Lula’s Administration Bends to Pressure and Makes Changes in Human Rights Plan

Paulo Vannuchi Brazilian minister Paulo Vannuchi, the head of the Human Rights Secretariat, has confirmed that changes will be made to the Third National Human Rights Plan (PNDH-3). which caused a storm of controversy when it was released in December.

Criticism rained down on it from the Catholic Church, the farm sector, the media and the military.

Vannuchi reports that changes will be made in a new document that will be released in May. There will be changes in the chapters dealing with abortion, religious symbols in public areas and land conflict mediation.

The minister also revealed that discussions were underway with media representatives (the Brazilian Association of Radio and Television (Abert), the National Association of Magazine Editors (Aner) and the National Association of Newspapers (ANJ)) to iron out any problems with the language regarding freedom of the press.

In a declaration he made at a public hearing in the Senate, Vannuchi said that next week a draft bill will be completed for the creation of a Truth Commission that will investigate the period between 1964 and 1985 when Brazil was run by generals.

But he added that there was no intention of doing so for revenge (“espírito de revanchismo”) and affirmed that the Amnesty Law of 1979 would not be changed.

The Supreme Court will begin examining a lawsuit filed by the National Bar Association (OAB) that questions articles in that law dealing with crimes practiced because of, or motivated by, political reasons during the military dictatorship (1964-85).
According to the OAB, the wording in the law extends amnesty to “absolutely undefined crimes,” including torture, which should not be subject to statutes of limitation.

The 1979 law, says the OAB, also protects people who were members of the government (“agentes públicos”) and committed common crimes such as homicide, abuse of authority, unusual punishment, forced disappearance and rape against people whose only crime was that they opposed the military regime.

Meanwhile, the heads of the government’s prosecution office (procuradoria-geral da República) and the head of the Government Attorney Executive Office (Advocacia Geral da União) have both come out against the OAB lawsuit saying it is a rupture of a commitment the country made in 1979 and point out that there are statutes of limitation for most of the crimes




You May Also Like

Brazil’s Human Scavengers Finally Get a Break

For the fifth successive Christmas, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva visited an association ...

No Visas Required as Brazil and South America Create Friendly Community

The twelve countries which make up the South American Community of Nations signed Friday ...

Brazil’s Supreme Sides with Indians Ousted from their Ancestral Lands

Brazilian Supreme Court’s (STF) Commission on Jurisprudence denied the request of the National Agriculture ...

Brazilian President Sacks a Lula Man and Gets a New Lula Man as Defense Minister

Brazil’s Defense minister Nelson Jobim (now former minister) was in Tabatinga in the state ...

Brazil’s Chicken Exports to Middle East Grow 73% at the Expense of US

The Middle East was the region of the world that bought the most chicken ...

Brazil Starts Luxury Train Route for Foreigners

Brazil's first luxury train, the Great Brazil Express (like this, in English), starts operation ...

After Brazil’s Timid Social Democracy Dilma Has a Chance to Start New Cycle

Politics, like history, occurs in cycles. Brazil is passing through a cycle of democratic ...

Best-seller books, plays & movies

Alô? Madame!… — It all starts when two friends get a phone number that ...

Africa and Middle East Countries Become Top Importers from Brazil

Among the greatest buyers of some of the main products in the Brazilian export ...

Brazil’s First Hydrogen Bus Enters Service in Sí£o Paulo

Brazil sees this as the starting point in a quest for cleaner public transport ...