New US Study Shows Brazil as Agressive Foreign Investor

Brazil's CVRD, Vale do Rio Doce A new survey released this Monday, December 3, by the Columbia Program on International Investment (CPII) and the Brazil-based Fundação Dom Cabral (FDC) in New York reveals that Brazil's top multinational enterprises (MNEs) have made the country the second largest outward investor among developing countries in terms of foreign direct investment (FDI) outflows in 2006.

Among the survey's main findings:

– Brazil's Top 20 multinationals have US$ 56 billion assets abroad, equivalent to over half of the country's outward FDI stock.

– The Top 20 produce and sell goods and services worth approximately US$ 30 billion and employ 77,000 persons abroad.

– About half focus on their region, Latin America, where they are represented in the relative largest number of countries.

– The multinationalization of Brazilian firms has risen rapidly during the past few years, fueled primarily by natural resource firms; these firms account for about two-thirds of the foreign assets of the Top 20.

CVRD leads the MNE ranking list, which also includes many industrial groups, heavy construction companies and some high-tech groups like EMBRAER and Itautec.

– Despite the concentrated nature of outward FDI from Brazil, a growing number of firms, including many small and medium-sized enterprises, are becoming multinationals.

"This is an extraordinary performance by the leading Brazilian multinationals – and it raises real managerial challenges for them, namely how to manage this process and the international production networks that are the result, and at the same time contribute to a more sustainable world," says Emerson de Almeida, President of FDC.

Adds Karl P. Sauvant, Executive Director of the Columbia Program on International Investment, "Brazilian firms, led by CVRD, are becoming important players in the world FDI market."

Fundação Dom Cabral, a leading international executive and company development center, and the Columbia Program on International Investment, a joint undertaking of the Columbia Law School and The Earth Institute at Columbia University, collaborated on this ranking of Brazilian MNEs.

The exercise is part of a global effort to rank emerging market MNEs, with the results for Russia, China, Hong Kong (China) and South Africa to be released soon.

Top 20

The foreign assets held by Brazilian multinationals more than doubled between 2005 and 2006, signaling the take-off of Brazilian multinationals. This growth was due in part to CVRD's US$ 18 billion acquisition of Inco (Canada) in 2006.

Increasingly also, the financing of foreign expansion can draw on global pools of capital, with eight of the top ten multinationals listed on both the New York Stock Exchange and the São Paulo Stock Exchange (BOVESPA).

As a percentage of total assets, the foreign assets of the Top 20 range from 1% to 46%, with only two having more than US$ 10 billion in foreign assets. For the group as a whole, foreign assets were 20% of total assets in 2006, compared to 12% in 2005 (this increase is mostly due to CVRD's acquisition of Inco).

This compares to 33% for the 100 largest multinationals from developing countries in 2005 – indicating that Brazilian multinationals still have a considerable way to go to catch up with the average of their (especially Asian) competitors.

In line with the increase in assets, the foreign employment of the Top 20 almost doubled from 2005 to 2006. Three (led by Odebrecht) have more than 10,000 employees abroad. The average of foreign employment to total employment for the Top 20 is 19% (compared to 39% for the largest 100 MNEs from developing countries).

Some two-thirds of foreign employment is located in Latin America. All of the Top 20's CEOs are Brazilian. Five out of the 157 board members of the Top 20 are non-Brazilian (3%). Surprisingly, eight of the Top 20 say that they have Spanish and/or English as an official language, in addition to Portuguese.

The distribution by industry shows a great concentration in the natural resources sector, with two companies (CVRD and Petrobras) representing more than two-thirds of the foreign assets of the Top 20.

A second group, composed of companies manufacturing industrial products, accounts for more than 19%. Brazilian MNEs that assemble finished goods and service companies represent each around 6%, leaving less than 1% for the only company in the consumer business (Natura).

The production and hence foreign sales by foreign affiliates, at US$ 30 billion, represent about one-sixth of their total sales. Six have production and hence sales of over US$ 1 billion abroad, and one (Petrobras) over US$ 10 billion. Foreign sales rose by 14% in 2006, which was half as fast as assets.

