US and EU Subsidies of US$ 13 Billion Harm Brazil and Developing Nations

The European Union and the United States are illegally subsidizing their production of corn, rice, sorghum, fruit juice, canned fruit, tomatoes, dairy products, tobacco and wine, according to new research published by international agency Oxfam.

The EU and the US must do more to deliver a development deal ahead of a crucial WTO Ministerial meeting on December 13-18 otherwise they could end up facing a mountain of litigation, Oxfam says, because developing countries will be left with no other options.

Of the 11 commodities studied, the US and the EU pay out total annual farm subsidies worth US$ 9.3 billion and US$ 4.2 billion respectively which help to distort world trade.

Oxfam found that 38 developing countries are suffering from unfair competition as a result, including larger countries such as Mexico and Brazil as well as poor countries like Malawi and Mozambique.

Oxfam consulted legal experts who concluded that the affected countries could bring multiple cases against the EU and the US and win.

"The WTO cases that the EU lost on sugar subsidies and the US lost on cotton subsidies are just the tip of the iceberg," said Phil Bloomer, head of Oxfam’s Make Trade Fair campaign.

"Oxfam is not against all subsidies but we’ve always said that the worst of them lead to dumping. We now know that many of these harmful subsidies are not only unfair but also illegal under WTO rules."

Oxfam’s report says that the WTO’s dispute settlement mechanism is expensive and complicated and is therefore an option of last resort. "The way to reform global trade rules in order to promote development is across a negotiating table, not in a courtroom," Bloomer said.

But rich countries are not doing enough at the current WTO talks. The EU and the US are even demanding immunity from prosecution under the so-called ‘Peace Clause’.

Oxfam says that rich countries should not get immunity but instead should implement the agreements they’ve already signed, and offer deeper concessions to cut their trade-distorting subsidies and open up their markets. If not, developing countries should reject their deal.

"Unless the EU and the US live up to their promises at the WTO they will leave developing countries no option but the dock," Bloomer said. "Poor countries shouldn’t be forced to seek development through the courts."

Oxfam’s new research found that the EU and the US were breaking the WTO’s Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures. The subsidies are either prohibited because they are contingent on the use of domestic products over imported ones or actionable because they displace developing country exports, suppress market prices and harm other countries’ domestic industries.

Oxfam found that the US has paid US$ 25 billion to its corn farmers over the past five years for a crop that would otherwise have lost US$ 20 billion over the same period.

Without subsidies, in 2004 alone, US production would be down 15%, its exports would have disappeared and world prices would have been 7% higher.

Farmers from the likes of Paraguay, Argentina or South Africa – or those from countries where US corn is dumped, including Ecuador, Honduras, Peru and Venezuela – could have gained an extra US$ 4 billion.

The US also pays subsidies of around US$ 1.2 billion a year to its rice farmers, representing 99% of the value of the total US crop. Major rice exporters such as Thailand, Uruguay, Guyana, India and Suriname could all have strong claims against the US relating to third country market export sales, as could countries into which US rice is dumped such as Haiti, Zambia, Mexico, Ghana and Costa Rica.

The EU pays €300 million a year to tomato processors mainly in Greece, Italy, Spain and Portugal, representing 65% of the value of the entire crop, enabling them to be the world’s leading exporters of tomato paste. Growers in South Africa, Chile and Tunisia are among those losing out.

The EU subsidizes its fruit-juice processing industry, mainly in Italy and Spain, at a rate of more than 300%, or €250 million a year. Growers from Argentina, Brazil, Costa Rica and South Africa could earn US$ 40 million a year more if the EU removed its subsidies and the world juice price rose by just 5%.

The EU also protects its dairy regime from competition and subsidizes its dairy producers by US$ 1.5 billion a year. Argentina, Brazil and Uruguay could export butter if EU export subsidies weren’t depressing world prices. EU butter is dumped directly into Egypt, Morocco and South Africa.

Previous Oxfam research has shown that the EU and the US are not doing enough at the WTO talks to cut their farm subsidy payments; in the case of the EU, it could even increase its support by US$ 13 billion a year under the current offer.

Oxfam has also shown that the vast bulk of EU and US subsidies go to their biggest producers and largely by-pass their smaller farmers. Subsidies should be reformed so that they support smaller farmers, rural development and environmental protection.

