority of Latin American
countries cannot understand how is it possible not to discuss agriculture questions and at the same time discuss questions dealing
with intellectual property, investment and government purchases. We’ll be bringing all these themes to the WTO."

According to the Minister, the Brazilian position on the FTAA and the United States is not an ideological one, but
simply the government defending Brazil’s national interests. "We shouldn’t either ideologize or transform this question into
a confrontation Brazil vs. United States," Dirceu said, "but at the same time we shouldn’t retreat even a millimeter when
the matter is the defense of Brazil’s interests."

Leaving the door open for any strategic retreat, Dirceu also stressed that the Brazilian proposal in Trinidad and
Tobago for the FTAA wasn’t Brasília’s last word on the subject. This, says Dirceu, makes the Brazilian position something that
cannot be criticized either in Brazil or overseas.

Even if the G-18 (and dwindling) keeps the three big honchos (Brazil, China and India), analysts believe that Brazil
should not delude itself expecting that these two countries would do anything that might hurt their national interests just to keep
the group of emerging countries alive.

  • Show Comments (0)

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Ads

You May Also Like

Lygia Fagundes Telles’s Mistérios In Portuguese

3 by Lygia Fagundes Telles I exaggerated, I didn’t have to exaggerate so much. ...

Brazilian Painted Faces Are Back, But Now in Favor of Government

Some 10,000 demonstrators marched Tuesday, August 16, in Brazil’s capital BrasÀ­lia to protest against ...

Brazil Helps Africa Create Research Infrastructure

Brazil plans to launch a project to boost public-health research in Portuguese-speaking countries in ...

Brazil’s Largest Port Gets Boost in Exports and Drop in Imports

Cargo activity in the Port of Santos, Brazil, Latin America’s largest port, set a ...

Brazil’s Stock Market Rebounds But Trade Balanced Is in the Red

Brazil’s stock exchange, the Bovespa, started the week in a positive note after three ...

Brazil: Multinationals’ Pressure Delays Transgenics’ Labeling Tilll 2012

Until 2012 exports and imports among the Cartagena Biosecurity Protocol signatory nations will not ...

Brazil Has 60,000 in Line for a Transplant

Brazilians will be commemorating National Organ Donation Day on September 27. Brazil currently has ...

Brazilian Market Dips After Record Post-Carnaval High

Latin American stocks were mixed, with Brazilian shares easing lower, as investors locked in ...

Architect of Plan Real Says Brazil Needs Education to Avoid Curse of Natural Resources

Edmar Bacha, a leading Brazilian economist and one of the architects behind the 1994 ...