The foreign sales and hence production of the Top 20 were the equivalent of about one-fifth of the country's exports in 2006, making FDI increasingly more important for Brazil in terms of delivering goods and services to foreign markets.

If the exports of the parent firms of the Top 20 (not including Petrobras and Natura, due to lack of data) are added to the production and sales of their foreign affiliates, the total is US$ 42 billion, for a 44% ratio of international vs. total sales. This ratio is already in line with the data reported by UNCTAD for the largest 100 MNEs from developing countries (43%).

If Brazilian multinationals were ranked according to the Transnationality Index, the list would be led by Gerdau, CVRD and Sabo. Many firms consist of course of various divisions, with each having a different degree of multinationality.

An example is Odebrecht, whose overall index is 27%; however, if its petrochemical side, Braskem, is excluded from the total and Odebrecht Construction is taken by itself, the company's Transnationality Index is 57%, the highest in the list.

The foreign affiliates of the Top 20 have a wide geographic spread. Together, the Top 20 are present in 51 countries. On average, they were present in about three host countries, led by Votorantim, Camargo Correa, Odebrecht and Weg, which each is present in 12 countries outside of Brazil.

If one calculates the number of host countries in which a Brazilian multinational is located in a given region as a percentage of all host countries in which it is located (times 100), one arrives at the Regionality Index. It shows that about half of the Top 20 have most  of their activities in Latin America, with a few giving special attention to Europe and Asia. In other words, in line with firms from other outward FDI countries, most Brazilian multinationals are regional firms.

The Whole Picture

The data on the Top 20 need to be seen in the context of Brazil's total inward and outward FDI flows. For the first time since official statistics have become available, outward flows in 2006 (US$ 28 billion) were higher than inward flows (US$ 19 billion), although this is not likely to become a pattern in the near future.

Still, both types of flows are forecasted to stay at relatively high levels. This made Brazil the second most important outward investor among developing countries (after Hong Kong (China)) in terms of FDI outflows in 2006, and the top outward investor in Latin America.

A good part of these flows took the form of mergers and acquisitions (M&As), but greenfield investments were also quite important.

By the end of 2006, Brazil had accumulated an OFDI stock of US$ 108, making it the third largest outward investor among developing countries (after Hong Kong (China) and Singapore). According to Brazil's Central Bank, in 2005 most of this investment was in financial services (49%), followed by professional services (36%) and petrochemicals and energy (4%). The lion's share is located in Latin America and the Caribbean (56%), followed by Europe (36%) and North America (7%).

Brazil's outward FDI is being undertaken by 885 multinationals  headquartered in Brazil, showing that, apart from the firms captured in the ranking, there are many small and medium-sized Brazilian firms that are beginning their efforts to become competitive in foreign markets.

The results of this survey will be analyzed during the international seminar "Consolidação Regional e Expansão Global das Empresas Multinacionais Latino-Americanas", São Paulo to be held at the Hotel Transamérica on December 6 and 7.

Researchers from the International Business Center (FDC) and the Columbia Program on International Investment responsible for the ranking, and executives from the ranked companies, will participate as panelists during the seminar.

In a special roundtable, they will discuss the main issues and challenges related to the internationalization strategies of Brazilian MNEs.

The Project

The FDC-CPII 2007 Ranking of Brazilian Multinational Enterprises was conducted in the framework of the Emerging Markets Global Players Project, a collaborative effort led by the Columbia Program on International Investment.

It brings together researchers on FDI from leading institutions in emerging markets to generate annual ranking lists of emerging market MNEs. The next rankings will be released for Russia by SKOLKOVO Moscow School of Management; China and Hong Kong (China) by Fudan University; and South Africa by University of Pretoria.