Oxfam says the EU and the US should stop paying prohibited subsidies on the basis of their "local content" only. They should reduce their trade-distorting support by more than they have offered so far and accept additional disciplines on those subsidies that remain. The US should stop all distorting support for cotton and the EU should eliminate all export support by 2010.


  • Show Comments (3)

  • Guest

    smile….to the last forum member !
    Today there is a very interesting article on Brazzil Mag with the headline :

    “Deceitful and inconsistent, Brazil is not third world champion”

    The journalist knows and understands the two sides ! Smile.

    Aas to the US$ 13 billions in annual increase of the EU subsidsies, the article goes deeper, saying it could increase by 29.2 billions Euros for the EU and from US$ 16.3 billions presently to US$ 36 billions for the USA.

    Another of today’s article in this same site,
    a “famous” brazilian economist says that western countries pay US$ 1 billion A DAY for subsidises.

    This just show you how they all agree and disagrre at the same time with their stupid numbers.

    No doubt that their sources of informations are not the same. They simply dont have any.

    To get populist support they would put a random number that varies depending of their mood not facts.
    Lula and his gang of Ministers lie every day to their citizens to keep power and hide the true and sad reality of Brazil.
    For obvious reasons when they do something right it is because of them being smart and when they do something wrong it because of rich nations.
    They do everything right when they do their public speeches. Lula promised 10 millions new jobs for his first mandate but created only around 3 millions, and this during the best economic boom in decades.
    He also promised to settle 400’000 MST families but so far settled only around 130’000 or so.
    Lula has simply been and is a traitor to the voters who elected him. He was just lucky to have been elected when the country was on the verge of bankrupty and the world in a recession. So it is normal that a recovery followed. His performance, contrary to what he says, is not good at all. Most developing countries grew far more than Brazil during the last 3 years and continue to do so.

    And corruption that he fighted during all his life is now, under his mandate, at the highest level ever. GREAT performance there. YES.

  • Guest

    In additionm the following paragraph does not make sense/is not written well:
    “Previous Oxfam research has shown that the EU and the US are not doing enough at the WTO talks to cut their farm subsidy payments; in the case of the EU, it could even increase its support by US$ 13 billion a year under the current offer.”

  • Guest

    who is right ?
    this article says that the US and EU combined subsidizes are US$ 13 billions annually.

    another article, same site, same day, says that western countries subsidies are US$ 1 billion per day.

    So does anyone knows for sure what the true numbers are ? Because one source says US$ 13 billions and the orher source says US$ 360 billions.

    Simple demonstration of how stupid are some people.

    By the way what are your own subsidies ?
    Just in Brazil, the BNDES give loans to farmers and agribusinesses at a rate of between 6 and 10 % when the normal borrowing rates are between 50 to 150 %.
    Therefore if you take the total outstanding subsidized loans at preferred rates and the true rate that should be paid and you find out what your own subsidies are ! You will find out that Brazil is subisdizing their farmers and agribusinesses by the billions of US$ !

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

comment *

  • name *

  • email *

  • website *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.


You May Also Like

Brazilian Farmers Put a Good Word for Monsanto and GM Crops

Conversations about Plant Biotechnology, a site sponsored by multinational Monsanto, a biotech company notorious ...

Brazil Isn’t Ready to Replace the US as Protector of Latin America

Many modern intellectuals (leftist economists and political scientists of various nationalities) have been advocating ...

Brazilian Minister Says Lula Will Keep His Word to Settle 400,000 Landless Families

Brazil’s Minister of Agrarian Development, Miguel Rossetto, declared that the Brazilian government’s previously announced ...

Brazil Gets First Exclusive Publication for iPad. It’s a Free 24/7 Experience

Brazil is getting a glimpse of its first media interface developed specially for the ...

125 Countries in Brazil Debating Child Sex, Trafficking and Pornography

Close to 3,000 participants from over 125 countries have gathered in Rio de Janeiro, ...

Brazil Puts Biodiesel in the Tank

While developed nations around the world are working on diversifying 10 to 20 percent ...

A Campaign to Save Brazilian Indians from Genocide

Survival International, a human rights organization that fights for tribal peoples, has launched a ...


Hollywood Bound By Offering American listeners a rarely heard perspective on contemporary Brazilian music, ...

Cultural Potpourri

It is so rare to see Portuguese-language poems translated into English and published in ...