Given the importance of the international expansion of companies from BRIC countries, CPII, FDC, Fudan University, the Indian School of Business and SKOLKOVO Moscow School of Management will organize a series of conferences dedicated to that phenomenon. The first Five Diamond conference will take place in New York City on April 28-29, 2008.

The Involved

Fundação Dom Cabral is an international executive and company development center aligned with the most current management technologies. Receiving over 20,000 executives in its programs annually, FDC has been placed among the 20 best business schools in the world by the Financial Times executive education ranking in 2007.

The Columbia Program on International Investment (CPII), headed by Dr. Karl P. Sauvant, is a joint undertaking of the Columbia Law School and The Earth Institute at Columbia University. It seeks to be a leader on issues related to FDI in the global economy.

The CPII focuses on the analysis and teaching of the implications of FDI for public policy and international investment law. Its objectives are to analyze important topical policy-oriented issues related to FDI, develop and disseminate practical approaches and solutions, and provide students with a challenging learning environment.

Table 1.

FDC-CPII ranking of the top 20 Brazilian multinationals, in terms of foreign assets, 2006 (Millions of US$ )

Rank        Name        Industry
1        Companhia Vale do Rio Doce (CVRD)        Mining & metals
2        Petrobras S.A. (Petroleo Brasileiro S.A.)        Oil & gas
3        Gerdau S.A.        Steel
4        EMBRAER – Empresa Brasileira de Aeronáutica S.A.        Aviation
5        Votorantim Participações S.A.        Diversified
6        Companhia Siderurgica Nacional (CSN)        Steel
7        Camargo Corrêa S.A.        Diversified
8        Odebrecht S.A.        Construction & petrochemicals
9        Aracruz Celulose        Pulp & paper
10        Weg S.A.        Electro-mechanical
11        Marcopolo S.A.        Transport
12        Andrade Gutierrez S.A.        Diversified
13        Tigre S.A. Tubos e Conexões        Construction
14        Usinas Siderúrgicas de Minas Gerais S.A.-Usiminas        Steel
15        Natura Cosméticos S.A.        Cosmetics
16        Itautec S.A.        IT
17        America Latina Logistica S.A.        Logistics
18        Ultrapar Participações S.A.        Diversified
19        Sabó Indústria e Comércio de Autopeças Ltda.        Automobile parts
20        Lupatech S.A.        Electro-mechanical

Total foreign assets of the Top 20:  56,426
Source: FDC-CPII survey of Brazilian multinationals.

Half of the Top 20 are headquartered in Sao Paulo state. They are all privately held firms, except for Petrobras. CVRD and Petrobras, the top two (and both natural resource companies), together accounted for over two-thirds of the foreign assets of the Top 20; if the third ranking firm, Gerdau, is added, more than three-quarters of all the foreign assets of the Top 20 are accounted for.


For more information see


  • Show Comments (3)

  • swiss pride

    Ch.c Here is what you forgot to tell to the Brazilians
    That your foreign assets came from mostly criminal sources, starting at the WWII all the way to just a few weeks ago with the money laundry scandal in Brazil. So yessss its easy to see how can somebody (or nobody) like you could be so proud of a country that institutionalizes such criminal activities as part of their main economy structure.
    By the way I went to your site and didnˢ۪t see any information supporting your delusions.

    Source : 2005 annual report of the Swiss Central Bank.
    Swiss banks and World War II
    Several inquiries have been made into the conduct of Swiss banks during the National Socialist (Nazi) regime in Germany (1933À¢€“1945), especially regarding funds deposited by or stolen from victims of the Holocaust.
    In October of 1996, as inquiries into the banks’ activities during the Holocaust were ongoing, Swiss ambassador to the United States Carlo Jagmetti admitted that some banks prevented Holocaust survivors from accessing their funds, although he disputed the amounts claimed in lawsuits by survivors. Among those leading inquiries into the banks’ conduct during the war was Alfonse D’Amato, a United States Senator from New York.[33] United Bank of Switzerland security guard Christoph Meili became a prominent whistleblower when he prevented the destruction of Holocaust-era records and brought attention to their existence. Due to his actions, Meili lost his job and received death threats; he became the first Swiss citizen ever granted political asylum in the United States. After settling in southern California, he was honored by the Los Angeles Jewish community.[34] Meili was supported financially by several Jewish organizations, and was offered a full scholarship at Chapman University in California.[35][36] In 1998, an international panel of historians released a study that claimed a significant amount of gold had been stolen from Holocaust victims, as well as the treasuries of conquered countries, and deposited in the Swiss National Bank. The panel found that, despite evidence of theft and wrongful acquisition of the gold, the SNB continued to accept the deposits.[37] In 2000, a United States District Court judge approved a US$1.85 billion settlement between several Swiss banks and Holocaust victims. An estimated 50,000 accounts in Switzerland were opened by victims during the Nazi regime; some banks refused to make payments to victims’ families because of the lack of death certificates.[38] However, an article published on October 13, 2001 in The Times of London claimed that the tribunal entrusted with tracing Holocaust era accounts found that only 200 of the 5,570 abandoned foreign accounts in question, containing about 12 million dollars, could be traced back to Holocaust survivors; most of the abandoned accounts were owned by wealthy gentiles, and half the accounts contained less than 1,000 francs.
    [edit] Swiss Banks to return Abacha Funds to Nigeria
    The Swiss foreign ministry says it has done all it can to ensure that funds stolen by the late Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha were used properly in his homeland.
    The authorities were responding to allegations that $200 million (SFr240 million) of $700 million handed back by the Swiss Banks to Nigeria had been misappropriated.[1]

  • Eduardo

    Mr. Whorever
    Loosing ground…Remenber that South was nothing 30 years ago.
    Just waiting !! Enjoyy

  • ch:c.

    Great…but read again :
    “indicating that Brazilian multinationals still have a considerable way to go to catch up with the average of their (especially Asian) competitors”

    To put things in perspective, the “small” FIRMS of my little country, at the end of 2005, had US$ 510 billion of foreign assets, generating
    US$ 45 billion of….YEARLY PROFITS (not sales)…….and 2’000’000 (yesssss 2 millions) of direct jobs in the countries the investments were made.
    Source : 2005 annual report of the Swiss Central Bank.

    Long long way to go, and many many more decades not years, before you even come close. And many generations away before you even come close if based on a per capita basis.

    Enjoy !!!!!

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


You May Also Like

Beer Makers in Brazil Busted for Half a Billion Tax Fraud

The tax embezzlement scheme allegedly practiced by the Schincariol beverage company may have diverted ...

Indians Get Land in Brazil and Governor Declares 7 Days of Mourning

After more than thirty years of resistance and organization by the Makuxi, Ingarikó, Taurepang, ...

Brazil Creates Group to Lobby US Congress and End Ethanol Protectionism

According to Brazil’s ambassador in Washington, Roberto Abdenur, what Brazil and the US need ...

Brazil’s Lí­der Gets Six Sikorsky Choppers

The Export-Import Bank of the United States (Ex-Im Bank) has approved approximately US$ 41 ...

Pushed by Soy and Sugar Brazil’s Agribusiness Exports Jump 11% in 2006

Agribusiness sales in Brazil grew 16% in the month of March when compared to ...

IMF Goes to Brazil to Liquidate the Country’s Debt

The managing director of the International Monetary Fund, Rodrigo de Rato, will be in ...

Historical center of Joгo Pessoa, Paraнba state, Brazil

Despite Its Derelict Air, João Pessoa, Brazil, Has Some Charm

At the beginning of the year the coastal cities in the Northeast of Brazil ...

Brazilian women protest against Bush

Will the Sudden US-Brazil Romance Last? It Will Depend on Terror Factor

In the several pound issue of last Sunday’s Washington Post (3/11/07), President Bush’s Latin ...

European Delegation in Brazil Deals with Biofuel and Beef Ban

Twelve European Members of Parliament are currently in Brazil to assess livestock and beef ...